Femoral insertion site of the graft used to replace the medial patellofemoral ligament influences the ligament dynamic changes during knee flexion and the clinical outcome

Outcomes of an All-Soft Tissue Fixation Technique for Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex Using Double-Bundle Quadriceps Tendon Autograft for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation in Skeletally Immature Patients

Background

Patellar fracture, femoral physis injury, and recurrent instability are concerning complications in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (MPFLR) techniques for recurrent patellar dislocation in children and adolescents.

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of an anatomic all-soft tissue fixation technique for reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) using a double-bundle quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft for recurrent patellar dislocation in skeletally immature patients.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

This retrospective study involved 24 skeletally immature patients (24 knees; 16 women and 8 men; age range, 9.5-15 years) with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent MPFC reconstruction using a double-bundle QT autograft between September 2018 and January 2021. Only soft tissue suture fixation was used on the femoral and patellar sides of the 2 bundles of the QT. Radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were used to evaluate physeal status, lower limb alignment, patellar height and tilt, trochlear morphology, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, and any associated knee pathology. Functional outcomes were assessed with the Kujala score, the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and the grading system of Insall et al.22.

Results

The mean follow-up time was 40 ± 9.6 months (range, 28-56 months). At the final follow-up, the Kujala and VAS pain scores showed a significant improvement versus preoperative scores (P < .001), and the passive lateral patellar glide showed a significant reduction (P < .001). All patients had negative apprehension and J signs. Of the 24 patients, 23 regained full range of motion, while 1 patient had a knee flexion deficit. The patellar tilt angle improved significantly at the final follow-up (P < .001). There was no patellar fracture, femoral physis injury, or recurrence of patellar dislocation. According to the grading system of Insall et al, the results were excellent in 15 knees (62.5%), good in 8 knees (33.3%), fair in 1 knee (4.2%), and no knees showed poor results.

Conclusion

Reconstruction of the MPFC using a double-bundle QT autograft with an all-soft tissue fixation technique was an effective method for treating patellar instability in skeletally immature patients.

Stiffness and Instability After MPFL Reconstruction Using a Fluoroscopic Versus Open Technique to Localize the Femoral Attachment Site: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Open and fluoroscopic techniques have been described for localization of the femoral attachment site in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. No study to date has evaluated if one technique is superior to another in terms of complications.

Purpose

To review the literature comparing clinical outcomes of MPFL reconstruction using the fluoroscopic versus open technique to localize the site of femoral graft placement.

Study Design

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed via PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL to identify articles published between the inception of these databases and March 1, 2022, in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. This search yielded 4183 publications for initial review. Studies with at least a 2-year follow-up and complete reporting of patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, recurrent instability, and/or complications (ie, stiffness, infection, persistent pain) were included. We excluded studies of patients with collagen disorders; revision surgeries; surgeries with concomitant procedures; synthetic MPFL reconstruction; MPFL repairs; combined open and radiographic technique; and case series that included <10 patients. A proportional meta-analysis was performed by calculating the pooled estimate of incidence with 95% CIs using a fixed-effects model with double arcsine transformation (Freeman-Tukey) for each type of surgical technique (fluoroscopic or open).

Results

A total of 29 studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 15 studies (566 patients) used the open technique and 14 studies (620 patients) used fluoroscopy. There were no significant differences between the open and fluoroscopic techniques in the incidence of postoperative apprehension (P = .4826), postoperative subjective instability (P = .1095), postoperative objective instability (P = .5583), reoperations (P = .7981), recurrent dislocation (P = .6690), or arthrofibrosis (P = .8118).

Conclusion

Both open and radiographic localization of the femoral graft position in MPFL reconstruction offer similar outcomes and rates of complications.

After MPFL reconstruction, femoral tunnel widening and migration increase with poor tunnel positioning and are related to poor clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Isolated MPFL reconstruction (iMPFLR) is increasingly used for the surgical treatment of treatment for recurrent patella dislocation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tunnel widening and migration on clinical outcomes after iMPFL using a CT-scannographic analysis at 6 months postoperatively.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty patients (91 females for 69 males) with an average age of 23 years [14-54] who underwent iMPFLR and had an evaluation scan at 6 months postoperatively were evaluated with a mean follow-up of 97 ± 89 months [12 to 166]. Functional International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score, Kujala score, and joint mobility were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and at the latest follow-up. The IKDC and Kujala scores were expressed as the difference between pre- and postoperative scores (dIKDC and dKujala). The position of the femoral tunnel was assessed according to the Schöttle criteria on post-operative radiographic profiles. Tunnel widening (at three levels of measurement) and the migration of the center of the tunnel were studied on a CT-scan analysis at 6 months. Any correlation and regression between the evolution of the clinical scores and the measured scannographic parameters were investigated. The relationships between tunnel position and tunnel changes were also studied.

RESULTS

Between pre- and post-op, the IKDC (45 ± 13 to 80 ± 15, p < 0.001) and Kujala (55 ± 11 to 87 ± 12, p < 0.001) scores were significantly improved. Patients with tunnel changes had decreased clinical and functional results at 6 months post-op of an iMPFLR (p < 0.001). These changes in the femoral tunnel, evidenced by a tunnel entrance widening and migration of the tunnel center, were related to an initial malposition of the tunnel (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In iMPFLR, changes in the femoral tunnel, corresponding to dilatation and migration of the tunnel center, may occur. These changes are increased by the initial malpositioning of the femoral tunnel and are correlated with less good clinical and functional outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Revision surgery for failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in better disease-specific outcome scores when performed for recurrent instability than for patellofemoral pain or limited range of motion

PURPOSE

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is an important treatment for recurrent patellar instability. Although complications such as redislocation, patellofemoral pain (PFP) and restricted knee range of motion have been reported, few studies have investigated the results of revision surgery for failed MPFL-R. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the results of the tailored revision surgery after considering the cause of the reconstruction failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2015 and 2019, 28 patients (male/female 9/19; age 26.2 ± 6.4 years) underwent revision surgery for failed MPFL-R. The patients were grouped into the "recurrent instability" (SG1) group and "PFP" and/or "restricted range of motion" (SG2) group. Preoperatively, the clinical data, anatomical risk factor profile, and position of the femoral MPFL tunnel were determined for each patient. The Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and numerical analogue scale (NAS 0-10) were administered preoperatively and at the final follow-up for the subjective assessment of the PFP and knee joint function.

RESULTS

Overall, the BPII 2.0 score improved from 28.8 ± 16.6 points preoperatively to 68.0 ± 22.7 points (p < 0.0001) postoperatively. SG1 exhibited an increase in the BPII 2.0 score from 28.9 ± 20.2 points to 75.7 ± 23 points (p < 0.0001). PFP decreased from 6.8 ± 2.4 to 1.6 ± 1.9 (p < 0.0001), while the knee joint function increased from 4.3 ± 2.5 to 8.8 ± 1.6 (p < 0.0001). In SG2, the BPII 2.0 score increased from 28.7 ± 12.6 points preoperatively to 57.7 ± 19.7 points (p = 0.0002) postoperatively and was thus significantly lower than that in SG1 (p = 0.038). The intensity of PFP decreased from 6.6 ± 3.0 preoperatively to 2.1 ± 1.9 postoperatively (p = 0.0006), while the subjective knee joint function improved from 3.2 ± 1.4 preoperatively to 7.6 ± 2.3 postoperatively (p < 0.0001). The differences between the groups were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Tailored revision surgery for failed MPFL-R significantly improves the patient-reported disease-specific quality of life. The study results indicate that patients undergoing revision surgery as a consequence of patellar redislocation appear to benefit more from revision surgery than those patients undergoing revision due to postoperative PFP and/or a limited knee joint range of motion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Adductor-Transfer and Adductor-Sling at Nonanatomic Femoral Attachment Sites Leads to Unfavorable Graft-Length Change Patterns: A Descriptive Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To compare the graft length change patterns in nonanatomic adductor-transfer (AT) and adductor-sling (AS) medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with those in anatomic MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) and to investigate the favorable isometric ranges (FIRs) of knee flexion.

METHODS

Eight small fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted in a knee-customized jig with tensioned muscles to measure graft length changes from two patellar points to four femoral attachments using a linear variable displacement transducer. Femoral attachments were at the MPFL footprint center (MPFL-C) in anatomic MPFLR, adductor magnus (AM) footprint center (AM-C) in AT, and at 5-mm (AM-5) or 10-mm (AM-10) points proximal to AM-C in AS. The FIRs of these femoral attachments were determined after zeroing the graft length changes at different initial fixation angles.

RESULTS

Anatomic MPFL-C resulted in almost isometric graft length changes from 0° to 90°. At AM-C, the graft length changes displayed an increase from 0° to 45° and significantly greater length changes than those at MPFL-C from 60° to 90°. The graft length changes at both AM-5 and at AM-10 continuously increased with knee flexion angles and presented significantly larger graft length changes than those at MPFL-C and at AM-C from 30° to 90° and 60° to 90°, respectively. After zeroing graft length changes at different fixation angles, the FIRs of the MPFL-C covered all knee flexion angles, regardless of the patellar attachments and initial fixation angles. Moreover, with the smaller FIRs of AM-C observed at any fixation angle when compared with MPFL-C, fixing the graft at 0° to 30° in AT allowed the FIRs to cover the whole functional flexion range. However, the significantly larger graft length changes of both AM-5 and AM-10 resulted in extremely limited FIRs at any fixation angle.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic MPFL-C resulted in a favorable graft length change range (less than 2 mm) at 0° to 90° of knee flexion, which was close to the isometric graft behavior. However, nonanatomic attachments of AM-C in AT, and both AM-5 and AM-10 in AS caused significant anisometric graft length change patterns and limited FIRs. Moreover, AT had a smaller range of graft length change but wider FIRs compared to AS, indicating superior graft behavior for MPFLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Anatomic MPFLR is preferable for the treatment of in skeletally immature patients, followed in preference by nonanatomic AT. Nonanatomic AS should be performed cautiously.

Femoral tunnel malposition is the most common indication for revision medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with promising early outcomes following revision reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify the causes of failure of previous medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R), and to furthermore report the surgical techniques available for MPFL revision surgery.

METHODS

Four databases [PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), Cochrane Database, and EMBASE] were searched until September 29, 2020 for human studies pertaining to revision MPFL. Two reviewers screened the literature independently and in duplicate. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria, or the CAse REport guidelines (CARE), where appropriate.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (one level II, one level III, two level IV, ten level V) were identified. This search resulted in a total of 76 patients with a mean age (range) of 22 (14-39) years. The patients were 75% female with a mean (range) time to revision of 24.1 (1-60) months and mean (range) follow-up of 36.2 (2-48) months. The most common indication for revision surgery was malpositioning of the femoral tunnel (38.1%), unaddressed trochlear dysplasia (18.4%), patellar fracture (11.8%). Femoral tunnel malposition was typically treated via revision MPFL-R with quadriceps tendon or semitendinosus autograft and may retain the primary graft if fixation points were altered. Unaddressed trochlear dysplasia was treated with deepening trochleoplasty with or without revision MPFL-R, and patella fracture according to the nature of the fracture pattern and bone quality. Though generally, outcomes in the revision scenario across all indications were inferior to those post-primary procedure, overall, revision patients demonstrated positive improvements in pain and instability symptoms. Transverse patella fractures treated with debridement and filling with demineralized bone matrix if required with further fixation according to the fracture pattern.

CONCLUSION

The most common causes of MPFL failure in literature published to date, in order of decreasing frequency, are: malposition of the femoral tunnel, unaddressed trochlear dysplasia, and patellar fracture. Although surgical techniques of revision MPFL-R to manage these failures were varied, promising outcomes have been reported to date. Larger prospective comparative studies would be useful to clarify optimal surgical management of MPFL-R failure at long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Elongation and orientation pattern of the medial patellofemoral ligament during lunging

Unfavorable clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, such as early osteoarthritis of the patellofemoral joint, were considered to be associate with tunnel malpositioning. Length change studies have found that small changes in the femoral position can cause great changes in elongation trends. Further studying the MPFL kinematics may help us to understand the consequences of tunnel malpositioning and optimize the reconstruction techniques. Fifteen healthy subjects were studied with a combined computed tomography and biplane fluoroscopic imaging technique during a lunge motion. Five femoral and three patellar attachments were used to simulate different MPFL bundles. Kinematics of MPFL was defined as elongation and orientation changes (i.e., deviation angle and elevation angle). The mean deviation angle was 28.7° (95% confidence interval, 28.0°-29.4°) at full extension and remained nearly unchanged up to 60° of flexion, and increased to 56.5° (54.1°-58.9°) at 110°. The elevation angle decreased linearly from 12.6° (9.3°-15.9°) at full extension to -86.2° (-92.7-79.7°) at 110° of flexion. The MPFL was most stretched anteriorly and laterally relative to femur from full extension to 30° of flexion and remained near isometric beyond 30°. The current study found that proximal and anterior femoral attachments caused excessive lateral stretching of the MPFL at deeper flexion angles. Such abnormal MPFL kinematics may subsequently cause overconstraint and increased cartilage pressures of the medial patellofemoral joint.

[Research progress in femoral tunnel positioning points of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.

Methods

The literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.

Results

The accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.

Comparison of Ligament Isometry and Patellofemoral Contact Pressures for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients

BACKGROUND

Adult medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction techniques are not appropriate for the skeletally immature patient given the proximity of the distal femoral physis. Biomechanical consequences of reconstructions aimed at avoiding the physis have not been adequately studied.

PURPOSE

To quantify the biomechanical effects of MPFL reconstruction techniques intended for skeletally immature patients.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Four MPFL reconstruction techniques were evaluated using a computationally augmented cadaveric model: (1) Schoettle point: adult-type reconstruction; (2) epiphyseal: socket distal to the femoral physis; (3) adductor sling: graft wrapped around the adductor tendon; (4) adductor transfer: adductor tendon transferred to patella. A custom testing frame was used to cycle 8 knees for each technique from 10° to 110° of flexion. Patellofemoral kinematics were recorded using a motion camera system, contact stresses were recorded using Tekscan pressure sensors, and MPFL length was computed using an inverse kinematics computational model. Change in MPFL length, patellar facet forces, and patellar kinematics were compared using generalized estimating equation modeling.

RESULTS

Schoettle point reconstruction was the most isometric, demonstrating isometry from 10° to 100°. The epiphyseal technique was isometric until 60°, after which the graft loosened with increasing flexion. The adductor sling and adductor transfer techniques were significantly more anisometric from 40° to 110°. Both grafts tightened with knee flexion and resulted in significantly more lateral patellar tilt versus the intact state in early flexion and significantly higher contact forces on the medial facet versus the epiphyseal technique in late flexion.

CONCLUSION

In this cadaveric simulation, the epiphyseal technique allowed for a more isometric ligament until midflexion, when the patella engaged within the trochlear groove. The adductor sling and adductor transfer grafts became tighter in flexion, resulting in potential loss of motion, pain, graft stretching, and failure. Marginal between-condition differences in patellofemoral contact mechanics and patellar kinematics were observed in late flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In the skeletally immature patient, using an epiphyseal type MPFL reconstruction with the femoral attachment site distal to the physis results in a more isometric graft compared with techniques with attachment sites proximal to the physis.

[Optimization location of femoral attachment in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction assisted with arthroscopy for patellar dislocation]

Objective

To investigate the technique of optimizing the location of femoral attachment in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction assisted with arthroscopy and evaluate the effectiveness.

Methods

Between January 2014 and September 2018, 35 patients with patellar dislocation were admitted. There were 14 males and 21 females with an average age of 22.6 years (range, 16-38 years). All patients had a history of knee sprain. The disease duration ranged from 1 to 7 days (mean, 2.8 days). Patellar dislocation occurred 2-4 times (mean, 2.5 times). The preoperative Lysholm score and Kujala score were 47.60±11.24 and 48.37±9.79, respectively. The patellar congruence angle was (31.40±6.81)°, the patellar tilt angle was (29.95±5.44)°, the lateral patellofemoral angle was (-11.46±5.18)°, and the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance was (16.66±1.28) mm. All patients were treated by MPFL reconstruction with the semitendinosus tendon under arthroscopy. During operation, the suture anchors were inserted into the midpoint and the 1/3 point of superomedial edge of the patella. Then, the femoral tunnels were created in medial femoral condyle through limited excision. For tendon fixation, the Kirschner wires were inserted into adductor tubercle, medial epicondyle of femur, and the midpoint between the two points, as well as the anteriorly and posteriorly. Afterwards, the changes of ligament length and tension, patellar tracking, and the relationship of patella and femoral trochlea were evaluated, thereby determining the optimized femoral attachment for MPFL reconstruction. Finally, the patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, and lateral patellofemoral angle were measured by imaging to assess the relationship of patella and femoral trochlea. Moreover, Lysholm score and Kujala score were used to evaluate the knee joint function.

Results

All incisions healed by first intention without infection. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 15.4 months). At 12 months, the Lysholm score was 94.40±3.99 and the Kujala score was 92.28±4.13, which were significant higher than those before operation ( P<0.05). No patellar dislocation occurred during follow-up. At 12 months, the patellar congruence angle was (6.57±4.59)°, the patellar tilt angle was (9.73±2.82)°, the lateral patellofemoral angle was (7.14±4.63)°, which were superior to those before operation ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

During the MPFL reconstruction under arthroscopy, a higher positioning accuracy for the femoral attachment and satisfactory effectiveness can be obtained by evaluating MPFL length and tension, patellofemoral joint kinematics, and patellar tracking.

Combined medial patellofemoral and patellotibial reconstruction with soft tissue fixation in recurrent patellar dislocation

INTRODUCTION

The medial patellofemoral and patellotibial ligaments (MPFL and MPTL) are the main passive restraints to lateral patellar translation. When nonoperative management of patellofemoral dislocations fails, surgical options can be considered to restore patellofemoral stability. Several reconstruction procedures of the MPFL with semitendinosus, gracilis, quadriceps tendon, and synthetic grafts have been described. No clear superiority of one surgical technique over another is evident.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who suffered at least two documented episodes of unilateral patellar dislocation, confirmed radiographically and at clinical examination, underwent combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction. Patients were regularly followed-up postoperatively at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, and then annually for a minimum of 2.5 years. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed using the modified Cincinnati rating system and the Kujala score, while anthropometry values including thigh volume and cross-sectional area of the thigh were measured before the operation and at the latest follow-up bilaterally.

RESULTS

There were 7 males and 27 females with a mean age of 26.5 ± 10.7 years (range, 13-39 years). The mean follow-up was 3.1 years (range, 2.5-4 years). The mean modified Cincinnati score Increased from 51 ± 22 preoperatively to 90 ± 19 (P = .001). The mean Kujala scores increased from 47 ± 17 preoperatively to 82 ± 17 (P = .02), with no significant differences between patients with or without osteochondral lesions (P ≥ .05), and between male and female patients (P ≥ .08). The Insall-Salvati index was 1.1 preoperatively and remained within normal range (P = .05) at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Combined reconstruction of MPFL and MPTL using an ipsilateral autologous gracilis tendon is satisfactory and effective and can be considered as suitable management option to treat recurrent dislocation of the patella. However, randomized studies are needed to compare different techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

Dynamic-Anatomical Reconstruction of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament in Open Physis

Patellar dislocation is a common knee problem, 10 times more frequent in childhood and adolescence. Medial patellofemoral ligament is injured up to 94% of the time, and its reconstruction is effective in terms of stabilization of the patella. However, distal femoral physis can be damaged with different techniques of reconstruction, due to the location of the femoral footprint. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe a quasi-anatomical and dynamic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament, using no tunnel in the femur, passing the graft behind the adductor tendon, and fixing it with one tunnel in the patella and one passage through the quadriceps tendon.

Failure Analysis in Patients With Patellar Redislocation After Primary Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become a popular surgical procedure to address patellofemoral instability. As a consequence of the growing number of MPFL reconstructions performed, a higher rate of failures and revision procedures has been seen.

Purpose:

To perform a failure analysis in patients with patellar redislocation after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Patients undergoing revision surgery for reinstability after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction were included. Clinical notes were reviewed to collect demographic data, information on the primary surgery, and the mechanism of patellar redislocation (traumatic vs nontraumatic). Preoperative imaging was analyzed regarding femoral tunnel position and the prevalence of anatomic risk factors (ARFs) associated with patellofemoral instability: trochlear dysplasia (types B through D), patella alta (Caton-Deschamps index >1.2, patellotrochlear index <0.28), lateralization of the tibial tuberosity (tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance >20 mm, tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament [TT-PCL] distance >24 mm), valgus malalignment (mechanical valgus axis >5°), and torsional deformity (internal femoral torsion >25°, external tibial torsion >35°). The prevalence of ARF was compared between patients with traumatic and nontraumatic redislocations and between patients with anatomic and nonanatomic femoral tunnel position.

Results:

A total of 26 patients (69% female) with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years were included. The cause of redislocation was traumatic in 31% and nontraumatic in 69%. Position of the femoral tunnel was considered nonanatomic in 50% of patients. Trochlear dysplasia was the most common ARF with a prevalence of 50%, followed by elevated TT-PCL distance (36%) and valgus malalignment (35%). The median number of ARFs per patient was 3 (range, 0-6), and 65% of patients had 2 or more ARFs. Patients with nontraumatic redislocations showed significantly more ARFs per patient, and the presence of 2 or more ARFs was significantly more common in this group. No significant difference was observed between patients with anatomic versus nonanatomic femoral tunnel position.

Conclusion:

Multiple anatomic risk factors and femoral tunnel malposition are commonly observed in patients with reinstability after primary MPFL reconstruction. Before revision surgery, a focused clinical examination and adequate imaging including radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standing full-leg radiographs, and torsional measurement with computed tomography or MRI are recommended to assess all relevant anatomic parameters to understand an individual patient’s risk profile. During revision surgery, care must be taken to ensure anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel through use of anatomic and/or radiographic landmarks.

Validity of intraoperative observation of graft length change pattern for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

Background

The clinical outcome of the medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) based on graft length change pattern (length pattern group) was compared with MPFLR based on visual examination combined with palpation (visual/palpation group).

Methods

Physical findings, patient-reported outcome, and radiographic demonstration were evaluated pre- and postoperatively.

Results

The length pattern group had significantly lower risk of a positive apprehension test (Odds ratio 0.12, p < 0.01), and higher scores in postoperative Lysholm score (p = 0.046) and patient satisfaction (p = 0.036) than The visual/palpation group.

Conclusion

MPFLR based on graft length change pattern improved on patient-reported outcomes and apprehension test.

Level of evidence

Level Ⅲ, Retrospective comparative study.

Fluoroscopic guided tunnel placement during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is not accurate in patients with severe trochlear dysplasia

PURPOSE

Accurate femoral tunnel placement is of great importance during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of trochlear dysplasia on the accuracy of fluoroscopic guided femoral tunnel placement.

METHODS

CT-Scans of 30 knees (five with regular shaped trochlea, 10 with a Type A and five each with a Type B, C, or D trochlear dysplasia) were imported into the image analysis platform MeVisLab. A 3D Bone Volume Rendering (VR) and a virtual lateral radiograph was created. The anatomic femoral MPFL insertion was identified on the 3D VR. On virtual lateral radiographs, the MPFL insertion was identified based on landmarks described by Schöttle et al. using three different perspectives: Best possible overlap of the femoral condyles (BC) and a tangent along posterior border of the posterior femoral cortex (pBC); a tangent along the anterior border of the posterior cortex (aBC); and best possible overlap of the distal part of the posterior femoral cortex (BF). Distances between the anatomic attachment and radiographically obtained insertions were measured on the 3D VR and compared according to the type of trochlear dysplasia.

RESULTS

Significantly lower accuracy of fluoroscopy guided tunnel placement in MPFL reconstruction was found in knees with Type C and D dysplasia. This effect was observed irrespectively from the radiologic perspective (pBC, aBC, and FC). In the pBC view (highest accuracy), the mean distance from the centre of the anatomic MPFL attachment to the radiographically defined location was 4.3 mm in knees without trochlear dysplasia and increased to 4.8 mm in knees with Type A dysplasia, 3.8 mm in knees with Type B dysplasia, 6.7 mm (p < 0.001) in knees with Type C dysplasia, and 7.3 mm (p < 0.001) in knees with Type D dysplasia.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic landmark-based femoral tunnel placement in the pBC view provides highest accuracy in knees with a normal shaped trochlea or low grade trochlear dysplasia. In patients with severe dysplasia, fluoroscopy guided tunnel placement has a low accuracy, exceeding a critical threshold of 5 mm distance to the anatomic MPFL insertion irrespective of the radiographic perspective. In these patients, utilization of anatomic landmarks may be beneficial.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Clinical and radiological results after one hundred fifteen MPFL reconstructions with or without tibial tubercle transfer in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation-a mean follow-up of 5.4 years

PURPOSE

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) shows low recurrent rates and high satisfaction. Reports on outcome at mid-term follow-up in a large cohort with or without tibial tubercle transfer (TTT) are scarce.

METHODS

One hundred six patients (115 knees; 24.3 ± 8.7 years) with recurrent patellar dislocation underwent MPFLR with ipsilateral gracilis autograft and were included in this retrospective follow-up study. In 43 knees, simultaneous TTT was performed for patellar maltracking due to patella alta or increased tibial tubercle trochlear groove distance (TT-TG). Kujala and subjective knee scores were recorded pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven percent of the patients were satisfied at a mean follow-up of 5.4 ± 3.1 years. The Kujala score increased in 81.7% of all knees from 50.9 to 76.2 points (p < 0.01). Patients with a decreased Kujala score were not different in terms of follow-up time, age, trochlear dysplasia, or post-operative patellar height. The decline was related to an increase in pain, whereas functional scores remained identical. There were six patients with persisting instability, three with patellar re-dislocation. Re-operation was necessary in 24 patients (21.2%), mainly for implant removal after TTT and loss of flexion. Performing TTT had no significant influence on the subjective outcome. Patients with more than eight years of follow-up (n = 27) did not show any difference in the subjective outcome parameters, or in osteoarthritis progression.

CONCLUSION

MPFLR with and without TTT is a reliable treatment option for recurrent patellar dislocation without deterioration at mid-term follow-up. Persisting pain is a major post-operative issue that seems to be unrelated to patellofemoral anatomy.

Evaluation of Patellar Contact Pressure Changes after Static versus Dynamic Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstructions Using a Finite Element Model

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of various medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) fixation techniques on patellar pressure compared with the native knee.

METHODS

A finite element model of the patellofemoral joint consisting of approximately 30,700 nodes and 22,200 elements was created from computed tomography scans of 24 knees with chronic lateral patellar instability. Patellar contact pressures and maximum MPFL graft stress at five positions of flexion (0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°) were analyzed in three types of MPFL reconstruction (MPFLr): (1) static/anatomic, (2) dynamic, using the adductor magnus tendon (AMT) as the femoral fixation, and (3) dynamic, using the quadriceps tendon as the attachment (medial quadriceps tendon-femoral ligament (MQTFL) reconstruction).

RESULTS

In the static/anatomic technique, the patellar contact pressures at 0° and 30° were greater than in the native knee. As in a native knee, the contact pressures at 60°, 90°, and 120° were very low. The maximum MPFL graft stress at 0° and 30° was greater than in a native knee. However, the MPFL graft was loose at 60°, 90°, and 120°, meaning it had no tension. In the dynamic MPFLr using the AMT as a pulley, the patellar contact pressures were like those of a native knee throughout the entire range of motion. However, the maximum stress of the MPFL graft at 0° was less than that of a native ligament. Yet, the maximum MPFL graft stress was greater at 30° than in a native ligament. After 30° of flexion, the MPFL graft loosened, similarly to a native knee. In the dynamic MQTFL reconstruction, the maximum patellar contact pressure was slightly greater than in a normal knee. The maximum stress of the MPFL graft was much greater at 0° and 30° than that of a native MPFL. After 30° of flexion, the MQPFL graft loosened just as in the native knee.

CONCLUSIONS

The patellar contact pressures after the dynamic MPFLr were like those of the native knee, whereas a static reconstruction resulted in greater pressures, potentially increasing the risk of patellofemoral osteoarthritis in the long term. Therefore, the dynamic MPFLr might be a safer option than a static reconstruction from a biomechanical perspective.

An Updated Overview of the Anatomy and Function of the Proximal Medial Patellar Restraints (Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and the Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament)

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been widely accepted to function as "the primary static restraint to lateral patellar displacement." However, current growing evidence suggests that there is a complex of medial patellofemoral/tibial ligaments, both proximal [MPFL, and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL)], and distal (medial patellotibial ligament and the medial patellomeniscal ligament) which restrain lateral patellar translation at different degrees of knee flexion. Specifically, the MQTFL has gained popularity over the last decade because of pure soft tissue attachments into the extensor mechanism that allow for avoidance of drilling tunnels into the patella during reconstruction. The purpose of this article was to report on the current knowledge (anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, indications for surgery, and techniques) on the proximal medial patellar restraints, namely the MPFL and the MQTFL, collectively referred to as the proximal medial patellar restraints.

Parametric finite element model of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction model development and clinical validation

Background

Currently, there is uncertainty regarding the long-term outcome of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstructions (MPFLr). Our objectives were: (1) to develop a parametric model of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) enabling us to simulate different surgical techniques for MPFLr; (2) to determine the negative effects on the PFJ associated with each technique, which could be related to long-term deterioration of the PFJ.

Methods

A finite element model of the PFJ was created based on CT data from 24 knees with chronic lateral patellar instability. Patella contact pressure and maximum MPFL-graft stress at five angles of knee flexion (0, 30, 60, 90 and 120°) were analysed in three types of MPFLr: anatomic, non-anatomic with physiometric behaviour, and non-anatomic with non-physiometric behaviour.

Results

An increase in patella contact pressure was observed at 0 and 30° of knee flexion after both anatomic and non-anatomic MPFLr with physiometric behaviour. In both reconstructions, the ligament was tense between 0 and 30° of knee flexion, but at 60, 90 and 120°, it had no tension. In the third reconstruction, the behaviour was completely the opposite.

Conclusion

A parametric model of the PFJ enables us to evaluate different types of MPFLr throughout the full range of motion of the knee, regarding the effect on the patellofemoral contact pressure, as well as the kinematic behaviour of the MPFL-graft and the maximum MPFL-graft stress.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40634-019-0200-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Is a Dynamic and Anisometric Structure: An In Vivo Study on Length Changes and Isometry

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is associated with a high rate of complications, including recurrent instability and persistent knee pain. Technical errors are among the primary causes of these complications. Understanding the effect of adjusting patellofemoral attachments on length change patterns may help surgeons to optimize graft placement during MPFL reconstruction and to reduce graft failure rates.

PURPOSE

To determine the in vivo length changes of the MPFL during dynamic, weightbearing motion and to map the isometry of the 3-dimensional wrapping paths from various attachments on the medial femoral epicondyle to the patella.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy participants were studied with a combined computed tomography and biplane fluoroscopic imaging technique during a lunge motion (full extension to ~110° of flexion). On the medial femoral epicondyle, 185 attachments were projected, including the anatomic MPFL footprint, which was divided into 5 attachments (central, proximal, distal, posterior, and anterior). The patellar MPFL area was divided into 3 possible attachments (proximal, central, and distal). The length changes of the shortest 3-dimensional wrapping paths of the various patellofemoral combinations were subsequently measured and mapped.

RESULTS

For the 3 patellar attachments, the most isometric attachment, with an approximate 4% length change, was located posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment, close to the adductor tubercle. Attachments proximal and anterior to the isometric area resulted in increasing lengths with increasing knee flexion, whereas distal and posterior attachments caused decreasing lengths with increasing knee flexion. The anatomic MPFL was tightest in extension, decreased in length until approximately 30° of flexion, and then stayed near isometric for the remainder of the motion. Changing both the femoral and patellar attachments significantly affected the length changes of the anatomic MPFL ( P < .001 for both).

CONCLUSION

The most isometric location for MPFL reconstruction was posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment. The anatomic MPFL is a dynamic, anisometric structure that was tight in extension and early flexion and near isometric beyond 30° of flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Proximal and anterior MPFL tunnel positioning should be avoided, and the importance of anatomic MPFL reconstruction is underscored with the results found in this study.

Middle-to long-term outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with Insall's proximal realignment for patellar instability

Background

Recently, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has become a common, widely used procedure to treat patellar instability. However, few reports exist on the long-term outcome after MPFL reconstruction. We elucidated the middle- to long-term outcome after MPFL reconstruction with Insall’s proximal realignment. Methods: From 1999 to 2012, 42 knees of 32 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction with Insall’s proximal realignment were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of five years. Patients who could visit our office and receive some designated examinations were included in this study. The re-dislocation rate and patellar apprehension sign postoperatively were evaluated. The Kujala score and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) were calculated. We assessed the images using plane x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The tilting angle (TA), congruence angle (CA), and lateral shift ratio (LSR) on the plane x-ray were measured pre- and postoperatively and at final follow-up. Using MRI, osteochondral lesions at the patellofemoral joint were evaluated.

Results

A total of 20 knees of 15 patients (two male, 13 female) who could visit our office were studied. The follow-up rate was 47.6%. The mean age at operation was 19.9 (11–41) years and mean follow-up was 123 (60–215) months. One knee (5.5%) had a history of postoperative subluxation, and five (25%) had a positive apprehension sign. The mean Kujala score significantly improved from 65.5 to 86.1 points (P < 0.05). The mean KOOS (symptom, pain, activities of daily living [ADL], sports, quality of life [QOL]) was 74.4, 92.4, 97.3, 84.1, and 73.2 points, respectively, at final follow-up. On the plane x-ray, patellofemoral alignment was improved postoperatively, and this improvement was maintained at final follow-up. On MRI, in five of 20 cases, the patellofemoral osteoarthritic change was observed at final follow-up. However, in four of these five knees with severe osteochondral lesions, osteochondral fixation or transplantation surgery had been performed. Only one of the remaining 15 knees had a patellofemoral osteoarthritic change observed at final follow-up.

Conclusion

Middle- to long-term outcome after MPFL reconstruction with Insall’s proximal realignment at our institution was evaluated, and good clinical results were observed. Most patients who did not have a severe cartilage lesion preoperatively did not develop osteoarthritic change.

Comparation and evaluation of the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the medial patellofemoral ligament femoral tunnel: a cadaveric and clinical study

Background

In anatomic medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, malpositioning of the MPFL femoral tunnel is common. A palpable sulcus reportedly exists at the anatomic femoral attachment of the MPFL. The present study aimed to investigate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the MPFL femoral tunnel.

Methods

A cadaveric study was first done on 12 knees to evaluate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method to establish the entry points of the MPFL femoral tunnel in comparison with the midpoint and fluoroscopic localization methods. The center of the native MPFL femoral attachment was served as the reference in the cadaveric study. A clinical study was then performed to further evaluate the accuracy of the sulcus localization method in 53 patients (60 knees). Schöttle’s point was served as the reference in the clinical study. Femoral tunnel placement was defined as accurate when it was less than 5 mm from Schöttle’s point. In both the cadaveric and clinical studies, MPFL femoral tunnel placement was assessed on postoperative reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images. In the cadaveric study, the accuracy of different localization methods was compared using analysis of variance.

Results

In the cadaveric study, the mean distances from the native MPFL attachment to the femoral tunnel entry point were 4.2 ± 1.0 mm (range 2.4–5.6 mm), 4.4 ± 1.4 mm (range 1.8–6.6 mm) and 2.9 ± 0.8 mm (range 1.9–4.4 mm) using the midpoint, fluoroscopic, and sulcus localization methods, respectively; this distance significantly differed between the midpoint and sulcus localization methods, and between the fluoroscopic and sulcus localization methods (p ≤ .05). While there were no significant differences between the midpoint and fluoroscopic localization methods (n.s.). In the clinical study, the mean distance between the femoral tunnel and Schöttle’s point was 3.5 ± 1.5 mm (range 0.4–6.1 mm), with accurate tunnel placement achieved in 49 of 60 cases (82%).

Conclusion

The sulcus localization method can accurately guide MPFL femoral tunnel placement. This method might be useful for orthopedic surgeons.

Level of evidence

IV

[Influencing factors of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar dislocation]

Objective

To review the influencing factors of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar dislocation.

Methods

The literature of MPFL reconstruction for patellar dislocation at home and abroad in recent years were summarized and analyzed.

Results

The influencing factors such as the location of the femoral insertion point, the tension and the fixed angle of the grafts, the dysplasia of the femoral trochlear before operation, the abnormal tuberositas tibiae-trochlear groove value, the high position of the patellar, and the tilting angle of the patellar, are all the factors affecting the effectiveness of MPLF reconstruction.

Conclusion

During MPFL reconstruction, the surgical techniques and elimination of other factors that caused patellar instability need to be focused in order to reduce the complications and operation failure.

The Relationship of Femoral Tunnel Positioning in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction on Clinical Outcome and Postoperative Complications

PURPOSE

To analyze the relation of the femoral tunnel (FT) positioning on clinical outcome.

METHODS

Patients with recurrent patellar dislocation who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with or without tibial tubercle osteotomy between 1998 and 2012 were included in this retrospective study. Strict postoperative lateral radiographs were mandatory. Knees with previous osseous stabilization surgery, fixed lateral patellar dislocation, valgus knee (>5°), or open growth plates were excluded. The distance between the FT and the validated radiographic landmark (the "Schoettle point") was measured. An FT with a distance greater than 10 mm was considered as malpositioned. The distance was correlated to subjective outcome measurements (patient satisfaction and Kujala score) and postoperative complications (a loss of range of motion and revision surgery).

RESULTS

Sixty-three knees in 60 patients (aged 23.7 ± 7.5 years at the time of surgery, 79.4% female) were included with a mean follow-up of 5.7 ± 3.3 years. The FT showed an average distance of 13.3 mm (±6.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.7-14.8) to the Schoettle point, and 45 of 63 knees (71.4%) were deemed malpositioned. The postoperative Kujala score of malpositioned FT (75.9 points; 95% CI: 71.2-80.7) was not significantly inferior to knees with an FT within 10 mm (80.5; 95% CI: 73.7-87.3, P = .315). However, all 5 knees that underwent revision surgery showed an FT outside the 10-mm area.

CONCLUSIONS

Malpositioning of the FT in MPFL reconstruction is associated with postoperative complications. However, a malpositioned FT in MPFL reconstruction will not necessarily lead to an unsatisfactory subjective or objective clinical outcome. Other factors, such as surgical indication or graft tensioning, might also significantly influence postoperative outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case-control study.

Length change patterns and shape of a grafted tendon after anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction differs from that in a healthy knee

PURPOSE

Recurrent patellar dislocation is currently treated with anatomical reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), and favourable postoperative outcomes have been reported. However, it is uncertain if healthy MPFL function is restored by anatomical reconstruction. The hypothesis in this study was that stabilization of the patella following MPFL reconstruction would be improved compared with that before surgery, but that function of the grafted tendon would differ from that of a healthy MPFL. The objective was to analyse the length change patterns of the MPFL before surgery and the grafted tendon after surgery in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation treated with anatomical MPFL reconstruction.

METHODS

The subjects were 12 patients (13 knees) in whom recurrent patellar dislocation was treated with anatomical MPFL reconstruction. The length change patterns of the MPFL and reconstructed ligament were analysed at extension and flexion of the knee joint using open MRI.

RESULTS

The postoperative grafted tendon length was significantly shorter than that of the preoperative MPFL at knee extension, and significantly longer at 90° and 120° of knee flexion. The postoperative length of the grafted tendon only changed slightly from 0° to 30° of knee flexion, and then significantly decreased at flexion of 30° or more. The morphology of the grafted tendon was linear until 60° knee flexion, but became convex toward the extraarticular side at flexion of 90° or more.

CONCLUSION

The grafted tendon length at knee extension was shorter than that of the preoperative MPFL, but there was no significant difference at 30° flexion. These findings suggest that the effect of damping of the patella with a grafted tendon after MPFL reconstruction may differ from that in a healthy knee. In addition, the morphology at 60° knee flexion was improved to linear after surgery, suggesting that ligament morphology at this flexion was normalized by MPFL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The trochlear isometric point is different in patients with recurrent patellar instability compared to controls: a radiographical study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to investigate the theoretical isometric point based of the curve of the femoral groove and relating it to the origin of the MPFL femoral tunnel on lateral radiograph by comparing a patellar instability cohort with a control cohort.

METHODS

From a Patellar Instability database the radiographs of 40 consecutive patients were analysed to define Schöttle's point, and the arc of the circle of the trochlear groove. A comparison population of 20 radiographs from comparable patients with tibiofemoral joint disorders was used as a control. The distance from Schöttle's point to the most anterior part of the groove (extension) was also compared to the distance to the distal end of the roof of the notch (flexion).

RESULTS

The trochlea was circular in the controls but not the Patellofemoral Instability cohort where trochlear dysplasia is usually present. The difference between the extension and flexion length was a mean of - 2.0 ± 0.5 mm in the controls and + 6.0 ± 0.5 mm in the patellofemoral cohort. In neither cohort did the centre of the circle correspond to Schöttle's point. The extension distance correlated with the boss height.

CONCLUSIONS

The dysplastic trochlea is not circular and the centre of the best matched circle was different to the control trochleae which were circular. The circle centres did not correlate with Schöttle's point for either cohort, and was more proximal in the Patellofemoral Instability cohort.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

For the MPFL to have equal tension throughout flexion within the groove, the length should not change. In normal knees the MPFL does not behave isometrically. The change in length, as measured from Schöttle's point to the trochlea, was greater for patellofemoral instability patients explaining why an isolated MPFL reconstruction in the presence of severe trochlear dysplasia risks poor outcomes. Level of evidence III.

Origin and insertion of the medial patellofemoral ligament: a systematic review of anatomy

PURPOSE

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the major medial soft-tissue stabiliser of the patella, originating from the medial femoral condyle and inserting onto the medial patella. The exact position reported in the literature varies. Understanding the true anatomical origin and insertion of the MPFL is critical to successful reconstruction. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine these locations.

METHODS

A systematic search of published (AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) and unpublished literature databases was conducted from their inception to the 3 February 2016. All papers investigating the anatomy of the MPFL were eligible. Methodological quality was assessed using a modified CASP tool. A narrative analysis approach was adopted to synthesise the findings.

RESULTS

After screening and review of 2045 papers, a total of 67 studies investigating the relevant anatomy were included. From this, the origin appears to be from an area rather than (as previously reported) a single point on the medial femoral condyle. The weighted average length was 56 mm with an 'hourglass' shape, fanning out at both ligament ends.

CONCLUSION

The MPFL is an hourglass-shaped structure running from a triangular space between the adductor tubercle, medial femoral epicondyle and gastrocnemius tubercle and inserts onto the superomedial aspect of the patella. Awareness of anatomy is critical for assessment, anatomical repair and successful surgical patellar stabilisation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of anatomical dissections and imaging studies, Level IV.

Radiographic Location Does Not Ensure a Precise Anatomic Location of the Femoral Fixation Site in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

A frequently used method to determine the anatomic femoral fixation point in the operating room during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the radiographic method. However, the ability of this radiological method to establish an anatomic femoral attachment point might not be as accurate as expected.

Purpose:

(1) To evaluate the accuracy of the radiological method to locate the anatomic femoral fixation point in MPFL reconstruction surgery and (2) to determine the factors influencing the predictability of this method to obtain this objective.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

A total of 100 consecutive 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) knee examinations were performed at 0° of extension in 87 patients treated for chronic lateral patellar instability. For each knee, 2 virtual 7 mm–diameter femoral tunnels were created: 1 using the adductor tubercle as a landmark (anatomic tunnel) and the other according to the radiological method described by Schöttle et al (radiographic tunnel). We measured the percentage of overlap between both tunnels. Moreover, of the 100 included knees, 10 were randomly selected for a variability study.

Results:

Considering an overlap area greater than 50% as reasonable, the radiographic method achieved this in only 38 of the 100 knees. Intrarater and interrater reliability were excellent. There was a trend for female patients with severe trochlear dysplasia to have less overlap. This model accounted for 64.2% of the initial variability in the data.

Conclusion:

An exact anatomic femoral tunnel placement could not be achieved with the radiographic method. Radiography provided only an approximation and should not be the sole basis for the femoral attachment location. Moreover, in female patients with severe trochlear dysplasia, the radiographic method was less accurate in determining the anatomic femoral fixation point, although differences were not statistically significant.

Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament

Patellar instability has been shown to be associated with different major factors. However, studies have demonstrated that soft tissue reconstructions are adequate enough to reestablish patellar constraint. In recent years, the medial patellofemoral ligament has been recognized as the primary passive restraint for lateral translation of the patella. Their reconstruction has gain popularity as the procedure is quite simple and fast. Although several surgical techniques have been described for their reconstruction, no clear consensus has been reached as to which is best. We present an implant-free, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction technique that uses a gracilis tendon autograft, 2 bone convergent tunnels at the original patellar attachment, and looping the graft around the adductor magnus tendon that is used as a pulley for femoral fixation.

Failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: Causes and surgical strategies

Patellar instability is a common clinical problem encountered by orthopedic surgeons specializing in the knee. For patients with chronic lateral patellar instability, the standard surgical approach is to stabilize the patella through a medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction. Foreseeably, an increasing number of revision surgeries of the reconstructed MPFL will be seen in upcoming years. In this paper, the causes of failed MPFL reconstruction are analyzed: (1) incorrect surgical indication or inappropriate surgical technique/patient selection; (2) a technical error; and (3) an incorrect assessment of the concomitant risk factors for instability. An understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics of the MPFL and cautiousness with the imaging techniques while favoring clinical over radiological findings and the use of common sense to determine the adequate surgical technique for each particular case, are critical to minimizing MPFL surgery failure. Additionally, our approach to dealing with failure after primary MPFL reconstruction is also presented.

How to Deal With Anterior Knee Pain in the Active Young Patient

Context:

Anterior knee pain (AKP) represents the most common reason to consult with a clinician who specializes in the knee. Despite the high incidence of the disorder, however, its etiology is still controversial. Many unnecessary surgeries that may damage the patient are done for this clinical entity.

Evidence Acquisition:

A PubMed search from 1995 through June 2016.

Study Design:

Clinical review.

Level of Evidence:

Level 4.

Results:

The etiology of AKP is multifactorial, and patients with AKP may therefore be divided into several subpopulations. The whole picture must be addressed for each patient to identify all potentially modifiable factors and to achieve better outcomes. Both pelvifemoral dysfunction and psychological factors that may affect the development and symptoms of AKP must be considered to identify therapeutic targets within the context of treatment. Patients presenting with AKP frequently respond well to load restriction that protects their knee and reduces pain during rehabilitation. Surgery should only be considered in very select cases. In a patient who has undergone previous patellar realignment surgery and experienced increased pain, iatrogenic medial patellar instability should be considered.

Conclusions:

The etiology of AKP is multifactorial, and several subpopulations of AKP patients exist and their treatment must be personalized. Normally, the focus is on the knee of a patient with AKP, and only that joint is examined. However, that focus can lead to overlooking other important etiological factors that may be present.