Usefulness of long tibial axis to measure medial tibial slope for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy

Slope Osteotomies in the Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

➤ Posterior tibial slope (PTS) of ≥12° represents an important risk factor for both anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction failure.➤ PTS measurements can significantly differ on the basis of the imaging modality and the measurement technique used. PTS should be measured on strictly lateral radiographs, with a recommended proximal tibial length of 15 cm in the image. The PTS measurement can be made by placing 2 circles to define the proximal tibial axis, 1 just below the tibial tubercle and another 10 cm below it. PTS measurements are underestimated when made on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.➤ Slope-reducing osteotomies can be performed using a (1) supratuberosity, (2) tubercle-reflecting transtuberosity, or (3) infratuberosity method. The correction target remains a topic of debate. Although it is controversial, some authors recommend overcorrecting the tibial slope slightly to a range of 4° to 6°. For instance, if the initial slope is 12°, a correction of 6° to 8° should be performed, given the target tibial slope of 4° to 6°.➤ Clinical outcomes following slope-reducing osteotomies have been favorable. However, potential complications, limited data with regard to the impact of slope-reducing osteotomies on osteoarthritis, and uncertainty with regard to the effects on the patellofemoral joint are notable concerns.➤ Patients with complex deformities may need biplanar osteotomies to comprehensively address the condition.

[The correct tibial slope? Comparison of measuring methods]

INTRODUCTION

From a biomechanical point of view, the tibial slope plays a significant role in relation to the loading of the ligament structures in the knee joint. Currently, there are various methods of measurement for the tibial slope, which makes it difficult to compare the measurement results obtained. These differences can be decisive factors for the indication and the extent respectively of the correction of the tibial slope. The aim of this work is to present the differences in results between the measurement methods, and to compare these with the posterior tibial slope (PTS).

METHODS

By means of a comparative analysis, six measurement techniques for the tibial slope were examined. Using six parameters (correlation coefficient, range, deviation of the average slope value, correction coefficient, difference in the corrected measurements, range of the corrected measurements), these results were compared with the PTS. In this prospective study, the PTS was measured in 107 (49 male, 58 female, age 42.6 ± 23.4 years) strictly lateral plain radiological projections of the tibia with the talocrural joint in comparison with the measurement methods according to Han, Brazier, Moore and Harvey, Pietrini and LaPrade and a supratuberosity measurement.

RESULTS

The posterior slope was observed at a mean value of 6.9° (± 8.6°). Compared with the PTS, tibial slope values were increased in 55.5 % of all measurements examined and decreased in 42.4 %. In 2 % the values were identical to those of PTS. The deviations observed were significant at up to +2.9° (± 1.7°) and -2.3° (± 1.5°) respectively in comparison with the measured PTS (p < 0.001). 25.9 % of the results showed a slope value more than 2°too high and 17.6 % one less than -2° too low. Thus, in 43 % of the results clinically relevant results that were too high or too low were observed for the tibial slope compared with the PTS (p < 0.001). The correlation analyses showed very high linear connections with PTS (p < 0.001) for all methods, from r2 = 0.88 (in Moore and Harvey) up to r2 = 0.98 (in Han). The ranges varied between 13.90° (Moore and Harvey) and 18.30° (Han).

CONCLUSION

Depending on the measurement method, the slope values obtained should be individually evaluated, in order to draw the correct clinical conclusions. In principle, the radiological assessment of the whole lower leg is essential, so that concomitant pathologies in the area of the entire tibia can be detected. In everyday clinical practice, the measurement according to Han et al., and thus a shorter X‑ray projection, makes it possible to draw optimal conclusions about the PTS. LOE: Prospective diagnostic study, Level II.

Variability Between Full-Length Lateral Radiographs and Standard Short Knee Radiographs When Evaluating Posterior Tibial Slope in Revision ACL Patients

Background

Increased posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been identified as a risk factor for failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Correction of PTS may improve outcomes after revision ACL reconstruction. There are conflicting reports demonstrating the measurement of the PTS on standard short knee (SSK) radiographs versus full-length lateral (FLL) radiographs including the entire tibia.

Purpose/Hypothesis

To compare PTS measurements between SSK and FLL radiographs in patients who failed primary ACL reconstruction. It was hypothesized that there would be high variability between the SSK and FLL radiographic measurements.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods

The medial and lateral PTS were measured on the SSK and FLL radiographs of 33 patients with failed primary ACL reconstructions. All measurements were performed by 2 trained independent observers (A.A.M., J.S.), and inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Measurements recorded by the observer with the higher intraobserver ICC were used for comparison of the PTS on SSK versus FLL radiographs.

Results

Both the inter- and the intraobserver reliability values of the PTS measurements were excellent. There was a significant difference in mean PTS on the medial plateau as measured on the SSK and FLL radiographs (11.2°± 5.3° vs 12.5°± 4.6°; P = .03), with the FLL radiographs demonstrating higher PTS. There was also a significant difference in the mean PTS on the lateral plateau as measured on SSK versus FLL radiographs (10.7°± 4.3° vs 12.2°± 4°, respectively; P = .01), with the FLL radiographs demonstrating higher PTS. Notably, 66.67% of the absolute measurements for PTS on the medial plateau differed by ≥2°, with variability as high as 8.5°.

Conclusion

Results indicated that FLL and SSK radiographs are not interchangeable measurements for PTS associated with failed ACL reconstruction. Because FLL radiographs demonstrate less variability than SSK radiographs, we recommend obtaining them to evaluate these complex patients.

Measurement of tibial slope using biplanar stereoradiography (EOS®)

OBJECTIVES

Posterior tibial slope (PTS) is an important anatomic parameter of the knee related to anteroposterior instability. Biplanar stereoradiography allows for simultaneous low-dose acquisition of anteroposterior and lateral views with 3D capability, enabling separate lateral and medial plateau analyses. We aimed to evaluate the possibility and compare the reproducibility of measuring medial and lateral PTS on EOS® images with two different patient positionings and compare it with CT of the knees as the gold standard.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study including volunteers who underwent lower limb stereoradiography and knee CT from 01/08/2016 to 07/31/2019. Sixty legs from 30 patients were studied. PTS were measured using stereoradiography and CT by two radiologists. Intraclass correlation was used to calculate intrarater and interrater reproducibilities. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to calculate the correlation between stereoradiography and CT. We also compared the reproducibility of the stereoradiography of volunteers with 2 different positionings.

RESULTS

The mean stereoradiography PTS values for right and left knees were as follows: lateral, 12.2° (SD: 4.1) and 10.1° (SD: 3.5); medial,12.2° (SD: 4.4) and 11.6° (SD: 3.9). CT PTS mean values for right and left knee are as follows: lateral, 10.3° (SD:2.5) and 10.6° (SD: 2.8); medial: 8.7° (SD: 3.7) and 10.4° (SD: 3.5). Agreement between CT and EOS for angles between lateral and medial PTS was good (right, 0.874; left, 0.871). Regarding patient positioning on stereoradiography, interrater and intrarater reproducibilities were greater for patients with nonparallel feet (0.738-0.883 and 0.870-0.975).

CONCLUSIONS

Stereoradiography allows for appropriate delineation of tibial plateaus, especially in patients with nonparallel feet, for the purpose of measuring PTS. The main advantage is lower radiation doses compared to radiography and CT.

Comparison of clinical, imaging and second-look arthroscopic outcomes between varus knee patients with and without preoperative tibial varus deformity after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the regeneration status of articular cartilage, clinical, and radiologic outcomes between varus knee patients with and without preoperative tibial varus deformity (PTVD) after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) METHODS: Varus knee patients who had undergone OWHTO were divided into two groups according to preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA): a great varus (GV) group (MPTA <85°) and a mild varus (MV) group (85°≤preoperative MPTA <87°). The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, weight-bearing line ratio (WBL%), MPTA, joint line convergence angle and joint line obliquity were measured. Second-look arthroscopy was undertaken 24 months after HTO. The Knee Society (KS) function score and knee score, and Lysholm score were used to evaluate the functional outcomes. All parameters were evaluated preoperatively and 24 months after HTO.

RESULTS

The GV group had greater varus than the MV group in HKA and WBL% before surgery, but greater valgus after surgery. The arthroscopic probe before HTO revealed the advanced chondral damage in the GV group and lighter chondral damage in the MV group. The regeneration of medial femoral condyle was considerably more frequent in the GV group (72.5%, 45/62) than in the MV group (50.0%, 27/54) (P = 0.030). No significant differences were observed in all functional outcomes preoperatively and 24 months after HTO.

CONCLUSION

The extent of cartilage regeneration in patients without PTVD was inferior to that in those with PTVD, but the functional outcomes were comparable. OWHTO may be a treatment option in a selected subset of varus knee patients without PTVD.

Can double-level osteotomy prevent patellofemoral osteoarthritis progression compared with open wedge high tibial osteotomy?

PURPOSE

To compare radiographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings in patellofemoral (PF) osteoarthritis (OA) between open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and double-level osteotomy (DLO) with the same operative indication.

METHODS

After adjustment for patient age, and coronal alignment, 36 knees with OWHTO alone and 36 knees with DLO were compared. Radiographic, clinical, and arthroscopic findings were documented before osteotomy. Arthroscopic findings were observed 1 year after osteotomy, and clinical and radiographic findings were observed 2 years after osteotomy. Patellar height was evaluated using the Insall-Salvati (IS) ratio, Carton-Deschamps (CD) index, and Blackburne-Peel (BP) index. Lateral patellar tilt and patellar shift were measured. A power analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The postoperative CD and BP indices in the OWHTO group were lower than those in the DLO group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The CD and BP indices in both groups significantly decreased postoperatively (all p < 0.001). Tilting angles in the OWHTO and DLO groups significantly decreased postoperatively (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in American Knee Society scores, Kujala score, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores between both groups. The PF OA progression of the trochlear in the OWHTO group was higher than that in the DLO group (p = 0.002), and the PF OA progression of the patellar facet in the DLO group and anterior femoral condyle in both groups on the lateral side were higher than those on the medial side (p = 0.006, 0.032, and 0.041, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DLO decreased the rate of low patellar height compared with OWHTO. DLO decreased the rate of PF OA progression in the trochlea compared with OWHTO. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

A review of role of osteotomy in knee ligament injuries

Realignment osteotomies around the knee joint are used primarily for management of arthritis. Traditionally, an unstable knee has been considered a contraindication for osteotomy. But with a better understanding of biomechanics of osteotomies and their effect on ligament instabilities, the beneficial role of osteotomies in managing an unstable knee is becoming clearer. This review looks at recent literature on this subject to help in formulating a management plan especially in failed ligament reconstruction patients.

Posterior tibial slope measurements based on the full-length tibial anatomic axis are significantly increased compared to those based on the half-length tibial anatomic axis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the difference in posterior tibial slope (PTS) measurements based on the full-length and half-length tibial anatomic axes of the same group of patients. It was hypothesized that the obtained PTS values would be affected by the length of tibia chosen during the measurements.

METHODS

Full-length true lateral tibia radiographs were obtained for each patient who underwent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in our department. PTS measurements were obtained by measuring the angle between the full-length or half-length tibial anatomic axis and an average of the lateral and medial tibial plateau. The anatomic axis was defined as the center of the tibial diaphysis. The PTS measurements from the full-length and half-length true lateral tibia radiographs were obtained and compared. Additionally, the absolute difference and the relationship between the two PTS measurements were calculated and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 200 ACL-injured patients were included in this study. The average PTS values using the anatomic axis were 15.9 ± 3.7° and 14.1 ± 3.7° on full-length and half-length true lateral tibial radiographs. There was a significant difference between the measurements with the full-length and half-length tibial radiographs (P < 0.01). Additionally, 49.5% (n = 99) of patients had ≥ 2.0° differences between the full-length and half-length anatomic axis PTS measurement techniques; meanwhile, a strong and significant linear relationship (r = 0.95; P < 0.001) was identified between the two PTS measurements.

CONCLUSION

There were significant differences and linear relationships between PTS measurements that measured the anatomic axis from full-length and half-length true lateral tibia radiographs. Therefore, the obtained PTS values were strongly associated with the length of tibia chosen during the measurements. Surgeons should pay more attention to the measurement techniques and the tibial length when considering the role of PTS in ACL injury and ACLR failure. Knowledge of the association is very important for calculating potential closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomies to correct excessive PTS in the setting of ACLR failures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The Effect of Posterior Tibial Slope on the Risk of Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

A significant proportion of patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) later experience graft failure. Some studies suggest an association between a steep posterior tibial slope (PTS) and graft failure.

PURPOSE

To examine the PTS in a large cohort of patients about to undergo ACLR and to determine whether a steep PTS is associated with later revision surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a cohort undergoing isolated ACLR between 2002 and 2012 (with 8-19 years of follow-up) was conducted. Preoperative sagittal radiographs of knees in full extension were used for measurements of the PTS. There were 2 independent examiners who performed repeated measurements to assess the reliability of the method. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the PTS in the groups with and without later revision surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 728 patients, with a mean age of 28 years at the time of surgery, were included. Overall, 10% (n = 76) underwent revision surgery during the observation period. The group of injured knees had a significantly steeper PTS compared with the group of uninjured knees (9.5° vs 8.7°, respectively; P < .05). The mean PTS in the no revision group was 9.5° compared with 9.3° in the revision group (not significant). Dichotomized testing of revision rates related to PTS cutoff values of ≥10°, ≥12°, ≥14°, ≥16°, and ≥18° showed no association of PTS steepness (not significant) to graft failure. Patients with revision were younger than the ones without (mean age, 24 ± 8 vs 29 ± 10 years, respectively) and had a shorter time from injury to ACLR (mean, 14 ± 27 vs 24 ± 44 months, respectively) as well as a smaller graft size (8.2 vs 8.4 mm, respectively; P = .040).

CONCLUSION

The current study did not find any association between a steep PTS measured on lateral knee radiographs and revision ACL surgery. However, a steeper PTS was seen in the group of injured knees compared with the group of uninjured (contralateral) knees. Independent of the PTS, younger patients, those with a shorter time from injury to surgery, and those with a smaller graft size were found to undergo revision surgery more often.

Effect of the Osteotomy Inclination Angle in the Sagittal Plane on the Posterior Tibial Slope of the Tibiofemoral Joint in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis

The posterior tibial slope of the tibiofemoral joint changes after medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), but little is known about the effect of the sagittal osteotomy inclination angle on the change in the posterior tibial slope of the tibiofemoral joint. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of the osteotomy inclination angle in the sagittal plane on changes in the posterior tibial slope after MOWHTO by comparing how anterior and posterior inclination affect the posterior tibial slope of the tibiofemoral joint. The correlation between the osteotomy inclination angle and the postoperative posterior tibial slope angle was also assessed. Between May 2011 and November 2017, 80 patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis who underwent MOWHTO were included. The patients were divided into two groups according to the sagittal osteotomy inclination angle on the 3D reconstructed model. Patients with an osteotomy line inclined anteriorly to the medial tibial plateau line were classified into group A (58 patients). Patients with posteriorly inclined osteotomy line were classified as group P (22 patients). In the 3D reconstructed model, the preoperative and postoperative posterior tibial slope, osteotomy inclination angle relative to medial tibial plateau line in sagittal plane, and gap distance and ratio of the anterior and posterior osteotomy openings were measured. The preoperative and postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, weight-bearing line ratio, and posterior tibial slope were also measured using plain radiographs. In the 3D reconstructed model, the postoperative posterior tibial slope significantly increased in group A (preoperative value = 9.7 ± 2.9°, postoperative value = 10.7 ± 3.0°, p < 0.001) and decreased in group P (preoperative value = 8.7 ± 2.7°, postoperative value = 7.7 ± 2.7°, p < 0.001). The postoperative posterior tibial slope (group A = 10.7 ± 3.0°, group P = 7.7 ± 2.7°, p < 0.001) and posterior tibial slope change before and after surgery (group A = 1.0 ± 0.8°, group P = −0.9 ± 0.8°, p < 0.001) also differed significantly between the groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.875 (p < 0.001) for the osteotomy inclination angle, and multivariate regression analysis showed that the only significant factor among the variables was the sagittal osteotomy inclination angle (β coefficient = 0.216, p < 0.001). The posterior tibial slope changed according to the osteotomy inclination angle in the sagittal plane after MOWHTO. The postoperative posterior tibial slope tended to increase when the osteotomy line was inclined anteriorly with respect to the medial tibial plateau line but decreased when the osteotomy line was inclined posteriorly. To avoid inadvertent change of posterior tibial slope, close attention needs to be paid to maintaining the sagittal osteotomy line parallel to the medial joint line during MOWHTO.

The EOS 3D imaging system reliably measures posterior tibial slope

Background

One of the values determined during the assessment of knee issues is the posterior tibial slope (PTS). A new option for measuring the PTS is the EOS 3D imaging system, which provides anteroposterior (AP) and lateral long leg radiographs (LLRs) using less radiation than a conventional LLR. We investigated the reliability of the EOS 3D imaging system with respect to PTS measurements.

Methods

We retrospectively searched our radiological database for patients who underwent an EOS scan and a computed tomography (CT) scan of their lower extremities between January and December 2019. Fifty-six knees were included in the study. Medial and lateral PTSs were determined using both modalities. A radiologist and an orthopaedic surgeon each performed all measurements twice and the intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated to assess inter- and intrarater reliability. The Student t test and Pearson correlation were used to compare the results of both imaging modalities.

Results

The mean medial PTS was 8.5° (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1–8.9°) for the EOS system and 7.7° (95% CI, 7.3–8.1°) for CT, and the lateral PTS was 7.4° (95% CI, 6.9–7.9°) for the EOS system, and 7.0° (95% CI, 6.5–7.4°) for CT. Interrater reliability (ICC) with respect to medial and lateral PTSs measured on the EOS (0.880, 0.765) and CT (0.884, 0.887) images was excellent. The intrarater reliability of reader 1 (ICC range, 0.889–0.986) and reader 2 (ICC range, 0.868–0.980) with respect to the same measurements was excellent.

Conclusion

The PTS measurements from the EOS 3D imaging system are as reliable and reproducible as those from CT, the current gold standard method. We recommend using this system if possible, because it acquires more information (sagittal plane) in a scan than a conventional LLR, while exposing the patient to less radiation.

Level of evidence

Level III, Retrospective cohort study

Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy using intraoperative control of joint line convergence angle with reference to preoperative supine radiograph

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative supine joint line convergence angle (JLCA) correlates with postoperative standing JLCA. Here, we compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes of knees with preoperative JLCAs of ≥ 4° and < 4° in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). We hypothesized that the postoperative coronal alignment in both groups would not be affected by a change in JLCA if this change could predict before surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-four patients with medial knee osteoarthritis who underwent OWHTO were enrolled retrospectively. A weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio of 62% and a JCLA equivalent to the preoperative supine JLCA were anticipated in preoperative planning. These were intraoperatively set using an alignment rod and a radiolucent protractor under fluoroscopy. Soft tissue correction was defined as correction angle minus bone correction. The participants with preoperative JLCAs of < 4° (low-JLCA group) and ≥ 4° (high-JLCA group) were compared.

RESULTS

No significant difference in the coronal alignment was found between the groups after OWHTO. No significant differences in correction angle or bone correction were found between the groups, but the soft tissue correction in the high-JLCA group was higher than that in the low-JLCA group after OWHTO (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

When we controlled intraoperative JLCA, the postoperative coronal alignment was not affected by the change in JLCA and the differences in soft tissue correction between the low-JLCA and high-JLCA groups. However, overcorrection compared with the target coronal alignment remained in both groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Planning Results for High Tibial Osteotomies in Degenerative Varus Osteoarthritis Using Standing and Supine Whole Leg Radiographs

Objective

In this study, we hypothesized that standing and supine X‐rays lead to different preoperative planning results.

Methods

The present study included 168 pictures from 81 patients who were treated surgically with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for varus deformity between January 2017 and February 2018. Each patient underwent whole leg X‐ray examinations in both standing and supine position. On both images, the following parameters were measured: degree of axis deviation (DAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), width of medial (MJS) and lateral joint space (LJS), and the correction angle (CA). The results were correlated with the patients’ age and body mass index (BMI). To analyze intra‐observer reliability, the same researcher, blinded to the previous measurements, remeasured all X‐rays from 10 patients 8 weeks after the initial measurements were carried out.

Results

While mLDFA (P = 0.075), mMPTA (P = 0.435), and MJS (P = 0.119) did not show any differences between the two modalities, LJS (P = 0.016) and DAD (P < 0.001) differed significantly, leading to different correction angles (P < 0.001). The mean difference of the CA was 1.7° ± 2.2° (range, −2.6° to−15.4°). In 14 legs (17%), the standing X‐ray led to a correction angle that was at least 3° larger than the calculation revealed in the supine X‐ray; in 4 legs (5%), it was at least 5° larger. Increased BMI (r = 0.191, P = 0.088) and older age (r = 0.057 , P = 0.605) did not show relevant correlation with DAD differences. However, more severe varus malalignment in the supine radiograph did correlate moderately with differences of correction angles between supine and weight‐bearing radiographs (r = 0.414, P < 0.001). The analysis of the intra‐rater reliability revealed mediocre to excellent intercorrelation coefficients between the measurements of the observer.

Conclusion

The use of supine and standing X‐ray images leads to different planning results when performing high tibial osteotomies for varus gonarthrosis. To avoid potential overcorrection, surgeons might consider increased lateral joint spaces on standing radiographs in osteoarthritic knees with varus deviation.

Steep Posterior Tibial Slope and Excessive Anterior Tibial Translation Are Predictive Risk Factors of Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Case-Control Study With Prospectively Collected Data

BACKGROUND

Steep posterior tibial slope (PTS) and excessive anterior tibial translation (ATT) have been identified as important anatomic risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, which have raised concerns about clinical outcomes after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

PURPOSE

To investigate anatomic risk factors of primary ACLR failure and to determine the cutoff values of PTS and ATT for predicting primary ACLR failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Between November 2015 and May 2017, a total of 215 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed noncontact ACL injuries who underwent primary anatomic ACLR were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 25 patients who showed complete discontinuity of ACL fibers on final follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans were allocated into the failure group (study group). They were matched 1:2 to 50 control participants who showed clear and continuous ACL fibers on magnetic resonance imaging scans (control group). PTS and ATT were measured on preoperative weightbearing whole leg lateral radiographs and compared between the groups. The cutoff values of PTS and ATT for predicting primary ACLR failure were determined by the receiver operating characteristic curve. Moreover, predictors of primary ACLR failure were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis, including sex, age, body mass index, concomitant meniscal tears, degree of pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference, PTS, and ATT.

RESULTS

PTS and ATT values in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group (mean ± SD: PTS, 17.2°± 2.2° vs 14.4°± 2.8°; ATT, 8.3 ± 3.4 mm vs 4.1 ± 3.1 mm; P < .001). The cutoff values of PTS and ATT for predicting primary ACLR failure were 17° (sensitivity, 66.7%; specificity, 90.9%) and 6 mm (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 79.5%), respectively. Additionally, PTS ≥17° (odds ratio, 15.6; 95% CI, 2.7-91.5; P = .002) and ATT ≥6 mm (odds ratio, 9.9; 95% CI, 1.9-51.4; P = .006) were determined to be risk factors of primary ACLR failure, whereas sex, age, body mass index, concomitant meniscal tears, degree of the pivot-shift test, and KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference were not.

CONCLUSION

In this study, PTS ≥17° and ATT ≥6 mm, as measured on weightbearing whole leg radiographs, were identified to be predictive risk factors of primary ACLR failure. This study adds to the existing knowledge about potential surgical indications of simultaneous slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy to mitigate the primary ACLR failure rate.

Assessment of the tibial slope is highly dependent on the type and accuracy of the preceding acquisition

BACKGROUND

Precise measurement of the tibial slope (TS) is crucial for realignment surgery, ligament reconstruction, and arthroplasty. However, there is little consensus on the ideal assessment. It was hypothesized that the tibial slope changes according to the acquisition technique and both tibial length as well as femoral rotation serve as potential confounders.

METHODS

104 patients (37 women, 67 men; range 12-66 years) were retrospectively selected, of which all patients underwent a 1.5-Tesla MRI and either additional standard lateral radiographs (SLR, n = 52) or posterior stress radiographs (PSR, n = 52) of the index knee. Two blinded observers evaluated the medial tibial slope as the medial TS is primarily used in clinical practice. Additionally, the length of the diaphyseal axis and the extent of radiographic malrotation were measured.

RESULTS

Mean TS on MRI was significantly lower compared to radiographs (4.2° ± 2.9° vs. 9.1° ± 3.6°; p < 0.0001). There was a significant correlation between MRI and PSR (p < 0.0001 with r = 0.7), but not with SLR (p = 0.93 with r = 0.24). Tibial length was a significant predictor for the difference between MRI and SLR (regression coefficient ß = - 0.03; p = 0.035), yet not between MRI and PSR (ß = - 0.003; p = 0.9). Femoral rotation proved to be a significant predictor for the agreement between both observers (PSR: ß = 0.14; p = 0.001 and SLR: ß = 0.08; p = 0.04). ICC indicated a high interrater agreement for the radiographic assessment (ICC ≥ 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a substantial variance between MRI and radiographic measurement of the tibial slope. However, as MRI assessment is time-consuming and requires specialized software, instrumented radiographs might be an alternative. Due care has to be taken to ensure that radiographs contain a sufficient tibial length, and femoral rotation is avoided.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 4.

Should sagittal osteotomy line be parallel to tibial posterior slope in high tibial osteotomy?

BACKGROUND

The reason why the osteotomy line in the sagittal view should be parallel to the medial tibial posterior slope in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) remains unclear. In addition, previous study reported that a posterolateral hinge position led to an increase in tibial posterior slope (TPS) after OWHTO. Our aims were to examine the relationships between angles among the tibial plateau and osteotomy planes or the hinge point and the change in TPS, and the location of the hinge position after OWHTO using three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT). We hypothesized that the sagittal angle between the tibial plateau and osteotomy planes with an anterior-widening proximal tibial fragment resulted in increased TPS, and the hinge position located posterolaterally.

METHODS

Preoperative planning anticipated a weight-bearing line ratio of 62% on the radiograph. The anterior gap was 67% of the posterior gap in OWHTO. We identified the tibial plateau and upper and lower osteotomy planes on 3DCT of 82 patients with symptomatic medial osteoarthritic knee after OWHTO. The osteotomy plane angles between the tibial plateau and upper osteotomy planes, and opening gap angles between both osteotomy planes in the coronal and sagittal views were measured. The anteroposterior (AP) and lateral hinge position was displayed as a percentage on the upper osteotomy plane. We assessed the relationships among them.

RESULTS

The TPS significantly increased after OWHTO (p = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the sagittal osteotomy plane angle and the change in TPS. The sagittal opening gap angle and the AP hinge position ratio were significantly correlated with the change in the TPS (r = 0.477 p < 0.001 and r = - 0.342, p = 0.002, respectively). The hinge position was located a mean of 16.0% from the lateral and 48.6% from the posterior tibial edge in the upper osteotomy plane.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our expectation, the osteotomy plane did not need to be parallel to the tibial plateau plane in the sagittal view. However, the osteotomy gap should be rectangular in the sagittal view. The hinge position located nearly in the center of the sagittal view.

Are three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides for open wedge high tibial osteotomy accurate? An in vitro study

Background

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the accuracy of three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides for open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) to provide the planned correction in both frontal and sagittal planes.

Methods

Ten cadaveric tibias underwent OWHTO performed using a patient-specific cutting guide based on 3D preoperative planning. An initial CT scan of the tibias was performed, and after segmentation, 3D geometrical models of the pre-OWHTO tibias were obtained. Reference planes were defined, and OWHTO virtually planned to then design patient-specific cutting guides. OWHTO were performed using the patient-specific cutting guides. The patient-specific cutting guide controls the cut and the correction of the OWHTO in both planes. 3D models of post-OWHTO tibias were created after a postoperative CT scan. Geometrical post-OWHTO 3D models were superimposed on pre-OWHTO 3D models. Mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) in the frontal plane and posterior tibial slope (PTS) in the sagittal plane were compared between planned-OWHTO and post-OWHTO 3D reconstructions relative to the pre-OWHTO reference planes and axis. Pearson’s and Lin’s correlation tests were performed to assess precision and accuracy of patient-specific cutting guides.

Results

The mean difference between post-OWHTO and planned-OWHTO was 0.2° (max 0.5°, SD 0.3°) in the frontal plane and − 0.1° (max 0.8°, SD 0.5°) in the sagittal plane. Statistically significant correlations were found between the planned-OWHTO and post-OWHTO configurations for the mMPTA (p < 0.0001) and PTS (p < 0.0001) measurements, and the bias correction factor was 0.99 in both planes.

Conclusions

3D patient-specific cutting guides for OWHTO-based 3D virtual planning is a reliable and accurate method of achieving multiplanar correction in both frontal and sagittal planes.

Effect of Increased Coronal Inclination of the Tibial Plateau After Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

PURPOSE

To assess whether the increased inclination of the tibial plateau on the coronal view after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy affects radiographic coronal alignment, clinical outcomes, and cartilage findings.

METHODS

After adjustment for the preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), patients who underwent opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy were retrospectively divided into those with postoperative MPTA values of 95° or less (normal group) and greater than 95° (increased group), with each group containing 43 knees. The 2 groups were compared regarding their arthroscopic cartilage findings at 1 year postoperatively and radiographic coronal alignment and clinical outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Cartilage regeneration in the medial condyles and cartilage deterioration in the lateral condyles were evaluated at the time of second-look arthroscopy. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the American Knee Society knee and function scores, Lysholm knee scoring scale, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

RESULTS

The postoperative anatomic femorotibial angle in the increased group was lower than that in the normal group (P < .001), and the amount of overcorrection in the increased group was higher than that in the normal group (P < .001). The postoperative joint line obliquity in the increased group was higher than that in the normal group (P < .001). Cartilage regeneration in the medial condyles and deterioration in the lateral condyles did not differ significantly on the femoral and tibial sides between the groups. The postoperative American Knee Society knee score and KOOS sports and recreational function subscale score in the normal group were higher than those in the increased group (both P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in the changes in the appearance of the articular surfaces between the 2 groups at 1 year postoperatively. Patients with a postoperative MPTA greater than 95° had more valgus alignment and higher joint line obliquity and had a lower KOOS sports and recreational function subscale score than patients with a postoperative MPTA of 95° or less at 2 years postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Automated Measurement of Patient-Specific Tibial Slopes from MRI

Background: Multi-planar proximal tibial slopes may be associated with increased likelihood of osteoarthritis and anterior cruciate ligament injury, due in part to their role in checking the anterior-posterior stability of the knee. Established methods suffer repeatability limitations and lack computational efficiency for intuitive clinical adoption. The aims of this study were to develop a novel automated approach and to compare the repeatability and computational efficiency of the approach against previously established methods. Methods: Tibial slope geometries were obtained via MRI and measured using an automated Matlab-based approach. Data were compared for repeatability and evaluated for computational efficiency. Results: Mean lateral tibial slope (LTS) for females (7.2°) was greater than for males (1.66°). Mean LTS in the lateral concavity zone was greater for females (7.8° for females, 4.2° for males). Mean medial tibial slope (MTS) for females was greater (9.3° vs. 4.6°). Along the medial concavity zone, female subjects demonstrated greater MTS. Conclusion: The automated method was more repeatable and computationally efficient than previously identified methods and may aid in the clinical assessment of knee injury risk, inform surgical planning, and implant design efforts.

A novel 3D approach for determination of frontal and coronal plane tibial slopes from MR imaging

BACKGROUND

The proximal tibia is geometrically complex, asymmetrical, and variable, is heavily implicated in arthrokinematics of the knee joint, and thus a contributor to knee pathologies such as non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury. Medial, lateral, and coronal tibial slopes are anatomic parameters that may increase predisposition to knee injuries, but the extent to which each contributes has yet to be fully realized. Previously, two-dimensional methods have quantified tibial slopes, but more reliable 3D methods may prove advantageous.

AIMS

(1) to explore the reliability of two-dimensional methods, (2) to introduce a novel three-dimensional measurement approach, and (3) to compare data derived from traditional and novel methods.

METHODS

Medial, lateral, and coronal tibial slope geometry from both knees (left and right) of one subject were obtained via magnetic resonance images and measured by four trained observers from two-dimensional views. The process was repeated via three-dimensional approaches and data evaluated for intra- and inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

The conventional method presented a weaker Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) for the measured slopes (ranging from 0.43 to 0.81) while the resultant ICC for the proposed method indicated greater reliability (ranging from 0.84 to 0.97). Statistical analysis supported the novel approach for production of more reliable and repeatable results for tibial slopes.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel three-dimensional method for calculating tibial plateau slope may be more reliable than previously established methods and may be applicable in assessment of susceptibility to osteoarthritis, as part of anterior cruciate ligament injury risk assessment, and in total knee implant design.

Do ethnicity and gender influence posterior tibial slope?

Background

Ethnicity and gender can affect posterior tibial slope; however, studies on this topic have limitations and are in disagreement. The aim of the present study was to evaluate posterior tibial slope in a large group of consecutive patients, determining whether ethnicity and gender can influence its value. Secondly, to determine intra- and inter-rater reliability of the two radiographic methods adopted.

Materials and methods

Posterior tibial slope was calculated (rater 1) in lateral view X-rays of the knee according to the posterior tibial cortex (PTC) and tibial proximal anatomical axis (TPAA) methods. Data were matched with ethnicity and gender. For determination of intra- and inter-rater reliability, 50 random X-rays were selected, and blindly measured by two other raters (2 and 3).

Results

A total of 581 radiographs were included (413 white and 168 black knees). Comparing white and black subjects, a statistically significant difference was found for both PTC (4.9 ± 1.2 vs 7.1 ± 2.9, p < 0.0001), and for TPAA (7.7 ± 1.1 vs 10.2 ± 3.0, p < 0.0001). In white subjects, an influence of gender was found only for TPAA (6.4 ± 1.1 in males vs 7.6 ± 1.1 in females, p < 0.0001). In black subjects, an influence of gender was found only for PTC (7.4 ± 3.0 in males vs 6.2 ± 2.9 in females, p = 0.01). Intra-rater reliability was good for both methods for rater 1, and very good for rater 2. Inter-rater reliability among the 3 raters was very good for both methods.

Conclusions

Differences in posterior tibial slope between different ethnic groups exist. Differences observed between genders are conflicting and might be too small to have implications in clinical practice. The TPAA method is recommended for the evaluation of posterior tibial slope because of higher intra- and inter-rater reliability.

Level of evidence 3 Case-control study.

Comparative Study of Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With and Without a Combined Computed Tomography-Based and Image-Free Navigation System

PURPOSE

To assess whether a combined computed tomography (CT)-based and image-free navigation system results in better coronal and sagittal alignment than the conventional method for performing opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) and whether CT-based navigation results in acquisition of an accurate osteotomy plane.

METHODS

Sixty-two consecutive knees were randomly divided into navigated and conventional groups. The intraoperative correction angle was determined by the change in hip-knee-ankle angle in the navigated group and by the predicted medial opening width in the conventional group. Outliers of femorotibial angle (FTA) and tibial posterior slope (TPS) were defined as angles of >175° or <165° and angles of >2.5° or <-2.5°, respectively. Radiographic and clinical data were compared between the 2 groups at 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

Mean postoperative FTAs were 168.5° in the navigated group and 168.1° in the conventional group. Mean change in TPS of -0.2° in the navigated group was significantly lower than that of 1.6° in the conventional group (P = .005). On postoperative CT, mean angle between the tibial plateau and osteotomy planes in the sagittal plane showed a significantly higher anterior opening of 12° in the conventional than in the navigated group (P < .001). There was a significantly greater proportion of TPS outliers in the conventional (51.6%) than in the navigated group (12.9%) (P = .001), and a significantly greater proportion within the normal range in both planes in the navigated (74.2%) than in the conventional group (48.4%) (P = .037).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined CT-based and image-free navigation in OWHTO better preserves the original TPS and more frequently restores normal coronal and sagittal plane knee joint alignment. CT-based navigation also enabled acquisition of our target osteotomy plane in the sagittal plan. The navigation system in OWHTO was helpful for simultaneous control of the alignment in 2 planes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, lesser-quality prospective randomized trial.

High tibial osteotomy in varus knees: indications and limits

Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a surgical procedure that aims to correct the weight-bearing axis of the knee, moving the loads laterally from the medial compartment. Conventional indications for OWHTO are medial compartment osteoarthritis and varus malalignment of the knee; recently OWHTO has been used successfully in the treatment of double and triple varus. OWHTO, in contrast to closing wedge high tibial osteotomy, does not require fibular osteotomy or peroneal nerve dissection, or lead to disruption of the proximal tibiofibular joint and bone stock loss. For these reasons, interest in this procedure has grown in recent years. The aim of this study is to review the literature on OWHTO, considering indications and prognostic factors (body mass index, grade of osteoarthritis, instability, range of movement and age), outcomes at mid-term follow-up, and limits of the procedure (slope modifications, patellar height changes and difficulties in conversion to a total knee arthroplasty).