No effect of tourniquet in primary total knee arthroplasty on muscle strength, functional outcome, patient satisfaction and health status: a randomized clinical trial

Tourniquet Effect on Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trail

BACKGROUND

Tourniquet is applied in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce intraoperative blood loss and improve view of surgical field. However, tourniquet use in TKA is still in dispute. Some researchers find that tourniquet may lead to extra side effects such as aggravated pain and limb swelling, while others consider that tourniquet has no significant adverse impact on clinical outcomes of TKA patients. This trial is conducted to evaluate tourniquet effect on TKA patients.

METHODS

A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trail is adopted with a sample size of 130 knees from August 2020 to February 2023. Patients undergoing TKA are randomly allocated to tourniquet group and non-tourniquet group. Outcomes including quadriceps thickness and stiffness, operation time, total blood loss, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, thigh circumference, knee and thigh VAS, D-Dimer and CRP level, knee function score, patient satisfaction, and complications are evaluated in this trial. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-square test, and Fisher's exact test are used in this study.

RESULTS

No significant difference in demographic information and baseline outcomes were found (p > 0.05). Participants in the tourniquet group had significantly less total blood loss and intraoperative blood loss, more postoperative blood loss, and higher D-Dimer level on postoperative day 3 when compared with non-tourniquet group (p < 0.05). Other outcomes including quadriceps thickness and stiffness, operation time, postoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, thigh circumference, knee and thigh VAS, D-Dimer level on postoperative day 1, CRP level, knee function score, patient satisfaction, and complications showed no significant difference (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Tourniquet application can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss and total blood loss, without significant side effects. Hence, we advocate the regular use of tourniquet in primary TKA.

The optimized tourniquet versus no tourniquet in total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of muscle injury, functional recovery, and knee strength

Background

Tourniquet is widely used in total knee replacement surgery because it reduces intraoperative hemorrhage and provides a comfortable surgical area for the surgeon. It's possible that its use could lead to impaired postoperative functional and motor recovery, as well as local and systemic complications. Our goal was to compare the outcomes of total knee replacement without ischemia using an optimized protocol, consisting of tourniquet inflation before skin incision and deflation after cementing, with a pressure of one hundred millimeters above systolic blood pressure and without postoperative articular suction drains.). We believed that tourniquet effectively would result in no additional muscle damage and no functional or knee strength impairment compared to no tourniquet.

Methods

In a prospective and randomized study, 60 patients with osteoarthritis were evaluated for total knee replacement, divided in two groups: 'without tourniquet' and 'optimized tourniquet'. Outcomes were mean creatine phosphokinase levels, Knee Society Score and knee isokinetic strength. Data were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Results

Creatine phosphokinase levels and functional score were similar between groups. There were no differences between groups regarding knee extension strength on the operated limbs, although the knee flexors' peak torque in the operated limb in the optimized tourniquet group was significantly higher at 6 months relative to preoperative and 3 months assessments.

Conclusions

The optimized tourniquet protocol use in total knee replacement combines the benefits of tourniquet use without compromising functional recovery and without additional muscle damage and strength deficits compared to surgery without its use.

The Impact of Tourniquet Usage on TKA Outcome: A Single-Center Prospective Trial

Background and Objectives: Total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are the most effective surgical treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. The tourniquet is used to reduce intraoperative blood loss, improving surgical field visualization. There is much controversy regarding the effectiveness and safety of using a tourniquet during total knee arthroplasties. The purpose of this prospective study is to determine the effect of tourniquet usage during TKAs on early functional outcomes and pain in our center. Materials and Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial of patients following a primary total knee replacement between October 2020 and August 2021. We recorded presurgical data, which included age, sex and knee range of motion. Intraoperatively, we measured the amount of blood aspiration and the surgical room time. After the surgery, we measured the amount of blood aspirated through the drains and the hemoglobin. We measured flexion, extension, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC score) scores for the functional evaluation. Results: We included 96 patients in the T group and 94 in the NT group, respectively, who remained until the last follow-up. Regarding blood loss, the NT group demonstrated significantly lower levels: 245 ± 97.8 mL intraoperative and 324.8 ± 151.65 mL postoperative, compared to the T group, where we recorded 276 ± 109.2 mL during the surgical procedures and 353.44 ± 101.55 mL after the surgery, (p < 0.05). We also recorded significantly shorter operative room time for the NT group, (p < 0.05). During the follow-up, we noticed postoperative improvements but without significant differences between the groups. Conclusions: We found a significant decrease in bleeding after no tourniquet usage during total knee replacements and shorter operative times. On the other hand, the knee function demonstrated no significant differences between the groups. Further studies may be required in order to assess complications.

Optimized Tourniquet Use in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative, Prospective, and Randomized Study

BACKGROUND

The results of recent studies investigating tourniquet (TNQ) use for knee arthroplasty are controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to compare patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty who did not have a TNQ to those in whom an optimized TNQ protocol was applied.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 127 patients who had knee osteoarthritis who had undergone total knee arthroplasty and randomized them into two groups: "without TNQ" and "optimized TNQ" (TNQ inflation before skin incision, deflation after cementing, with pressure one hundred millimeters of mercury above the systolic blood pressure, and without articular suction drain usage). The means of surgery and TNQ duration, blood loss, number of blood transfusions, degree of pain, edema, range of motion (ROM), functional score over time, and postoperative complications were compared between the groups. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in terms of surgical timing, blood loss, thigh and knee pain, edema, ROM, functional scores, and complications between the "without TNQ" and "optimized TNQ" groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of an optimized TNQ in primary total knee arthroplasty presents similar clinical results to surgery without a TNQ and did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications. Its use allowed surgery to occur with the benefits of a clean and dry surgical field provided by TNQ without increasing procedure-related comorbidities.

Tourniquet application in primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

The aim of this study was to identify the influence of a tourniquet on the blood loss, transfusion requirement, swelling, pain, knee function, range of motion (ROM), operation time, bone cement mantle thickness, and complications in patients operated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

Two authors independently retrieved PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of a tourniquet in TKA. Fixed- (I ²< 50%) or random-effects (I ²> 50%) models were selected to perform meta-analysis according to the value of I ². Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio were selected as the effect sizes for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

Results

A total of 29 RCTs, involving 2,512 operations (1,258 procedures with a tourniquet and 1,254 procedures without a tourniquet), were included, and 18 outcomes were compared. Tourniquet application could significantly decrease intraoperative blood loss (MD = -138.72 ml, p < 0.001), shorten operation duration (MD = -1.77 min, p < 0.001), and increase cement mantle thickness (MD = 0.17 mm, p < 0.001). However, it was significantly associated with increased postoperative pain intensity, decreased full ROM/flexion ROM/extension ROM, poorer knee function, increased knee swelling, and increased length of hospital stay (LOS) at several follow-up points (p < 0.050). No significant difference was found for postoperative draining volume, total blood loss, transfusion rate, change of Hb level, and risks of deep venous thrombosis and all complications.

Conclusions

Tourniquet application could only decrease the intraoperative blood loss but has no effectiveness on the total blood loss and transfusion requirement. On the contrary, it has a reverse effect on the pain score, knee function, ROM, swelling, and LOS.

Tourniquet Use Is Associated With Reduced Blood Loss and Fewer Reoperations in Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Although tourniquet use in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been widely studied, the outcomes associated with tourniquet use in revision TKA (rTKA) remains relatively unexplored. This study investigates surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction in association with tourniquet use during aseptic rTKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent rTKA for aseptic causes at our institution from 2011 to 2020. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts based on tourniquet inflation during the procedure. Outcomes of interest included estimated blood loss, change in hemoglobin, surgical time, length of stay, reoperation rate, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) scores.

RESULTS

Of the 1212 patients included, 1007 (83%) underwent aseptic rTKA with the use of a tourniquet and 205 (17%) without the use of a tourniquet. The mean tourniquet inflation time was 93.0 minutes (standard deviation 33.3 minutes). Blood loss was significantly less for patients in the tourniquet cohort as measured through estimated blood loss (224.1 vs 325.1 mL, P < .001) and change in preoperative to postoperative hemoglobin (1.75 vs 2.04 g/dL, P < .001). There were no statistical differences in surgical time (P = .267) and length of stay (P = .206) between the 2 groups. The reoperation rate was significantly greater for patients who did not have a tourniquet utilized (20.5% vs 15.0%, P = .038). Delta improvement in KOOS, JR scores from baseline to 3 months postoperatively did not statistically differ between the 2 cohorts (P = .560).

CONCLUSION

Although delta improvements in KOOS, JR scores were similar for both cohorts, patients who did not have a tourniquet inflated during aseptic rTKA had increased blood loss and were more likely to undergo subsequent reoperation compared to patients who did.

LEVEL III EVIDENCE

Retrospective Cohort Study.

Tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty and the risk of infection: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Purpose

The intra-operative use of tourniquets during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is common practice. The advantages of tourniquet use include decreased operating time and the creation of a bloodless visualisation field. However, tourniquet use has recently been linked with increased post-operative pain, reduced range of motion, and slower functional recovery. Importantly, there is limited evidence of the effect of tourniquet use on infection risk. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to fill this gap in the literature by synthesising data pertaining to the association between tourniquet use and infection risk in TKA.

Methods

A systematic literature search was performed on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane and clinicaltrials.gov up to May 2021. Randomized control trials were included, comparing TKA outcomes with and without tourniquet use. The primary outcome was overall infection rate. Secondary outcomes included superficial and deep infection, skin necrosis, skin blistering, DVT rate, and transfusion rate.

Results

14 RCTs with 1329 patients were included. The pooled incidence of infection in the tourniquet group (4.0%, 95% CI = 2.7–5.4) was significantly higher compared to the non-tourniquet group (2.0%, 95% CI = 1.1–3.1) with an OR of 1.9 (95% CI = 1.1–3.76, p = 0.03). The length of hospital stay, haemoglobin drop (0.33 95% CI =0.12–0.54), P = 0.002) and transfusion rates (OR of 2.7, 95%CI = 1.4–5.3, P = < 0.01) were higher in the tourniquet group than the non-tourniquet group. The difference in the length of inhospital stay was 0.24 days favouring the non-tourniquet group (95% CI = 0.10–0.38, P = < 0.01). The incidence of skin blistering (OR 2.6, 95% CI = 0.7–9.9, p = 0.17), skin necrosis (OR 3.0, 95% CI = 0.50–19.3, p = 0.25), and DVT rates (OR 1.5, 95% CI = 0.60–3.60, p = 0.36) did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion

Quantitative synthesis of the data suggested tourniquet use was associated with an increased overall risk of infection, intraoperative blood loss, need for blood transfusion and longer hospital stay. Findings of this meta-analysis do not support the routine use of tourniquet in TKA and arthroplasty surgeons should consider any potential additional risks associated with its use.

Level of evidence

meta-analysis, Level II.

The mid-term and long-term effects of tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review

PURPOSE

A tourniquet is routinely used during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to reduce intra-operative hemorrhage, though surgery without a tourniquet is becoming popular. To address concerns about the effect of blood at cement interfaces on long-term implant stability, we conducted a systematic review among patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty to determine if TKA with a tourniquet, compared to TKA without a tourniquet or with reduced tourniquet duration, is associated with better mid-term and long-term implant stability.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted without language restriction in PubMed, Cochrane database and Web of Science from conception to 17th March, 2021. Prospective cohorts, randomized and observational, that compared tourniquet use with a control group, followed patients for 3 months or more and reported outcomes concerning implant stability, limb function, pain and inflammation. Article selection, quality assessment according to the Revised Cochrane risk assessment scale and Newcastle Ottawa Scale, and data extraction were conducted in duplicate.

PROSPERO

CRD42020179020.

RESULTS

The search yielded 4868 articles, from which 16 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four prospective cohort studies, evaluating outcomes of 1884 knees, were included. Eleven RCTs were evaluated to be low overall risk of bias, five RCTs had some concerns and four cohort studies were good quality. Few studies showed benefits of tourniquet use in mid-term implant stability (1/6), pain (1/11) and limb inflammation (1/5), and long-term implant stability (1/1). One study reported a significantly improved range of motion (1/14) while another reported significantly reduced quadriceps strength (1/6) in the tourniquet group. The remaining studies reported non-significant effect of tourniquet use.

CONCLUSION

Although few studies indicated benefits of tourniquet use in mid-term pain, limb inflammation, implant loosening and function, and long-term implant loosening, the majority of studies report no significant advantage of tourniquet use in total knee arthroplasty.

Association of Use of Tourniquets During Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Elderly Patients With Post-operative Pain and Return to Function

Objective

During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), tourniquet may negatively impact post-operative functional recovery. This study aimed at investigating the effects of tourniquet on pain and return to function.

Methods

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to February 15th, 2020. Search terms included; total knee arthroplasty, tourniquet, and randomized controlled trial. RCTs evaluating the efficacies of tourniquet during and after operation were selected. Two reviewers independently extracted the data. Effect estimates with 95% CIs were pooled using the random-effects model. Dichotomous data were calculated as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Mean differences (MD) with 95% CI were used to measure the impact of consecutive results. Primary outcomes were the range of motion (ROM) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores.

Results

Thirty-three RCTs involving a total of 2,393 patients were included in this study. The mean age is 65.58 years old. Compared to no tourniquet group, the use of a tourniquet resulted in suppressed ROM on the 3rd post-operative day [MD, −4.67; (95% CI, −8.00 to −1.35)] and the 1st post-operative month [MD, −3.18; (95% CI, −5.92 to −0.44)]. Pain increased significantly when using tourniquets on the third day after surgery [MD, 0.39; (95% CI, −0.19 to 0.59)]. Moreover, tourniquets can reduce intra-operative blood loss [MD, −127.67; (95% CI, −186.83 to −68.50)], shorter operation time [MD, −3.73; (95% CI, −5.98 to −1.48)], lower transfusion rate [RR, 0.85; (95% CI, 0.73–1.00)], higher superficial wound infection rates RR, 2.43; [(5% CI, 1.04–5.67)] and higher all complication rates [RR, 1.98; (95% CI, 1.22–3.22)].

Conclusion

Moderate certainty evidence shows that the use of a tourniquet was associated with an increased risk of higher superficial wound infection rates and all complication rates. Therefore, the findings did not support the routine use of a tourniquet during TKA.

The effect of tourniquet application on the morphology and function of quadriceps in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Background

Tourniquet is currently widely used in total knee arthroplasty to reduce intraoperative blood loss. The academic view of tourniquet application in TKA is now in dispute. Some scholars argue that tourniquet may cause quadriceps injury and bring extra side effects, so they oppose the application of tourniquet. Others find that tourniquet application has no significant adverse impact on TKA patients. Regarding its advantages in reducing intraoperative blood loss, they advocate the regular application of tourniquet in TKA. Quadriceps injury is considered the main cause of tourniquet side effects. There are now many high-quality trials about tourniquet application in TKA but few of them concentrate on quadriceps morphology and function.

Methods

A prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will be adopted. The target sample is 130. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomly allocated to the tourniquet group and non-tourniquet group. The primary outcome is quadriceps thickness evaluated by ultrasound test. Secondary outcomes include quadriceps stiffness, rehabilitation outcomes, operation time, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, blood transfusion rate, thigh circumference, VAS score, opioid consumption, d-dimer and C-reactive protein level in the serum, knee function score, postoperative satisfaction score, and complications.

Discussion

This proposed study will contribute to improve evidence of tourniquet application in total knee arthroplasty. This will be a high-quality single-blind randomized controlled trial with a sufficient sample size and strict study design. It will investigate the effects of tourniquet application especially on the morphology and function of quadriceps in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty and offer advice for tourniquet application in clinical practice.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000035097. Registered on 31 July 2020

Lower total blood loss in total knee arthroplasty with a low-pressure tourniquet than without

Tourniquet-use has been described in litera- ture as a surgical factor leading to increased post-operative hidden blood loss in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis for this retro- spective study was that low-pressure tourniquet TKA would offer the benefits of tourniquet surgery without the potential negative effects on late blood loss after the procedure. Therefore, this study evaluated total (TBL) and hidden blood loss (HBL) in TKA with or without a tourniquet. We retrospectively compared two groups : one group (n= 54) undergoing TKA without a tourniquet and one group with a low-pressure tourniquet (n= 110). The outcomes compared were hemoglobin levels 2 weeks before surgery and at days 2 and 4 after surgery to calculate total and hidden blood loss, transfusion rate, and functional outcome. A higher total blood loss was observed in the no tourniquet group with a mean loss of 1073 mL against 890 mL in the tourniquet group (p-value = 0,003). Hidden blood loss values between both groups were statistically not significant : in the no-tourniquet group, Hb drop between D2 and D4 was 0.5 g/dL against 0.4 g/ dL in the low-pressure tourniquet group. The tourniquet-less group did not present with better functional scores. This study showed that low- pressure tourniquet use reduces TBL without increasing HBL in TKA.

Safety of Total Knee Arthroplasty without Using a Tourniquet in Elderly Patients

This study retrospectively compared the perioperative bleeding, hemodynamics, and clinical outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) performed with and without a tourniquet between two age groups. We grouped 103 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA based on age at surgery: <76 years and ≥76 years. Tourniquet was used for TKA until March 2010 and stopped thereafter; hence, the patients were further classified according to TKA performed with or without a tourniquet. The differences in the operation time; perioperative bleeding; estimated bleeding; and hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Ht) levels immediately, 1 day, and 7 days postoperatively were evaluated. The clinical outcomes for range of motion, and Knee Society Knee Scores preoperatively and at 4 weeks postoperatively were assessed. Operation time was longer in the ≥76-year-old non-tourniquet group. No difference was observed in estimated bleeding among the groups. Changes in the Hb and Ht levels at postoperative days 1 and 7 were negatively correlated with age but were not different for TKA performed with or without a tourniquet in the ≥76-year-old-patient group. There were no differences in clinical outcomes among the groups. TKA can be performed with or without a tourniquet in patients aged ≥ 76 years with careful assessment of postoperative anemia.

Effect of Tourniquet Use on Patient Outcomes After Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Tourniquet use is common in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but debate exists regarding its use and effect on patient outcomes. The study purpose was to compare the effect of short tourniquet (ST) time vs long tourniquet (LT) time on pain, opioid consumption, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively randomized to an ST time of 10 min vs LT time. A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary cementless robotic-assisted TKA underwent randomization, with 5 patients unable to complete follow-up, leaving 49 in the ST group and 46 in the LT cohort. Visual analog scale pain scores, morphine equivalent, serum creatine kinase, distance walked, range of motion, length of stay (LOS), surgical time, hemoglobin (Hgb), and Knee Society Scores (KSS) were prospectively collected.

RESULTS

Visual analog scale pain was statistically equivalent at 24, 48, and 72 hours and at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. Morphine equivalent consumption was 36 vs 44 (P = .03), 48 vs 50 (P = .72), 31 vs 28 (P = .57), and 4.7 vs 5.5 (P = .75) in the LT vs ST cohorts at 24 hours, 48 hours, 2weeks, and 6weeks postoperatively. Change in Hgb postoperative day 1 was 2.7 in both groups (P = .975). Postoperative day 1 creatine kinase-MB was 3.7 and 3.0 (P = .30) in LT and ST cohorts. Six-week postoperative KSS Knee and Function scores were 82.4 and 70.5 in LT group vs 80.8 and 72.3 in ST group (P = .61 and P = .63). Postoperative range of motion, LOS, and surgical time were equivalent.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates no significant advantage of ST use in primary TKA with respect to opioid consumption, patient-reported pain, KSS scores, LOS, or postoperative Hgb level.

Tourniquet use during knee arthroplasty: A Bayesian network meta-analysis on pain, function, and thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The role of a tourniquet for knee arthroplasty remains controversial. The present Bayesian network meta-analysis investigated the role of various protocols for tourniquet inflation for knee arthroplasty, assessing data on pain control, clinical and functional outcomes, and the rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In March 2021, all clinical trials investigating the role of tourniquet use for knee arthroplasty were considered for inclusion. Groups were divided into those which used a tourniquet in knee arthroplasty procedures versus those which completed the procedure without tourniquet, or with varying protocols of tourniquet use. The hierarchical random-effects model analysis was adopted in all comparisons.

RESULTS

Data from 54 articles (5497 procedures) were retrieved. The absence of tourniquet group evidenced the lowest rate of DVT, and scored the lowest in the visual analogic scale (VAS) at 24-48 h, 1, 3, and 12 months follow-up. The same group evidenced the greatest gain of motion at 3-days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up, and the highest Knee Society Rating System scores at 1, 3, and 12 months follow-up. Of the outcome data assessed, the straight-leg-raise test was markedly inconsistent: therefore, no recommendations from this test can be made.

CONCLUSION

With regards to the endpoints considered in the present study, knee arthroplasties undertaken without the use of a tourniquet perform better overall.

Time to reconsider the routine use of tourniquets in total knee arthroplasty surgery

Aims

Many surgeons choose to perform total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is a device that fits around the leg and restricts blood flow to the limb. There is a need to understand whether tourniquets are safe, and if they benefit, or harm, patients. The aim of this study was to determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in TKA surgery.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, and trial registries up to 26 March 2020. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), comparing TKA with a tourniquet versus without a tourniquet. Outcomes included: pain, function, serious adverse events (SAEs), blood loss, implant stability, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay.

Results

We included 41 RCTs with 2,819 participants. SAEs were significantly more common in the tourniquet group (53/901 vs 26/898, tourniquet vs no tourniquet respectively) (risk ratio 1.73 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 2.73). The mean pain score on the first postoperative day was 1.25 points higher (95% CI 0.32 to 2.19) in the tourniquet group. Overall blood loss did not differ between groups (mean difference 8.61 ml; 95% CI -83.76 to 100.97). The mean length of hospital stay was 0.34 days longer in the group that had surgery with a tourniquet (95% CI 0.03 to 0.64) and the mean duration of surgery was 3.7 minutes shorter (95% CI -5.53 to -1.87).

Conclusion

TKA with a tourniquet is associated with an increased risk of SAEs, pain, and a marginally longer hospital stay. The only finding in favour of tourniquet use was a shorter time in theatre. The results make it difficult to justify the routine use of a tourniquet in TKA surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):830–839.

Tourniquet use in total knee replacement surgery: a feasibility study and pilot randomised controlled trial (SAFE-TKR study)

INTRODUCTION

Tourniquets are routinely used during total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. They could increase the risk of thromboembolic events including cerebral emboli, cognitive decline, pain and other adverse events (AEs). A randomised controlled trial to assess whether tourniquet use might safely be avoided is therefore warranted but it is unclear whether such a trial would be feasible.

METHODS

In a single-site feasibility study and pilot randomised controlled trial, adults having a TKR were randomised to surgery with an inflated tourniquet versus a non-inflated tourniquet. Participants underwent brain MRI preoperatively and within 2 days postoperatively. We assessed cognition using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) and thigh pain using a Visual Analogue Scale at baseline and days 1 and 2, and 1 week postsurgery. AEs related to surgery were recorded up to 12 months.

RESULTS

We randomised 53 participants (27 tourniquet inflated and 26 tourniquet not inflated). Fifty-one participants received care per-protocol (96%) and 48 (91%) were followed up at 12 months. One new ischaemic brain lesion was detected. Of the cognitive tests, MoCA was easy to summarise, sensitive to change with lower ceiling effects compared with OCS and MMSE. There was a trend towards more thigh pain (mean 49.6 SD 30.4 vs 36.2 SD 28 at day 1) and more AEs related to surgery (21 vs 9) in participants with an inflated tourniquet compared with those with a tourniquet not inflated.

CONCLUSION

A full trial is feasible, but using MRI as a primary outcome is unlikely to be appropriate or feasible. Suitable primary outcomes would be cognition measured using MoCA, pain and AEs, all of which warrant investigation in a large multicentre trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN20873088.

Application of Tourniquet Does Not Influence Early Clinical Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction

The use of a tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still a topic of debate, given the conflicting results in the literature with respect to complications, pain, functional outcome, and blood loss. However, due to a lack of convincing data on early patient-reported outcomes (PROMS), this study aims to compare pain and functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty patients with and without a tourniquet.

Methods

A randomized controlled trial was set up at a tertiary care hospital that spanned from 1^st February 2015 to 31^st July 2018. We included all primary total knee arthroplasties performed for patients aged between 50 and 80 years. Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Numerical Pain Rating Score (NPRS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for satisfaction, active range of knee motion, and Short Form-12 Survey (SF-12) scores were collected pre-surgery and then at six-weeks and six-months interval with a p-value of 0.05 considered to be significant.

Results

Two hundred and forty patients participated in the study; 117 patients were randomized to surgery with the tourniquet inflated and 123 to surgery with the tourniquet deflated. There were 43.4% males, and 56.6% females in the tourniquet inflated group with an average age of 62.29±9.63 years while in tourniquet deflated group, there were 46.7% males and 53.3% females with a mean age of 65.41±9.042 years (p-value for age is 0.404; the p-value for gender is 0.086). 

Despite the increase in intraoperative blood loss in both the groups, there was no significant increase in blood transfusions as both groups recorded the need for postoperative blood transfusion - 12 patients in the tourniquet group and 19 in the non-tourniquet group, but this difference was statistically insignificant (p=0.231). The perioperative blood loss was significantly lower (p<0.001) in the tourniquet group (490.29±47.752) compared to in the non-tourniquet group (526.18±12.796), while the duration of surgery was comparable in both groups (p=0.156).

The length of stay for the two groups did not statistically differ (p=0.976) - the mean length of stay for the tourniquet group was 6.16±2.38 days and for the non-tourniquet group it was 6.18±2.34 days.

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding patient-reported outcomes (PROMS) at six-weeks and six-months. However, during the in-hospital stay, only the NPRS score for knee pain showed that the non-tourniquet patients had a lower NPRS compared to the tourniquet group and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.02). During the postoperative hospital stay, there was no significant difference among the two treatment groups for VAS, OKS, SF-12, and range of motion (flexion/extension).

At the six weeks follow-up, both groups had similar outcomes for the range of movements and pain scores. Besides, no difference was noted among the tourniquet and non-tourniquet groups even after a follow-up of six months. Regarding complications, 27 patients in the tourniquet group did complain of numbness during the study period compared to 10 in the non-tourniquet group (p=0.001).

Conclusion

In conclusion, a tourniquet application helps minimize intraoperative blood loss and results in a faster procedure. Furthermore, the application of the tourniquet is safe and effective and does not affect the functional outcomes and pain scale in total knee arthroplasty.

Impact of tourniquet during knee arthroplasty: a bayesian network meta-analysis of peri-operative outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The role of tourniquet during knee arthroplasty is controversial. The present study compares various tourniquet protocols using a Bayesian network meta-analysis of peri-operative data.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The present study was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA extension statement for reporting systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health interventions. The literature search was conducted in September 2020. All clinical trials investigating the role of tourniquet in knee arthroplasty were considered for inclusion. Methodological quality was assessed using Review Manager 5.3. A Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis was used in all comparisons.

RESULTS

Ultimately, pooled data from 68 studies (7413 procedures) were analysed. Significant inconsistency was found in the data relating to total estimated blood lost; no assumption could be made on this outcome. Full-time tourniquet resulted in the shortest surgical duration and lowest intra-operative blood lost, in both cases followed by incision-to-suture. The incision-to-suture protocol achieved the smallest drop in haemoglobin during the first 72 h post-operatively and the lowest rate of blood transfusion, both followed by full-time tourniquet. Hospitalisation was shortest in the absence (no-tourniquet) group, followed by the cementation-to-end group.

CONCLUSION

For knee arthroplasty, longer tourniquet use is associated with the shorter duration of surgery, lower intra-operative blood lost, lower drops in haemoglobin and fewer transfusion units. The shortest average hospitalisation was associated with no tourniquet use.

Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery

BACKGROUND

Many surgeons prefer to perform total knee replacement surgery with the aid of a tourniquet. A tourniquet is an occlusive device that restricts distal blood flow to help create a bloodless field during the procedure. A tourniquet may be associated with increased risk of pain and complications.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of tourniquet use in knee replacement surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to 26 March 2020. We searched clinicaltrials.gov, the World Health Organization trials portal, and several international registries and joint registries up to March 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing knee replacement with use of a tourniquet versus without use of a tourniquet and non-randomised studies with more than 1000 participants. Major outcomes included pain, function, global assessment of success, health-related quality of life, serious adverse events (including venous thromboembolism, infection, re-operation, and mortality), cognitive function, and survival of the implant. Minor outcomes included blood loss, economic outcomes, implant stability, and adverse events.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors screened abstracts and full texts, extracted data, performed risk of bias assessments, and assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 41 RCTs with 2819 participants. Trials included from 20 to 199 participants. Mean age ranged between 58 and 84 years. More than half of the RCTs had unclear risk of selection bias and unclear risk of performance and detection bias due to absence of blinding of participants and surgeons. Major outcomes Pain: at postoperative day 1, pain (on a scale from zero to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain) was ranked at 4.56 points after surgery without a tourniquet and at 1.25 points (MD) higher (95% CI 0.32 higher to 2.19 higher) with a tourniquet (8 studies; 577 participants), for an absolute difference of 12.5% higher pain scores (95% CI 3.2% higher to 21.9% higher) and a relative difference of 19% higher pain scores (95% CI 3.4% higher to 49% higher) with a tourniquet. Evidence for these findings was of moderate certainty, downgraded due to risk of bias. Knee replacement with a tourniquet probably led to higher postoperative pain scores at day 1, although this difference may or may not be noticeable to patients (based on a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.0). Function: at 12 months, tourniquet use probably makes little or no difference to function, based on an MCID of 5.3 for Knee Society Score (KSS) and 5.0 for Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Mean function (on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better outcomes) was 90.03 points after surgery without a tourniquet and was 0.29 points worse (95% CI 1.06 worse to 0.48 better) on a 0 to 100 scale, absolute difference was 0.29% worse (1.06% worse to 0.48% better), with a tourniquet (5 studies; 611 participants). This evidence was downgraded to moderate certainty due to risk of bias. Global assessment of success: low-certainty evidence (downgraded due to bias and imprecision) indicates that tourniquet use may have little or no effect on success. At six months, 47 of 50 (or 940 per 1000) reported overall successful treatment after surgery without a tourniquet and 47 of 50 (or 940 per 1000) with a tourniquet (risk ratio (RR) 1.0, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.10) based on one study with 100 participants. Health-related quality of life: at six months, tourniquet may have little or no effect on quality of life. The 12-Item Short Form Survey (SF-12) score (mental component from zero to 100 (100 is best)) was 54.64 after surgery without a tourniquet and 1.53 (MD) better (95% CI 0.85 worse to 3.91 better) with a tourniquet (1 study; 199 participants); absolute difference was 1.53% better (0.85% worse to 3.91% better). Evidence was of low certainty, downgraded due to risk of bias and small number of participants. Serious adverse events: the risk of serious adverse events was probably higher with tourniquet; 26 of 898 (29 per 1000) reported events following surgery without a tourniquet compared to 53 of 901 (59 per 1000) with a tourniquet (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.73) in 21 studies (1799 participants). Twenty-nine more per 1000 patients (95% CI 3 to 50 more per 1000 patients) had a serious adverse event with a tourniquet. Forty-eight (95% CI 20 to 345) participants would need to have surgery without a tourniquet to avoid one serious adverse event. This evidence was downgraded to moderate certainty due to risk of bias. Cognitive function: one study reported cognitive function as an outcome; however the data were incompletely reported and could not be extracted for analysis. Survival of implant: it is uncertain if tourniquet has an effect on implant survival due to very low certainty evidence (downgraded for bias, and twice due to very low event rates); 2 of 107 (19 per 1000) required revision surgery in the surgery with a tourniquet group compared to 1 of 107 (9 per 1000) without a tourniquet group at up to two years' follow-up (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 8.92). This equates to a 0.4% (0.7% lower to 7% more) increased absolute risk in surgery with a tourniquet.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Moderate certainty evidence shows that knee replacement surgery with a tourniquet is probably associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events. Surgery with a tourniquet is also probably associated with higher postoperative pain, although this difference may or may not be noticeable to patients. Surgery with a tourniquet does not appear to confer any clinically meaningful benefit on function, treatment success or quality of life. Further research is required to explore the effects of tourniquet use on cognitive function and implant survival, to identify any additional harms or benefits. If a tourniquet continues to be used in knee replacement surgery, patients should be informed about the potential increased risk of serious adverse events and postoperative pain.