Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint stabilization leads to significant clavicular tunnel widening in the early post-operative period

Clavicular tunnel widening after acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: comparison between single and double clavicular tunnel techniques

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) reconstruction using artificial ligaments is a common surgical treatment for Rockwood grade III or higher injuries. These techniques use bone tunnels in the clavicle and coracoid to insert the Tightrope implants. This multicenter retrospective study compares long term radiographic follow up of clavicular tunnel widening in two groups of patients with high-grade ACJ injury who underwent reconstruction using two different surgical techniques. The first group of 23 patients underwent an arthroscopic single clavicular tunnel ACJ reconstruction. The second group of 23 patiënts underwent an open double clavicular tunnel reconstruction. Inclusion criteria are Rockwood grade III or higher injury and minimum 18 months of follow-up. Exclusion criteria are distal clavicle fracture and additional stabilization techniques. Radiographic results were measured on anteroposterior shoulder radiographs taken at the first and last follow-up. Clavicular tunnel widening is the main outcome measurement. Secondary outcomes are heterotopic ligament calcifications, migration of buttons, tunnel fracture and loss of acromioclavicular reduction. The mean clavicular tunnel widening in the single clavicular tunnel technique is 1.91 mm. In the double clavicular tunnel technique, the widening of the medial tunnel is 2.52 mm and 3.59 mm in the lateral tunnel. The difference in widening between the single tunnel and the lateral tunnel is significant (p=0.003). A very clear observation on all follow-up X-rays was a reorientation of the clavicular tunnels towards the coracoid. The double clavicular tunnel technique has more tunnel widening in both tunnels compared to the single bundle technique.

Clavicular tunnel widening after coracoclavicular stabilization surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to (1) estimate the prevalence of clavicular tunnel widening (TW) after coracoclavicular stabilization surgery and its risk factors and (2) assess whether TW is correlated with clavicle fracture or loss of reduction of the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ).

METHODS

In January 2023, 3 electronic databases were searched to collect data on postoperative clavicular TW, its prevalence, magnitude, and correlation with fracture and ACJ loss of reduction. Studies were classified according to the time of surgical intervention, and the clavicular tunnels were categorized by their anatomic location. Mean differences were calculated using a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model, while binomial outcomes were pooled using the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation. Univariate and multivariate meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of several variables on the proportion of cases with TW.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies (418 shoulders) were included. At the final follow-up, evidence of clavicular TW was found in 70% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70%-87%; I2 = 89%) of 221 shoulders. Surgeries in acute cases had a lower prevalence of TW (52%) compared to chronic cases (71%) (P < .001). Significant TW was found in the central tunnel (3.2 mm; 95% CI: 1.8-4.6 mm; P < .001; I2 = 72%) for acute injuries and in the medial (1.2 mm; 95% CI: 0.7-1.7 mm; P < .001; I2 = 77%) and lateral (1.5 mm; 95% CI: 0.7-2.3 mm; P < .001; I2 = 77%) tunnels for chronic cases. Single central-tunnel techniques were positively associated with the prevalence of TW (P = .046), while biotenodesis screw fixation was associated with a lower prevalence (P = .004) in chronic cases. Reconstruction of the ACJ ligament complex with tendon grafts or sutures was associated with a higher prevalence of TW (P < .001). Drill sizes between 2.5 and 5 mm were significantly associated with a lower prevalence of TW, regardless of injury chronicity (P = .012). No correlation was found between TW and the loss of ACJ reduction or clavicle fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis explored TW occurrence following coracoclavicular stabilization surgery. TW was observed in 70% of patients at final follow-up, with a higher prevalence in chronic than in acute cases. Modifiable surgical variables, such as single-tunnel tendon graft constructs for acute or chronic injuries and knotted graft procedures for chronic injuries, were significantly associated with TW. Furthermore, the prevalence of TW increased with concomitant surgical treatment of the ACJ ligament complex, and decreased with drill sizes between 2.5 and 5 mm, regardless of lesion chronicity. These surgical variables should be considered when establishing transosseous tunnels for coracoclavicular stabilization. Clavicle fractures and TW mechanisms require further investigation.

The importance of a structured failure analysis in revision acromioclavicular joint surgery: A multi-rater agreement on the causes of stabilization failure from the ISAKOS shoulder committee

BACKGROUND

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) stabilizations are associated with a high overall failure rate with 9.5% of these patients requiring subsequent revision surgery. Consequently, understanding the specific cause of primary ACJ stabilization failure is paramount to improving surgical decision-making in this challenging patient cohort.

PURPOSE

To (1) identify risk factors and mechanisms for failure following primary arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization to highlight the importance of conducting a detailed failure analysis and to (2) establish revision strategies based on real-life cases of primary failed ACJ stabilization.

STUDY DESIGN

Level of evidence IV.

METHODS

A survey was shared internationally among members of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) shoulder committee. The survey contained failure analysis of 11 real-life cases of failed primary arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization. For each case, a thorough patient history, standardized radiographs, and CT scans were provided. Participants were asked to give their opinion on bone tunnel placement, cause of failure (biological, technical, traumatic, or combined), the stabilization technique used, as well as give a recommendation for revision.

RESULTS

Seventeen members of the ISAKOS shoulder committee completed the survey. Biological failure was considered the most common cause of failure (47.1%), followed by technical (35.3%) and traumatic (17.6%) failure. The majority deemed two modifiable factors (i.e., patient's profession and sport) as well as non-modifiable factors (i.e., patient's age and time from trauma to initial surgery) to be risk factors for failure. In 10 of 11 cases, the correct fixation device was used in the primary setting (90.9%; 52.8-82.4% agreement); however, in eight of those cases, the technique was not performed correctly (80.0%; 58.8-100% agreement). In 8 of all 11 cases, the majority recommended an arthroscopically assisted technique with graft augmentation for revision (52.9-58.8% agreement).

CONCLUSION

Biological failure and technical failure are the most common reason for failure in primary ACJ stabilization followed by traumatic failure. Besides, biological failure can be triggered by technical errors such as clavicular or coracoidal tunnel misplacement. Consequently, a detailed failure analysis including preoperative CT should be conducted on the causes of primary ACJ failure, and, if possible, an arthroscopically-assisted technique with graft augmentation should be prioritized in revision ACJ surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

ACJ stabilizations are associated with a high overall failure rate - potentially due to biological and technical properties. When encountering failed arthroscopically-assisted ACJ stabilization, a detailed failure analysis should be conducted on the causes of primary ACJ failure. Furthermore, an arthroscopically-assisted revision stabilization is feasible in most cases.

Clavicular Tunnel Widening After Acromioclavicular Stabilization Shows Implant-Dependent Correlation With Postoperative Loss of Reduction

PURPOSE

To radiographically describe, quantify, and compare clavicular tunnel widening (cTW) of 2 different types of stabilization devices and investigate a possible correlation between cTW and loss of reduction.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis of single-center registry data, we compared patients who were treated for an acute AC dislocation (Rockwood types III to V) with either the AC Dog Bone (DB) or low-profile AC (LP) repair systems. On 6-week and 6-month postoperative radiographs, we measured clavicle height and tunnel diameter. We calculated the button/clavicle filling (B/C) ratio to quantify how much of the clavicular tunnel height is covered by the low-profile inlet. The association between B/C ratio and the extent of cTW was defined, and we also compared cTW between treatment groups. Reduction of the AC joint was graded as either stable, partially dislocated or dislocated depending on the AC ratio. A 2-sample t-test was used for comparing cTW progression between the 2 groups. For continuous variables between more than 2 groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used.

RESULTS

Of 65 eligible patients, there were 37 and 28 included in the DB and LP groups, respectively. Overall, cTW was conically shaped with transclavicular widening noted in the DB group and cTW developing strictly inferior to the button in the LP group. For both implants, mean maximal cTW was 7.1 mm and located at the inferior cortex; the B/C ratio was not associated with increased inferior cTW (r = -0.23, P = .248). Only LP patients with complete loss of reduction had significantly increased cTW (P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

Conical-shaped cTW is a common implant-independent phenomenon after AC stabilization using suture-button devices. It occurs only at the suture-bone interface and is less excessive for the LP implant. There is an association between increased cTW and loss of reduction specific to the LP implant only.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

No correlation exists between coracoid tunnel widening and loss of reduction after arthroscopic acromioclavicular fixation using tightrope system

PURPOSE

To detect the widening of the tunnel of the coracoid process after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation using the TightRope system and its correlation with loss of reduction and functional scores.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2018, a prospective study was performed on twenty-three patients with acute grade III-V ACJ dislocation. Arthroscopic TightRope repair of the ACJ was performed. Coracoid tunnel widening was measured by CT, and the coracoclavicular distance was measured on the radiographs immediately postoperatively and at 12 months. The Constant Shoulder Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, Nottingham Clavicle Score and Visual analog scale were used as outcome measures at 12 months.

RESULTS

The coracoid tunnel diameter to horizontal coracoid diameter ratio increased from 22.8 ± 3.7% immediately postoperatively to 38.5 ± 5.5% at 12 months (p < 0.001). The coracoclavicular (CC) distance showed an increase from a mean of 10.8 ± 1.7 mm to a mean of 11.8 ± 2.5 at 12 months (p < 0.001). There was no correlation between the increase in the coracoclavicular distance and the patients' functional clinical scores or coracoid tunnel widening.

CONCLUSION

Coracoid tunnel widening and radiological loss of reduction occur after arthroscopic fixation of acute ACJ dislocation with the TightRope system. However, they do not correlate with each other or with the functional scores of the patient.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Implant-dependent behavior of tunnel widening and clavicular button migration after arthroscopic-assisted treatment of acromioclavicular joint instabilities

INTRODUCTION

Despite ongoing discussions for the previous few decades, there is still no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique for acromioclavicular joint instabilities. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of various implant materials following arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acromioclavicular joint instabilities on tunnel widening and implant migration. We hypothesized an implant-dependent behavior for tunnel widening and implant migration with differences when comparing acute and chronic acromioclavicular joint instabilities.

METHODS

This study compared 105 patients with acromioclavicular joint instabilities that were managed operatively with coracoclavicular double button constructs. Two of the groups containing acute cases were treated with either a double button construct with a wire (TR) or a tape (D) as a central pillar. The two groups with chronic cases were either treated with a wire (T+) or tape D+ as a central pillar and additional hamstring tendon augmentation (+). One central transclavicular-transcoracoidal drill channel was made in the acute cases, while additional medial and lateral drill channels to augment the central pillar with the hamstring tendon were made. The central drill channel in all cases and the medial/lateral drill channels in chronic cases were subsequently radiologically analyzed immediately postoperatively and at follow-up. Following this, additional radiological analysis of the implant migration of the clavicular button took place.

RESULTS

All groups showed significant tunnel widening of the central drill channel at follow-up (p ≤ 0.001). The TR+ technique demonstrated significant widening in both the medial (p ≤ 0.001) and lateral (p ≤ 0.001) drill channels. The D and D+ group displayed significant higher rates of clavicular button migration to a cortical and intraosseous level (p ≤ 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Tunnel widening and implant migration following arthroscopically assisted management of acromioclavicular joint instabilities are dependent on the chosen implant. The stable tape showed a significantly increased degree of tunnel widening with respect to the central drill channel in comparison with the wire. In contrast, a higher degree of load capacity of the tape ultimately favors a protected intraosseous graft healing for chronic cases, which leads to less tunnel widening of the medial and lateral drill channel. Finally, the D/D+ implant groups showed higher rates of implant migration due to lower contact surface area of the implant at the upper clavicular cortex.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Acromioclavicular joint suture button repair leads to coracoclavicular tunnel widening

PURPOSE

Biomechanical evaluation of three different suture button devices used in acromioclavicular joint repair and analysis of their effect on post-testing tunnel widening.

METHODS

Eighteen human shoulder girdles were assigned into three groups with a similar mean bone mineral density. Three different single-tunnel acromioclavicular repair devices were tested: (1) AC TightRope^® with FiberWire; (2) AC Dog Bone^™ Button with FiberTape; (3) Low Profile AC Repair System. Biomechanical testing was performed simulating the complex movement of the distal clavicle as follows. A vertical load of 80 N was applied continuously. The rotation of the clavicle about its long axis was set at 10° anterior and 30° posterior for 2500 cycles at 0.25 Hz. The horizontal translation of the clavicle was set at 6 mm medial and 6 mm lateral for 10,000 cycles at 1 Hz. The coracoclavicular distance was measured before and after testing. After testing, each sample underwent micro-CT analysis. Following 3D reconstruction, the area of the bone tunnels was measured at five defined cross sections.

RESULTS

In TightRope^® and Dog Bone^™ groups, all samples completed testing, whereas in the Low Profile group, three out of six samples showed system failure. The mean absolute difference of coracoclavicular distance after testing was significantly greater in the Low Profile group compared to TightRope^® and Dog Bone^™ groups (4.3 ± 1.3 mm vs 1.9 ± 0.7 mm vs 1.9 ± 0.8 mm; p = 0.001). Micro-CT analysis of the specimens demonstrated significant tunnel widening in the inferior clavicular and superior coracoid regions in all three groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Significant tunnel widening can be observed for all devices and is primarily found in the inferior parts of the clavicle and superior parts of the coracoid. The Low Profile AC Repair System showed inferior biomechanical properties compared to the AC TightRope^® and AC Dog Bone^™ devices. Therefore, clinicians should carefully select the type of acromioclavicular repair device used and need to consider tunnel widening as a complication.

Superior clinical results for early arthroscopic treatment of grade IIIb and V acromioclavicular joint instability compared to delayed operative treatment

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopy-assisted cortical fixation devices have been increasingly used in the operative management of both acute and chronic cases of acromioclavicular joint instability (ACJI). It has been hypothesized that delayed surgical management leads to inferior clinical and radiologic outcomes compared to acute treatment. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical and radiologic outcomes, scapula dyskinesia, and failure or revision rates of arthroscopically treated acute and chronic ACJI.

METHODS

This retrospective study of prospectively collected data included all surgically treated patients with grade IIIb and V chronic ACJI between 2013 and 2017, matched 1:1 to a group of acute grade IIIb and V ACJI patients treated during the same time period. Chronic ACJI was defined as delayed surgical treatment >21 days after injury. Chronic cases received an additional hamstring autograft next to the suture pulley systems. Follow-up was obtained at an average of 3.2 years (range: 1.4-6.2). Clinical outcome scores included the Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Taft Score (TF), Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS), ACJI Score, Sick Scapula Score (SSS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Subjective Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, and the visual analog scale pain score. Radiologic follow-up was obtained pre- and postoperatively and at final follow-up. The 2-year results were compared to the results of a 1:1 matched-pair group comprising patients who were treated with an acute ACJI during the same period.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (80.5%) of 41 chronic ACJI cases were available for follow-up and were compared with 33 matched-pair cases of acute ACJI (of 41). The clinical scores were significantly better in the acute cohort for the CMS (92 ± 8 vs. 88 ± 8, P = .030), ASES (91 ± 13 vs. 85 ± 13, P = .002), SSS (1.4 ± 1.6 vs. 3.4 ± 2.5, P = .0004), NCS (86 ± 13 vs. 81 ± 13, P = .049), TF (9.9 ± 1.9 vs. 9.0 ± 2.1, P = .030), and ACJI (83 ± 13 vs. 75 ± 1, P = .003). In contrast to the chronic cohort, the acute cohort illustrated a significant loss of reduction at follow-up (P = .020).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, early arthroscopy-assisted operative treatment of grade IIIb and V ACJIs seems superior to delayed surgical intervention of grade IIIb and V ACJIs. Furthermore, an additional autograft loop leads to less loss of reduction compared with suture pulley/suspensory loop fixation standalones.

A modified single-endobutton technique combined with nice knot for treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation

PURPOSE

Double-endobutton technique, as a widely accepted strategy for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation, is undergoing constant improvement. This study aims to assess the clinical effect of a modified single-endobutton combined with the nice knot in the fixation of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

METHODS

From January 2016 to June 2019, 16 adult patients (13 males and 3 females) with Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with a modified single-endobutton technique combined with the nice knot in our department. The age ranged from 18 to 64 years old with an average of 32.8 years old. Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, post-operative clinical outcomes and radiographic results were recorded and analyzed. Preoperative and last follow-up scores in the Constant-Murley Scale, Neer score, Rating Scale of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and VAS scale and complications such as infection, re-dislocation, implant loosening, medical origin fracture and hardware pain were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients were followed up for 6 to 18 months with an average of 10.3 months. The operative time was 50-90 min with an average of (62.5 ± 3.10) min. The intraoperative blood loss was 30-100 ml, with an average of (55.0 ± 4.28) ml. The complications, such as wound infection, internal fixation failure and fractures, were not found in these cases. According to Karlsson criteria, there were excellent in 14 cases, good in 2 cases at the final follow-up. The mean VAS score of the patients was 5.88 ± 0.26 preoperatively, compared with 0.19 ± 0.14 at the final follow-up evaluation. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The mean Constant score was 45.5 ± 2.0 preoperatively, compared to 94.0 ± 0.73 at the final follow-up evaluation. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Patients had statistically significant preoperative and postoperative AC (acromioclavicular distance) and CC (coracoclavicular distance) distances (P < 0.05); 6 months postoperatively the AC(P = 0.412) and CC(P = 0.324) distances were not statistically significant compared to the healthy side.

CONCLUSION

Nice knot provides a reliable fixation for the single-endobutton technique in the treatment of acromioclavicular dislocations. The modified single-endobutton technique combined with the nice knot can achieve good clinical outcomes in the treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Clavicular Tunnel Complications after Coracoclavicular Reconstruction in Acute Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Coracoid Loop versus Coracoid Tunnel Fixation

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare clavicular tunnel complications after coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction between a coracoid loop fixation group and a coracoid tunnel fixation group. We hypothesized that clavicular tunnel complications would be more common in the coracoid loop group.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated 24 patients who underwent CC reconstruction using coracoid tunnel fixation (n = 14) and coracoid loop fixation (n = 10). Radiographic measurements included the CC distance and clavicular tunnel diameter. Clavicular tunnel complications such as tunnel widening and clavicular tunnel fractures were investigated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score and the University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder score.

Results

The mean follow-up period was 17.5 months (range, 11–38 months). The final clavicular tunnel diameter and the increase in the clavicular tunnel diameter in millimeter and percentage were significantly greater in the coracoid loop group than in the coracoid tunnel group (all p < 0.05). Clavicular tunnel widening more than 100% was found in 5 patients, all belonging to the coracoid loop group. Clavicular tunnel fractures occurred in 3 patients (all in the coracoid loop group). Fracture was associated with severe tunnel widening (more than 100% increase). The mean value of the final clavicular tunnel diameter in patients with fractures was significantly larger than that in patients without (12.7 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.4 ± 1.5 mm, p = 0.016).

Conclusions

Clavicular tunnel complications such as significant tunnel widening and fractures after CC reconstructions in acromioclavicular dislocations were common with the coracoid loop fixation technique. A greater clavicular tunnel widening and resultantly enlarged tunnel diameter might increase the risk of fracture through the clavicular tunnel.

Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system

PURPOSE

To evaluate immediate loss of reduction in patients undergoing hardware removal after arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization using a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system and to identify risk factors associated with immediate loss of reduction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-two consecutive patients with a mean age of 36.4 ± 12.6 years (19-56), who underwent hardware removal 18.2 ± 15.0 months following arthroscopically assisted stabilization surgery using a suspensory fixation system for AC joint injury between 01/2012 and 01/2021 were enrolled in this retrospective monocentric study. The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) as well as the clavicular dislocation/acromial thickness (D/A) ratio were measured on anterior-posterior radiographs prior to hardware removal and immediately postoperatively by two independent raters. Loss of reduction, defined as 10% increase in the CCD, was deemed substantial if the CCD increased 6 mm compared to preoperatively. Constitutional and surgical characteristics were assessed in a subgroup analysis to detect risk factors associated with loss of reduction.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the CCD significantly increased from 12.6 ± 3.7 mm (4.8-19.0) to 14.5 ± 3.3 mm (8.7-20.6 mm) (p < 0.001) while the D/A ratio increased from 0.4 ± 0.3 (- 0.4-0.9) to 0.6 ± 0.3 (1.1-0.1) (p = 0.034) compared to preoperatively. In 10 cases (45%), loss of reduction was identified, while a substantial loss of reduction (> 6 mm) was only observed in one patient (4.5%). A shorter time interval between index stabilization surgery and hardware removal significantly corresponded to immediate loss of reduction (11.0 ± 5.6 vs. 30.0 ± 20.8 months; p = 0.007), as hardware removal within one year following index stabilization was significantly associated with immediate loss of reduction (p = 0.027; relative risk 3.4; odds ratio 11.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial loss of reduction after hardware removal of a high-tensile suture tape suspensory fixation system was rare, indicating that the postoperative result of AC stabilization is not categorically at risk when performing this procedure. Even though radiological assessment of the patients showed a statistically significant immediate superior clavicular displacement after this rarely required procedure, with an increased incidence in the first year following stabilization, this may not negatively influence the results of ACJ stabilization in a clinically relevant way.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Impact of Gastropexy/Omentopexy on Gastrointestinal Symptoms after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become a single-step operation for the management of severe obesity. A statistically significant number of participants who undergo this procedure experience nausea, vomiting, and reflux symptoms early after the operation. The objectives of this study were to measure the positive or negative effect of gastropexy on reducing distressing postoperative LSG-related gastrointestinal symptoms.

Patients and Methods

This was a comparative randomized study conducted from January 2018 to January 2021. The study was carried out in the general surgery department at Menoufia University Hospital, Menoufia Faculty of Medicine in Egypt. Two hundred participants were included randomly during this trial. The participants were divided into two groups, with 100 patients in each group. Patients in group A underwent gastropexy, and patients in group B underwent LSG without gastropexy.

Results

There was no significant difference between the groups in age or sex (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (p > 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups regarding nausea, vomiting, reflux symptoms, and the amount and frequency of antiemetics used (p < 0.001). There was also a significant difference in hospital readmissions (p < 0.05) and in clinic visits during the postoperative period.

Conclusions

Patients who underwent gastropexy showed a significant reduction in antiemetic consumption and a significantly lower incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms and gastric torsion than those who did not undergo gastropexy.

Graphical abstract

Arthroscopic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction Combined with Open Acromioclavicular Reconstruction Using Knot Hiding Clavicular Implants Is a Stable Solution

Purpose

The purpose of this noninterventional, register-based study was to report the outcomes and wound healing of surgically treated chronic acromioclavicular (AC) dislocations using a tendon graft and knot-hiding titanium implants.

Methods

Thirty-two cases with chronic AC separation underwent an arthroscopic coracoclavicular (CC) ligament reconstruction and an open AC ligament reconstruction using knot-hiding titanium implants. The wound healing was assessed 2 months after the operation. The Nottingham Clavicle score, Constant score, and Simple Shoulder Test were obtained postoperatively and at a minimum of one-year postsurgery. The radiographic change in distance between the clavicular and coracoid cortices and clavicular tunnel diameter was measured. General patient satisfaction with the outcome (poor, fair, good, or excellent) was also assessed 1 year postoperatively.

Results

The mean Nottingham Clavicle score increased from a preoperative mean of 41.66 ± 9.86 to 96.831 ± 5.86 (P ≤ .05). The Constant score increased from a preoperative mean of 44.66 ± 12.54 to 93.59 ± 7.01 (P ≤ .05). The Simple Shoulder Test score increased from a preoperative mean of 7.00 ± 2.14 to 11.84 ± .63 (P ≤ .05). The coracoclavicular distance increased from 11.32 ± 3.71 to 13.48 ± 3.79 mm (P ≤ .05). The clavicular drill hole diameter increased from 6 mm to a mean of 6 to a mean of 8.13 ± 1.12 mm. Twenty-three (71.9%) patients reported an excellent outcome, and nine (28.1%) reported a good outcome. One clavicular fracture occurred but no coracoid fractures. There was one reconstruction failure leading to a reoperation.

Conclusions

In this series, combining the arthroscopic CC ligament reconstruction to an open reconstruction of the AC joint with a tendon graft proved to be a stable solution. The knot-hiding titanium implant effectively eliminated the problems related to the clavicular wound healing.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Radiographic alterations in clavicular bone tunnel width following anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) for chronic acromioclavicular joint injuries

PURPOSE

To evaluate tunnel widening and its relationship in loss of reduction and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) using free tendon grafts for chronic acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on patients undergoing ACCR for type III-VI AC joint injuries between January 2003 and December 2017. For radiographic analysis, pre- and post-operative coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and tunnel width of the medial and lateral clavicular bone tunnel were measured at the earliest (EPO) and latest postoperative follow-up (LPO). To determine the clinical relevance of improvement in clinical outcome score (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) thresholds were used.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with a mean clinical follow-up of 37 ± 35 months (mean age 44.7 ± 13.4) were included in the study. Both the medial (5.6 ± 0.2 mm_EPO-6.6 ± 0.7 mm_LPO; p < 0.001) and lateral (5.6 ± 0.5 mm_EPO-6.8 ± 1 mm_LPO; p < 0.001) clavicular bone tunnel showed significant widening from EPO to LPO. There was a significant loss of reduction at LPO (CCD_LPO 10.1 ± 4 mm) compared to EPO (CCD_EPO: 6.2 ± 3.8 mm) (p < 0.001). No significant correlation between loss of reduction and medial (p = 0.45; r = - 0.06) or lateral (p = 0.69; r = - 0.06) tunnel widening was found. Alterations in tunnel width were shown having no influence on clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent ACCR using a free tendon graft for the treatment of chronic type III-VI ACJ injuries showed significant clavicular bone tunnel widening during the postoperative course. No correlation between tunnel widening and loss of reduction was shown with radiographic findings having no influence on clinical benefit and satisfaction.

STUDY DESIGN

Case Series; Level of evidence, IV.

The Kite technique: a new all-arthroscopic technique for the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

PURPOSE

Although many open techniques have been developed, no all-arthroscopic technique has been introduced to reduce acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACJD) and augment both coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments. The Kite technique is the first all arthroscopic technique with this aim.

METHODS

Forty-one consecutive patients [35M-6F; median: 29.2 years (range 23-36)] with acute type III and V acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with the Kite technique: it consists of positioning three titanium buttons connected by heavy sutures in an 8-strand configuration between clavicle and coracoid to restore the anatomy of CC ligaments. Patients were followed up for a median of 35 months (range 30-43 months).

RESULTS

Median operation time was 70.6 min (range 58-82), with no cases of intra-operative complications. At the final follow-up, the median post-operative Constant Score and SST were 94.1 (range 89-98) and 11.6 (range 10-12), respectively. At the final follow-up reduction maintenance was present in 39 patients; in one patient, signs of acromioclavicular joint dislocation recurrence were present 3 months post-op. In another patient, medial suture ruptures occurred 4 months after surgery with type II acromioclavicular joint dislocation recurrence but with scarce symptoms and full recovery to sport activity. Clavicle osteolysis was observed in four patients. Cosmetics of the arm were judged as excellent in 39/41. All patients, except two, were satisfied with the final result.

CONCLUSIONS

The kite technique is a safe and reproducible arthroscopic procedure to treat acute ACJD. In daily clinical practice, due to the excellent results and the low complication rate, this technique might be considered by surgeons when operative treatment of an acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation is planned.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Minimum 10-Year Outcomes After Revision Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability

Background:

Revision surgery in cases of previously failed primary acromioclavicular (AC) joint stabilization remains challenging mainly because of anatomic alterations or technical difficulties. However, anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) has been shown to achieve encouraging biomechanical, clinical, and radiographic short-term to midterm results.

Purpose:

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic long-term outcomes of patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries with a minimum 10-year follow-up.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review was performed on prospectively collected data within an institutional shoulder registry. Patients who underwent revision ACCR for type III through V AC joint injuries between January 2003 and December 2009 were analyzed. Clinical outcome measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). The coracoclavicular distance (CCD) was measured for radiographic analysis immediately postoperatively and at last postoperative follow-up.

Results:

A total of 8 patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 44.6 ± 10.6 years and a mean follow-up of 135.0 ± 17.4 months (range, 120-167 months) were eligible for inclusion in the study. The time from initial AC joint stabilization until revision surgery was 10.2 ± 12.4 months (range, 0.5-36 months); 62.5% of the patients had undergone more than 2 previous AC joint surgical procedures. The ASES score improved from 43.9 ± 22.4 preoperatively to 80.6 ± 28.8 postoperatively (P = .012), the SST score improved from 4.4 ± 3.6 preoperatively to 11.0 ± 2.2 postoperatively (P = .017), and the SANE score improved from 31.4 ± 27.3 preoperatively to 86.9 ± 24.1 postoperatively (P = .018) at final follow-up. There was no significant difference in the CCD (P = .08) between the first (7.6 ± 3.0 mm) and final (10.6 ± 2.8 mm) radiographic follow-up (mean, 50.5 ± 32.7 months [range, 18-98 months]).

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing revision ACCR after failed operative treatment for type III through V AC joint injuries maintained significant improvement in clinical outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up.

The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of reduction loss of more than 3 mm on clinical and radiological results after at least 2 years of follow-up after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations using a double-button device.

Methods

Thirty-six patients who had acute (< 3 weeks old), type III or V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations underwent arthroscopic fixation of the AC joint using a double-button device. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed at preoperative, postoperative first day, 3 months and last follow-up. When the coracoclavicular (CC) distances of patients at the last follow-up were compared to the early postop CC distances, those with a difference of 3 mm or less were grouped as group A and those with a difference of more than 3 mm were grouped as group B.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, gender, follow-up time, time from injury to surgery, return to work, and distribution of Rockwood classification. Pre-operative CC distance was reduced from 18.7 ± 3.5 to 8.5 ± 0.6 in the early postoperative period. Anatomic reduction was achieved in all patients compared with the unaffected side (CC distance 8.6 ± 0.7). However, the CC distance increased to 9.9 ± 1.5 at the third-month follow-up and increased to 11 ± 2.7 at the last follow-up. There were no significant Constant score differences between the groups in the preoperative and last follow-up periods (p > 0.05). At the last follow-up, the mean Acromioclavicular Joint Instability (ACJI) score of group A was 84.4 ± 8, whereas it was 68.3 ± 8.3 for group B, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the subjective evaluation and aesthetic subjective satisfaction values of group B were lower than group A (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Reduction loss of more than 3 mm was observed in 25% of patients after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device. Although this loss did not create a statistically significant difference in Constant scores, AC joint-specific tests such as ACJI, subjective evaluation, and aesthetic subjective satisfaction values were significantly impaired.