Arthroscopic arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement gives moderate improvements in range of motion and functional knee scores

Outcomes of Liner Exchange Versus Component Revision for the Treatment of Stiffness Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with liner exchange (LE) versus component revision (CRev) for stiffness post-TKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified all rTKA performed for stiffness after primary TKA using our institutional database (2003 to 2021). Cases with infection, loosening, or < 2 years follow-up were excluded. There were 129 rTKA included, 91 in the LE, and 38 in the CRev cohorts. The mean follow-up was 8.5 years (range, 2 to 21). The LE and CRev cohorts had similar baseline demographics (P > 0.05), previous manipulation (P = 0.45), time from primary TKA (P = 0.14), and pre-rTKA arc of motion (AOM) (P = 0.08). The primary outcomes were the achievement of a successful range of movement (ROM), defined as flexion ≥ 90° with an extension deficit of ≤ 10° and AOM improvement. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare survival free from rerevision between cohorts.

RESULTS

For the entire cohort, 69% achieved a successful ROM, and the mean AOM improved (P < 0.001). Achievement of successful ROM was comparable between LE (72%) and CRev (62%) cohorts (P = 0.29). The mean gain in AOM was similar between LE (24.9°) and CRev (25.4°) cohorts (P = 0.45). Preoperative extension deficit was associated with poorer outcomes (P = 0.006). The 10-year rerevision-free survival was similar between the LE (86.2%) and CRev (81.1%) cohorts (P = 0.55). Survival from rerevision for stiffness at 10 years was also similar (P = 0.6). The CRev group had increased surgical times (P < 0.0001), blood loss (P < 0.0001), and length of stay (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

An LE resulted in similar achievement of a successful ROM and rerevision-free survival compared with CRev. In properly selected patients, LE is a reasonable option for the treatment of stiffness after TKA.

Treatment of arthrofibrosis and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: an updated review of the literature

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the increased utilization of value-based models, it is important to determine the most effective treatments that will reduce the need for further intervention and additional expenditure. A systematic review was performed to compare the outcomes of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (aLOA), and revision TKA (rTKA) for arthrofibrosis and stiffness following TKA.

METHODS

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were reviewed for articles published through October 2020. Studies were included if they reported patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA, aLOA, or rTKA. The primary endpoint was PROMs, while secondary outcomes included range of motion and the percentage of patients who pursued further treatment for stiffness.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included: 21 on rTKA, 7 on aLOA, and 14 on MUA. The mean or median post-operative arc ROM was > 90° in 6/20 (30%) rTKA, 5/7 (71%) aLOA, and 7/10 (70%) MUA studies. Post-operative Knee Society (KSS) clinical and functional scores were the greatest in patients who underwent MUA and aLOA. As many as 43% of rTKA patients required further care compared to 25% of aLOA and 17% of MUA patients.

CONCLUSION

Stiffness following TKA remains a challenging condition to treat. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that patients who undergo rTKA have poorer clinical outcomes and a greater need for further treatment compared to patients who undergo MUA or aLOA.

Efficacy of Arthroscopic Arthrolysis in the Treatment of Arthrofibrosis: A Systematic Review

Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a clinical challenge for health care professionals. Historically, arthroscopic arthrolysis is a treatment modality that has been reserved for patients that have failed other conservative modalities, including manipulation under anesthesia. However, a systematic review of the literature evaluating the clinical efficacy and complications of arthroscopic arthrolysis for stiffness after TKA has not been performed. A systematic review of medical databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library) was undertaken for articles published from January 1980 to October 2018. A descriptive and critical analysis of the results was performed. From 1,326 studies, 7 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study. A total of 160 patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis for arthrofibrosis following TKA were included for analysis. The quality of the evidence for the included studies ranged between moderate and high. Overall, patients had significant increased range of motion and flexion by 32.5 and 26.7 degrees, respectively following arthroscopic arthrolysis. Functional outcome scores also significantly improved for patients who underwent arthroscopic arthrolysis after TKA. Arthroscopic arthrolysis is an efficacious modality for treatment of stiffness following TKA. The greatest benefit is seen among patients that present with significant loss of flexion. Arthroscopic arthrolysis should be reserved for patients that have previously failed more conservative modalities.

Etiopathology and Management of Stiff Knees: A Current Concept Review

BACKGROUND

Knee stiffness after trauma, fracture fixation, arthroscopic surgery, infection, and knee arthroplasty is a known complication, which is challenging to manage and causes significant disability to the patients.

METHODS

We did a comprehensive search on the stiff knees, in the last week of May 2020, from the search engines of PubMed, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and Research Gates using the appropriate keywords.

RESULTS

We found two types of articles related to knees stiffness: (a) following trauma, internal and external fixation of fractures and arthroscopic surgery, and (b) following total knee arthroplasty. Arthroscopic surgery was found to be a favored mode of management of stiff knees in both of the above groups. The Manipulation under Anesthesia (MUA) was also found effective if done carefully and in the early course of the stiffness.

CONCLUSION

Knee stiffness due to any cause is a trouble proposition to both patients and treating surgeons. Various methods of management have been described to deal with knee stiffness. Amongst the operative treatment, MUA and arthroscopic surgery were found to be the most effective. Arthroscopic surgery offers a good option of release stiff knees in the majority of cases, and it is most valuable and effective if done earlier in the course of the stiffness (preferably between 3 and 6 months).

Can adjunctive perioperative radiation improve range of motion after total knee revision for arthrofibrosis?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty revision (TKRev) can be performed to treat chronic arthrofibrosis. Low-dose irradiation may decrease fibro-osseous proliferation of soft tissue; therefore, it may be effective at increasing range of motion (ROM) after TKRev. Our hypothesis is that low-dose radiation administered in the immediate postoperative period leads to increased ROM after TKRev for arthrofibrosis.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted from 2008-2015 on 26 patients who underwent TKRev for treating chronic arthrofibrosis. Fifteen patients (XRT group) received 800 cGy radiation within 48 hours after TKRev and 11 patients (CTL group) did not. Measurements of extension, flexion, and total arc of ROM were performed preoperatively and at one, six, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

ROM improved from 14.3° extension, 69.0° flexion, and 54.7° total ROM preoperatively, to 3.3° extension, 94.0° flexion, and 90.7° total ROM postoperatively in the XRT group. ROM improved from 18.6° extension, 85.9° flexion, and 67.3° total ROM preoperatively to 4.1° extension, 102.5° flexion, and 98.5° total ROM postoperatively in the CTL group. The 1-year overall improvement in extension (12.5°), flexion (21.4°), and total ROM (33.9°) vs preoperative ROM was significant for all measurements (p < 0.001). The 8.4° improvement in flexion (25.0° vs 16.6°, p = 0.10) in the XRT group vs the CTL group approached, but did not reach significance.

CONCLUSIONS

TKRev for arthrofibrosis showed significant improvement in extension, flexion, and total ROM at one year. The use of low dose irradiation showed promise with improved flexion, but the result did not reach statistical significance in this small sample of patients.

Anti-fibrotic effects of the antihistamine ketotifen in a rabbit model of arthrofibrosis

Aims

Arthrofibrosis is a relatively common complication after joint injuries and surgery, particularly in the knee. The present study used a previously described and validated rabbit model to assess the biomechanical, histopathological, and molecular effects of the mast cell stabilizer ketotifen on surgically induced knee joint contractures in female rabbits.

Methods

A group of 12 skeletally mature rabbits were randomly divided into two groups. One group received subcutaneous (SQ) saline, and a second group received SQ ketotifen injections. Biomechanical data were collected at eight, ten, 16, and 24 weeks. At the time of necropsy, posterior capsule tissue was collected for histopathological and gene expression analyses (messenger RNA (mRNA) and protein).

Results

At the 24-week timepoint, there was a statistically significant increase in passive extension among rabbits treated with ketotifen compared to those treated with saline (p = 0.03). However, no difference in capsular stiffness was detected. Histopathological data failed to demonstrate a decrease in the density of fibrous tissue or a decrease in α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) staining with ketotifen treatment. In contrast, tryptase and α-SMA protein expression in the ketotifen group were decreased when compared to saline controls (p = 0.007 and p = 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, there was a significant decrease in α-SMA (ACTA2) gene expression in the ketotifen group compared to the control group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Collectively, these data suggest that ketotifen mitigates the severity of contracture formation in a rabbit model of arthrofibrosis.

Low-grade infections as a possible cause of arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty represents a considerable burden for the patient and a therapeutic challenge for the practitioner. One possible cause discussed in the literature is a low-grade infection. This hypothesis should be examined within the scope of this retrospective study.

Patients and methods

Nineteen patients with clinical symptoms of arthrofibrosis after primary total knee arthroplasty were examined between January, 1999 and January, 2012. Incorrect positioning was radiologically ruled out. All patients were examined clinically (score of Freeman as well as Blauth and Jäger), radiologically (component and leg alignment, patella height according to Insall and Salvati), microbiologically (culture-based procedures), molecular biologically (PCR) and histologically in the course of an open revision of the prosthesis.

Results

According to the score of Freeman et al. (1977), a highly significant improvement in pain (p = 0.007) and in the overall score (p = 0.003) was shown. The knee joint mobility did not change significantly (p = 0.795). PCR was negative in 17 patients. One patient showed a PCR-positive result of the synovial membrane for Corynebacterium spp., while Staphylococcus warneri was detected in the culture. Another patient had a positive result of synovia PCR for Enterococcus cecorum as well as Corynebacterium spp. However, this culture was sterile. In 16 patient samples, no bacterial growth was detectable. Two samples were not evaluable. The main histopathological findings were synovialitis and fibrosis.

Conclusion

The hypothesis of low-grade-infection-induced arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty could not be confirmed in this study. However, based on this small study population the conclusion needs to be confirmed by new and larger studies, ideally prospectively designed including a control group.

Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Management of the severely stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging, with the outcome of revision arthroplasty being inferior compared to the outcome for other indications. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome after revision TKA with hinged-type implants for severely stiff TKA [range of motion (ROM) ≤ 70°] at 2 years.

METHODS

A cohort of 38 patients with a hinged-type revision TKA (Waldemar Link or RT-Plus) and preoperative ROM ≤ 70° were selected from a prospectively collected database. ROM, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction and Knee Society Score (KSS) were obtained preoperatively and at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years. Pre- and postoperative outcome were compared at 2 years.

RESULTS

There was a significant increase in ROM and KSS. VAS pain scores did not differ significantly. The median ROM at 2 years was 90° (range 50°-125°) with a median gain of 45° (range 5°-105°). Median VAS pain was 28.5 (range 0-96) points and median VAS satisfaction was 72 (range 0-100) points at 2 years. Twelve patients suffered a complication. Recurrent stiff knee was the most frequently reported complication (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

Hinged-type revision TKA following a severely stiff TKA renders a significant, although moderate, clinical improvement at 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series. Level IV.

Outcomes and Predictors of Success for Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions for the Stiff Total Knee Arthroplasty

A stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can manifest as pain and decreased range of motion (ROM). When conservative management including physical therapy and manipulation under anesthesia fails, arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (LOA) is frequently pursued. The authors examined the efficacy of LOA for the stiff TKA. They retrospectively reviewed the records of 18 patients who underwent LOA for stiff TKA between April 2013 and June 2016 and who failed to meet 90° ROM at 6 weeks postoperatively. They recorded patient demographics, ROM prior to TKA, and incidence of manipulation under anesthesia between initial TKA and LOA as well as pre- and postoperative outcomes of ROM, pain, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores. The mean time from TKA to LOA was 117 days, with a mean follow-up of 449 days. Mean improvements in ROM flexion contracture, flexion, and arc were 6.11° (P<.05), 29.45° (P<.001), and 35.56° (P<.001), respectively. Range of motion improved for 17 of 18 patients. The WOMAC was completed by 15 of 18 patients, with a mean improvement in scores of 32.23% (P<.001); all 15 patients with available WOMAC scores improved. Pain score improved by a mean of 2.17 (P<.001), with 14 of 18 patients reporting decreased pain. Improvements in flexion contracture, flexion, ROM arc, WOMAC scores, and pain were all statistically significant (P<.05). Age, weight, body mass index, and time to LOA were found to be statistically significant predictors of outcome. Finally, pre-TKA and pre-LOA ROM parameters were found to be statistically significant predictors of post-LOA ROM outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(6):e1062-e1068.].

Predictors of outcome after manipulation under anaesthesia in patients with a stiff total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Flexion in a stiff total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be improved by manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). Although this intervention usually results in an improvement in range of motion, the expected result is not always achieved. The purpose of this study is to determine which factors affect range of motion after manipulation in patients with a stiff total knee.

METHODS

After exclusion (n = 22), the data of 158 patients (138 knees) with a stiff knee after TKA who received a manipulation under anaesthesia between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively analysed. Pre-, peri- and post-operative variables were identified and examined for their influence on flexion after the manipulation using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests and Spearman correlations.

RESULTS

After MUA, a mean improvement in flexion of 30.3° was observed at the final follow-up. Preoperative TKA flexion, design of TKA and interval between TKA procedure and MUA were positive associated with an increase in flexion after MUA. MUA performed 12 weeks or more after TKA procedure deteriorated the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Three factors, pre-TKA flexion type of prosthesis and interval between TKA procedure and manipulation under anaesthesia, were found to have impact on flexion after TKA and MUA were identified. Results are expected to be inferior in patients with low flexion before TKA procedure or with a long interval (>12 weeks) between the TKA procedure and the manipulation under anaesthesia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Revision surgery for the stiff total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

The aim of this study was to examine the results of revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) undertaken for stiffness in the absence of sepsis or loosening.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We present the results of revision surgery for stiff TKA in 48 cases (35 (72.9%) women and 13 (27.1%) men). The mean age at revision surgery was 65.5 years (42 to 83). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Stiffness was defined as an arc of flexion of < 70° or a flexion contracture of > 15°. The changes in the range of movement (ROM) and the Western Ontario and McMasters Osteoarthritis index scores (WOMAC) were recorded.

RESULTS

At a mean follow up of 59.9 months (12 to 272) there was a mean improvement in arc of movement of 45.0°. Mean flexion improved from 54.4° (5° to 100°) to 90° (10° to 125°) (p < 0.05) and the mean flexion contracture decreased from 12.0° (0° to 45°) to 3.5° (0° to 25°) (p < 0.05). The mean WOMAC scores improved for pain, stiffness and function. In patients with extreme stiffness we describe a novel technique, which we have called the 'sloppy' revision. This entails downsizing the polyethylene insert by 4 mm and using a more constrained liner to retain stability.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is the largest series of revision surgeries for stiffness reported in the literature where infection and loosening have been excluded.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Whilst revision surgery is technically demanding, improvements in ROM and outcome can be achieved, particularly when the revision is within two years of the primary surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:622-7.

Timing of manipulation under anaesthesia for stiffness after total knee arthroplasty

Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a debilitating condition for the patient with limitation of functional outcome. There are various causes of stiffness, which can be classified as pre-operative, per-operative and post-operative. Arthrofibrosis is one of the causes, which can be managed in different ways, and manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) is routinely performed as the first line of management. The timing of MUA is often debated. We review the paper by Issa et al., which looks at the effect of timing of manipulation on a stiff TKA. They conclude that early manipulation within 12 weeks of performing the TKA had a higher mean flexion gain (36.5°), higher final range of motion (ROM) (119°) and higher knee society score (89 points) compared to those performed after 12 weeks which were 17°, 95° and 84 points respectively. Other studies have also reinforced the idea that early manipulation within 12 weeks has a better outcome than those performed after 12 weeks. There may still be a benefit of manipulation until 26 weeks after which open arthrolysis may be needed to improve ROM.

Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for the stiff total knee arthroplasty

The management of the stiff knee after total knee arthroplasty is controversial. Manipulation under anesthesia and open lysis of adhesions are techniques that can theoretically address the fibrous scar tissue, but their efficacy has been shown to be variable. We describe the technique of arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for the stiff knee after total knee arthroplasty. The advantages of this technique include minimally invasive debridement of scar tissue within defined compartments of the knee and evaluation for the presence and treatment of focal lesions (e.g., loose bodies or impinging synovial or soft tissue). The total arc of motion can be improved with a systematic arthroscopic approach.

Management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

AIM

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the outcome of four main modalities of treatment for arthrofibrosis that develops subsequent to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA), namely manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic debridement, open surgical release and revision TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computerised search was conducted for relevant studies published from 1975 onwards in all the major databases and various search engines. A total of twenty-five studies were selected, representing a total of 798 patients. Studies that passed the inclusion criteria were then subjected to quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. On assessment, the 25 studies scored a total of 77 stars out of a possible 125. Two studies were prospective in design, while the remaining case series were retrospective in nature. The primary outcome measures assessed were increase in range of movement (ROM) and the Knee Society Score (KSS) at final follow-up.

RESULTS

Our results showed that manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) had a mean increase in ROM of 38.4°, arthroscopic release had a mean increase of 36.2°, open surgical release had a mean increase of 43.4° and revision TKA had a mean increase of 24.7°. No significant differences were found in the KSS of the four treatment modalities. Our analysis suggests that open surgical release would be the most beneficial option for patients who are fit to undergo secondary surgery if their lifestyle requires a higher ROM for activities of daily living. However, there were methodological limitations as majority of the papers were case series, which decreased the quality of the evidence available.