Differences in component and limb alignment between computer-assisted and conventional surgery total knee arthroplasty

Clinical evaluation of the first semi-active total knee arthroplasty assisting robot made in China: a retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The precision of overall alignment and knee morphotype after robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty has been fully confirmed. This study aims to conduct a clinical evaluation of the first China-made semi-active total knee arthroplasty assisting robot.

METHODS

After a 1 : 2 propensity score matching, that is, a matched cohort study, patients were matched to the robot group (52 cases) and the conventional group (104 cases). The robot group received osteotomy according to preoperative planning, while the conventional group adopted preoperative planning based on the full-length radiograph and received conventional osteotomy. Perioperative clinical indicators, such as operation time, tourniquet time, hospitalization days, intraoperative bleeding, and hemoglobin level of the two groups were recorded; radiological indicators of postoperative prosthesis position, including hip-knee-ankle angle, frontal femoral component angle, frontal tibial component angle, lateral femoral component angle, and lateral tibial component angle were also recorded; deviations and outliers of the radiological indicators were calculated.

RESULTS

Compared with the conventional group, the operation time and tourniquet time of the robot group were longer, and the postoperative hemoglobin level decreased less, the differences were statistically significant; the lateral tibial component angle of the conventional group was 80.9°±3.6°, which was smaller than 86.7 °±2.3° of the robot group, the difference was statistically significant ( P <0.001); except for lateral femoral component angle, the absolute deviations of the radiological indicators in the robot group were significantly smaller than that in the conventional group ( P ≤0.001); the outliers of the radiological indicators in the robot group were significantly smaller than that in the conventional group with a statistical difference ( P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with the conventional group, the operation time of the robot group was relatively longer, but the perioperation blood loss was less. The robot group could better control the posterior inclination of the tibial prosthesis, and the absolute deviations and outliers of the prosthesis position were relatively smaller. There was no difference in short-term clinical score between the two groups.

The Usefulness of a Simplified Navigation-Based Instrumentation for a Novice Surgeon in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

A novel simplified navigation-based instrumentation system has been developed. It simplifies the existing navigation system and facilitates convenient bone cutting by positioning the tracker on an existing cutting block without additional pin fixation. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of this newly developed simplified navigation-based instrumentation system in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed by a novice surgeon with those of conventional surgical techniques.

Methods

From January 2020 to July 2020, 67 knees that underwent primary TKA using the ExactechGPS TKA Plus (group A) were compared to 68 knees that underwent primary TKA using a conventional technique (group B). All patients had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The operative details such as tourniquet time were investigated. Postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and component position angles in the coronal and sagittal planes (α, β, γ, and δ angles) were evaluated. The outlier rates were compared between the groups as those lying outside ± 3°. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for pain and function, and range of motion were compared.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in average tourniquet time between the groups (74.3 vs. 70.3 minutes, p = 0.061). Outlier rates for HKA angle (7.5% vs. 23.5%, p = 0.010) and β angle (1.5% vs. 22.1%, p < 0.001) in group A were significantly lower than those in group B. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the groups.

Conclusions

Primary TKA performed by a novice surgeon using a simplified navigation-based instrumentation system did not significantly increase the operation time, and more accurate lower extremity mechanical alignment and tibial component alignment in the coronal plane could be obtained.

Gap balanced adjusted mechanical alignment versus measured resection mechanical alignment: a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Alignment goals in total knee replacement (TKR) is a topical subject. This study compares the short-term functional outcomes and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of two philosophies for knee arthroplasty alignment: measured resection (MR) and an individualised alignment philosophy, with the tibia mechanically aligned and an instrumented gap balancer (GB) to align the femur in both flexion and extension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

94 knees were enrolled in this randomised controlled trial. The surgical protocol used a MR technique for mechanical alignment or a GB technique for individualised alignment. Primary outcome was quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes included validated functional tests and PROMs as well as patient satisfaction. Outcomes were assessed pre-operatively, at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

At 12-month follow-up, there was no significant difference in the change from baseline mean quadriceps peak torque between the two groups (p = 0.988). Significant improvement in the change in range of motion (ROM) in the GB group compared to the MR group at 3 months (13° vs 6° p = 0.028) but this improvement was not significant at 1 year (20° vs 17° p = 0.21). The functional test of balance showed statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks (p = 0.03) in the GB group but this difference was not maintained. PROMs favoured the GB group, with the KOOS pain scoring statistically better (p ≤ 0.05) at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualised alignment philosophy utilising a GB technique did not demonstrate an improvement in the primary outcome measure quadriceps peak torque. Improvement was seen in the GB group in PROM pain scores that was significant, both statistically and clinically, out to at least 1 year. Gains that were seen in functional assessment with GB, although significant at some time points, were no longer significant at 1 year and no difference was seen in quads strength. Compared to a MR technique, the individualised GB technique appears to confer some improvement in pain, ROM and some functional tests following TKR in the short-term.

Correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between component alignment and short-term clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

50 TKA patients from a regional hospital were enrolled in the study. The following component alignments were measured from radiological data acquired within 1 week after surgery: hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), medial distal femoral angle (MDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), femoral flexion-extension angle (FEA), tibial slope angle (TSA), femoral rotational angle (FRA) and tibial rotational angle (TRA). The Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring system was used to assess clinical outcomes after 1 year, with patients being divided into three groups (excellent, good and not good) according to the HSS scores. Difference analysis and linear correlation analysis were used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The results showed significant differences in MDFA (p = 0.050) and FEA (p = 0.001) among the three patient groups. It was also found that the total HSS had only a moderate correlation with FEA (r = 0.572, p < 0.001), but FEA had a positive linear correlation with pain scores (r = 0.347, p = 0.013), function scores (r = 0.535, p = 0.000), ROM scores (r = 0.368, p = 0.009), muscle scores (r = 0.354, p = 0.012) and stability scores (r = 0.312, p = 0.028). A larger MDFA was associated with lower FE deformity scores (r = -0.289, p = 0.042) and the TSA had a positive influence on the ROM (r = 0.436, p = 0.002). Also, changes in FRA produced a consequent change in the FE deformity score (r = 0.312, p = 0.027), and the muscle strength scores increased as TRA increased (r = 0.402, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The results show that the FEA plays a significant role in clinical outcomes after TKA. Surgical techniques and tools may need to be improved to accurately adjust the FEA to improve joint functionality and patient satisfaction.

Femoral Valgus Correction Angle for the Intramedullary Alignment Rod Is Strongly Associated with Femoral Lateral Bowing in Japanese Patients with Varus Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background. This study aimed to investigate factors, such as differences in femoral shape, that could affect the femoral valgus correction angle (VCA) for the intramedullary alignment rod (IM rod) by using a three-dimensional (3D) measurement system in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods. A total of 305 knees in 233 Japanese patients with varus knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA by using Jig Engaged 3D Pre-Operative Planning Software for the TKA operation support system was examined. We retrospectively analysed factors, such as the shape of the proximal, middle, and distal femur in the coronal plane, all of which could affect the VCA for the IM rod, by multiple linear regression analyses. Results. The VCA for the IM rod was 5.9° ± 1.6° (range: 1.7° to 10.7°), and the femoral lateral bowing angle (FBA) was 3.5° ± 3.2°. Major factors independently associated with the VCA for the IM rod were the FBA (β: 0.75), femoral offset (β: 0.38), and the medial angle between the mechanical femoral axis and the line that connects the distal margins of the medial and lateral femoral condyles (β: −0.16). The model was created by stepwise multiple linear regression (F = 266.6, $p<0.001$ , and estimated effect size = 4.4) explained 85% of the variance in the VCA for the IM rod (R2 = 0.85). Conclusions. The VCA for the IM rod was most strongly associated with femoral lateral bowing in patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing TKA. Our findings suggest that preoperatively measuring the VCA for the IM rod in patients with femoral lateral bowing by using a 3D measurement system could be useful for accurate coronal alignment of the femoral component in TKA.

Navigated and Robot-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Outcome Differences Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference?

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), computer-assisted navigation (N-TKA) and robotic-assisted methods (RA-TKA) are intended to increase precision of mechanical and component alignment. However, the clinical significance of published patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) differences in comparison to conventional TKA (C-TKA) is unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all studies reporting perioperative PROMs for either primary N-TKA or RA-TKA with a C-TKA comparison cohort with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Relative improvements in PROMs for the two cohorts were compared to published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values.

RESULTS

After systematic review, 21 studies (N = 3,214) reporting on N-TKA and eight studies (N = 1,529) reporting on RA-TKA met inclusion criteria. Eighteen of 20 studies (90%) reported improved radiographic outcomes with N-TKA relative to C-TKA; five of five studies reported improved radiographic outcomes with RA-TKA relative to C-TKA. Five of 21 studies (24%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in clinical PROMs for N-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas only two (10%) achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. One of 8 studies (13%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in PROMs for RA-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas none achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. No studies reported a significant difference in revision rates.

CONCLUSION

While most studies comparing RA-TKA and N-TKA with C-TKA demonstrate improved radiographic alignment outcomes, a minority of studies reported PROM differences that achieve clinical significance. Future studies should report data and be interpreted in the context of clinical significance to establish patient and surgeon expectations for emerging technologies.

The accuracy of an extramedullary femoral cutting system in total knee arthroplasty in patients with severe coronal femoral bowing: a radiographic study

BACKGROUND

Intramedullary (IM) femoral alignment instrument is imprecise for the coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with severe lateral bowing of the femur, while the extramedullary (EM) alignment system does not depend on the structure of the femoral medullary cavity. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the accuracy of postoperative limb alignment with the two femoral alignment techniques for patients with severe coronal femoral bowing.

METHODS

From January 2017 to December 2019, patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis and coronal femoral bowing angle (cFBA) ≥ 5° who underwent total knee arthroplasty TKA at our institution were enrolled in the study. The postoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) alignment, femoral and tibial component alignment between the IM group and the EM group were compared on 5° ≤ cFBA < 10° and cFBA ≥ 10°.

RESULTS

In patients with 5° ≤ cFBA < 10°, no significant differences were observed in the EM group and IM group, including preoperative and postoperative parameters. However, when analyzing the patients with cFBA ≥ 10°, we found a significant difference in postoperative HKA (4.51° in the IM group vs. 2.23°in the EM group, p < 0.001), femoral component alignment angle (86.84° in the IM group vs. 88.46° in the EM group, p = 0.001) and tibial component alignment angle (88.69° in the IM group vs. 89.81° in the EM group, p = 0.003) between the two groups. Compared to the EM group, the IM group presents a higher rate of outliers for the postoperative HKA and femoral components.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that severe lateral bowing of the femur has an important influence on the postoperative alignment with the IM femoral cutting system. In this case, the application of EM cutting system in TKA will perform accurate distal femoral resection and optimize the alignment of lower limb and the femoral component.

Comparative Study of Pinless Navigation System versus Conventional Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Backgroud

Optimal placement of the components and achieving a neutral mechanical axis are the main goals of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Different computerised navigation systems are presently used for these purposes. This aim of this study was to compare the pinless navigation (PNA) TKA performed using iAssist with the conventional instrumented (CIN) TKA in terms of functional and radiological outcomes.

Methods

A total of 100 knees operated for TKA by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively for a period of 2 years. Weight-bearing postoperative radiographs of the knees along with scanograms of the lower limbs were used for measurements of component positioning, mechanical axis alignment, and number of outliers. Oxford knee scoring was used for functional analysis.

Results

No statistically significant difference was seen in the mean mechanical axis alignment (hip-knee-ankle angle), coronal alignment (α and β angles) and sagittal alignment (γ and δ angles) of the femoral and tibial components between the two groups. Though the percentage of outliers for mechanical axis alignment was lower in the PNA-TKA group than in the CIN-TKA group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.73). The number of outliers for the femoral and tibial component positioning in coronal and sagittal planes was not statistically significantly different between the two groups. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the two groups with respect to the Oxford Knee Score. The mean surgical time was greater in the PNA-TKA group by 11 minutes, which was statistically significantly longer (p = 0.018). Complications were seen in 6.89% of the cases in the CIN-TKA group, while none in the PNA-TKA group.

Conclusions

The accurate mechanical axis alignment and component positioning can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation, so the use of PNA system, which adds to the surgical cost, is questionable. Also, equally good short-term functional outcome can be achieved with the conventional instrumentation. The surgeon must be accustomed with the instrumentation of the PNA system, or it adds to the surgical time.

Total knee arthroplasty in femoral bowing: does patient specific instrumentation have something to add? A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) proponents have suggested the benefits of improved component alignment and reduced outliers. In this randomized controlled trial, we attempted to assess the advantage of using PSI over conventional intermedullary (IM) guides for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with bilateral severe femoral bowing (> 5°). A parallel trial design was used with 1:1 allocation. We hypothesize that PSI would support more accurate alignment of components and the lower-limb axis during TKA with severe femoral bowing in comparison with conventional IM guides.

METHODS

Among 336 patients undergoing bilateral TKAs due to knee osteoarthritis, 29 patients with bilateral lateral femoral bowing of more than 5° were included in this study. Every patient was assigned randomly to PSI on one side and to conventional instrumentation lateralization of the entry point of the femoral IM guide was applied on the other with a goal of neutral mechanical alignment. The assessment of coronal alignment was completed by measuring the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle on preoperative and postoperative long film standing radiographs. Coronal and sagittal orientations of femoral and tibial components were assessed on weight-bearing radiographs. The rotational alignment of the femoral component was evaluated using computed tomography.

RESULTS

The postoperative mean ± standard deviation (SD) HKA angle was varus 4.0° (± 2.7°) for conventional technique and varus 4.1° (± 3.1°) for PSI, with no differences between the two groups (p = 0.459). The component orientation showed no significant differences except with respect to the sagittal alignment of the femoral component (p = 0.001), with a PSI mean ± SD flexion of 5.8° (± 3.7°) and a conventional method mean ± SD flexion of 3.2° (± 2.5°), due to the intentional 3° flexion incorporated in the sagittal plane to prevent femoral notching in PSI planning. Computed tomography assessment for rotational alignment of the femoral components showed no difference between the two groups concerning the transepicondylar axis (p = 0.485) with a PSI mean ± SD external rotation of 1.5° (± 1.3°) and conventional mean ± SD external rotation of 1.5° (± 1.6°).

CONCLUSION

PSI showed no advantage over lateralization of the femoral entry for IM guidance.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on US national library of medicine ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02993016 ) on December 12^th 2016.

Clinical value of CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional instruments in primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis

Purpose

To evaluate the operation and early clinical effect in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) about the novel combination of CT-based patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) preoperative design and conventional osteotomy instruments, compared with the conventional method.

Methods

After a 1:1 propensity score-matching (PSM), patients were matched to the novel technique group and the conventional group, 109 cases in each group. The conventional group adopted a preoperative design based on a full-length radiograph (FLX) and received TKA with conventional osteotomy instruments. The novel technique group used a CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional osteotomy instruments; during the surgery, the femoral entry point, femoral valgus osteotomy angle, the fix point of tibial plateau extramedullary guide pin, and the position of tibial extramedullary positioning rod were accurately selected according to the preoperative 3D design to ensure accurate intraoperative implementation. The lower limb alignment, component position, operation time, tourniquet time, hospital stay, blood loss volume, incidence of postoperative complications, visual analog scale (Vas) score, and New Knee Society Score System (NEW-KSS) at 1 day before operation and 1, 6, and 12 months after operation were recorded and compared.

Results

The novel technique group was significantly better than the conventional group in controlling lateral tibial component angle (LTC) (P < 0.001), and the novel technique group had lower percentages of hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) outliers (P < 0.001) and overcorrection (P = 0.003). The operation time, tourniquet time, and hospital stay of the novel technique group was shorter (P < 0.05). In 1 month after the operation, the novel technique group achieved a significantly better VAS score (P < 0.05), but a similar NEW-KSS score (P > 0.05) when compared with the conventional group. But in 6 and 12 months after surgery, no statistical differences were seen in the above two scores (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The novel technique of CT-based patient-specific 3D preoperative design combined with conventional instruments can improve the accuracy of osteotomy in primary total knee arthroplasty, with benefits of significantly reducing pain and rapid recovery during the early postoperative period, but having no obvious effect on outcome after a 1-year follow-up.

Limb and component alignment after total knee arthroplasty comparing 28 consecutive iAssist and 28 conventional TKAs: A prospective study

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess limb and component alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on long leg X-rays and to compare the use of iAssist, an accelerometric based computer-assisted device (CAD), with conventional jigs.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 56 consecutive patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA by a single surgeon into this study. In the first 28 patients iAssist navigation system was utilized and in the following 28 conventional jigs were used. The groups were comparable with regard to age, sex distribution, body mass index and preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle. Our aim was to restore neutral coronal alignment and a five degree tibial slope.

RESULTS

The mean postoperative mechanical axis was 179.4° in the CAD group and 180.1° in the conventional group (P = 0.187). There were five TKAs deviating more than three degrees from neutral (18.5%) in the conventional group and none in the CAD group (P = 0.051). The mean femoral mechanical-condyles-angle was significantly closer (P < 0.001) to our target of 90° in the conventional group but contained more outliers (P = 0.67). The sagittal tibial slope was closer (P = 0.047) to our target of 85° in CAD-navigated TKAs with fewer outliers (P < 0.0001). The Oxford Knee Score showed comparable (P = 0.271) and good clinical outcome in both groups. The mean operation time was significantly longer in the CAD group (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the use of iAssist accelerometric CAD facilitates comparable good leg alignment after TKA in the frontal plane and more accurate tibial slope with fewer outliers in the sagittal plane compared with a conventional technique. Our operation time was longer with CAD.

Accuracy of tibial positioning in the frontal plane: a prospective study comparing conventional and innovative techniques in total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Coronal alignment of the tibial component determines functional outcome and survival in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Innovative techniques for tibial instrumentation have been developed to improve accuracy and reduce the rate of outliers.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 300 patients were allocated to four different groups using a randomization process (two innovative and two conventional) techniques of tibial instrumentation (conventional: extramedullary, intramedullary; innovative: navigation and patient-specific instrumentation (PSI); n = 75 for each group). The aims were to reconstruct the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) to 90° and the mechanical tibio-femoral axis (mTFA) to 0°. Both angles were evaluated and compared between all groups three months after the surgery. Patients who presented with a postoperative mTFA > 3° were classified as outliers.

RESULTS

The navigation and intramedullary technique both demonstrated that they were significantly more precise in reconstructing a neutral mTFA and MPTA compared to the other two techniques. The odd's ratio (OR) for producing outliers was highest for the PSI method (PSI OR = 5.5, p < 0.05; extramedullary positioning OR = 3.7, p > 0.05; intramedullary positioning OR = 1.7, p > 0.05; navigation OR = 0.04, p < 0.05). We could only observe significant differences between pre- and postoperative MPTA in the navigation and intramedullary group. The MPTA showed a significant negative correlation with the mTFA in all groups preoperatively and in the extramedullary, intramedullary and PSI postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The navigation and intramedullary instrumentation provided the precise positioning of the tibial component. Outliers were most common within the PSI and extramedullary technique. Optimal alignment is dependent on the technique of tibial instrumentation and tibial component positioning determines the accuracy in TKA since mTFA correlated with MPTA pre- and postoperatively.

Comparison of computer-assisted navigation and conventional instrumentation for bilateral total knee arthroplasty: The outcomes at mid-term follow-up

It remains unclear if computer-assisted surgery (CAS) technique actually improves the clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and decreases the failure rate. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the functional results of TKA in a series of patients who underwent staged bilateral TKAs with CAS TKA in 1 knee and conventional TKA in the contralateral knee.From January 1997 to December 2010, we collected 60 patients who were randomly assigned to receive CAS TKA in 1 limb and conventional TKA in the other. The Brainlab Vector Vision navigation system was used for CAS TKA, and the DePuy press-fit condylar sigma guide system was used for conventional TKA. Patients were assessed before surgery, 3 months and 1 year after surgery, and annually thereafter. IKS criteria were used for radiographic evaluation. Clinical and functional evaluation using the scoring system of hospital for special surgery (HSS), international knee society (IKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), and short form-36 (SF-36) were obtained on each knee, before surgery, and at each follow-up visit. Pertinent statistical methods were adopted for data analysis.Fifty-six patients were available for analysis and 44 of the patients were female. The mean duration of follow-up was 8.1 years. Less blood loss (P = .007) and longer operation time were noted for CAS TKAs when compared with conventional TKAs. Precise alignment and fewer outliers of the lower limb and prosthetic component positions were found for CAS TKAs (P < .001). There were no differences between the 2 groups before surgery and at the latest follow-up with regard to scores for HSS, IKS, WOMAC, and SF-36 as well as active range of motion.The clinical outcomes of CAS TKAs at the 8-year follow-up were similar to those of conventional TKAs despite the better radiographic alignment and fewer outliers achieved with navigation assistance.

Deviation of femoral intramedullary alignment rod influences coronal and sagittal alignment during total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

An intramedullary (IM) rod is used to resect the distal femur vertically to the femoral mechanical axis in the coronal plane in many cases of total knee arthroplasties (TKA). The valgus angle between the mechanical axis and the anatomical axis of the distal femur is estimated preoperatively. It is known the deviation of the IM rod in the femoral canal could influence the femoral component alignment. However, there is no published data regarding how many degrees of deviation to make with the IM rod. The purpose of this study is to measure each deviation of the IM rod using three-dimensional (3D) computer simulations.

METHODS

Preoperative CT scans on 30 knees undergoing TKA were studied. The line connecting central points at 10 and 20 cm proximal from the intercondylar notch was defined as the anatomical axis and the point at which the anatomical axis intersects the surface of the distal femur was considered as the entry point of the IM rod. The medio-lateral (ML) and antero-posterior (AP) deviations between the anatomical axis and the IM rod were measured.

RESULTS

The ML and AP deviations were 0.8 and 1.1° on average. The IM rod was deviated medio-laterally more than 1.0° in three knees (10%).

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should note the ML difference of the resection thickness of the distal femur for coronal alignment. If the ML difference varies greatly from the preoperative planning, they need to adjust at most 1.0° of valgus angle to achieve the appropriate coronal alignment. Level of evidence III, Therapeutic.

Bone-femoral component interface gap after sagittal mechanical axis alignment is filled with new bone after cementless total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively evaluated the fate of mismatch between an uncemented femoral component and each femoral cut surface (i.e., wedge-shaped gap) relative to sagittal mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Primary TKA was performed on 99 consecutive knees. The femoral components were aligned to the sagittal mechanical axis with CT-based navigation. All patients were assessed with postoperative true lateral radiographs. Bone-side surfaces of the uncemented femoral component were divided into five zones: anterior flange, anterior chamfer, posterior chamfer, posterior part, and distal part, which were defined as zones 1 to 5, respectively. Bone filling of wedge-shaped gaps in each zone was evaluated after 1 year.

RESULTS

Femoral anterior notching did not occur. However, wedge-shaped gaps were observed in at least one zone in 23 of 99 knees (23%), most frequently in zone 5 (18%). There were 9 and 7 gaps in zones 1 and 2, respectively. The femoral component showed malpositioning of approximately 3° of flexion in cases with wedge-shaped gaps in zones 2 and/or 5. After one year, 67% (6/9) of zone 1, 100% (7/7) of zone 2, and 94% (17/18) of zone 5 wedge-shaped gaps were filled in with new bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral alignment relative to sagittal mechanical axis caused wedge-shaped gaps due to unstable anterior bone cutting through hard bone, but the small gaps were not clinically significant and filled in within one year. Sagittal setting of the femoral component should aim for the anatomical axis rather than the mechanical axis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Radiographic assessment and clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device

It has been reported that an accelerometer-based portable navigation device can achieve accurate bone cuts, but there have been few studies of clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using such a device. The aim of this study was to evaluate lower limb alignment and clinical outcomes after TKA using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device. Thirty-five patients (40 knees) underwent primary TKAs using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device. Postoperative radiographic assessments included the hip-knee-ankle angle, femoral component angle (FCA), and tibial component angle (TCA) in the coronal plane and the sagittal FCA and sagittal TCA in the sagittal plane. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for osteoarthritic knees, Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure, and the New Knee Society Score. The frequency of outliers (>3 degrees) was 10% for the hip-knee-ankle angle, 8% for FCA, 0% for TCA, 19% for sagittal FCA, and 9% for sagittal TCA. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure were significantly improved postoperatively. The postoperative New Knee Society Score was 67.2% for symptoms, 50.3% for satisfaction, 58.6% for expectation, and 44.1% for function. TKA using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device achieved good results for both lower limb alignment and clinical outcomes.

Articular surface mounted navigated total knee arthroplasty improves the reliability of component alignment

PURPOSE

The primary aim was to compare the early knee-specific functional outcome after articular surface mounted (ASM) navigation with non-navigated TKA. The secondary aims were to compare general physical and mental health improvement, patient satisfaction, and reliability of component alignment in the sagittal and coronal planes between ASM navigated TKA with that of non-navigated TKA.

METHODS

Prospective functional outcome and radiographic data were collect for 123 patients undergoing ASM navigation and 172 patients undergoing non-navigated TKA by a high volume single surgeon. Pre-operative and one-year Oxford knee score (OKS) and short form (SF-) 12 scores were collected. Patient satisfaction was also assessed at one year. Implant position was assessed on post-operative radiographs (alpha, beta, gamma, and sigma angles) by a blinded observer.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference for improvement in OKS, SF-12 physical or mental components, or satisfaction between the groups one year following surgery. The non-navigation group was significantly more likely to have outliers (greater than 3 degrees) in femoral varus/valgus coronal alignment [odds ratio (OR) 4.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-20.7, p = 0.049] and for posterior tibial slope (OR 8.3, 95% CI 1.1-65.0, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

ASM navigation significantly reduces the number of outliers for the femoral and tibial components when compared to conventional non-navigation alignment. However, the short-term functional outcome is not influenced by the surgical technique used. If the surgeon wants to reduce their number of outliers, then ASM navigation should be considered but the overall functional outcome in the short term is not influenced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Therapeutic investigation, retrospective cohort study.

Effect of Computer Navigation on Accuracy and Reliability of Limb Alignment Correction following Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Meta-Analysis

Background

It is unclear whether computer navigation can improve the accuracy and reliability of targeted lower limb alignment correction following open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). This meta-analysis was designed to compare the accuracy and reliability of limb alignment correction between computer navigated and conventional open-wedge HTOs.

Methods

Studies that compared postoperative coronal alignment, including mechanical axis (MA) and weight bearing line (WBL) ratio, outliers of alignment correction, and change in tibial posterior slope, following open-wedge HTO performed using computer navigated and conventional methods were included.

Results

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. The MA (0.93°; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–1.41°; P < 0.001) and WBL ratio (1.5%; 95% CI: 0.03–2.98%; P = 0.048) were significantly greater for computer navigated HTO than for conventional HTO. Outliers of alignment correction after surgery were significantly lower in patients who underwent computer navigated HTO than in those who underwent conventional HTO (odds ratio: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.08–0.79; P = 0.02). Changes in posterior tibial slope from before to after surgery, however, were similar for the two approaches.

Conclusion

Computer navigated HTO resulted in slightly more valgus postoperative alignment and effectively reduced outliers of alignment correction but had no effect on change in posterior tibial slope when compared with conventional HTO.

Experience of total knee arthroplasty using a novel navigation system within the surgical field

BACKGROUND

With the aim of improving component alignment and outcome in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), several computer-assisted devices (CAD) have been developed.

METHODS

In February 2014, the present unit started to use a new imageless navigation system with accelerometric pods within the surgical field for all primary TKAs; there was no need for optical trackers or cameras. This paper presents the results of the first 72 TKAs using this iAssist system in 71 prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed patients. It analyzed component positioning in standard and full-length leg x-rays.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 70years (range 52-88). The center of hip, knee and ankle (mechanical axes) deviated on average 0.5° (standard deviation (SD) of 1.8) valgus from the targeted straight alignment. Three TKAs had >3° deviation (i.e. four degree varus, five degree and seven degree valgus). The frontal tibial tray alignment was an average of 89.9° (range 86.4-100.1°, SD ±2.0) with the target being 90°, and the sagittal slope was as targeted at 85.0° (range 78.4-88.8°, SD ±1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This CAD facilitated good mechanical alignment and reproducible accuracy in component positioning. Pods clipped onto cutting jigs within the surgical field provided simple and accurate navigation, with little extra time needed for calibration and no need for optical trackers or pre-operative imaging.

Conventional versus computer-navigated TKA: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the midterm results of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implanted with a specific computer navigation system in a group of patients (NAV) and to assess the same prosthesis implanted with the conventional technique in another group (CON); we hypothesized that computer navigation surgery would improve implant alignment, functional scores and survival of the implant compared to the conventional technique.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2009, 225 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned in CON and NAV groups; 240 consecutive mobile-bearing ultra-congruent score (Amplitude, Valence, France) TKAs were performed by a single surgeon, 117 using the conventional method and 123 using the computer-navigated approach. Clinical outcome assessment was based on the Knee Society Score (KSS), the Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Score and the Western Ontario Mac Master University Index score. Component survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 6.4 years (range 6-7 years). Two patients were lost to follow-up. No differences were seen between the two groups in age, sex, BMI and side of implantation. Three patients of CON group referred feelings of instability during walking, but clinical tests were all negative. NAV group showed statistical significant better KSS Score and wider ROM and fewer outliers from neutral mechanical axis, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle and tibial slope in post-operative radiographic assessment. There was one case of early post-operative superficial infection (caused by Staph. Aureus) successfully treated with antibiotics. No mechanical loosening, mobile-bearing dislocation or patellofemoral complication was seen. At 7 years of follow-up, component survival in relation to the risk of aseptic loosening or other complications was 100 %. There were no implant revisions.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates superior accuracy in implant positioning and statistical significant better functional outcomes of computer-navigated TKA. Computer navigation for TKAs should be used routinely in primary implants.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Influence of coronal bowing on the lower alignment and the positioning of component in navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Coronal alignment is an important factor for the function and longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Coronal bowing of the lower extremity is common among Asians and it may pose a risk for malalignment of the lower leg and malposition of component.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that coronal bowing itself has a risk for malalignment of the lower leg and malposition of femoral/tibial components and that navigation TKA is beneficial for patients with coronal bowing. We investigated the incidence of femoral/tibial bowing in patients treated with TKA and compared the radiographic parameters between the navigation group and the conventional group. Additionally, the influence of coronal bowing on these radiographic parameters was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 35 patients with knee osteoarthritis and 70 bilateral simultaneous TKAs. The patients underwent TKA with the use of a computer tomography-free navigation in one knee and conventional TKA in the contralateral knee. Preoperative coronal bowing were measured, and the subjects were divided into 2 subgroups, i.e. the bowing group and the non-bowing group. Lateral bowing was expressed as plus (+) and medial bowing was expressed as minus (-). Various radiographic parameters, including coronal bowing, lower leg alignment, component position, and outliers were compared between the navigation group and the conventional group.

RESULTS

Femoral bowing varied from -7.4° to 10.9° with an average of 3.0°. Tibial bowing varied from -4.1° to 4.6° with an average of 0.4°. The femoral component was placed more properly in the navigation group. Number of outlier regarding to the coronal femoral component angle to the femoral mechanical axis was 14 cases (37.8%) in the bowing group and 6 cases (18.2%) in the non-bowing group (P=0.04).

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, coronal femoral bowing has an important effect on femoral bone cut in TKA. The navigated TKA was more consistent than conventional TKA in aiding proper alignments of femoral component.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, comparative prospective study.

Superior femoral component alignment can be achieved with Oxford microplasty instrumentation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Oxford microplasty (MP) instrumentation has been developed to facilitate the reproducible and consistent performance of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MI-UKA) operation. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of two groups of patients implanted using either a conventional instrumentation technique or an MP technique.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 108 knees in 108 patients who underwent an MI-UKA procedure using either conventionally instrumented UKA (CI-UKA) (52 knees of 52 patients) or MP-assisted UKA (MP-UKA) (56 knees of 56 patients). The clinical assessment included the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), the Knee Society Score (KSS), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and range of motion (ROM). Complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding OKS, KSS, VAS, and ROM. There were also no significant differences in terms of mechanical limb alignment and tibia implant alignment. However, the MP-UKA group showed significantly more accurate positioning of the femoral component than the CI-UKA group. Additionally, the MP-UKA group had more femoral prostheses implanted in the "satisfactory" range and fewer "outliers" than the CI-UKA group. No significant difference in complications was noted between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

This study suggested that compared with CI-UKA, MP-UKA provides significant improvements in increasing the accuracy of sagittal and coronal implantation of the femoral component and in reducing the numbers of outliers for femoral prosthetic alignment. It is advocated that the MP system should be considered when MI-UKA is performed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IV.

Meta-analysis of gap balancing versus measured resection techniques in total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

There are two techniques widely used to determine the rotational alignment of the components in total knee arthroplasty (TKA); gap balancing (GB) and measured resection (MR). Which technique is the best remains controversial. We aimed to investigate this in a systematic review and meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In accordance with the methods of Cochrane, databases were searched for all randomised controlled trials in the literature between January 1986 and June 2015 comparing radiographic and clinical outcomes between the use of these two tecniques. Meta-analysis involved the use of the Revman5.3 software provided by Cochrane collaboration.

RESULTS

A total of 1464 papers were initially identified, and after the application of rigourous inclusion and exclusion critera, eight were included in the study. In total they inolved 980 TKAs. The meta-analysis showed that GB techniques resulted in statistically significant improvements in the restoration of mechanical and rotational alignment and mean Knee Society Scores and Knee Society Function scores two years post-operatively, but resulted in greater elevation of the position of the joint line. There is no significant difference in the other radiographic data.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that GB may provide better radiographic and clinical outcomes than MR when used to determine mechanical rotation in TKAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:151-8.

A randomized controlled clinical and radiological trial about outcomes of navigation-assisted TKA compared to conventional TKA: long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Well balanced knees with good alignment are essential for a well-functioning TKA with long survival of its implants. This prospective randomized study comparing navigation-assisted TKA and conventional TKA reported the clinical and radiological outcomes at a follow-up of 9 years. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes for patients who underwent navigation-assisted TKA or conventional TKA after long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients (88 knees) were available for physical and radiological examination 9 years after TKA. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using HSS, WOMAC, and KS function and pain scores. And radiological outcomes of the component loosening and its survivorship during 9-year follow-up were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the field of clinical outcomes between the two groups. In terms of radiological outcomes, the navigation group had fewer alignment outliers (7.3 vs 20 %, p = 0.006). Although the clinical outcomes showed no differences between the two groups, the survival rate was slightly better in the navigation group than in the conventional group without statistical significance (best-case scenario 100 vs 95.3 %, n.s., worst-case scenario 95.6 vs 88.4 %, n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Navigation-assisted TKA produced better alignment outcomes and better survival rates than conventional instruments although some of the differences were not statistically significant.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Total knee arthroplasty in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus arthritic knee with a marked coronal femoral bowing deformity: comparison between computer-assisted surgery and intra-articular resection

Background

Proper limb and component alignments as well as soft tissue balance are vital for the longevity and optimal long-term outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This procedure is technically demanding in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus arthritic knees with marked coronal femoral bowing. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and intra-articular bone resection with TKA are the treatments of choice for patients with ipsilateral extra-articular deformity. In theory, both CAS and intra-articular bone resection are beneficial in Ranawat type-II valgus arthritic knees with marked coronal femoral bowing deformity, but the literature on this topic is sparse. We compared the benefits of using these two techniques for TKA under this circumstance.

Methods

Patients who had Ranawat type-II valgus arthritic knees and marked coronal femoral bowing deformity and had undergone TKA at our hospital between 2005 and 2013 were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients treated with CAS were assigned to the CAS-TKA group; patients treated with intra-articular bone resection were assigned to the Bone-Resect-TKA group. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes (International Knee Society (IKS) scores and patellar scores) in both groups were compared.

Results

Forty-seven patients (50 knees) met the inclusion criteria: 22 knees in the CAS-TKA group and 28 knees in the Bone-Resect-TKA group. Lateral retinaculum release was significantly (P = 0.008) higher in the Bone-Resect-TKA group. The joint-line was significantly properly restored in the CAS-TKA group (P = 0.011). The reconstructed mechanical axis was significantly (P = 0.012) closer to normal in the CAS-TKA group than in the Bone-Resect-TKA group. For component alignment, the femoral valgus and femoral flexion angles were significantly better in the CAS-TKA group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.006, respectively), but not the tibial valgus, tibial flexion, or patellar tilting angles. IKS scores and patellar scores were not significantly different between groups at a mean follow-up of 60.2 months.

Conclusions

CAS-TKA was effective for obtaining proper alignment and joint-line restoration in patients with Ranawat type-II valgus arthritic knees and marked coronal femoral bowing deformity, but not for yielding better clinical outcomes. Additional large-scale prospective randomized cohort studies with long-term follow-ups are necessary to make evidence-based recommendations.

Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods

PURPOSE

The intraoperative sagittal cutting block alignment when intramedullary alignment rods are used was investigated. Its absolute orthogonal orientation in relation to the mechanical femoral axis should be analysed. It was hypothesized that (1) alignment rods do not ensure a desired deviation within a range between 0° and 3° flexion as it has been shown to be favourable for clinical and functional outcome. Further, the degree of flexion cannot be (2) foreseen by the surgeon or (3) estimated by clinical or radiological parameters.

METHODS

Forty knees allocated to total knee arthroplasty were included. The distal femoral cutting block was aligned using an intramedullary rod. By means of a navigation device, the sagittal alignment of the cutting block in degrees of flexion was measured.

RESULTS

The mean measured flexion of the cutting block was 4.4° (3.6 SD). Twenty-five per cent (10/40) of the values were within a corridor between 0° and 3° of flexion. The mean difference between expected and measured flexion was -1.5° (-7.6 to 4.7 95 % limits of agreement). The dorsoventral diameter of the distal femur showed a significant influence on measured flexion (R (2) = 0.112, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Intramedullary alignment rods used in the present study do not ensure a distal cutting block alignment between 0° and 3° of flexion in relation to the femoral mechanical axis. The extent of flexion could not be foreseen either by the surgeon. The dorsoventral diameter of the distal femur correlated with measured flexion. However, only limited data is available on influence of femoral component flexion on implant failure or clinical and functional outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II.

Improved femoral component rotation in advanced genu valgum deformity using computer-assisted measured resection total knee arthroplasty

Background

Accurate femoral rotational alignment is of vital importance for successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The value of computer-assisted surgery TKA (CAS-TKA) in increasing the accuracy of femoral rotational alignment remains controversial. We hypothesize that outcomes are related to the severity of preoperative varus and valgus deformity and that CAS-TKA may be beneficial under certain circumstances.

Methods

Between January 2007 and December 2013, patients with osteoarthritis and varus angulation in the mechanical axis (MA) ≥ 15° and valgus angulation in the MA ≥ 10° (based on hip-to-ankle standing radiography) who underwent TKA were divided into four groups. CAS-TKA and conventional TKA outcomes were compared in patients who had preoperative advanced genu varum and advanced genu valgum deformities. The accuracy of component alignment and postoperative limb alignment was determined using radiographic parameters and computed tomography (CT).

Results

One hundred and eight patients (144 knees) were included in the analysis. For patients with preoperative advanced genu varum deformity, a significant difference was detected in the sagittal femoral angle (p < 0.001), but no significant improvement of femoral rotational alignment was noted (p = 0.127). In patients with preoperative advanced genu valgum deformity, a significant difference was found in the sagittal femoral angle (p = 0.034). The femoral rotational angle was significantly closer to the proper position in the CAS-TKA group (p < 0.001). When comparing the percentage of knees achieving the proper alignment, there was a decrease in the amount of outlier for the femoral rotational angle for CAS-TKA in advanced genu valgum deformity (p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Our data demonstrate that CAS-TKA is beneficial in obtaining proper femoral rotational alignment in patients with advanced genu valgum deformity (preoperative MA ≥ 10° valgus). In patients with advanced genu varum deformity (preoperative MA ≥ 15° varus), CAS-TKA did not improve the femoral rotational alignment.

The Influence of Alignment on Midterm Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Marked Coronal Femoral Bowing

Whether the mechanical axis should be restored to neutral remains controversial when the patient has marked coronal femoral bowing. Eighty-four total knee arthroplasties were retrospectively reviewed. In the neutral-aligned group A the immediate postoperative mechanical axis of 179 ± 1° held stable (P = 0.841). The postoperative mechanical axis decreased from 176 ± 1° to 173 ± 1° (P = 0.024) in the outlier group. Progressive varus in the outlier group at follow-up was probably due implant instability and ligament imbalance as well as excessive polyethylene wear. At a mean follow-up of 75.8 months, no statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups. Long-term follow up will be needed to determine if the maintenance in radiographic results translates to better clinical outcomes.

The benefits of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty on coronal alignment with marked femoral bowing in Asian patients

Background

Mechanical alignment guides are designed to compensate for variations in the valgus alignment angle; however, these guides may not be adequate when a patient has coronal alignment with marked bowing deformity. Previous study demonstrates better radiographic results, but the clinical benefits are a matter of speculation. The aim of this study was to investigate whether radiographic benefits of computer-assisted surgery total knee arthroplasty (CAS-TKA) would translate to clinical outcomes.

Methods

Patients with osteoarthritis and coronal alignment with marked bowing deformity who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at our institution between January 2005 and June 2012 were entered into this retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups: patients with coronal alignment with marked bowing deformity treated with CAS-TKA; with coronal alignment with marked bowing deformity treated with conventional TKA; and without marked coronal bowing deformity treated with conventional TKA. The computer-assisted navigation and the conventional technique were then compared by radiographic parameters. The International Knee Society (IKS) scores and patellar score were obtained for all patients preoperatively and at the last follow-up visit.

Results

One hundred and thirty-seven patients (198 knees) met the inclusion criteria. For patients with osteoarthritic knees with marked femoral bowing deformity, the reconstructed mechanical axis (MA) was significantly closer to normal in the CAS-TKA group (P = 0.002) than in the conventional group. Significant differences in the reconstructed MA after conventional TKA were noted between patients without bowing and those with bowing (P = 0.003). Using the patellar score and IKS score, at a mean follow-up of 52.2 months, the differences did not achieve statistical significance among the three groups.

Conclusions

CAS-TKA was an effective alternative for obtaining proper alignment in patients with coronal alignment with marked bowing deformity. However, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical function between patients treated with CAS-TKA and conventional TKA. Long-term follow-up will be needed to determine if the improvement in radiographic results translates to better clinical outcomes.