The all-inside meniscal repair technique has less risk of injury to the lateral geniculate artery than the inside-out repair technique when suturing the lateral meniscus

Evaluation of healing after arthroscopic repair of lateral meniscal tears around the popliteal hiatus

BACKGROUND

The popliteal hiatus stabilizes the lateral meniscus (LM). Variable failure rates for LM repairs have been reported in knees with lateral meniscal tears (LMTs), which may be attributable to low vascularity around the popliteal hiatus. An effective repair method is essential to enhance the biological healing and stability of LMTs around the popliteal hiatus.

HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopic repair of LMTs, including the popliteus tendon around the popliteal hiatus, is expected to produce a low reoperation rate and effective treatment, both clinically and radiographically.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From June 2011 to August 2020, 93 patients (mean age 27.9 ± 13.5 years) who underwent arthroscopic repair of LMTs including the popliteus tendon around the popliteal hiatus were enrolled. Patients with LMTs were divided into three groups: isolated LMTs, discoid LMTs, and LMTs with ACL injury. Patients had a minimum clinical follow-up of 2 years (mean 37.9 ± 19.3 months) and Tegner activity, Lysholm knee, and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were evaluated for all patients. The widths of the popliteal hiatus and LM extrusion were measured on the sagittal and coronal planes using preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

RESULTS

The Tegner activity (2.6 ± 1.2-4.5 ± 1.3), Lysholm (67.9 ± 14.2-88.1 ± 6.4), and HSS scores (79.8 ± 11.5-93.7 ± 5.1) were significantly improved in all knees (p < 0.001). The width of the popliteal hiatus measured on MRI was significantly decreased, when comparing the preoperative and postoperative MRI for all knees (sagittal plane, 2.9 ± 1.4-1.5 ± 0.5 mm; coronal plane, 3.8 ± 2.5 to 1.9 ± 1.0 mm) (p < 0.05). The LM extrusion measured on the sagittal plane of postoperative MRI was also significantly reduced after arthroscopic repair (24.8 ± 3.1-23.7 ± 2.8 mm) (p = 0.001). Five reoperations (5/93, 5.3%) were performed, suggesting a clinical failure.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic repair of isolated, discoid and post-traumatic LMTs including the popliteus tendon around the popliteal hiatus, is an effective surgical treatment for LM stabilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective series.

Incomplete meniscal healing in early second-look arthroscopy does not indicate failure of repair: a case series

PURPOSE

To assess if incomplete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy at six to eight weeks after all-inside suture hook meniscus repair results in longer-term failure of repair in patients with restored knee stability.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2013, 41 patients with post-traumatic, longitudinal, vertical, complete meniscal tears with concomitant ACL injury were treated via a two-stage surgical procedure and prospectively evaluated. In the first stage, all-inside meniscus repair was performed using suture hook passers and non-absorbable sutures. In total, there were 26 medial and 16 lateral meniscus tears. A second-stage ACL reconstruction, performed six to eight weeks later, served as an early second-look arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal healing. Clinical follow-up was performed at a minimum of 24 months.

RESULTS

Second-look arthroscopy revealed 31 cases (75.6%) of complete and ten cases (24.4%) of incomplete meniscal healing. Two patients were lost prior to follow-up, and three were excluded due to recurrent instability. Therefore, 36 patients were assessed at the final follow-up. All patients with complete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy achieved clinical success at follow-up. Six out of nine (66.7%) of patients with incomplete meniscal healing during second-look arthroscopy achieved clinical success at follow-up (p = 0.012). One saphenous neuropathy occurred (2.4%).

CONCLUSION

Incomplete meniscal healing during early second-look arthroscopy after all-inside meniscal repair using suture hook passers and non-absorbable sutures did not necessarily result in longer-term failure in patients with restored knee stability. The described method of meniscal repair was associated with a low rate of symptomatic re-tears and complications.

Arthroscopic Meniscus Repair Using an All-Inside, All-Suture, Knotless Device

With an increased appreciation of the importance an intact meniscus has on normal knee kinematics and function, more meniscal tears are being treated with a repair rather than partial meniscectomy. There are several techniques for repairing torn meniscal tissue, including the outside-in, inside-out, and all-inside repairs. Each technique comes with its advantages and drawbacks. The inside-out and outside-in techniques allow for greater control of the repair using knots outside the joint capsule; however, they pose a risk for neurovascular injury and require additional incisions. Arthroscopic all-inside repairs have seen increasing popularity, but with current techniques, fixation is achieved either with intra-articular knots or extra-articular implants, leading to variable outcomes and the potential for postoperative complications. This technical note describes the use of SuperBall, an all-inside meniscus repair device that provides an all-arthroscopic approach, no intraarticular knots or implants, and surgeon-guided tensioning of the meniscus repair.

All-Inside Meniscus Repair

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The indications for partial meniscectomy are becoming increasingly limited, and recent evidence suggests that the meniscus should be preserved whenever possible. Because of its many proposed advantages, all-inside meniscus repairs are becoming increasingly common. This review discusses the indications, advantages, disadvantages, and biomechanical and clinical outcomes of all-inside meniscus repair.

RECENT FINDINGS

All-inside meniscus repair demonstrates equal functional outcomes, healing rates, and complications compared to inside-out repair of vertical longitudinal and bucket-handle tears with the advantages of decreased surgical time and faster post-operative recovery. In addition, return-to-sport and activity levels are high following all-inside repair regardless of whether concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is performed. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated advantages of all-inside meniscal based repairs on radial and horizontal tears. All-inside meniscus repair compares favorably to inside-out repair of vertical longitudinal and bucket-handle tears and continues to increase in popularity. Both capsular based and meniscal based repairs can be used to repair a variety of tear patterns. While biomechanical results are encouraging, further research on the clinical outcomes of meniscal based repairs is needed to elucidate the role of these techniques in the future.

Tears of the Popliteomeniscal Fascicles of the Lateral Meniscus: An Arthroscopic Classification

OBJECTIVE

To bring forward an arthroscopic classification of the popliteomeniscal fascicles of the lateral meniscus (PFLM) tears.

DESIGN

Six fresh frozen knee joint samples of adult males were chosen, and the lateral meniscus at the popliteal hiatus region were measured to analyze their anatomic relationship. Patients who had received magnetic resonance imaging scan at knee joint before the surgery and diagnosed as PFLM tears by arthroscopy from April 2014 to October 2017 were selected. Data regarding the integrity of PFLM were prospectively recorded in a data registry. Tear morphology and treatment received were subsequently extracted by 2 independent reviewers from operative notes and arthroscopic surgical photos.

RESULTS

The average length and thickness of the popliteal hiatus of the lateral meniscus were 2.09 ± 0.21 cm and 0.43 ± 0.08 cm, respectively. The average length of anterosuperior popliteomeniscal fascicle (APF) was 0.87 ± 0.18 cm, and the posterosuperior popliteomeniscal fascicle (PPF) was 0.72 ± 0.15 cm. A total of 36 PFLM tears in 36 patients were divided as type I (APF tear; n = 5, 13.9%), type II (PPF tear; n = 20, 55.6%), and type III (both APF and PPF tears; n = 11, 30.6%). All patients were treated with arthroscopic all-inside repair using a suture hook for the PFLM tears and follow-up for 21.1 months. All patients have done well with significantly improved Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores at the last follow-up relative to preoperative scores (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests to possibly classify the PFLM tears for clinical practice.

Assessment of popliteal neurovascular safety during all-inside suturing of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus using Upright MRIs of the knee joint

BACKGROUND

To examine the risk of injury to the popliteal neurovascular bundle (pNVB) during all-inside repair of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (PHLM) using Upright-MRIs.

METHODS

Upright-MRIs of 61 knees in extension (ext) and 90°-flexion (flex) were included. Distance D from the PHLM to the pNVB was compared between extended and 90°-flexed position, subgroups with/without joint-effusion and evaluated according to demographics. Portal safety was assessed simulating suturing of the PHLM via four arthroscopy portals. Distance d (shortest space from the simulated suturing-device trajectory lines to the pNVB) was compared among portals in increasing distances from the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

RESULTS

D is longer in flex (17.3 ± 6.0 mm) than in ext (11.3 ± 4.2 mm, p < 0.0001). MRIs with joint-effusion displayed longer values of D than scans without joint-effusion (flex: 20.4 ± 7.1 mm vs. 16.1 ± 5.2 mm, p = 0.012). Shorter distances are associated with female gender, lower body weight and lower BMI. At 0 mm from the PCL, the 1 cm-lateral portal was the safest (p < 0.0001) whereas at 3 mm/6mm/9mm/12 mm the 1 cm-medial portal showed the longest d values (p < 0.0001 each).

CONCLUSION

All-inside suturing of the PHLM is safer in 90°-flexion, in presence of intraarticular fluid and in male patients with increasing weight/BMI. Sutures of the PHLM at 0 mm from the PCL are safer from a 1 cm-lateral portal whereas for tears located ≥ 3 mm from the PCL a 1 cm-medial portal involves a lower neurovascular risk. Upright-MRI proves excellent for preoperative planning to minimize neurovascular risks.

Repair of popliteomeniscal fascicles tear using a posterior transseptal portal fixes hypermobile lateral meniscus

PURPOSE

This study investigates the effects of the all-inside repair of posterosuperior popliteomeniscal fascicle (PMF) on lateral meniscus stabilization using a posterior arthroscopic approach.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, 17 patients with hypermobile lateral meniscus (HLM) underwent posterior knee arthroscopy for PMF repair. The all-inside repair was performed through posteromedial transseptal and posterolateral portals using a suture hook technique. Patients were clinically assessed based on IKDC and Lysholm scores.

RESULTS

Both IKDC and Lysholm scores improved significantly after an average follow-up of 3.5 years (P < 0.001). No patients underwent reoperation, and no complications associated with posterior knee arthroscopy were reported.

CONCLUSION

The all-inside suture hook technique using posterolateral and posteromedial transseptal portals fixes HLM with excellent IKDC and Lysholm scores.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Posterolateral approach for all-inside arthroscopic lateral meniscus repair in athletes: technique and outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The past 2 decades have been marked by substantial progress in our knowledge of meniscus anatomy, function, and biomechanics, and also by the shifting of the surgical treatment of meniscal lesions from traditional meniscectomy towards arthroscopic repair to get away from the early osteoarthritis associated with meniscectomy. Posterior horn injuries of the lateral meniscus (LM) have been less studied due to their lower incidence and also due to the historical technical complexity of performing a repair in the posterolateral compartment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed of all athletic patients who had a peripheral longitudinal tear of the lateral meniscal posterior horn and who underwent at least one repair procedure with a posterolateral approach between 2014 and 2018. The type of injury, extent of lateral meniscal tear, and characteristics of sutures placed were assessed. Clinical assessment included objective and subjective IKDC ratings. The Tegner activity level score was determined before the injury and at the last follow-up visit. Failure was defined as a need for revision surgery. All complications were documented.

RESULTS

The study population comprised 24 athletes with a mean follow-up of 25.2 ± 10 months. The Tegner activity level was exactly the same before the injury as after the surgery. The mean IKDC score significantly increased from 41.8 (12.2) before the surgery to 94.5 (9.1) after. There were four reoperations for failure (16.6%) that required a new suture repair. None of these revised repairs sustained a new failure as of the last follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Despite the long learning curve, the posterolateral approach is a safe and effective technique for longitudinal tears of the posterior horn of the LM. The results of all-inside suture repair through a posterolateral portal are comparable to other techniques.

Widening of the popliteal hiatus on magnetic resonance imaging leads to recurrent subluxation of the lateral meniscus

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to elucidate the clinical significance of widening of the popliteal hiatus on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to document the clinical results and technical aspects of arthroscopic repair of this finding.

METHODS

Included are 82 knees after arthroscopic surgery, divided according to arthroscopic diagnosis into group A, hypermobility of lateral meniscus, 8 knees; group B, tear of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, 32 knees; and group C, no abnormality of the lateral meniscus, 36 knees with medial meniscal tears and 6 with other conditions. Popliteal hiatus diameter was measured and the popliteal hiatus/lateral tibial plateau (LTP) ratio was calculated on preoperative sagittal and coronal MRI. At arthroscopy, the widened popliteal hiatus in group A was tightened anteriorly by outside-in or all-inside suture and posteriorly with all-inside suture. Outcomes were evaluated with MRI, Lysholm, Tegner and VAS scores.

RESULTS

The preoperative diameter of the popliteal hiatus and the popliteal hiatus/LTP ratio were significantly larger in group A than in groups B and C (p < 0.05) on both views. Threshold popliteal hiatus/LTP values of 0.16 and 0.18 on the sagittal and coronal views demonstrated diagnostic discrimination, and these values were significantly reduced after arthroscopy in Group A. Lysholm and Tegner scores were improved after tightening of the popliteal hiatus, while VAS scores reduced (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Widening of the popliteal hiatus on MRI may lead to recurrent subluxation of the lateral meniscus. Arthroscopic anterior and posterior tightening of the popliteal hiatus was a safe and effective treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

You Can Repair More Tears Than You Think-Tricks for All-Inside Lateral Meniscal Repair With Nonabsorbable Sutures

Since the role of the menisci has been better understood, there is a trend toward the meniscal repair rather than meniscectomy in the management of meniscal tears. Although numerous techniques of meniscal repair have been described and many authors advocate for and against each of them, no single method is universally accepted. The all-inside repair provides several advantages, such as a lower risk of neurovascular injury, the early introduction of exercises in passive range of motion, or the high strength of the repair. However, the all-inside meniscal repair with nonabsorbable suture is considered to be a technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve needed to perform it properly. The purpose of this Technical Note is to present the technique of lateral meniscus repair with nonabsorbable sutures and to provide surgical pearls to facilitate this procedure.

Arthroscopic all-inside repair with suture hook for horizontal tear of the lateral meniscus at the popliteal hiatus region: a preliminary report

Background

Arthroscopic surgery procedures vary depending on the types of meniscus tear, including meniscectomy and meniscus repair. Among the several types of meniscus tear, the horizontal tear of the lateral meniscus at the popliteal hiatus region is a common injury, and its surgical treatment is still inconsistent.

Methods

Between January 2018 and October 2018, 20 patients who underwent all-inside repair with suture hook for the horizontal tear of the lateral meniscus at the popliteal hiatus region were recruited. Any operative complication was recorded, and postoperative MRI scans were conducted at the 6 months. The clinical results were graded based on the scale of the Lysholm knee score preoperatively and at follow-up.

Results

No operative complications were recorded. Postoperative MRIs at the 6 months showed that there was no re-tear for all patients, though signal intensity remained high in T2-weighted MRI in the lateral meniscus for nine cases. The average preoperative Lysholm knee score was 58.6 ± 10.1, which increased significantly to 89.3 ± 7.8 (t = − 11.01, p = 0.001) at the last follow-up. Recurrence or aggravation of symptoms was not noted at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

All-inside repair with suture hook may be a good option for the horizontal tear of the lateral meniscus at the popliteal hiatus region which preserves the meniscus; avoids iatrogenic injury on the adjacent popliteal tendon, common peroneal nerve, and inferior lateral geniculate artery.

Arthroscopic Repair of Double Radial Tears of the Lateral Meniscus

Double radial tears of the lateral meniscus are rare injuries that typically occur in the setting of an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Full-thickness radial tears of the meniscus body and root render the meniscus nonfunctional from a loss of hoop stress resistance. Repair of these tears can normalize contact pressures in the lateral compartment and delay arthritic changes. We describe our technique for repairing a lateral meniscus body radial tear and concomitant posterior root tear, via inside-out suture repair and transtibial suture repair, respectively. This investigation was performed at Mayo Clinic.

Editorial Commentary: The Benefits of Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Images to Evaluate the Safety of All-Inside Meniscal Repair

All-inside meniscal repair is a useful alternative to inside-out repair, particularly for the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, because open approach to the complex posterolateral corner can be avoided. However, risk to the neurovascular structures is a major concern, and surgeons must be aware of portal placement, degree of penetration, patient size, and patient positioning. Imaging studies may be misleading, as they are generally obtained with the knee in extension. In the future, advanced imaging by 3-dimensional computed tomography may better allow us to preoperatively plan for a safe approach to the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus using all-inside repair techniques.

Popliteal neurovascular bundle is safe during inside-out repair of medial meniscus without a safety incision

PURPOSE

There is a theoretical risk of injury to neurovascular structures during inside-out meniscal repair without a safety incision, although there are limited studies assessing this risk. This simulation study on archival MRI films was performed to assess the risk for the popliteal neurovascular bundle and the peroneal nerve during passage of needles for inside-out meniscus repair without a "safety incision", thereby defining a "safe zone" of the menisci that can be safely repaired using this technique.

METHODS

Archival MRI scans (n = 50) were retrieved and axial sections through the menisci were used for simulation. The needle passage was simulated for different points on the posterior horn and body of lateral and medial menisci at "half-hour" intervals using clock method (15° intervals) with three different portals and two different needle cannulas, resulting in six different scenarios of needle passage for each point on the meniscus. The distance of the needle in each scenario was measured from popliteal vessels (n = 50) and peroneal nerve (n = 10). The value "mean-3SD" was calculated for positive means and "Mean + 3SD" was calculated if the mean was negative. An additional 2 mm was defined as "safe distance". Thus, simulation models in which the mean - 3SD was less than 2 mm (or mean + 3SD was greater than - 2 mm for negative means) were labelled as "unsafe".

RESULTS

Needle passage through medial meniscus at and medial to 1 o'clock position for a right knee (or 11 o'clock position for a left knee) was safe, irrespective of the portal and needle type. For the lateral meniscus, only the equatorial region was found to be safe with this method.

CONCLUSIONS

The popliteal neurovascular bundle is safe during the inside-out medial meniscal repair without a safety incision. For the terminal-most part of the posterior horn, the AM portal and the straight cannula should be avoided. However, this method without safety incision cannot be recommended for lateral meniscus because of the risk to the popliteal vessels and the peroneal nerve. Instead, the inside-out method with a safety incision, or an all-inside method should be used for lateral meniscus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The popliteus tendon provides a safe and reliable location for all-inside meniscal repair device placement

PURPOSE

Repairs of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus can be technically challenging. In contrast to medial meniscus repairs, the capsule around the posterior segment attachment of the lateral meniscus is quite thin. This study evaluates the clinical results of an arthroscopic all-inside repair technique for unstable, vertical, lateral meniscus tears, using a suture repair placed directly into the popliteus tendon.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the SANTI database was performed. All patients who had undergone combined ACL reconstruction with lateral meniscus all-inside repair, using sutures placed in the popliteus tendon, between 2011 and 2015, were included. Patients were reviewed clinically at 1 and 2 years' follow-up. At final follow-up, all patients were contacted to identify if they underwent further surgery or had knee pain, locking or effusion. Symptomatic patients were recalled for clinical evaluation by a physician and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the knee. Operative notes for those undergoing further surgery were reviewed and rates and type of re-operation, including for failed lateral meniscal repair were recorded.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients (mean age 28.6 ± 10.2 years) with a mean follow-up of 45.5 ± 12.8 months (range 24.7-75.2) were included. The mean Subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) at final follow-up was 85.0 ± 11.3. The post-operative mean side-to-side laxity measured at 1 year was 0.6 ± 1.0 mm. Twenty-six patients underwent re-operation (13%) at a mean follow-up of 14.8 ± 7.8 months. The ACL graft rupture rate was 5.0%. Other causes for re-operation included medial meniscus tear (2.5%), cyclops lesion (1.5%) and septic arthritis (0.5%). The lateral meniscus repair failure rate was 3.5%. No specific complications relating to placement of sutures in the popliteus tendon were identified.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic all-inside repair of unstable, vertical, lateral meniscus tears using a suture placed in the popliteus tendon is a safe technique. It is associated with a very low failure rate with no specific complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.