Changes in sagittal component alignment alters patellar kinematics in TKA: an in vitro study

Does inverse kinematic alignment coupled with robot-assisted TKA optimize patellofemoral clinical and radiological results?

INTRODUCTION

With a satisfaction rate of 80%, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery has seen significant improvements in recent decades. The 20% of poor results may be explained by the alignment technique used for implant placement, which can influence patellofemoral kinematics. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that the use of inverse kinematic alignment makes it possible to obtain satisfactory clinical and radiological patellar scores in robotic TKA.

HYPOTHESIS

The inverse kinematic alignment technique coupled with robotic surgery makes it possible to restore the native kinematics of the patella.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study including 100 TKAs with a primary TKA performed using the Stryker Mako™ robotic surgery system, and the inverse kinematic alignment technique. Patients who underwent patella resurfacing were excluded. Clinical and radiological scores were recorded preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

At one year, the specific patellar clinical scores were excellent with an average Kujala score of 85.69 and an average HSS Patellar score 88.15. The average patellar lateralization index was 0.15 and the average patellar tilt was 5.1°, showing no significant difference compared to preoperation (p=0.45 and p=0.18). The average external rotation of the femoral implant was 0.47±0.6° [-1.9; 2.1].

DISCUSSION

The patellofemoral clinical results were excellent. The use of the robotic arm coupled with this alignment technique makes it possible to obtain a controlled external rotation of the femoral implant as well as an optimized orientation of the tibial component, favoring good restitution of the alignment of the extensor apparatus. This study did not demonstrate any radiological correction of patellar tilt and lateralization.

CONCLUSION

The combined use of robotic surgery with the inverse kinematic alignment technique seems effective on specific clinical results of the patellofemoral joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II; prospective cohort.

Internal rotational patellar resection and patella alta induced patellar maltracking in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative measurement of the patellofemoral pressure

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain due to patellar maltracking following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reduces patients' satisfaction. This study aimed to determine the patellofemoral pressure (PFP) in patients with favorable patellar tracking (FT) and impaired patellar tracking (IT) following TKA, the factors causing patellar maltracking, and the effect of lateral retinacular release (LRR) on patients with IT.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with varus knee osteoarthritis undergoing cruciate-retaining TKA were enrolled. After component implantation, patients with a separation of ≥ 2 mm of the patellar medial facet from the medial femoral trochlea throughout knee range of motion were classified into the IT group; meanwhile, the others were classified into the FT group. PFP was measured intraoperatively in three phases: (1) with the resurfaced patella (RP); (2) with the resurfaced patella and knee (RPK); and (3) when LRR was performed in IT (post-LRR). The PFPs at 0°, 90°, 120°, and 135° knee flexion were compared between FT and IT using the Mann-Whitney U test. Pairwise comparison of the PFP in IT between RPK and post-LRR was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Correlations between PFP and pre- and postoperative radiographic parameters, such as hip-knee-ankle angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle, anterior femoral offset, Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR), patellar tilt, and patellar resection angle (PRA), were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

High lateral PFP in the knee flexion position led to patellar maltracking. Patients with IT (n = 24) had higher lateral and lower medial PFP than did patients with FT (n = 20) at 90°, 120°, and 135° knee flexion in RP and RPK. LRR in IT reduced the lateral PFP in the knee flexion position. PRA and ISR were correlated with the lateral PFP at no less than 90° in RP and RPK.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that internal rotational patellar resection, which resulted in a thick medial patellar remnant and a thin lateral counterpart, and patella alta were the causative factors of high lateral PFP, which induced patellar maltracking after TKA. Surgeons should avoid internal rotational patellar resection to achieve FT and perform LRR in patients with patellar maltracking.

[Patellar tracking in knee arthroplasty]

Knee arthroplasty is a demanding procedure that, when carried out appropriately, results in significant pain relief and patient satisfaction. The success of the operation is influenced by many factors. The most important ones describe the implant design, the orientation of the components and the ligament tension. The patellofemoral joint is often neglected as an important part of the operation. Initially, complications in the area of the patellofemoral joint do not appear to be devastating, but in many cases, they lead to significant consequences for the patient, along with severe pain and limited mobility. The most common complications arise from patellar maltracking. This often occurs due to misplacement of the tibial and femoral components and the altered shape of the patella. If the placement of the components with regard to patellar tracking is considered, bony and/or soft tissue addressing measures remain to further optimize the movement of the patella. The following manuscript is dedicated to discussing causes to avoid patellar maltracking and improve clinical outcomes.

Sagittal Patellar Offset Ratio Can Be a Predictor of Anterior Knee Pain after Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty without Patella Resurfacing

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain (AKP) is an issue that persists even after successful total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In some patients, reasons for AKP occurrence are known, but it is unexplained in some others despite the patellofemoral joint being thought to be the main focus of pain. We investigated the relationship between unexplained AKP and the patellofemoral joint in the sagittal plane after primary TKA.

METHODS

We evaluated 372 knees of 317 patients retrospectively, who had completed a minimum 24-month follow-up. We divided them into two groups according to the presence of AKP. Sagittal patellar offset ratio (SPOR), anterior femoral offset ratio (AFOR), and Insall-Salvati ratio (ISR) were measured on lateral X-rays. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford knee score (OKS) and WOMAC pre-and postoperatively, and AKP was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS) postoperatively.

RESULTS

Between non-AKP and AKP groups, SPOR (p < 0.001) and AFOR (p = 0.03) were significantly different but not ISR (p = 0.89). SPOR and AFOR were found to be two independent risk factors that may predict the likelihood of AKP. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed that AFOR is a poor value, whereas SPOR is a reasonable predictive value. No correlation between SPOR and postoperative OKS (p = 0.92) and WOMAC (p = 0.25) and no correlation between AFOR and postoperative OKS (p = 0.44) and WOMAC (p = 0.58) were found.

CONCLUSION

We found that SPOR is a good predictive tool with a cutoff value of 46.4% and 91.5% sensitivity for AKP and its increased ratio increases the probability of AKP following TKA. Considering that the patellar offset will not change, especially in patients without patella resurfacing, care should be taken not to increase the anterior femoral offset.

Wide variation in tibial slopes and trochlear angles in the arthritic knee: a CT evaluation of 4116 pre-operative knees

PURPOSE

As surgeons continue to grapple with persistent issues of patient dissatisfaction post-TKA, the literature has focused on the coronal plane when considering alignment strategies but has largely ignored the sagittal and axial planes. The purpose of this retrospective observational cohort study is to evaluate variability in knee anatomy and alignment beyond the coronal plane and rationalise how this relates to existing arthroplasty alignment philosophies.

METHODS

4116 knee CTs from 360 Knee Systems© database of arthritic pre-operative TKA patients were evaluated. Standardised bony landmarks were used in each CT to determine the hip-knee angle, medial proximal tibial angle, lateral distal femoral angle, medial plateau posterior tibial slope, lateral plateau posterior tibial slope, trochlea angle (TA) to distal femoral angle (TA-DFA) and TA to posterior condylar angle (TA-PCA). Analysis was performed to determine the distributions of each measure across the cohort population.

RESULTS

Both the medial and lateral PTS ranged from 5° anterior to 25° posterior. 22.6% of patients had differential PTS greater than 5°. 14.5% have greater lateral PTS (mean difference to medial PTS of 4.8° ± 5.0°), whilst 31.0% have greater medial PTS (mean difference to lateral PTS of 5.7° ± 3.2°). 14% of TA-DFAs and 5.2% of TA-PCAs vary greater than 10°.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a wide variation in tibial slope, differential slope between the medial and lateral tibial plateau as well as variation in the trochlear geometry. There has been an overemphasis in the literature on coronal alignment, ignoring the considerable variability present in tibial and patellofemoral morphology. Existing arthroplasty techniques are based on assumptions that may not adequately address the anatomy of morphologic outliers and could lead to dissatisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III-retrospective cohort study.

The position of entry point in total knee arthroplasty is associate with femoral bowing both in coronal and sagittal planes

Objective

To investigate the femoral entry point of the intramedullary (IM) guiding rod applied to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in Chinese subjects and the relationship with femoral bowing in the coronal and sagittal planes through three-dimensional (3D) validation methods.

Methods

Computed tomography (CT) images of 80 femurs in Chinese subjects were imported into Mimics 19.0 to construct 3D models. All operations were conducted by Rhinoceros software 5.0. The position of the IM rod entry point was assessed by calculating the distance between the entry point and the apex of the intercondylar notch (AIN) in the coronal and sagittal planes. The coronal femoral bowing angle (cFBA) and sagittal femoral bowing angle (sFBA) were also measured.

Results

The average optimal entry point was 0.17 mm medial and 12.37 mm anterior to the AIN in males, while it was 0.02 mm lateral and 16.13 mm anterior to the AIN in females. There was a significant difference between males and females in the sagittal plane (t = -6.570, p = 0.000). The mean cFBA was 1.68 ± 2.29°, and the mean sFBA was 12.66 ± 1.98°. The sFBA was strongly correlated with the anterior distance of the proper entry point, and the cFBA was moderately correlated with the lateral distance of the proper entry point.

Conclusions

There was a strong correlation between the position of the entry point and the femoral bowing angle in both the coronal and sagittal planes. Thus, to achieve better alignment, the position of the entry point should be measured individually based on femoral bowing.

Computer-Aided Surgery-Navigated, Functional Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Surgical Technique

The decision on which technique to use to perform a total knee arthroplasty has become much more complicated over the last decade. The shortfalls of mechanical alignment and kinematic alignment has led to the development of a new alignment philosophy, functional alignment. Functional alignment uses preoperative radiographic measurements, computer-aided surgery, and intraoperative assessment of balance, to leave the patient with the most “normal” knee kinematics achievable with minimal soft-tissue release. The purpose of this surgical technique article is to describe in detail the particular technique needed to achieve these alignment objectives.

Is the femoral component flexion affected by the sagittal femoral shaft bowing in conventional intramedullary guided TKA?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of sagittal femoral bowing on sagittal femoral component alignment, and whether there was correlation between sagittal femoral component alignment and coronal femoral component alignment.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 77 knees in 71 patients who had undergone primary TKA for advanced osteoarthritis. All surgeries were performed by using a standard medial parapatellar approach. The osteotomy was performed with a conventional technique using an intramedullary rod for the femur and a mechanical extramedullary guiding system for the tibia. All patients enrolled in the study were evaluated with full-length lower extremity load-bearing standing scanograms, and the patients had preoperative and postoperative radiographs of the knees. Coronal femoral bowing angle (cFBA), sagittal femoral bowing angle (sFBA), and postoperatively, mechanical tibiofemoral angle of the knee (mTFA), β angle (femoral component flexion angle) were measured. The radiographic results of both groups were compared using Student's t test. A two-sided Pearson correlation coefficient was obtained to identify the correlations between FBA in the coronal and sagittal planes, as well as FBA and age or BMI, sFBA and β angle, cFBA and mTFA. Comparison of FSB incidence between different genders was made using Chi-square test. The p value < 0.05 indicates a statistically significant difference.

RESULTS

The mean sFBA, cFBA, β angle, mTFA were 9.34° ± 3.56°(range 1°-16°), 3.25° ± 3.79°(range - 7° to -17°), 3.91° ± 3.15°(range - 1° to -13°), 0.60° ± 1.95°(range - 3° to -6°), respectively. There was no correlation between age and sFBA (CC = 0.192, p = 0.194) or cFBA (CC = 0.192, p = 0.194); similarly, there was no correlation between age and sFBA (CC = 0.067, p = 0.565) or cFBA (CC = 0.069, p = 0.549). The sFBA was correlated with cFBA and β angle (CC = 0.540, p < 0.01; CC = 0.543, p < 0.01, respectively), and the cFBA was correlated with mTFA (CC = 0.430, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference (p = 0.247) of cFBA between the patients with sFSB and the patients without sFSB.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the sFBA was correlated with cFBA in the patients undergoing TKA and the patients with sFSB usually presented non-cFSB. We also found that sFSB could affect the femoral component alignment in the sagittal plane and cFSB could affect the femoral component alignment in the coronal plane. The sFBA or cFBA was not correlated with age, BMI, or gender.

Secondary Patellar Resurfacing in TKA: A Combined Analysis of Registry Data and Biomechanical Testing

The German Arthroplasty registry (EPRD) has shown that different prosthesis systems have different rates of secondary patellar resurfacing: four years after implantation, the posterior-stabilized (PS) Vega prosthesis has a 3.2% risk of secondary patellar resurfacing compared to the cruciate-retaining (CR) Columbus prosthesis at 1.0% (both Aesculap AG, Tuttlingen, Germany). We hypothesized that PS implants have increased retropatellar pressure and a decreased retropatellar contact area compared to a CR design, which may lead to an increased likelihood of secondary patellar resurfacing. Eight fresh frozen specimens (cohort 1) were tested with an established knee rig. In addition, a possible influence of the registry-based patient collective (cohort 2) was investigated. No significant differences were found in patient data–cohort 2-(sex, age). A generally lower number of PS system cases is noteworthy. No significant increased patella pressure could be detected with the PS design, but a lower contact area was observed (cohort 1). Lower quadriceps force (100°–130° flexion), increased anterior movement of the tibia (rollback), greater external tilt of the patella, and increasing facet pressure in the Vega PS design indicate a multifactorial cause for a higher rate of secondary resurfacing which was found in the EPRD patient cohort and might be related to the PS’ principle function.

Association Between Femoral Component Sagittal Positioning and Anterior Knee Pain in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Case-Control Follow-up Study of a Cruciate-Retaining Single-Radius Design

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain is the most common complication of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to assess whether sagittal femoral component position is an independent predictor of anterior knee pain after cruciate-retaining single-radius TKA without routine patellar resurfacing.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of 297 cruciate-retaining single-radius TKAs performed in 2006 and 2007 without routine patellar resurfacing identified 73 patients (25%) with anterior knee pain and 89 (30%) with no pain (controls) at 10 years. Patients were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 5, and 10 years postoperatively using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the Short Form-12 (SF-12), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and satisfaction and expectation questionnaires. Variables that were assessed as predictors of anterior knee pain included demographic data, the indication for the TKA, early complications, stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia, and radiographic criteria (implant alignment, Insall-Salvati ratio, posterior condylar offset ratio, and anterior femoral offset ratio).

RESULTS

The 73 patients with anterior knee pain (mean age, 67.0 years [range, 38 to 82 years]; 48 [66%] female) had a mean visual analog scale (VAS) score of 34.3 (range, 5 to 100) compared with 0 for the 89 patients with no pain (mean age, 66.5 years [range, 41 to 82 years]; 60 [67%] female). The patients with anterior knee pain had mean femoral component flexion of -0.6° (95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.5° to 0.3°), which differed significantly from the value for the patients with no pain (1.42° [95% CI = 0.9° to 2.0°]; p < 0.001). The patients with and those without anterior knee pain also differed significantly with regard to the mean anterior femoral offset ratio (17.2% [95% CI = 15.6% to 18.8%] compared with 13.3% [95% CI = 11.1% to 15.5%]; p = 0.005) and the mean medial proximal tibial angle (89.7° [95% CI = 89.2° to 90.1°] compared with 88.9° [95% CI = 88.4° to 89.3°]; p = 0.009). All PROMs were worse in the anterior knee pain group at 10 years (p < 0.05), and the OKSs were worse at 1, 5, and 10 years (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed femoral component flexion, the medial proximal tibial angle, and an Insall-Salvati ratio of <0.8 (patella baja) as independent predictors of anterior knee pain (R = 0.263). Femoral component extension of ≥0.5° predicted anterior knee pain with 87% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, 25% of patients had anterior knee pain at 10 years following a single-radius cruciate-retaining TKA without routine patellar resurfacing. Sagittal plane positioning and alignment of the femoral component were associated with long-term anterior knee pain, with femoral component extension being a major risk factor.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty leads to a better restoration of patellar kinematics compared to mechanic alignment

PURPOSE

The influence of different implantation techniques in TKA on tibiofemoral kinematics was analysed in few investigations so far. However, the influence on patellar kinematics remain unclear. The aim of the present investigation was to compare patellar kinematics of the natural knee with those of knees after both kinematically and mechanically aligned TKAs.

METHODS

Patellar kinematics of ten cadaveric knees before and after TKAs implanted using both a kinematic and mechanic alignment technique were investigated and compared using a commercial optical computer navigation system.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant difference between natural patellar kinematics and both implantation techniques analysing mediolateral shift. Patellar lateral tilt showed significant better results in the kinematically compared to the mechanically aligned TKAs. In terms of patella rotation, the patella of both mechanically and kinematically aligned TKAs showed significant higher values for external rotation compared to the natural knee. Regarding epicondylar distance again a significant better restoration of natural kinematics could be found in the kinematically aligned TKAs.

CONCLUSION

Kinematically aligned TKAs showed a better overall restoration of patellar kinematics compared to a conventional mechanical alignment technique. In terms of clinical usefulness, the present study highlights the potential benefit for clinical outcome using a kinematically aligned implantation technique in TKA to achieve a better restoration of natural patellofemoral kinematics.

Impact of intraoperative adjustment method for increased flexion gap on knee kinematics after posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In general, the flexion gap is larger than the extension gap with posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing total knee arthroplasty. Several methods compensate for an excessive flexion gap, but their effects are unknown. The purpose of this study was to compare three methods to compensate for an increased flexion gap.

METHODS

In this study, squatting in knees with excessive (4 mm) and moderate (2 mm) flexion gaps was simulated in a computer model. Differences in knee kinematics and kinetics with joint line elevation, setting the femoral component in flexion, and using a larger femoral component as compensatory methods were investigated.

FINDINGS

The rotational kinematics during flexion with setting the femoral component in flexion were opposite to those in the other models. Using a larger femoral component resulted in the most physiological motion. The peak anterior translation was 10 mm in the joint line elevation model compared with approximately 6 mm in the other models. In the joint line elevation model, patellofemoral contact stress was excessively increased at 90° of knee flexion. In contrast, tibiofemoral contact stress was higher during knee extension with setting the femoral component in flexion due to anterior impingement. There were few differences in the effect of the three compensatory methods with a moderate flexion gap.

INTERPRETATION

A larger femoral component should be used to compensate for an excessive flexion gap because it has less negative impact on posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing total knee arthroplasty, whereas any compensation method might be acceptable for a moderate flexion gap.

Rotation of intramedullary alignment rods affects distal femoral cutting plane in total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Intramedullary rods are widely used to align the distal femoral cut in total knee arthroplasty. We hypothesised that both coronal (varus/valgus) and sagittal (extension/flexion) cutting plane are affected by rotational changes of intramedullary femoral alignment guides.

METHODS

Distal femoral cuts using intramedullary alignment rods were simulated by means of a computer-aided engineering software in 4°, 6°, 8°, 10°, and 12° of valgus in relation to the femoral anatomical axis and 4° extension, neutral, as well as 4°, 8°, and 12° of flexion in relation to the femoral mechanical axis. This reflects the different angles between anatomical and mechanical axis in coronal and sagittal planes. To assess the influence of rotation of the alignment guide on the effective distal femoral cutting plane, all combinations were simulated with the rod gradually aligned from 40° of external to 40° of internal rotation.

RESULTS

Rotational changes of the distal femoral alignment guides affect both the coronal and sagittal cutting planes. When alignment rods are intruded neutrally with regards to sagittal alignment, external rotation causes flexion, while internal rotation causes extension of the sagittal cutting plane. Simultaneously the coronal effect (valgus) decreases resulting in an increased varus of the cutting plane. However, when alignment rods are intruded in extension or flexion partly contradictory effects are observed. Generally the effect increases with the degree of valgus preset, rotation and flexion.

CONCLUSION

As incorrect rotation of intramedullary alignment guides for distal femoral cuts causes significant cutting errors, exact rotational alignment is crucial. Coronal cutting errors in the distal femoral plane might result in overall leg malalignment, asymmetric extension gaps and subsequent sagittal cutting errors.

Native rotational knee kinematics are lost in bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty when the tibial component is replaced

PURPOSE

To compare the kinematics between native knees and knees that have undergone bicruciate-retaining (BCR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA converted from BCR TKA in the same whole-body cadaveric specimen using a navigation system and, if differences exist, to investigate the point at which normal kinematics are lost during the procedure.

METHODS

The rotational kinematics throughout passive flexion of the native knee and of knees after meniscectomy, femoral replacement, BCR TKA, or CR TKA were assessed in nine fresh frozen cadavers using an image-free navigation system.

RESULTS

The rotational kinematic pattern of a knee after BCR TKA was different from that of a native knee, especially in the early flexion phase, and was similar to that after CR TKA. Screw-home movement was not observed after BCR TKA, but still occurred after meniscectomy or femoral replacement with intact cruciate ligaments and an intact tibial articular surface.

CONCLUSION

The rotational kinematics of the native knee are not always preserved after BCR TKA. Native rotational kinematics are preserved after meniscectomy and femoral replacement, but are lost after tibial replacement in BCR TKA. Surgeons should pay close attention to maintain the anteroposterior stabilizing function of the ACL in BCR TKA, rather than to restore the native rotational kinematics.

Bone-femoral component interface gap after sagittal mechanical axis alignment is filled with new bone after cementless total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

This study retrospectively evaluated the fate of mismatch between an uncemented femoral component and each femoral cut surface (i.e., wedge-shaped gap) relative to sagittal mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Primary TKA was performed on 99 consecutive knees. The femoral components were aligned to the sagittal mechanical axis with CT-based navigation. All patients were assessed with postoperative true lateral radiographs. Bone-side surfaces of the uncemented femoral component were divided into five zones: anterior flange, anterior chamfer, posterior chamfer, posterior part, and distal part, which were defined as zones 1 to 5, respectively. Bone filling of wedge-shaped gaps in each zone was evaluated after 1 year.

RESULTS

Femoral anterior notching did not occur. However, wedge-shaped gaps were observed in at least one zone in 23 of 99 knees (23%), most frequently in zone 5 (18%). There were 9 and 7 gaps in zones 1 and 2, respectively. The femoral component showed malpositioning of approximately 3° of flexion in cases with wedge-shaped gaps in zones 2 and/or 5. After one year, 67% (6/9) of zone 1, 100% (7/7) of zone 2, and 94% (17/18) of zone 5 wedge-shaped gaps were filled in with new bone.

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral alignment relative to sagittal mechanical axis caused wedge-shaped gaps due to unstable anterior bone cutting through hard bone, but the small gaps were not clinically significant and filled in within one year. Sagittal setting of the femoral component should aim for the anatomical axis rather than the mechanical axis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Patellar tracking in primary total knee arthroplasty

This is a review of the recent literature of the various factors that affect patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Patellar tracking principally depends on the pre-existing patellar tracking and the rotational alignment of the femoral and tibial implants, but the detailed movements depend on the patellar shape. The latter means that the patellar kinematics of any implanted TKA does not return to normal.

Laboratory cadaveric studies use normal knees and non-activity-based testing conditions and so may not translate into clinical findings.

The recent literature has not added anything significant to change established clinical practice in achieving satisfactory patellar tracking following TKA.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:106-113. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170036.

Varus femoral and tibial coronal alignments result in different kinematics and kinetics after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Abnormal knee motion under various conditions has been described after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, differences in kinematics and kinetics of knees with varus femoral versus varus tibial alignment have not been evaluated. It was hypothesized that varus femoral and tibial alignments have the same impact on knee motion.

METHODS

A musculoskeletal computer simulation was used. Femoral and tibial alignment in the coronal plane was each varied from neutral to 5° of varus in 1° increments. Lift-off, defined as an intercomponent distance of >2 mm, and tibiofemoral contact forces were evaluated during gait up to 60° of knee flexion. Knee kinematics and contact stresses were also examined during squat, with up to 130° of knee flexion.

RESULTS

During gait, lift-off occurred readily with more than 3° of varus tibial alignment and slight lateral joint laxity. In contrast, lift-off did not occur with varus femoral or tibial alignment of up to 5° during squat. Peak medial contact forces with varus femoral alignment were approximately twice those observed with varus tibial alignment. The lowest points of the femoral condyles moved internally with varus femoral alignment, contrary to the kinematics with neutral or varus tibial alignment. On the other hand, there was femoral medial sliding and edge loading against the tibia in mid-flexion with varus tibial alignment.

CONCLUSION

Varus femoral alignment affects the non-physiological rotational movement of the tibiofemoral joint, whereas varus tibial alignment causes medial-lateral instability during mid-flexion. Varus femoral and tibial alignments might lead to post-TKA discomfort and unreliability.

Coronal femoral TKA position significantly influences in vivo patellar loading in unresurfaced patellae after primary total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

As patellar tracking and loading is influenced by tibial tuberosity and trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patellar height, thickness and tilt as well as TKA component position, it was our hypothesis that these parameters significantly correlate with patellar BTU intensity and localization in SPECT/CT. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether TKA component position as well as the height, thickness and tilt of the unresurfaced patella influences the intensity and the distribution pattern of BTU in SPECT/CT.

METHODS

A total of 62 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA without patellar resurfacing were prospectively included. Demographic data such as age, gender, side and type of primary TKA were noted. All patients underwent clinical and radiological examination in a specialized knee clinic, including standardized radiographs (anterior-posterior and lateral weight bearing, patellar skyline view) and Tc-99m-HDP-SPECT/CT before, 12 and 24 months after TKA. SPECT/CT images were analysed on 3D reconstructed images. Rotational, sagittal and coronal position of the tibial and femoral TKA components was assessed using a previously validated analysis software. Measurements of BTU including intensity and anatomical distribution pattern were also performed from 3D data. The patellar height, thickness and tilt were measured, and the distance between TT and TG was measured using axial CT images. Univariate analysis was performed to identify any correlations between BTU and TKA component position and patellar measurements (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

The highest median BTU was measured in the superior posterior parts of the patella. A statistically significant correlation was found between valgus alignment of the femoral TKA and increased BTU at the lateral patellar regions (p < 0.05). External rotation of the tibial TKA correlated with increased BTU at the lateral superior joint adjacent part (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between the tibial TKA position (varus-valgus, anterior and posterior slope), TT-TG distance, patellar height and patellar BTU values.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant correlation of increased patellar BTU was found with femoral valgus TKA alignment. These findings highlight the importance of femoral TKA position in coronal plane with regard to post-operative patellar tracking. Moreover, these facts might explain anterior knee pain in unhappy TKA with femoral valgus alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic study, Level II.

Mediolateral femoral component position in TKA significantly alters patella shift and femoral roll-back

PURPOSE

Increased retropatellar pressure and altered kinematics are associated with anterior knee pain and unsatisfied patients after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Since malposition of the implant is believed to contribute to postoperative pain, we performed this in vitro study to evaluate the influence of mediolateral femoral component position on retropatellar pressure as well as tibio-femoral and patella kinematics.

METHODS

For the test, a fixed-bearing TKA was implanted in eight fresh frozen cadaver specimens. To determine the impact of mediolateral (ML) position, three variants of femoral components (3-mm medialization, neutral position and 3-mm lateralization) were produced using rapid prototyping replicas. In a knee rig, a loaded squat from 20° to 120° of flexion was applied. Retropatellar pressure distribution was measured with a pressure-sensitive film. Additionally, an ultrasonic-based three-dimensional motion analysis system was used to register patello- and tibio-femoral kinematics.

RESULTS

ML translation of the femoral component by 3 mm did not lead to a significant alteration in retropatellar peak pressure (medial 6.5 ± 2.5 MPa vs. lateral 6.0 ± 2.4 MPa). Following the ML translation of the femoral component, the patella was significantly shifted and tilted in the same directions. Varying the ML femoral component position also led to a significant alteration in femoral roll-back.

CONCLUSION

In day-by-day use, ML position should be chosen with care since there is a significant influence on patella shift and femoral roll-back. Retropatellar pressure is not significantly altered, so there is no clear evidence of an impact on anterior knee pain.

Superior-inferior position of patellar component affects patellofemoral kinematics and contact forces in computer simulation

BACKGROUND

Anterior knee pain has been reported as a major postoperative complication after total knee arthroplasty, which may lead to patient dissatisfaction. Rotational alignment and the medial-lateral position correlate with patellar maltracking, which can cause knee pain postoperatively. However, the superior-inferior position of the patellar component has not been investigated. The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effects of the patellar superior-inferior position on patellofemoral kinematics and kinetics.

METHODS

Superior, central, and inferior models with a dome patellar component were constructed. In the superior and inferior models, the position of the patellar component translated superiorly and inferiorly, respectively, by 3mm, relative to the center model. Kinematics of the patellar component, quadriceps force, and patellofemoral contact force were calculated using a computer simulation during a squatting activity in a weight-bearing deep knee bend.

FINDINGS

In the inferior model, the flexion angle, relative to the tibial component, was the greatest among all models. The inferior model showed an 18.0%, 36.5%, and 22.7% increase in the maximum quadriceps force, the maximum medial patellofemoral force, and the maximum lateral patellofemoral force, respectively, compared with the superior model.

INTERPRETATION

Superior-inferior positions affected patellofemoral kinematic and kinetics. Surgeons should avoid the inferior position of the patellar component, because the inferior positioned model showed greater quadriceps and patellofemoral force, resulting in a potential risk for anterior knee pain and component loosening.