1
|
Zgouridou A, Kenanidis E, Potoupnis M, Tsiridis E. Global mapping of institutional and hospital-based (Level II-IV) arthroplasty registries: a scoping review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & TRAUMATOLOGY : ORTHOPEDIE TRAUMATOLOGIE 2024; 34:1219-1251. [PMID: 37768398 PMCID: PMC10858160 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-023-03691-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Four joint arthroplasty registries (JARs) levels exist based on the recorded data type. Level I JARs are national registries that record primary data. Hospital or institutional JARs (Level II-IV) document further data (patient-reported outcomes, demographic, radiographic). A worldwide list of Level II-IV JARs must be created to effectively assess and categorize these data. METHODS Our study is a systematic scoping review that followed the PRISMA guidelines and included 648 studies. Based on their publications, the study aimed to map the existing Level II-IV JARs worldwide. The secondary aim was to record their lifetime, publications' number and frequency and recognise differences with national JARs. RESULTS One hundred five Level II-IV JARs were identified. Forty-eight hospital-based, 45 institutional, and 12 regional JARs. Fifty JARs were found in America, 39 in Europe, nine in Asia, six in Oceania and one in Africa. They have published 485 cohorts, 91 case-series, 49 case-control, nine cross-sectional studies, eight registry protocols and six randomized trials. Most cohort studies were retrospective. Twenty-three per cent of papers studied patient-reported outcomes, 21.45% surgical complications, 13.73% postoperative clinical and 5.25% radiographic outcomes, and 11.88% were survival analyses. Forty-four JARs have published only one paper. Level I JARs primarily publish implant revision risk annual reports, while Level IV JARs collect comprehensive data to conduct retrospective cohort studies. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study mapping all Level II-IV JARs worldwide. Most JARs are found in Europe and America, reporting on retrospective cohorts, but only a few report on studies systematically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aikaterini Zgouridou
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, 56403, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, 10th km Thessaloniki-Thermi Rd, P.O. Box 8318, 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eustathios Kenanidis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, 56403, Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, 10th km Thessaloniki-Thermi Rd, P.O. Box 8318, 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Michael Potoupnis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, 56403, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, 10th km Thessaloniki-Thermi Rd, P.O. Box 8318, 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Tsiridis
- Academic Orthopaedic Department, Aristotle University Medical School, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Ring Road Efkarpia, 56403, Thessaloniki, Greece
- Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI)-Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTH), Balkan Center, Buildings A & B, 10th km Thessaloniki-Thermi Rd, P.O. Box 8318, 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Longo UG, De Salvatore S, Santamaria G, Indiveri A, Piergentili I, Salvatore G, De Marinis MG, Bandini B, Denaro V. Total Hip Replacement: Psychometric Validation of the Italian Version of Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041525. [PMID: 36836060 PMCID: PMC9966760 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND One million Total Hip Replacements (THA) are thought to be performed annually. To measure prosthesis awareness throughout daily activities, the FJS-12 patient-reported outcome scale was developed. This article's goal is to undertake a psychometric validation of the Italian FJS-12 among a sample of related THA patients. METHODS Between January and July 2019, data from 44 patients were retrieved. The participants were required to complete the Italian version of FJS-12 and of the WOMAC at preoperative follow-up, after two weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS The Pearson correlation coefficient between the FJS-12 and WOMAC was 0.287 (p = 0.002) at preoperative follow-up, r = 0.702 (p < 0.001) at 1 month, r = 0.516 (p < 0.001) at 3 months and r = 0.585 (p < 0.001) at 6 months. The ceiling effect surpassed the acceptable range (15%) for FJS-12 in 1 month (25.5%) and WOMAC in 6 months follow-up (27.3%). CONCLUSIONS The psychometric validation of the Italian version of this score for THA was executed with acceptable results. FJS-12 and WOMAC reported no ceiling and floor effects. Therefore, to distinguish between patients who had good or exceptional results following UKA, the FJS-12 could be a reliable score. Under the first four months, FJS-12 had a smaller ceiling effect than WOMAC. It is recommended to use this score in clinical research concerning the outcomes of THA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umile Giuseppe Longo
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-06-225411613; Fax: +39-06-225411638
| | - Sergio De Salvatore
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Santamaria
- Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Indiveri
- Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Piergentili
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Salvatore
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | | | - Benedetta Bandini
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Denaro
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 00128 Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Okafor CE, Nghiem S, Byrnes J. Are joint replacement registries associated with burden of revision changes? A real-world panel data regression analysis. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e063472. [PMID: 36639213 PMCID: PMC9843180 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The association of joint replacement registries with outcomes such as revision burden is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether joint replacement registries are associated with the burden of revision changes while controlling for confounders that could affect the association. DESIGN A longitudinal study involving a combination of cross-sectional and time series data from 1980 to 2018. The study was a panel regression analysis using the difference-in-difference method. SETTING Data from countries with joint replacement registries and countries without joint replacement registries were used. Registry data were obtained from joint replacement registries' annual reports, while non-registry data were obtained from each included country's pooled hospitals' annual revision burden reported in the literature. OUTCOME MEASURES Changes in revision burden from 1980 to 2018 was the outcome measure. The revision burden in the registry periods of registry countries was compared with the non-registry periods of registry and non-registry countries. RESULTS Data were obtained from 12 registry periods and 8 non-registry periods. The average difference in revision burden in the registry periods of registry countries relative to the non-registry periods of registry and non-registry countries was statistically significant for hip, -3.80 (95% CI (-2.50 to -5.10); p<0.001) percentage points and knee, -1.63 (95% CI (-1.00 to -2.30); p<0.001) percentage points. This translates to a 19.30%, and 21.85% reduction in revision burden for hip and knee registries, for the whole sampling period. CONCLUSION Joint replacement registries are associated with a significant reduction in the burden of revision. Although revision burden reduces over time even without the registries, the establishment of joint replacement registries is associated with an increased reduction. The establishment of joint replacement registries in non-registry countries would be a worthwhile decision as it will further improve the outcomes of arthroplasty surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Ebuka Okafor
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| | - Son Nghiem
- Department of Health Services, Research and Policy, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Joshua Byrnes
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Voskuilen R, Boonen B, Tilman P, Schotanus M, Most J. Demographics are no clinically relevant predictors of patient-reported knee osteoarthritis symptoms - Comprehensive multivariate analysis. J Orthop 2023; 35:85-92. [PMID: 36420352 PMCID: PMC9676430 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims & objectives In clinical practice, arthroplasties are predominantly indicated by clinical and radiological assessment of osteoarthritis. Pain and function are individually considered, but a comprehensive analysis of differences in symptom reporting by pre-operative factors is lacking. In the present study, we determined differences in patient reported outcome measures between demographic groups among patients admitted to total knee arthroplasty. Materials & methods Between 2010 and 2019, we collected pre-operative Oxford Knee Scores, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index, quality of life in 2555 patients undergoing primary, osteoarthritis-indicated total knee arthroplasty at Patients were categorized by sex, age (<70, 70-80, >80 years), body mass index (BMI <25, 25-30, 30-35, >35 kg/m2), American Society of Anesthesiologists -classification (ASA 1, 2, ≥3) and Charnley score (A, B1, B2, C). Symptom scores (median, IQR) were compared using bivariate and multivariate methods. Results The cohort was 60% female, 70.0 years old (69.4-70.1), and BMI was 28.9 kg/m2 (29.6-30.0). As compared to bivariate analyses, between-group differences in multivariate analyses were consistently smaller. BMI and sex remain significant predictors after adjustment for age, ASA, and Charnley. Age, ASA, and Charnley were no independent predictors of symptom scores. A group of patients (30%) reported no physical dysfunction, and less symptom severity in pain and stiffness. Conclusion This study is the first to show that differences in symptom reporting between demographic groups are partly colinear, and are negligible for prediction of symptoms. Lastly, for a significant proportion of patients, patient-reported outcome measures do not adequately present disease severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Voskuilen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Bert Boonen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Tilman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Martijn Schotanus
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Jasper Most
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Clement ND, Weir D, Deehan D. Meaningful values in the Short Form Health Survey-36 after total knee arthroplasty - an alternative to the EuroQol five-dimension index as a measure for health-related quality of life : minimal clinically important difference, minimal important change, patient-acceptable symptom state thresholds, and responsiveness. Bone Joint Res 2022; 11:477-483. [PMID: 35796196 PMCID: PMC9350705 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.117.bjr-2021-0493.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims To identify the responsiveness, minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal clinical important change (MIC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds in the 36-item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) (v2) for each of the eight dimensions and the total score following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods There were 3,321 patients undergoing primary TKA with preoperative and one-year postoperative SF-36 scores. At one-year patients were asked how satisfied they were and “How much did the knee arthroplasty surgery improve the quality of your life?”, which was graded as: great, moderate, little (n = 277), none (n = 98), or worse. Results Physical function, role limitations due to physical problems (‘role physical’), bodily pain, and the total score SF-36 scores demonstrated the greatest effect sizes (> 0.9). The MCID for each of SF-36 dimensions ranged from 1.7 for role emotional to 6.4 for bodily pain. The MICs for a cohort of patients ranged from -1.0 for general health to 11.1 for bodily pain. The MICs for an individual patient were marginally greater (one to two points) compared to those for a cohort, and ranging from 0.0 for general and mental health to 13.5 for physical function. The lowest PASS score threshold was associated with physical function (> 34 points) whereas the greatest threshold (> 69 points) was associated with mental health. Conclusion The SF-36 is a responsive tool, and the estimates for MCID, MIC, and PASS thresholds that can be used to power studies, assess whether there has been a meaningful change in patients’ health-related quality of life, and can be used as a marker of achieving patient satisfaction following TKA. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(7):477–483.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick D Clement
- Department of Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David Weir
- Department of Orthopaedics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - David Deehan
- Department of Orthopaedics, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Defining Clinically Meaningful Thresholds for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2022; 37:837-844.e3. [PMID: 35134515 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.01.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND For primary knee arthroplasties, clinically meaningful thresholds of patient-reported outcomes that associate with patient satisfaction have not been defined appropriately. METHODS In this retrospective study of 26,720 primary total knee replacements registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (2016-2018), receiver operating curve analysis was used to define minimal clinically important changes (MCICs) and patient acceptable symptom states (PASSs) with the anchor satisfaction. Patient-reported outcome measures were pain, European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions, Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Independent analyses were performed for groups, which showed statistically significant interactions with the (change in) score to achieve satisfaction in logistic regression. RESULTS In this cohort, 84.9% completed the anchor questions, of whom 71.3% with a satisfaction score ≥8. Good discriminative abilities (area under the receiving operator curve >0.8) for PASS were achieved by OKS ≥38.5, pain in activity ≤2.5, Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score ≤33, and Quality of Life-Index ≥0.813. Discriminative abilities for MCIC were not good. If assessed per baseline tercile, discrimination improved (area under the receiving operator curve >0.8) and yielded different MCICs per preoperative tercile (preoperative OKS ≤19: MCIC ≥19.5; pre-OKS 20-27: MCIC ≥14.5; pre-OKS ≥28: MCIC ≥8.5). For MCIC, the tercile method produced an 11% improved accuracy compared to one threshold for every patient. For the PASS scores, tercile-specific did not improve the accuracy of predicting satisfaction. Demographics were not clinically relevant in determining thresholds. CONCLUSION Estimating the likelihood of satisfaction with surgery is critical in shared decision-making. Patients with more preoperative symptom severity require larger changes to report satisfaction. Both in the clinic and in science, such differences must be considered when predictions of satisfaction are attempted.
Collapse
|
7
|
Singh V, Bieganowski T, Huang S, Karia R, Davidovitch RI, Schwarzkopf R. The Forgotten Joint Score patient-acceptable symptom state following primary total hip arthroplasty. Bone Jt Open 2022; 3:307-313. [PMID: 35387474 PMCID: PMC9044089 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.34.bjo-2022-0010.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) tool designed to assess artificial prosthesis awareness during daily activities following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) is the minimum cut-off value that corresponds to a patient’s satisfactory state-of-health. Despite the validity and reliability of the FJS-12 having been previously demonstrated, the PASS has yet to be clearly defined. This study aims to define the PASS of the FJS-12 following primary THA. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary elective THA from 2019 to 2020, and answered both the FJS-12 and the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (HOOS, JR) questionnaires one-year postoperatively. HOOS, JR score was used as the anchor to estimate the PASS of FJS-12. Two statistical methods were employed: the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve point, which maximized the Youden index; and 75th percentile of the cumulative percentage curve of patients who had the HOOS, JR score difference larger than the cut-off value. Results This study included 780 patients. The mean one-year FJS-12 score was 65.42 (SD 28.59). The mean one-year HOOS, JR score was 82.70 (SD 16.57). A high positive correlation between FJS-12 and HOOS, JR was found (r = 0.74; p<0.001), making the HOOS, JR a valid external anchor. The threshold score of the FJS-12 that maximized the sensitivity and specificity for detecting a PASS was 66.68 (area under the curve = 0.8). The cut-off score value computed with the 75th percentile approach was 92.20. Conclusion The PASS threshold for the FJS-12 at one year following primary THA was 66.68 and 92.20 using the ROC curve and 75th percentile approaches, respectively. These values can be used to achieve consensus about meaningful postoperative improvement to maximize the utility of the FJS-12 to evaluate and counsel patients undergoing THA. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(4):307–313.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Singh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Thomas Bieganowski
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shengnan Huang
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Karia
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roy I. Davidovitch
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ran Schwarzkopf
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Robinson PG, MacDonald DJ, Macpherson GJ, Patton JT, Clement ND. Changes and thresholds in the Forgotten Joint Score after total hip arthroplasty : minimal clinically important difference, minimal important and detectable changes, and patient-acceptable symptom state. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:1759-1765. [PMID: 34847716 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b12.bjj-2021-0384.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal important change (MIC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) in the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) according to patient satisfaction six months following total hip arthroplasty (THA) in a UK population. METHODS During a one-year period, 461 patients underwent a primary THA and completed preoperative and six-month FJS, with a mean age of 67.2 years (22 to 93). At six months, patient satisfaction was recorded as very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The difference between patients recording neutral (n = 31) and satisfied (n = 101) was used to define the MCID. MIC for a cohort was defined as the change in the FJS for those patients declaring their outcome as satisfied, whereas receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the MIC for an individual and the PASS. Distribution-based methodology was used to calculate the MDC. RESULTS Using satisfaction as the anchor, the MCID for the FJS was 8.1 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7 to 15.9; p = 0.040), which was affirmed when adjusting for confounding. The MIC for the FJS for a cohort of patients was 17.7 (95% CI 13.7 to 21.7) and for an individual patient was 18. The MDC90 for the FJS was eight, meaning that 90% of patients scoring more than this will have experienced a real change that is beyond measurement error. The PASS threshold for the FJS was defined as 29. CONCLUSION The MCID and MIC can be used respectively to assess whether there is a clinical difference between two groups, or whether a cohort or patient has had a meaningful change in their FJS. Both values were greater than measurement error (MDC90), suggesting a real change. The PASS threshold for the postoperative FJS can be used as a marker of achieving patient satisfaction following THA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(12):1759-1765.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deborah J MacDonald
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Edinburgh Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - James T Patton
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Nick D Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hamilton DF. CORR Insights®: Can the Knee Outcome and Osteoarthritis Score (KOOS) Function Subscale Be Linked to the PROMIS Physical Function to Crosswalk Equivalent Scores? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2021; 479:2665-2666. [PMID: 34351314 PMCID: PMC8726558 DOI: 10.1097/corr.0000000000001935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David F Hamilton
- Lecturer, School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
- Research Fellow, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clement ND, Scott CEH, Hamilton DF, MacDonald D, Howie CR. Meaningful values in the Forgotten Joint Score after total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B:846-854. [PMID: 33934639 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b5.bjj-2020-0396.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), minimal important change (MIC), minimal detectable change (MDC), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS) threshold in the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) according to patient satisfaction six months following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS During a one-year period 484 patients underwent a primary TKA and completed preoperative and six-month FJS and OKS. At six months patients were asked, "How satisfied are you with your operated knee?" Their response was recorded as: very satisfied, satisfied, neutral, dissatisfied, or very dissatisfied. The difference between patients recording neutral (n = 44) and satisfied (n = 153) was used to define the MCID. MIC for a cohort was defined as the change in the FJS for those patients declaring their outcome as satisfied, whereas receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the MIC for an individual and the PASS threshold. Distribution-based methodology was used to calculate the MDC. RESULTS Using satisfaction as the anchor question, the MCID for the FJS was 16.6 (95% confidence interval (CIs) 8.9 to 24.3; p < 0.001) and when adjusting for confounding this decreased to 13.7 points (95% CI 4.8 to 22.5; p < 0.001). The MIC for the FJS for a cohort of patients was 17.7 points and for an individual patient was 10 points. The MDC90 for the FGS was 12 points; where 90% of patients scoring more than this will have experienced a real change that is beyond measurement error. The PASS was defined as 22 points or more in the postoperative FJS. CONCLUSION The estimates for MCID and MIC can be used to assess whether there is clinical difference between two groups and whether a cohort/patient has had a meaningful change in their FJS, respectively. The MDC90 of 12 points suggests a value lower than this may fall within measurement error. A postoperative FJS of 22 or more was predictive of achieving PASS. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):846-854.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick D Clement
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Chloe E H Scott
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - David F Hamilton
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Ediburgh, UK
| | - Deborah MacDonald
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Colin R Howie
- Edinburgh Orthopaedics, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hamilton DF, Giesinger JM, Giesinger K. Technological developments enable measuring and using patient-reported outcomes data in orthopaedic clinical practice. World J Orthop 2020; 11:584-594. [PMID: 33362994 PMCID: PMC7745490 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i12.584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Patient-reported outcomes measures form the backbone of outcomes evaluation in orthopaedics, with most of the literature now relying on these scoring tools to measure change in patient health status. This patient-reported information is increasingly collected routinely by orthopaedic providers but use of the data is typically restricted to academic research. Developments in electronic data capture and the outcome tools themselves now allow use of this data as part of the clinical consultation. This review evaluates the role of patient reported outcomes data as a tool to enhance daily orthopaedic clinical practice, and documents how develop-ments in electronic outcome measures, computer-adaptive questionnaire design and instant graphical display of questionnaire can facilitate enhanced patient-clinician shared decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David F Hamilton
- School of Health and Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh EH114BN, United Kingdom
| | - Johannes M Giesinger
- University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
| | - Karlmeinrad Giesinger
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen 9000, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sansone V, Fennema P, Applefield RC, Marchina S, Ronco R, Pascale W, Pascale V. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian language Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) as an outcome measure for total knee arthroplasty in an Italian population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2020; 21:23. [PMID: 31926561 PMCID: PMC6955087 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2985-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background With ever-increasing numbers of patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and as TKA is performed in increasingly younger patients, patient demands and expectations have also increased. With improved patient outcomes, new PROMs with heightened discriminatory power in well-performing patients are needed. The present study aimed to translate and validate the Italian version of the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) as a tool for evaluating pre-operative through longitudinal post-operative outcomes in an Italian population. Methods In this prospective study, patients with unilateral osteoarthritis, undergoing TKA surgery between May 2015 and December 2017 were recruited to participate in the study. The FJS-12 and WOMAC were collected pre-operatively and at six and 12 months post-operatively. According to the COSMIN checklist, reliability, internal consistency, validity, responsiveness, effect size, and ceiling effects and floor effects were evaluated. Results One hundred twenty patients completed the study, 66 of which participated in the evaluation of test-retest reliability. Good test-retest reliability was found (ICC = 0.90). The FJS-12 also showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.81). Construct validity with the WOMAC, as a measure of the Pearson correlation coefficient, was moderate (r = 0.45 pre-operatively; r = 0.46 at 6 months and r = 0.42 at 12 months post-operatively). From six to 12 months, the change was slightly greater for the WOMAC than for the FJS-12 patients (effect size d = 0.94; d = 0.75, respectively). At 12-months follow-up, the ceiling effects reflecting the maximum score were 12% for the FJS-12 and 6% for the WOMAC; however, scores within 10% of the maximum score were comprised 30% of the FJS-12 scores and 59% for the WOMAC. Conclusion The Italian FJS-12 demonstrated strong measurement properties in terms of reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity in TKA patients. Furthermore, a more detailed look at ceiling effects shows a superior discriminatory capacity when compared to the WOMAC at 12-months follow-up, particularly in better-performing patients. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov NCT03805490. Registered 18 January 2019 (retrospectively registered).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerio Sansone
- Department of Orthopaedics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, MI, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Peter Fennema
- AMR Advanced Medical Research GmbH, Männedorf, Switzerland
| | - Rachel C Applefield
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Stefano Marchina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Raffaella Ronco
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, U7, stanza 2064, 20126, Milan, Italy
| | - Walter Pascale
- Department of Orthopaedics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, MI, Italy.,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy
| | - Valerio Pascale
- Department of Orthopaedics, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono, 7, 20122, Milan, MI, Italy. .,IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi, 4, 20161, Milan, MI, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|