Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular PDS augmentation for complete AC joint dislocation showed insufficient properties in a cadaver model

Biomechanical Efficacy of Tape Cerclage as an Augment or Stand-alone for Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Loss of initial reduction of the acromioclavicular joint after coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction remains a challenge for various repair techniques. Previous studies using polydioxanone suture cerclage augments for CC ligament reconstruction demonstrated poor clinical and biomechanical outcomes. Tape-style sutures have recently gained popularity because of their added stiffness and strength relative to traditional sutures. These tape cerclage systems have yet to be biomechanically studied in CC ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of a tape cerclage system as an augment to CC ligament reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 24 human cadaveric shoulders were utilized. These were divided into 4 repair groups: anatomic CC ligament reconstruction (ACCR), ACCR with a tape cerclage augment (ACCR + C), tendon graft sling with a cerclage augment (TGS + C), or tape cerclage sling alone (CS). The repairs underwent superior/inferior cyclic loading to evaluate for displacement. Specimens were visually inspected for cortical erosion by the tape cerclage after cyclic loading. Finally, the constructs underwent superior plane load-to-failure testing.

RESULTS

Less displacement after cyclic loading was observed in the ACCR + C (mean ± SD, 0.42 ± 0.32 mm), TGS + C (0.92 ± 0.42 mm), and CS (0.93 ± 0.39 mm) groups as compared with the ACCR group (4.42 ± 3.40 mm; P = .002). ACCR + C (813.3 ± 257.5 N), TGS + C (558.0 ± 120.7 N), and CS (759.5 ± 173.7 N) demonstrated significantly greater load at failure relative to ACCR (329.2 ± 118.2 N) (P < .001). ACCR + C (60.88 ± 17.3 N/mm), TGS + C (44.97 ± 9.15 N/mm), and CS (54.52 ± 14.24 N/mm) conferred greater stiffness than ACCR (27.43 ± 6.94 N/mm) (P = .001). No cortical erosion was demonstrated in any specimen after cyclic loading.

CONCLUSION

In a cadaveric model at time zero, repairs utilizing a tape cerclage system confer significantly greater load to failure and stiffness, as well as decreased displacement with cyclic loading, when compared with traditional ACCR repair.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Tape cerclage augmentation may provide a useful augment for CC ligament reconstruction.

Acromioclavicular reconstruction techniques after acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review of biomechanical studies

BACKGROUND

Residual horizontal instability after surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint injuries is seen as a potential cause of suboptimal clinical outcomes. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the acromioclavicular capsule/ligaments are the primary restraints for anteroposterior translation. However, limited studies have addressed the biomechanics of a reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule/ligaments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical role of acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques after an acromioclavicular joint injury.

METHODS

A search was carried out on the databases Medline and EMBASE, and was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Biomechanical studies addressing horizontal and vertical displacement or joint stiffness after reconstructing the acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with or without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction, were included.

FINDINGS

Nineteen studies were included in this review after screening and eligibility assessment. Five of them investigated different sole acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques. In 10 studies, a sole coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was compared to a coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with additional acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction. The remaining 4 studies compared different acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques with each other.

INTERPRETATION

Several testing protocols to evaluate acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction have been described and can make it difficult to compare the results of the different studies. Acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction may provide increased anteroposterior and rotational stability but an optimal reconstruction technique, which mimics all biomechanical characteristics of the native joint is not yet available.

Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability - a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery

BACKGROUND

There exists a vast number of surgical treatment options for acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries, and the current literature has yet to determine an equivocally superior treatment. AC joint repair has a long history and dates back to the beginning of the twentieth century.

MAIN BODY

Since then, over 150 different techniques have been described, covering open and closed techniques. Low grade injuries such as Type I-II according to the modified Rockwood classification should be treated conservatively, while high-grade injuries (types IV-VI) may be indicated for operative treatment. However, controversy exists if operative treatment is superior to nonoperative treatment, especially in grade III injuries, as functional impairment due to scapular dyskinesia or chronic pain remains concerning following non-operative treatment. Patients with a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle and without significant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIA) may benefit from non-interventional approaches, in contrast to patients with overriding of the clavicle and therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction (Type IIIB). If these patients are considered non-responders to a conservative approach, an anatomic AC joint reconstruction using a hybrid technique should be considered. In chronic AC joint injuries, surgery is indicated after failed nonoperative treatment of 3 to 6 months. Anatomic AC joint reconstruction techniques along with biologic augmentation (e.g. Hybrid techniques, suture fixation) should be considered for chronic high-grade instabilities, accounting for the lack of intrinsic healing and scar-forming potential of the ligamentous tissue in the chronic setting. However, complication and clinical failure rates remain high, which may be a result of technical failures or persistent horizontal and rotational instability.

CONCLUSION

Future research should focus on addressing horizontal and rotational instability, to restore native physiological and biomechanical properties of the AC joint.

Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular Stabilization With Anchorless Transosseous Double-Row Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Repair: The Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

The current concept procedures in the acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation should be divided into 2 types of structure restoration: those that provide coracoclavicular stabilization, which affects the primary healing of the coracoclavicular ligaments by vertically stabilizing the clavicle and coracoid in their anatomical positions, and those that attempt to repair the superior acromioclavicular ligament complex, which controls both horizontal and rotational stabilization. The acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation clinical outcome will be achieved if you perform both procedures. It's difficult to stabilize the acromioclavicular joint in both vertical and horizontal planes, and most current techniques aren't always effective. In this Technical Note, we discuss an arthroscopic-assisted technique that reconstructs the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments under image intensifier guidance to achieve bidirectional (vertical and horizontal) and rotational stability.

Mid-Term Outcomes of Arthroscopically-Assisted Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction Using Tendon Allograft for High-Grade Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopically-assisted, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon allograft (AA-ACCR) for the treatment of Rockwood type III-V injuries at minimum 2-year follow-up and to perform subgroup analyses of clinical and radiographic outcomes for acute versus chronic and type III versus type IV-V injuries.

METHODS

In this retrospective study of prospectively collected data, patients who underwent primary AA-ACCR for the treatment of type III-V dislocations and had minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome scores (PROs) were collected, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Numeric Assessment Evaluation score, Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary, Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, and patient satisfaction. Preoperative and postoperative coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was obtained. PROs and CCD were reported for the total cohort and for the subgroups. Complication and revision rates were demonstrated.

RESULTS

In total, 102 patients (10 women, 92 men) with a mean age of 45.0 years (range, 18-73 years) were included. There were 13 complications (12.7%) resulting in revision surgery. After exclusion of revised patients, PROs were available for 69 (77.5%). At mean follow-up of 4.7 years (range, 2.0-12.8 years), all PROs improved significantly (P < .001). Median patient satisfaction was 9.0 (interquartile range, 8.0-10.0). Median preoperative to postoperative CCD decreased significantly (P < .001). Subgroup analyses revealed significant improvements in all PROs and CCD from preoperative to postoperative for both acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V dislocations (P < .05) with no significant differences in postoperative PROs and satisfaction between (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

AA-ACCR for high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries resulted in high postoperative PROs and patient satisfaction with significant improvements from before to after surgery in those who did not undergo revision surgery. Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed that acute and chronic, and type III and type IV-V injuries benefitted similarly from AA-ACCR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; therapeutic case series.

Nonanatomic and Suture-Based Coracoclavicular Joint Stabilization Techniques Provide Adequate Stability at a Lower Cost of Implants in Biomechanical Studies When Compared With Anatomic Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

To compare the stability and cost of the used implants in nonanatomic and anatomic acromioclavicular joint repair/reconstruction (ACCR) techniques tested in cadaveric shoulder biomechanical studies during the last decade.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Virtual Health Library databases. Studies evaluating 3-direction stability under 70-N loads and load-to-failure protocols with servohydraulic testing systems were included. A meta-analysis of the mean differences of anterior, posterior, and superior direction; relative stability value in 3 directions; superior direction load-to-failure; stability/cost index; and load-to-failure/cost index was performed using a continuous random-effects model and 95% confidence interval.

Results

Eighteen articles were included. Both non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and load-to-failure. ACCR techniques were biomechanically better in terms of anterior stability (P = .04) and relative stability value (mean difference 64.08%, P = .015). However, supraphysiological stability and failure loads were achieved with non-ACCR techniques at a lower cost of implants. Techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes had the greatest stability/cost index and load-to-failure/cost index among the included techniques (confidence interval 99%).

Conclusions

Non-ACCR and ACCR techniques exceeded the minimum acceptable threshold of stability and failure loads in controlled biomechanical testing. However, non-ACCR and techniques combining 2 clavicular tunnels separated by at least 10 mm, a mean of 2 sutures, and/or suture tapes provide supraphysiologic stability and failure loads at a lower cost of implants.

Clinical Relevance

Non-ACCR and suture-based techniques may provide more cost-effective and greater value treatment for acromioclavicular joint injury and could be considered in the surgical management of normal activity individuals and cost-sensitive populations.

Sagittal orientation of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction affects the stability of surgical repair

BACKGROUND

The variation in the anatomic relationship between the coracoid and the clavicle affects the biomechanical stability of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (CCLR).

METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction of 85 patients was analyzed. Anatomic landmarks were used to derive the coracoclavicular sagittal reconstruction angle (sRA). The lateral concave angle, which indicated the shape of the distal clavicle, and the offsets between the clavicle and coracoid were also measured. To investigate the biomechanical effects of the sRA on CCLR, 7 computed tomography scans with different sRAs were 3D printed. Two reconstructions, a single trans-coracoclavicular tunnel and a looped reconstruction technique, were performed sequentially. Models were cyclically loaded at 70 N in the anterior, posterior, and superior directions.

RESULTS

The mean sRA was 68° ± 9.3° (range, 47°-85°). The superoinferior offset between the clavicle and the coracoid and the lateral concave angle positively correlated with the sRA (r = 0.359 and 0.837, respectively; P ≤ .001), whereas the anteroposterior offset had a negative correlation (r = -0.925; P < .001). The sRA had a negative correlation with the anterior displacement of the clavicle (rho = -0.96; P < .001) and a positive correlation with the posterior displacement for both surgical techniques (rho = 1.0; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The anatomic orientation of the native coracoclavicular ligaments is highly variable in the sagittal plane. Low sagittal angles can reduce anterior stability, whereas high sagittal angles can reduce posterior stability of CCLR.

Vertical and Rotational Stiffness of Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study of 3 Different Techniques

PURPOSE

To compare the biomechanical stability of 3 different coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques under rotational and vertical loading using a cadaveric model.

METHODS

In total, 12 cadaveric shoulders were used for testing. The native state was first tested then followed by 3 different reconstruction configurations using suture tapes and cortical buttons: coracoid loop (CL), single-bundle (SB), and double-bundle (DB). Superior displacement was measured by cycling an inferiorly directed force of 70 N to the scapula. The rotational stiffness of the scapula was determined by cycling the scapula in rotational displacement control between 15° of internal and external rotation. The rotational stiffness of the clavicle was determined by rotating the clavicle around its long axis 20° anteriorly and 30° posteriorly in rotational displacement control. All measurements were captured over 10 cycles at a rate of 200 Hz.

RESULTS

Both the CL and SB techniques demonstrated significantly less internal scapular rotation stiffness. (intact: 19.70 ± 9.07 cNm/deg, CL: 3.70 ± 2.63 cNm/deg, SB:4.30 ± 2.66 cNm/deg, P <.001) External scapular rotation stiffness was significantly decreased in all techniques (intact: 17.70 ± 4.43 cNm/deg, CL: 3.30 ± 1.37 cNm/deg, SB: 4.50 ± 1.56 cNm/deg, DB: 4.67 ± 1.99 cNm/deg, P < .001). The CL and SB reconstructions were significantly less stiff with regards to posterior rotation of the clavicle (intact: 5.60 ± 1.80 cNm/deg, CL: 2.90 ± 1.10 cNm/deg, SB: 1.40 ± 0.65 cNm/deg, P < .001). Anterior rotation stiffness of the clavicle was significantly lower in all of the reconstructions (intact: 6.95 ± 1.90 cNm/deg, CL: 3.08 ± 0.84 cNm/deg, SB: 3.64 ± 0.93 cNm/deg, DB: 4.48 ± 1.21 cNm/deg, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

None of the described techniques provided equivalent rotational stability in all planes compared with the native state. DB reconstruction presented stiffness characteristics closest to the native state under cyclic loading during internal scapular and posterior clavicular rotation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Additional procedures such as tendon grafting or acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction may be required to control rotational stability.

Biomechanical evaluation of native acromioclavicular joint ligaments and two reconstruction techniques in the presence of the sternoclavicular joint: A cadaver study

BACKGROUND

Where is over 100 reconstruction techniques described for acromioclavicular (AC) joint reconstruction. Although, it is not clear whether the presence of the sternoclavicular (SC) joint influences the biomechanical properties of native AC ligaments and reconstruction techniques. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the biomechanical properties of native AC joint ligaments and two reconstruction techniques in cadavers with the SC joint still present.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We tested eight fresh-frozen cadaver hemithoraces for superior translation (70 N load) and translation increment after 1000 cycles (loading from 20 to 70 N) in a controlled laboratory study. There were three testing groups created: native ligaments, the single coracoclavicular loop (SCL) technique, and the two coracoclavicular loops (TCL) technique. Superior translation was measured after static loading. Translation increment was calculated as the difference between superior translation after cyclic and static loading.

RESULTS

Native AC ligaments showed significantly lower translation than the SCL ( p = 0.023) and TCL ( p = 0.046) groups. The SCL had a significantly lower translation increment than native AC ligaments ( p = 0.028). There was no significant difference between reconstruction techniques in terms of translation ( p = 0.865) and translation increment ( p = 0.113).

CONCLUSIONS

Native AC joint ligaments had better static properties than both reconstruction techniques and worse dynamic biomechanical properties than the SCL technique. The SCL technique appeared to be more secure than the TCL technique. The presence of the SC joint did not have an observable influence on test results.

Early complications of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction requiring reoperation

PURPOSE

Prior studies have reported high complication rates with acromioclavicular joint reconstruction (ACJR). However, many of these reports have suffered from small sample sizes and inclusion of older surgical techniques. The purpose of this study was to determine the rates of early complications requiring reoperation in patients treated with ACJR.

METHODS

From 2007 to 2011, patients who were treated with ACJR were identified using the PearlDiver database, a large insurance database in the USA. The following reoperations were then queried from this patient cohort: irrigation and debridement within 30 days of index surgery, manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) of the shoulder joint within 3 months of index surgery, and revision ACJR, distal clavicle excision, and removal of hardware within 6 months of index surgery.

RESULTS

In total, 2106 patients treated with ACJR were identified. The reoperation rates for irrigation and debridement, MUA, revision ACJR, distal clavicle excision, and removal of hardware were 2.6, 1.3, 4.2, 2.8, and 6.2 %, respectively. Patients ≥35 years of age and females more likely to undergo a reoperation after ACJR. Specifically, patients ≥35 years of age were more likely to undergo MUA and revision ACJR, while patients ≥50 years of age were more likely to undergo an irrigation and debridement. Females were more likely than males to undergo revision ACJR and distal clavicle excision.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients and females were more likely to experience postoperative complications requiring reoperations, including revision ACJR, distal clavicle excision, and irrigation and debridement. By analysing a large cohort of patients across multiple centres and providers, this study provides valuable insight into the recent complication profiles of ACJR, allowing surgeons to appropriately counsel patients on the risks of these procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate different stabilisation techniques for acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations, including direct AC repair, and to compare the properties of the stabilised and native joints.

METHODS

An established in vitro testing model for the AC joint was used to analyse joint stability after surgical reconstruction [double TightRope (DTR), DTR with AC repair (DTR + AC), single TR with AC repair (TR + AC), and PDS sling with AC repair (PDS + AC)]. Twenty-four human cadaveric shoulders were randomised by age into four testing groups. Joint stiffness was measured by applying an axial load during defined physiological ranges of motion. Similar tests were performed for the native joints, after dissecting the coracoclavicular and AC ligaments, and after surgical reconstruction. Cyclic loading was performed for 1000 cycles with 20-70 N and vertical load to failure determined after cyclic testing.

RESULTS

Axial stiffness for all TR groups was significantly higher than for the native joint (DTR 38.94 N/mm, p = 0.005; DTR + AC 37.79 N/mm, p = 0.015; TR + AC 45.61 N/mm, p < 0.001 vs. native 26.05 N/mm). The axial stiffness of the PDS + AC group was similar to that of the native joint group (21.4 N/mm, n.s.). AC repair did not significantly influence rotational stiffness. Load to failure was similar and >600 N in all groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of AC dislocations with one or two TRs leads to stable results with a higher stiffness than the native joints. For the PDS + AC group, axial stiffness was similar to the native situation, although there might be a risk of elongation. Direct AC repair showed no significantly increased stability in comparison with reconstructions without direct AC repair. Thus, a direct AC repair seems to be dispensable in clinical practice, while TRs or PDS cerclages appear to provide sufficiently stable results.

A Novel Surgical Technique for Fixation of Recurrent Acromioclavicular Dislocations: AC Dog Bone Technique in Combination with Autogenous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft

Various surgical techniques have been described for the fixation of acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations. However, recurrent dislocation is one of the main complications associated with the majority of these techniques. We report a case of postoperative AC joint redislocation. In order to overcome recurrent dislocation after revision surgery, a reconstruction of the conoid and trapezoid ligament with the use of a free tendon graft in combination with a FiberTape was provided within a novel surgical technique. After 12 months, the patient was very satisfied with the functional outcome. The patient achieved excellent results in the Constant (98 points), SPADI (0 points), and QuickDASH score (0 points). The described technique results in an anatomic reconstruction of the AC joint. The nonrigid nature of the intervention seems to restore the normal arthrokinematics by reconstructing the coracoclavicular ligaments with an autograft which is then protected by the AC Dog Bone artificial ligaments during the healing period. The arthroscopic approach to the AC joint with minimal exposure reduces the risks and complications of the intervention. This is the first case in literature that utilizes the artificial dog bone ligament securing the autograft in an anatomic AC reconstruction.

[Arthroscopically assisted techniques for treatment of acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries]

Acute and chronic acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is frequently encountered in the routine clinical practice. This injury can lead to significant impairment of shoulder girdle function. Therapy based on the severity of injury is recommended to re-establish correct shoulder function. The static radiographic Rockwood classification is used to define the degree of dislocation but the clinical aspects and functional x-ray imaging of horizontal AC joint instability should also be considered for selection of the appropriate procedure. Rockwood grades I and II injuries are treated non-operatively with early functional exercise. The approach for Rockwood grade III injuries should be individual and patient-specific, with non-surgical procedures for low functional requirement patients with a high risk for surgical interventions. For patients with high demands on shoulder function surgery is recommended. A detailed diagnostic assessment frequently reveals Rockwood grade III injuries to be type IV injuries. Rockwood types IV and V AC joint dislocations require surgery for sustained stability. Treatment of acute injuries is recommended within 1-3 weeks after trauma but there is no clear evidence of a cut-off for the presence of chronic injuries. Various surgical techniques have been described in the literature. This article presents an arthroscopically assisted technique that addresses both vertical and horizontal instability of the AC joint.

BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON OF THE CORACOCLAVICULAR SPACE FIXATION USING THREE DIFFERENT SUTURE TECHNIQUES

Coracoclavicular space fixation with suture loops is a well-known surgical technique for the treatment of dislocations. However, out of 100 different surgical treatments no single one has been established as a gold standard. The following research aims to improve the technique and focuses on a development of new fixation technique using composite sutures, which would withstand forces during ligament healing process. Three different fixation techniques (one loop and two separate suture loops and W-system) were tested on a custom built mechanical testing device. Applied load was continuously increased at a loading rate of 30[Formula: see text]N/min until the failure of the sutures. Ultimate tensile strength and suture elongation at failure were measured. The W-system had statistically significant higher load to failure and higher stiffness compared to one loop and two separate loops techniques. Biomechanical properties of a suture fixation technique can be improved by connecting them into one system to create particular arrangement of the sutures. The measurements can be easily repeated and this testing protocol can serve as a good starting point to standardize procedures of evaluation of different joint fixation techniques and to develop new ones.

Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation by coracoclavicular ligament augmentation

PURPOSE

Coracoclavicular (CC) ligament augmentation has been a method to treat acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation in recent years. The purpose of this paper is to describe our arthroscopic CC ligament augmentation technique in treating type III and V acute AC joint dislocations and to report the early clinical and radiological results.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2011, twelve patients suffering from acute type III or V AC joint dislocations were arthroscopically treated in our department, by CC ligament augmentation after AC joint reduction. The post-operative outcomes were assessed through physical examination, radiographic examination and the Constant-Murley Shoulder Score.

RESULTS

All patients post-operatively experienced anatomical reduction in their AC joint dislocation. No intraoperative complications occurred. At a mean follow-up at 24 months (ranging from 18 to 32 months), the mean Constant-Murley Shoulder Score significantly improved from 24.3 pre-operatively to 91.1 post-operatively. No neurovascular complications or secondary degenerative changes of the AC joint were detected in any of the patients. In one case, a second dislocation occurred 1 month post-operation because the patient had had another traumatic injury. This patient accepted a revision operation, but his AC joint eventually fixated into a subluxated position after his second injury.

CONCLUSION

Based on the resultant successful repair in all cases, the arthroscopic CC ligament augmentation method has thus far proven to be a safe and reliable technique for treatment of acute type III or V AC joint dislocation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The arthroscopic CC ligament augmentation with a flip button/polyethylene belt repair is an efficient method to treat acute type III and V AC joint dislocations which should be popularized.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Value of additional acromioclavicular cerclage for horizontal stability in complete acromioclavicular separation: a biomechanical study

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether isolated anatomical coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction with two suture-button devices provides equal horizontal acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stability compared to additional ACJ suture tape cerclage.

METHODS

A servohydraulic testing machine was used to assess horizontal ACJ translation in 12 fresh-frozen human shoulders during 5,000 cycles of dynamic anteroposterior directed loading (70 N). Horizontal ACJ stability was assessed for native specimen (n = 6) and compared to specimen with dissected AC ligaments but intact CC ligaments (n = 6). After complete AC/CC dissection, an anatomical CC reconstruction was performed with two suture-button devices (n = 6) and compared to the additional ACJ suture tape cerclage (n = 6).

RESULTS

Native specimen showed an mean horizontal amplitude of 10.8 mm [standard deviation (SD) 3.29]. After 5,000 cycles of horizontal loading (70 N), mean amplitude increased by 1.5 mm (SD 0.75, p = 0.005). Specimen with dissected AC ligaments started at an mean amplitude of 14.1 mm (SD 4.11), which was increased by 0.9 mm (SD 0.56, n.s.) after loading. Initially, amplitude of specimen with anatomical CC reconstruction was 13.2 mm (SD 2.75), which increased by 2.9 mm (SD 1.45, p = 0.001) after loading. The specimen with additional AC cerclage initially showed an amplitude of 10.6 mm (SD 2.35). After loading, translation was increased by 3.0 mm (SD 0.97, p = 0.001). There was no failure of any surgical reconstruction in the tests.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that only combined AC and CC reconstruction can adequately re-establish physiological horizontal ACJ stability. Therefore, it is likely that a combined surgical procedure with double suture-button devices and AC suture tape cerclage can adequately re-establish horizontal AC joint stability in case of an acute injury (≥type Rockwood IV and may allow superior clinical outcomes for patients, especially if early functional rehabilitation is intended).

Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair using coracoclavicular suspension devices in two different configurations

Background

The best treatment option for some acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations is controversial. For this reason, the aim of this study was to evaluate the vertical biomechanical behavior of two techniques for the anatomic repair of coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments after an AC injury.

Materials and methods

Eighteen human cadaveric shoulders in which repair using a coracoclavicular suspension device was initiated after injury to the acromioclavicular joint were included in the study. Three groups were formed; group I (n = 6): control; group II (n = 6): repair with a double tunnel in the clavicle and in the coracoid (with two CC suspension devices); group III (n = 6): repair in a “V” configuration with two tunnels in the clavicle and one in the coracoid (with one CC suspension device). The biomechanical study was performed with a universal testing machine (Electro Puls 3000, Instron, Boulder, MA, USA), with the clamping jaws set in a vertical position. The force required for acromioclavicular reconstruction system failure was analyzed for each cadaveric piece.

Results

Group I reached a maximum force to failure of 635.59 N (mean 444.0 N). The corresponding force was 939.37 N (mean 495.6 N) for group II and 533.11 N (mean 343.9 N) for group III. A comparison of the three groups did not find any significant difference despite the loss of resistance presented by group III.

Conclusion

Anatomic repair of coracoclavicular ligaments with a double system (double tunnel in the clavicle and in the coracoid) permits vertical translation that is more like that of the acromioclavicular joint. Acromioclavicular repair in a “V” configuration does not seem to be biomechanically sufficient.

Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and a biomechanical study of a triple endobutton technique

Operative intervention is recommended for complete acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation to restore AC stability, but the best operative technique is still controversial. Twelve fresh-frozen male cadaveric shoulders (average age, 62.8±7.8 years) were equally divided into endobutton versus the modified Weaver-Dunn groups. Each potted scapula and clavicle was fixed in a custom made jig to allow translation and load to failure testing using a Zwick BZ2.5/TS1S material testing machine (Zwick/Roell Co, Germany). A systematic review of 21 studies evaluating reconstructive methods for coracoclavicular or AC joints using a cadaveric model was also performed. From our biomechanical study, after ligament reconstruction, the triple endobutton technique demonstrated superior, anterior, and posterior displacements similar to that of the intact state (P>0.05). In the modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction group, however, there was significantly greater anterior (P<0.001) and posterior (P=0.003) translation after ligament reconstruction. In addition, there was no significant difference after reconstruction between failure load of the triple endobutton group and that of the intact state (686.88 vs 684.9 N, P>0.05), whereas the failure load after the modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction was decreased compared with the intact state (171.64 vs 640.86 N, P<0.001). From our systematic review of 21 studies, which involved comparison of the modified Weaver-Dunn technique with other methods, the majority showed that the modified Weaver-Dunn procedure had significantly (P<.05) greater laxity than other methods including the endobutton technique. The triple endobutton reconstruction proved superior to the modified Weaver-Dunn technique in restoration of AC joint stability and strength. Triple endobutton reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligament is superior to the modified Weaver-Dunn reconstruction in controlling both superior and anteroposterior displacements with a failure load that approximates the intact ligament.

Evaluation of the coracoclavicular reconstruction using LARS artificial ligament in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

PURPOSE

The most appropriate procedure for surgical treatment of severe acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation was still not clear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction with ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) artificial ligaments for the treatment of acute complete AC joint dislocation.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients (16 male and 8 female, ages ranged from 21 to 45) with acute complete AC joint dislocations were treated with CC reconstruction using LARS artificial ligaments. All these dislocations were unstable injuries. Clinical evaluation was used by the Constant scores and VAS. The radiographic evaluation consisted of Zanca radiographs for bilateral AC joint and axillary radiographs for the injured shoulder.

RESULTS

All patients had follow-up times of 36 months (range 6-60). The Constant scores rose from 62.3 ± 6.9 preoperatively to 94.5 ± 9.3 at final evaluation (P < 0.05). Preoperative VAS scores were 5.1 ± 1.7, and the VAS scores at the last review were 0.7 ± 1.4 (P < 0.05). Follow-up radiographs showed anatomical reduction in 20 patients and slight loss of reduction in 4 patients. Calcification of CC ligament in 4 patients, degenerative change around the AC joint in 2 patient and clavicular osteolysis around screws in one patient were found.

CONCLUSIONS

LARS artificial ligament for reconstruction of CC can provide immediate stability and allow early shoulder mobilization with good functional results and few complications. This procedure was an effective and safe method to treat grade III and more AC joint dislocations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to introduce a novel surgical technique for simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft and to compare its biomechanical characteristics to those of a coracoid cerclage reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

METHODS

Six matched pairs of human acromioclavicular joints with an average age of 54.8 ± 7.8 years were used. One shoulder from each pair received the single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction; the contralateral shoulder received the coracoid cerclage reconstruction. Bovine extensor tendon was used for both techniques. The single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction technique provided anatomic restoration of the two coracoclavicular ligaments and the superior and inferior acromioclavicular ligaments simultaneously using one coracoid hole, one acromion hole, and two clavicular holes with interference screws. Anterior-posterior and superior-inferior translations were quantified for all specimens before and after reconstruction, followed by load to failure testing.

RESULTS

Following coracoid cerclage reconstruction, total anterior-posterior translation was significantly greater than intact (10.0 ± 5.7 mm; p = 0.008). Following single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction, there was no significant difference in anterior-posterior translation compared to intact (-1.6 ± 2.2 mm; n.s.). The coracoid cerclage technique demonstrated significantly greater anterior-posterior translation than the single tendon acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular technique (p = 0.007). Both techniques restored superior-inferior translation to the intact condition (n.s.). Ultimate load, deformation at ultimate load, and energy absorbed at ultimate load were significantly greater after acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction than after coracoid cerclage reconstruction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This novel single tendon anatomic acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction provided greater stability and stronger load to failure characteristics than the isolated coracoid cerclage reconstruction. A simultaneous acromioclavicular-coracoclavicular reconstruction technique using a single free tendon graft provided anatomic reconstruction of the conoid, trapezoid, and superior and inferior acromioclavicular ligaments and may reduce postoperative subluxation.

Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the disrupted acromioclavicular (AC) joint has historically resulted in high complication rates. As a result, there has been a move toward anatomic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament fixation and reconstruction, owing to its numerous biomechanical advantages and perceived clinical advantages.

PURPOSE

To report and analyze the unique complications associated with these anatomic CC ligament procedures using either cortical fixation buttons (CFBs) or tendon grafts (TGs) and to evaluate the effect that these complications have on patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

From January 2006 until May 2011, a total of 59 primary anatomic CC ligament procedures were performed using either CFBs or TGs. Demographic, surgical, subjective (including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [QuickDASH], Short Form-12 [SF-12], and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE] scores), and radiographic data along with surgical complications were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Construct survivorship, defined as the maintenance of reduction of the AC joint, was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method at 12- and 24-month intervals.

RESULTS

Surgical treatment for AC joint dislocations was performed in 3 women (4 shoulders) and 52 men (55 shoulders) with a mean age of 43.6 years (range, 18-71 years); 13 shoulders (22.0%) underwent fixation using the CFB technique, and 46 shoulders (78.0%) underwent reconstruction using the TG technique. The overall complication rate was 27.1% (16/59) in this study. There were 3 complications (23.1%) in the CFB group, including 1 coracoid fracture and 2 cases of hardware failure resulting in a loss of reduction. There were 13 complications (28.2%) in the TG group, including 4 graft ruptures, 2 clavicle fractures, 1 case of hardware failure, 1 hypertrophic distal clavicle, 2 cases of hardware pain, 1 suture granuloma, 1 case of adhesive capsulitis, and 1 case of axillary neuropathy. Twelve- and 24-month construct survivorship was calculated to be 86.2% and 83.2%, respectively. Of the 43 shoulders that did not have a complication, mean ASES scores significantly improved from 57.5 (range, 0-97) to 91 (range, 63-100) (P < .001), and mean SF-12 physical component summary scores significantly improved from 45 (range, 25-58) to 56 (range, 43-65.8) (P < .001) after a mean 2.4-year follow-up (range, 1.0-5.7 years). There were no significant differences in outcomes between those that did and did not experience a complication, with the exception that those with complications had significantly decreased median patient satisfaction compared with those without complications (3.5 vs 9, respectively; P = .049).

CONCLUSION

Anatomic procedures to treat disrupted CC ligaments using either CFBs or TGs resulted in an overall complication rate of 27.1% (16/59). Construct survivorship was calculated to be 86.2% at 12 months and 83.2% at 24 months. Good to excellent outcomes could only be reported in those patients who did not have a complication.

Acromioclavicular joint separations

Acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations are common injuries of the shoulder girdle, especially in the young and active population. Typically the mechanism of this injury is a direct force against the lateral aspect of the adducted shoulder, the magnitude of which affects injury severity. While low-grade injuries are frequently managed successfully using non-surgical measures, high-grade injuries frequently warrant surgical intervention to minimize pain and maximize shoulder function. Factors such as duration of injury and activity level should also be taken into account in an effort to individualize each patient's treatment. A number of surgical techniques have been introduced to manage symptomatic, high-grade injuries. The purpose of this article is to review the important anatomy, biomechanical background, and clinical management of this entity.