Meniscal extrusion is positively correlated with the anatomical position changes of the meniscal anterior and posterior horns, following medial meniscal allograft transplantation

Differences in Graft Tear Configurations in Medial and Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Objective Evaluations Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

Few studies have compared the characteristics of meniscal allograft tears between medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) using bone fixation.

PURPOSE

To investigate the prevalence, location, and patterns of allograft tears after MAT with the bone fixation technique and compare tear patterns between medial and lateral compartments according to the time elapsed after surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The charts of consecutive patients who underwent primary medial or lateral MAT between December 1996 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The location, pattern, and postoperative periods during which allograft tears occurred were evaluated by reviewing all series of follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and every 2 years thereafter with the patient's agreement. Postoperative periods for allograft tears were defined as the time between surgery and the follow-up MRI scan in which the meniscal tear was first confirmed. Allograft tears were compared between the medial and lateral MAT groups.

RESULTS

A total of 327 consecutive patients who underwent MAT (55 medial, 272 lateral) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidences of allograft tears after medial and lateral MATs were 32.7% and 30.9%, respectively. The mean times for tears were 80.1 ± 81.1 months and 48.9 ± 46.3 months in the medial and lateral MAT groups, respectively (P = .130). In both the medial and lateral MAT groups, allograft tears were observed mainly in the posterior horn, with complex tears being the most commonly identified tear type. In medial MATs, root tears were the second most common at 27.8%, with a significantly higher proportion than the lateral MATs (P = .014). On the other hand, in lateral MATs, meniscocapsular separation and radial tears were the second most common at 15.5% each, albeit not significantly more common than in medial MATs (P = .123 and P = .454, respectively). All root tears in medial MATs and meniscocapsular separations in lateral MATs were observed within 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in allograft tear patterns were identified between the medial and lateral MAT groups. The proportion of root tears in medial MATs was higher than that in lateral MATs; conversely, the proportion of meniscocapsular separation was more common in lateral MATs. Such tear patterns, which may require surgical repair or graft resection, were observed only within 1 year of surgery. Therefore, close observation and regular follow-up in the earlier postoperative period are necessary after medial or lateral MATs.

Extrusion After Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Is Lower or Equal With Bony Compared With Soft-Tissue Root Fixation: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To provide an update on the incidence and extent of graft extrusion after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and to systematically review the literature to identify whether the type of root fixation or additional surgical techniques may reduce the risk of graft extrusion development.

METHODS

A systematic search, in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines, was conducted using the MEDLINE database, EMBASE database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) database. Patients undergoing medial meniscal allograft transplantation (MMAT) or lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (LMAT) were included. The primary outcome measure was meniscal extrusion measured on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans taken more than 6 weeks after MAT. The following extrusion outcomes were investigated: absolute extrusion (AE), relative percentage of extrusion (RPE), and proportion of major extrusion (PME). Additional surgical techniques that reduced the risk of graft extrusion development in the included comparative studies were identified.

RESULTS

For MMAT, the pooled mean extrusion outcomes for soft-tissue versus bony fixation were as follows: AE of 3.2 mm versus 3.36 mm and RPE of 44.43% versus 33.18%. The pooled mean PME for MMAT with soft-tissue fixation was 51.62%. For LMAT, the pooled mean extrusion outcomes for soft-tissue versus bony fixation were as follows: AE of 3.72 mm versus 2.78 mm, RPE of 31.89% versus 29.47%, and PME of 64.37% versus 35.80%. Additional capsulodesis was identified as a technique to reduce LMAT extrusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that graft extrusion is a common finding after MMAT and LMAT, independent of the root fixation technique. However, MAT extrusion with bony fixation was, depending on the outcome measurement, lower than or equal to that with soft-tissue fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.

Tear patterns and locations are different between lateral and medial compartments in patients with early anatomical failure after meniscal allograft transplantation

PURPOSE

To investigate the characteristics of anatomically failed grafts within 1 year after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and compare the differences between lateral and medial MATs.

METHODS

The records of consecutive patients with anatomically failed grafts within 1 year after primary MAT between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed. Anatomical failure was defined as a tear covering > 50% of the allograft or an unstable peripheral rim. The pattern and location of the graft tears were analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging or arthroscopy.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were included. All 21 patients had anatomical failure with tears involving > 50% of the allograft, whereas 15 had an unstable peripheral rim of the allograft. The mean failure time was 6.6 ± 3.6 months in all patients (lateral MAT, n = 15; medial MAT, n = 6). In the lateral MAT group, meniscocapsular separation was the most common pattern (n = 10, 66.7%), followed by complex (n = 3, 20.0%), radial (n = 1, 6.7%), and longitudinal (n = 1, 6.7%) tear. In the medial MAT group, a root tear was the most common pattern (n = 5, 83.3%), followed by a complex tear (n = 1, 16.7%). Meanwhile, in the lateral MAT, the midbody was the most frequently affected location (n = 9, 60.0%), followed by the posterior (n = 5, 33.3%) and anterior (n = 1, 6.7%) areas; in the medial MAT group, the posterior (n = 5, 83.3%) was the most frequently affected location, followed by the anterior area (n = 1, 16.7%). Significant differences in the pattern (P = 0.002) and location (P = 0.043) of the graft tears were found between lateral and medial MATs.

CONCLUSION

In patients with early failure after MAT, meniscocapsular separation in the midbody of the lateral compartment and root tears in the posterior area of the medial compartment were the most common. Thus, surgeons are encouraged to pay extra attention to these vulnerable areas during the early period after MAT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Systematic Review of Clinical Results After Medial Meniscus Allograft Transplantation Reveals Improved Patient Reported Outcomes at Greater Than 5 Years Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To systematically summarize the medial meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) reported outcomes and evaluate whether the surgical technique is associated with allograft extrusion and knee function.

METHODS

Systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were English-language clinical studies involving arthroscopically assisted medial MAT that reported the surgical technique and the presence of graft extrusion or functional outcomes after surgery. Studies in which outcomes for medial MAT could not be separated from lateral MAT were excluded. Surgical technique, allograft-related characteristics, and clinical outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies with 328 medial MAT were included, 58.3% studies qualified as level 4 of evidence, 29.2% as level 3, and 12.5% as level 2. Allograft fixation techniques were bone plug (235/328 [71.6%]), bone bridge/trough (55/328 [16.8%]), and soft-tissue suture fixation only (38/328 [11.6%]). Relative percentage of extrusion after surgery ranged from 24.8% to 53.7%. Major extrusion (>3 mm) ranged from zero to 78%. Overall, functional scores improved after medial MAT. None of surgical techniques were associated with poor functional outcomes or extruded meniscus; however, nonanatomical placement of the anterior and posterior horns appeared to increase meniscus extrusion.

CONCLUSION

Medial MAT provides favorable outcomes, with acceptable rates of complication and failure regardless of surgical technique. Although allograft extrusion appears equivalent for both bone plug and soft-tissue fixation techniques, positioning allograft horns at the native meniscal footprint may be critical for preventing extrusion. However, the heterogeneity and low level of evidence of the studies included in this review prevent decisive conclusions regarding optimal MAT fixation techniques, clinical significance of allograft extrusion, or comparative clinical outcomes after medial MAT.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV - systematic review of Level II to IV studies.

Nonextruded Grafts Result in Better Cartilage Quality After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Quantitative 3-T MRI T2 Mapping

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported that graft extrusion after meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) is associated with deterioration of surgical outcomes. However, no study has investigated the effect of graft extrusion on the articular cartilage using objective quantitative methods.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to investigate the influence of graft extrusion on the chondroprotective effect of lateral MAT on knee articular cartilage. We hypothesized that MAT without graft extrusion would result in better cartilage quality than MAT with graft extrusion.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Altogether, 105 patients who underwent isolated lateral MAT were divided into the extrusion and nonextrusion groups based on postoperative 3-month magnetic resonance imaging. Quantitative T2 mapping was performed on pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging at midterm follow-up (mean ± SD, 3.2 ± 0.7 years). The weightbearing area of the femoral and tibial plateau articular cartilage was divided into 6 segments (F1, F2, F3, TP1, TP2, and TP3) from the anterior to posterior direction according to the meniscal coverage area. Each segment was further segmented into superficial and deep layers for zonal analysis. Longitudinal change in cartilage T2 value was compared between the groups. Lysholm scores were used to evaluate clinical function.

RESULTS

The mean T2 value of the nonextrusion group showed a significant improvement in 14 of 18 segments after lateral MAT, whereas the extrusion group demonstrated no statistically significant change. The biochemical properties of cartilage tissue as judged by quantitative T2 mapping indicated improvement in the nonextrusion group as compared with the extrusion group in the F2, TP2, and TP3 segments overall; the deep layers of the F1, F2, and TP2 segments; and the superficial layer of the TP3 segment (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that the nonextruded graft results in better cartilage properties of the knee joint after lateral MAT as compared with the extruded graft at midterm follow-up.

Editorial Commentary: Restoring Native Meniscal Anatomy With Medial Meniscus Allograft Transplantation and Augmentation of the Meniscotibial Ligament May Decrease Meniscal Graft Extrusion

While studies have shown significant clinical improvement after medial meniscus allograft transplantation (MMAT) with good long-term graft survivorship, progression to osteoarthritis still occurs, even in the presence of intact grafts. Several factors can potentially explain the lack of chondroprotection despite graft survivorship, including meniscal degeneration, tearing, and remodeling after the initial procedure. A major factor contributing to progression of osteoarthritis is meniscal extrusion, which is seen in up to 60% of patients and seems to be more of an issue in medial meniscus transplantation compared to lateral and is present even immediately postoperatively. Grafts without extrusion provide protective effects similar to the native meniscus, while greater than 3 mm of extrusion leads to nearly complete loss of the protective effects. A reconstruction of the meniscotibial ligament, in addition to standard MMAT, may significantly decrease meniscal extrusion. Optimization of graft size, quality, and meniscal root positioning is best to prevent extrusion and restore native biomechanics.

The Long-term Chondroprotective Effect of Meniscal Allograft Transplant: A 10- to 14-Year Follow-up Study

BACKGROUND

The long-term chondroprotective effect of meniscal allograft transplant (MAT) and its superiority over meniscectomy have rarely been reported.

HYPOTHESIS

MAT would reduce osteoarthritis (OA) progression when compared with the meniscus-deficient knee. Graft extrusion distance would strongly affect the chondroprotective effect of the MAT.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 17 knees receiving MAT were followed up as the MAT group. The MAT group was further divided into the nonextrusion subgroup (n = 9) and the extrusion subgroup (n = 8) according to 3-mm extrusion on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) coronal section. A further 26 consecutive patients receiving meniscectomy in the same period were followed up as the ME group. The healthy control group consisted of healthy contralateral legs chosen from the MAT and ME groups (n = 27). Joint space width (JSW) narrowing was measured on radiographs. Three-dimensional MRI with a T2 mapping sequence was used to quantitatively analyze cartilage degeneration and meniscal allograft extrusion in 5 directions (0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180°). The cartilage degeneration index (CDI) was calculated according to the size and degree of the chondral lesions on MRI scans. The correlation between the CDI increase and the extrusion distance was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 11.3 years (range, 10-14 years). The MAT group had moderate superiority in chondral protection with less JSW narrowing (0.58 ± 0.66 mm) and CDI increase (1132 ± 1589) compared with the ME group (JSW narrowing: 1.26 ± 1.13 mm, P = .025; CDI increase: 2182 ± 1958, P = .079). The JSW narrowing (0.71 ± 0.80 mm; P = .186) and CDI increase (2004 ± 1965; P = .830) of the extrusion subgroup were close to those of the ME group, demonstrating that a 3-mm extrusion led to complete loss of the meniscal chondroprotective effect. The nonextrusion group had significantly less JSW narrowing (0.48 ± 0.48 mm; P = .042) and CDI increase (358 ± 249; P = .011) than the ME group. The JSW narrowing of the healthy control group was 0.22 ± 0.27 mm. The cartilage T2 values of the extrusion subgroup were similar to those of the ME group, with more OA features, whereas the T2 values of the nonextrusion subgroup were closer to those of the healthy control group. The extrusion distance in the 90° direction (P = .002) and the follow-up time (P = .019) significantly affected the CDI increase in the multivariate regression model. The average extrusion distance in the 45°, 90°, and 135° directions better predicted chondroprotection compared with the other individual directions.

CONCLUSION

MAT had moderate advantages in chondroprotection compared with meniscectomy in the long term. Graft extrusion distance strongly affected the chondroprotective effect of MAT. The chondroprotective effect of the nonextruded meniscal allograft was close to that of the native meniscus, whereas the allografts with an extrusion >3 mm completely lost their function after meniscectomy.

Placement of an anatomic tibial tunnel significantly improves the medial meniscus posterior extrusion at 90° of knee flexion following medial meniscus posterior root pullout repair

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of tibial tunnel position in pullout repair for a medial meniscus (MM) posterior root tear (MMPRT) on postoperative MM extrusion.

METHODS

Thirty patients (median age 63 years, range 35-72 years) who underwent transtibial pullout repairs for MMPRTs were included. Three-dimensional computed tomography images of the tibial surface were evaluated using a rectangular measurement grid for assessment of tibial tunnel position and MM posterior root attachment. Preoperative and postoperative MM medial extrusion (MMME) and posterior extrusion (MMPE) at 10° and 90° knee flexion were measured using open magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

Tibial tunnel centers were located more anteriorly and more medially than the anatomic center (median distance 5.8 mm, range 0-9.3 mm). The postoperative MMPE at 90° knee flexion was significantly reduced after pullout repair, although there was no significant reduction in MMME or MMPE at 10° knee flexion after surgery. In the correlation analysis of the displacement between the anatomic center to the tibial tunnel center and improvements in MMME, and MMPE at 10° and 90° knee flexion, there was a significant positive correlation between percentage distance and improvement of MMPE at 90° knee flexion.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the nearer the tibial tunnel position to the anatomic attachment of the MM posterior root, the more effective the reduction in MMPE at 90° knee flexion. Our results emphasize that an anatomic tibial tunnel should be created in the MM posterior root to improve the postoperative MMPE and protect the articular cartilage in a knee flexion position. Placement of an anatomic tibial tunnel significantly improves the MMPE at 90° of knee flexion after MM posterior root pullout repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Progression of Allograft Extrusion in Both the Coronal and Sagittal Planes at Midterm Follow-up After Medial Meniscal Allograft Transplant

Background

Although many studies have examined allograft extrusion after medial meniscal allograft transplant (MMAT), it is unclear whether allograft extrusion progresses at midterm follow-up.

Hypothesis

After MMAT, allograft extrusion would not progress during the midterm follow-up period.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 30 patients who underwent MMAT between December 1996 and March 2016 were enrolled. Allograft extrusion was measured on magnetic resonance imaging scans obtained at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 3 to 7 years postoperatively. In the coronal plane, the absolute allograft extrusion and relative percentage of extrusion were measured. In the sagittal plane, the absolute and relative anterior cartilage meniscal distance and posterior cartilage meniscal distance were measured. The joint-space width (JSW) on radiographic Rosenberg view was measured at 3 time points. The axial alignment was measured preoperatively and at the midterm follow-up.

Results

In the coronal plane, there were no significant differences in absolute and relative coronal extrusions between 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively; however, the values were significantly increased at midterm follow-up compared with both of the earlier follow-up periods. Similarly, in the sagittal plane, the mean absolute and relative anterior and posterior cartilage meniscal distances were not significantly different between 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively but showed significant increases at midterm follow-up compared with both of the earlier follow-up periods. The mean preoperative axial alignment showed a positive correlation with the delta value of relative percentage of extrusion in the coronal plane (r = 0.378; P = .036). The mean JSW was 4.42 ± 0.88 mm preoperatively, 4.30 ± 0.83 mm at 1-year follow-up, and 3.96 ± 1.06 mm at the midterm follow-up. No significant difference was found between the preoperative and postoperative 1-year values, but the mean JSW was significantly decreased at midterm follow-up compared with both of the other time points (P = .001 for both).

Conclusion

Allograft extrusion did not progress until 1 year after MMAT; however, by midterm follow-up, extrusion had progressed in both the coronal and the sagittal planes. Preoperative axial alignment showed a positive correlation with allograft extrusion in the coronal plane.

Centralized anterior bone plug results in less graft extrusion in patients undergoing medial meniscus allograft transplantation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study was performed to analyze the effect of anterior bone plug positioning on clinical and radiological outcomes in patients undergoing medial meniscus allograft transplantation (M-MAT) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

Data from 24 patients who underwent M-MAT following meniscectomy and ACLR from November 2008 to June 2017 were retrospectively investigated. Patients were divided into either the centrally positioned group (group C) or the medially positioned group (group M) based on the location of the anterior bone plug for M-MAT. Clinical and radiographic follow-up was performed at two years postoperatively. International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grades of chondral lesion, graft extrusion, and meniscus signal intensity were evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at one year postoperatively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in demographics including follow-up time of two years between the two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner scores between groups. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in osteoarthritis progression or ICRS grade on MRI. However, group C showed significantly less absolute graft extrusion (P = .008) and relative graft extrusion (P < .0001) on one-year follow-up MRI, relative to group M. Meniscus signal intensity tended to be better in group C, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .092).

CONCLUSION

The centrally positioned group showed significantly less graft extrusion on MRI compared to the medially positioned group; however, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups.

Meniscal allograft transplantation: undersizing grafts can lead to increased rates of clinical and mechanical failure

PURPOSE

To assess mid-term survivorship of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) and determine the effect that pre-operative meniscal sizing has upon functional outcome and mechanical survivorship.

METHODS

A prospectively collected database of patients receiving MAT from 2001 to 2017 was analysed. Data include demographics; sizing measurements, complications, further surgery, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Allografts were fresh frozen, non-irradiated, and sized using the Pollard technique.

RESULTS

Seventy-three MATs were performed in 67 patients; mean age at MAT was 34 years (range 14-52 years). 56% were male and 62% were medial. The mean follow-up was 75 months (6.25 years). Mechanical survival at 5 and 10 years was 96% and 89.4%, respectively. There were statistically significant improvements in all PROMs; mean Lysholm score improved by 17.5 points [95% confidence interval (CI) 22.2-12.9, p < 0.001]; mean IKDC score improved significantly by 13.3 points (CI 19.3-7.4, p < 0.001); mean OKS improved by 5.6 points (CI 9.2-2.2, p < 0.002); and the median Tegner improved by 1 point. Forty-one MATs (56%) were undersized for width (range 1-11 mm). Seven MATs (10%) were undersized for length (range 1-4 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in mechanical survivorship or clinical outcomes between undersized, matched, or oversized grafts overall; however, sub-group analysis demonstrated increased failure when allografts were undersized by more than 5 mm in width.

CONCLUSIONS

MAT is an effective treatment to improve function and alleviate pain with excellent survivorship in this series. Accepting an allograft that is more than 5 mm smaller in width than pre-operative templating increases the likelihood of clinical and mechanical failure. We, therefore, urge surgeons to be familiar with the measuring process used by their individual tissue bank provider to avoid graft-host mismatch that could affect outcome.