Predisposing factors which are relevant for the clinical outcome after revision total knee arthroplasty

Porous Tantalum Tibial Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Excellent 10-Year Survivorship

BACKGROUND

Highly porous metal tibial metaphyseal cones (TMCs) are commonly utilized in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to address bone loss and obtain biologic fixation. Mid-term (5 to 10 year) studies have previously demonstrated excellent survivorship and high rates of osseointegration, but longer-term studies are lacking. We aimed to assess long-term (≥ 10 year) implant survivorship, complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes after revision TKA with TMCs.

METHODS

Between 2004 and 2011, 228 revision TKAs utilizing porous tantalum TMCs with stemmed tibial components were performed at a single institution and were retrospectively reviewed. The mean age at revision was 65 years, the mean body mass index was 33, and 52% were women. Implant survivorship, complications, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. The mean follow-up was 6.3 years.

RESULTS

The 10-year survivorship free of aseptic loosening leading to TMC removal was 97%, free of any TMC removal was 88%, free of any re-revision was 66%, and free of any reoperation was 58%. The most common indications for re-revision were periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and aseptic femoral component loosening. The 10-year nonoperative complication rate was 24%. The mean Knee Society scores increased from 38 preoperatively to 69 at 10 years. There were 8 knees that had evidence of partial, progressive tibial radiolucencies at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Porous tantalum TMCs demonstrated persistently durable longer-term survivorship with a low rate of implant removal. The rare implant removals for component loosening or instability were offset by those required for periprosthetic joint infection, which accounted for 80% of cone removals. Porous tantalum TMCs provide an extremely reliable tool to address tibial bone loss and achieve durable long-term fixation in revision TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effect of ascending and descending medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy on patella height and functional outcomes-a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a popular joint-preserving option for medial compartmental osteoarthritis. However, this is associated with alterations in the patellar height (PH) and tibial slope (TS). This study aims to compare the effect of ascending (AMHTO) and descending medial opening wedge HTO (DMHTO) on patella height, posterior tibial slope and functional outcomes.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted between February 2018 and July 2021. Patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis, varus alignment, and complete pre- and postoperative lateral and full-length anteroposterior radiographs were included. Pre- and postoperative radiological measurements include the Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), the mechanical axis deviation (MAD), and the posterior tibial slope. The functional outcomes were measured using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Lysholm Knee Score (LKS), and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). The osteotomy union was checked with serial X-rays every 6 weeks till a satisfactory union was achieved.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included in the study. Thirty-four (58%) patients received AMHTO, and 24 (42%) received DMHTO. There was no baseline difference in the demographic variables or functional scores between the two groups. The preoperative mean MAD of - 9.65° ± 3.67° was corrected significantly to + 0.08 ± 2.80° (varus -, valgus + , P = 0.034). A significant difference in preoperative and postoperative CDI of 0.93 ± 0.45 and 0.83 ± 0.27, respectively, was noted (P = 0.023). In the AMHTO group, a statistically significant decrease in PH from preoperative 1.03 ± 0.77 to 0.84 ± 0.12 was noted (P = 0.003). There was a significant improvement in functional outcomes between baseline and 9-month follow-up in both groups. There was no significant difference between the functional outcomes of the two groups at 9-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The study confirmed our hypothesis that descending HTO caused less alteration in the patella height compared to ascending HTO. There is no significant difference in the functional outcomes between the groups. However, in patients with PFOA, and when attempting higher degree of correction through AMHTO, the possibility of worsening of symptoms due to change in PH must be considered.

Return to work following revision knee arthroplasty in patients under 65 years of age: A retrospective study

Background

Little is known about employment following revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). This study aims to describe factors associated with returning to employment in patients of working age who underwent RTKA surgery.

Methods

We performed a retrospective assessment of all patients aged ≤65 who underwent RTKA at our NHS institution between 2006 and 2020. All indications and revision procedures were included. Pre-operative demographics, indication for surgery and Oxford Knee Scores (OKS) were recorded. Postal questionnaires were sent to patients including patient reported outcome measures and a departmental questionnaire asking patients about employment status pre- and post-operatively.

Results

132 procedures were performed in 113 patients. Median follow up was 5.5 years (2.4-9.0). Mean age was 58 (5.8) and 50% (57) were men. 62 patients undergoing 74 procedures responded to postal questionnaires and were included in the study. 53% (33) were employed prior to surgery and 61% (38) returned to work at a median of 12 weeks (3-150). Of the 24 who did not return to work, 7 reported intending to return to work. Those patients who returned to work had increased pre-operative OKS (16.9 vs 13.6) and mean improvement (16.5 vs 12.4).

Conclusion

This study is limited by small numbers and its observational nature. In this population the majority of patients who wished to return to work after RTKA were able to do so. This provides some reassurance when counselling patients. Prospective studies to better understand the factors that predict return to work will be important with increasing demands from surgery.

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty Revisions in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patient Populations

BACKGROUND

The obese population is at higher risk for complications following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but little data is available regarding revision outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the role of body mass index (BMI) in the cause for revision TKA and whether BMI classification is predictive of outcomes.

METHODS

A multi-institutional database was generated, including revision TKAs from 2012 to 2019. Data collection included demographics, comorbidities, surgery types (primary revision, repeat revision), reasons for revision, lengths of hospital stay, and surgical times. Patients were compared using 3 BMI categories: nonobese (18.5 to 29.9), obese (30 to 39.9), and morbidly obese (≥40). Categorical and continuous variables were analyzed using chi-square and 1-way analysis of variance tests, respectively. Regression analyses were used to compare reasons for revision among weight classes.

RESULTS

Obese and morbidly obese patients showed significant risk for repeat revision surgery in comparison to normal weight patients. Obese patients were at higher risk for primary revision due to stiffness/fibrosis and repeat revision due to malposition. In comparison to the obese population, morbidly obese patients were more likely to require primary revision for dislocation and implant loosening.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in primary and repeat revision etiologies exist among weight classes. Furthermore, obese and morbidly obese patients have a greater risk of requiring repeat revision surgery. These patients should be informed of their risk for multiple operations, and surgeons should be aware of the differences in revision etiologies when anticipating complications following primary TKA.

Patient-relevant outcomes following elective, aseptic revision knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of revision knee arthroplasty (rKA) compared to non-operative treatment for the management of patients with elective, aseptic causes for a failed knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, AMED and PsychINFO were searched from inception to 1st December 2020 for studies on patients considering elective, aseptic rKA. Patient-relevant outcomes (PROs) were defined as implant survivorship, joint function, quality of life (QoL), complications and hospital admission impact.

RESULTS

No studies compared elective, aseptic rKA to non-operative management. Forty uncontrolled studies reported on PROs following elective, aseptic rKA (434434 rKA). Pooled estimates for implant survivorship were: 95.5% (95% CI 93.2-97.7%) at 1 year [seven studies (5524 rKA)], 90.8% (95% CI 87.6-94.0%) at 5 years [13 studies (5754 rKA)], 87.4% (95% CI 81.7-93.1%) at 10 years [nine studies (2188 rKA)], and 83.2% (95% CI 76.7-89.7%) at 15 years [two studies (452 rKA)]. Twelve studies (2382 rKA) reported joint function and/or QoL: all found large improvements from baseline to follow-up. Mortality rates were low (0.16% to 2% within 1 year) [four studies (353064 rKA)]. Post-operative complications were common (9.1 to 37.2% at 90 days).

CONCLUSION

Higher-quality evidence is needed to support patients with decision-making in elective, aseptic rKA. This should include studies comparing operative and non-operative management. Implant survivorship following elective, aseptic rKA was ~ 96% at 1 year, ~ 91% at 5 years and ~ 87% at 10 years. Early complications were common after elective, aseptic rKA and the rates summarised here can be shared with patients during informed consent.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020196922.

A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty

To map literature on prognostic factors related to outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), to identify extensively studied factors and to guide future research into what domains need further exploration. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The search string included multiple synonyms of the following keywords: "revision TKA", "outcome" and "prognostic factor". We searched for studies assessing the association between at least one prognostic factor and at least one outcome measure after rTKA surgery. Data on sample size, study design, prognostic factors, outcomes, and the direction of the association was extracted and included in an evidence map. After screening of 5,660 articles, we included 166 studies reporting prognostic factors for outcomes after rTKA, with a median sample size of 319 patients (30 to 303,867). Overall, 50% of the studies reported prospectively collected data, and 61% of the studies were performed in a single centre. In some studies, multiple associations were reported; 180 different prognostic factors were reported in these studies. The three most frequently studied prognostic factors were reason for revision (213 times), sex (125 times), and BMI (117 times). Studies focusing on functional scores and patient-reported outcome measures as prognostic factor for the outcome after surgery were limited (n = 42). The studies reported 154 different outcomes. The most commonly reported outcomes after rTKA were: re-revision (155 times), readmission (88 times), and reinfection (85 times). Only five studies included costs as outcome. Outcomes and prognostic factors that are routinely registered as part of clinical practice (e.g. BMI, sex, complications) or in (inter)national registries are studied frequently. Studies on prognostic factors, such as functional and sociodemographic status, and outcomes as healthcare costs, cognitive and mental function, and psychosocial impact are scarce, while they have been shown to be important for patients with osteoarthritis.

Preliminary outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty using a new fixed-bearing revision knee system in Asians: a mean of 3-year follow-up

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the early outcomes of the new semi-constrained revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system by performing subgroup analysis according to the revision cause.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August 2019 to July 2020, 83 revision TKAs using the fixed-bearing Attune® revision knee system with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Clinically, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and range of motion (ROM) were evaluated. The incidence of systemic and specific postoperative complications was investigated. Each cohort was divided into septic (group A, 34 patients) and aseptic mode (group B, 41 patients), and compared to assess the outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of revision was 73.3 years (range 59.0 to 84.0 years), and the follow-up duration was 36.1 months (range 30.0 to 40.0 months). Clinical outcomes and ROM significantly improved at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Group A showed statistically inferior clinical outcomes in the last follow-up compared to group B. Four knees (5.3%) had a postoperative femoral joint line elevation of more than 5 mm. There were no serious systemic complications. One patient underwent re-revision TKA due to recurrence of infection. No stem tip impingement or cortical erosion was observed in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision TKAs using a new semi-constrained revision system showed favorable short-term follow-up outcomes, with improvement in clinical scores and ROM. Moreover, by using stem offsets, no postoperative stem tip impingement or cortical erosion was found.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Retrospective Case Series.

Accelerated discharge after aseptic revision knee arthroplasty is not associated with early readmission and reoperation

Aims

In the last decade, perioperative advancements have expanded the use of outpatient primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Despite this, there remains limited data on expedited discharge after revision TKA. This study compared 30-day readmissions and reoperations in patients undergoing revision TKA with a hospital stay greater or less than 24 hours. The authors hypothesized that expedited discharge in select patients would not be associated with increased 30-day readmissions and reoperations.

Methods

Aseptic revision TKAs in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were reviewed from 2013 to 2020. TKAs were stratified by length of hospital stay (greater or less than 24 hours). Patient demographic details, medical comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, operating time, components revised, 30-day readmissions, and reoperations were compared. Multivariate analysis evaluated predictors of discharge prior to 24 hours, 30-day readmission, and reoperation.

Results

Of 21,610 aseptic revision TKAs evaluated, 530 were discharged within 24 hours. Short-stay patients were younger (63.1 years (49 to 78) vs 65.1 years (18 to 94)), with lower BMI (32.3 kg/m2 (17 to 47) vs 33.6 kg/m2 (19 to 54) and lower ASA grades. Diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, and cancer were all associated with a hospital stay over 24 hours. Single component revisions (56.8% (n = 301) vs 32.4% (n = 6,823)), and shorter mean operating time (89.7 minutes (25 to 275) vs 130.2 minutes (30 to 517)) were associated with accelerated discharge. Accelerated discharge was not associated with 30-day readmission and reoperation.

Conclusion

Accelerated discharge after revision TKA did not increase short-term complications, readmissions, or reoperations. Further efforts to decrease hospital stays in this setting should be evaluated. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1323–1328.

Similar outcomes to primary total knee arthroplasty achievable for aseptic revision using the same primary posterior-stabilised prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 49 months

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between primary and aseptic revision TKAs using the same posterior-stabilised (PS) prosthesis. The authors hypothesised similar outcomes between both groups for selected patients.

METHODS

This retrospective, case-control study assessed 36 patients who underwent aseptic revision TKA compared to a match group of 72 primary TKA. Both groups had the same PS design implant (ANATOMIC®, Amplitude, Valence, France). The International Knee Society (IKS) score, radiological outcomes (postoperative alignment, patellar tilt and radiolucent lines), re-intervention and revision rate were compared between the two groups with a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

The final study cohort included 29 patients and 63 patients respectively in the revision and primary group, with a mean follow-up of 49.1 months (range 36.1-69). Postoperatively, there was no significant difference in IKS scores between the two groups [169.8 for the revision group and 179.6 for the primary group (p = 0.09)]. No statistical difference was observed for post-operative satisfaction 86.2% versus 92.1% (p = 0.46). Between the two groups, there was no difference in mean radiological assessment, including radiolucent lines (p = 0.7). There was no significant difference for overall implant survivorship 96.5% versus 100% (p = 0.13) at 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Similar clinical, radiological and survivorship outcomes were found between rTKA and primary TKA groups using the same PS level of constraint in patients undergoing revision surgery for aseptic indications at 3-year follow-up. Use of PS implants in rTKA for the correct indication suggests this to be a safe approach at least in the medium term.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective case-control study.

A Reliable Surgical Approach to Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Backgroud

The surgical exposure obtained in revision total knee arthroplasty should facilitate the utilisation of instrumentation and implants, including adjuncts such as stemmed prostheses, bone allograft, and artificial augments. We have previously identified within this cohort of revision total knee arthroplasty patients a high satisfaction rate of 93.5% at a mean 6.5 years of follow-up and a high level of postoperative function. We, therefore, seek to describe in detail the operative technique and perioperative care and report the early postoperative complications.

Methods

We report on the surgical approach, closure technique, and postoperative care used by the senior author for revision total knee arthroplasty procedures. The patient demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes are also reported. We aim to provide a clear description of the intraoperative technique and postoperative outcome, facilitating adoption or comparison with other surgeons or techniques. Patient inclusion criteria were revision total knee arthroplasty performed by the senior author using the PFC (Depuy) prosthesis at John Flynn Private Hospital with a minimum of 2-year postoperative follow-up. A retrospective chart review was combined with a structured telephone assessment questionnaire to assess outcomes.

Results

A total of 202 revision total knee arthroplasties were available for follow-up in 185 patients. The mean 1-year postoperative range of motion was 110°. Key features of surgical approach include incision planning, soft-tissue plane development, parapatellar scar debridement, safe removal of implants, management of bone defects, and closure technique. The overall 90-day complication rate was 9%, including 4.4% requiring manipulation under anaesthesia and 3% superficial surgical site infections (1 patient requiring intravenous antibiotics).

Conclusions

We suggest that the described technique is reproducible and reliable. It rarely requires modification and facilitates successful postoperative outcomes with a low complication rate. The adoption of this surgical technique allows surgeons to approach complex knee arthroplasty with confidence in the appropriate exposure of anatomy, facilitating subsequent steps in their arthroplasty procedures.

Treatment of arthrofibrosis and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: an updated review of the literature

PURPOSE

There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). With the increased utilization of value-based models, it is important to determine the most effective treatments that will reduce the need for further intervention and additional expenditure. A systematic review was performed to compare the outcomes of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (aLOA), and revision TKA (rTKA) for arthrofibrosis and stiffness following TKA.

METHODS

PubMed and MEDLINE databases were reviewed for articles published through October 2020. Studies were included if they reported patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA, aLOA, or rTKA. The primary endpoint was PROMs, while secondary outcomes included range of motion and the percentage of patients who pursued further treatment for stiffness.

RESULTS

A total of 40 studies were included: 21 on rTKA, 7 on aLOA, and 14 on MUA. The mean or median post-operative arc ROM was > 90° in 6/20 (30%) rTKA, 5/7 (71%) aLOA, and 7/10 (70%) MUA studies. Post-operative Knee Society (KSS) clinical and functional scores were the greatest in patients who underwent MUA and aLOA. As many as 43% of rTKA patients required further care compared to 25% of aLOA and 17% of MUA patients.

CONCLUSION

Stiffness following TKA remains a challenging condition to treat. Nonetheless, current evidence suggests that patients who undergo rTKA have poorer clinical outcomes and a greater need for further treatment compared to patients who undergo MUA or aLOA.

Epidemiology of Obese Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Understanding Demographics, Comorbidities, and Propensity Weighted Analysis of Inpatient Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Obesity is a public health epidemic that is projected to grow in coming years. Observational data on the epidemiologic profile and immediate postoperative outcomes of obesity and morbid obesity after revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) are limited.

METHODS

Discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample was used to identify patients who underwent rTKA from 2006 to 2015. Patients were stratified into morbidly obese, obese, and not obese control cohorts. An analysis was performed to compare etiology of revision, demographic and medical comorbidity profiles, and immediate in-hospital economic and complication outcomes after rTKA.

RESULTS

An estimated 605,603 rTKAs were included in this analysis. Morbidly obese and obese patients were at significantly higher risk for any complication than not obese patients. Patients with obesity were associated with an increased risk of postoperative anemia but a lower risk of peripheral vascular disease and gastrointestinal, and hematoma/seroma complications compared with not obese patients. Patients with morbid obesity were associated with an increased risk of any, hematoma/seroma, wound dehiscence, postoperative infection, pulmonary embolism, and postoperative anemia complications and a lower risk of gastrointestinal complications when compared with not obese patients. Morbidly obese patients had a significantly longer length of stay than both obese and not obese patients, while no significant difference in length of stay was observed between obese and not obese patients.

DISCUSSION

Morbidly obese patients are at higher odds for worse postoperative medical and economic outcomes compared with those with obesity after rTKA. As the number of patients with obesity and morbid obesity continues to rise, these risk factors should be considered in preoperative discussions and perioperative protocol optimization.

Clinical Outcomes Following Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Backgroud

The longer-term outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty are not well described in the current literature. Managing patient expectations of revision total knee arthroplasty can be challenging for orthopedic surgeons due to a paucity of data to guide decision-making. We present outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty performed by a single surgeon over a 12-year period from 2004 through 2015.

Methods

A retrospective review of hospital and private medical records demonstrated 202 revision total knee arthroplasties performed by the senior author in 178 patients from 2004 through 2015. Of these, 153 patients were available for assessment. Patients were contacted and invited to participate in a structured telephone interview to assess Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and patient satisfaction. All patients received the PFC (Depuy) prosthesis at a single institution and were followed up for minimum 2 years postoperatively at the time of review. Retrospective chart review was used to obtain other data for analysis including patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative range of motion (ROM), and intraoperative details.

Results

This cohort demonstrated a 93.5% survival rate and an 85% satisfaction rate at a mean of 6.5 years postoperatively. Mean ROM improved from 100° (range, 5°–145°) to 112° (range, 35°–135°) (p < 0.001). The mean OKS was 39.25 (range, 14–48). The factors associated with improved postoperative outcomes included male gender, fewer previous revision total knee arthroplasty procedures, increased preoperative ROM, and receiving a less constrained implant.

Conclusions

This study provides a comprehensive description of outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty in a large patient cohort with a long follow-up. Although revision total knee arthroplasty is a challenging and complex aspect of arthroplasty surgery, high patient satisfaction and good functional outcomes can be achieved for the majority of patients.

Outcomes in revision total knee arthroplasty (Review)

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a challenging surgical procedure. Although good results are presented, the outcomes are worse in comparison with those of primary TKA, with a higher failure rate. The main reasons for the failure of revision TKA include: sepsis, loosening and instability. There are multiple variables linked to these results, and it is difficult to determinate the exact cause as it is often a multifactorial issue. These variables may be related to the quality of the index-procedure (TKA), to the revision procedure or to patient characteristics. The purpose of this review was to highlight the outcomes of revision knee arthroplasty and main factors that may influence the results. Considerable progress has been made during the last 30 years regarding infection treatment and prevention, complex revision prosthetic design and surgical technique development. Although the outcomes have improved over time, patients who undergo revision TKA may need further re-operations in the future.

Poor outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with septic loosening compared to patients with aseptic loosening

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes, activity levels, mortalities, implant survival rates, and complications in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) of patients with septic loosening with those in patients with aseptic loosening over a minimum 10-year follow-up period.

Methods

A cohort of 78 patients (36 septic loosening and 42 aseptic loosening) was selected between January 2008 and December 2009. The functional outcomes, activity levels, mortalities, implant survival rates, and complications of revision TKA in patients with septic and aseptic loosening were compared.

Results

The mean Knee Society knee scores in the septic and aseptic groups improved from 36.7 and 37.4 preoperatively to 65.3 and 76.8 points at the final follow-up, respectively (p < 0.05). Outdoor ambulatory patients at the final follow-up included 20 of 29 (69.0%) patients in the septic group and 35 of 39 (89.7%) patients in the aseptic group (p < 0.05). The cumulative mortality rates in the septic and aseptic groups were 19.4% (7/36) and 7.1% (3/42) (p = 0.102) at final follow-up, respectively. Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis with re-revision of either component as an endpoint in the septic and aseptic groups estimated 86.5% and 95.5% chance of survival for 10 years, respectively.

Conclusions

Revision TKA in patients with septic loosening had worse functional outcomes and higher mortality over a minimum 10-year follow-up period compared with that in patients with aseptic loosening.

Level of evidence

IV.

How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? An analysis of the National Joint Registry

BACKGROUND

Knee replacements are common and effective operations but patients that undergo this intervention are at risk of needing subsequent costly and often complex revision surgery with poorer outcomes than primary surgery. The treatment pathway over the life of the patient in terms of risk of revision and re-revision(s) is poorly described. We aim to provide detailed information on the longevity of revision surgery.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational registry-based study of the National Joint Registry. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine the cumulative probability of revision and subsequent re-revision(s) following primary knee replacement. Analyses were stratified by age and gender and the influence of time from first to second revision on the risk of further revision was explored.

FINDINGS

There were 33,292 revision knee replacements with a linked primary episode. Revision rates of revision knee replacements were higher in males and younger patients. 19·9% of revisions were revised again within 13 years, 20·7% of second revisions were revised again within 5 years and 20·7% of third revisions were revised again within 3 years. A shorter time between revision episodes was associated with earlier subsequent revision.

INTERPRETATION

Males and younger patients are at higher risk of multiple revisions. Patients who undergo a revision have steadily increasing risk of further revision the more procedures they undergo, and each subsequent revision lasts for approximately half the time of the previous one.

FUNDING

This study was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston National Health Service Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. This study was also supported by funding from Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership and the National Joint Registry. Posts of authors of this work are part funded by a grant from the National Joint Registry to conduct statistical analysis for the National Joint Registry. AS was funded by a Medical Research Council Strategic Skills Fellowship MR/L01226X/1.

Factors predicting repeat revision and outcome after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: results from the New Zealand Joint Registry

PURPOSE

The number of Revision TKAs performed continues to increase; however there is limited data on risk factors for failure. Additionally, clinical decisions regarding when and how to revise a failed TKA may be as important as the technical aspects of the procedure. The purpose of this study was to analyze factors predicting repeat revision following aseptic revision TKA.

METHODS

Of 85,769 primary TKAs recorded on the New Zealand National Joint Registry, 1720 patients undergoing subsequent revision for aseptic indications between January 1999 and December 2015 were identified. Re-revision was recorded in 208 patients (12.1%). The analysis included demographic characteristics, surgeon revision case volume, surgical time, surgical ownership of index TKA as independent variables using logistic and linear regression. The primary outcome measure was incidence of subsequent re-revision and Oxford Knee Scores of revised TKAs (OKS). The secondary outcome measure was the influence of component exchange in major revisions on re-revision rate.

RESULTS

Younger patients undergoing a revision (HR 0.974) and male gender (HR 0.666) were predictors of re-revision. Elapsed time since index surgery (unstandardized coefficient 0.060) and lower ASA score (UC - 2.749) were significant predictors of OKS. Femoral component revision was a predictor of re-revision (HR 1.696) and had the lowest OKS, compared to tibial and all component revision (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat revision TKA is a rare and complex procedure influenced by a number of confounding factors. Using raw registry data, younger and male patients were found to be at a higher risk of re-revision after aseptic revision TKA. A longer time between primary TKA and revision was associated with better clinical outcomes. Isolated femoral component exchange led to worse outcomes both in terms of survivorship and functional scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Medium term clinical outcomes of tibial cones in revision knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Trabecular metal cones are a relatively new option for reconstruction of major bone defects during revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively assess medium-term results for tibial cones in revision TKA with a severe proximal tibial bone defect. We hypothesized that revision TKA patients with bone defects treated with trabecular metal cones have excellent medium-term clinical and radiological results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective review included all consecutive cases of tibial revision using trabecular metal cones. All patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included in the study. There were no exclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was tibial cone survivorship. The secondary endpoints were revision TKA all-cause survivorship, patient-reported outcome measures with a Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), SF 12, and radiographic analysis.

RESULTS

Five of the 57 patients alive at last follow-up (8.77%) had undergone revision (4 for infection and 1 for instability). Complications comprised four cases (7.02%) of infection, 2 cases (3.51%) of tibial and femoral implant aseptic loosening that did not require revision surgery, 1 of which (1.75%) with associated patellar loosening, and 1 case (1.75%) of instability. Kaplan-Meier estimates showed 100% 5-year survivorship with tibial cone revision for aseptic loosening and 93.44% (95% CI 83.47-97.49%) for all-cause revision.

DISCUSSION

The present study of cones used for tibial revision supports shows excellent results; however, longer and larger follow-up is needed to better assess results in revision TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4, retrospective study.

Revision total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study

Introduction

The primary aim of this study was to describe a baseline comparison of early knee-specific functional outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using metaphyseal sleeves with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary TKA. The secondary aim was to compare incidence of complications and length of stay (LOS) between the two groups.

Methods

Patients undergoing revision TKA for all diagnoses between 2009 and 2016 had patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected prospectively. PROMs consisted of the American Knee Society Score (AKSS) and Short-Form 12 (SF-12). The study cohort was identified retrospectively and demographics were collected. The cohort was matched to a control group of patients undergoing primary TKA.

Results

Overall, 72 patients underwent revision TKA and were matched with 72 primary TKAs with a mean follow-up of 57 months (standard deviation (SD) 20 months). The only significant difference in postoperative PROMs was a worse AKSS pain score in the revision group (36 vs 44, p = 0.002); however, these patients still produced an improvement in the pain score. There was no significant difference in improvement of AKSS or SF-12 between the two groups. LOS (9.3 days vs 4.6 days) and operation time (1 hour 56 minutes vs 1 hour 7 minutes) were significantly higher in the revision group (p < 0.001). Patients undergoing revision were significantly more likely to require intraoperative lateral release and postoperative urinary catheterisation (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This matched-cohort study provides results of revision TKA using modern techniques and implants and outlines what results patients can expect to achieve using primary TKA as a control. This should be useful to clinicians counselling patients for revision TKA.

What Is the Reliability of a New Classification for Bone Defects in Revision TKA Based on Preoperative Radiographs?

BACKGROUND

Accurate quantification of bone loss facilitates preoperative planning and standardization for research purposes in patients who undergo revision TKA. The most commonly used classification to rate bone defects in this setting, the Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute classification, does not quantify diaphyseal bone loss and reliability has not been well studied.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We developed a new classification scheme to rate bone defects in patients undergoing revision TKA and tested (1) the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of this classification for revision TKA based on preoperative radiographs, and (2) whether additional CT images might improve interobserver reliability.

METHODS

This was a preregistered observational study. Interobserver reliability was analyzed using preoperative radiographs of 61 patients who underwent (repeat) revision TKA, and their bone defects were rated by five experienced orthopaedic surgeons. For intraobserver reliability, ratings were repeated at least 2 weeks after the first rating (Timepoints 1 and 2). Directly after the radiographic assessments of Timepoint 2, the observers were provided with CT images of each patient and asked to rate the bone defects for a third time (Timepoint 3), to assess the additional value of CT. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability were tested using Gwet's agreement coefficient 2, which is a measure of agreement between observers in categorical data. Substantial agreement was defined as coefficients between 0.61 to 0.8 and almost perfect agreement as > 0.8.

RESULTS

The intraobserver reliability varied between 0.55 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.71) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.96) in the epiphysis, between 0.69 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.80) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.95 to 1) in the metaphysis, and between 0.95 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.99) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 1) in the diaphysis. The interobserver reliability varied between 0.48 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.57) and 0.49 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.56) in the epiphysis and between 0.81 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.87) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.93) in the metaphysis, and was 0.96 (95% CI 0.93 to 0.99) in the diaphysis at Timepoint 1. The interobserver reliability at Timepoint 2 was similar to that of Timepoint 1. The addition of CT images did not improve reliability (Timepoint 3).

CONCLUSIONS

The bone defect classification was less reliable in the epiphyseal area compared with the metaphysis and diaphysis. This finding may be explained by prosthetic components obscuring this region or the more severe bone defects in this region. The addition of CT scans did not improve reliability. Further testing of reliability with observers from other institutions is necessary, as well as validity testing, by testing the classification in relation to intraoperative findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

The Feasibility of Outpatient Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Selected Case Scenarios

BACKGROUND

As total knee arthroplasty (TKA) continues moving to the outpatient arena, the demand for revision surgery will subsequently increase which draws into question the feasibility for some revision scenarios as an outpatient. The purpose of this study is to report on the safety of outpatient revision knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

From June 2013 through December 2018, 102 patients (106 knees) underwent revision knee arthroplasty at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center. Mean patient age was 58.0 years, and 43% of patients were male. Procedures included the following: 45 cases of unicompartmental arthroplasty to TKA, 54 TKA revisions, and 52 cases involved a full exchange of components.

RESULTS

Ninety-three patients (88%) were discharged the same day without incident, none required transfer to acute facility, and 13 required overnight stay with 4 of these for convenience and 9 for medical reasons. There were no major complications within the first 48 hours postoperative. One patient required readmission for treatment of ileus 11 days postoperative. There were no other readmissions, no subsequent surgeries, and no deaths within 90 days. One or more major comorbidities were present in 66 patients.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient revision knee arthroplasty was found to be safe in carefully selected patients and case scenarios. Presence of medical comorbidities was not associated with risk of complications. The paradigm changes of patient education, medical optimization, and a multimodal program to mitigate the risk of blood loss and reduce need for narcotics facilitates performing some revision arthroplasties safely in an outpatient setting.

Influence of extension stem length and diameter on clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Extension stems provide stability to revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). Little is known regarding the relationship between stem characteristics and RTKA stability. We aimed to identify the relationship between canal filling ratio (CFR) and aseptic loosening following RTKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed demographics, radiographic parameters, and outcomes associated with RTKA performed between 2008 and 2013 in a tertiary hospital. The inclusion criteria were: revision for aseptic loosening, hybrid fixation, minor bone defect, Zimmer® LCCK prosthesis, and follow-up > 24 months. Using the modified Knee Society radiographic scoring system, radiographic prosthesis loosening was defined as a radiolucent line (RLL) score ≥ 9 on the femoral side or ≥ 10 on the tibial side. We utilized receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to evaluate the cutoff value for stem length and diameter in terms of prosthesis loosening or not. Furthermore, CFR-related parameters were analyzed with logistic regression to clarify their relationships with prosthesis loosening.

RESULTS

Prosthesis loosening was detected in 17 of 65 patients included. On logistic regression analysis, male sex and severity of the tibial bone defect were associated with loosening. On multivariate analysis, male sex and bone defect severity were associated with loosening on the femoral side, while malalignment was associated with loosening on the tibial side. Protective factors included femoral CFR > 0.85, CFR > 0.7 for > 2 cm, and CFR > 0.7 for > 4 cm, as well as tibial CFR > 0.85.

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize loosening post-RTKA, femoral CFR > 0.7 for > 2 cm and tibial CFR > 0.85 are recommended. Risk factors may include male sex, bone defect severity, and malalignment.

[Predictors for persistent pain and dissatisfaction after total knee arthroplasty]

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of patients patients suffer from persistent pain or are unsatisfied after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

OBJECTIVES

This work aims to present the frequency of postoperative persistent pain and/or dissatisfaction as well as known causes and predictors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The current literature is studied regarding the subject and is reviewed narratively.

RESULTS

Most postoperative problems did not arise from operation details, but from patient-related criteria, a lack of patient education and selection. The satisfaction correlates most strongly with the reduction of preoperative pain.

CONCLUSION

For a successful TKA, care should be taken that the following aspects are met preoperatively: clinically and radiologically advanced osteoarthritis, a patient age preferably older than 60 years, sufficient psychosocial resources to cope with postoperative stress, no opioid medication and realistic expectations after TKA. Postoperatively, patients with persistent pain or dissatisfaction should be checked for any prosthesis-related problems. If no prosthesis-related problems could be detected, the patients should be referred for interdisciplinary therapies.

Comparison of custom cutting guides based on three-dimensional computerized CT-scan planning and a conventional ancillary system based on two-dimensional planning in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Incorrect positioning of components during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) increases the risk of pain, instability, and early revision. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D planning-assisted and a conventional system for TKA positioning. We hypothesized that the use of three-dimensional CT-scan planning and custom cutting guides would increase the accuracy of component positioning.

METHODS

A randomized, controlled, prospective study of two groups was performed. In one group, patient-specific custom cutting guides (PSCG) were used for component positioning based on 3D CT-scan planning. In the control group, TKA was performed with a conventional ancillary system. The components' positioning angles were measured on 3D reconstructions. The main evaluation criterion was the percentage of outliers outside of a target zone of ± 3° for the coronal positioning of the femoral component.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included. The percentage of outliers for the femoral component was significantly lower in the 3D-guided group (1 patient) compared to the control group (7 patients p = 0.02). The coronal femoral angle was restored with greater accuracy in the 3D-assisted group (- 0.1° ± 1.4°) compared to the control group (1.6° ± 2.5°). Surgery was significantly shorter in the 3D group. The clinical outcomes were better in the 3D group at the two year follow-up with fewer failures and a lower standard deviation in IKS scores.

CONCLUSION

The use of a 3D planning and custom guides can improve TKA component positioning by increasing the accuracy of implants alignment and reducing the percentage of outliers. The same benefit was not demonstrated for the global knee alignment and the clinical scores with no indisputable clinical advantage for the PSCG.

Why are revision knee replacements failing?

AIM

The number of knee revisions worldwide has been steadily increasing. While being complex and expensive operations, a high percentage of knee revisions fail early. This study was conducted to evaluate the causes of failure of revision knee replacements.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively evaluated 95 patients following knee revision surgery and who underwent further knee revision operations. Indications for index revision as well as the reason for re-revision were recorded. Follow-up was from 30 to 97 months (mean 62 months).

RESULTS

The main cause of failure of revision knee replacements was infection (31 of 95, 32.6%) followed by aseptic loosening (30.5%). Indications for re-revision were instability in 12.6%, persistent stiffness in 10.5%, ongoing pain in 7.3%, extensor mechanism problems in 5.2%, and suspected metal allergy in one.

CONCLUSION

Infection and loosening continue to be the main reasons for failure of knee revisions. Improving outcomes for infection management and improved fixation methods may help reduce failed knee revisions.

Age, gender, functional KSS, reason for revision and type of bone defect predict functional outcome 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty: a multivariable prediction model

PURPOSE

The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (rTKA) is increasing. Unfortunately, not all patients benefit from revision surgery. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical prediction model that can be used to predict the functional outcome 5 years after rTKA.

METHODS

Data of patients receiving rTKA at Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, from 2004 onwards were prospectively collected. Demographic and clinical variables and patient-reported outcome scores were collected and considered as potential predictors. Beneficial outcome was defined as an increase of ≥ 20 points on the functional knee society scores (fKSS) or an absolute fKSS ≥ 80 points 5 years after surgery. The prediction model was developed using backward logistic regression. Regression coefficients were converted into an easy to use prediction rule.

RESULTS

Overall, 295 rTKA patients were included of whom 157 (53%) had beneficial fKSS 5 years later. Age, gender, femoral bone defects, preoperative fKSS, and stiffness as reason for revision were included in the model. Men had a higher chance of beneficial fKSS than women (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.91-2.78). Patients with major bone defects (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.85), higher age (IQR OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26-0.58), higher preoperative fKSS (IQR OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.59), and severe stiffness (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.20-1.15) had a lower chance of successful outcome. The model's AUC was 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.81.

CONCLUSION

Easily determinable characteristics of patients who need rTKA can be used to predict future functional outcome. Young men with low preoperative fKSS without severe stiffness are more likely to achieve a beneficial outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Higher mid-term revision rates of posterior stabilized compared with cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasties: 133,841 cemented arthroplasties for osteoarthritis in the Netherlands in 2007-2016

Background and purpose - The preference for a cruciate retaining (CR) or posterior stabilized (PS) TKA (total knee arthroplasty) system varies greatly between Dutch hospitals, independent of patient characteristics. We examined mid-term revision rates for men and women of different age categories. Patients and methods - We included all 133,841 cemented fixed-bearing primary CR or PS TKAs for osteoarthritis reported in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) in 2007-2016. Revision procedures were defined as minor when only insert and/or patella were revised and as major when fixed components (tibia and femur) were revised or removed. 8-year all-cause revision rates of CR and PS TKAs were calculated using competing-risk analyses. Cox-regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age at surgery, sex, ASA -score, and previous operations. Results - PS TKAs were 1.5 (95% CI 1.4-1.6) times more likely to be revised within 8 years of the primary procedure, compared with CR TKAs. When stratified for sex and age category, 8-year revision rate of PS TKAs in men <60 years was 13% (CI 11-15), compared to 7.2% (CI 6.1-8.5) of CR TKAs. Less prominent differences were found in older men and women. For men <60 years differences were found for minor (CR 1.8% (CI 1.4-2.5); PS 3.7% (CI 3.0-4.7)) and major revisions (CR 4.2% (CI 3.3-5.3); PS 7.0% (CI 5.6-8.7)). Interpretation - Patients who received a cemented fixed-bearing primary PS TKA for osteoarthritis are more likely to undergo either a minor or a major revision within 8 years. This is especially prominent for younger men.

Porous metal cones: gold standard for massive bone loss in complex revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of current literature

INTRODUCTION

Revision knee arthroplasty is increasing, and in that case, bone loss management is still a challenging problem. In the last years, the body of literature and interest surrounding porous metal cones has grown, but few systematic evaluations of the existing evidence have been performed. The aim of our systematic review is to collect and critically analyze the available evidence about metal cones in revision knee arthroplasty especially focusing our attention on indications, results, complications, and infection rate of these promising orthopaedic devices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the available English literature, considering the outcomes and the complications of tantalum cones. The combinations of keyword were "porous metal cones", "knee revision", "bone loss", "knee arthroplasty", "periprosthetic joint infection", and "outcome".

RESULTS

From the starting 312 papers available, 20 manuscripts were finally included. Only one included study has a control group. The main indication for metal cones is type IIb and III defects according AORI classification. Most of the papers show good clinical and radiological outcomes with low rate of complications.

CONCLUSION

The examined studies provide encouraging clinical and radiological short-to-mid-term outcomes. Clinical studies have shown a low rate of aseptic loosening, intraoperative fractures, infection rate and a lower failure rate than the previous treatment methods. Higher quality papers are needed to draw definitive conclusions about porous metal cones.

Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) in total knee arthroplasty, is it worth it? A review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is a well-established extensile approach to improve joint visualization and implant removal. Despite this, TTO is a challenging technique with a long learning curve and potential pitfalls. Complications are not infrequent, even if performing the correct surgical steps. Aim of this paper is to review the current literature about TTO, its safeness and reliability, and finally the complications rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the available English literature, considering the outcomes and the complications of TTO. The combinations of keyword were "tibial tubercle osteotomy", "total knee arthroplasty", "total knee revision", "outcomes", "complication" and "surgical approach".

RESULTS

From the starting 322 papers available, 26 manuscripts were finally included. Most of the papers show significant improvements in clinical outcomes, both in primary and in revision procedures. Radiographic fragment healing is close to 100%. Related complications can range from 3.8-20%.

CONCLUSION

TTO may be necessary to correct pathological tuberosity position or patella tracking. However, TTO is a challenging technique to improve the surgical approach during total knee arthroplasty. A strict surgical technique can lead to better results and to minimize complications. However, it is not clear if the improved outcome can outweigh the longer surgery and the higher risk of pitfalls.

The role of isolated polyethylene exchange in total knee arthroplasty

The use of modular total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants allows surgeons to perform isolated tibial polyethylene insert exchange (IPE) while retaining well-fixed and stable components.The purported advantages of IPE include preservation of bone stock, shorter operating time, less blood loss, faster rehabilitation and lower cost. However, the indications for IPE are limited.IPE for wear and osteolysis has moderate success in the medium term but should be avoided in cases of accelerated wear. In selected cases, debridement and IPE for early infection can result in low morbidity with high success rates in the short term. IPE for arthrofibrosis has poor results.IPE should be undertaken with caution and an institutional algorithm should be followed. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:66-71 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160049.

Malnutrition - An underestimated factor in the inpatient treatment of traumatology and orthopedic patients: A prospective evaluation of 1055 patients

INTRODUCTION

Suboptimal nutritional status is often observed among hospitalized patients across all medical specialties. The objective of the present study was to (1) analyze the prevalence of malnutrition in hospitalized orthopedic and trauma patients and (2) to evaluate the relationship between malnutrition and selected clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The prospective field study was conducted between 06/2014 and 06/2015 in a German level I trauma center (Department of Traumatology, Septic Trauma Surgery and Arthroplasty) with a total number of 1055 patients. At hospital admission, patients were checked for malnutrition using the validated Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS). Patients at risk for malnutrition were defined as NRS≥3. Quality of life (SF-36) was assessed to evaluate the physical and mental health status prior to hospitalization. Clinical outcomes under consideration included 1) rate of adverse events, 2) length of hospitalization, and 3) mobilization after operative and conservative treatment. Patients were included independently of surgical intervention or age.

RESULTS

22.3% (235) of our patients were at risk for malnutrition (NRS≥3) while a regular nutritional status (NRS<3) was diagnosed in 77.7% (819). The highest prevalence of malnutrition was found in Septic Surgery with 31.0% (106), followed by Traumatology with 19.2% (100) and Arthroplasty with 15.1% (29). Higher prevalence of malnutrition was observed among patients with typical fractures of the elderly, such as lumbar spine and pelvis (47.4%), proximal femur (36.4%) and proximal humeral (26.7%) fractures. Furthermore, patients at risk for malnutrition showed prolonged hospitalization (13.7±11.1 vs. 18.2±11.7days), delayed postoperative mobilization (2.2±2.9 vs. 4.0±4.9days) and delayed mobilization after conservative treatment (1.1±2.7 vs. 1.8±1.9days). A statistically significant correlation of NRS with each parameter (Spearman's rank correlation, p<0.05) was observed. The incidence of adverse events in patients at risk for malnutrition was statistically significantly higher compared to that of patients with a regular nutritional status (37.2% vs. 21.1%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition is widespread regarding hospitalized patients in the field of orthopedic and trauma surgery and results in suboptimal clinical outcome. It should be considered as an important factor that significantly contributes to delayed recovery. Especially elderly trauma patients and patients suffering from postoperative infections should be monitored carefully during hospitalization.

Radiographic Evaluations of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Plea for Uniform Assessments

Thorough radiographic evaluation is necessary for perioperative assessments in revision total knee arthroplasty. There has been a large degree of variability in reporting these findings within the peer-reviewed literature. Our purpose was to evaluate studies that radiographically assessed alignment in the coronal and sagittal plane, patella alignment and thickness, presence and characterization of implant interface, and radiolucency. Secondly, we reviewed studies using a standardized reporting system to evaluate radiographic findings (the Knee Society Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System) and the number of times it was referenced. Only 62% of studies evaluated all radiographic parameters, 57% to 91% assessed each metric, and 55% used standardized reporting systems. This emphasizes the need for a uniform evaluation method to ensure consistent radiographic assessment and optimal standard of care.

Stemmed femoral implants show lower failure rates in revision total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Stemmed femoral implants are not universally used in revision total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the re-revision rate would be greater for revision total knees performed without stemmed femoral implants compared with revision total knees performed with stemmed femoral implants.

METHODS

All revision cases performed at a single institution between 2004 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 130 revision total knee arthroplasty procedures (63 Group 1; 67 Group 2) met the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Revisions performed without femoral stems failed more often than revisions with femoral stems (44% vs 9%, p<0.001) despite more severe pre-operative bone loss in groups that were revised with stems (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend that femoral stems be used routinely in procedures where a femoral implant is revised following a prior total knee arthroplasty.

Dealing with the predicted increase in demand for revision total knee arthroplasty: challenges, risks and opportunities

Worldwide rates of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are rising due to increased longevity of the population and the burden of osteoarthritis. Revision TKA is a technically demanding procedure generating outcomes which are reported to be inferior to those of primary knee arthroplasty, and with a higher risk of complication. Overall, the rate of revision after primary arthroplasty is low, but the number of patients currently living with a TKA suggests a large potential revision healthcare burden. Many patients are now outliving their prosthesis, and consideration must be given to how we are to provide the necessary capacity to meet the rising demand for revision surgery and how to maximise patient outcomes. The purpose of this review was to examine the epidemiology of, and risk factors for, revision knee arthroplasty, and to discuss factors that may enhance patient outcomes.

Computed tomography scanogram compared to long leg radiograph for determining axial knee alignment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Supine computed tomography scanogram (CTS) is a commonly used alternative to weight bearing long leg plain radiograph (LLR) in measuring knee alignment. No published studies have validated its use in the native knee and the post-unicompartmental replacement knee (UKR). We quantified the difference in measurements obtained from CTS and LLR for knee alignment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Supine CT scanograms and weight bearing long leg plain anteroposterior radiographs were obtained for 40 knees (in 25 patients), 17 of which were native, and 23 of which were post-UKR. The mechanical and anatomical axes of the tibio-femoral joint were measured. Bland-Altman plots were used to calculate the 1.96 standard deviation limits of agreement between CTS and LLR. Intraclass correlation was used to assess intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (where values > 0.81 indicate very good reliability).

RESULTS

CTS and LLR were equally reliable in measurement of the mechanical and anatomical axes of the tibio-femoral joint (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) > 0.9 for all parameters). Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences were found between CTS and LLR in measurement of the mechanical axis (limits of agreement: UKR -3.2° to 6.3°; native -3.2° to 5.6°) and the anatomical axis (limits of agreement: UKR -3.7° to 8.7°; native -2.0° to 8.8°).

INTERPRETATION

Although it is a reliable tool, CTS is not necessarily an accurate one for measurement of knee alignment when compared to LLR. We recommend that CTS should not be used as a substitute for LLR in measurement of the mechanical or anatomical axes of the knee.

Re-admissions, re-operations and length of stay in hospital after aseptic revision knee replacement in Denmark: a two-year nationwide study

We present detailed information about early morbidity after aseptic revision knee replacement from a nationwide study. All aseptic revision knee replacements undertaken between 1st October 2009 and 30th September 2011 were analysed using the Danish National Patient Registry with additional information from the Danish Knee Arthroplasty Registry. The 1218 revisions involving 1165 patients were subdivided into total revisions, large partial revisions, partial revisions and revisions of unicondylar replacements (UKR revisions). The mean age was 65.0 years (27 to 94) and the median length of hospital stay was four days (interquartile range: 3 to 5), with a 90 days re-admission rate of 9.9%, re-operation rate of 3.5% and mortality rate of 0.2%. The age ranges of 51 to 55 years (p = 0.018), 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001) and ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) were related to an increased risk of re-admission. The age ranges of 76 to 80 years (p = 0.018) and the large partial revision subgroup (p = 0.073) were related to an increased risk of re-operation. The ages from 76 to 80 years (p < 0.001), age ≥ 81 years (p < 0.001) and surgical time > 120 min (p < 0.001) were related to increased length of hospital stay, whereas the use of a tourniquet (p = 0.008) and surgery in a low volume centre (p = 0.013) were related to shorter length of stay. In conclusion, we found a similar incidence of early post-operative morbidity after aseptic knee revisions as has been reported after primary procedures. This suggests that a length of hospital stay ≤ four days and discharge home at that time is safe following aseptic knee revision surgery in Denmark.

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation

Background:

Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation is an effective treatment for osteochondral defects. Some patients require further surgical intervention, such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The effects of prior OCA transplantation on TKA outcomes are unknown.

Purpose:

This study evaluated TKA failure rates after long-term follow-up and identified factors that may have contributed to an inferior outcome. Its aims were to (1) assess if having a prior OCA transplantation would increase the surgical complications of the subsequent TKA, (2) measure the infection and failure rates following TKA, (3) ascertain subjective outcomes scores from patients with intact TKA at latest follow-up, and (4) identify potential factors that contributed to inferior outcomes.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A total of 35 patients who underwent TKA after OCA were identified. Pain, symptoms, function, and quality of life were evaluated using the Knee Society Function score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Associations between outcomes scores versus total number of surgeries before TKA were assessed using Spearman correlation. Patient characteristics (age, sex, total OCA area, presentation of osteoarthritis, and number of surgeries before TKA) were calculated between failures and nonfailures.

Results:

For patients with TKA surviving at latest follow-up (n = 24), mean follow-up time was 9.2 ± 4.3 years after TKA and 16.1 ± 5.2 years after OCA. While TKA after OCA did not present a technical challenge in the operating room, there was a high failure rate (31.4%). Activities of daily living, as measured on KOOS, were negatively correlated with total number of surgeries before TKA (ρ² = –0.5, P = .041). Patient age and number of surgeries before TKA influenced the failure rate, while sex and OCA area did not appear to be factors associated with inferior outcomes.

Conclusion:

Patients with multiple knee operations before TKA were more likely to experience functional limitations or TKA failure. The patients who experienced TKA failure were part of a challenging subset of young patients treated with numerous orthopaedic procedures, and while these patients had inferior results with TKA after OCA, the OCA transplantation extended the time before a TKA was required without adding surgical complications.

Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Controversy exists about the real effectiveness of modular augmentation to manage bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of modular augmentation to reconstruct severe defects (1) significantly increased overall outcomes, (2) caused radiolucency or osteolysis and (3) affected mid-term survivorship of knee revisions. The hypothesis was that modular augmentation provides a good survivorship of knee revisions.

METHODS

Thirty-eight consecutive revision knee arthroplasties were followed for a median follow-up period of 7 (4.5-9) years. Type 2 and 3 defects were treated with metal augments, tantalum cones and modular cementless stems. Patients were assessed using the IKS knee and function scores and the HSS score.

RESULTS

The median IKS knee and function scores and HSS score were 34 (15-58), 19.5 (13-39) and 30 (24-60) points before the operation, respectively, and 78 (49-97), 76 (58-90) and 80.5 (64-98) points (p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up. The median knee flexion increased from 82° (31°-110°) to 116° (100°-129°) (p < 0.01). Tibial radiolucencies were observed in 2 (5.2 %) cases. Re-revision was necessary in three (7.9 %) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Modular augmentation may reduce the need for allografting to treat severe bone defects, providing a well-functioning and durable knee joint reconstruction.

One dose of tranexamic acid is safe and effective in revision knee arthroplasty

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been associated with an increased risk of perioperative blood loss. Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to be safe and effective in preventing blood loss in primary TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of TXA on blood loss and transfusion rates in revision TKA. We performed a retrospective comparative study on 424 patients who had undergone revision TKA between January 2006 and March 2010. A total of 178 patients did not receive TXA while 246 patients received one intraoperative dose of 20mg/kg of TXA given prior to tourniquet release. There was a significant reduction in hemoglobin loss (42±16g/L vs 38±15g/L, P=0.005), transfusion rates (30.3% vs 16.7%, P=0.001) and average amount transfused (1.1±1.9units vs 0.5±1.1units, P=0.001) in the TXA group. There was no significant difference in recorded major adverse events with the administration of TXA.

Revision of infected total knee arthroplasty: two-stage reimplantation using an antibiotic-impregnated static spacer

BACKGROUND

A two-stage revision remains as the "gold standard" treatment for chronically infected total knee arthroplasties.

METHODS

Forty-five septic knee prostheses were revised with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Static antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers were used in all cases. Intravenous antibiotics according to sensitivity test of the culture were applied during patients' hospital stay. Oral antibiotics were given for another 5 weeks. Second-stage surgery was undertaken after control of infection with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein values. Extensile techniques were used if needed and metallic augments were employed for bone loss in 32 femoral and 29 tibial revisions.

RESULTS

The average interval between the first-stage resection and reimplantation was 4.4 months. Significant improvement was obtained with respect to visual analog scale pain and clinical and functional scores, and infection was eradicated in 95.6% of cases following a two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty. Radiographic evaluation showed suitable alignment without signs of mechanical loosening.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique is a reasonable procedure to eradicate chronic infection in knee arthroplasty and provides proper functional and clinical results. However, it sometimes requires extensile surgical approaches that could imply arduous surgeries. Metallic augments with cementless stems available in most of the knee revision systems are a suitable alternative to handle bone deficiencies, avoiding the use of bone allografts with its complications.

Constraint choice in revision knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Along with the increase in primary total knee arthroplasty, there has been an increase in the number of revisions. The aim of this study was to propose a selection algorithm for the knee revision constraint according to the state of ligaments and to the bone defects Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute Classification [AORI] classification. The hypothesis was that this algorithm would facilitate the appropriate choice of prosthesis constraint, thus providing stable components and a good long-term survivorship of the knee revisions.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive revision knee arthroplasties in 57 patients were prospectively evaluated. Prostheses implanted at revision included postero-stabilised, condylar constrained and rotating hinged, relative to the state of the ligaments and of the bone loss around the knee. The median follow-up was nine years (range, 4-12).

RESULTS

The median IKS knee and function scores and HSS score were 41 (15-62), 21.5 (12-43) and 34 (23-65) points, respectively, before the operation, and 81 (48-97), 79 (56-92) and 83.5 (62-98) points (p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up evaluation. The median ROM increased from 74° (29-110°) preoperatively to 121° (98-132°) (p < 0.01) at the final follow-up. Re-revision was necessary in five (8.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A selection algorithm for the revision implant constraint based on the state of ligaments and the bone loss AORI classification could provide stable knee reconstructions and long-term success of knee revisions.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Causes and Outcomes

Introduction: Local data on revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are limited. This study aims to assess the causes and outcomes of revision TKA in a single institution, with a 2-year follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of case records of patients who underwent revision TKA in 2008 and 2009 in the authors’ institution was performed. Outcome was assessed using SF-36, Oxford knee score and Knee Society Clinical Rating System preoperatively, at 6 months and at 2 years’ follow-up. Results: Forty-one patients (41 knees) were included in the study. Indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 13 (31.7%), mechanical wear/component failure in 10 (24.4%), infection in 9 (22.0%), malalignment in 4 (9.8%), instability in 3 (7.3%), periprosthetic fracture in 1 (2.4%) and persistent stiffness in 1 (2.4%). Significant improvements were seen postoperatively in all 3 instruments used to evaluate clinical outcome. These improvements were seen at 6 months after surgery, and were maintained through the 2-year follow-up period. There were no significant changes in all scores between 6 months and 2 years follow-up. There was 100% survivorship of the implants with no postoperative complications requiring surgical intervention. Conclusion: Indications for revision TKA locally are similar to those in other large centres. Revision total knee arthroplasty results in significantly improved function and quality of life for patients, which is maintained over a 2-year follow-up period. In our series, we obtained 100% implant survivorship. Key words: Failure, Infection, Instability, Loosening, Malalignment

The aetiology of total knee arthroplasty failure influences the improvement in knee function

BACKGROUND

Some indications for revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA), e.g. arthrofibrosis, have been identified to yield inferior results. The aim of this study was to analyse the results of revision TKA according to aetiology of TKA failure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The results of 97 consecutive revision TKA in 97 patients stratified according to the aetiology of primary TKA failure (periprosthetic infection, aseptic loosening, instability and arthrofibrosis), were compared using the Knee Society Score (KSS). The effect of patient age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, interval to revision and the occurrence of complications on the outcome were also analysed.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 29 months, the KSS had significantly improved in all patient groups (p < 0.001). The analysis of variance among patient groups depicted no significant differences between preoperative KSS (p = 0.618) and postoperative KSS (p = 0.915), while the magnitude of pre- to postoperative improvement showed significant differences between the groups (p = 0.006). The aetiology of primary TKA failure had an independent influence on pre- to postoperative improvement (p = 0.014). Of the other factors analysed, only the ASA classification had an independent impact on postoperative KSS (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

The aetiology of TKA failure has an effect on the improvement in knee function from revision TKA. As no difference was observed between patient groups postoperatively, similar clinical results can be expected independent of the aetiology of primary TKA failure.