Effective patellofemoral joint stabilization and low complication rates using a hardware-free MPFL reconstruction technique with an intra-operative adjustment of the graft tension

Early Postoperative Rapid Rehabilitation Yields More Favorable Short-term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Patellar Realignment Surgery for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Use of a rapid rehabilitation protocol for postoperative recovery after recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) has gradually gained attention; nonetheless, evidence of its safety and effectiveness is lacking.

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of early rapid rehabilitation with those of conservative rehabilitation in patients with RPD.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 50 patients with RPD who underwent tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction were enrolled between January 2018 and February 2019. Postoperatively, the patients were randomly assigned to either the early rapid group (rapid group; n = 25 patients) or the conservative group (control group; n = 25 patients) for rehabilitation training. The rapid group underwent faster progression in weightbearing and range of motion (ROM) training. Knee joint functional scores, ROM, bilateral thigh circumference differences, and imaging data were recorded preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively for comparison. Postoperative complications were recorded over the 24-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

The baseline data did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Postoperatively, compared with the control group, the rapid group had higher Tegner scores at 6 weeks and 3 months; higher Lysholm scores at 3 and 6 months; higher International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 12 months; better ROM; and smaller bilateral thigh circumference differences at 24 months (P < .05 for all). However, no differences were observed in the Tegner, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores at 24 months postoperatively. At the 6-week and subsequent follow-up visits, the Caton and Insall indices were lower in the control group than in the rapid group (P < .01 for all). Moreover, compared with the control group, the rapid group had a lower incidence of patella baja at 24 months (0% vs 17%) and fewer complications during the whole follow-up period (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Early rapid postoperative rehabilitation appears to be safe and effective for patients who undergo tibial tubercle osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction to treat RPD. In the short term, this approach was shown to be more advantageous than conservative rehabilitation in improving functional scores, allowing an earlier return to daily activities, although the lack of difference at 24 months implies no long-term benefits. In addition, it potentially helped to prevent the occurrence of complications, including patella baja.

REGISTRATION

ChiCTR1800014648 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Fear of Reinjury, Psychological Factors, and Sport Played Have Negative Impact on Return to Sport Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Patellar Instability

PURPOSE

To analyze factors that affect return to sport after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR), such as psychological factors, sport played, and a positive apprehension test following surgery, and to determine the average return to sport rates and time to return to sport.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Included studies met the following criteria: patients underwent MPFLR for patellar instability, return to sport was recorded, and a factor that affected return to sport was mentioned. Search terms included medial patellofemoral ligament, tibial tubercle osteotomy, tibial tubercle transfer, return to play, and return to sport.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 632 identified studies met inclusion criteria, and 1,072 patients who underwent MFPLR were recorded. Return-to-sport rates and mean/median time ranged from 60.0% to 100% and 3 to 10.4 months, respectively. Of the patients, 55.6% to 84.0% returned to sport without decreasing the level of competition. Six of 12 studies (50.0%) reported fear of reinjury as the top reason for patients not returning or returning at a lower level of sport. Volleyball/handball had the lowest return to the same level following surgery (18.2%-50.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Athletes who underwent MPFLR following recurrent patellar instability returned to sport at a range of 60.0% to 100%. Return to sport at the same level or higher was found to have a lower maximum rate at 55.6% to 84.0%. Fear of reinjury and sport played were found to have a substantial impact on ability to return to sport. Surgeons can use this information to advise patients on expectations following surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using patella bone tunnel techniques with or without implants. A systematic review of outcomes and complications

PURPOSE

Τhe main goal of this study was to compare the clinical results, including the complication rates and patient-reported outcomes, in patients who underwent surgery for recurrent patellar dislocation using different patellar tunnel fixation techniques. This study compared Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL) reconstruction implant free techniques against ones that used implants.

METHODS

The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in January 2023. We included patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Patients with confirmed concomitant or prior ipsilateral knee procedures, multiligament injury, severe patellar dysplasia or less than 6 months of follow-up were excluded. MINORS and MCMS scores were used for the assessment of methodological quality.

RESULTS

Data from 750 procedures were collected, of which 284 used implants to perform the procedure while in 455 an implant-free technique was used. Patient age at the time of surgery ranged from 11 to 60 years while the follow-up time of the studies ranged between 3 and 108 months. Postoperative Kujala (0.3, p = 0.89) and Lysholm (1.2, p = 0.26) scores were better in the implant-free techniques compared to implant-based. A higher rate of recurrent dislocation (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.10-2.54, p = 0.4), subluxation (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.40-0.88, p = 0.019) and stiffness (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.33-1.72, p = 0.55) was noted in the implant-free techniques, while the implant-based techniques displayed increased incidence of patella fractures (OR 3.12; 95% CI 0.77-12.6, p = 0.09), reoperation (OR 1.69; 95% CI 0.78-3.65, p = 0.17) and infection (OR 2.07; 95% CI 0.46-9.32, p = 0.33).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference between the 2 techniques in terms of patient reported outcomes. Regarding complications, MPFL reconstruction using implants demonstrated significant higher rate of patella fractures while the implant free technique showed a greater risk of subluxation.

Protocols of rehabilitation and return to sport, and clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

No consensus exists on rehabilitation programmes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with or without tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO). This systematic review examined the content and timeline of rehabilitation (weightbearing, range of motion [ROM] and exercise therapy) and return to sport (RTS), as well as patient-reported outcomes after MPFLR with or without TTO.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception to December 2021. Studies that reported postoperative rehabilitation programmes and patient-reported outcomes for patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent MPFLR with or without concomitant TTO were included.

RESULTS

Eighty-five studies were included, 57 of which were case series and only one randomised controlled trial on rehabilitation programmes. Non-weightbearing was set within one week post-operatively in approximately 80% of weightbearing programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO. Joint immobilisation was set within one week post-operatively in 65.3% and 93.8% of programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO, respectively. Weightbearing and ROM (≤ 90°) restriction were within three weeks post-operatively for > 50% of the programmes. Quadriceps strengthening was the most cited exercise therapy (33 programmes), most often initiated within two weeks post-operatively. However, few other exercise programmes were cited (only nine programmes). RTS was mostly noted at six months post-operatively (35 programmes). The weighted mean Kujala score was 87.4 points.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of TTO addition to MPFLR, most studies restricted weightbearing and ROM only in the early post-operative period, with seemingly favourable clinical results. Limited information was available on post-operative exercise therapy.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Adductor-Transfer and Adductor-Sling at Nonanatomic Femoral Attachment Sites Leads to Unfavorable Graft-Length Change Patterns: A Descriptive Biomechanical Study

PURPOSE

To compare the graft length change patterns in nonanatomic adductor-transfer (AT) and adductor-sling (AS) medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with those in anatomic MPFL reconstruction (MPFLR) and to investigate the favorable isometric ranges (FIRs) of knee flexion.

METHODS

Eight small fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were mounted in a knee-customized jig with tensioned muscles to measure graft length changes from two patellar points to four femoral attachments using a linear variable displacement transducer. Femoral attachments were at the MPFL footprint center (MPFL-C) in anatomic MPFLR, adductor magnus (AM) footprint center (AM-C) in AT, and at 5-mm (AM-5) or 10-mm (AM-10) points proximal to AM-C in AS. The FIRs of these femoral attachments were determined after zeroing the graft length changes at different initial fixation angles.

RESULTS

Anatomic MPFL-C resulted in almost isometric graft length changes from 0° to 90°. At AM-C, the graft length changes displayed an increase from 0° to 45° and significantly greater length changes than those at MPFL-C from 60° to 90°. The graft length changes at both AM-5 and at AM-10 continuously increased with knee flexion angles and presented significantly larger graft length changes than those at MPFL-C and at AM-C from 30° to 90° and 60° to 90°, respectively. After zeroing graft length changes at different fixation angles, the FIRs of the MPFL-C covered all knee flexion angles, regardless of the patellar attachments and initial fixation angles. Moreover, with the smaller FIRs of AM-C observed at any fixation angle when compared with MPFL-C, fixing the graft at 0° to 30° in AT allowed the FIRs to cover the whole functional flexion range. However, the significantly larger graft length changes of both AM-5 and AM-10 resulted in extremely limited FIRs at any fixation angle.

CONCLUSION

Anatomic MPFL-C resulted in a favorable graft length change range (less than 2 mm) at 0° to 90° of knee flexion, which was close to the isometric graft behavior. However, nonanatomic attachments of AM-C in AT, and both AM-5 and AM-10 in AS caused significant anisometric graft length change patterns and limited FIRs. Moreover, AT had a smaller range of graft length change but wider FIRs compared to AS, indicating superior graft behavior for MPFLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Anatomic MPFLR is preferable for the treatment of in skeletally immature patients, followed in preference by nonanatomic AT. Nonanatomic AS should be performed cautiously.

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective

PURPOSE

This systematic review evaluated the clinical outcomes of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction techniques in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), redislocation rate, and complications. The hypothesis was that hardware-free MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability is safe and effective.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Virtual Health Library databases were accessed in October 2021. All the clinical studies investigating the efficacy and feasibility of hardware-free MPFL reconstruction were screened for inclusion. Only studies with a minimum 24-month follow-up were considered eligible. Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale improvement and redislocation rate after surgical treatment were evaluated as primary outcomes. The rate of postoperative complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome. The quality of the methodological assessment was assessed using the Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included in the present systematic review. The quality of the methodological assessment was moderate. Short- to long-term improvement of Kujala score was observed in all included studies. Mean score improvement ranged from + 13.2/100 to + 54/100, with mean postoperative scores ranging from 82/100 to 94/100. Patellar redislocation was observed in 8.33% (8 of 96) patients.

CONCLUSION

Hardware-free MPFL reconstruction with or without associated soft-tissue or bony realignment procedures provided reliable clinical improvements and was associated with a low rate of redislocation in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Advantages such as safety, femoral physis preservation, and comparable complication profiles with implant-based techniques endorse its implementation. Orthopedic surgeons in cost-sensitive environments may also benefit their patients with lower costs, no need for implants, lack of implant-related complications, or surgery for implant removal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Return to Sport After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patellar instability is frequently encountered in the athletic population. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a common strategy to treat recurrent patellar dislocation and demonstrates good clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to examine return to sport after MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability. We hypothesized that patients would resume athletic activity at a high rate and that a large proportion would return to their preoperative level of performance.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to identify articles reporting return to sport after MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Athletes were defined as those reporting a preoperative sport. A random-effects model was used to evaluate return to sport rates, subsequent level, and rate of instability recurrence. Meta-regression was used to compare return to sport rates in patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction without osteotomy compared with those treated with simultaneous tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty.

RESULTS

In total, 23 articles met inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 930 patients were analyzed, including 786 athletes. Women represented 61.3% of all patients. The overall mean age was 21.1 years (range, 9.5-60.0 years), with a mean follow-up time of 3.0 years (range, 0.8-8.5 years). The return to sport rate was 92.8% (95% CI, 86.4-97.6). Patients returned to or surpassed their preoperative level of activity in 71.3% (95% CI, 63.7-78.4) of cases. An osteotomy was performed on 10.5% of athletes. Return to sport did not differ significantly in patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction without osteotomy versus those receiving additional osteotomy (95.4% vs 86.9%; P = .22). Patients returned to sport at a mean of 6.7 months (range, 3.0-6.4 months) postoperatively. Osteotomy did not affect return time. Complications occurred at an overall rate of 8.8%. The most common complication was recurrence of instability (1.9%; 95% CI, 0.4-4.0). The Kujala score was reported by 13 studies, with pre- and postoperative combined means of 60.3 and 90.0, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MPFL reconstruction is an effective and reliable treatment in the setting of patellofemoral instability. Surgeons can counsel their patients that they can expect a high rate of return to sport after MPFL reconstruction surgery alone or with concomitant osteotomy.

CLINICAL RESULTS OF MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION

Objective

To assess clinical results of patients who underwent medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction after a minimum of two years of follow-up.

Methods

Patients' medical records were assessed for residual instability, patient satisfaction, and post-operative functional outcomes.

Results

Fifty-one patients were analyzed, out of which 56.87% were women. Patients' mean age was 30.8 years (16 to 57 years). The mean follow-up time was 68.7 months (37 to 120 months). Length between first dislocation and surgery was less than 1 year for 58.82% of patients, between 1 and 5 years for 37.25%, and over 5 years for 3.93%. Patients showed a high degree of satisfaction (96.08% would undergo surgery again), with recurrence rate of 11.76%. Twenty-two patients reported knee symptoms, including pain from movements (72.72%), weakness (18.18%), constant pain (13.63%), and crepitus (4.54%). Considering dissatisfied patients, patients with dislocation recurrence, and patients with symptoms, five cannot practice physical activity, out of which only three blame their knee.

Conclusion

MPFL reconstruction showed a recurrence rate of 11.7%, with high patient satisfaction, good functional results, and high rate of return to sports, after a minimum of two years of follow-up. Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Single-Incision, Single Patellar Tunnel For Double-Bundle Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Technical Note

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the main medial stabilizer of the patella, while reconstruction of the ligament is a common surgery performed by orthopedic surgeons. Although several surgical methods have been described regarding MPFL reconstruction, the common goals of these surgeries are to imitate the anatomic features of the native MPFL. In the single-incision and single patellar tunnel and double-bundle MPFL reconstruction technique, we will present the anatomical footprint of the MPFL located in the medial aspect of the patella, which is filled with the graft. In this technique, graft fixation is performed in the femoral tunnel using only one bioabsorbable screw without the need for fixation in the patella.

Anatomical Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patella Dislocation: Two-Strand Grafts versus Four-Strand Grafts

The purpose of this study was to describe two anatomical medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction methods: reconstruction with two-strand grafts and reconstruction with four-strand grafts and to evaluate the clinical and radiological results. From January 2010 to January 2013, patients who sustained recurrent patella dislocation and met inclusion criteria were included in the study and divided into two groups randomly to undergo MPFL reconstruction either by two-strand grafts (T group) or four-strand grafts (F group). Patients were followed up 1 month, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years postoperatively. The apprehension test was applied to test patella stability. The Kujala score, Lysholm score, and Crosby-Insall grading were used to evaluate the function of the affected knee. The patellar congruence and patellar tilt angle were used to measure the morphology of the patellofemoral joint. In addition, patients' subjective assessments and complications were recorded. Thirty-eight patients in T group and 38 patients in F group were followed for at least 36 months. The apprehension test was positive in all patients preoperatively but was negative at follow-up. The Kujala score, Lysholm score, patellar congruence angle, and the patellar tilt angle of patients in both groups improved significantly at 36-month follow-up when compared with those assessed preoperatively. However, patients in the F group achieved better clinical results in terms of Kujala score, patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, and Crosby-Insall grading when compared with those in the T group 3 years after the operation. Most patients (92% of patients in the T group and 97% of patients in the F group) were satisfied with the surgery. The anatomical MPFL reconstruction with two-strand grafts or four-strand grafts were both safe techniques for recurrent patella dislocation with satisfactory clinical outcomes. The anatomical fixation with four-strand grafts achieved better clinical and radiographic results in the follow-up, which may be a better reconstruction method.

Systematic Review of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Techniques: Comparison of Patellar Bone Socket and Cortical Surface Fixation Techniques

PURPOSE

To compare patellar bone socket and cortical surface fixation techniques for isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction and determine whether there was a difference in (1) complication rates, including fracture of the patella; (2) redislocation rates; or (3) patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We included patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Patients with confirmed concomitant or prior ipsilateral knee procedures, multiligament injury, or less than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) system. Studies were classified by surgical technique (patellar bone socket group [group S] vs cortical fixation group [group F]), and complications, redislocations, and patient-reported outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies yielded 981 patients with MPFL reconstruction for inclusion. Of the patients, 620 underwent a patellar bone socket technique and 361 underwent a cortical fixation technique. Patients ranged in age from 11 to 68 years. Patellar fracture rates ranged from 0% to 17% in group S and were 0% in all group F studies. Mean Kujala scores ranged from 83.5 to 93.6 in group S and from 84.4 to 94.5 in group F. Mean Lysholm scores ranged from 84.6 to 91.7 in group S and from 83.5 to 95 in group F. Redislocation rates ranged from 0% to 21% in group S and from 0% to 13% in group F. Although heterogeneous in nature, complication rates ranged from 0% to 28% in group S and from 0% to 4% in group F.

CONCLUSIONS

MPFL reconstruction techniques with patellar bone sockets showed a larger range of complication rates than cortical fixation techniques, although overall, complications remained uncommon. Clinically, the bone socket group had comparable postoperative redislocation rates and patient outcomes to the group treated with cortical fixation techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I through IV studies.