Arthroscopic extraarticular reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament with gracilis tendon autograft - surgical technique

Lateral to medial fluoroscopic view improves the accuracy of identifying the MPFL femoral footprint using Schottle's technique

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effect of different fluoroscopy settings on the accuracy of locating Schottle's point during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

METHODS

The centre of the MPFL femoral footprint was identified and marked on 44 dry femurs. Two standard true lateral knee fluoroscopic images were obtained: (1) medial to lateral (ML) and (2) lateral to medial (LM). The deviation between the anatomically determined MPFL femoral footprint and the fluoroscopically identified point was measured on both fluoroscopic images. An 'acceptable tunnel location' was defined as within a 5- or 7-mm margin of error from the anatomic MPFL footprint. Distal femoral morphometric dimensions were also measured using digital calipers. Statistical analysis determined discrepancies between techniques and their relation to femoral morphometry.

RESULTS

The LM view yielded a significantly smaller distance between the anatomical MPFL footprint and Schottle's point compared to the ML view (3.2 ± 1.5 vs. 4.5 ± 2.1 mm, p < 0.001). The LM view achieved acceptable tunnel locations, meeting the 5-mm error criterion in 90.9% of cases, while the ML view achieved 65.9% (p < 0.001). Both views yielded acceptable tunnel locations at similar rates using the 7-mm error criterion (n.s.). The anatomic MPFL footprint was displaced towards the anterior and proximal location in the ML view in reference to the Schottle point. No correlation was observed between any of the morphometric measurements and the deviations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that using the LM fluoroscopic view improves the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement when identifying the MPFL footprint via the Schottle technique. Adopting the LM view in surgical practice will help surgeons locate the anatomical femoral footprint accurately, replicating the native MPFL and enhancing clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4, cadaveric study.

Comparison of five different fluoroscopic methods for identifying the MPFL femoral footprint

PURPOSE

The success of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is closely linked to the precise positioning of the femoral tunnel. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is commonly utilized to identify the MPFL footprint. This study aimed to ascertain the most accurate fluoroscopic method among the five previously described methods used to determine the MPFL femoral footprint.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using 44 well-preserved dry femur bones, the MPFL femoral insertion site was demarcated using anatomical bony landmarks, namely the center of the saddle sulcus between the medial epicondyle, adductor tubercle and gastrocnemius tubercle. Fluoroscopic true lateral knee images were acquired and measurements taken, referencing established methods by Schottle et al., Redfern et al., Wijdicks et al., Barnett et al., and Kaipel et al. The distance between anatomic and fluoroscopic MPFL footprints was then measured on digital fluoroscopic images. The accuracy of the locations was compared using a margin of error of 5 and 7 mm.

RESULTS

The Schottle method consistently emerged superior, showcasing the smallest mean distance (3.2 ± 1.2 mm) between the anatomic and radiographic MPFL footprints and a high in-point detection rate of 90.9% under 5 mm criteria. While the Redfern method displayed perfect accuracy (100%) within the 7 mm criteria, the Schottle method also performed 97.7% accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

For intraoperative identification of the MPFL footprint using fluoroscopy, the Schottle method is the most consistent and accurate among the assessed methods. Thus, its accuracy in detecting the MPFL footprint makes it recommended for MPFLR to ensure optimal outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, cadaveric study.

Patient-Individualized Identification of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Attachment Site to Femur Using "CLASS" MRI Sequences

Background

Malposition of the femoral tunnel during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction may increase the risk of recurrence of patellar dislocation due to isometric changes during flexion and extension. Different methods have been described to identify the MPFL isometric point using fluoroscopy. However, femoral tunnel malposition was found to be the cause of 38.1% of revisions due to patellar redislocation. This high rate of malposition has raised the question of individual anatomical variability.

Methods

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 80 native knees using the CLASS (MRI-generated Compressed Lateral and anteroposterior Anatomical Systematic Sequence) algorithm to identify the femoral MPFL insertion. The insertions were identified on the MRI views by 2 senior orthopaedic surgeons in order to assess the reliability and reproducibility of the method. The distribution of the MPFL insertion locations was then described in a 2-plane coordinate system and compared with MPFL insertion locations identified with other methods in previously published studies.

Results

The CLASS MPFL footprint was located 0.83 mm anterior to the posterior cortex (line 1) and 3.66 mm proximal to the Blumensaat line (line 2). Analysis demonstrated 0.90 and 0.89 reproducibility and 0.89 and 0.80 reliability of the CLASS method to identify the anatomical femoral MPFL insertion point. The distribution did not correlate with previously published data obtained with other methods. The definitions of the MPFL insertion point in the studies by Schöttle et al. and Fujino et al. most closely approximated the CLASS location in relation to the posterior femoral cortex, but there were significant differences between the CLASS method and all 4 previously published methods in relation to the proximal-distal location. When we averaged the distances from line 1 and line 2, the method that came closest to the CLASS method was that of Stephen et al., followed by the method of Schöttle et al.

Conclusions

The CLASS algorithm is a reliable and reproducible method to identify the MPFL femoral insertion from MRI views. Measurement using the CLASS algorithm shows substantial individual anatomical variation that may not be adequately captured with existing measurement methods. While further research must target translation of this method to clinical use, we believe that this method has the potential to create a safe template for sagittal fluoroscopic identification of the femoral tunnel during MPFL surgical reconstruction.

Level of Evidence

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A Novel Technique of Arthroscopic Femoral Tunnel Placement during Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation

Recurrent patellar dislocation is a commonly encountered patellofemoral disease. Prompt surgical intervention is indicated for recurrent dislocation to restore patellofemoral stability. As one of the most preferred procedures, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been implemented on a large scale. Femoral tunnel placement remains a crucial technical issue during MPFL reconstruction and is critical to ensure the isometry and proper tension of the graft. Currently, visual-palpatory anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy-guided radiographic landmarks comprise the main approaches to intraoperative femoral tunnel positioning. However, the accuracy of both methods has been questioned. This article introduces an arthroscopic femoral tunnel placement technique. Apart from traditional anteromedial and anterolateral portals, two auxiliary arthroscopic portals are specially designed. The adductor tubercle, the medial epicondyle and the posterior edge are selected as main anatomic landmarks and are directly visualized in sequence under arthroscope. The relative position between the femoral attachment of the MPFL and the three landmarks is measured on preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography, providing semi-quantified reference for intraoperative localization. This technique achieves minimally invasive tunnel placement without X-ray exposure, and especially suits obese patients for whom palpatory methods are difficult to perform.

Arthroscopic Anatomical Double-Bundle Medial Patellofemoral Complex Reconstruction Improves Clinical Outcomes in Treating Recurrent Patellar Dislocation Despite Trochlear Dysplasia, Elevated Tibial Tubercle-Trochlear Groove Distance, and Patellar Alta

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of arthroscopically assisted double-bundle medial patellofemoral complex reconstruction (MPFC-R).

METHODS

A retrospective review was carried out among adult patients who experienced at least 2 patellar dislocations and underwent primary arthroscopically assisted MPFC-R between January 2014 and November 2019. Dejour classification, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, and patellar height (with Insall-Salvati index) were measured. Pre- and postoperative patellar tilt were compared. Information on outcome scores, ability to return to sports, postoperative recurrent dislocations, and complications was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 42 MPFC-Rs in 39 patients were included. Mean age at surgery was 22.2 ± 7.6 years; 69.2% of patients were female. Mean follow-up was 47.3 ± 20.2 months. Seventy-four percent of cases had Dejour B (19.0%), C (33.3%), and D (21.4%) trochlear dysplasia; mean TT-TG distance was 19.6 ± 3.5 mm, and mean Insall-Salvati index was 1.21 ± 0.17. Mean patellar tilt decreased from 27.6 ± 11.6° to 9.4 ± 6.5° (P < .001). All patients had statistically significant (P < .001) improvement in mean International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (44.9 ± 18.2 to 87.5 ± 6.9), Lysholm (61.4 ± 16.6 to 94.1 ± 6.4), Kujala (56.0 ± 16.8 to 92.9 ± 5.3), and Tegner score (2.7 ± 1.3 to 4.6 ± 1.4). The majority of patients (96.9%) returned to sports, with 90.3% returning to the same or greater level of activity. No postoperative dislocations or subluxations were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopically assisted double-bundle MPFC-R is a promising procedure to treat recurrent patellar instability at 2- to 7-year mid-term follow-up, despite the presence of trochlear dysplasia, elevated TT-TG distance and patellar alta. The improvement of IKDC score exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in 95.2% patients, and 66.7% surpassed the patient acceptable symptomatic state based on postoperative IKDC score with no redislocations being reported at latest follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series, retrospective.

Utility of Diagnostic Ultrasound in the Assessment of Patellar Instability

Background

The use of imaging to diagnose patellofemoral instability is often limited by the inability to dynamically load the joint during assessment. Therefore, the diagnosis is typically based on physical examination using the glide test to assess and quantify lateral patellar translation. However, precise quantification with this technique remains difficult.

Purpose

To quantify patellar position using ultrasound imaging under dynamic loading conditions to distinguish between knees with and without medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) injury.

Study Design

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods

In 10 cadaveric knees, the medial patellofemoral distance was measured to quantify patellar position from 0° to 40° of knee flexion at 10° increments. Knees were evaluated at each flexion angle under unloaded conditions and with 20 N of laterally directed force on the patella to mimic the glide test. Patellar position measurements were made on ultrasound images obtained before and after MPFC transection and compared for significant differences. To determine the ability of medial patellofemoral measurements to differentiate between MPFC-intact and MPFC-deficient states, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the Delong test were used. The optimal cutoff value to distinguish between the deficient and intact states was determined using the Youden J statistic.

Results

A significant increase in medial patellofemoral distance was observed in the MPFC-deficient state as compared with the intact state at all flexion angles (P = .005 to P < .001). When compared with the intact state, MPFC deficiency increased medial patellofemoral distance by 32.8% (6 mm) at 20° of knee flexion under 20-N load. Based on ROC analysis and the J statistic, the optimal threshold for identifying MPFC injury was 19.2 mm of medial patellofemoral distance at 20° of flexion under dynamic loading conditions (area under the ROC curve = 0.93, sensitivity = 77.8%, specificity = 100%, accuracy = 88.9%).

Conclusion

Using dynamic ultrasound assessment, we found that medial patellofemoral distance significantly increases with disruption of the MPFC.

Clinical Relevance

Dynamic ultrasound measurements can be used to accurately detect the presence of complete MPFC injury.

Arthroscopic Patellofemoral Measurements Can Reliably Assess Patellar Instability

PURPOSE

To arthroscopically describe patellar position based on lateralization, tilt, and engagement, and compare measurements in normal, medial patellofemoral complex-(MPFC) deficient, and MPFC-reconstructed knees.

METHODS

In 10 cadaveric knees, arthroscopic patellar position was assessed by performing digital measurements on arthroscopic images obtained through a standard anterolateral portal. Lateralization was measured as millimeters overhang of the patella past the lateral edge of the lateral femoral condyle, viewing from the lateral gutter. Patellar tilt was calculated as the difference in medial and lateral distances from the patella to the trochlea, viewing from the sunrise view. Patellotrochlear distance was measured as the anteroposterior distance between the central trochlear groove and patella on the sunrise view. Measurements were obtained at 10° intervals of knee flexion from 0° to 90°, in intact knees (group 1), after arthroscopically transecting the MPFC fibers (group 2), and after MPFC reconstruction (group 3). Optimal cutoff values were identified to distinguish between intact versus MPFC-deficient states.

RESULTS

When compared to group 1, group 2 demonstrated increased patellar lateralization by 22.5% at 0°-40° knee flexion (P = .006), which corrected to baseline in group 3 (P = .006). Patellar tilt measurements demonstrated no differences between groups. Patellotrochlear distance increased by 21.0% after MPFC transection (P = .031) at 0°-40° knee flexion, with correction to baseline after MPFC reconstruction (P = .031). More than 7 mm of lateral overhang at 20°-30° flexion and >6 mm of patellotrochlear distance at 10°-20° flexion were found to indicate MPFC deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing standardized arthroscopic views, we identified significant increases in patellar lateralization and patellotrochlear distance in early knee flexion angles after MPFC transection, and these changes normalized after MPFC reconstruction.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Arthroscopic assessments of patellar position may be useful in evaluating patellofemoral stability during patellar stabilization surgery.

Biomechanical comparison of two medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction techniques: Quadriceps tendon fixation versus single-tunnel patella fixation with gracilis autograft did not differ in load to failure and stiffness

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultimate failure load and stiffness of two patellar fixation techniques for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction: (1) quadriceps tendon fixation (QT), (2) single tunnel (STG) patella fixation with gracilis autograft.

METHODS

A total of 16 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (eight matched pairs) were randomized into two groups (QT vs. STG). The MPFL reconstructions were subjected to cyclic loading for 10 cycles to 30 N and then tested to failure at a constant displacement rate of 15 mm/min using a materials-testing machine (MTS 810 Universal Testing System). Failure mode, ultimate failure load and stiffness were recorded for each cadaveric specimen.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mean ultimate failure load among groups (P = 0.35). The STG group failed at a mean ultimate load of 190.04 N [standard deviation (SD) 23.18] and the QT group failed at 206.24 N (SD 37.99). The STG group had a mean stiffness of 21.38 N/mm (SD 1.44). This was not significantly higher than the mean stiffness value achieved for the QT group at 20.36 N/mm (SD 1.3) (P = 0.19). In the QT group all reconstructions failed due to tendon rupture at the patella attachment. The reason for failure in the STG group was the graft-suture connection.

CONCLUSIONS

This cadaver study showed no statistically significant difference in biomechanical performance of the evaluated patella fixation techniques, in terms of maximum load to failure and stiffness. Both techniques are reliable in terms of biomechanical properties and could offer additional surgical solutions.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Tips and Tricks to Get It Right

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is used increasingly to treat patellar instability. A number of different techniques have been described to perform this procedure. In this article, we review common pearls and pitfalls to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, as well as tips for troubleshooting the procedure. A special emphasis is placed on femoral tunnel position and intraoperative adjustments that can be made to improve outcomes.

Application of a true lateral virtual radiograph from 3D-CT to identify the femoral reference point of the medial patellofemoral ligament

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) to describe the femoral reference point of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) on a virtual true lateral radiograph reconstructed from a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) image and (2) to compare this point with that of patients without patellofemoral instability and with Schöttle's point.

METHODS

A total of 26 consecutive patients (29 affected knees) with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD), who underwent MPFL reconstruction were included in this study (4 males; 22 females; mean age, 24.0 years old). Using a true lateral 3DCT image, the MPFL femoral insertion was identified and marked with a 2-mm circle, and this image was reconstructed as a virtual true lateral radiograph. Following Schöttle's method, the point of intersection was described by their anterior-posterior and proximal-distal positions. As a control population, 29 age- and gender-matched patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries were also analysed.

RESULTS

The points in RPD patients were located significantly posterior (-2.5 ± 2.3 mm, p < 0.01) to the line representing an extension of the posterior cortex of the femur and distal (- 6.9 ± 2.4 mm, p < 0.01) to the posterior origin of the medial femoral condyle compared with those in the control population. The mean reference point of RPD patients was located in a 3.8-mm posterior and 4.4-mm distal position compared with Schöttle's point.

CONCLUSIONS

An anatomical and radiographic femoral reference point of the MPFL on a true lateral virtual radiograph was described with our method. In patients with RPD, this reference point was identified to be more posterior and distal to Schöttle's point. More anatomical and individualized MPFL reconstruction will be secured using our method.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Biomechanical evaluation of three patellar fixation techniques for MPFL reconstruction: Load to failure did not differ but interference screw stabilization was stiffer than suture anchor and suture-knot fixation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the maximum load to failure and stiffness of three medial patella-femoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction techniques: (i) suture anchor fixation (SA), (ii) interference screw fixation (SF), and (iii) suture knot (SK) patellar fixation. The null hypothesis was that the comparison between these three different patella fixation techniques would show no difference in the ultimate failure load and stiffness.

METHODS

Reconstruction of the MPFL with gracilis tendon autograft was performed in 12 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (24 knees total; mean age, 63.6 [Formula: see text] 8.0 years). The specimens were randomly distributed into 3 groups of 8 specimens; SA reconstruction was completed with two 3.0-mm metal suture anchors; (SF) fixation was accomplished by two 6-mm bio-composite interference screws; SK fixation at the lateral side of the patella was accomplished after drilling two semi-patellar tunnels with a diameter of 4.5 mm. The reconstructions were subjected to cyclic loading for 10 cycles to 30 N and tested to failure at a constant displacement rate of 15 mm/min using a materials-testing machine (MTS 810 Universal Testing System). The final load of failure (N), stiffness (N / mm) and failure mode was recorded in each specimen and followed by statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mean ultimate failure load among the three groups. The SK group failed at a mean ([Formula: see text] SD) ultimate load of 253.5 [Formula: see text] 38.2 N, the SA group failed at 243 [Formula: see text] 41.9 N and the SF group at 263.2 [Formula: see text] 9.06 N. The SF group had a mean stiffness of 37.8 [Formula: see text] 5.7 N/mm. This was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the mean stiffness value achieved for the SK group 21.4 [Formula: see text] 9.5 N/mm and the SA group 18.7 [Formula: see text] 3.4 N/mm. The most common mode of failure in the SA group was anchor pullout, and in the SK group was failure at the graft-suture interface. All the reconstructions in the SF group failed due to tendon graft slippage from the tunnel.

CONCLUSION

Load to failure was not significantly different between the 3 techniques. However, screw fixation was found to be significantly stronger than the anchor and the suture knot fixation in terms of rigidity of the reconstruction. From a clinical point of view, all methods of fixation can be used reliably for MPFL reconstruction, since they were found to be stronger than the native MPFL.

Home-Based Intravenous Analgesia With an Elastomeric Pump After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair: A Case Series

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to show our experience using elastomeric pumps for postoperative pain relief after outpatient medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

Patients (N = 78) with recurrent patella dislocation who underwent MPFL repair using an autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft were included. After discharge, pain was controlled using intravenous analgesia infused by an elastomeric pump for 48 hours. Outcomes regarding pain, complications, overall satisfaction, and knee functionality were assessed.

FINDINGS

Early postoperative pain was mild in 53.8% of patients, and 30.8% patients had no pain at all. Twenty-four hours after surgery, 38.5% patients presented no pain, which increased to 53.8% at 72 hours. Nausea was experienced by 2.6% patients as was vomiting (7.7%) and drowsiness (2.6%). The mean score for patient satisfaction regarding the treatment was 90.2 (60.0-100.0). Moreover, postoperative knee functionality 12 months after the procedure proved to be statistically significantly superior (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative analgesia using an intravenous elastomeric pump allows performance of MPFL reconstruction as an outpatient procedure with satisfactory pain control, complication rates and patient satisfaction.

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using two blind transverse semi-patella tunnels and an implant-free technique for patellar fixation: a technical note

Background

The double-bundle technique with two points of patellar fixation in the upper half of the patella replicating the broad attachment site of the native medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the most commonly performed procedure for MPFL reconstruction. Complete transverse patella tunnels pose a threat to the integrity of the patella. We present an implant-free, double-bundle technique for MPFL reconstruction with gracilis autograft, overcoming the problem of complete patella bone tunnels and over-drilling.

Methods

After standard gracilis graft harvesting, the anteromedial side of the patella is exposed. With the guidance of an anterior-cruciate-ligament (ACL) tibia-aiming device, two 2-mm parallel guide pins are inserted from medial to lateral at the upper half of the patella. The two guide pins are over-drilled with a cannulated 4.5-mm drill bit 2-cm deep, to create two transverse blind semi-patellar tunnels. For the femoral fixation, a 2.4-mm guide pin with an eyelet is drilled at the Schöttle point and over-reamed with a 6-mm cannulated reamer to a depth of 30 mm. The two free ends of the graft (with two running Krakow sutures placed) are pulled into the two patella tunnels and the graft sutures are tied together with tension for stable graft fixation at the lateral patella rim. With the help of a femoral suture loop (which is inserted in the femoral bone tunnel), the graft-loop is advanced into the femoral bone tunnel and the graft is finally fixed with a 7-mm interference screw at 30° of knee flexion.

Results

The utilization of blind transverse tunnels (not trans-patellar tunnels) offers the advantage of avoiding stress risers at the patella. Thanks to the ACL tibia aiming device, multiple drilling, and breaching of the anterior patellar cortex or articular surface of the patella is avoided.

Conclusions

This implant-free, and consequently affordable technique, isolated or combined with bony procedures, minimizes possibilities for perioperative bony complications at the patella fixation site.

Midterm Results after Implant-Free Patellar Fixation Technique for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Problems and complications concerning the patellar fixation in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) have been reported. The purpose of this retrospective study was to systematically analyze the surgical technique for MPFLR with a V: -shaped patellar bonetunnel for implant-free fixation of an autologous gracilis tendon, allowing early functional rehabilitation, regarding restoration of the patellofemoral stability, patient satisfaction, return to sports, and technique-specific complications. In 2010, 128 cases of consecutive isolated MPFLR were performed. All these cases were included. After a minimum follow-up of 3 years, 104 cases were retrospectively analyzed (follow-up: 81.3%) with regard to redislocation, subjective functional outcome (Tegner's score and sports level compared with preoperative level), patient satisfaction, revision surgery, and technique-specific complications. After a follow-up of 45.7 ± 3.2 months, 101 of 104 cases (97.1%) showed no redislocation. Mean Tegner's score was 5.1 ± 1.8 (range, 2-9). A total of 61.5% patients reported about a higher sports level compared with their preoperative level. The patient satisfaction was high with 94.2%. In two cases (1.9%), technique-specific problems occurred as the bone bridge of the V: -shaped tunnel was insufficient due to a malpositioning of the aiming device. No further technique-specific problems occurred and no revision surgery was necessary during the observational period. The presented surgical technique is safe and it reliably restores the patellofemoral stability, with a low rate of redislocations, an excellent subjective functional outcome, and a high-patient-reported satisfaction. No major technique-specific complications occurred.

Outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in patients with patella alta

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes and the results of knee functional scores in patients with normal patellar height and patella alta who underwent isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 37 knees from 33 patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction were included. Retrospectively, the postoperative clinical results were compared using the Kujala and Lysholm scores in the group of patients with normal patellar height and in those with patella alta.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 37 patients; 16 knees of 14 patients in the group with normal patellar height, 21 knees of 19 patients in the group with patella alta. In the first group, the mean Kujala score was 85.8 and the mean Lysholm score was 85.6. In the second, the mean Kujala score was 78.1 and the mean Lysholm score was 79.7. No significant differences were observed between the groups in relation to the Lysholm (p = 0.296) and Kujala scores (p = 0.181).

CONCLUSION

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction presented similar results in patients with normal patellar height and patella alta.

Origin and insertion of the medial patellofemoral ligament: a systematic review of anatomy

PURPOSE

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the major medial soft-tissue stabiliser of the patella, originating from the medial femoral condyle and inserting onto the medial patella. The exact position reported in the literature varies. Understanding the true anatomical origin and insertion of the MPFL is critical to successful reconstruction. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine these locations.

METHODS

A systematic search of published (AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) and unpublished literature databases was conducted from their inception to the 3 February 2016. All papers investigating the anatomy of the MPFL were eligible. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified CASP tool. A narrative analysis approach was adopted to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

After screening and review of 2045 papers, a total of 67 studies investigating the relevant anatomy were included. From this, the origin appears to be from an area rather than (as previously reported) a single point on the medial femoral condyle. The weighted average length was 56 mm with an 'hourglass' shape, fanning out at both ligament ends.

CONCLUSION

The MPFL is an hourglass-shaped structure running from a triangular space between the adductor tubercle, medial femoral epicondyle and gastrocnemius tubercle and inserts onto the superomedial aspect of the patella. Awareness of anatomy is critical for assessment, anatomical repair and successful surgical patellar stabilisation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of anatomical dissections and imaging studies, Level IV.

Radiographic Location Does Not Ensure a Precise Anatomic Location of the Femoral Fixation Site in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

A frequently used method to determine the anatomic femoral fixation point in the operating room during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the radiographic method. However, the ability of this radiological method to establish an anatomic femoral attachment point might not be as accurate as expected.

Purpose:

(1) To evaluate the accuracy of the radiological method to locate the anatomic femoral fixation point in MPFL reconstruction surgery and (2) to determine the factors influencing the predictability of this method to obtain this objective.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 100 consecutive 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) knee examinations were performed at 0° of extension in 87 patients treated for chronic lateral patellar instability. For each knee, 2 virtual 7 mm–diameter femoral tunnels were created: 1 using the adductor tubercle as a landmark (anatomic tunnel) and the other according to the radiological method described by Schöttle et al (radiographic tunnel). We measured the percentage of overlap between both tunnels. Moreover, of the 100 included knees, 10 were randomly selected for a variability study.

Results:

Considering an overlap area greater than 50% as reasonable, the radiographic method achieved this in only 38 of the 100 knees. Intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent. There was a trend for female patients with severe trochlear dysplasia to have less overlap. This model accounted for 64.2% of the initial variability in the data.

Conclusion:

An exact anatomic femoral tunnel placement could not be achieved with the radiographic method. Radiography provided only an approximation and should not be the sole basis for the femoral attachment location. Moreover, in female patients with severe trochlear dysplasia, the radiographic method was less accurate in determining the anatomic femoral fixation point, although differences were not statistically significant.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Dual Patella Docking Technique

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injuries are common in children and young adults. In patients with recurrent patellar dislocations with normal lower-extremity alignment, anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL has been shown to restore patellar stability. We describe a technique that creates an anatomic reconstruction using a dual docking technique into the patella. Our technique is simple and efficacious for reconstructing the MPFL without implant fixation in the patella, allowing a maximal bone-tendon interface for healing.

Cyclic Testing of 3 Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques

Background:

Several techniques are available to secure the graft to the patella during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. The biomechanical properties of these techniques remain unknown.

Purpose:

To compare the biomechanical properties of 3 MPFL patellar fixation techniques: bone tunnels (BT), PushLock anchors (PL), and tenodesis screws (TS).

Study Design:

Controlled laboratory study.

Methods:

Forty-five MPFL reconstructions were performed using 3 different reconstruction techniques (BT, PL, and TS). The specimens were randomly assigned, with 15 specimens in each of the 3 groups. Cyclic loading (500 cycles) and load-to-failure testing were performed. Gap formation after 100 and 500 cycles, ultimate load to failure, and stiffness were measured.

Results:

Six constructs failed during cyclic loading, 5 in the PL group (33%) and 1 in the TS group (6.7%). After 100 cycles, differences in gap formation were found between the PL and BT groups (4.48 vs 3.62 mm, P < .03) and between the PL and TS groups (4.48 vs 2.28 mm, P < .0001). After 500 cycles, differences in gap formation were found between the BT and TS groups (6.63 vs 4.16 mm, P < .002) and between the PL and TS groups (7.89 vs 4.16 mm, P < .005). The PL group was found to have a lower ultimate load to failure when compared with the BT group (161.4 vs 258.3 N, P = .019) and the TS group (161.4 vs 237.1 N, P = .009). Group differences in stiffness did not reach statistical significance among the 3 groups (PL, 33.72 N/mm; BT, 37.50 N/mm; TS, 43.00 N/mm).

Conclusion:

The TS and BT groups have more ideal biomechanical properties than the PL group, as demonstrated by less displacement during cyclic loading and a higher load to failure.

Clinical Relevance:

Fixation of the patellar limbs during MPFL reconstruction may be optimized with the use of TS or BT over a PL technique.

Does radiographic location ensure precise anatomic location of the femoral fixation site in medial patellofemoral ligament surgery?

PURPOSE

To correlate the location of the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral fixation site in knees suffering a chronic lateral patellar instability, by using radiographic references and by using the most important anatomic reference point (i.e. the adductor tubercle) identified by means of 3-dimensional (3D) surface reconstructions by computed tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS

Thirty consecutive knee 3D-CT examinations at 0º of knee extension were obtained from patients (20 females, 10 males; median age of 23.5 years; range, 14-48 years) treated for chronic lateral patellar instability with at least two documented patellar dislocations. For each knee, three virtual 7-mm-diameter femoral tunnels were created. One of the tunnels used an anatomic fixation landmark (anatomic fixation), while the other two used established radiologic methods. We calculated the percentage of the anatomic tunnel covered by the tunnel created according to the method described by Schoettle, and the percentage of the anatomic tunnel covered by the tunnel created according to the method described by Stephen. These percentages were compared using paired Student's t test.

RESULTS

The percentage of anatomic tunnel area covered by the femoral tunnel created using Schoettle's method was 36.7 ± 25.2 %. When using Stephen's method, the percentage of overlap with the anatomic femoral tunnel was 25.5 ± 21.5 %. There were no significant differences between the two radiographic methods (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

None of the standard radiographic methods allowed a precise anatomic femoral placement. Conventional radiographic identification of the femoral graft placement site is only an approximation and should not be the sole basis for femoral attachment location.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Correlation of the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance with the Q-angle

PURPOSE

The Q-angle has been used for years to quantify lateralization of the patella. The tibial tuberosity-trochlea groove distance (TT-TG distance) was introduced to analyse patellar tracking. Does a significant correlation exist between these two parameters? Do other significant interrelations exist between the Q-angle/TT-TG distance, torsion of the femur and tibia, the frontal axis, overall leg length, gender, former patellar dislocation, BMI?

METHODS

One hundred knees in 55 patients with patellofemoral symptoms were included in a prospective study. All patients underwent clinical examination, including measurement of the Q-angle. A torsional CT was obtained from all patients.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient was 0.33/0.34 (left/right leg), showing that the TT-TG distance tends to rise in direct ratio to a rising Q-angle. Thus, a significant correlation was found (p = 0.017). Femoral and tibial torsion had a positive effect on the TT-TG distance, but showed no significant correlation. Leg length had a significant effect on the TT-TG distance (p = 0.04). The frontal axis had a nonsignificant influence on the Q-angle or TT-TG distance. On average, the Q-angle in women was 2.38° greater than it was in men, but the difference was not significant.

CONCLUSION

A significant correlation was noted between the Q-angle and the TT-TG distance. Both depend on various parameters and must be assessed for the analysis of patellofemoral maltracking. The Q-angle did not differ significantly between men and women; thus, the conclusion is that no different ranges need not be used.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level III.

"Basket weave technique" for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: Clinical outcome of a prospective study

BACKGROUND

Bone tunneling and implants with rigid fixations for medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction are known to compromise results and are avoidable, especially in skeletally immature subjects. This study was to assess if these deficiencies were overcome with the technique devised by the author which avoids implants and bone tunnels. Results were assessed for complication rate and outcome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty six knees of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation were treated in the past 49 months by MPFL reconstruction. Thirty nine were female and 17 male knees. The mean age was 20.6 years (range 9-48 years). Mean followup was 26 months. Five knees had previously failed stabilization procedures. Thirty one cases had Dejours Type A or B and 12 had Type C trochlear dysplasia. Arthroscopy was performed for associated injuries and loose bodies. Seven knees required loose body removal. Five knees underwent lateral retinacular release. Four knees had tibial tuberosity transfer. One knee had an associated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. An anatomical MPFL reconstruction was performed using hamstring autograft without the need for intraoperative fluoroscopy. Only soft tissue fixation was necessary with this newly devised technique and suturing. A rapid rehabilitation protocol was implemented with monthly followup until normalcy and 6 monthly thereafter.

RESULTS

All achieved full range of motion and normal mediolateral stability. There was no recurrence of dislocation. No major surgery related complications. One patella fracture at 8 months was due to a fall developed terminal restriction of flexion. Those in sports could return to their sporting activities (Tegner 1-9). Cases with osteochondral fractures had occasional pain that subsided in 1 year. Mean Kujala score improved from 64.3 to 99.69 with KOOS score near normal in all.

CONCLUSION

This new method of MPFL reconstruction gives excellent results. It avoids complications related to bone tunneling and implants. It is a safe, effective, reliable and reproducible technique.

Radiographic Reference Points Are Inaccurate With and Without a True Lateral Radiograph: The Importance of Anatomy in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported methods for radiographically delineating medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) femoral tunnel position on a true lateral knee radiograph. However, obtaining a true lateral fluoroscopic radiograph intraoperatively can be challenging, rendering radiographic methods for tunnel positioning potentially inaccurate.

PURPOSE

To quantify the magnitude of MPFL femoral tunnel malposition that occurs on true lateral and aberrant lateral knee radiographs when using a previously reported radiographic technique for MPFL femoral tunnel localization.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected to expose the MPFL femoral insertion and surrounding medial knee anatomy. True lateral and aberrant lateral knee radiographs at 2.5°, 5°, and 10° off-axis were obtained with a standard mini C-arm in 4 orientations: anterior to posterior, posterior to anterior, caudal, and cephalad. A previously reported radiographic method for MPFL femoral localization was performed on all radiographs and compared in reference to the anatomic MPFL attachment center.

RESULTS

The radiographic point, as previously described, was a mean distance of 4.1 mm from the anatomic MPFL attachment on a true lateral knee radiograph. The distance between the anatomic MPFL attachment center and the radiographic point significantly increased on aberrant lateral knee radiographs with as little as 5° of rotational error in 3 of 4 orientations of rotation when a standard mini C-arm was used. This corresponded to a malposition of 7.5, 9.2, and 8.1 mm on 5°-aberrant radiographs in the anterior-posterior, posterior-anterior, and cephalad orientations, respectively (P < .005). In the same 3 orientations of rotation, MPFL tunnel malposition on the femur exceeded 5 mm on 2.5° aberrant radiographs.

CONCLUSION

The commonly utilized radiographic point, as previously described for MPFL femoral tunnel placement, results in inaccurate tunnel localization on a true lateral radiograph, and this inaccuracy is perpetuated with aberrant radiography. Aberrant lateral knee imaging of as little as 5° off-axis from true lateral has a significant effect on placement of a commonly used radiographic point relative to the anatomic MPFL femoral attachment center and results in nonanatomic MPFL tunnel placement.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study demonstrates that radiographic localization of the MPFL femoral tunnel results in inaccurate tunnel placement on a true lateral radiograph, particularly when there is deviation from a true lateral fluoroscopic image, which can be difficult to obtain intraoperatively. Assessing anatomy directly intraoperatively, rather than relying solely on radiographs, may help avoid MPFL tunnel malposition.

Widespread Implementation of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability Maintains Functional Outcomes at Midterm to Long-Term Follow-up While Decreasing Complication Rates: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Our primary purpose was to evaluate whether complications have increased or functional outcomes have changed as medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been adopted by more surgeons at more institutions over recent years. Our secondary purpose was to further define the complication profile of MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed on January 12, 2014, using the keywords "medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction," "patellar instability reconstruction," "patellofemoral ligament reconstruction," and "MPFL." Articles meeting our inclusion criteria were reviewed. Outcome measures, functional failures, complications, graft choice, and surgical technique were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four articles met our exclusion and inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Nineteen articles were "new" additions to the literature, whereas 15 had previously been reported on in prior analyses ("old"). The 19 new articles reported a statistically significant decrease in functional failure rates, from 9.55% in older studies to 4.77% in more recent studies (P < .001). The major complication rate dropped from 2.01% to 0.46% in the newer studies (P = .005), and the minor complication rate decreased from 6.53% to 4.00% (P = .06). Postoperative Kujala scores did not show a statistically significant change between newer and older publications (89.0 [SD, 3.7] and 89.4 [SD, 4.9], respectively; P = .55). Comparing results by fixation type, as well as by graft choice, showed no statistically significant differences in terms of outcomes or complication profile.

CONCLUSIONS

With nearly twice the number of medical centers performing reconstruction of the MPFL and outcomes reported on nearly double the number of patients in recent years, functional outcomes remain favorable as complication and failure profiles are improving. Furthermore, despite a wide array of fixation techniques, as well as multiple options for graft constructs, there are no statistically or clinically significant differences in functional outcomes over time. This finding highlights the efficacy and adoptability of MPFL reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent patellar instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of mixed-level studies.

Anatomic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament using the fascia lata as an autograft

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) ensures stability of the patella against lateral forces. In cases of recurrent lateral patellar luxation, surgical reconstruction of the MPFL has an important role in treating lateral patellar instability. Several biomechanical studies have presented valuable pieces of information about various techniques for re-creating this medial patellofemoral complex mainly using the gracilis tendon as an autograft. However, with the increasing number of MPFL reconstructions, there are also an increasing number of patients requiring revision MPFL reconstruction. Therefore alternative graft options may become more relevant. Furthermore, the gracilis tendon as a tubular graft may not be able to fully restore patellofemoral kinematics compared with the native MPFL. This article introduces a surgical technique using the fascia lata as an alternative graft option for the anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL.

Troubleshooting the Femoral Attachment During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: Location, Location, Location

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been recognized as an important soft tissue restraint in preventing lateral patellar translation. As many patients with acute or chronic patellar instability will have a deficient MPFL, reconstruction of this ligament is becoming more common. Appropriately, significant research has been undertaken regarding graft biomechanics and techniques, as intraoperative errors in graft placement often result in poor patient outcomes. Although the research has not answered all of the dilemmas encountered during reconstruction, publications consistently emphasize the importance of re-establishing an anatomic femoral attachment. The purpose of this study was to briefly review the current literature on MPFL reconstruction. Graft selection and patellar graft attachment and fixation are discussed, but the main focus is the femoral attachment as this is where most errors are seen and, unfortunately, where getting it right appears to matter the most. Using a sawbones knee model, the concepts of an MPFL graft that is “high and tight” or “low and loose” are presented, with the goal of providing physicians with intraoperative tools to adjust an incorrectly placed femoral MPFL attachment. This model is also used to justify the recommendation of graft fixation in 30° to 45° of knee flexion.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction as an isolated or combined procedure for recurrent patellar instability

PURPOSE

The principal aim of this study was to report the outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, used as either an isolated procedure or in combination with another stabilization procedure, for the primary treatment of recurrent patellar instability.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2012, 45 patients with recurrent patellar instability and no prior stabilization surgery had an MPFL reconstruction by a single surgeon, either as an isolated procedure or in combination with another stabilization procedure. Questionnaires detailing patellar instability since surgery, knee pain, ability to negotiate stairs, and sports participation were completed, and data regarding examination and radiological findings were collected from the medical record.

RESULTS

A total of 36 (80%) patients completed the questionnaire at a mean of 3.1 years (minimum 1 year), whilst a further 11% had clinical follow-up of greater than 1 year. Four patients were excluded due to lack of adequate follow-up. Thirty-one patients had an isolated MPFL reconstruction and none had further patellar instability. Of the ten patients who had a combined procedure, one experienced recurrent instability. Return to sport rates were 81 and 57% for the isolated and combined groups, respectively, with the majority returning to strenuous sport (81 and 57%, respectively). Most patients (96 and 80%) could negotiate stairs without difficulty, whilst 38 and 40% reported some degree of anterior knee pain.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that satisfactory results can be obtained using MPFL reconstruction either in isolation or in combination to treat recurrent patellar instability. Whether the indications for an isolated MPFL can be extended further remains unclear.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Clinical outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and autologous chondrocyte implantation following recurrent patella dislocation

PURPOSE

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a well-established treatment option in recurrent patella dislocation. The combination with associated retropatellar cartilage lesions are severe injuries and very difficult to treat. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our clinical results of MPFL reconstruction and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI).

METHODS

Thirteen patients with recurrent patella dislocation were treated with a combination of MPFL reconstruction and ACI at our institution between 2010 and 2014. All patients had at least 2 patella dislocations. The posttraumatic cartilage lesions were grade IV according to the ICRS and were localized retropatellar in 8 cases and at the lateral femoral condyle in 2 cases. The mean defect size was 7.2±3.5 cm2 (3-12 cm2). Subjective and objective scores were assessed before surgery and at f/u, as well as radiologic parameters and cartilage status on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

Ten patients (5 male, 5 female) with a mean follow-up of 2 years (minimum 1 year to 4 years) were enrolled in the study. At latest clinical follow-up, all patients had a stable patella with no signs of instability and all patients showed improved subjective and objective scores. Lysholm score increased to 74.1±18.7 (48-99), KOOS score to 74.4±16.9 (57-95), IKDC subjective to 63.9±22.1 (34-93) and Kujala score to 73.8±25.1 (50-100). The post-operative modified MOCART score for quality assessment of the ACI on MRI was an average of 13.7±1.8 points (11-16), with a complete fill of the defect in 80% of lesions.

CONCLUSION

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with simultaneous ACI showed good clinical results in recurrent patella dislocation with traumatic cartilage lesions grade IV. No patella re-dislocation occurred and the ACI was successful in 80% of patients according to MRI. Subjective and objective scores improved but combined surgery is inferior to reports from the literature on MPFL reconstruction alone without cartilage damage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

Minimally invasive medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with fascia lata allograft: surgical technique

The present paper describes a new minimally invasive anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, using a fascia lata allograft as graft source and arthroscopy to obtain balanced fixation throughout the range of motion.

Guidelines for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in chronic lateral patellar instability

The standard surgical approach for chronic lateral patellar instability with at least two documented patellar dislocations is to stabilize the patella by using an anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with a mini-open technique and a graft that is stronger than the native ligament to compensate for the uncorrected predisposing factors underlying patellar instability. Even though medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction has evolved notably during the past two decades, many aspects of the surgical technique need to be refined, and more information is needed toward this end. Adequate positioning of the graft on the femur, as well as inducing the appropriate degree of tension, are critical steps for the overall outcome of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Moreover, it is necessary in some cases to pair medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with other surgical procedures to address additional patellar instability risk factors, such as trochlear dysplasia, malalignment, and patella alta.

Medial patellofemoral ligament: anatomy, injury and treatment in the adolescent knee

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traumatic and nontraumatic patellofemoral instability (PFI) in children and adolescents is a complex problem. It is determined by a large number of mechanical and pathomorphologic conditions, mainly seen in nontraumatic dislocations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although conservative treatment with a short immobilization, followed by early passive motion and isometric quadriceps strengthening, can be considered in real traumatic dislocations without any cartilaginous injury, a surgical intervention should be considered in atraumatic cases. As 90% of PFI are nontraumatic and correlated with skeletal deformities, the redislocation rate is reported to be up to 80% after initial conservative treatment. To optimize the results, the causing disorder for PFI has to be considered imperatively. In addition to bony disorder, further risk factors have to be taken into consideration for determining the optimal time for surgery. As biomechanical and clinical studies have shown the importance of the medial patellofemoral complex, especially the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), against patellar lateralization, the reconstruction or minimally invasive double-bundle reconstruction of the MPFL is the main surgical technique to treat PFI in children, as it can be used even in open epiphysial cartilage. Further surgical interventions correcting bone deformities, such as trochleoplasty or tibial tubercle osteotomies addressing lower limb deformities, should be performed after closure of the epiphysial cartilage.

SUMMARY

It is the goal of this overview to explain the pathoanatomy of PFI, the demanding clinical and radiological examinations and treatment options.