Arthroscopic all-inside repair of Palmer type 1B triangular fibrocartilage complex tears: a technical note

Comparing the Outcomes of Suture Anchor Repair and Rein-Type Capsular Suture for Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Tears With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

Recent biomechanical studies have highlighted the importance of foveal reinsertion when repairing triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury with foveal tears. However, clinical studies comparing different repair techniques are scarce. We compared the clinical outcomes of suture anchor repair and rein-type capsular suture in patients with TFCC palmer 1B foveal tears with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

This was a single-surgeon, single-center, retrospective, comparative study. We included patients who underwent TFCC repair surgery due to a foveal tear from December 2013 to October 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Postoperative Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, visual analogue scale for pain, wrist range of motion, and grip strength were compared. We also measured the maximal ulnar head displacement with dynamic ultrasound to quantify distal radioulnar joint stability.

RESULTS

In total, 103 patients were in the suture anchor group (group A) and 84 patients in the rein-type capsular suture group (group B). The mean follow-up time exceeded three years for both groups. There was a minimal difference regarding QuickDASH score, visual analogue scale for pain, and grip strength ratio between the two groups. The rein-type group had significantly better Modified Mayo Wrist Score. The suture anchor group showed better distal radioulnar joint stability with dynamic ultrasound, but was more limited in ulnar deviation. However, these differences are most likely clinically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Both suture anchor repair and rein-type capsular suture yielded satisfactory results for TFCC 1B foveal tear in a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The functional scores were similar, and no major complications or recurrent instability were noted in either group.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective Therapeutic Comparative Investigation IV.

A new arthroscopic repair technique for triangular fibrocartilage complex using an intracapsular suture: an outside-in transfer all-inside repair

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic repair is a promising, minimally invasive surgical technique for patients with Palmer type 1B peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears. Although several arthroscopic techniques are effective for repairing Palmer type 1B TFCC tears, some shortcomings remain. So, we report an arthroscopic repair technique for the treatment of Palmer type 1B Atzei class 1 TFCC tears using an intracapsular suture: an outside-in transfer all-inside repair.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 38 Palmer type 1B TFCC injury patients admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into 2 groups. The group A was sutured from the outside to the inside, with a total of 21 cases; the group B was sutured with the new arthroscopic repair technique, with a total of 17 cases. Observe and compare the VAS scores and modified Mayo wrist function scores of all patients before 3, and 6 months after the operation and evaluate the incidence of thread knots in patients with different treatment methods. The methodology was performed an arthroscopic intracapsular suture using an outside-in transfer, all-inside repair technique, which is a modified method of the outside-in and all-inside technique using the needle of a 10-mL sterile syringe, for Palmer type 1B TFCC tears. A No. 2 polydioxanone suture was threaded through the needle and entered the wrist joint. Next, the needle was withdrawn carefully along the suture to the proximal tear ulnar surface of the TFCC and penetrated the TFCC, exiting the articular cavity surface of the ulnar side of the torn TFCC. Finally, arthroscopic knotting was performed.

RESULTS

This new treatment was as effective as the previously arthroscopic techniques and had the advantages of no additional incision and decreased risk of operation-related complications. The incidence of thread knots in the group A (28.57%) was significantly higher than that in the group B (0%), and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.024). There was no significant difference in VAS score and modified Mayo wrist function scores between the two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The outside-in transfer, the all-inside repair technique is suitable for Palmer type 1B Atzei class 1 TFCC tears. We recommend this technique as a useful alternative to the conventional methods of repairing Palmer type 1B TFCC tears.

All-Inside Versus Outside-in Repair of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Peripheral Tears

PURPOSE

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) peripheral tears with persistent wrist pain can be treated with arthroscopic surgical repair owing to vascularization of the peripheral region. The safety and efficacy of all-inside repair has been shown in prior case series. The purpose of this study was to compare two methods of arthroscopic peripheral TFCC repair: all-inside vertical mattress and outside-in horizontal mattress.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective review was performed on patients treated from 2016 to 2021 with wrist arthroscopy and TFCC repair for Palmer 1B tears. Patients with ulnar extrinsic ligament repair, distal radioulnar joint instability, concomitant ulnar shortening osteotomy, and extensor carpi ulnaris instability were excluded. Patient therapy and office visit records were reviewed. Outcomes including Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH); range of motion; grip strength; immobilization time; complications; and need for revision procedures were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients were included in the study, 32 in the outside-in group and 20 in the all-inside group. The average follow-up length was 24.8 weeks, with similar range of motion and strength in both groups. The average postoperative QuickDASH score was 13 in the outside-in group and 9 in the all-inside group at 43.5 months, compared with the preoperative QuickDASH scores of 47 and 50, respectively. Mean immobilization time was longer for outside-in than for all-inside (5.25 vs 2.0 weeks, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

All-inside arthroscopic peripheral TFCC repair showed range of motion, grip strength, complications, revisions, and postoperative improvement in QuickDASH scores similar to those with the outside-in technique.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV; retrospective comparative study.

Advances in the Repair of Palmer type IB TFCC Injuries With Wrist Arthroscopy

The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is essential for maintaining wrist stability. Injury-caused pain is the primary cause of ulnar wrist pain. The TFCC injury refractory to conservative treatment requires further surgical treatment, and because Palmer type IB tears belong to peripheral injuries due to their proximity to the blood supply area, arthroscopic suture repair has become the preferred surgical method for TFCC injury repair, exhibiting strong healing ability. This study reviewed the anatomy of TFCC, injury classification, and advances in arthroscopic suturing for treating Palmer type IB.

The rein-type arthroscopic capsular suture for triangular fibrocartilage complex foveal tears: midterm results for 90 patients

We describe an arthroscopic rein-type capsular suture that approximates the triangular fibrocartilage complex to the anatomical footprint, and report the results at a minimum 12 month follow-up. The procedure involves two 3-0 polydioxanone horizontal mattress sutures inserted 1.5 cm proximal to the 6-R and 6-U portals to obtain purchase on the dorsal and anterior radioulnar ligaments, respectively. The two sutures work as a rein to approximate the triangular fibrocartilage complex to the fovea. Ninety patients with Type IB triangular fibrocartilage complex injuries were included retrospectively. The 12-month postoperative Modified Mayo Wrist scores, Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores and visual analogue scale for pain showed significant improvements on preoperative values. Postoperative range of wrist motion, grip strength and ultrasound assessment of the distal radioulnar joint stability were comparable with the normal wrist. The patients had high satisfaction scores for surgery. There were minor complications of knot irritation. No revision surgery for distal radioulnar joint instability was required. It is an effective and technically simple procedure that provides a foveal footprint contact for the triangular fibrocartilage complex.Level of evidence: IV.

Comparative outcomes between all-inside arthroscopic suture anchor technique versus arthroscopic transosseous suture technique in patients with triangular fibrocartilage complex tear: a retrospective comparative study

Background

Triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) has become an interest over the last few decades, discovering its understanding in anatomy, pathomechanism, biomechanics, and management in treatments. Currently, TFCC does not have a golden standard procedure, and not one surgical procedure is superior to the other. This study is to evaluate the comparative outcomes in TFCC patients that underwent either in all-inside arthroscopic suture anchors or the arthroscopic transosseous suture technique.

Method

From 2017 to 2019, 30 patients were analyzed. Eight patients were in an arthroscopic transosseous group and 22 patients were in an all-inside arthroscopic group. Comparison between patients’ flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and visual analog pain scale (VAS) preoperative and six-month follow-up were analyzed.

Result

There were significant increases in flexion ROM, extension ROM, and VAS between preoperative and postoperative in all-inside arthroscopic and arthroscopic transosseous. Only the all-inside arthroscopic group had a significant increase in grip strength. Postoperative flexion ROM had a significant difference between all-inside arthroscopic and arthroscopic transosseous.

Conclusion

Both the all-inside arthroscopic suture anchor technique and the arthroscopic transosseous suture technique are appropriate treatments to treat patients with TFCC. Both procedures have achieved the ultimate goal of improved longevity and optimal function.

Level of evidence

Level III; retrospective comparative cohort study.

Single-strand repair of EWAS 1 lesion of triangular fibrocartilage complex

PURPOSE

To report the results of our modified technique for repair of the EWAS 1 lesion of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC).

METHODS

This retrospective case series reviewed 22 consecutive patients with EWAS 1 TFCC tear. Arthroscopic repair was done using our modified double-loop arthroscopic outside-in technique which is originally described by Mathoulin and Del Piñal. The repair was performed using single-strand suture and 18-gauge cannula, having three passes through the tear. Follow-ups ranged from 24 to 33 months with an average of 29.3 months. The results were evaluated by the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), Visual Analog Score (VAS). In addition, range of motion (ROM) and power grip were compared with the contralateral side.

RESULTS

The mean age was 23 years. The dominant side was affected in 16 wrists. There was postoperative improvement of the all functional outcome measures (MMWS, VAS, ROM, and power grip). All the patients returned to their previous activities with no reported intra- or postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The described outside-in technique is safe and effective technique for repair of EWAS 1 TFCC tear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, case series, level IV.

What Is the Effect of the Ulnar-Plus Variance on the Outcomes of Arthroscopic Repair of the Peripheral Ulnar-Side Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear?

PURPOSE

To compare the outcomes of arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears between patients with and without ulnar-plus variance (UPV) and to identify factors associated with index surgery failure in these patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears from June 2014 to February 2018. We selected patients who were aged at least 18 years and underwent arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears. We excluded those with a fractured or dislocated wrist, ulnar impaction syndrome, degenerative or inflammatory arthritis of the wrist, or neurologic conditions that affect upper-extremity function, as well as those who received less than 12 months' follow-up. We evaluated the patients with a visual analog scale for pain in 3 domains (overall, with hard work, and at rest), the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation, range of motion, and grip strength. Clinical outcomes and arthroscopic findings were compared between patients with and without UPV (UPV group and non-UPV group, respectively). We calculated the relative risk and 95% confidence interval for younger age (<30 years), sex, UPV, and coexisting degenerative central TFCC tear (type 2 tear) to determine the risk factors for arthroscopic repair failure.

RESULTS

No significant differences were noted between the 2 groups regarding visual analog scale pain and Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation scores and rates of excellent or improved outcomes (P > .05). Arthroscopic repair failure was found in 4 patients. A coexisting type 2 TFCC tear was the only significant risk factor (relative risk, 49.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.94-83.96; P = .007) for arthroscopic repair failure.

CONCLUSIONS

UPV did not significantly affect the outcomes of arthroscopic repair of peripheral ulnar-side TFCC tears. However, coexisting type 2 TFCC tears significantly increased the risk of index surgery failure in these patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, prognostic study.

Long-Term Outcomes of All-Arthroscopic Pre-Tied Suture Device Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Repair

Background  A pre-tied suture device has been utilized for all-arthroscopic peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repairs with promising early clinical results. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term functional outcomes of these repairs. Patients and Methods  A retrospective review of patients undergoing arthroscopic TFCC repair was performed. Inclusion criteria were the Palmer type 1B TFCC tears diagnosed on arthroscopy and repaired using the all-arthroscopic pre-tied suture device. Patients with any evidence of concomitant wrist injury at the time of surgery, history of prior wrist surgery, or nonrepairable and nonperipheral TFCC tears were excluded. Postoperative complications, range of motion, grip strength, and outcome assessments were recorded for each patient. Results  Eleven patients (mean age, 36 years; range, 20-64 years) satisfied our inclusion criteria and comprised the study cohort. The mean follow-up period was 7.0 years (range, 4.3-10.9 years). Mean range of motion of the wrist revealed flexion of 76 ± 11 degrees and extension of 73 ± 12 degrees. Mean grip strength was 98 ± 15% of the nonsurgical extremity. QuickDASH, modified Mayo, and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) average scores were 9 ± 8, 80 ± 6, and 12 ± 12, respectively. No surgical complications were observed and no patient required any further surgical intervention. Conclusions  Our cohort of patients following all-arthroscopic pre-tied suture device repair of isolated Palmer type 1B TFCC tears demonstrated excellent clinical function at a mean follow-up of 7 years. These findings indicate that the pre-tied suture device is a reliable, safe, effective, and most importantly, durable treatment option for repair of peripheral TFCC tears. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV, therapeutic study.

What is the Natural History of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tear Without Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability?

BACKGROUND

The triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear is a common cause of ulnar-side wrist pain; however, its natural course is not well understood.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We sought (1) to determine the natural course of TFCC tears without distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability, and (2) to identify the factors associated with poor prognosis after nonsurgical treatment of TFCC tears.

METHODS

Over a 3-year period, we treated 117 patients with TFCC tears who did not have DRUJ instability. The diagnosis was made on the basis of ulnar-sided wrist pain, a positive ulnocarpal stress test or ulnar grinding test, and identification of a tear on MRI or CT arthrography. Of those, 25 were excluded during the initial evaluation period because they met the previously defined indications of surgery on the basis of clinical history. Another 19 patients (20%) were lost to followup before 6 months, and one patient was excluded because of prior wrist surgery, leaving 72 wrists in 72 patients for analysis in this retrospective study, which drew data from a review of electronic medical records of one institution. The group consisted of 42 men and 30 women, with a mean age of 40 years (range, 18-70 years). The study group was followed for a mean of 16 months (range, 6 to 36 months). We evaluated the pain VAS and patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) at the initial visit, at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and at more than 6 months after the initial visit. A PRWE score ≤ 20 points indicated complete recovery, and a PRWE score more than 20 points was considered an incomplete recovery. We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression modelling to estimate the time to complete recovery and to identify factors associated with incomplete recovery among the seven possible factors of older age (≥ 45 years), male, obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m), dominant-hand involvement, chronic symptoms (≥ 6 months), traumatic tear, and ulnar-plus variance.

RESULTS

The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that estimated cumulative incidence of complete recovery was 30% (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-40) at 6 months and 50% (95% CI, 39-61) at 1 year. We could not find any risk factors among the seven candidate factors, including older age (hazard ratio [HR], 0.608; 95% CI, 0.34-1.087; p = 0.093), male (HR, 1.152; 95% CI, 0.667-1.991; p = 0.612), obesity (HR, 1.433; 95% CI, 0.603-3.402; p = 0.415), dominant hand involvement (HR, 1.808; 95% CI, 0.927-3.527; p = 0.082), chronic symptoms (HR, 0.763; 95% CI, 0.443-1.922; p = 0.133), traumatic tear (HR, 0.756; 95% CI, 0.432-1.32; p = 0.325), and ulnar plus variance (HR, 0.804; 95% CI, 0.461-1.404; p = 0.443).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that nonsurgical treatment is moderately successful for treating patients with TFCC tears without DRUJ instability. We recommend a minimum of 6 months nonsurgical treatment as the first-line treatment for this injury. Future studies are necessary to clarify predictors of persistent pain with nonsurgical treatment to avoid an unnecessary surgical delay.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Arthroscopic Management of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Peripheral Injury

Patients suffering from ulnar-sided wrist pain after trauma may develop tenderness, clicking, a positive fovea sign, or instability of the distal radioulnar joint. If the pain is persistent, conservative treatment does not help, and the patient agrees to surgery, arthroscopy may reveal a triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) injury with capsular detachment, foveal avulsion, or a combination thereof. Capsular reattachment is possible using an arthroscopic assisted technique. The reattachment can be performed with an inside-out, outside-in, or all-inside technique, providing good to excellent results, which tend to persist over time, in 60% to 90% of cases.

Arthroscopic Management of Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Foveal Injury

The deep component of triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) inserts onto the fovea of the ulnar head. This component is critical to provide distal radioulnar joint stability. The surgical techniques and results of transosseous inside-out TFCC foveal repair are discussed. The rewarding results encouraged the repair of TFCC to the fovea arthroscopically. Although the results are good, the factors of age (traumatic or degenerative) and quality of stump and TFCC proper, which relate to the results should be considered in the future.

Safety analysis of all-inside arthroscopic repair of peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether an all-inside peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair using the FasT-Fix device (Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, Andover, MA) is safe by measuring the proximity of the anchors to ulnar-sided anatomic structures.

METHODS

Eleven fresh-frozen cadaveric wrists were thawed and placed in traction. Under direct arthroscopic visualization, an all-inside arthroscopic peripheral TFCC repair was completed by placing a single FasT-Fix device in a vertical mattress fashion. The wrists were then dissected to visualize the 2 anchors. The distance between these anchors and the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), and dorsal branch of the ulnar sensory nerve (DBUN) were measured with digital calipers and recorded.

RESULTS

The peripheral anchor averaged 4.2 mm (range, 0 to 14 mm) from the ECU tendon, 3.8 mm (range, 0 to 9 mm) from the DBUN, and 8.3 mm (range, 1 to 15 mm) from the FCU tendon. The central anchor averaged 9.6 mm (range, 2 to 15 mm) from the ECU tendon, 6.8 mm (range, 1 to 13 mm) from the DBUN, and 7.6 mm (range, 1 to 13 mm) from the FCU tendon.

CONCLUSIONS

This study exposes some safety concerns with the all-inside peripheral TFCC repair using the FasT-Fix device, which was found to reside in close proximity to the ECU, FCU, and DBUN. In multiple wrists the anchors were noted to underlie the anatomic structure that we measured, making it possible to pierce these structures with the needle before deployment of the anchor.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Though technically feasible, all-inside arthroscopic repair of the peripheral TFCC risks injury to the ulnar-sided anatomy.

Management of peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex tears in the ulnar positive patient: arthroscopic repair versus ulnar shortening osteotomy

PURPOSE

One pattern of injury to the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) is a traumatic peripheral tear located at the ulnar end of the TFCC. Since 1989, this specific injury has been classified as a Palmer type 1B lesion. Various treatment options have been described for 1B injuries, yet when there is coexistent ulnar positive variance, it can make the choice of treatment difficult. The purpose of this article is to help the surgeon decide how to treat type 1B lesions in ulnar positive patients by directly comparing arthroscopic repair (repair) to ulnar shortening osteotomy (USO). The null hypothesis was that repair and USO would provide equivalent postoperative improvement with regard to motion; Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; visual analog scale (VAS) score; and grip strength.

METHODS

We tested our hypothesis by retrospectively reviewing prospectively collected data from 51 patients treated surgically between 2000 and 2006 with type 1B tears in the setting of ulnar positive variance. Of these 51 patients, 27 were treated with arthroscopic repair and 24 with USO. All patients were evaluated before surgery as well as at final follow-up for active range of motion measurements, grip strength, DASH score, and VAS score. Radiographs were taken of all patients before surgery to confirm the presence of ulnar positive variance, and after surgery in the USO group to evaluate for bony union.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, we found no statistically significant difference between the repair and USO groups with regard to flexion, extension, pronation, supination, radial deviation, or ulnar deviation. Likewise, there was no significant difference in grip strength, DASH scores, or VAS scores. When analyzing each cohort individually, both groups improved significantly after surgery with regard to DASH score, VAS score, and wrist extension. There was also a trend toward improved motion in all other directions except for an insignificant decrease in postoperative pronation in the repair group. Two patients in the USO group required additional surgery, with one revision performed for nonunion and one for painful hardware, which caused extensor carpi ulnaris tendonitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our study suggest that type 1B TFCC tears in the ulnar positive patient can be managed equivalently well with repair or USO.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Ulnar shortening after TFCC suture repair of Palmer type 1B lesions

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine functional and subjective outcomes of an ulnar shortening procedure elected by patients who experienced persistent ulno-carpal symptoms following arthroscopic suture repair of a Palmer type 1B lesion. All patients had a dynamic ulna positive variance.

METHODS

Five patients (3 males and 2 females) with arthroscopic repair of Palmer type 1B tears who subsequently underwent ulnar shortening were reviewed. At the time of the arthroscopic repair the patients' average age was 37 +/- 13 years (range 16-52 years). Average time to follow-up was 14 +/- 6 months (range 10-23 months). The average age was 38 +/- 14 years (range 17-53 years) when the ulnar shortening was performed. The second follow-up took place 7 +/- 2 months (range 5-9 months) after ulnar shortening. During the follow-ups, range of motion, grip strength, pain, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, DASH Score, and ulnar length were evaluated. Citing persistent ulno-carpal symptoms, the patients elected ulnar shortening an average of 17 +/- 7months (range 13-29 months) following the arthroscopic repair. Prior to ulnar shortening the average static ulnar variance was 0.2 +/- 1.3 mm (range -1 to 2 mm), the average dynamic ulnar variance was 1.4 +/- 0.5 mm (range 1 to 2 mm).

RESULTS

Ulnar shortening brought about further reduction in pain after the arthroscopic repair of the triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) had already reduced it. As measured by a visual analogue scale, the average value after ulnar shortening was 2.2 +/- 2.1 (range 0.7-5.0). The average static ulnar variance was -3.4 +/- 2 mm (range -5 to -1 mm). Patients were very satisfied with the results of the ulnar shortening and four out of five indicated that it had significantly improved their symptoms and they would elect ulnar shortening again. Postoperative range of motion as a percentage of the contralateral side averaged 90% for the extension/flexion arc, 80% for the radial/ulnar deviation arc, and 100% for the pronation/supination arc of motion. In addition, there was an improvement in grip strength. The Modified Mayo Wrist Score was rated excellent in three patients, and fair in two patients. The average DASH score was 22 +/- 22 (range 0-53).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who have a dynamic ulna positive variance and experience persistent ulno-carpal symptoms following arthroscopic suture repair of a Palmer type 1B lesion, benefit from an ulnar shortening procedure. Shortening the ulna can improve these patients' symptoms of pain, range of motion, and grip strength.

Arthroscopic repair of Palmer 1B triangular fibrocartilage complex tears

PURPOSE

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine functional and subjective outcomes of patients with Palmer type 1B tears repaired arthroscopically and to investigate whether clinical outcomes are related to ulna length.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with arthroscopic repair of Palmer type 1B tears were reviewed. There were 23 males and 23 females. The average age was 34 years (range, 10 to 58 yrs). The average follow-up was 11 months (range, 6 to 23 mos), and the delay to surgery was 9.7 months. All patients suffered ulnar-sided wrist pain and were diagnosed with Palmer type 1B tears. The tear was repaired arthroscopically with an inside-outside suture technique. The range of motion (ROM), grip strength, pain, wrist score (modified Mayo wrist score), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score, and ulna length (static and dynamic) were evaluated.

RESULTS

There was a reduction in pain and an improvement in grip strength. Postoperative ROM averaged 128 degrees +/- 23 degrees for the extension/flexion arc, 41 degrees +/- 11 degrees for the radial/ulnar deviation arc, and 171 degrees +/- 19 degrees for the pronation/supination arc of motion. However, no relation could be found between ulna length and clinical outcome. The modified Mayo wrist score was rated excellent in 22% of patients, good in 41%, fair in 27%, and poor in 10%. The average DASH score was 21.70 +/- 17.17 (range, 0 to 58.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic repair of Palmer type 1B tears yields satisfactory results. Sixty-three percent of patients achieved good to excellent results, experienced increased ROM, grip strength, and pain relief. Ulnar neutral or positive variance is not a contraindication for suture repair and does not require simultaneous ulna shortening when repairing the triangular fibrocartilage complex arthroscopically. A delay to surgery did not affect clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic case series.