Comparison of tunnel variability between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction

Femoral Tunnel Position in Anatomical Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction is not Affected by Blumensaat's Line Morphology

The aim of this study was to reveal the influence of the morphological variations of the Blumensaat's line on anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) femoral tunnel position in anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Fifty-three subjects undergoing anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction were included (29 female, 24 male; median age 27.4 years; range: 14-50 years). Using an inside-out transportal technique, the PL tunnel position was made on a line drawn vertically from the bottommost point of the lateral condyle at 90 degrees of knee flexion, spanning a distance of 5 to 8 mm, to the edge of the joint cartilage. AM tunnel position was made 2 mm distal to the PL tunnel position. Following Iriuchishima's classification, the morphology of the Blumensaat's line was classified into straight and hill (large and small) types. Femoral tunnel position was determined using the quadrant method. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to compare straight and hill type knees according to AM and PL femoral tunnel position.There were 18 straight and 35 hill type knees (13 small and 22 large hill). AM and PL femoral tunnel position in straight type knees were 21.7 ± 7.0 and 33.6 ± 10.5% in the shallow-deep direction, and 42.1 ± 11.1 and 72.1 ± 8.5% in the high-low direction, respectively. In hill type knees, AM and PL femoral tunnel position were 21.3 ± 5.8 and 36.9 ± 7.1% in the shallow-deep direction, and 44.6 ± 10.7 and 72.1 ± 9.7% in the high-low direction, respectively. No significant difference in AM or PL femoral tunnel position was detected between straight and hill type knees.AM and PL femoral tunnel position in anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction was not affected by the morphological variations of the Blumensaat's line. Surgeons do not need to consider Blumensaat's line morphology if AM and PL femoral tunnel position is targeted at the bottommost point of the lateral condyle. This was a level of evidence III study.

The apex of the deep cartilage is a stable landmark to evaluate the femoral tunnel position in ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To develop a simple and effective method for evaluating the femoral tunnel position using the apex of the deep cartilage (ADC) as the landmark.

METHODS

A total of 52 patients who underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were recruited between June and September 2021. The femoral tunnel was placed on the central point of the anteromedial footprint with an accessory anteromedial and a high anterolateral portal. Then, the length from the ADC to the shallow cartilage margin (L₁) and to the center of the femoral tunnel (l₁), as well as the center to the low cartilage margin (H₁, intraoperative height), was measured under arthroscopy and on postoperative CT scans (L₂, l₂ and H₂). Moreover, intraoperative and postoperative cartilage ratios were equivalent to l₁/L₁ and l₂/L₂, respectively. Linear regression, Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were performed to evaluate the consistency between these two measurements of cartilage ratio (l/L) and height (H).

RESULTS

The mean age at the time of surgery was 28.7 years; 42 patients were male, and 17 patients were hurt in the left knee among 52 patients. The intraoperative cartilage ratio was 0.37 ± 0.04, and the height was 8.1 ± 1.1 mm with almost perfect inter-observer reproducibility. After the surgery, the cartilage ratio and height were measured as 0.39 ± 0.04 and 8.2 ± 1.3 mm on 3D-CT, respectively, with almost perfect intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Significant positive correlations and linear regression were detected in the cartilage ratio (r = 0.844, p < 0.001), and height (r = 0.926, p < 0.001) intraoperatively and postoperatively. The Bland-Altman plot also showed excellent consistency between arthroscopy and 3D-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADC is a good landmark in the assessment of femoral tunnel position, with excellent consistency between intraoperative arthroscopic measurements and postoperative 3D-CT.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Identifier: NCT04937517.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Influence of Graft Bending Angle on Femoral Tunnel Widening After Double-Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Comparison of Transportal and Outside-In Techniques

Background:

Previous studies have suggested that increased mechanical stress due to acute graft bending angle (GBA) is associated with tunnel widening and graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Few studies have compared the GBA between the outside-in (OI) and the transportal (TP) techniques.

Purpose:

To evaluate the influence of GBA on clinical outcomes and tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with OI versus TP technique.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Included in the study were 56 patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction (n = 28 in the OI group and n = 28 in the TP group). Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Tegner score, and knee laxity) 1 year postoperatively were evaluated. Computed tomography scans at 5 days and 1 year postoperatively were used for imaging measurements, and the femoral tunnel was divided into the proximal third, middle, and aperture sections. The GBA and cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured using image analysis software and were compared between groups. A correlation analysis was performed to determine if the GBA affected clinical outcomes or tunnel widening.

Results:

No significant difference was observed in clinical outcomes between the groups. The GBA of both the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral bundles were more acute in the OI group compared with the TP group (P < .05). The CSA at the AM tunnel aperture increased significantly in the OI group (84.2% ± 64.3%) compared with the TP group (51.4% ± 36.7%) (P = .04). However, there were no differences in the other sections. In the Pearson correlation test, GBA was not correlated with tunnel widening or clinical outcomes.

Conclusion:

Regardless of technique, the GBA did not have a significant influence on tunnel widening or clinical outcomes. Considering a wider AM tunnel aperture, a more proximal and posterior AM tunnel position might be appropriate with the OI technique.

Current and future of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques

In recent years, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has generally yielded favorable outcomes. However, ACL reconstruction has not provided satisfactory results in terms of the rate of returning to sports and prevention of osteoarthritis (OA) progression. In this paper, we outline current techniques for ACL reconstruction such as graft materials, double-bundle or single-bundle reconstruction, femoral tunnel drilling, all-inside technique, graft fixation, preservation of remnant, anterolateral ligament reconstruction, ACL repair, revision surgery, treatment for ACL injury with OA and problems, and discuss expected future trends. To enable many more orthopedic surgeons to achieve excellent ACL reconstruction outcomes with less invasive surgery, further studies aimed at improving surgical techniques are warranted. Further development of biological augmentation and robotic surgery technologies for ACL reconstruction is also required.

The sagittal cutting plane affects evaluation of the femoral bone tunnel position on three-dimensional computed tomography after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate how the femoral sagittal cutting plane affects evaluation of the bone tunnel position after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the quadrant method in three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent primary anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction and CT 2 weeks after surgery were enrolled. Three sagittal cutting planes with respect to the condylar axis were created using the CT images: at the top of the intercondylar notch (C-plane), 5% medial (M-plane), and 5% lateral (L-plane). The center of the bone tunnel position regarding depth and height of the anteromedial (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) were quantitatively evaluated using the quadrant method on the three different planes.

RESULTS

The mean depths of AMB and PLB were 27.4 ± 4.4% and 39.7 ± 5.1%, 27.0 ± 4.2% and 37.6 ± 4.9%, and 27.4 ± 4.5% and 38.5 ± 6.0%, at the M, C and L planes, respectively. The mean heights of AMB and PLB were 30.8 ± 6.3% and 56.2 ± 5.6%, 30.4 ± 6.2% and 56.6 ± 5.6%, and 25.4 ± 7.0% and 52.9 ± 6.9% at the M, C, and L planes, respectively. Both AMB and PLB bone tunnels were evaluated as higher positions in the L-plane than the C-plane (p < 0.01, p = 0.02, respectively) and M-plane (p < 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively), but there were no significant differences between the C-plane and M-plane (n.s.). There was no significant difference in the anteroposterior direction for all planes.

CONCLUSION

In evaluations of the bone tunnel position with the quadrant method using three-dimensional CT, the bone tunnel position depends on the femoral sagittal cutting plane. A consistent evaluation method should be used when evaluating the bone tunnel position after ACL reconstruction to enable correct evaluation clinically.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, Level III.

Influence of Graft Bending Angle on Graft Maturation, the Femoral Tunnel, and Functional Outcomes by 12 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

The graft bending angle (GBA), the angle between the femoral bone tunnel and the line connecting the femoral and tibial tunnel apertures, has been proven to influence stress within the graft and could be an important factor in graft healing within the joint and bone tunnel. However, the influence of the GBA on functional outcomes, particularly on return to sports (RTS), is rarely reported.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of the GBA on graft maturation, the femoral tunnel, and functional outcomes at 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). We hypothesized that a greater GBA might be related to bone tunnel widening, poor graft healing, and inferior functional outcomes after ACLR.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 43 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral ACLR with hamstring tendon autografts participated in this study. Their knees were evaluated using functional scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score, Lysholm knee activity score, Tegner activity scale, RTS) and the anterior tibial translation side-to-side difference (ATTD), as measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), at 12 months after surgery. Based on MRI, the signal/noise quotient (SNQ) of the graft, the GBA, and the femoral tunnel diameter were measured.

Results:

The mean GBA was 56° (range, 41°-69°). The GBA had a significant positive correlation with the SNQ (rho, 0.45; P = .003) and bone tunnel diameter (rho, 0.35; P = .02), but it had no significant correlation with any functional scores. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on GBA values: low GBA (LGBA; 40° < GBA ≤ 50°), middle GBA (MGBA; 50° < GBA ≤ 60°), and high GBA (HGBA; 60° < GBA ≤ 70°). The HGBA group had a significantly higher mean SNQ than both the LGBA (P = .01) and MGBA groups (P = .02). It also had a greater mean tunnel diameter than the LGBA group (P = .04). There was no significant difference in IKDC scores, Lysholm scores, ATTD, Tegner scores, or rates of RTS among groups.

Conclusion:

The GBA did not affect functional outcomes at 12 months after ACLR, although it affected the SNQ of the graft and the femoral tunnel diameter.

The quadrant method measuring four points is as a reliable and accurate as the quadrant method in the evaluation after anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The quadrant method was described by Bernard et al. and it has been widely used for postoperative evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this research is to further develop the quadrant method measuring four points, which we named four-point quadrant method, and to compare with the quadrant method.

METHODS

Three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) analyses were performed in 25 patients who underwent double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the outside-in technique. The four points in this study's quadrant method were defined as point1-highest, point2-deepest, point3-lowest, and point4-shallowest, in femoral tunnel position. Value of depth and height in each point was measured. Antero-medial (AM) tunnel is (depth1, height2) and postero-lateral (PL) tunnel is (depth3, height4) in this four-point quadrant method. The 3D-CT images were evaluated independently by 2 orthopaedic surgeons. A second measurement was performed by both observers after a 4-week interval. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was calculated by means of intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Also, the accuracy of the method was evaluated against the quadrant method.

RESULTS

Intra-observer reliability was almost perfect for both AM and PL tunnel (ICC > 0.81). Inter-observer reliability of AM tunnel was substantial (ICC > 0.61) and that of PL tunnel was almost perfect (ICC > 0.81). The AM tunnel position was 0.13% deep, 0.58% high and PL tunnel position was 0.01% shallow, 0.13% low compared to quadrant method.

CONCLUSIONS

The four-point quadrant method was found to have high intra- and inter-observer reliability and accuracy. This method can evaluate the tunnel position regardless of the shape and morphology of the bone tunnel aperture for use of comparison and can provide measurement that can be compared with various reconstruction methods. The four-point quadrant method of this study is considered to have clinical relevance in that it is a detailed and accurate tool for evaluating femoral tunnel position after ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

No difference in graft healing or clinical outcome between trans-portal and outside-in techniques after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare femoral tunnel geometry including tunnel position, length, and graft bending angle between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and discover whether such differences in tunnel geometry could influence graft healing or clinical outcome.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction performed with either trans-portal technique (32 patients, one centre) or outside-in technique (32 patients, the other centre) were included in this retrospective study. Femoral tunnel location and length, and graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel were analysed on 3D CT knee model. The location and length of the femoral tunnel and graft bending angle were compared between the two techniques. All patients underwent MRI scans at around 1 year following ACL reconstruction. It was found that all patients had intact ACL graft on MRI images. On oblique axial image taken after ACL reconstruction to determine graft healing at femoral and tibial tunnels and the intra-articular portion, graft signal intensity ratio was calculated by dividing signal intensity (SI) of the reconstructed ACL by that of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the region of interest selected with Marosis software. Clinical outcomes regarding Tegner activity scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation scores, Lachman test, and pivot shift test results were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

While the location of femoral tunnel was similar to each other in both groups, the femoral tunnel length was longer in the outside-in technique (37.0 vs. 32.4 mm, p = .02). Meanwhile, the outside-in technique showed significantly more acute graft tunnel angle than the trans-portal technique (106.7° vs. 113.8°, p = .01). However, signal intensity ratios of grafts (compared with SI of PCL) were similar in femoral and tibial tunnels and intra-articular portions. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of IKDC scores (89.4 vs. 90.5, n.s.) or Tegner activity scores (6.2 vs. 6.4, n.s.) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in measurement of Lachman or Pivot shift test either between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Even though the outside-in technique in ACL reconstruction created a more acute femoral graft bending angle and a longer femoral tunnel length than the trans-portal technique, these had no negative effect on graft healing. In addition, trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction showed similar femoral tunnel positions and clinical outcomes. Acceptable graft healing and clinical outcomes can be obtained for both trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Contact area between femoral tunnel and interference screw in anatomic rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction: a comparison of outside-in and trans-portal inside-out techniques

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the femoral tunnel length, the femoral graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture, and the contact area between the femoral tunnel wall and an interference screw used for fixation in anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ART ACLR).

METHODS

The study included 149 patients with primary ACL injury who underwent ART ACLR. Preoperatively, flexion angle of the index knee was checked under general anaesthesia. Those of less than 130° of passive flexion were assigned to the outside-in (OI) technique (78 patients), while the others to the trans-portal inside-out (TP) technique (71 patients). The patients underwent computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction at 3-5 weeks post-operatively. Femoral tunnel length, graft bending angle, and contact ratio between the IFS and femoral tunnel were assessed. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The femoral tunnel length in the OI technique was significantly longer than that in the TP technique (P < 0.001). The femoral graft bending angle in the OI technique was significantly more acute than that in the TP technique (P < 0.001). The contact ratio in the OI technique was significantly larger than that in the TP technique at every point in the femoral tunnel (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The OI technique resulted in a more acute femoral graft bending angle, longer mean femoral tunnel length, and larger contact ratio than the TP technique after ART ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective comparative study, Level III.

Can the outside-in half-tunnel technique reduce femoral tunnel widening in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A CT study

BACKGROUND

There are different techniques for drilling the femoral tunnel in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), but their influence in the bone tunnel enlargement in unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare two different surgical techniques for evaluating femoral tunnel enlargement in ACLR. The hypothesis was that tunnel placement using the outside-in technique leads to less tunnel enlargement compared to the transtibial technique.

METHODS

Forty-four patients treated for ACLR between March 2013 and March 2014 were prospectively enrolled in this study. According to the surgical technique, subjects were assigned to Group A (Out-in) or Group B (Transtibial). All patients underwent CT examination in order to evaluate the femoral tunnel enlargement at four different levels. Moreover, all patients were evaluated with the Lachman test and pivot shift test, and the KT1000 arthrometer was used to measure the anterior laxity of the knee. A subjective evaluation was performed using the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee score, Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale. All patients were assessed after 24 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

At the final follow-up, there were statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) in femoral tunnel enlargement between the two groups at all four femoral levels in favor of the out-in group. No statistical significant differences were found in the objective and subjective clinical outcomes between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In ACLR with a suspension system, the outside-in technique leads to less enlargement of the femoral tunnel lower than the transtibial technique.