Internal-external malalignment of the femoral component in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty increases tibial force imbalance but does not change laxities of the tibiofemoral joint

Anatomical Reference of the Femur after Distal Resection Is Reliable for Rotational Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty

The rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered an important factor, but it is still difficult to assess intraoperatively. This study was conducted to identify anatomical parameters for femoral rotational alignment. A total of 204 patients who underwent primary TKA between 2015 and 2019 were enrolled. The femoral lateral (FLAP) and femoral medial anteroposterior (FMAP) lengths were measured as the widest lengths in the anteroposterior (AP) axis after distal femoral resection. The difference between FLAP and FMAP was defined as dFAP. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was assessed for agreement between the cTEA-PCA and the value of femoral rotation using the linear regression analysis equation. HKA, FLAP, FMAP, and dFAP were significantly associated with femoral rotational alignment. The prediction equation combining the novel intraoperative anatomical references showed improved association with rotational alignment. If dFAP was 6.0 mm, the femoral rotation angle was calculated as 4.9° using this univariate regression equation. The CCC was 0.483, indicating moderate agreement. The dFAP showed an association with distal femoral rotational alignment. A 6 mm dFAP could be a reference for around 5° of femoral rotation. The equation developed in this study may be a reliable tool for intraoperative distal femoral rotational alignment.

The language of knee alignment : updated definitions and considerations for reporting outcomes in total knee arthroplasty

Orthopaedic surgeons are currently faced with an overwhelming number of choices surrounding total knee arthroplasty (TKA), not only with the latest technologies and prostheses, but also fundamental decisions on alignment philosophies. From 'mechanical' to 'adjusted mechanical' to 'restricted kinematic' to 'unrestricted kinematic' - and how constitutional alignment relates to these - there is potential for ambiguity when thinking about and discussing such concepts. This annotation summarizes the various alignment strategies currently employed in TKA. It provides a clear framework and consistent language that will assist surgeons to compare confidently and contrast the concepts, while also discussing the latest opinions about alignment in TKA. Finally, it provides suggestions for applying consistent nomenclature to future research, especially as we explore the implications of 3D alignment patterns on patient outcomes.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(2):102-108.

Six Commonly Used Postoperative Radiographic Alignment Parameters Do Not Predict Clinical Outcome Scores after Unrestricted Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned TKA

Background: Unrestricted caliper-verified kinematically aligned (KA) TKA restores patient’s prearthritic coronal and sagittal alignments, which have a wide range containing outliers that concern the surgeon practicing mechanical alignment (MA). Therefore, knowing which radiographic parameters are associated with dissatisfaction could help a surgeon decide whether to rely on them as criteria for revising an unhappy patient with a primary KA TKA using MA principles. Hence, we determined whether the femoral mechanical angle (FMA), hip–knee–ankle angle (HKAA), tibial mechanical angle (TMA), tibial slope angle (TSA), and the indicators of patellofemoral tracking, including patella tilt angle (PTA) and the lateral undercoverage of the trochlear resection (LUCTR), are associated with clinical outcome scores. Methods: Forty-three patients with a CT scan and skyline radiograph after a KA TKA with PCL retention and medial stabilized design were analyzed. Linear regression determined the strength of the association between the FMA, HKA angle, PTS, PTA, and LUCTR and the forgotten joint score (FJS), Oxford knee score (OKS), and KOOS Jr score obtained at a mean of 23 months. Results: There was no correlation between the FMA (range 2° varus to −10° valgus), HKAA (range 10° varus to −9° valgus), TMA (range 10° varus to −0° valgus), TSA (range 14° posterior to −4° anterior), PTA (range, −10° medial to 14° lateral), and the LUCTR resection (range 2 to 9 mm) and the FJS (median 83), the OKS (median 44), and the KOOS Jr (median 85) (r = 0.000 to 0.079). Conclusions: Surgeons should be cautious about using postoperative FMA, HKAA, TMA, TSA, PTA, and LUCTR values within the present study’s reported ranges to explain success and dissatisfaction after KA TKA.

A Surgeon That Switched to Unrestricted Kinematic Alignment with Manual Instruments Has a Short Learning Curve and Comparable Resection Accuracy and Outcomes to Those of an Experienced Surgeon

After starting an orthopedic practice, a surgeon with a fellowship in mechanically aligned (MA) TKA initiated this study to characterize their learning curve after they switched to unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA) TKA using manual instruments. Accordingly, the present study determined for the inexperienced (IE) surgeon the number of cases required to achieve consistent femoral resections and operating times, and whether the femoral resection accuracy, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and component alignment were different from an experienced (E) surgeon. This prospective cohort study analyzed the IE surgeon’s first 30 TKAs, all performed with KA, and 30 consecutive KA TKAs performed by an E surgeon. The resection accuracy or deviation was the calipered thickness of the distal and posterior medial and lateral femoral resections minus the planned resection thickness, which was the thickness of the corresponding condyle of the femoral component, minus 2 mm for cartilage wear, and 1 mm for the kerf of the blade. Independent observers recorded the femoral resection thickness, operative times, PROMs, and alignment. For each femoral resection, the deviation between three groups of patients containing ten consecutive KA TKAs, was either insignificant (p = 0.695 to 1.000) or within the 0.5 mm resolution of the caliper, which indicated no learning curve. More than three groups were needed to determine the learning curve for the operative time; however, the IE surgeon’s procedure dropped to 77 min for the last 10 patients, which was 20 min longer than the E surgeon. The resection deviations of the IE and E surgeon were comparable, except for the posterolateral femoral resection, which the IE surgeon under-resected by a mean of −0.8 mm (p < 0.0001). At a mean follow-up of 9 and 17 months, the Forgotten Joint Score, Oxford Knee Score, KOOS, and the alignment of the components and limbs were not different between the IE and E surgeon (p ≥ 0.6994). A surgeon that switches to unrestricted KA with manual instruments can determine their learning curve by computing the deviation of the distal and posterior femoral resections from the planned resection. Based on the present study, an IE surgeon could have resection accuracy, post-operative patient outcomes, and component alignment comparable to an E surgeon.

Excellent and Good Results Treating Stiffness with Early and Late Manipulation after Unrestricted Caliper-Verified Kinematically Aligned TKA

Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) for stiffness within 6 to 12 weeks after mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) generally yields better outcome scores than an MUA performed later. However, the timing of MUA after unrestricted, caliper-verified, kinematically aligned (KA) TKA remains uncertain. A retrospective review identified 82 of 3558 (2.3%) KA TKA patients treated with an MUA between 2010 and 2017. Thirty patients treated with an MUA within 3 months of the TKA (i.e., early) and 24 in the late group (i.e., >3 months) returned a questionnaire after a mean of 6 years and 5 years, respectively. Mean outcome scores for the early vs. late group were 78 vs. 62 for the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (p = 0.023) and 42 vs. 39 for the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (p = 0.037). Subjectively, the early vs. late group responses indicated that 83% vs. 67% walked without a limp, 73% vs. 54% had normal extension, and 43% vs. 25% had normal flexion. An MUA within 3 months after unrestricted KA TKA provided excellent FJS and OKS at final follow-up relative to a late MUA. A late MUA performed after 3 months is worth consideration because of the good FJS and OKS scores, albeit with a risk of a persistent limp and limitation in knee extension and flexion.

Negligible effect of surgeon experience on the accuracy and time to perform unrestricted caliper verified kinematically aligned TKA with manual instruments

PURPOSE

Surgeons performing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are interested in the accuracy and time it takes to make the four femoral resections that determine the setting of the femoral component. A method for quantifying the error of each resection is the thickness, measured by a caliper, minus the femoral target. The present study tested the hypothesis that the mean deviation of the resection from the femoral target, the percentage of resections with a deviation of ± 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm, and the time to complete the femoral cuts were not different between experienced (E) and less-experienced (LE) surgeons performing unrestricted caliper verified kinematically aligned (KA) TKA with manual instruments.

METHODS

This study analyzed intraoperative verification worksheets from 203 patients treated by ten E surgeons and 58 patients treated by four LE surgeons. The worksheet recorded (1) the thickness of the femoral target for the distal medial (DM), distal lateral (DL), posterior medial (PM), and posterior lateral (PL) resections and the caliper thickness of the resections with a resolution of 0.5 mm, and (2) the time to complete them. The most accurate resection has a mean difference ± standard deviation of 0 ± 0.0 mm.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the 1044 initial resections (261 patients) was significantly closer to the femoral target for E vs. the LE surgeons: 0.0 ± 0.4 vs. - 0.3 ± 0.5 for the DM, 0.0 ± 0.5 vs. - 0.4 ± 0.6 for the DL, - 0.1 ± 0.5 vs. - 0.2 ± 0.5 PM, and - 0.1 ± 0.5 vs. - 0.4 ± 0.6 for the PL resections (p ≤ 0.0248). E surgeons completed the femoral resections in 12 min; 5 min faster than LE surgeons (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the mean difference in femoral resections with manual instruments for E vs. LE surgeons was < 0.5 mm which is within the caliper's resolution, differences in accuracy were not clinically relevant. Surgeons exploring other alignment options and robotic, navigation, and patient-specific instrumentation might find these values helpful when deciding to change.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

Adjusting Insert Thickness and Tibial Slope Do Not Correct Internal Tibial Rotation Loss Caused by PCL Resection: In Vitro Study of a Medial Constraint TKA Implanted with Unrestricted Calipered Kinematic Alignment

Most medial stabilized (MS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants recommend excision of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), which eliminates the ligament's tension effect on the tibia that drives tibial rotation and compromises passive internal tibial rotation in flexion. Whether increasing the insert thickness and reducing the posterior tibial slope corrects the loss of rotation without extension loss and undesirable anterior lift-off of the insert is unknown. In 10 fresh-frozen cadaveric knees, an MS design with a medial ball-in-socket (i.e., spherical joint) and lateral flat insert was implanted with unrestricted calipered kinematic alignment (KA) and PCL retention. Trial inserts with goniometric markings measured the internal-external orientation relative to the femoral component's medial condyle at maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion. After PCL excision, these measurements were repeated with the same insert, a 1 mm thicker insert, and a 2- and 4-mm shim under the posterior tibial baseplate to reduce the tibial slope. Internal tibial rotation from maximum extension and 90 degrees of flexion was 15 degrees with PCL retention and 7 degrees with PCL excision (p < 0.000). With a 1 mm thicker insert, internal rotation was 8 degrees (p < 0.000), and four TKAs lost extension. With a 2 mm shim, internal rotation was 9 degrees (p = 0.001) and two TKAs lost extension. With a 4 mm shim, internal rotation was 10 degrees (p = 0.002) and five TKAs lost extension and three had anterior lift-off. The methods of inserting a 1 mm thicker insert and reducing the posterior slope did not correct the loss of internal tibial rotation after PCL excision and caused extension loss and anterior lift-off in several knees. PCL retention should be considered when using unrestricted calipered KA and implanting a medial ball-in-socket and lateral flat insert TKA design, so the progression of internal tibial rotation and coupled reduction in Q-angle throughout flexion matches the native knee, optimizing the retinacular ligaments' tension and patellofemoral tracking.

Hinge fracture in lateral closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy in knees undergoing double-level osteotomy: assessment of postoperative change in rotational alignment using CT evaluation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the radiological features of hinge fracture occurring at the distal medial femoral cortex in knees undergoing biplanar lateral closed-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (LCW-DFO) in double-level osteotomy (DLO) based on pre- and postoperative CT image analyses. It was hypothesised that medial hinge fractures in LCW-DFO would occur with a similar incidence to that in high tibial osteotomy, and its occurrence would affect the clinical/radiological outcomes and induce unintended change in alignment depending on the fracture type (direction of the fracture).

METHODS

A consecutive series of 36 knees (31 patients) with primary varus osteoarthritis undergoing DLO comprised the study population. The mean age at surgery was 62.0 ± 5.9 years. Presence of hinge fracture was assessed on radiographs and CT images at 1 week. The fracture type was classified depending on the direction of the fracture line: crack propagation in line with the osteotomy (type 1) and fractures extending proximally (type 2) or distally (type 3) from the tip of the wedge. Computer-assisted assessments of bony limb alignment and bony geometry were conducted on a full-length weight-bearing radiograph and CT images using image analysis software. In addition, subjective clinical results were evaluated using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Radiological and clinical follow-up results at 1 and 2 years were compared to the preoperative data, while comparative analysis was made between the subjects with and without a hinge fracture.

RESULTS

Postoperative image examinations revealed type 1 and 2 medial femoral hinge fractures in 4 and 7 knees, while no type 3 fracture was identified in the study population. Consequently, the overall incidence of the hinge fracture was 30.6% (11 of the 36 knees). Four of those 11 fractures (36.4%) could not be detected on plain radiographs. CT image analysis for three-dimensional bony geometry showed greater increase in internal rotation of the distal bony segment (increased femoral antetorsion by 9.5° on average) after surgery compared to the knees without a hinge fracture (P = 0.01). Clinical evaluation using the KOOS at 2 years showed no significant difference between the groups with and without hinge fractures.

CONCLUSION

In LCW-DFO, medial femoral hinge fractures occurred in 30.6% of the cases. Knees with type 1 hinge fracture exhibited significantly greater increase in femoral antetorsion as compared to those without hinge fracture. In this case series, postoperative weight-bearing protocol was delayed for knees with hinge fracture. Consequently, surgical results were not affected by the occurrence of hinge fracture for up to 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (case series).

Restoring the Patient's Pre-Arthritic Posterior Slope Is the Correct Target for Maximizing Internal Tibial Rotation When Implanting a PCL Retaining TKA with Calipered Kinematic Alignment

INTRODUCTION

The calipered kinematically-aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) strives to restore the patient's individual pre-arthritic (i.e., native) posterior tibial slope when retaining the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL). Deviations from the patient's individual pre-arthritic posterior slope tighten and slacken the PCL in flexion that drives tibial rotation, and such a change might compromise passive internal tibial rotation and coupled patellofemoral kinematics.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were treated with a calipered KA TKA and a PCL retaining implant with a medial ball-in-socket and a lateral flat articular insert conformity that mimics the native (i.e., healthy) knee. The slope of the tibial resection was set parallel to the medial joint line by adjusting the plane of an angel wing inserted in the tibial guide. Three trial inserts that matched and deviated 2°> and 2°< from the patient's pre-arthritic slope were 3D printed with goniometric markings. The goniometer measured the orientation of the tibia (i.e., trial insert) relative to the femoral component.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the radiographic preoperative and postoperative tibial slope (0.7 ± 3.2°, NS). From extension to 90° flexion, the mean passive internal tibial rotation with the pre-arthritic slope insert of 19° was greater than the 15° for the 2°> slope (p < 0.000), and 15° for the 2°< slope (p < 0.000).

DISCUSSION

When performing a calipered KA TKA with PCL retention, the correct target for setting the tibial component is the patient's individual pre-arthritic slope within a tolerance of ±2°, as this target resulted in a 15-19° range of internal tibial rotation that is comparable to the 15-18° range reported for the native knee from extension to 90° flexion.

Tibial forces are more useful than varus-valgus laxities for identifying and correcting overstuffing in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty

Identifying and correcting varus-valgus (V-V) malalignment of the tibial component is important when balancing a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Accordingly, the primary objective was to determine whether the tibial forces or V-V laxities are more sensitive to, and thus more useful for identifying and correcting, V-V malalignments of the tibial component that overstuff a compartment. Calipered kinematically aligned TKA was performed on nine human cadaveric knees. Medial and lateral tibial forces and V-V laxities were measured from 0° to 120° flexion with an unmodified reference tibial component and modified tibial components that introduced ±1° and ±2° V-V malalignments from the reference component to overstuff either the medial or lateral compartment. Changes in the tibial forces were most sensitive to V-V malalignments at 0° flexion (medial = 118 ± 34 N/deg valgus malalignment and lateral = 79 ± 20 N/deg varus malalignment). The varus and valgus laxities were most sensitive to V-V malalignments at 30° flexion (-0.6 ± 0.1 deg/deg varus malalignment) and 120° flexion (-0.4 ± 0.2 deg/deg valgus malalignment), respectively. The maximum average signal-to-noise ratios of the sensitivities in tibial forces and V-V laxities (ie, signals) to reported measurement errors using current intraoperative technologies (14 N and 0.7°) (ie, noise) were 8.4 deg^-1 and 0.9 deg^-1 , respectively. Because of the greater signal-to-noise ratios, measuring tibial forces is more useful than measuring V-V laxities for identifying and correcting V-V malalignments of the tibial component that overstuff a compartment. Clinical Significance: The sensitivities of tibial forces provide objective guidance to surgeons performing V-V recuts of the tibia.

Deviations in femoral joint lines using calipered kinematically aligned TKA from virtually planned joint lines are small and do not affect clinical outcomes

PURPOSE

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) strives to restore the native distal and posterior joint lines of the femur. Because the joint lines of a virtually planned femoral component on the native femur can serve as surrogates of those of the native femur, the present study determined position and orientation deviations of the femoral joint lines following calipered KA TKA from virtually planned joint lines and whether these alignment deviations affect clinical outcomes. Our hypotheses were that the alignment deviations for most knees would be less than 2 mm and/or 2° and that larger alignment deviations would not be associated with lower clinical outcome scores.

METHODS

A review of lower extremity CT scanograms and CT scans of the knee identified 36 patients treated with calipered KA TKA in one limb and no other skeletal deformities in either limb. 3D models of the operated femur with the implanted femoral component and the native femur were created. The articular surfaces of a 3D model of the implanted femoral component in the TKA knee were shape-matched to the condyles of the native femur to create a virtual plan. The shape-matched femoral component served as a reference from which to determine alignment deviations of the femoral component implanted in the ipsilateral femur. The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were obtained at an average of 20 months.

RESULTS

For proximal-distal and anterior-posterior positions and varus-valgus and internal-external orientations of the femoral component, the root mean square deviations from the planned joint lines ranged from 1.4 to 1.5 (mm or degrees). The mean differences ranged from - 0.1 to 0.2 (mm or degrees) indicating an absence of systematic alignment deviations. The proportion of knees with joint lines within ± 2 mm and ± 2° of the joint lines of virtually planned knees ranged from 83 to 92%. For the FJS and OKS, the median values were 79 (out of 100) and 45 (out of 48), respectively, and there were no significant correlations between deviations in the positions and orientations and either the FJS or the OKS.

CONCLUSION

Alignment deviations were bounded by 2 mm and 2° for most knees, which previous biomechanical studies have shown reduce the risks of stiffness, loss of extension, loss of flexion, and tibial compartment forces higher than those of the native knee. Moreover, because median FJS and OKS were relatively high, and because larger alignment deviations did not correlate with lower outcome scores, deviations did not affect clinical outcomes. These results validate calipered KA TKA as a surgical technique which closely restores the distal and posterior femoral joint lines to those planned and achieves concomitant high patient-reported outcome scores. Thus, surgeons can use the calipered KA TKA technique with confidence that the surgical alignment goal will be satisfied with sufficient accuracy that high patient-reported outcomes are achieved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Articular Geometry Reconstruction for Knee Joint with a Wearable Compliant Device

Nonlinear articular geometries of biological joints have contributed to highly agile and adaptable human-body motions. However, human–machine interaction could potentially distort natural human motions if the artificial mechanisms overload the articular surfaces and constrain biological joint kinematics. It is desired to better understand the deformable articular geometries of biological joints in vivo during movements for design and control of wearable robotics. An articular geometry reconstruction method is proposed to measure the effective articular profile with a wearable compliant device and illustrated with its application to knee-joint kinematic analysis. Regarding the joint articulation as boundary constraints for the compliant mechanism, the equivalent articular geometry is constructed from the beam deformations driven by knee motions, where the continuous deformations are estimated with strain data from the embedded sensors. Both simulated analysis and experimental validation are presented to justify the proposed method.

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces more native rollback and laxity than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: A matched pair cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

A growing body of evidence supports that kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) provides superior clinical outcomes and satisfaction than mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. In theory, KA TKA would restore knee kinematics closer to the native condition than MA TKA, but the current biomechanical evidence is lacking.

HYPOTHESIS

KA TKA would restore knee biomechanics to the native condition better than MA TKA.

METHODS

Seven pairs of cadavers were tested. For each pair, one knee was randomly assigned to KA TKA and the other to MA TKA. During KA TKA, the sizes of femur and tibia resections were equivalent to implant thickness to align with the patient-specific joint line. MA TKA was performed using conventional measured resection techniques. All specimens were mounted on a customized knee-testing system and digitized. Knee motions measured during flexion included rollback, axial tibiofemoral rotation, and laxities, specifically varus-valgus laxity, anterior-posterior translation, and internal-external rotation.

RESULTS

The pattern of knee motion following KA TKA was similar to the native knee. However, following MA TKA, both medial and lateral rollback and tibiofemoral axial rotation were decreased relative to those of the native knee. Valgus laxity was restored only after KA TKA, whereas varus laxity was restored only after MA TKA. Anterior translation was increased regardless of the alignment strategy. In addition, rotational laxities were restored after KA TKA, but external rotation laxity increased after MA TKA.

CONCLUSION

KA TKA restores femoral rollback and laxity to the native condition better than MA TKA. KA TKA may enhance functional performance and provide a more normal knee sensation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Controlled laboratory study.

Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces native patellofemoral biomechanics during deep knee flexion

PURPOSE

The implant positioning for kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA) differs fundamentally from conventional mechanically aligned TKA. This difference may affect patellofemoral (PF) biomechanics after TKA. This cadaveric study tested the hypothesis that kinematically aligned TKA would restore PF biomechanics to the native condition better than mechanically aligned TKA.

METHODS

Seven pairs (14 knees) of fresh-frozen cadavers were tested. All specimens were mounted on a customized knee-testing system and digitized using a Microscribe 3DLX instrument (Revware Inc., Raleigh, NC, USA) to measure patellar kinematics in terms of patellar varus/valgus rotation, medial/lateral position, flexion/extension rotation and proximal/distal position at knee flexion angles of 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120°. The medial and lateral PF joint contact pressure distributions at 120° of knee flexion were measured using a K-scan system (Tekscan Inc., Boston, MA, USA). All patellae remained unresurfaced. For each pair, one knee was randomly assigned to kinematically aligned TKA and the other to mechanically aligned TKA performed using the conventional measured resection technique. During kinematically aligned TKA, the amount of femur and tibia resected was equivalent to implant thickness to maintain the patient-specific joint line. All patellar kinematics were measured and compared between the native condition and after surgery.

RESULTS

The patellae of mechanically aligned TKA rotated more valgus and was positioned more laterally compared with those of kinematically aligned TKA at knee flexion angles ≥ 90°. Neither the patellar flexion/extension rotation nor the proximal/distal position differed between either prosthetic knee design and the native knee at all flexion angles. The contact pressure distribution between the medial and lateral PF joint after kinematically aligned TKA were similar to those of the native knee, while the lateral PF joint contact pressure after mechanically aligned TKA was higher than that of the native knee (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Kinematically aligned TKA better restores patellar kinematics and PF contact pressure distribution to the native condition than mechanically aligned TKA during deep knee flexion. These findings provide clues to understand why kinematically aligned TKA is associated with less anterior knee pain and better PF functional performance compared to mechanically aligned TKA. Patients undergoing kinematically aligned TKA may experience a more normal feeling during deep knee flexion activities.