The role of static and dynamic rotatory laxity testing in evaluating ACL injury

DYNEELAX Robotic Arthrometer Reliability and Feasibility on Healthy and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injured/Reconstructed Persons

Background

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are commonly assessed using clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging, but these methods have limitations in reproducibility and quantification. Instrumented laxity measurements using devices, like the DYNEELAX®, offer an alternative approach. However, to date, there is no human data on the DYNEELAX® and the reliability of these devices remains a subject of debate, and there is no consensus on appropriate knee tightening levels for testing. We hypothesized that the DYNEELAX®, with standardized knee tightening, would provide reliable measurements of knee laxity in adult volunteers.

Methods

This prospective cohort study involved 48 pain-free adult volunteers. Laxity measurements were taken using a robotic-type motorized instrument (DYNEELAX®) on two separate occasions, at least 1 h and no more than 8 h apart, with knee tightening forces of 90 N ± 5 N. Metrics of anterior tibial translation and internal/external tibial axial rotations were recorded.

Results

The device displayed excellent intrarater reliability for all the metrics, with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.91 to 0.96. Anterior translation exhibited the highest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96), with a minimum detectable change of 0.83 mm.

Conclusions

DYNEELAX® is reliable in measuring knee laxity in adult volunteers when using standardized stabilizing knee tightening forces of 90 ± 5 N. The most sensitive measurement parameters (in terms of minimum detectable change as a proportion of the observed range) were anterior translation (in mm) at 150 N and secondary compliance.

Pivot Shift Syndrome of the Knee

The pivot shift test, in contrast to the Lachman or anterior drawer, is a manually subjective clinical test that simulates the injury mechanism. It is the most sensitive test to determine ACL insufficiency. This paper reviews the history, development, research, and treatment associated with the pivot shift phenomenon which is associated with tearing and loss of function of the knee anterior cruciate ligament. The pivot shift test most closely recapitulates what the symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament deficient patient feels is happening which is an abnormal translation and rotation of the injured joint during flexion or extension. The test is best conducted in the relaxed patient by applying knee flexion, tibial external rotation, and valgus stress. The pivot shift biomechanics and treatment measures are reviewed.

ACL deficiency influences medio-lateral tibial alignment and knee varus-valgus during in vivo activities

PURPOSE

The role of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) in knee biomechanics in vivo and under weight-bearing is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the tibiofemoral kinematics of ACL-deficient knees to healthy contralateral ones during the execution of weight-bearing activities.

METHODS

Eight patients with isolated ACL injury and healthy contralateral knees were included in the study. Patients were asked to perform a single step forward and a single leg squat first with the injured knee and then with the contralateral one. Knee motion was determined using a validated model-based tracking process that matched subject-specific MRI bone models to dynamic biplane radiographic images, under the principles of Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Data processing was performed in a specific software developed in Matlab.

RESULTS

Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for single leg squat along the frontal plane: ACL-deficient knees showed a more varus angle, especially at the highest knee flexion angles (40°-50° on average), compared to the contralateral knees. Furthermore, ACL-deficient knees showed tibial medialization along the entire task, while contralateral knees were always laterally aligned. This difference became statistically relevant (p < 0.05) for knee flexion angles included between 0° and about 30°.

CONCLUSION

ACL-deficient knees showed an abnormal tibial medialization and increased varus angle during single leg squat when compared to the contralateral knees. These biomechanical anomalies could cause a different force distribution on tibial plateau, explaining the higher risk of early osteoarthritis in ACL deficiency. The clinical relevance of this study is that also safe activities used in ACL rehabilitation protocols are significantly altered in ACL deficiency.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Medial and lateral meniscus have a different role in kinematics of the ACL-deficient knee: a systematic review

Importance

Meniscal tears are frequently associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and the correct management of this kind of lesion during ACL-reconstruction procedure is critical for the restoration of knee kinematics. Although the importance of meniscus in knee biomechanics is generally accepted, the influence of medial and lateral meniscus in stability of ACL-deficient knee is still unclear.

Objective

The aim of this study was to review literature, which analysed effects in cadaveric specimens of meniscal tear and meniscectomy of medial and lateral meniscus on laxity in the ACL-deficient knee.

Evidence review

Authors performed a systematic search for cadaveric studies analysing the effect of medial and lateral meniscus tears or resection on kinematics of ACL-deficient knee. Extracted data included year of publications, number of human cadaver knee specimens, description of apparatus testing and instrumented kinematic evaluation, testing protocol and results.

Findings

Authors identified 18 studies that met inclusion and exclusion criteria of current review. The major finding of the review was that the works included reported a difference role of medial and lateral meniscus in restraining ACL-deficient knee laxity. Medial meniscus tear or resection resulted in a significant increase of anterior tibial displacement. Lateral meniscus lesions or meniscectomy on the other hand significantly increased rotation and translation under a coupled valgus stress and internal-rotation torque/pivot shift test.

Conclusions

Medial and lateral meniscus have a different role in stabilising the ACL-deficient knee: while the medial meniscus functions as a critical secondary stabilisers of anterior tibial translation under an anterior/posterior load, lateral meniscus appears to be a more important restraint of rotational and dynamic laxity.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level I–IV studies.

Clinical Results of Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis

In the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knee, excellent outcomes are achieved in many patients with an isolated, intra-articular ACL reconstruction. Some patients, however, have ongoing instability or suffer graft rupture. Failure after ACL reconstruction is multifactorial, but residual anterolateral rotatory laxity is 1 potential contributing factor. Lateral extra-articular procedures are a heterogenous group of operations that were initially described as isolated treatments for the ACL deficient knee, and subsequently used in combination with intra-articular reconstructions. Initial observational studies were encouraging, however, comparative studies were less flattering and lead to a general abandonment of these procedures. With improved understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the anterolateral capsuloligamentous complex there has been a renewed interest in these procedures. Recent systematic reviews suggest efficacy of these procedures in improving rotational control, though data showing improved patient reported outcomes or reduced graft rupture rates are lacking. Preliminary results from ongoing clinical trials are supportive for lateral extra-articular tenodesis when used as an augment to modern, intra-articular ACL reconstructions in targeted, high-risk patients.

Global rotation has high sensitivity in ACL lesions within stress MRI

PURPOSE

This study aims to objectively compare side-to-side differences of P-A laxity alone and coupled with rotatory laxity within magnetic resonance imaging, in patients with total anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled sixty-one patients with signs and symptoms of unilateral total anterior cruciate ligament rupture, which were referred to magnetic resonance evaluation with simultaneous instrumented laxity measurements. Sixteen of those patients were randomly selected to also have the contralateral healthy knee laxity profile tested. Images were acquired for the medial and lateral tibial plateaus without pressure, with postero-anterior translation, and postero-anterior translation coupled with maximum internal and external rotation, respectively.

RESULTS

All parameters measured were significantly different between healthy and injured knees (P < 0.05), with exception of lateral plateau without stress. The difference between injured and healthy knees for medial and lateral tibial plateaus anterior displacement (P < 0.05) and rotation (P < 0.001) was statistically significant. It was found a significant correlation between the global rotation of the lateral tibial plateau (lateral plateau with internal + external rotation) with pivot-shift, and between the anterior global translation of both tibial plateaus (medial + lateral tibial plateau) with Lachman. The anterior global translation of both tibial plateaus was the most specific test with a cut-off point of 11.1 mm (93.8 %), and the global rotation of the lateral tibial plateau was the most sensitive test with a correspondent cut-off point of 15.1 mm (92.9 %).

CONCLUSION

Objective laxity quantification of ACL-injured knees showed increased sagittal laxity, and simultaneously in sagittal and transversal planes, when compared to their healthy contralateral knee. Moreover, when measuring instability from anterior cruciate ligament ruptures, the anterior global translation of both tibial plateaus and global rotation of the lateral tibial plateau add diagnostic specificity and sensitivity. This work strengthens the evidence that the anterior cruciate ligament plays an important biomechanical role in controlling the anterior translation, but also both internal and external rotation. The high sensitivity and specificity of this device in objectively identifying and measuring the multiplanar instability clearly guides stability restoration clinical procedures. Level of evidence Cross-sectional study, Level III.

Validity of rotational laxity coupled with anterior translation of the knee: A cadaveric study comparing radiostereometry and the Rotab®

BACKGROUND

In current practice, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears can be diagnosed using several devices to measure anterior tibial translation and rotational knee laxity, but these measures are never collected together. The Rotab®, which yields simultaneous measurements of anterior tibial translation and passive lower limb rotation under stress, would therefore be advantageous in current practice, but its reliability has never been tested.

AIM OF STUDY

To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the Rotab® compared to the reference system, radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

METHODS

This anatomical study was conducted on 14 lower limbs collected from fresh cadavers. Simultaneous measurements of anterior tibial translation and rotation were obtained with both systems, with antero-posterior (AP) forces of 134N and 250N using the Rotab®. Measurements were made on intact ACL and then repeated after ACL section. Variables were analyzed in univariate analysis by ANOVA, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between the systems was determined by the Bland and Altman method.

RESULTS

The difference between the two methods for evaluating anterior tibial translation was 0.05±0.98mm at 134N and 0.29±1.04mm at 250N. The correlation between the tests was high (r₁₃₄=r₂₅₀=0.97, p=0.8). The difference between the two methods for rotational laxity was 0.69±2.7° at 134N and 0.5±0.6° at 250N. The Rotab® showed a significant difference only at 250N for rotational laxity after the ACL tear.

CONCLUSION

The Rotab® is a reliable device to measure rotational laxity coupled with anterior translation of the knee.

Functional knee assessment with advanced imaging

The purpose of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to restore the native stability of the knee joint and to prevent further injury to meniscus and cartilage, yet studies have suggested that joint laxity remains prevalent in varying degrees after ACL reconstruction. Imaging can provide measurements of translational and rotational motions of the tibiofemoral joint that may be too small to detect in routine physical examinations. Various imaging modalities, including fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have emerged as powerful methods in measuring the minute details involved in joint biomechanics. While each technique has its own strengths and limitations, they have all enhanced our understanding of the knee joint under various stresses and movements. Acquiring the knowledge of the complex and dynamic motions of the knee after surgery would help lead to improved surgical techniques and better patient outcomes.

Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity

Several devices allow to measure anterior and rotational static knee laxity. To date, the use of rotational laxity measurements in the daily clinical practice however remains to be improved. These measurements may be systematically integrated to the follow-up of knee injuries. Physiologic laxity measurements may particularly be of interest for the identification of risk factors in athletes. Furthermore, knee laxity measurements help to improve the diagnosis of knee soft tissue injuries and to follow up reconstructions. Further prospective follow-ups of knee laxity in the injured/reconstructed knees are however required to conclude on the best treatment strategy for knee soft tissue injuries.

Clinically relevant biomechanics of the knee capsule and ligaments

The paper describes the concepts of primary and secondary restraints to knee joint stability and explains systematically how the tibia is stabilised against translational forces and rotational torques in different directions and axes, and how those vary across the arc of flexion-extension. It also shows how the menisci act to stabilise the knee, in addition to load carrying across the joint. It compares the properties of the natural stabilising structures with the strength and stiffness of autogenous tissue grafts and relates those strengths to the strength of graft fixation devices. A good understanding of the biomechanical behaviour of these various structures in the knee will help the surgeon in the assessment and treatment of single and multi-ligament injuries.

A mechanical pivot-shift device for continuously applying defined loads to cadaveric knees

PURPOSE

Current techniques to study the biomechanics of the pivot-shift utilize either static or poorly defined loading conditions. Here, a novel mechanical pivot-shift device that continuously applies well-defined loads to cadaveric knees is characterized and validated against the manual pivot-shift.

METHODS

Six fresh-frozen human lower limb specimens were potted at the femur, mounted on a hinged testing base, and fitted with the mechanical device. Five mechanical and manual pivot-shift tests were performed on each knee by two examiners before and after transecting the ACL. Three-dimensional kinematics (anterior and internal-rotary displacements, and posterior and external-rotary velocities) and kinetics (forces and moments applied to the tibia by the device) were recorded using an optical navigation system and 6-axis load cell. Analysis of variance and Bland-Altman statistics were used to gauge repeatability within knees, reproducibility between knees, agreement between the mechanical and manual test methods, and agreement between examiners.

RESULTS

The forces and moments applied by the device were continuous and repeatable/reproducible to within 4/10 % of maximum recorded values. Kinematic variables (excluding external-rotary velocity) were qualitatively and quantitatively similar to manual pivot-shift kinematics, and were more repeatable and reproducible.

CONCLUSION

The presented device induces pivot-shift-like kinematics by applying highly repeatable three-dimensional loads to cadaver knees. It is based on a simple mechanical principle and designed using easily obtainable components. Consequently, the device enables orthopaedic biomechanists to easily and reliably quantify the effect of ACL injury and reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics.

Combined anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements improve the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries

PURPOSE

This study analysed whether associating the side-to-side difference in displacement and the slope of the load-displacement curve of anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements would improve the instrumental diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures and help to detect different types of ACL tears.

METHODS

Anterior and rotational knee laxity was measured in 128 patients with an arthroscopically confirmed ACL injury and 104 healthy controls. Side-to-side differences were determined for three variables in anterior laxity: anterior displacement at 200 N (ATD200), primary compliance from 30 to 50 N (PCA) and secondary compliance from 100 to 200 N (SCA). Furthermore, four variables in rotational laxity were considered: internal and external rotation at 5 N m (IR5/ER5) and compliance from 2 to 5 N m (C IR/C ER). Receiver operating characteristic curves allowed to determine thresholds, specificities and sensitivities to detect ACL lesions, based on single variables considered and combinations thereof.

RESULTS

Sensitivity and specificity reached, respectively, 75 and 95 % for ATD200 (threshold: 1.2 mm) and 38 and 95 % for IR5 (threshold: 3.2°). If either two out of the three variables were positive for anterior laxity or both IR5 and C IR were positive, 81 % of patients were identified without a false positive. All patients for whom ATD200 was >3.7 mm, PCA > 48 μm/N or SCA > 17.5 µm/N had ACL remnants that were either totally resorbed or healed on the posterior cruciate ligament.

CONCLUSION

Combined instrumented anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements have excellent diagnostic value for ACL injury, provided that several measurements be considered concomitantly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level III.

Noninjured Knees of Patients With Noncontact ACL Injuries Display Higher Average Anterior and Internal Rotational Knee Laxity Compared With Healthy Knees of a Noninjured Population

BACKGROUND

Excessive physiological anterior and rotational knee laxity is thought to be a risk factor for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and inferior reconstruction outcomes, but no thresholds have been established to identify patients with increased laxity.

PURPOSE

(1) To determine if the healthy contralateral knees of ACL-injured patients have greater anterior and rotational knee laxity, leading to different laxity profiles (combination of laxities), compared with healthy control knees and (2) to set a threshold to help discriminate anterior and rotational knee laxity between these groups.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 171 healthy contralateral knees of noncontact ACL-injured patients (ACL-H group) and 104 healthy knees of control participants (CTL group) were tested for anterior and rotational laxity. Laxity scores (measurements corrected for sex and body mass) were used to classify knees as hypolax (score <-1), normolax (between -1 and 1), or hyperlax (>1). Proportions of patients in each group were compared using χ(2) tests. Receiver operating characteristic curves were computed to discriminate laxity between the groups. Odds ratios were calculated to determine the probability of being in the ACL-H group.

RESULTS

The ACL-H group displayed greater laxity scores for anterior displacement and internal rotation in their uninjured knee compared with the CTL group (P < .05). Laxity profiles were different between the groups for the following associations: normolax in anterior displacement/hypolax in internal rotation (6% [ACL-H] vs 15% [CTL]; P = .02) and hyperlax in anterior displacement/normolax in internal rotation (27% [ACL-H] vs 10% [CTL]; P < .01). The laxity score thresholds were 0.75 for anterior laxity and -0.55 for internal rotation. With both scores above these thresholds, a patient was 3.18-fold more likely to be in the ACL-H group (95% CI, 1.74-5.83).

CONCLUSION

The healthy contralateral knees of patients with noncontact ACL injuries display different laxity values both for internal rotation and anterior displacement compared with healthy control knees. The identification of knee laxity profiles may be of relevance for primary and secondary prevention programs of noncontact ACL injuries.

Individualized ACL reconstruction

The pivot shift test is the only physical examination test capable of predicting knee function and osteoarthritis development after an ACL injury. However, because interpretation and performance of the pivot shift are subjective in nature, the validity of the pivot shift is criticized for not providing objective information for a complete surgical planning for the treatment of rotatory knee laxity. The aim of ACL reconstruction was eliminating the pivot shift sign. Many structures and anatomical characteristics can influence the grading of the pivot shift test and are involved in the genesis and magnitude of rotatory instability after an ACL injury. The objective quantification of the pivot shift may be able to categorize knee laxity and provide adequate information on which structures are affected besides the ACL. A new algorithm for rotational instability treatment is presented, accounting for patients' unique anatomical characteristics and objective measurement of the pivot shift sign allowing for an individualized surgical treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Can rotatory knee laxity be predicted in isolated anterior cruciate ligament surgery?

PURPOSE

Despite the overall success of the surgical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, some patients still present with instability symptoms even after the surgery, mainly due to the presence of associated lesions. At present, the pivot shift test has been reported to be the benchmark to assess rotatory knee laxity. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate rotatory knee laxity at time-zero in order to determine whether detected post-reconstruction laxity was predictable by its value measured before the reconstruction, which was hypothized to be influenced by the presence of associated lesions.

METHODS

Rotatory knee laxity was retrospectively analysed in 42 patients, including two different ACL reconstructions. The maximal anterior displacement and the absolute value of the posterior acceleration reached during the reduction of the tibial lateral compartment were intra-operatively acquired by using a navigation system and identified as discriminating parameters. For each parameter, statistical linear regression analysis (line slope and intercept) was performed between pre- and post-reconstruction values.

RESULTS

No statistically significant influence of the initial posterior acceleration on the post-reconstruction outcome was found (line slope, p > 0.05), although a statistically significant line intercept was indeed identified (p < 0.001). A statistically significant influence on the surgery outcome was instead found for the initial value of the anterior tibial displacement (line slope = 0.39, p = 0.004), meaning that, on average, about 40 % of the post-reconstruction lateral compartment displacement could be explained by the corresponding pre-reconstruction value. Both of these findings highlighted the importance of intra-operative quantification of rotatory knee laxity to identify correct indications for the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provided important implications for the future possibility of defining a quantifying tool able to assess rotatory knee laxity during ACL reconstruction. This could allow detection of additional injuries to secondary restraints by easily performing rotatory knee laxity tests, which in turn could reduce post-surgical recurrence of knee instability.

Differences in anterior cruciate ligament elasticity and force for knee flexion in women: oral contraceptive users versus non-oral contraceptive users

Eighty-two percent of sexually active women aged 15-44 have used oral contraceptive pills (OCP) in the United States. The OCP, an exogenous source of synthetic forms of steroid hormones, prevents ovulation. Hormone changes during the menstrual cycle (MC) are believed to have an impact on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) laxity due to estrogen. Because the estrogen receptor β resides on human connective tissue, OCP may have potential impact on tendon and ligament synthesis, structure, and biomechanical properties. Temperature has also been known to have an effect on tissue elasticity. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in ACL elasticity, force to flex the knee (FFK), and knee flexion-extension hysteresis (KFEH) between OCP users and non-OCP users. To investigate these changes, two different knee temperatures were measured. Nineteen young females were divided into two groups: OCP users and non-OCP users. Blood for estradiol serum concentration (E2) was taken before beginning the tests. ACL elasticity, FFK, and KFEH were assessed both at ambient temperature (22 °C) and after 38 °C warming of the leg to stabilize tissue temperature. Assessments were performed four times during the MC. Throughout the MC, ACL elasticity, FFK, and KFEH fluctuated in non-OCP users, but not in OCP users. At ambient temperature, ACL elasticity was significantly lower and FFK and KFEH were significantly higher in OCP users than non-OCP users (p < 0.05). But, no significant differences in FFK and KFEH between the two groups were found after warming to 38 °C.

Biomechanical analysis of the knee with partial anterior cruciate ligament disruption: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system

PURPOSE

To investigate the biomechanical function of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants in ACL-deficient knees with both partial and complete tears.

METHODS

Twenty partial ACL-deficient (group P), 20 complete ACL-deficient (group C), and 40 contralateral ACL-intact knees were examined. The end point during the Lachman test, side-to-side differences of KT-1000 measurements, and the pivot shift test were evaluated. Additionally, the side-to-side difference of anterior tibial translation during the Lachman test and the acceleration during the pivot shift test were calculated using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS).

RESULTS

The end point was found in 9 patients in group P, whereas it was not detected in group C. In KT-1000 measurements, the mean side-to-side differences were 3.8 ± 2.4 mm in group P and 5.4 ± 2.3 mm in group C. There was a significant difference between these 2 groups (P < .05). In the pivot shift test evaluation in group P, one patient was evaluated as grade 0, 17 patients as grade 1+, and 2 patients as grade 2+. In group C, 10 patients were evaluated as grade 1+, 9 patients as grade 2+, and one patient as grade 3+. Using the EMS, mean side-to-side differences during the Lachman test were 3.1 ± 2.1 mm in group P and 7.2 ± 3.2 mm in group C. The anterior-posterior displacement in group P was significantly less than that in group C (P < .05). In the quantitative pivot shift test, the mean acceleration in the contralateral ACL-intact knees was -632.7 ± 254.5 mm/s(2), whereas it was -1107.5 ± 398.9 mm/s(2) in group P and -1652.2 ± 754.9 mm/s(2) in group C. Significant differences were detected between the 3 knee conditions (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The quantitative assessments of knees with partial ACL ruptures during the Lachman test and the pivot shift test using the EMS showed less laxity than did knees with complete ACL tears, whereas their laxity was greater than the contralateral knees with intact ACLs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study of nonconsecutive patients.

Rotatory knee laxity

Evaluation of injured-knee laxity is essential for treatment selection, clinical follow-up, and research. Interest in rotatory knee laxity increased with implementation of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The pivot shift test represents a link between static testing with 1° of freedom and dynamic testing during functional activity. Difficulties lie in standardizing the performance of the pivot shift test and extracting measurable and relevant kinematic data. Noninvasive methodologies based on electromagnetic or acceleration sensors can evaluate the pivot shift in a quantitative and reliable manner. Further validation and reliability testing of devices for examination of rotatory laxity is warranted.

Current concept in rotational laxity control and evaluation in ACL reconstruction

Rotation combined with translation; compose the three-dimensional motion of the knee subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. The worldwide scientists were focused initially on the translation part of this complex 3D motion, but since the beginning of the century there was a large interest on knee rotational laxity study. Lot of paper reported new devices and results with an explosion since the beginning of the decade. The purpose of this review is to provide an extensive critical analysis of the literature and clarify the knowledge on this topic. We will start with a dismemberment of different rotational laxities reported: the rotation coupled with translation in 2D tests such as Lachman test and anterior drawer test; the rotational envelope considering the maximum internal external rotation; and the "active rotation" occurring in 3D Pivot-shift (PS) test. Then we will analyze the knee kinematics and the role of different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bundle on rotation. A review of different mechanical and radiological devices used to assess the different rotations on ACL deficient knees will be presented. Two groups will be analyzed, dynamic and static conditions of tests. Navigation will be described precisely; it was the starter of this recent interest in rotation studies. Opto electronic and electromagnetic navigation systems will be presented and analyzed. We will conclude with the last generation of rotational laxity assessment devices, using accelerometers, which are very promising.