Articular surface mounted navigated total knee arthroplasty improves the reliability of component alignment

Comparison of the radiographic outcomes and total blood loss between pinless navigation and conventional method in minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty

Background

Computer-assisted surgical navigation has been used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures for years trying to the accuracy of prosthesis placement. We conducted this prospective randomized clinical trial to compare the accuracy of the radiographic parameters of the prosthesis, total blood loss (TBL), and related complications, between a new pinless navigation system (Stryker OrthoMap Express Knee Navigation) and conventional method in patients undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) TKA procedures.

Patient and methods

A consecutive series of 100 patients underwent unilateral primary TKA were randomly assigned into two groups: navigation group and convention group. The radiographic parameters of the knee implant and the alignment of lower limb were measured at 3 months after surgery. TBL was calculated according to Nadler’s method. The duplex ultrasonography of both lower limbs was performed in all patients to detect the presence of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT).

Results

Totally, 94 patients have completed the radiographic measures. Only the coronal femoral component angle in the navigation group (89.12° ± 1.83°) had significant differences from that in the convention group (90.09° ± 2.18°) (p = 0.022). There were no differences in the rate of outliers. The mean TBL in the navigation group was 841 ± 267 mL, which was similar to that in the convention group at 860 ± 266 mL (p = 0.721). Postoperative DVT risk did not differ between the two groups (2% vs. 0%, p = 0.315).

Conclusion

This pinless navigation TKA showed a comparable acceptable alignment compared with conventional MIS-TKA. There were no differences regarding postoperative TBL between the two groups.

Preoperative Anemia Is Associated With Worse Joint-Specific Postoperative Outcomes, but Is Not Associated With Health-Related Quality of Life or Patient Satisfaction After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The primary aim assessed whether preoperative anemia was associated with a worse knee-specific functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aims assessed the association of preoperative anemia with generic health and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to compare patients who did and did not have anemia (Hb <13.0 g/dL for men and Hb <11.5 g/dL for women). During a 1-year period, 497 patients underwent a total knee arthroplasty with complete preoperative and postoperative data, including 215 (43.3%) men and 282 (56.7%) women, who had a mean age of 70 years (range 45-93). Patient demographics, comorbidities, preoperative and postoperative (1 year) Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D), postoperative Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and patient satisfaction were collected. Regression analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors between the groups.

RESULTS

The 56 (11.3%) patients who had anemia were older (4.6 years, P < .001) and more likely to have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = .004), connective tissue (P = .047), or kidney disease (P = .011) compared to those who did not have anemia. There were no differences in the preoperative OKS (P = .752) or EQ-5D (P = .762) scores between the groups. When adjusting for confounding differences, there was a significantly lower postoperative OKS (-3.0 points, P = .035) and FJS (-11.6 points, P = .011) associated with the anemia group. There were no significant differences in the EQ-5D (P = .118) or patient satisfaction between groups (odds ratio 0.84, P = .976).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative anemia is associated with a lower postoperative joint-specific functional outcome. It is not clear if these differences are clinically meaningful. No difference in patient satisfaction was observed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

No consistent association between patient-reported outcome measures and coronal alignment following total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty is a common procedure for treating knee conditions; however, significant proportions of patients report dissatisfaction post-operatively. Recent data suggests accurate coronal alignment may not be essential for optimizing prosthesis functionality and survivorship. This narrative review utilized a systematic approach to analyse the literature comparing post-operative coronal alignment and PROMs following knee replacement.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE was utilized to identify publications that directly compare the relationship between coronal alignment and PROMs.

RESULTS

Thirty-one eligible publications were identified. Variability in both study design and findings were observed, with no studies being without risk of bias.

CONCLUSION

Given this variability and lack of consensus among the reported publications, current literature is ill-equipped to describe the exact nature of the relationship between coronal alignment and PROMs following TKA. Further research would ideally utilize both validated generic, and knee-specific PROMs, make use of pre-operative outcome data, and standardized follow-up to develop reliable assessments of coronal alignment and its impact upon both functionality and quality of life.

Navigated and Robot-Assisted Technology in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do Outcome Differences Achieve Minimal Clinically Important Difference?

BACKGROUND

In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), computer-assisted navigation (N-TKA) and robotic-assisted methods (RA-TKA) are intended to increase precision of mechanical and component alignment. However, the clinical significance of published patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) differences in comparison to conventional TKA (C-TKA) is unknown.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to identify all studies reporting perioperative PROMs for either primary N-TKA or RA-TKA with a C-TKA comparison cohort with a minimum 1-year follow-up. Relative improvements in PROMs for the two cohorts were compared to published minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values.

RESULTS

After systematic review, 21 studies (N = 3,214) reporting on N-TKA and eight studies (N = 1,529) reporting on RA-TKA met inclusion criteria. Eighteen of 20 studies (90%) reported improved radiographic outcomes with N-TKA relative to C-TKA; five of five studies reported improved radiographic outcomes with RA-TKA relative to C-TKA. Five of 21 studies (24%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in clinical PROMs for N-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas only two (10%) achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. One of 8 studies (13%) reported statistically significant greater improvements in PROMs for RA-TKA relative to C-TKA, whereas none achieved clinical significance relative to MCID on a secondary analysis. No studies reported a significant difference in revision rates.

CONCLUSION

While most studies comparing RA-TKA and N-TKA with C-TKA demonstrate improved radiographic alignment outcomes, a minority of studies reported PROM differences that achieve clinical significance. Future studies should report data and be interpreted in the context of clinical significance to establish patient and surgeon expectations for emerging technologies.

Robotic- and orthosensor-assisted versus manual (ROAM) total knee replacement: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Robotic-arm-assisted knee arthroplasty allows for more accurate component positioning and alignment and is associated with better patient-reported outcomes compared to manually performed jig-based knee arthroplasty. However, what is not known is whether the addition of an intra-articular sensor (Verasense^TM) to aid intraoperative balancing of the total knee replacement (TKR) offers improved functional outcomes for the patient. The purpose of this research is to compare the outcomes of patients undergoing a conventional manual knee replacement to those undergoing TKR using robotic-assisted surgery and the Verasense^TM to optimise alignment and balance the knee joint, respectively, and assess the associated cost economics of such technology.

Methods and analysis

This randomised controlled trial will include 90 patients with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee undergoing primary TKR. Patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria that consent to be in the study will be randomised at a ratio of 1:1 to either manual TKR (standard of care) or robotic-arm-assisted TKR with Verasense^TM to aid balancing of the knee. The primary objective will be functional improvement at 6 months following surgery between the two groups. The secondary objectives are to compare changes in knee-specific function, joint awareness, patient expectation and fulfilment, satisfaction, pain, stiffness and functional ability, health-related quality of life, cost-effectiveness, and gait patterns between the two groups. Ethical approval was obtained by the Tyne & Wear South Research Ethics Committee, UK. The study is sponsored by the Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Discussion

This study will assess whether the improved accuracy of component positioning using the robotic-arm-assisted surgery and the Verasense^TM to aid balancing of the TKR offers improved outcome relative to standard manual jig-based systems that are currently the standard of care. This will be assessed primarily according to knee-specific function, but several other measures will also be assessed including whether these are cost-effective interventions.

Trial registration

International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number ISRCTN47889316 10.1186/ISRCTN47889316. Registered on 25 November 2019

Date and version for protocol

ROAM Protocol V1.0 (13-12-2018)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05936-9.

True Mechanical Alignment is Found Only on Full-Limb and not on Standard Anteroposterior Radiographs

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare alignment measured on standard anteroposterior (AP) radiographs versus full-length weight-bearing radiographs.

Methods

Patients were prospectively enrolled from June 2019 to August 2019 from a single orthopedic surgeon's practice if they were ≥ 18 years of age, obtained both AP and full-length alignment radiographs and were capable of full weight-bearing with appropriate positioning. Patients were excluded if they were < 18 years of age, had previous knee arthroplasty, previous knee or hip osteotomy, were unable to bear full weight on both limbs, and if the patient's body habitus precluded appropriate visualization of necessary landmarks on the radiographs. Tibiofemoral angles were measured on AP radiographs using 2 techniques (AP angles 1 and 2). Linear regression and paired t tests were used to compare measurements. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as < 2°.

Results

There were 120 patients (62 males, 58 females) with an average age of 45 ± 17 years who were enrolled. There were positive correlations between average alignment on full-length weight-bearing and AP radiographs for AP angle 1 (r = 0.72) and AP angle 2 (r = 0.76) measurement techniques (P < .001). There was a significant difference in mean alignment between full-length weight-bearing and AP measurements (AP angle 1: 2.5° difference; AP angle 2: 4.4° difference; P < .001). Frequency distributions for the minimal clinically important difference between true mechanical alignment and AP views demonstrated that 46.7% of patients had ≥ 2° difference for AP angle 1, and 78.3% of patients had ≥ 2° difference for AP angle 2.

Conclusion

The average absolute difference in alignment measured between standard AP radiograph and full-length weight-bearing radiograph views was significant, with 46.7% to 78.3% of patients having a greater than 2° absolute difference between these 2 views. In cases where precise objective alignment measurement is necessary, full-length weight-bearing radiographs are recommended over standard AP radiographs for presurgical planning so as to reduce potential error in over- or underestimation of the true mechanical alignment.

Study Design

Prospective case-comparison; Level of evidence, 1.