An analysis of normative data on the knee rotatory profile and the usefulness of the Rotatometer, a new instrument for measuring tibiofemoral rotation: the reliability of the knee Rotatometer

Comparison of a simplified skin pointer device compared with a skeletal marker for knee rotation laxity: A cadaveric study using a rotation-meter

AIM

To compare the measurements of knee rotation laxity by non-invasive skin pointer with a knee rotation jig in cadaveric knees against a skeletally mounted marker.

METHODS

Six pairs of cadaveric legs were mounted on a knee rotation jig. One Kirscher wire was driven into the tibial tubercle as a bone marker and a skin pointer was attached. Rotational forces of 3, 6 and 9 nm applied at 0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion were analysed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and paired t-test.

RESULTS

Total rotation recorded with the skin pointer significantly correlated with the bone marker at 3 nm at 0° (skin pointer 23.9 ± 26.0° vs bone marker 16.3 ± 17.3°, r = 0.92; P = 0.0), 30° (41.7 ± 15.5° vs 33.1 ± 14.7°, r = 0.63; P = 0.037), 45° (49.0 ± 17.0° vs 40.3 ± 11.2°, r = 0.81; P = 0.002), 60° (45.7 ± 17.5° vs 34.7 ± 9.5°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 90° (29.2 ± 10.9° vs 21.2 ± 6.8°, r = 0.69; P = 0.019) of knee flexion and 6 nm at 0° (51.1 ± 37.7° vs 38.6 ± 30.1°, r = 0.90; P = 0.0), 30° (64.6 ± 21.6° vs 54.3 ± 15.1°, r = 0.73; P = 0.011), 45° (67.7 ± 20.6° vs 55.5 ± 9.5°, r = 0.65; P = 0.029), 60° (62.9 ± 22.4° vs 45.8 ± 13.1°, r = 0.65; P = 0.031) and 90° (43.6 ± 17.6° vs 31.0 ± 6.3°, r = 0.62; P = 0.043) of knee flexion and at 9 nm at 0° (69.7 ± 40.0° vs 55.6 ± 30.6°, r = 0.86; P = 0.001) and 60° (74.5 ± 27.6° vs 57.1 ± 11.5°, r = 0.77; P = 0.006). No statistically significant correlation with 9 nm at 30° (79.2 ± 25.1° vs 66.9 ± 15.4°, r = 0.59; P = 0.055), 45° (80.7 ± 24.7° vs 65.5 ± 11.2°, r = 0.51; P = 0.11) and 90° (54.7 ± 21.1° vs 39.4 ± 8.2°, r = 0.55; P = 0.079). We recognize that 9 nm of torque may be not tolerated in vivo due to pain. Knee rotation was at its maximum at 45° of knee flexion and increased with increasing torque.

CONCLUSION

The skin pointer and knee rotation jig can be a reliable and simple means of quantifying knee rotational laxity with future clinical application.

Male-Female Differences in Knee Laxity and Stiffness: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that over 70% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries occur in noncontact situations and that females are at 2 to 8 times greater risk of ACL injury than males. Increased joint laxity and reduced knee stiffness in female knees have been suggested as possible explanations for the higher ACL injury rates in females.

HYPOTHESIS

Compared with male knees, female knees will demonstrate increased laxity and reduced stiffness along the anterior-posterior (AP), internal-external (IE), and varus-valgus (VV) directions.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Forty-seven fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were tested (22 male and 25 female) by use of a robotic system. Mean ages were 34.6 years (range, 19-45 years) for males and 28.4 years (range, 16-42 years) for females. Joint laxity and stiffness were measured from force-vs-displacement or torque-vs-rotation curves recorded for 3 modes of testing: ± 134 N AP force, ± 5 N · m IE torque, and ± 10 N · m VV moment.

RESULTS

Compared with male knees, female knees had greater internal laxity from 0° to 50° flexion (P < .01; maximum difference of 8.3° at 50° of flexion) and greater valgus laxity from 0° to 50° of flexion (P < .05; maximum difference of 1.6° at 50° of flexion). However, female knees exhibited greater anterior laxity only at 50° of flexion (P < .03; difference of 1.3 mm). No significant male-female differences in anterior or posterior stiffness were found. Male knees had 42% greater internal stiffness from 0° to 30° of flexion (P < .03), 35% greater valgus stiffness at 10° of flexion (P < .03), and 19% greater varus stiffness at 50° of flexion (P < .03).

CONCLUSION

Female knees demonstrated significantly increased laxity and reduced stiffness compared with males. This finding was not uniform but was dependent on the direction tested and the knee flexion angle.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding the risk factors for noncontact ACL injury is important for injury prevention. In combination with other female-specific risk factors, increased knee laxity may be a contributing factor associated with the higher rate of female ACL injuries.