Intraoperative fluoroscopy during MPFL reconstruction improves the accuracy of the femoral tunnel position

Editorial Commentary: Proper Femoral Tunnel Placement for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Requires Optimal Radiographic Technique

Femoral tunnel malposition has been shown to be a risk factor for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction failure. Palpation of the "saddle point" between the adductor tubercle and medial epicondyle can be an effective strategy; however, compared to using fluoroscopy, tunnel placement using palpation alone may result in significantly more frequent malposition. Accordingly, use of radiographic landmarks has gained in popularity. However, the technique is not without its pitfalls. The first issue lies with obtaining an adequate x-ray. Deviation from a true lateral x-ray by as little as 5° can result in significant tunnel malposition. Including sufficient visible femoral shaft is also required; a minimum requirement is 4 cm. The literature widely varies as to the anatomic, fluoroscopic position. Schottle's point (1.3 mm anterior to the posterior cortical extension line) is the most well studied.

Palpation and fluoroscopy are valid but unreliable for the assessment of femoral tunnel position after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of two techniques, palpation and fluoroscopy, for assessing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction femoral tunnel position accuracy.

METHODS

Twenty-one fresh frozen cadaveric knees had an MPFL femoral tunnel drilled and filled with a metal screw. Tunnels were created in a nonstandard fashion to ensure the sample included a range of tunnel positions from poor to ideal. Six experienced sport medicine and arthroscopy surgeons evaluated the placement of the femoral tunnel by palpating the screw in relation to anatomic landmarks and by fluoroscopy related to Schöttle's Point. They evaluated 1) the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement, 2) the direction of tunnel error, and 3) the clinical acceptability of the tunnel position. Validity measures included sensitivity, specificity, and correlation to clinical acceptability, which were calculated for the palpation and fluoroscopic assessments. Reliability measures included interrater reliability (ICC 2,k) for femoral tunnel accuracy and percent agreement of the raters' tunnel direction assessment.

RESULTS

The palpation method demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.79 and specificity of 0.84 for assessing the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement, while the fluoroscopic method showed a sensitivity of 0.83 and specificity of 0.92. Pearson correlation coefficients for clinical acceptability of tunnel position were high, with both techniques ranging from .589 to .854. Interrater reliability for the palpation and fluoroscopic techniques for assessment of tunnel accuracy were 0.31 and 0.55 (ICC 2,k), respectively. Assessment of the direction of tunnel error was good with the fluoroscopic technique slightly more accurate than palpation.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that both palpation and fluoroscopy are valid techniques for assessing femoral tunnel position after MPFL reconstruction. Despite demonstrating good validity, the accuracy of assessing tunnel position was unreliable in a group of six experienced knee surgeons. Further research into MPFL reconstruction femoral tunnel assessment techniques, including patient-specific reference standards, is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

Radiographic Landmark Measurements for the Femoral Footprint of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex May Be Affected by Visible Femoral Shaft Length on Lateral Knee Radiographs

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of visible femoral shaft length on the accuracy of radiographic landmarks of the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC).

METHODS

In 9 cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and its proximal and distal boundaries were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were assessed in 1-cm length increments, beginning 1 cm proximal to the medial condyle and continuing proximally to 8 cm. The MPFC midpoint was described on each image relative to the posterior cortical line of the femur and a line perpendicular to this line through the proximal margin of the medial condyle. In addition, the MPFC midpoint was assessed relative to a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

RESULTS

Using the posterior cortical line as a reference, the MPFC radiographic landmark moved anteriorly with decreasing visible femoral shaft on radiographs, particularly at 4 cm and less. However, no proximal-distal change was noted. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a relationship between visible femoral shaft and MPFC position on radiographs (R = 0.461, R2 = 0.212, B = -0.636, P < .001). For every centimeter decrease in the visible femoral shaft, the radiographic MPFC footprint moved anteriorly by 0.636 mm. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that a minimum of 4 cm of femoral shaft on lateral radiographs is required for accurate MPFC footprint localization (area under the curve = 0.80; sensitivity = 76.7%; specificity = 69.0%; P < .001). In contrast, no anterior-posterior change was seen when referencing a line from the proximal posterior cortex to the midpoint of Blumensaat line.

CONCLUSIONS

When using the posterior cortical line to identify the midpoint of the MPFC, at least 4 cm of femoral shaft should be visible for accurate assessment. If less than 4 cm of shaft is visible, a line through the midpoint of Blumensaat line and the proximal posterior cortex can be used as an alternative method to estimate the position of the femoral footprint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As fluoroscopy is frequently used intraoperatively for MPFC reconstruction, our findings may serve as a guide when assessing femoral tunnel placement on fluoroscopy.

Medium-term outcome of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using synthetic graft

BACKGROUND

Recurrent patella instability is a common and debilitating condition which affects mainly adolescents and young adults. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is the most popular surgical treatment for recurrent patella instability. The most common graft choice in the literature is ipsilateral hamstring tendon (gracilis or semitendinosis) but the complication rate remains high (11-26%). Conversely, there are very few papers on the use of modern, synthetic grafts.

METHODS

A total of 85 patients who underwent MPFL reconstruction using a modern, synthetic graft (Xiros, UK) from 2014 to 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Exclusion criteria were patella alta, malalignment, trochlea dysplasia and significant pain between episodes of instability. The author has developed an operative technique which is anatomic, minimally invasive and reproducible. Pre- and post-operative Kujala and Oxford knee scores were collected and analysed.

RESULTS

The male to female ratio was 27:58, the average age was 28 years, and the follow up range was 1-9 years (mean follow up 4.84 years). We found a statistically significant improvement in mean Kujala and Oxford knee scores (P < 0.001) postoperatively. No major complications such as knee stiffness, soft tissue reaction, re-dislocation, patella fracture were identified in the series. There were nine minor complications (10.6%): five cases of medial knee pain, two cases of residual instability and two of superficial infection.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that modern, synthetic graft is a viable option for MPFL reconstruction. The technique described, achieves good clinical outcomes with low complication rates when compared with the published literature.

A Novel Technique of Arthroscopic Femoral Tunnel Placement during Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation

Recurrent patellar dislocation is a commonly encountered patellofemoral disease. Prompt surgical intervention is indicated for recurrent dislocation to restore patellofemoral stability. As one of the most preferred procedures, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction has been implemented on a large scale. Femoral tunnel placement remains a crucial technical issue during MPFL reconstruction and is critical to ensure the isometry and proper tension of the graft. Currently, visual-palpatory anatomic landmarks and fluoroscopy-guided radiographic landmarks comprise the main approaches to intraoperative femoral tunnel positioning. However, the accuracy of both methods has been questioned. This article introduces an arthroscopic femoral tunnel placement technique. Apart from traditional anteromedial and anterolateral portals, two auxiliary arthroscopic portals are specially designed. The adductor tubercle, the medial epicondyle and the posterior edge are selected as main anatomic landmarks and are directly visualized in sequence under arthroscope. The relative position between the femoral attachment of the MPFL and the three landmarks is measured on preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography, providing semi-quantified reference for intraoperative localization. This technique achieves minimally invasive tunnel placement without X-ray exposure, and especially suits obese patients for whom palpatory methods are difficult to perform.

Accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: anatomic insertion leads to better clinical outcome

PURPOSE

The medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) is considered the primary restraint against patellar dislocation and its reconstruction is indicated in recurrent patellar instability. An anatomical positioning of MPFL femoral insertion is recommended to achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes and prevent osteoarthritis (OA) due to an altered kinematics. The purpose of the study was first to assess the relationship between correct femoral tunnel position and better clinical outcomes and lower patellofemoral osteoarthritis rate. Second, correlation of outcomes with factors potentially affecting the results, such as the type of graft, patellar height and trochlear dysplasia.

METHODS

Fifty-three patients (58 knees) who underwent MPFL reconstruction between 2009 and 2018 by a senior knee surgeon were retrospectively evaluated. Knee radiographs were performed before surgery, 12 months later and at last follow-up to assess trochlear dysplasia, patellar height and patellofemoral OA. The tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) value was measured on a CT scan. The accuracy of graft positioning was evaluated on sagittal radiographs according to Schöttle et al. Subjective outcomes were collected before surgery, at 12 months and at last follow-up using several validated scores.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (51 knees) with a mean age of 24.1 ± 7.4 years were included in the study. Mean follow-up was 8.9 ± 2.1 years. A significant improvement in all clinical scores was observed at 12 months and final follow-up. Anatomic Insertion (AI) of reconstructed MPFL was considered optimal in 33 (64.7%) and sub-optimal in 18 (35.3%) patients. Sub-optimal AI resulted in lower Kujala, IKCD and higher VAS score (p < 0.01); moreover, for every 1 mm distance in any direction from the ideal insertion, a decrease of 0.8 [95% CI (-1.4; -0.2)] in Kujala score and 0.8 [95% CI (-1.3; -0.3)] in IKDC was observed. At final follow-up, 8 patients presented patellofemoral OA Iwano grade 3 (15.7%): although that incidence did not correlate to graft positioning, the use the artificial ligament in all these cases appeared to be significant.

CONCLUSION

The present study confirms the importance of an optimal anatomic femoral insertion in MPFL reconstruction, reporting a significant positive correlation between graft positioning and clinical outcome. No significant correlations were found between anatomic insertion and patello-femoral OA development.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Age, body mass index, female gender, and patellofemoral cartilage degeneration predict worse patient outcome after patellofemoral instability surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate predicting factors for patient-reported outcomes and revision interventions following surgical treatment of patients with patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

From a prospective database at the university Orthopedic Department, 138 knees from 116 patients who underwent patellofemoral instability surgery (2012-2019) were enrolled in a retrospective analysis: 34 cases of isolated MPFLrec; 92 cases of MPFLrec plus tibial tuberosity transfer; and 12 cases of MPFLrec plus trochleoplasty. Patient-reported outcome measures were recorded for knee-specific function (KOOS), general quality of life (EQ-5D), and activity level (Tegner scale). Post-operative revision interventions were also actively recorded. As potential predicting factors, patient demographic (gender, age, BMI) and radiographic (pre-operative: patellar height and tilt, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, trochlear dysplasia, knee osteoarthritis; post-operative: MPFL insertion point; intra-operative: isolated vs. combined procedures, chondropenia severity score) parameters were analyzed using multivariate linear regression models.

RESULTS

With median follow-up of 4.4 (1.0-8.9) years, all patient-reported outcome measures had significantly improved from pre-operative levels: KOOS cumulative, from 71 (15) to 78 (16); EQ-5D, from 0.68 (0.20) to 0.78 (0.21); and Tegner activity scale, from 3 (0-10) to 4 (0-10). No patellofemoral instability revision procedures were performed. One-fifth (27/138) of the operated knees required second surgical interventions, predominately due to hardware or arthrofibrosis. Patients who required post-operative knee manipulation under anesthesia or arthroscopic debridement showed lower post-operative improvement for KOOS cumulative and EQ-5D. Age, BMI, patellofemoral knee osteoarthritis, and shorter follow-up time revealed significant negative correlations to some of the post-operative KOOS subscales. Age was negatively correlated to post-operative EQ-5D, while post-operative Tegner activity scale was negatively correlated to female gender and patellofemoral chondropenia severity score. Femoral MPFL insertion point revealed no association with any outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Patellofemoral instability surgery for isolated or combined MPFLrec is safe and substantially improves knee function and patient quality of life and activity levels. Serious adverse events are rare, with no recurrent patellofemoral instability. Patients who required post-operative knee manipulation or arthroscopic debridement showed less improvement in subjective measures of treatment outcomes. Older age, higher BMI, worse pre-operative patellofemoral cartilage status, and female gender had negative effects on outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Landmarks Used in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Have Variable Topography

Purpose

To describe the morphology of the adductor tubercle (AT), medial epicondyle (ME), and gastrocnemius tubercle (GT); to quantify their relationships to the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) footprint location; and to classify the reliability of each landmark based on measurement variability.

Methods

Eight cadaveric specimens were dissected to expose the following landmarks on the femur: MPFL footprint, AT, ME, and GT. Using the MicroScribe 3D digitizer, each landmark was projected into a 3-dimensional coordinate system and reconstructed into a complex, closed polygon. For each specimen tubercle, the base surface area, volume, height, base:height ratio, sulcus point, and distance from the MPFL footprint center were calculated. Levene's test was performed to evaluate differences in variance of the morphologic parameters between the three osseous structures.

Results

The ME had significantly greater variance in volume than the GT (P = .032), and the AT (17.5 ± 3.9) and GT (19.5 ± 3.6) were significantly less variable in base:height ratio than the ME (95.3 ± 19.2; P < .001). The GT was the closest to the MPFL footprint center (7.1 ± 3.1 mm) compared with the AT (13.4 ± 3.6 mm, P = .002) and ME (13.2 ± 2.7 mm, P = .003). However, the tubercles were equally variable in terms of distance to the MPFL footprint center (P = .86). Lastly, the sulcus point was estimated to be on average 1.9 ± 2.9 mm distal and 2.0 ± 2.0 mm posterior to the MPFL center point.

Conclusions

The 3 major osseous landmarks of the medial femur have significantly different variances in volume and base:height ratio. Specifically, the variability and elongated morphology of the ME differentiated this landmark from the AT and GT, which demonstrated the most consistent morphology.

Clinical Relevance

The results of this study may be useful to accurately locate landmarks for femoral tunnel placement and determine the isometric MPFL point during reconstruction.

Radiographic Landmarks for the Femoral Attachment of the Medial Patellofemoral Complex: A Cadaveric Study

PURPOSE

To report the radiographic landmarks for the medial patellofemoral complex (MPFC) footprint on the medial femur and describe the difference between the radiographic positions corresponding to the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) and medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) fibers.

METHODS

In 8 unpaired cadaveric knees, the MPFC footprint was exposed on the medial femur, and the proximal and distal boundaries of the footprint were marked. Lateral fluoroscopic images of the knee were obtained and analyzed using Image J. The proximal boundary corresponding to the MQTFL, the MPFC midpoint, and distal boundary corresponding to the MPFL were described radiographically and compared for differences in position.

RESULTS

The proximal MQTFL footprint was 0.8 ± 0.6 mm anterior (P = .013) and 5.2 ± 1.8 mm proximal to the MPFC midpoint (P <.001), whereas the distal MPFL footprint was 0.8 ± 0.7 mm posterior (P = .012) and 5.9 ± 1.1 mm distal to the radiographic MPFC midpoint (P <.001). The radiographic point corresponding to the distal MPFL footprint was 0.8 ± 0.9 mm posterior (P = .011) and 11.1 ± 2.3 mm distal to the radiographic point of the proximal MQTFL footprint (P <.001). When using the point of intersection of the posterior cortical line and the proximal posterior condyle as a reference, 91.6% of all points correlating to the MQTFL, MPFC midpoint and MPFL, were within 10 mm in any direction from this radiographic landmark.

CONCLUSIONS

On fluoroscopic imaging, the proximal MQTFL and distal MPFL fibers had significantly different radiographic positions from the MPFC midpoint on the femur. These findings should be considered when reconstructing specific components of the MPFC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

As fluoroscopy is often used intraoperatively to guide graft placement, our findings may serve as a reference when differentiating the locations of the MPFL vs MQTFL on the femur for anatomic reconstruction.

Influence of the Fluoroscopy Setting towards the Patient When Identifying the MPFL Insertion Point

(1) The malposition of the femoral tunnel in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction can lead to length changes in the MPFL graft, and an increase in medial peak pressure in the patellofemoral joint. It is the cause of 36% of all MPFL revisions. According to Schöttle et al., the creation of the drill canal should be performed in a strictly lateral radiograph. In this study, it was hypothesized that positioning the image receptor to the knee during intraoperative fluoroscopy would lead to a relevant mispositioning of the femoral tunnel, despite an always adjusted true-lateral view. (2) A total of 10 distal femurs were created from 10 knee CT scans using a 3D printer. First, true-lateral fluoroscopies were taken from lateral to medial at a 25 cm (LM25) distance from the image receptor, then from medial to lateral at a 5 cm (ML5) distance. Using the method from Schöttle, the femoral origin of the MPFL was determined when the femur was positioned distally, proximally, superiorly, and inferiorly to the image receptor. (3) The comparison of the selected MPFL insertion points according to Schöttle et al. revealed that the initial determination of the point in the ML5 view resulted in a distal and posterior shift of the point by 5.3 mm ± 1.2 mm when the point was checked in the LM25 view. In the opposite case, when the MPFL insertion was initially determined in the LM25 view and then redetermined in the ML5 view, there was a shift of 4.8 mm ± 2.2 mm anteriorly and proximally. The further positioning of the femur (distal, proximal, superior, and inferior) showed no relevant influence. (4) For fluoroscopic identification of the femoral MPFL, according to Schöttle et al., attention should be paid to the position of the fluoroscopy in addition to a true-lateral view.

Femoral tunnel malposition is the most common indication for revision medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with promising early outcomes following revision reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to identify the causes of failure of previous medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R), and to furthermore report the surgical techniques available for MPFL revision surgery.

METHODS

Four databases [PubMed, Ovid (MEDLINE), Cochrane Database, and EMBASE] were searched until September 29, 2020 for human studies pertaining to revision MPFL. Two reviewers screened the literature independently and in duplicate. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria, or the CAse REport guidelines (CARE), where appropriate.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies (one level II, one level III, two level IV, ten level V) were identified. This search resulted in a total of 76 patients with a mean age (range) of 22 (14-39) years. The patients were 75% female with a mean (range) time to revision of 24.1 (1-60) months and mean (range) follow-up of 36.2 (2-48) months. The most common indication for revision surgery was malpositioning of the femoral tunnel (38.1%), unaddressed trochlear dysplasia (18.4%), patellar fracture (11.8%). Femoral tunnel malposition was typically treated via revision MPFL-R with quadriceps tendon or semitendinosus autograft and may retain the primary graft if fixation points were altered. Unaddressed trochlear dysplasia was treated with deepening trochleoplasty with or without revision MPFL-R, and patella fracture according to the nature of the fracture pattern and bone quality. Though generally, outcomes in the revision scenario across all indications were inferior to those post-primary procedure, overall, revision patients demonstrated positive improvements in pain and instability symptoms. Transverse patella fractures treated with debridement and filling with demineralized bone matrix if required with further fixation according to the fracture pattern.

CONCLUSION

The most common causes of MPFL failure in literature published to date, in order of decreasing frequency, are: malposition of the femoral tunnel, unaddressed trochlear dysplasia, and patellar fracture. Although surgical techniques of revision MPFL-R to manage these failures were varied, promising outcomes have been reported to date. Larger prospective comparative studies would be useful to clarify optimal surgical management of MPFL-R failure at long-term follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Femoral Positioning of the Anterolateral Ligament Graft With and Without Ultrasound Location of the Lateral Epicondyle

BACKGROUND

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction, precise positioning of the ALL graft on the femur and tibia is key to achieve rotational control. The lateral femoral epicondyle is often used as a reference point for positioning of the ALL graft and can be located by palpation or with ultrasound guidance.

PURPOSE

To compare the ALL graft positioning on the femoral side between an ultrasound-guided technique and a palpation technique for the location of the lateral epicondyle.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients receiving a primary combined ACL and ALL reconstruction between June and December 2019 were included. The location of the lateral epicondyle was determined by palpation in the palpation group (n = 60) and with preoperative ultrasound guidance in the ultrasound group (n = 60). Groups were comparable in age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and operated side. The planned positioning of the femoral ALL graft was proximal and posterior to the lateral epicondyle. The effective positioning of the femoral ALL graft was evaluated on postoperative lateral radiographs. The primary outcome was location of the graft in a 10-mm quadrant posterior and proximal to the lateral epicondyle. Results were analyzed in 2 subgroups according to BMI.

RESULTS

All 60 anterolateral grafts (100%) in the ultrasound group were positioned in a 10-mm quadrant posterior and proximal to the lateral epicondyle, as opposed to 52 (87%) in the palpation group (P = .006). Errors in graft positioning with palpation occurred in overweight patients (BMI >25) as well as nonoverweight patients (P = .3).

CONCLUSION

Femoral positioning of the ALL graft posterior and proximal to the lateral epicondyle is more reproducible with ultrasound guidance when compared with palpation alone, regardless of BMI.

Using Anatomic Landmarks to Locate Schöttle's Point Was Accurate Without Fluoroscopy During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to analyze the anatomic landmarks of Schöttle's point and establish a locating method for identification.

METHODS

From 2013 to 2016, patients undergoing medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellofemoral instability were enrolled.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

at least 2 episodes of patellar dislocation.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

previous knee surgeries, open physes, severe trochlear dysplasia， tibial tuberosity lateralization, or patella alta. Group A: From January 2013 to December 2013, preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) images were obtained. Anatomic features of Schöttle's point were measured on the 3D-CT images. A Schöttle's point locating method with 2 distinct landmarks was established. Group B: From January 2014 to January 2016, consecutive MPFL reconstructions were performed. The placement of Schöttle's point was following the established method without fluoroscopy. The accuracy of femoral tunnel positions was assessed on the 3D-CT images postoperatively.

RESULTS

CT images of 53 knees were obtained in group A. Forty-seven MPFL reconstructions were performed in group B. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups regarding to demographic characteristics. The intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent for all measures (r = 0.97). In group A, Schöttle's point was 8.1 ± 0.2 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-8.5) distal to the apex of the adductor tubercle and 8.0 ± 0.3 mm (95% CI, 7.4-8.6) anterior to the posterior edge. Apex of the adductor tubercle was defined as the most convex point, and posterior edge was defined as the edge of the posteromedial cortex in the transition area between the medial condyle and femoral shaft. In group B, 44 of 47 femoral tunnels (93.6%) were considered localized in the proper zone.

CONCLUSIONS

Schöttle's point was approximately 8 mm distal to the apex of the adductor tubercle and 8 mm from the posterior edge. Schöttle's point locating method without fluoroscopy had high accuracy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Complications and Recurrence of Patellar Instability after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

Background: This study aimed to review the data available in the current literature concerning the complications and recurrence of instability following medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction for patellar instability in young and adolescent patients (those <20 years old). Methods: A systematic review was performed based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. The terms “medial patellofemoral ligament” or “MPFL” and “reconstruction” and “young” or “adolescents” or “children” were used. The inclusion criteria for the literature review comprised studies that reported the complications and recurrences of instability in patients who had undergone MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability. Results: In all, 332 patients were included in the review, of which 195 were females (63.5%) and 112 were males (36.5%), and they totaled 352 treated knees. The mean age at the time of the surgery was 14.28 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 30.17 months. A total of 16 (4.5%) complications were reported: one (0.3%) patella fracture, one (0.3%) screw removal due to intolerance, one (0.3%) infection, five (1.4%) wound complications, six (1.7%) subluxations and two (0.6%) instances of post-operative stiffness. A total of 18 (5.1%) recurrences of patellar instability were recorded. Conclusions: MPFL reconstruction in young patients can be considered an effective and safe treatment leading to clinical improvement in terms of recurrence of dislocation. No major complications related to the technique were reported, but a high level of research evidence is required to better evaluate the clinical results in a long-term follow-up.

MRI following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: assessment of imaging features found with post-operative pain, arthritis, and graft failure

OBJECTIVE

To assess MR features following MPFL reconstruction and determine their influence on post-operative pain, progressive arthritis, or graft failure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective study on 38 patients with MPFL reconstruction and a post-operative MRI between January 2010 and June 2019. Two radiologists assessed MPFL graft signal, graft thickness, femoral screw, femoral tunnel widening, and patellofemoral cartilage damage. The third performed patellofemoral instability measurements. All three assessed femoral tunnel position with final result determined by majority consensus. Imaging findings were evaluated in the setting of post-operative pain, patellofemoral arthritis, and MPFL graft failure including need for MPFL revision. Statistics included chi-square, Fisher's exact test, t test, and kappa.

RESULTS

Mean graft thickness was 6.0 ± 1.8 mm; 24% of the grafts were diffusely hypointense. Mean femoral tunnel widening was 2.5 ± 1.8 mm; 34% of the femoral screws were broken or extruded. Fifty-two percent of the patients had no interval cartilage change. Non-anatomic femoral tunnels were found in 66% of patients, including in all 9 patients requiring revision MPFL reconstruction (p = 0.013). Revised MPFL grafts had more abnormal femoral screws compared to those that did not (67% vs. 24%) (p = 0.019). Other MR features did not significantly influence the evaluated outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The need for revision MPFL reconstruction occurs more frequently when there is a non-anatomic femoral tunnel and broken or extruded femoral screws. The appearance of the MPFL graft itself is not an influencing factor for post-operative pain, progression of patellofemoral arthritis, or graft failure.

[Research progress in femoral tunnel positioning points of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction]

Objective

To review the research progress of location methods and the best femoral insertion position of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction of femoral tunnel, and provide reference for surgical treatment.

Methods

The literature about femoral insertion position of the MPFL reconstruction in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the anatomical and biomechanical characteristics of MPFL, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of femoral tunnel positioning methods were summarized.

Results

The accurate establishment of the femoral anatomical tunnel is crucial to the success of MPFL reconstruction. At present, there are mainly two kinds of methods for femoral insertion: radiographic landmark positioning method and anatomical landmark positioning method. Radiographic landmark positioning method has such advantages as small incision and simple operation, but it can not be accurately positioned for patients with severe femoral trochlear dysplasia. It is suggested to combine with the anatomical landmark positioning method. These methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, and there is no unified positioning standard. In recent years, the use of three-dimensional design software can accurately assist in the MPFL reconstruction, which has become a new trend.

Conclusion

Femoral tunnel positioning of the MPFL reconstruction is very important. The current positioning methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Personalized positioning is a new trend and has not been widely used in clinic, its effectiveness needs further research and clinical practice and verification.

Combined Total Knee Arthroplasty and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Chronic Patellar Dislocation and Severe Osteoarthritis

Chronic patellar dislocation in the setting of severe knee osteoarthritis is a rare clinical problem. Surgical management often consists of total knee arthroplasty combined with realignment of the extensor mechanism. Several techniques have been described to anatomically restore the extensor apparatus, and literature regarding this topic consists mainly of case reports. We describe a technique using combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using allograft tissue and total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing for the treatment of chronic patellar dislocation and severe osteoarthritis.

[Optimization location of femoral attachment in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction assisted with arthroscopy for patellar dislocation]

Objective

To investigate the technique of optimizing the location of femoral attachment in medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction assisted with arthroscopy and evaluate the effectiveness.

Methods

Between January 2014 and September 2018, 35 patients with patellar dislocation were admitted. There were 14 males and 21 females with an average age of 22.6 years (range, 16-38 years). All patients had a history of knee sprain. The disease duration ranged from 1 to 7 days (mean, 2.8 days). Patellar dislocation occurred 2-4 times (mean, 2.5 times). The preoperative Lysholm score and Kujala score were 47.60±11.24 and 48.37±9.79, respectively. The patellar congruence angle was (31.40±6.81)°, the patellar tilt angle was (29.95±5.44)°, the lateral patellofemoral angle was (-11.46±5.18)°, and the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance was (16.66±1.28) mm. All patients were treated by MPFL reconstruction with the semitendinosus tendon under arthroscopy. During operation, the suture anchors were inserted into the midpoint and the 1/3 point of superomedial edge of the patella. Then, the femoral tunnels were created in medial femoral condyle through limited excision. For tendon fixation, the Kirschner wires were inserted into adductor tubercle, medial epicondyle of femur, and the midpoint between the two points, as well as the anteriorly and posteriorly. Afterwards, the changes of ligament length and tension, patellar tracking, and the relationship of patella and femoral trochlea were evaluated, thereby determining the optimized femoral attachment for MPFL reconstruction. Finally, the patellar congruence angle, patellar tilt angle, and lateral patellofemoral angle were measured by imaging to assess the relationship of patella and femoral trochlea. Moreover, Lysholm score and Kujala score were used to evaluate the knee joint function.

Results

All incisions healed by first intention without infection. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 15.4 months). At 12 months, the Lysholm score was 94.40±3.99 and the Kujala score was 92.28±4.13, which were significant higher than those before operation ( P<0.05). No patellar dislocation occurred during follow-up. At 12 months, the patellar congruence angle was (6.57±4.59)°, the patellar tilt angle was (9.73±2.82)°, the lateral patellofemoral angle was (7.14±4.63)°, which were superior to those before operation ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

During the MPFL reconstruction under arthroscopy, a higher positioning accuracy for the femoral attachment and satisfactory effectiveness can be obtained by evaluating MPFL length and tension, patellofemoral joint kinematics, and patellar tracking.

Tactile techniques are associated with a high variability of tunnel positions in lateral extra-articular tenodesis procedures

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine the variability of femoral tunnel positions applying two different lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) techniques, guiding on the tactile identification (1) of the lateral epicondyle (Lemaire procedure) and (2) of the Kaplan fibre attachments on the distal femur (MacIntosh procedure) and to analyse whether one of these procedures is more suitable for reliable femoral tunnel positioning in LET procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two experienced knee surgeons determined femoral tunnel positions in ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knee specimens according to the modified Lemaire and MacIntosh techniques. Tunnel positions were measured on true lateral radiographs as absolute distances from the posterior cortex line (anterior-posterior direction) and from a perpendicular line intersecting the contact of the posterior femoral condyle (proximal-distal direction), respectively. Further, tunnel positions were measured relatively to the femur height. An independent F test was used to compare variances between Lemaire and MacIntosh tunnel positions and between anterior-posterior and proximal-distal directions.

RESULTS

The mean Lemaire and MacIntosh positions were found 2.7 ± 5.5 mm and 3.6 ± 3.4 mm anterior to the posterior cortex line, and 7.5 ± 5.0 mm and 17.3 ± 6.9 mm proximal to the perpendicular line intersecting the contact of the posterior femoral condyle, respectively. Mean Lemaire and MacIntosh positions, relative to the femur height, were found at 8.8% and 10.9% (anterior-posterior) and 22.2% and 50.8% (proximal-distal), respectively. Variability in tunnel positioning was observed for both techniques, showing no significant differences in the variance (p > 0.05) and partially overlapping tunnel positions of both techniques. The overall variance of tunnel positions, however, was significantly greater in proximal-distal than in anterior-posterior direction (F = 2.673, p < 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Femoral tunnel positions in LET procedures have a high degree of variability and inaccuracy. Palpating anatomic landmarks appears to be insufficient to generate reproducible tunnel positions. Radiographic landmarks may enable more reproducible identification of isometric femoral tunnel positions and reduce malpositioning.

Radiographic images are inapplicable for a precise evaluation of the femoral tunnel position following MPFL reconstruction

PURPOSE

In medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction, it remains controversial whether more accurate femoral tunnel positioning is correlated with improved clinical outcomes. The purpose was to verify the accuracy of methods for evaluating tunnel positioning, one of which is the use of postoperative radiographs, in determining the femoral tunnel position following MPFL reconstruction and to compare the variability of tunnel positions to the intraoperatively documented positions on a true-lateral view.

METHODS

Seventy-three consecutive MPFL reconstructions were prospectively enrolled. Femoral tunnel positions were intraoperatively determined using fluoroscopy to obtain true-lateral radiographs. Postoperatively, lateral radiographic images were taken. Seven independent radiologists and seven independent orthopaedic knee surgeons evaluated the femoral tunnel position and amount of malrotation for each radiograph. Deviations from the Schoettle's point were measured and repeated after 4 weeks. Intraobserver and interobserver analyses of variance were calculated to determine the reliability of measurements on both intraoperative and postoperative radiographs.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were included in the final analysis. Tunnel positions were unable to be identified on postoperative radiographs in 14% of cases on average, independent of the degree of radiograph rotation. Intraoperative images showed mean deviations from the tunnel position to the centre of Schoettle's point of 1.9 ± 1.4 mm and 1.6 ± 1.0 mm in anterior-posterior and proximal-distal direction, respectively. Postoperative radiographs showed mean anterior-posterior and deviations of 7.4 ± 4.4 mm and 8.9 ± 5.8 mm assessed by orthopaedic surgeons and 10.6 ± 6.3 mm and 11.6 ± 7.1 mm assessed by radiologists at first and repeated measurement, respectively. The mean proximal-distal deviations were 4.8 ± 4.4 mm and 6.5 ± 6.0 mm and 7.2 ± 6.3 mm and 8.1 ± 7.1 mm, respectively. Measurement of tunnel position on intraoperative fluoroscopic images was significantly different compared to postoperative radiographs for each of the 14 observers (p < 0.05). Significant intraobserver and interobserver differences between the first and repeat measurements for both orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists were observed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Measurement of the femoral tunnel position on postoperative lateral radiographs is not an accurate or reliable method for evaluating tunnel position after MPFL reconstruction due to exposure, contrast, and malrotation of the radiograph from a true-lateral image. In contrast, intraoperative fluoroscopic control allows for a precise lateral view and correct tunnel positioning. Thus, postoperative radiographic images may be unnecessary for the evaluation of femoral tunnel positions, particularly when intraoperative fluoroscopy has been used.

STUDY DESIGN

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Radiographic Landmarks for Femoral Tunnel Positioning in Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Procedures

BACKGROUND

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being increasingly performed as an additional procedure in both primary and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients with excessive anterolateral rotatory instability. Consistent guidelines for femoral tunnel placement would aid in intraoperative reproducible graft placement and postoperative evaluation of LET procedures.

PURPOSE

To determine radiographic landmarks of a recently described isometric femoral attachment area in LET procedures with reference to consistent radiographic reference lines.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected. The footprints of the lateral femoral epicondyle (LFE) apex and the deep aspects of the iliotibial tract, with its Kaplan fiber attachments (KFAs) on the distal femur, were marked with a 2.5-mm steel ball. True lateral radiographic images were taken. Mean absolute LFE and KFA distances were measured from the posterior cortex line (anterior-posterior direction) and from the perpendicular line intersecting the contact of the posterior femoral condyle (proximal-distal direction), respectively. Furthermore, positions were measured relative to the femur width. Finally, radiographic descriptions of an isometric femoral attachment area were developed.

RESULTS

The mean LFE and KFA positions were found to be 4 ± 4 mm posterior and 4 ± 3 mm anterior to the posterior cortex line, and 6 ± 4 mm distal and 20 ± 5 mm proximal to the perpendicular line intersecting the posterior femoral condyle, respectively. The mean LFE and KFA locations, relative to the femur width, were found at -12% and 11% (anterior-posterior) and -17% and 59% (proximal-distal), respectively. Femoral tunnel placement on or posterior to the femoral cortex line and proximal to the posterior femoral condyle within a 10-mm distance ensures that the tunnel remains safely located in the isometric zone.

CONCLUSION

Radiographic landmarks for an isometric femoral tunnel placement in LET procedures were described.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

These findings may help to intraoperatively guide surgeons for an accurate, reproducible femoral tunnel placement and to reduce the potential risk of tunnel misplacement, as well as to aid in the postoperative evaluation of LET procedures in patients with residual complaints.

The Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Is a Dynamic and Anisometric Structure: An In Vivo Study on Length Changes and Isometry

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is associated with a high rate of complications, including recurrent instability and persistent knee pain. Technical errors are among the primary causes of these complications. Understanding the effect of adjusting patellofemoral attachments on length change patterns may help surgeons to optimize graft placement during MPFL reconstruction and to reduce graft failure rates.

PURPOSE

To determine the in vivo length changes of the MPFL during dynamic, weightbearing motion and to map the isometry of the 3-dimensional wrapping paths from various attachments on the medial femoral epicondyle to the patella.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive laboratory study.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy participants were studied with a combined computed tomography and biplane fluoroscopic imaging technique during a lunge motion (full extension to ~110° of flexion). On the medial femoral epicondyle, 185 attachments were projected, including the anatomic MPFL footprint, which was divided into 5 attachments (central, proximal, distal, posterior, and anterior). The patellar MPFL area was divided into 3 possible attachments (proximal, central, and distal). The length changes of the shortest 3-dimensional wrapping paths of the various patellofemoral combinations were subsequently measured and mapped.

RESULTS

For the 3 patellar attachments, the most isometric attachment, with an approximate 4% length change, was located posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment, close to the adductor tubercle. Attachments proximal and anterior to the isometric area resulted in increasing lengths with increasing knee flexion, whereas distal and posterior attachments caused decreasing lengths with increasing knee flexion. The anatomic MPFL was tightest in extension, decreased in length until approximately 30° of flexion, and then stayed near isometric for the remainder of the motion. Changing both the femoral and patellar attachments significantly affected the length changes of the anatomic MPFL ( P < .001 for both).

CONCLUSION

The most isometric location for MPFL reconstruction was posterior and proximal to the anatomic femoral MPFL attachment. The anatomic MPFL is a dynamic, anisometric structure that was tight in extension and early flexion and near isometric beyond 30° of flexion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Proximal and anterior MPFL tunnel positioning should be avoided, and the importance of anatomic MPFL reconstruction is underscored with the results found in this study.