Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis

Cell-free biomimetic osteochondral scaffold for the treatment of knee articular surface lesions: Clinical outcomes differ based on patient and lesion characteristics

PURPOSE

A cell-free biomimetic osteochondral scaffold was developed to treat cartilage knee lesions, with positive clinical results documented in small case series. However, clear evidence on patient and lesion characteristics that might affect the outcome is still lacking. The aim of this study is to analyse a large cohort of patients treated with this scaffold to investigate factors that could influence the clinical outcome.

METHODS

Two hundred and three patients (mean age 30.7 ± 10.9 years) treated with this scaffold were prospectively evaluated at baseline, 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-up. The clinical outcome was analysed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and the activity level was assessed with the Tegner score. The influence of patient and lesion characteristics on clinical outcomes was analysed.

RESULTS

Mild and severe adverse reactions were found in 39.0% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. The failure rate was 2.0%, increasing to 12.3% when including also clinical failures. The IKDC subjective score increased from 43.3 ± 15.9 to 61.0 ± 16.2 at 6 months, 68.3 ± 18.5 at 12 months and 73.8 ± 18.3 at 24 months (p < 0.0005). The Tegner improved from 2.5 ± 1.7 to 4.2 ± 1.7 at 24 months (p < 0.0005), without reaching the pre-injury level (6.0 ± 2.2) (p < 0.0005). The IKDC objective score changed from 68.5% normal and nearly normal knees before the treatment to 90.1% at 24 months. At 24 months, age showed a correlation with the IKDC subjective score (ρ = -0.247; p < 0.0005), women had a lower score (p < 0.0005), as well as patients with patellar lesions (p = 0.002). Previous surgery correlated with lower results (p = 0.003), while better results were found in osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) compared to degenerative lesions (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This cell-free biomimetic scaffold is a safe and effective treatment for cartilage knee lesions, offering positive clinical results at 2 years with a low failure rate. Better outcomes were observed in younger patients, in lesions of the femoral condyles and in OCD, while joints affected by patellar lesions, patients who underwent previous knee surgery, and women may expect lower results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Cohort study.

Initial Outcomes of Single versus Multiple-Plug Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Defects of the Knee: A Matched Cohort Analysis

Although several prior studies have described the outcomes of osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation for single osteochondral lesions, there is a paucity of comparative data on outcomes of single versus multiple OCA transplants. We aimed to describe the initial outcomes of single-plug versus multiple-plug knee OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between patients undergoing single-plug and multiple-plug OCA transplants at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed the prospectively collected data of patients undergoing OCA transplantation for large (>2 cm2) osteochondral defects of the knee. Thirty patients who underwent multiple-plug (2 + ) OCA transplants (either single surface using the snowman technique or multi-surface) were 1:1 age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) matched with 30 patients who underwent single-plug OCA transplants. PROMs, including the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscores, were obtained both preoperatively and at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively. Failure was defined as a revision OCA or conversion to unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The cohort comprised 30 females (31 affected left knees), with an average age of 37 ± 10.3 years and median follow-up of 2.0 years (interquartile range: 1.7-2.5 years). There was a significant increase in PROMs from the preoperative to the postoperative period for the entire cohort and the single-plug versus multiple-plug subgroups (p < 0.01). There was no difference between the groups with respect to the percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for each PROM (p > 0.05). There were two failures, both in the single-plug group, with a mean time to failure of 3.5 years. There was no difference in the initial outcomes between patients undergoing single-plug versus multiple-plug OCA transplant at the short-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE::  Level IV, case series.

Outcomes following gel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation for articular cartilage defects of the knee

BACKGROUND

Gel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (GACI) enables a simpler and more effective delivery of chondrocytes with reproducible three-dimensional structural restoration of the articular cartilage surface. There is limited documentation of medium-term outcomes. This study assessed safety and effectiveness of GACI for treatment of cartilage defects of the knee.

METHODS

This multicentric retrospective study was conducted across eight hospitals in India. Patients who had undergone GACI (CARTIGROW®) between 2008 and 2014 for the treatment of focal articular cartilage defects of the knee (mean defect size 4.5 ± 5.8 cm2) in limbs with normal alignment were analyzed. Primary outcomes were changes in Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score, and Knee Outcome Sports Activity Scale (SAS).

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients (110 knee joints) with mean age 31.0 ± 10.5 years were included. The mean follow-up was 9.8 ± 1.5 years (range 7.85-13.43). Majority had osteochondritis dissecans (n = 51; 46.4%). The mean Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale score (81.23 ± 13.21 vs. 51.32 ± 17.89; p < 0.0001) and SAS score (80.93 ± 8.26 vs. 28.11 ± 12.28; p < 0.0001) improved significantly at follow-up as compared to pre-operative. Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue score in 39 patients at minimum 2 years follow-up was 84.5 ± 4.3. Among 30 patients who were playing sports before treatment, 17 patients (56.7%) could return to the same or higher level of sports post-transplantation. No major intra-operative or post-operative complications were noted. Four patients warranted revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

GACI is an effective treatment option for large focal articular cartilage defects of the knee with a low complication rate and revision rate and significant improvement in functional scores.

Comparable Clinical and Functional Outcomes Between Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation and Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Lesions in the Patellofemoral Joint at a Mean Follow-up of 5 Years

PURPOSE

To assess clinical outcomes and return to sport (RTS) rates among patients who undergo osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) or matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI), for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent an OCA or ACI/MACI from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. Patient-reported outcomes collected included visual analog scale for pain/satisfaction, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and RTS. The percentage of patients that met the patient acceptable symptom state for KOOS was recorded. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of worse outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 95 patients were included (78% follow-up) with ACI or MACI performed in 55 cases (57.9%) and OCA in 40 (42.1%). A tibial tubercle osteotomy was the most common concomitant procedure for OCA (66%) and ACI/MACI (98%). Overall, KOOS pain was significantly poorer in OCA than ACI/MACI (74.7, 95% confidence interval 68.1-81.1 vs 83.6, 95% confidence interval 81.3, 88.4, P = .012), whereas the remaining KOOS subscores were nonsignificantly different (all P > .05). Overall, RTS rate was 54%, with no significant difference in return between OCA or ACI/MACI (52% vs 58%, P = .738). There were 26 (27%) reoperations and 5 (5%) graft failures in the entire group. Increasing age was associated with lower satisfaction in OCA and poorer outcomes in ACI/MACI, whereas larger lesion area was associated with lower satisfaction and poorer outcomes in ACI/MACI.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and functional outcomes were similar in patients who underwent OCA or ACI/MACI for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects at a mean follow-up of 5 years. Patients who received OCA had a greater proportion of degenerative cartilage lesions and, among those with trochlear lesions, reported greater pain at final follow-up than their ACI/MACI counterparts. Overall, increasing age and a larger lesion size were associated with worse patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Autologous Osteochondral Transfer of the Knee Demonstrates Continued High Rates of Return to Sport and Low Rates of Conversion to Arthroplasty at Long-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate (1) activity level and knee function, (2) reoperation and failure rates, and (3) risk factors for reoperation and failure of autologous osteochondral transfer (AOT) at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the long-term outcomes of AOT was performed. Studies reported on activity-based outcomes (Tegner Activity Scale) and clinical outcomes (Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee score). Reoperation and failure rates as defined by the publishing authors were recorded for each study. Modified Coleman Methodology Scores were calculated to assess study methodological quality.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with a total of 495 patients and an average age of 32.5 years at the time of surgery and a mean follow-up of 15.1 years (range, 10.4-18.0 years) were included. The mean defect size was 3.2 cm2 (range, 1.9-6.9 cm2). The mean duration of symptoms before surgery was 5.1 years. Return to sport rates ranged from 86% to 100%. Conversion to arthroplasty rates ranged from 0% to 16%. The average preoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores ranged from 32.9 to 36.8, and the average postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee scores at final follow-up ranged from 66.3 to 77.3. The average preoperative Lysholm scores ranged from 44.5 to 56.0 and the average postoperative Lysholm scores ranged from 70.0 to 96.5. The average preoperative Tegner scores ranged from 2.5 to 3.0, and the average postoperative scores ranged from 4.1 to 7.0.

CONCLUSIONS

AOT of the knee resulted in high rates of return to sport with correspondingly low rates of conversion to arthroplasty at long-term follow-up. In addition, AOT demonstrated significant improvements in long-term patient-reported outcomes from baseline.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Editorial Commentary: Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Osteochondral Transfer of the Knee Are Successful and Predicated Upon Appropriate Patient Selection

Cartilage restoration techniques continue to grow in complexity, expanding from traditional marrow stimulation or isolated chondroplasty of chondral lesions to various grafting procedures. Microfracture can induce a less favorable biologic response that includes formation of type I fibrocartilage and development of subchondral cystic changes or sclerosis. Thus, chondral graft options that restore native type II hyaline cartilage are favored. Autologous osteochondral transfer is a favorable graft option because it provides native type II hyaline cartilage on an autologous subchondral scaffold that most closely emulates the native chondral environment, and clinical studies demonstrate better functional outcomes and return to sport compared with other cartilage grafting and bone marrow stimulation procedures. Patient factors, including sex, age, lesion location, lesion size, etiology, and preinjury function must be considered on a case-by-case basis before determining the best procedure for a given patient. In athletes, long-term functional outcomes, return to sport, and avoidance of arthroplasty are favorable in appropriately selected individuals. Patient selection is paramount.

Sport-specific Differences in Cartilage Treatment

Articular cartilage defects in the knee are common in athletes who have a variety of loading demands across the knee. Athletes of different sports may have different baseline risk of injury. The most studied sports in terms of prevalence and treatment of cartilage injuries include soccer (football), American football, and basketball. At this time, the authors do not specifically treat patients by their sport; however, return to sports timing may be earlier in sports with fewer demands on the knee based on the rehabilitation protocol. If conservative management is unsuccessful, the authors typically perform a staging arthroscopy with chondroplasty, followed by osteochondral allograft transplantation with possible additional concomitant procedures, such as osteotomies or meniscal transplants. Athletes in a variety of sports and at high levels of competition can successfully return to sports with the appropriate considerations and treatment.

Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing Leads to Decreased Return to Sport Following Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation but Does Not Affect Return to Work

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of fear of reinjury on return to sport (RTS), return to work (RTW), and clinical outcomes following autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI).

DESIGN

A retrospective review of patients who underwent ACI with a minimum of 2 years in clinical follow-up was conducted. Patient-reported outcomes collected included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Kinesiophobia and pain catastrophizing was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), respectively. Patients were surveyed on their RTS and RTW status.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients (50.9% female) were included in our analysis. Twenty-two (38.6%) patients did not RTS. Of the 35 patients (61.4%) who returned, nearly half (48.6%) returned at a lower level of play. TSK-11 (P = 0.003), PCS (P = 0.001), and VAS pain scores (P < 0.001) were significantly greater in patients that did not RTS than in those who returned. All KOOS subscores analyzed were significantly lower (P < 0.001) in patients that did not RTS than in those who returned at the same level or higher. Of the 44 (77.2%) patients previously employed, 97.7% returned to work. Increasing TSK-11 scores were associated with lower odds of returning to sport (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Fear of reinjury decreases the likelihood that patients will return to sport after ACI. Patients that do not return to sport report significantly greater levels of fear of reinjury and pain catastrophizing and lower clinical knee outcomes. Nearly all patients were able to return to work after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV case series.

Bulk Osteochondral Allograft for a Firearm Injury to the Medial Femoral Condyle in a Military Service Member: A Case Report

A 27-year-old U.S. military active duty male sustained an accidental, self-inflicted left knee gunshot injury with an unsalvageable medial femoral condyle injury. The patient underwent bulk osteochondral allograft transplantation. Nine months post-operation, the patient was fit for full military duties with no reported functional limitations and remained on active duty. Severe knee medial femoral condyle bone loss after accidental firearm injury is uncommon. Bulk knee osteochondral allograft transplantation to the medial femoral condyle provided a successful treatment option for an active duty U.S. military member with multicompartment osteochondral defects and severe medial femoral condyle bone loss due to a gunshot injury.

Hydrogel-based immunoregulation of macrophages for tissue repair and regeneration

The rational design of hydrogel materials to modulate the immune microenvironment has emerged as a pivotal approach in expediting tissue repair and regeneration. Within the immune microenvironment, an array of immune cells exists, with macrophages gaining prominence in the field of tissue repair and regeneration due to their roles in cytokine regulation to promote regeneration, maintain tissue homeostasis, and facilitate repair. Macrophages can be categorized into two types: classically activated M1 (pro-inflammatory) and alternatively activated M2 (anti-inflammatory and pro-repair). By regulating the physical and chemical properties of hydrogels, the phenotypic transformation and cell behavior of macrophages can be effectively controlled, thereby promoting tissue regeneration and repair. A full understanding of the interaction between hydrogels and macrophages can provide new ideas and methods for future tissue engineering and clinical treatment. Therefore, this paper reviews the effects of hydrogel components, hardness, pore size, and surface morphology on cell behaviors such as macrophage proliferation, migration, and phenotypic polarization, and explores the application of hydrogels based on macrophage immune regulation in skin, bone, cartilage, and nerve tissue repair. Finally, the challenges and future prospects of macrophage-based immunomodulatory hydrogels are discussed.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee

Osteochondral injuries of the knee can be a frequent source of debilitating pain and dysfunction. Significant chondral (>1.5-2 cm2) lesions of the femoral condyles can be especially difficult to manage with nonsurgical measures. Fresh osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation has been shown to be a reliable surgical procedure to manage a wide array of high-grade focal chondral lesions, with or without subchondral bone involvement. OCA transplantation affords the transfer of a size-matched allograft of mature hyaline cartilage with its associated subchondral bony scaffold. Indications include primary or secondary management of large, high-grade chondral or osteochondral defects secondary to trauma, developmental malformation, osteonecrosis, or other focal degenerative disease. Contraindications include end-stage osteoarthritis, uncorrected malalignment, ligament or meniscus deficiency, and inflammatory joint disease. Improvements in surgical technique, allograft storage, and tissue availability have created more reproducible clinical results and increased chondrocyte viability. Long-term (>10 year) graft survival rates have been shown to be between 70% and 91%, and the procedure has been shown to be cost-effective based on cost per quality-adjusted life year. Finally, OCA transplantation has been shown to provide excellent return to play rate for athletes with medium-to-large cartilage lesions. OCA transplantation is therefore an important option in the treatment algorithm of articular cartilage injuries.

Increased kinesiophobia leads to lower return to sport rate and clinical outcomes following osteochondral allograft transplantation of the knee

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to describe the postoperative psychological state of patients following osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation in the knee and to determine whether patient-perceived kinesiophobia is associated with the rate of return to sport (RTS).

METHODS

A retrospective review of the electronic medical record at a single institution was conducted for all patients that underwent OCA transplantation from January 2010 to 2020. Patient-reported outcomes including the visual analog scale (VAS), knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) and the Tampa scale of kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) were collected. Patients were surveyed regarding their postoperative RTS status.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients (52.6% female) were included in our analysis. Overall, 24 patients (63.2%) returned to sport with 12 (50%) of these patients returning at a lower level of play. When comparing patients that return to sport to those that did not, patients that return had significantly superior KOOS pain (p = 0.019) and KOOS QOL (p = 0.011). Measures of kinesiophobia (TSK-11) were significantly higher among patients that did not return to sport (p = 0.014), while satisfaction (n.s.) and pain intensity (n.s.) were comparable between groups. Logistic regression models controlling for demographic factors, VAS pain scores and lesion size showed that for every one-point increase in TSK-11 kinesiophobia score, patients were 1.33 times more likely to return to sport at a lower level (p = 0.009). For every one-point increase in TSK-11 scores KOOS QOL decreased by 2.4 points (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Fear of reinjury decreases the likelihood that patients will return to their preoperative level of sport after OCA transplantation. Patients that do not return to sport report significantly greater fear of reinjury and inferior clinical outcomes, despite similar levels of satisfaction and pain compared to those that return.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Outcomes and Return to Sport After Knee Osteochondral Allograft Transplant in Professional Athletes

Background

Limited data are available on the outcomes and return-to-sport rates after osteochondral allograft transplant in professional athletes.

Purpose

To evaluate the experience of a single senior surgeon in treating professional athletes with osteochondral allograft transplant, including analyzing clinical outcomes and return to sport.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

The authors performed a retrospective review of professional athletes treated with primary osteochondral allograft to the knee between January 1, 2001, and January 1, 2021, by a single surgeon. Athletes were required to play at the professional level in their sport and have a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Return-to-sport rates and timing were evaluated. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at final follow-up. Reoperations and failures were also tabulated.

Results

The study included 15 professional athletes who represented a variety of sports, with follow-up at a mean of 4.91 ± 2.2 years (range, 2.0-9.4 years). The majority (8 athletes; 53%) had undergone prior surgeries to the operative knee. Eleven (73%) returned to sport at a mean of 1.22 ± 0.4 years (range, 0.75-2 years), and of the 8 undergoing isolated osteochondral allograft, 7 (87.5%) returned at 1.28 ± 0.3 years. Ten athletes (66.7% of total; 90.9% of those who returned) returned to sport at the same level or higher compared with before surgery. Significant improvements were seen in each assessed patient-reported outcome score at final follow-up. Two of the 3 (66.7%) patients who underwent concomitant meniscal allograft transplant were able to return to sport at the same level or higher than presurgery. Three (20%) underwent second-look arthroscopy, 1 (6.7%) of whom underwent cartilage debridement of the osteochondral allograft.

Conclusion

Osteochondral allograft transplant in professional athletes can result in a high rate of return to play at a similar or higher level as presurgery, even when performed with concomitant procedures such as meniscal allograft transplant. High-level athletes should expect significant postoperative improvement in clinical outcomes.

Follow-up Treatment after Cartilage Therapy of the Knee Joint - a Recommendation of the DGOU Clinical Tissue Regeneration Working Group

The first follow-up treatment recommendation from the DGOU's Clinical Tissue Regeneration working group dates back to 2012. New scientific evidence and changed framework conditions made it necessary to update the follow-up treatment recommendations after cartilage therapy.As part of a multi-stage member survey, a consensus was reached which, together with the scientific evidence, provides the basis for the present follow-up treatment recommendation.The decisive criterion for follow-up treatment is still the defect localisation. A distinction is made between femorotibial and patellofemoral defects. In addition, further criteria regarding cartilage defects are now also taken into account (stable cartilage edge, location outside the main stress zone) and the different methods of cartilage therapy (e. g. osteochondral transplantation, minced cartilage) are discussed.The present updated recommendation includes different aspects of follow-up treatment, starting with early perioperative management through to sports clearance and resumption of contact sports after cartilage therapy has taken place.

Satisfactory patient-reported outcomes in patients treated with impaction bone grafting and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral knee defects

PURPOSE

Osteochondral knee defects usually affect young, active patients and may alter knee biomechanics and progressively lead to joint degeneration. Various treatment options exist with autologous, impaction bone grafting in combination with autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (BG-AMIC) being a less-expensive, one-step, promising option. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological mid-term outcomes of large osteochondral lesions treated with BG-AMIC, identify a possible correlation between the two and report postoperative complications and reoperation rate.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 25 patients treated with the BG-AMIC technique for knee osteochondral lesions was performed. Patients were assessed using the following PROMs: the IKDC, the KOOS and the Lysholm score, the Tegner activity scale and a patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). The EQ-5D-5L score was used to assess health-related quality of life. Radiological assessment was performed using the MOCART 2.0 score on a 3 T MRI.

RESULTS

At a mean of 3.8 (± 0.8)-year follow-up, all functional scores increased significantly (p < 0.005) when compared to the preoperative baseline. IKDC increased from 44.5 (± 15.9) to 81.4 (± 14.7), KOOS from 41.5 (± 16.1) to 91.6 (± 11.6) and Lysholm from 54.4 (± 23) to 95.2 (± 5.5) (p < 0.005). The EQ-5D-5L score also revealed a significant improvement [59.9 (± 25) to 93.4 (± 10.2), p < 0.005]. Mean Tegner score reached pre-injury levels. The PASS was positive in 100% of patients. The minimum clinically important difference was reached in all PROMs except for the KOOS Sports subscale. There were no re-operations. Morphological evaluation of the repair tissue using the MOCART 2.0 score revealed a mean total score of 52.8 (± 30.5). A statistically significant, positive correlation was found between the MOCART 2.0 score and the IKDC score, the KOOS ADL subscale and the EQ-5D-5L (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

BG-AMIC is a safe and reliable option for treating deep, knee osteochondral lesions, providing a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in patient-reported outcomes. No complications were noticed, and no re-operations were performed after the procedure. A moderate positive correlation between the MOCART 2.0 score and the IKDC, KOOS ADL and EQ-5D-5L was noticed. However, this correlation is not necessarily clinically relevant, and excellent clinical results can be expected even in patients with low MOCART scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Return to Play After Knee Articular Cartilage Restoration: Surgical Options, Rehabilitation Protocols, and Performance Outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Numerous cartilage restoration techniques have proven to be effective in the treatment of articular cartilage defects. The ultimate goal of these procedures is to improve pain and function, thereby increasing the likelihood of a patient's return to physical activity. Postoperative rehabilitation is a key component for a successful and expedient return to activities. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature regarding common surgical options, rehabilitation protocols, and performance outcomes after operative treatment of articular cartilage defects.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies have demonstrated improved short- to long-term outcomes in a majority of techniques. However, the clinical benefits of microfracture are short-lived, which has led to the use of alternative procedures. Rehabilitation protocols are not standardized, but emphasis has been placed on bracing, weightbearing, early continuous passive range of motion, and strengthening to improve function. There is growing evidence to suggest that accelerated rehabilitation after matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation may result in superior outcomes compared to delayed rehabilitation. Overall, most techniques result in satisfactory rates of return to play, though existing comparative studies typically include patients with heterogeneous pathology, complicating effective synthesis of outcomes data. In appropriately selected patients, cartilage restoration procedures after articular cartilage injury result in favorable patient-reported clinical outcomes and high rates of return to play. While studies emphasize the critical role that rehabilitation plays with respect to outcomes after surgery, there are substantial inconsistencies in protocols across techniques.

Gel-Based Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (GACI) in the Chondral Defects of the Knee: An Observational Study

Introduction

Gel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (GACI) is known to have superior results when compared to conventional autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) in terms of delivery of chondrocytes to the articular cartilage surface with reproducible three-dimensional structural restoration. This study aims to evaluate the short-term outcomes of gel-based autologous chondrocyte implantation (GACI) for the treatment of large focal articular cartilage defects of the knee.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study among 25 patients who underwent GACI. Primary outcome measures included Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and IKDC score and secondary outcome measures included MRI assessment of cartilage repair using MOCART.

Results

Mean age of the population was 39.8 ± 7.5 years. The study found a highly significant improvement in both Lysholm knee score (pre-op: 45.1 to post-op: 72.4) and IKDC score (pre-op: 36.7 to post-op: 78.5) (p < 0.001) at the final follow-up of 24 months, even with the mean defect size being 4.5 ± 5.8 cm2. Postoperative MRI showed a mean MOCART score improvement from 39.4 to 67.4 at the final follow-up. No major complications were observed.

Conclusion

GACI is an effective and safe treatment option for large focal articular cartilage defects around the knee, with significant improvement in functional scores and low revision rates at medium-term follow-up.

Multiphasic scaffolds for the repair of osteochondral defects: Outcomes of preclinical studies

Osteochondral defects are caused by injury to both the articular cartilage and subchondral bone within skeletal joints. They can lead to irreversible joint damage and increase the risk of progression to osteoarthritis. Current treatments for osteochondral injuries are not curative and only target symptoms, highlighting the need for a tissue engineering solution. Scaffold-based approaches can be used to assist osteochondral tissue regeneration, where biomaterials tailored to the properties of cartilage and bone are used to restore the defect and minimise the risk of further joint degeneration. This review captures original research studies published since 2015, on multiphasic scaffolds used to treat osteochondral defects in animal models. These studies used an extensive range of biomaterials for scaffold fabrication, consisting mainly of natural and synthetic polymers. Different methods were used to create multiphasic scaffold designs, including by integrating or fabricating multiple layers, creating gradients, or through the addition of factors such as minerals, growth factors, and cells. The studies used a variety of animals to model osteochondral defects, where rabbits were the most commonly chosen and the vast majority of studies reported small rather than large animal models. The few available clinical studies reporting cell-free scaffolds have shown promising early-stage results in osteochondral repair, but long-term follow-up is necessary to demonstrate consistency in defect restoration. Overall, preclinical studies of multiphasic scaffolds show favourable results in simultaneously regenerating cartilage and bone in animal models of osteochondral defects, suggesting that biomaterials-based tissue engineering strategies may be a promising solution.

Surgical Management of Failed Articular Cartilage Surgery in the Knee

Failure rates of cartilage restoration surgery range from 14% to 43%. When failure of prior cartilage restoration surgery is suspected, a thorough clinical workup should be performed to assess the timing and duration of symptoms. Attention should be paid to patient risk factors such as age, body mass index, and smoking status. Concomitant pathology such as malalignment, ligament insufficiency, and meniscus status must be evaluated before revision surgery. As outlined in our treatment algorithm, the size/location of the lesion and the type of primary procedure will guide planning for revision procedures. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(5):262-272.].

Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoral Condyle Chondral Lesions: Microfracture Versus Liquid Bioscaffold

Purpose

This study aims to compare the microfracture (MF) technique with the bioscaffold solution application (BST-CarGel) in treating femoral chondral lesions.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients ages 18-45 with isolated single femoral condyle full-thickness (ICRS grade 3-4) chondral lesions were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups as MF applied (Group I = 21) and bioscaffold combined with MF (Group II = 17). The visual analog scale (VAS), Western-Ontario, and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were used in clinical evaluation. The location, size, and depth of lesions were evaluated with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score was used for postoperative evaluation.

Results

The mean age was 32.5 (range 19-44) years. Mean follow-up was 14.9 months (range 12-24). Lesion size was 3 cm2 in group I and 2.9 cm2 in group II. There were no differences between groups regarding demographic characteristics but BMI (Body Mass Index) was lower in group II which was significant. The duration of surgery was longer in group II (p < 0.001). Postoperative statistical significant improvements were found in WOMAC and VAS scores in groups, but there was no statistical difference. Although there was no significant radiological difference in the group II according to the MOCART score, higher scores were obtained compared to group I.

Conclusion

No difference was found, clinical and radiological, in terms of short-term outcomes. MF is a method to be applied as a primary treatment with its cost-effective, simple and short surgery technique, and effective clinical results up to 4 cm2.

Level of Evidence

Level III: retrospective comparative study.

The Evolution of Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Following Cartilage Surgery

Rehabilitation after knee cartilage repair or restoration can be a challenging and nuanced process. Historically, conservative rehabilitation protocols have been characterized by limited weightbearing and restricted range of motion (ROM) were created to primarily protect the repaired cartilage but did little for progression into higher level activity. Recent literature has supported accelerated protocols in a variety of cartilage procedures ranging from osteochondral allograft (OCA) Osteochondral autograft surgery (OATS) to matrix-based scaffolding procedures such as Matrix Induced Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) or Denovo procedures. Advances in technology such as blood flow restriction (BFR) and testing equipment with progressive rehabilitation from the acute phase through the return to sport continuum have made it possible to return to a higher level of activity and performance than first thought of for these procedures. This clinical viewpoint discusses the evolution of knee cartilage rehabilitation characterized by early but progressive weightbearing and early ROM while maintaining early homeostasis in the knee, and then its progression to return to sport and performance in the higher-level athlete.

Level of evidence

V.

Effect study of exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of knee cartilage defects in rats

BACKGROUND

The repair of articular cartilage defects has always been a difficult problem. We aimed to investigate the therapeutic effect of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma (RPR) and PRP-derived exosomes (PRP-Exos) on cartilage defects in rat knee joints and then provide experience for the use of PRP-exos in cartilage defect repair.

METHODS

Rat abdominal aortic blood was collected, and PRP was extracted by two-step centrifugation. PRP-exos were obtained by kit extraction, and PRP-exos were identified by various methods. After the rats were anesthetized, a cartilage defect subchondral bone was created at the proximal end of the origin of the femoral cruciate ligament with a drill. SD rats were divided into 4 groups, including PRP group, 50 μg/ml PRP-exos group, 5 μg/ml PRP-exos group, and control group. One week after the operation, 50 μg/ml PRP, 50 μg/ml PRP-exos, 5 μg/ml PRP-exos and normal saline were injected into the knee joint cavity of rats in each group, once a week. A total of two injections were given. On the 5th and 10th week after drug injection, the serum levels of matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP-3) and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP-1) were detected by each treatment method, respectively. The rats were killed at the 5th and 10th weeks, respectively, and the cartilage defect repair was observed and scored. The defect repair tissue sections were used for HE staining and type II collagen immunohistochemical staining.

RESULTS

The histological results showed that both PRP-exos and PRP could promote cartilage defect repair and type II collagen formation, and the promoting effect of PRP-exos was significantly better than that of PRP. In addition, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results showed that compared with PRP, PRP-exos could significantly increase serum TIMP-1 and decrease serum MMP-3 in rats. And the promoting effect of PRP-exos was concentration dependent.

CONCLUSION

Intra-articular injection of PRP-exos and PRP can promote the repair of articular cartilage defects, and the therapeutic effect of PRP-exos is better than the same concentration of PRP. PRP-exos are expected to be an effective treatment for cartilage repair and regeneration.

Return to Pivoting Sports after Cartilage Repair Surgery of the Knee: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

To perform a scoping literature review evaluating and reporting on outcomes and return to pivoting sports after cartilage procedures. For this review, the following cartilage procedures were evaluated: microfracture, osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI).

DESIGN

The scoping review incorporated articles identified using PubMed (MEDLINE), CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Screening of reference lists of included studies and forward citation tracking were performed to identify additional studies. Reported on return to pivoting sports after cartilage surgery written in English language.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The return to sports (RTS) rates after microfracture ranged from 44% to 83%, and to preinjury level from 25% to 75%. The RTS rates after OAT ranged from 87% to 100%, and to preinjury level from 67% to 93%. The RTS rates after OCA ranged from 77% to 80%, and to preinjury level 64%. The RTS rates after ACI ranged from 33% to 96%, and to preinjury level from 26% to 67%.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a high heterogeneity and range in rates of RTS in athletes participating in pivoting sports. Most studies reported high rates of RTS; however, return to preinjury level was lower. These data may be important to clinicians in shared decision making on the type of procedure to be performed and counseling pivoting sports athletes on prognosis and expected RTS rates.

Progress of Microfluidic Hydrogel-Based Scaffolds and Organ-on-Chips for the Cartilage Tissue Engineering

Cartilage degeneration is among the fundamental reasons behind disability and pain across the globe. Numerous approaches have been employed to treat cartilage diseases. Nevertheless, none have shown acceptable outcomes in the long run. In this regard, the convergence of tissue engineering and microfabrication principles can allow developing more advanced microfluidic technologies, thus offering attractive alternatives to current treatments and traditional constructs used in tissue engineering applications. Herein, the current developments involving microfluidic hydrogel-based scaffolds, promising structures for cartilage regeneration, ranging from hydrogels with microfluidic channels to hydrogels prepared by the microfluidic devices, that enable therapeutic delivery of cells, drugs, and growth factors, as well as cartilage-related organ-on-chips are reviewed. Thereafter, cartilage anatomy and types of damages, and present treatment options are briefly overviewed. Various hydrogels are introduced, and the advantages of microfluidic hydrogel-based scaffolds over traditional hydrogels are thoroughly discussed. Furthermore, available technologies for fabricating microfluidic hydrogel-based scaffolds and microfluidic chips are presented. The preclinical and clinical applications of microfluidic hydrogel-based scaffolds in cartilage regeneration and the development of cartilage-related microfluidic chips over time are further explained. The current developments, recent key challenges, and attractive prospects that should be considered so as to develop microfluidic systems in cartilage repair are highlighted.

Biological Reconstruction of Localized Full-Thickness Cartilage Defects of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Level 1 Studies with a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the best available mid- to long-term evidence of surgical procedures for the treatment of localized full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee.

DESIGN

Systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of Level 1 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), meta-analyses of RCTs and systematic reviews with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Data extracted included patient demographics, defect characteristics, clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as treatment failures.

RESULTS

Six RCTs and 3 Level 1 systematic reviews were included. Two RCTs compared microfracture (MFx) to periosteum-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI-P), 1 to matrix-associated ACI (M-ACI) and 2 to osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT). One study compared OAT to collagen membrane covered ACI (ACI-C). The 3 Level 1 systematic reviews/meta-analyses assessed the outcome of MFx, OAT, and various ACI methods in RCTs. OAT showed significantly better outcomes compared with MFx. In the 2 RCTs comparing ACI-P and MFx, no significant differences in clinical outcomes were seen, whereas significantly better outcomes were reported for M-ACI versus MFx in 1 study including patients with larger defects (5 cm²), and for ACI-C versus OAT in terms of Cincinnati Score. Higher failure rates were reported for MFx compared with OAT and for OAT compared with ACI-C, while no significant differences in failure rates were observed for ACI-P compared to MFx.

CONCLUSION

Restorative cartilage procedures (ACI-C or M-ACI and OAT) are associated with better long-term clinical outcomes including lower complication and failure rates when compared with reparative techniques (MFx). Among the restorative procedures, OAT seems to be inferior to ACI especially in larger defects after longer follow-up periods.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I: Systematic review of Level I studies.

Perioperative Thromboprophylaxis Is Associated With Lower Risk of Venous Thromboembolism After Knee Arthroscopy

PURPOSE

To determine the rate of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients undergoing arthroscopic knee procedures, risk factors associated with postoperative VTE, and current perioperative thromboprophylaxis prescription patterns associated with this population in the United States.

METHODS

Medical records for patients ≥18 years of age were queried from the Mariner database using Current Procedural Terminology codes for knee arthroscopy performed in the United States from 2010 to 2020 in this cross-sectional study. Patients who received thromboprophylaxis and those diagnosed with VTE, including deep-vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, within 90 days of surgery were identified using International Classification of Diseases and National Drug Codes. Two multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify VTE risk factors and likelihood of perioperative thromboprophylaxis. Covariates included procedure type, age, oral contraceptive pill (OCP) use, and medical comorbidities.

RESULTS

A total of 718,289 patients met inclusion criteria and 7,618 patients (1.06%) experienced VTE, including deep-vein thrombosis (n = 6,394, 0.9%) and/or pulmonary embolism (n = 2,211, 0.3%). A total of 10,769 patients (1.5%) filled perioperative thromboprophylaxis, including aspirin (n = 5,353, 0.7%), low-molecular-weight heparin (n = 4,563, 0.6%), and oral factor Xa inhibitors (n = 947, 0.1%). Perioperative thromboprophylaxis was associated with decreased odds of experiencing VTE (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.80). Procedure types categorized as moderate-to-greater risk were associated with increased odds of VTE (aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.34-1.50). OCP use (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.38-1.91), obesity (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.24), renal disease (aOR 1.33, 95% CI 1.18-1.50) and congestive heart failure (aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.50) were associated with increased odds of VTE.

CONCLUSIONS

While the overall rate of symptomatic VTE following knee arthroscopy remains low, procedure types that are more complex and generally require restrictive rehabilitation protocols, OCP use, obesity, renal disease, and congestive heart failure are associated with increased odds of postoperative VTE. Conversely, the use of perioperative thromboprophylaxis is associated with significantly lower VTE risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation

Background:

Articular cartilage lesions are a significant cause of morbidity and impaired knee function, and attempts to surgically repair damaged cartilage have failed to reliably reproduce native cartilage. Thus, osteochondral allograft transplantation is an effective one-step procedure to repair large cartilage defects.

Indications:

Osteochondral allograft transplantation is indicated for young active patients with large focal defects, those with a history of previous cartilage repair, and those with cartilage-related degenerative disorders such as osteonecrosis, osteochondritis dissecans, and/or post-traumatic osteochondral defects.

Technique Description:

In short, after the focal chondral defect is identified, a socket is created with specific dimensions in depth and diameter. The donor cartilage is then secured in a graft station, and a sizing guide is placed through a bushing to confirm the allograft harvest location. Using stabilization from the graft station arm, a coring reamer is then advanced through the donor cartilage, and a saw is used to allow for easy removal of the graft from the donor condyle. The plug is then fashioned to fit the exact dimensions of the socket created earlier in the procedure. A cut on the donor plug is made to fashion the plug to the appropriate depth. A rongeur is used to make the plug more bullet shaped at the end to allow the plug to enter the socket more easily. Small holes are then drilled into the base of the socket to help promote incorporation of the plug into the socket during the healing process. After the socket is irrigated, the plug is then placed into the socket, and a tamp is used to gently tap the cartilage until it is flush with the surrounding surface.

Results:

After an appropriate rehabilitation protocol is followed for up to 10 months postoperatively, osteochondral allograft transplantation allows for near-to-complete restoration of patient functionality and strength, with return to full activity possible within 1 year.

Conclusion:

Acute repair of large focal chondral defects is effective in restoring knee strength and functionality and is associated with high patient satisfaction. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: 5-Year Results in 355 Consecutive Ankles

Background:

Arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) has shown good functional outcomes in the short and long term.

Purpose:

To investigate 5-year radiographic and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic microfracture in treatment of OLT and the effectiveness of adjunct therapies including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA).

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

We prospectively enrolled 432 patients who underwent arthroscopic microfracture for OLT from May 1, 2011, to May 31, 2015. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and weightbearing radiographs were performed annually after the initial surgery. The MOCART (magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue) score was used to evaluate the structure of the repaired cartilage on MRI, and patient-reported outcomes (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale [AOFAS] and the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score) were collected annually. The primary outcome measure was 5-year AOFAS score. We recorded baseline characteristics including age, body mass index (BMI), and lesion size, and other potentially related factors including number of PRP/HA injection and change in BMI from baseline.

Results:

Included were 355 patients, all with minimum 5-year follow-up data. The overall reoperation rate was 9.0% (32 of 355). According to multivariable analysis, 5-year AOFAS scores were associated with number of PRP injections (correlation coefficient, 3.12 [95% CI, 2.36 to 3.89]; P < .001), BMI at baseline (correlation coefficient, -0.222 [95% CI, -0.363 to -0.082]; P = .002), and mean BMI change from baseline (correlation coefficient, -1.15 [95% CI, -1.32 to -0.98]; P < .001). When comparing number of PRP injections (0, 1-2, or ≥3), we found that patients who had serial PRP injection (≥3 with at least a 3-month interval between injections) had diminished functional and radiographic deterioration over time.

Conclusion:

Arthroscopic microfracture improved patient-reported and structural outcomes for patients with OLT at 5 years after surgery. Serial PRP injections and reduction in BMI from baseline were able to slow radiographic and functional deterioration. Future trials regarding the combination of microfracture and PRP in treatment of OLT should focus on the efficacy of longer term, intra-articular, serial injections of PRP instead of single injections.

Advances in Biomaterial-Mediated Gene Therapy for Articular Cartilage Repair

Articular cartilage defects caused by various reasons are relatively common in clinical practice, but the lack of efficient therapeutic methods remains a substantial challenge due to limitations in the chondrocytes’ repair abilities. In the search for scientific cartilage repair methods, gene therapy appears to be more effective and promising, especially with acellular biomaterial-assisted procedures. Biomaterial-mediated gene therapy has mainly been divided into non-viral vector and viral vector strategies, where the controlled delivery of gene vectors is contained using biocompatible materials. This review will introduce the common clinical methods of cartilage repair used, the strategies of gene therapy for cartilage injuries, and the latest progress.

Minimum 5-Year Outcomes of Osteochondral Autograft Transplantation with a Concomitant High Tibial Osteotomy for Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Knee with a Large Lesion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT) with concomitant high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK) with a large lesion.

DESIGN

A total of 48 knees of 48 consecutive patients with SONK (lesion size ≥4 cm², no age criteria) who underwent opening wedge HTO and concomitant OAT were retrospectively investigated, and those who were followed up postoperatively for at least 5 years were included in this case series study. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using knee and function scores of Knee Society Score, radiographic outcomes were evaluated using the anatomical femorotibial angle (FTA), and these outcomes were compared between patients aged ≥70 years and <70 years.

RESULTS

Of the 48 cases, a total of 43 cases were available for review at a minimum of 5 years, and 5 cases were excluded from the analysis. Overall, the mean knee score improved from preoperative 48.8 ± 13.3 to postoperative 87.9 ± 8.6 at 1 year (P < 0.05) and 85.0 ± 10.4 at final follow-up (P < 0.05 vs. preop., N.S. vs. 1 year). The mean function score also improved from preoperative 60.1 ± 10.9 to postoperative 87.3 ± 12.2 at 1 year (P < 0.05) and 84.2 ± 12.4 at final follow-up (P < 0.05 vs. preop., N.S. vs. 1 year). The mean standing FTA was corrected significantly from 181.1° ± 2.7° preoperatively to 169.7° ± 2.4° at 1 year (P < 0.05) and 169.4° ± 3.1° at final follow-up (P < 0.05 vs. preop., N.S. vs. 1 year). There were no significant differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients aged ≥70 years and <70 years. There were 4 cases of lateral hinge fracture around the osteotomy site and 1 case of delayed union. None of the patients underwent revision surgery during the follow-up period (survival rate of 100%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mid-term clinical outcomes of patients with SONK who underwent HTO and OAT with a relatively large lesion were good.

Treatment of Cartilage Defects of the Knee in Military Tactical Athletes: An Overview of Management and Clinical Outcomes

Cartilage defects of the knee are a common problem that can be caused by trauma or chronic repetitive overload and result in debilitating functional limitations. These consequences are of particular significance to military service members, who, by in large, are a group of young, active individuals with professional duties requiring full, unrestricted activity and function. The burden of knee chondral-related disease among military tactical athletes is well established, and systematic approach to the evaluation of a military member with suspected knee chondral pathology facilitates the execution of a surgical procedure that maximizes the likelihood of a return to duty. Despite advances in cartilage restoration surgery, chondral pathology of the knee remains a vexing problem and an omnipresent threat to military medical readiness and warfighter lethality.

Surgical therapy in osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To provide an evidence-based overview of the different surgical procedures in osteoarthritis (OA).

DESIGN

This narrative review reports on surgical therapies (1) for severe, end stage OA and (2) of surgical options aiming to possibly reduce OA development earlier in the course of the disease.

RESULTS

Surgical practice guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations to assist in the clinical decision-making. Total joint arthroplasty represents the only valuable, established surgical option for severe, end stage OA. For hip and knee OA, it is by far the most common surgical procedure and provides considerable pain relief, functional restoration, and improved quality of life. Surgical therapy aiming to postpone OA essentially addresses extra- or intraarticular pre-osteoarthritic deformities, defined as congenital or acquired disturbances of the joint structure that adversely affect its function. Approaches in this category include osteotomies and different cartilage repair procedures such as osteochondral autograft and allograft transfer, marrow stimulation techniques, and autologous chondrocyte implantation. However, they are not only less commonly performed than arthroplasty, but the scientific clinical evidence in favour of this type of surgery to reduce the long-term risk of developing OA is considerably reduced.

CONCLUSION

Total knee and hip arthroplasty are two of the most successful procedures in all of medicine. As the progression of this insidious disease is often asymptomatic and slow, it is imperative to judge reparative procedures at their potential to reduce OA development at long-term, besides their primary clinical outcomes. Evidence-based guidelines provide a valuable tool for high-quality surgical decision making in OA.

Assessment of Outcomes After Multisurface Osteochondral Allograft Transplantations in the Knee

Background

Treatment of multisurface articular cartilage lesions of the knee is a challenging problem.

Hypothesis

Large multisurface cartilage defects in the knee can be successfully managed with transplantation of high chondrocyte viability osteochondral allografts (OCAs) to result in statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures of pain and function.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Patients were prospectively enrolled into a registry to follow outcomes after OCA transplantation. The study included patients who received OCA transplantation for multisurface unipolar defects in 1 knee and had minimum 2-year follow-up data, including patient-reported outcome measures, failures, reoperations, and complications. The OCA transplants had been stored using 2 methods: standard preservation (SP) or Missouri Osteochondral Preservation System (MOPS). Preoperative data were compared with outcomes at 1 year and final follow-up, and risk factors for revision surgery or failure (total knee arthroplasty) were analyzed.

Results

The sample included 25 patients with a mean age of 37.2 years (range, 13-51 years), body mass index of 27.7 (range, 18-38), and follow-up of 45.1 months (median, 49 months; range, 24-68 months). OCAs stored using SP were transplanted into 6 patients, and those stored using MOPS were transplanted into 19 patients. The initial success rate was significantly higher for MOPS OCAs (94.7%) than SP OCAs (33.3%). There were statistically significant improvements in all patient-reported outcomes at 1 year and final follow-up in the MOPS cohort (P < .0001 for all). Revision surgery/failure was significantly associated with patients who were nonadherent to the prescribed postoperative restrictions and rehabilitation protocols (P = .038; odds ratio = 13.5) and with OCAs that had a viable chondrocyte density <70% of the established reference range mean at transplantation (P = .0037; odds ratio = 76).

Conclusion

OCA transplantation for treatment of large multisurface cartilage defects in the knee resulted in a 94.7% initial success rate when grafts with high viable chondrocyte density (≥70%) were used and when patients strictly adhered to prescribed postoperative rehabilitation protocols. Successful outcomes were associated with statistically significant improvements in patient-reported outcome measures of pain and function.

Good medium-term functional results in reconstruction of lateral femoral condyle osteochondral lesions

INTRODUCTION

Results of autologous osteochondral graft (mosaicplasty) are well-reported for the medial femoral condyle but much less for the lateral femoral condyle. The main aim of the present study was to assess results specifically for lateral condyle reconstruction. The secondary objective was to compare results according to the two main etiologies: osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) and osteochondral fracture (OCF).

HYPOTHESIS

The study hypothesis was that medium-term functional and radiological results of lateral femoral condyle autologous osteochondral graft are good.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective continuous study included 24 patients with symptomatic focal lateral femoral condyle osteochondral lesion treated by osteochondral autograft, at a minimum 24 months' follow-up. Mosaicplasty was performed for lesions <200 mm², with associated fixation for lesions >200 mm² with viable osteochondral fragments. IKDC, Lysholm and KOOS functional scores and pain on visual analog scale (VAS) were collected at last follow-up. Progression toward osteoarthritis was assessed on comparative X-ray.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were analyzed (11 OCD, 9 OCF) at a mean of 66.4±44 months. Mean pain on VAS was 1.8±2 out of 10. Mean subjective IKDC, Lysholm and global KOOS scores were respectively 68.1±26, 76.5±22 and 73.9±21. Two patients showed Ahlbäck grade 2 lateral femorotibial osteoarthritis. Functional results were comparable between OCD and OCF.

CONCLUSION

Reconstruction of lateral femoral condyle osteochondral lesion by osteochondral autograft gave good medium-term functional results, whatever the etiology. Longer-term studies are needed to assess progression toward osteoarthritis and functional deterioration over time.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective study.

Biomaterials for meniscus and cartilage in knee surgery: state of the art

Meniscus and cartilage injuries of the knee joint lead to cartilage degeneration and osteoarthritis (OA). The research on biomaterials and artificial implants as substitutes in reconstruction and regeneration has become a main international focus in order to solve clinical problems such as irreparable meniscus injury, postmeniscectomy syndrome, osteochondral lesions and generalised chronic OA. In this review, we provide a summary of biomaterials currently used in clinical practice as well as state-of-the-art tissue engineering strategies and technologies that are developed for articular cartilage and meniscus repair and regeneration. The literature was reviewed over the last 5 years on clinically used meniscus and cartilage repair biomaterials, such as Collagen Meniscal Implant, Actifit, NUsurface, TruFit, Agili-C and MaioRegen. There are clinical advantages for these biomaterials and the application of these treatment options should be considered individually. Standardised evaluation protocols are needed for biological and mechanical assessment and comparison between different scaffolds, and long-term randomised independent clinical trials with large study numbers are needed to provide more insight into the use of these biomaterials. Surgeons should become familiar and stay up to date with evolving repair options to improve their armamentarium for meniscal and cartilage defects.

Biologic Joint Restoration: A Translational Research Success Story

Treatment options that result in consistently successful outcomes for young and active patients with joint disorders are needed. This article summarizes two decades of rigorous research using a bedside-to-bench- to-bedside translational approach based on the One Health - One Medicine concept that culminated in successful clinical use of biologic joint restoration options for treatment of knee, hip, ankle, and shoulder problems in this growing patient population.

Clinical and quality-of-life outcomes of a combined synthetic scaffold and autogenous tissue graft procedure for articular cartilage repair in the knee

Background

Injuries to the articular cartilage of the knee often fail to heal properly due to the hypocellular and avascular nature of this tissue. Subsequent disability can limit participation in sports and decrease quality of life. Subchondral bone perforations are used for the treatment of small defects. Filling out the central portion in larger lesions becomes difficult, and scaffolds can be used as adjuvants, providing a matrix onto which the defect can be filled in completely. Also, autogenous cartilage grafts can be combined, acting as an inducer and improving healing quality, all in a single procedure.

Methods

This observational study evaluated the clinical and quality-of-life outcomes of patients with articular cartilage lesions of the knee undergoing repair via a microfracture technique combined with a synthetic scaffold and autogenous cartilage graft, with transosseous sutures and fibrin glue fixation, at 12 months of follow-up. Secondarily, it assessed whether combined procedures, previous surgical intervention, traumatic aetiology, lesion location, and age affect outcomes. The sample consisted of adult patients (age 18–66 years) with symptoms consistent with chondral or osteochondral lesions, isolated or multiple, ICRS grade III/IV, 2–12 cm² in size. Patients with corrected angular deviations or instabilities were included. Those with BMI > 40 kg/m², prior total or subtotal (> 30%) meniscectomy, second-look procedures, and follow-up < 6 months were excluded. Pain (VAS), physical activity (IKDC), osteoarthritis (WOMAC), and general quality of life (SF-36) were assessed.

Results

64 procedures were included, comprising 60 patients. There was significant improvement (P < 0.05) in VAS score (5.92–2.37), IKDC score (33.44–56.33), and modified WOMAC score (53.26–75.93) after surgery. The SF-36 showed significant improvements in the physical and mental domains (30.49–40.23 and 46.43–49.84 respectively; both P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Combination of microfractures, autogenous crushed cartilage graft, synthetic scaffold, and transosseous sutures with fibrin glue provides secure fixation for treatment of articular cartilage lesions of the knee. At 12-month follow-up, function had improved by 20 points on the IKDC and WOMAC, and quality of life, by 10 points on the SF-36. Age > 45 years had a negative impact on outcomes.

[Surgical treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee : Indications, techniques, modifications and results]

The treatment strategies for focal cartilage damage in the knee are multifarious. For established procedures, such as microfracturing (MFX), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC), osteochondral transplantation (OCT) and autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT), well-founded, partly comparative long-term studies and overlapping size-dependent differential indications are available. Innovative cell sources, the utilization of biological scaffolds as well as biologic agents and various combinations, have recently become the focus of scientific attention; however, high regulatory demands are restricting their use in Germany. The success of every procedure is dependent on the appropriate indications, the treatment of comorbidities, such as axis deviations or ligamentous instability, the surgeon's experience and an adequate follow-up treatment.

Rehabilitation, Restrictions, and Return to Sport After Cartilage Procedures

The ability to return to sport (RTS) after articular cartilage injury is of vital importance to athletes. Discussing the likelihood of returning to sport with patients is necessary, yet patients should be informed of the heterogeneous nature of the variables associated with successful RTS and the methodologic limitations behind current RTS rate estimates. Patient-specific factors affecting RTS are numerous and, in most cases, their isolated effect on RTS rates have yet to be examined and will remain difficult to do so. The purpose of this review is to discuss current RTS rates, explore factors leading to successful RTS, and examine the variability in physical therapy protocols after cartilage procedures, including microfracture, osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), and meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). The senior author’s postoperative protocols will also be presented, as with a discussion on using RTS as a metric of patient and procedural success. Overall, there is significant variation in reported RTS rates among procedures examined, and providers must continue managing patient expectations when discussing treatment options.

Algorithm for Treatment of Focal Cartilage Defects of the Knee: Classic and New Procedures

OBJECTIVE

To create a treatment algorithm for focal grade 3 or 4 cartilage defects of the knee using both classic and novel cartilage restoration techniques.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed highlighting classic as well as novel cartilage restoration techniques supported by clinical and/or basic science research and currently being employed by orthopedic surgeons.

RESULTS

There is a high level of evidence to support the treatment of small to medium size lesions (<2-4 cm2) without subchondral bone involvement with traditional techniques such as marrow stimulation, osteochondral autograft transplant (OAT), or osteochondral allograft transplant (OCA). Newer techniques such as autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis and bone marrow aspirate concentrate implantation have also been shown to be effective in select studies. If subchondral bone loss is present OAT or OCA should be performed. For large lesions (>4 cm2), OCA or matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) may be performed. OCA is preferred over MACI in the setting of subchondral bone involvement while cell-based modalities such as MACI or particulated juvenile allograft cartilage are preferred in the patellofemoral joint.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous techniques exist for the orthopedic surgeon treating focal cartilage defects of the knee. Treatment strategies should be based on lesion size, lesion location, subchondral bone involvement, and the level of evidence supporting each technique in the literature.

Consensus on Rehabilitation Guidelines among Orthopedic Surgeons in the United States following Use of Third-Generation Articular Cartilage Repair (MACI) for Treatment of Knee Cartilage Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate levels of consensus in rehabilitation practices following MACI (autologous cultured chondrocytes on porcine collagen membrane) treatment based on the experience of an expert panel of U.S. orthopedic surgeons.

DESIGN

A list of 24 questions was devised based on the current MACI rehabilitation protocol, literature review, and discussion with orthopedic surgeons. Known areas of variability were used to establish 4 consensus domains, stratified on lesion location (tibiofemoral [TF] or patellofemoral [PF]), including weightbearing (WB), range of motion (ROM), return to work/daily activities of living, and return to sports. A 3-step Delphi technique was used to establish consensus.

RESULTS

Consensus (>75% agreement) was achieved on all 4 consensus domains. Time to full WB was agreed as immediate (with bracing) for PF patients (dependent on concomitant procedures), and 7 to 9 weeks in TF patients. A progression for ROM was agreed that allowed patients to reach 90° by week 4, with subsequent progression as tolerated. The panel estimated that the time to full ROM would be 7 to 9 weeks on average. A range of time was established for release to activities of daily living, work, and sports, dependent on lesion and patient characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

Good consensus was established among a panel of U.S. surgeons for rehabilitation practices following MACI treatment of knee cartilage lesions. The consensus of experts can aid surgeons and patients in the expectations and rehabilitation process as MACI surgery becomes more prevalent in the United States.

Differences in the Demographics and Preferred Management of Knee Cartilage Injuries in Soccer Players Across FIFA Centers of Excellence

OBJECTIVE

We sought to report on the demographics and epidemiology of knee cartilage injuries and preferred management in soccer players, across FIFA Medical Centers of Excellence (FMCE).

DESIGN

A descriptive questionnaire focusing on characteristics of knee cartilage injuries and their management in soccer players during the 10-year period prior to the distribution of the questionnaire was sent to all FMCE around the world in September 2019 via an online platform. Voluntary responses from centers were processed and analyzed. Descriptive characteristics were reported using median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables and frequencies and percentages (%) for discrete variables.

RESULTS

A total of 15 centers from 5 continents responded to the questionnaire and reported on a total of 4526 soccer players. Among centers, the median age was 27 years (IQR: 23-38), the median rate of male players was 75% (IQR: 68-90), and the median rate of professional players was 10% (IQR: 5-23). The most common reported etiology for cartilage injury was traumatic (median 40%, IQR: 13-73). The most common nonoperative treatment utilized was physical therapy (median 90%, IQR: 51%-100%) and the most common operative treatment utilized was bone marrow stimulation/micro-fracture (median 40%, IQR: 19-54%). The utilization of other cartilage restoration procedures varied across centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight different tendencies in the management of these injuries across FMCE and emphasize the need for collaborative efforts focusing on establishing consensus guidelines for the optimal management of these challenging injuries in soccer players.

Prospective Outcomes of Cryopreserved Osteochondral Allograft for Patellofemoral Cartilage Defects at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical outcomes, knee function, and activity level of patients after treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects involving the patellofemoral compartment of the knee with cryopreserved osteochondral allograft.

DESIGN

Nineteen patients with cartilage defects involving the patellofemoral compartment were treated. The average age was 31 years (range 15-45 years), including 12 females and 7 males. Patients were prospectively followed using validated clinical outcome measures including Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey (VR-12), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Tegner activity scale. Graft incorporation was evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or second-look arthroscopy.

RESULTS

The cartilage defects included the patella (n = 16) and the femoral trochlea (n = 3). Mean VR-12 scores increased from 31.6 to 46.3 (P < 0.01), mean IKDC increased from 40.0 to 69.7 (P < 0.01), mean KOOS increased from 53.9 to 80.2 (P < 0.01), and mean Tegner scores increased from 3.0 to 4.9 (P < 0.01), at average follow-up of 41.9 months (range 24-62 months). Of the 3 patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy, all demonstrated a well-incorporated graft. Mean MOCART score for the 6 patients with follow-up MRI was 62.5 (range 25-85). The reoperation rate was 21.1% and 2 patients (12.5%) experienced progressive patellofemoral osteoarthritis requiring conversion to patellofemoral arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Patients with unipolar cartilage defects involving the patellofemoral compartment of the knee can have positive outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up after surgical treatment with a cryopreserved osteochondral allograft when concomitant pathology is also addressed, but the reoperation rate is high and bipolar cartilage lesions may increase the failure rate.

Rehabilitation Variability Following Femoral Condyle and Patellofemoral Microfracture Surgery of the Knee

OBJECTIVE

To assess the variability of postoperative rehabilitation protocols used by orthopedic surgery residency programs for microfracture of femoral condyle and patellofemoral lesions of the knee.

DESIGN

Online postoperative microfracture rehabilitation protocols from US orthopedic programs and the scientific literature were reviewed. A custom scoring rubric was developed to analyze each protocol for the presence of discrete rehabilitation modalities and the timing of each intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 18 programs (11.6%) from 155 US academic orthopedic programs' published online protocols and a total of 44 protocols were analyzed. Seventeen protocols (56.7%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for femoral condyle lesions and 17 (89.5%) recommended immediate postoperative bracing for patellofemoral lesions. The average time to permitting weight-bearing as tolerated (WBAT) was 6.1 weeks (range, 0-8) for femoral condyle lesions and 3.7 weeks (range, 0-8 weeks) for patellofemoral lesions. There was considerable variation in the inclusion and timing of strength, proprioception, agility, and pivoting exercises. For femoral condyle lesions, 10 protocols (33.3%) recommended functional testing prior to return to sport at an average of 23.3 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks). For patellofemoral lesions, 4 protocols (20.0%) recommended functional testing for return to sport at an average of 21.0 weeks postoperatively (range, 12-32 weeks).

CONCLUSION

A minority of US academic orthopedic programs publish microfracture rehabilitation protocols online. Among the protocols currently available, there is significant variability in the inclusion of specific rehabilitation components and timing of many modalities. Evidence-based standardization of elements of postoperative rehabilitation may help improve patient care and subsequent outcomes.

Arthroscopic Osteochondral Autograft Transfer System Procedure of the Lateral Femoral Condyle with Donor-Site Backfill Using Osteochondral Allograft Plug

The osteochondral autograft transfer system (OATS) procedure is at the forefront of cartilage restoration surgeries of the knee, offering superior return to sport rates and long-term functionality. This technique reports an arthroscopic OATS procedure of the lateral femoral condyle with donor-site backfill using an osteochondral allograft plug. Potential complications from unfilled donor site sockets are eliminated through donor site backfill with an allograft plug.

Functional Outcomes and Return to Sport After Cartilage Restoration of the Knee in High-level Athletes

Articular cartilage injuries of the knee are being observed with increasing frequency in athletes and have proven to be difficult to treat given the limited regenerative ability of cartilage and the potential for progressive joint degeneration. A wide range of surgical treatments such as microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and osteochondral autograft and allograft have demonstrated promising results in these high-demand individuals. These procedures permit healing of cartilage defects while decreasing pain and restoring function with patient-reported outcomes demonstrating significant improvement at short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up. Most athletes are able to return to play after cartilage restoration of the knee, regardless of the surgical technique used. Although there is a large degree of heterogeneity across the literature and no consensus as to the optimal technique, osteochondral autograft transfer seems to offer the highest rate of return to sport and return to play at preinjury level. However, autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral allograft transplantation are often used for larger defects or salvage after previous procedures, so results may be confounded. In addition, a multitude of factors including patient history, characteristics of the chondral lesion, and postoperative management may affect functional outcomes in athletes.

[Surgical treatment of focal cartilage defects in the knee : Indications, techniques, modifications and results]

The treatment strategies for focal cartilage damage in the knee are multifarious. For established procedures, such as microfracturing (MFX), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC), osteochondral transplantation (OCT) and autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT), well-founded, partly comparative long-term studies and overlapping size-dependent differential indications are available. Innovative cell sources, the utilization of biological scaffolds as well as biologic agents and various combinations, have recently become the focus of scientific attention; however, high regulatory demands are restricting their use in Germany. The success of every procedure is dependent on the appropriate indications, the treatment of comorbidities, such as axis deviations or ligamentous instability, the surgeon's experience and an adequate follow-up treatment.