Combined reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral and medial patellotibial ligaments: outcomes and prognostic factors

Combined medial patellofemoral ligament and medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction in recurrent patellar instability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), along with the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament, aid in the stabilization of the patellofemoral joint. Although the MPFL is the primary stabilizer and the MPTL is a secondary limiter, this ligament is critical in maintaining joint stability. There have been few studies on the combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction and its benefits.

AIM

To look into the outcomes of combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction in frequent patellar instability.

METHODS

By May 8, 2022, four electronic databases were searched: Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. General keywords such as "patellar instability," "patellar dislocation," "MPFL," "medial patellofemoral ligament," "MPTL," and "medial patellotibial ligament" were co-searched to increase the sensitivity of the search.

RESULTS

The pooled effects of combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction for Kujala score (12-mo follow-up) and Kujala score (24-mo follow-up) were positive and incremental, according to the findings of this meta-analysis. The mean difference between the Cincinnati scores was also positive, but not statistically significant. The combination of the two surgeries reduces pain. According to cumulative meta-analysis, the trend of pain reduction in various studies is declining over time.

CONCLUSION

The combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction has good clinical results in knee function and, in addition to providing good control to maintain patellofemoral joint balance, the patient's pain level decreases over time, making it a valid surgical method for patella stabilization.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in skeletally immature patients without correction of bony risk factors leads to acceptable outcomes but higher failure rates

OBJECTIVES

To report outcomes and re-dislocation rates of medial patellar stabilizers reconstruction without bone procedures for correction of anatomical risk factors for patellar instability in skeletally immature patients; to compare isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction to combined MPFL and medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) reconstruction in this population.

METHODS

Patients with open physis and bone abnormalities including patella alta and/or increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and/or trochlear dysplasia underwent MPFL reconstruction, either isolated or associated with MPTL reconstruction. Preoperative, 1-year follow-up and the latest follow-up (5 years minimum) data were collected. Radiological and clinical evaluations were conducted, with special attention to failure rate. Comparison of results from isolated MPFL and combined MPFL/MPTL reconstructions was performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were included, 19 in the isolated MPFL group (median 14 years old; follow-up 5.8 ​± ​1.7 years) and 10 in the combined MPFL/MPTL group (median 13.5 years old; follow-up 5.2 ​± ​1.4 years). Kujala and Tegner scores increased over time, although without statistically significant differences between the two groups at the latest follow-up (p ​= ​0.840 and p ​> ​0.999, respectively). During follow-up, 5 of 19 (26.3%) isolated MPFL and 2 of 10 (20%) MPFL/MPTL reconstructions experienced recurrence of patellar dislocation (p ​> ​0.999). Trochlear dysplasia type D (p ​= ​0.028), knee rotation (p ​= ​0.009) and lateral patellar tilt angle (p ​= ​0.003) were associated with patellar instability recurrence. The isolated MPFL group showed increased laxity on physical exam at the latest follow-up compared to the 1-year follow-up (patellar glide test (p ​= ​0.002), patellar tilt test (p ​= ​0.042) and subluxation in extension (p ​= ​0.019). This increased laxity was not observed in the MPFL/MPTL group (p ​> ​0.999). Comparing both groups, the glide test was significantly better in the combined MPFL/MPTL group in comparison to the isolated MPFL reconstruction group at the latest follow-up (p ​= ​0.021).

CONCLUSION

MPFL reconstruction in isolation or combined with MPTL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients with additional uncorrected anatomical patellofemoral abnormalities leads to acceptable clinical outcomes within a minimum of 5 years follow-up, although has a high failure rate of 24.1%. Addition of a MPTL reconstruction to the MPFL may result in decreased patellar laxity on physical exams, as demonstrated by better patellar glide test, patellar tilt test and subluxation in extension.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; retrospective cohort study.

Return to Sport After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patellar instability is frequently encountered in the athletic population. Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a common strategy to treat recurrent patellar dislocation and demonstrates good clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to examine return to sport after MPFL reconstruction for patellar instability. We hypothesized that patients would resume athletic activity at a high rate and that a large proportion would return to their preoperative level of performance.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to identify articles reporting return to sport after MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation. Athletes were defined as those reporting a preoperative sport. A random-effects model was used to evaluate return to sport rates, subsequent level, and rate of instability recurrence. Meta-regression was used to compare return to sport rates in patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction without osteotomy compared with those treated with simultaneous tibial tubercle osteotomy or trochleoplasty.

RESULTS

In total, 23 articles met inclusion criteria after full-text review. A total of 930 patients were analyzed, including 786 athletes. Women represented 61.3% of all patients. The overall mean age was 21.1 years (range, 9.5-60.0 years), with a mean follow-up time of 3.0 years (range, 0.8-8.5 years). The return to sport rate was 92.8% (95% CI, 86.4-97.6). Patients returned to or surpassed their preoperative level of activity in 71.3% (95% CI, 63.7-78.4) of cases. An osteotomy was performed on 10.5% of athletes. Return to sport did not differ significantly in patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction without osteotomy versus those receiving additional osteotomy (95.4% vs 86.9%; P = .22). Patients returned to sport at a mean of 6.7 months (range, 3.0-6.4 months) postoperatively. Osteotomy did not affect return time. Complications occurred at an overall rate of 8.8%. The most common complication was recurrence of instability (1.9%; 95% CI, 0.4-4.0). The Kujala score was reported by 13 studies, with pre- and postoperative combined means of 60.3 and 90.0, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MPFL reconstruction is an effective and reliable treatment in the setting of patellofemoral instability. Surgeons can counsel their patients that they can expect a high rate of return to sport after MPFL reconstruction surgery alone or with concomitant osteotomy.

Isolated MPTL reconstruction fails to restore lateral patellar stability when compared to MPFL reconstruction

PURPOSE

To biomechanically evaluate MPTL reconstruction and compare it with two techniques for MPFL reconstruction in regard to changes in patellofemoral contact pressures and restoration of patellar stability.

METHODS

This is an experimental laboratory study in eight human cadaveric knees. None had patellofemoral cartilage lesions or trochlear dysplasia as evaluated by conventional radiographs and MRI examinations. The specimens were secured in a testing apparatus, and the quadriceps was tensioned in line with the femoral shaft. Contact pressures were measured using the TekScan sensor at 30°, 60° and 90°. The sensor was placed in the patellofemoral joint through a proximal approach between femoral shaft and quadriceps tendon to not violate the medial and lateral patellofemoral complex. TekScan data were analysed to determine mean contact pressures on the medial and lateral patellar facets. Patellar lateral displacement was evaluated with the knee positioned at 30° of flexion and 9 N of quadriceps load, then a lateral force of 22 N was applied. The same protocol was used for each condition: native, medial patellofemoral complex lesion, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) using gracilis tendon, MPFL-R using quadriceps tendon transfer, and medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction (MPTL-R) using patellar tendon transfer.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found for mean and peak contact pressures, medial or lateral, among all three techniques. However, while both techniques of MPFL-R were able to restore the medial restraint, MPTL-R failed to restore resistance to lateral patellar translation to the native state (mean lateralization of the patella [mm]: native: 9.4; lesion: 22; gracilis MPFL-R: 8.1; quadriceps MPFL-R: 11.3; MPTL-R: 23.4 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

MPTL-R and both techniques for MPFL-R did not increase patellofemoral contact pressures; however, MPTL-R failed to provide a sufficient restraint against lateral patellar translation lateral translation in 30° of flexion. It, therefore, cannot be recommended as an isolated procedure for the treatment of patellar instability.

Combined Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Medial Patellotibial Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation in Flexion

Recurrent lateral patellar dislocation can be a challenging entity to manage. It results from an imbalance between the restraints to lateralization of the patella and the forces applied to the patella within the biomechanical environment of the knee. The medial patellofemoral ligament has been recognized as the most important static soft-tissue restraint. However, the medial patellotibial ligament and medial patellomeniscal ligament are important for patellar stability at higher degrees of knee flexion. Lateral patellar dislocation in flexion poses a particularly challenging clinical entity with a combination of unique characteristics that need to be addressed to achieve optimal patellar tracking and stability. In this technical note, we describe a combined medial patellofemoral ligament and medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction technique to address lateral patellar dislocation in flexion.

Combined medial patellofemoral and medial patellotibial reconstruction for patellar instability: a PRISMA systematic review

BACKGROUND

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) works in association with the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and the medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) to impart stability to the patellofemoral joint. The anatomy and biomechanical characteristics of the MPFL have been well described but little is known about the MPTL and MPML. Several reconstruction procedures of the MPFL with semitendinosus, gracilis, patellar and quadriceps tendons, allografts and synthetic grafts have been described. No clear superiority of one surgical technique over another is evident.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were articles that reported clinical outcomes of combined reconstruction of MPTL and MPFL. The methodological quality of the articles was determined using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).

RESULTS

Nine articles were included, reporting the clinical outcomes of 197 operated knees. The surgical procedures described include hamstrings grafting and transfer of the medial patellar and quadriceps tendons with or without bony procedures to reconstruct the MPTL in association with the MPFL. Overall, good and excellent outcomes were achieved. The median CMS is 70.6 ± 14.4 (range 38 to 84).

CONCLUSION

Different techniques are reported, and outcomes are good with low rates of recurrence. The quality of the articles is variable, ranging from low to high. Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand what the adequate indications for surgery in patients with patellar instability and clinical outcomes are. Combined reconstruction of MPFL and MPTL leads to favourable clinical outcomes, supporting its role as a valid surgical procedure for patellar stabilization.

Medial Patellotibial Ligament Reconstruction Improves Patella Tracking When Combined With Medial Patellofemoral Reconstruction: An In Vitro Kinematic Study

PURPOSE

To investigate the isolated and combined effects of medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) deficiency and reconstruction on patellofemoral kinematics.

METHODS

Sixteen matched-paired female cadaveric knee specimens with a mean age of 53.5 years (range, 26-65) were tested in 5 conditions: (1) intact, (2) MPFL or MPTL cut, (3) MPFL and MPTL combined cut, (4) MPFL or MPTL reconstruction, and (5) MPFL and MPTL combined reconstruction. Dynamic testing allowed continuous analysis of kinematics from 0° to 90° of knee flexion. Knees were also tested statically using a lateral load of 45 N at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. In both dynamic and static loading tests, a motion capture system detected patellar position for each testing state to distinguish changes in patellar kinematics. Random-intercepts linear mixed-effects models were used to compare patellar kinematics.

RESULTS

The MPFL is the primary restraint to lateral translation of the patella at all knee flexion angles. MPTL deficiency alone did not create significant patella instability, but further increased instability when the MPFL was deficient. Isolated MPFL and combined reconstruction provided improved stability. Through full range of motion native patella tracking was best recreated with combined ligament reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

The MPFL plays the greatest role in medial patellar stability, but the MPTL appears to have an influence on patella tracking. This study provides further understanding to the impact of the MPFL and MPTL on patellofemoral motion with implications for reconstruction to improve stability and optimize patellofemoral tracking.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides further understanding of the role of the MPFL and MPTL on patellofemoral motion with implications for reconstruction to improve stability and optimize patellofemoral tracking.

Combined medial patellofemoral and patellotibial reconstruction with soft tissue fixation in recurrent patellar dislocation

INTRODUCTION

The medial patellofemoral and patellotibial ligaments (MPFL and MPTL) are the main passive restraints to lateral patellar translation. When nonoperative management of patellofemoral dislocations fails, surgical options can be considered to restore patellofemoral stability. Several reconstruction procedures of the MPFL with semitendinosus, gracilis, quadriceps tendon, and synthetic grafts have been described. No clear superiority of one surgical technique over another is evident.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who suffered at least two documented episodes of unilateral patellar dislocation, confirmed radiographically and at clinical examination, underwent combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction. Patients were regularly followed-up postoperatively at 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks, and then annually for a minimum of 2.5 years. Clinical and functional evaluations were performed using the modified Cincinnati rating system and the Kujala score, while anthropometry values including thigh volume and cross-sectional area of the thigh were measured before the operation and at the latest follow-up bilaterally.

RESULTS

There were 7 males and 27 females with a mean age of 26.5 ± 10.7 years (range, 13-39 years). The mean follow-up was 3.1 years (range, 2.5-4 years). The mean modified Cincinnati score Increased from 51 ± 22 preoperatively to 90 ± 19 (P = .001). The mean Kujala scores increased from 47 ± 17 preoperatively to 82 ± 17 (P = .02), with no significant differences between patients with or without osteochondral lesions (P ≥ .05), and between male and female patients (P ≥ .08). The Insall-Salvati index was 1.1 preoperatively and remained within normal range (P = .05) at the latest follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Combined reconstruction of MPFL and MPTL using an ipsilateral autologous gracilis tendon is satisfactory and effective and can be considered as suitable management option to treat recurrent dislocation of the patella. However, randomized studies are needed to compare different techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

An Updated Overview of the Anatomy and Function of the Proximal Medial Patellar Restraints (Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and the Medial Quadriceps Tendon Femoral Ligament)

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been widely accepted to function as "the primary static restraint to lateral patellar displacement." However, current growing evidence suggests that there is a complex of medial patellofemoral/tibial ligaments, both proximal [MPFL, and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL)], and distal (medial patellotibial ligament and the medial patellomeniscal ligament) which restrain lateral patellar translation at different degrees of knee flexion. Specifically, the MQTFL has gained popularity over the last decade because of pure soft tissue attachments into the extensor mechanism that allow for avoidance of drilling tunnels into the patella during reconstruction. The purpose of this article was to report on the current knowledge (anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, indications for surgery, and techniques) on the proximal medial patellar restraints, namely the MPFL and the MQTFL, collectively referred to as the proximal medial patellar restraints.