1
|
Matković A, Ferenc T, Dimnjaković D, Jurjević N, Vidjak V, Matković BR. Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Elbow in Overhead Athletes: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:916. [PMID: 38732330 PMCID: PMC11083537 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14090916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the elbow mainly occurs in overhead athletes (OHAs). This narrative review aimed to comprehensively analyze the epidemiological data, etiological factors, clinical and imaging features, treatment options, and outcomes of OHAs with the diagnosis of elbow OCD. A literature search was performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Individuals with elbow OCD were usually 10-17 years of age with incidence and prevalence varying between studies, depending on the sport activity of the patients. The etiology of OCD lesions is multifactorial, and the main causes are believed to be repetitive trauma, the biomechanical disproportion of the articular surfaces, poor capitellar vascular supply, and inflammatory and genetic factors. Athletes usually presented with elbow pain and mechanical symptoms. The mainstay for the diagnosis of elbow OCD is MRI. The treatment of elbow OCD lesions should be conservative in cases of stable lesions, while various types of surgical treatment are suggested in unstable lesions, depending mainly on the size and localization of the lesion. The awareness of medical practitioners and the timely diagnosis of OCD lesions in OHAs are key to favorable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andro Matković
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Merkur University Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.)
| | - Thomas Ferenc
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Merkur University Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.)
| | - Damjan Dimnjaković
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nikolina Jurjević
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Merkur University Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.)
| | - Vinko Vidjak
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Merkur University Hospital, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (A.M.)
- School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ahmed AF, Alzobi OZ, Hantouly AT, Toubasi A, Farsakoury R, Alkhelaifi K, Zikria B. Complications of Elbow Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 2022; 10:23259671221137863. [PMID: 36479463 PMCID: PMC9720815 DOI: 10.1177/23259671221137863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elbow arthroscopic surgery has been popularized and has made significant progress during the past 3 decades. The elbow joint is relatively small and is in close proximity to many neurovascular structures. These factors make elbow arthroscopic surgery technically demanding and liable to complications. PURPOSE To evaluate the rate of complications after elbow arthroscopic surgery. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to perform this systematic review and meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched up to July 2021. All clinical studies that reported complications after elbow arthroscopic surgery were included; a total of 1208 articles were initially found. Case reports, reviews, abstracts, imaging studies, technique studies, nonclinical studies, and those not reporting postoperative complications were excluded. Complication rates were pooled across studies and reported as percentages. Complications were expressed as weighted proportions with 95% CIs. RESULTS A total of 95 studies (14,289 elbows) were included in the meta-analysis. The overall weighted complication rate was 11.0% (95% CI, 8.8%-13.5%), with postoperative stiffness being the most commonly encountered complication (4.5% [95% CI, 2.1%-7.6%]; 158/8818 procedures). The second most encountered complication was the need for subsequent surgery with a weighted proportion of 4.1% (95% CI, 2.9%-5.6%; 177/8853 procedures) followed by nerve injury with a weighted proportion of 3.4% (95% CI, 2.6%-4.3%; 267/13,725 procedures). The ulnar nerve was the most commonly injured nerve (2.6% [95% CI, 1.9%-3.4%]; 123/6290 procedures). CONCLUSION The results of this study showed that elbow arthroscopic surgery is a relatively safe procedure with low complication rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz F. Ahmed
- Division of Shoulder and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Osama Z. Alzobi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ashraf T. Hantouly
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ammar Toubasi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Rana Farsakoury
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | | | - Bashir Zikria
- Division of Shoulder and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Aspetar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Papen A, Schöttker-Königer T, Schäfer A, Morrison F, Hollinger B, Burkhart KJ, Nietschke R, Zimmerer A, Maffulli N, Migliorini F, Schneider MM. Reliability, validity and critical appraisal of the cross-cultural adapted German version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS-G). J Orthop Surg Res 2022; 17:328. [PMID: 35752835 PMCID: PMC9233775 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03210-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) is a rating system consisting of four dimensions to evaluate elbow performance. It is a common tool for assessment of elbow impairments worldwide. We determined the validity and reliability of its German version (MEPS-G) after cross-cultural adaptation.
Methods Six investigators examined 57 patients with elbow pathologies. The MEPS-G was compared to validated elbow scores such as the German versions of DASH, the Oxford Elbow Score, pain level and subjective elbow performance on a VAS. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) and validity of the score and its dimensions were also reviewed. Verification was performed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), the prevalence and bias with adjusted Kappa (PABAK) and the Spearman correlation.
Results The IRR of the MEPS-G score was moderate (ICC (2.1) = 0.65). The IRR of the four individual dimensions was moderate to high (KPABAK = 0.55 -0.81). Validity for the sum score (r = 0.52–0.65) and the dimensions pain (r = 0.53–0.62), range of motion (r = 0.7) and stability (r = − 0.61) was verified. The function subscale reached insufficient validity (r = 0.15–0.39). Conclusion The MEPS-G is not sufficiently valid, which is consistent with its English version. The patient-based dimensions were a weakness, demonstrating high risk of bias. There is no general recommendation for the utilization of the MEPS-G as outcome measurement for patients with elbow pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Papen
- Faculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Hildesheim, Germany
| | - T Schöttker-Königer
- Faculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Hildesheim, Germany
| | - A Schäfer
- Faculty of Social Work and Health, University of Applied Science and Art (HAWK), Hildesheim, Germany
| | - F Morrison
- German Association for Manual Therapy (DVMT e.V.), Dresden, Germany
| | - B Hollinger
- Centre for Sports Orthopedics and Special Joint Surgery, Orthopedic Hospital Markgroeningen, Markgroeningen, Germany
| | - K J Burkhart
- Arcus Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany.,University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | | | - N Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.,School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Keele University School of Medicine, Thornburrow Drive, Stoke on Trent, UK.,Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - F Migliorini
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marco M Schneider
- Arcus Sportklinik, Pforzheim, Germany. .,University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sayani J, Plotkin T, Burchette DT, Phadnis J. Treatment Strategies and Outcomes for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Capitellum. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49:4018-4029. [PMID: 33886390 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211000763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimum management of osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the capitellum is a widely debated subject. PURPOSE To better understand the efficacy of different surgical modalities and nonoperative treatment of OCD as assessed by radiological and clinical outcomes and return to sports. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS A systematic review of all treatment studies published between January 1975 and June 2020 was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 76 clinical studies, including 1463 patients, were suitable for inclusion. Aggregate analysis and subgroup analysis of individual patient data were performed to compare the functional and radiographic outcomes between the various nonoperative and surgical treatment options for capitellar OCD. A unified grading system (UGS; grades 1-4) was developed from existing validated classification systems to allow a comparison of patients with similar-grade OCD lesions in different studies according to their treatment. Patient-level data were available for 352 patients. The primary outcome measures of interest were patient-reported functional outcome, range of motion (ROM), and return to sports after treatment. The influences of the capitellar physeal status, location of the lesion, and type of sports participation were also assessed. Each outcome measure was evaluated according to the grade of OCD and treatment method (debridement/microfracture, fragment fixation, osteochondral autograft transplantation [OATS], or nonoperative treatment). RESULTS No studies reported elbow scores or ROM for nonoperatively treated patients. All surgical modalities resulted in significantly increased postoperative ROM and elbow scores for stable (UGS grades 1 and 2) and unstable lesions (UGS grades 3 and 4). There was no significant difference in the magnitude of improvement or overall scores according to the type of surgery for stable or unstable lesions. Return to sports was superior with nonoperative treatment for stable lesions, whereas surgical treatment was superior for unstable lesions. Patients with an open capitellar physis had superior ROM for stable and unstable lesions, but there was no correlation with lesion location and the outcomes of OATS versus fragment fixation for high-grade lesions. CONCLUSION Nonoperative treatment was similar in outcomes to surgical treatment for low-grade lesions, whereas surgical treatment was superior for higher grade lesions. There is currently insufficient evidence to support complex reconstructive techniques for high-grade lesions compared with microfracture/debridement alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joideep Phadnis
- Brighton and Sussex University Hospital, Brighton, UK.,Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Logli AL, Leland DP, Bernard CD, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey ME, O'Driscoll SW, Krych AJ, Wang Z, Camp CL. Capitellar Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Elbow: A Systematic Review of Osteochondral Graft Reconstruction Options. Arthroscopy 2020; 36:1747-1764. [PMID: 32035172 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.01.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Revised: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To systematically evaluate the outcomes and complications of osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) and osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA) for the surgical treatment of capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD). METHODS A literature search was conducted across 3 databases (PubMed, Cochrane, and CINAHL [Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature]) from database inception through December 2019 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Individual study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies scale. Studies were published between 2005 and 2019. RESULTS Eighteen studies consisting of 446 elbow OCD lesions treated with OAT surgery were included. There was a single OCA study eligible for inclusion. Patient ages ranged from 10 to 45 years. Of the OAT studies, 4 used autologous costal grafts whereas the remainder used autografts from the knee. Outcome measures were heterogeneously reported. A significant improvement in Timmerman-Andrews scores from preoperatively to postoperatively was reported in 9 of 10 studies. Return-to-play rates to the preinjury level of competitive play ranged from 62% to 100% across 16 studies. Significant improvement in motion, most often extension, was noted in most studies. Reported complication, reoperation, and failure rates ranged from 0% to 11%, 0% to 26%, and 0% to 20%, respectively. When used, knee autografts resulted in low donor-site morbidity (Lysholm scores, 70-100). CONCLUSIONS OAT surgery for large, unstable OCD lesions of the capitellum reliably produced good outcomes, few complications, and a high rate of return to competitive play. Complications are relatively uncommon, and donor-site morbidity is low. Less is known about the performance of OCA given the paucity of available literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV, systematic review of Level II to IV studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony L Logli
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Devin P Leland
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | | | | | - Mark E Morrey
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Shawn W O'Driscoll
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Aaron J Krych
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Zhen Wang
- Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A
| | - Christopher L Camp
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, U.S.A..
| |
Collapse
|