A pre-operative grade 3 J-sign adversely affects short-term clinical outcome and is more likely to yield MPFL residual graft laxity in recurrent patellar dislocation

Patello-femoral arthroplasty- indications and contraindications

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is emerging as an attractive alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for isolated patellofemoral-osteoarthritis (PF-OA) for selected patients. The success of PFA is highly dependent on patient selection. This intervention is still burdened with a higher rate of revisions and a lower survival rate than TKA when the indications or the surgical technique are not optimal. We highlight the indications and contraindications of PFA to obtain satisfying functional outcomes and survivorship. Preoperative clinical and radiological assessment is critical to determine the presence of PFA indications, the absence of contraindications and the necessity of any associated procedures, particularly for the tibial tubercle. The typical indications are patients with isolated symptomatic PF-OA, with trochlear dysplasia, when bone-on-bone Iwano 4 osteoarthritis is observed, without significant malalignment and with the absence of risk factors for developing progressive tibiofemoral-OA. The three main causes of isolated PF-OA are primary OA, trochlear dysplasia and posttraumatic OA following patellar fracture. Trochlear dysplasia is the preferred indication for PFA. Lack of experience with arthroplasty or realignment of the extensor mechanism is a relative contraindication to performing PFA.

Promising results following derotational femoral osteotomy in patellofemoral instability with increased femoral anteversion: A systematic review on current indications, outcomes and complication rate

Purpose

Patellofemoral joint instability (PFJI) can surgically be treated with a multitude of approaches, depending on the underlying pathology. In the presence of increased femoral anteversion, some authors have reported good results with a derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DeDFO). The purpose of the study was to investigate the indications, outcomes and complication rate of DeDFO for PFJI.

Methods

A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) by searching Medline, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases through 1 December 2023. Included were levels 1-4 clinical studies of skeletally mature patients undergoing a DeDFO for PFJI irrespective of concomitant procedures. Study characteristics, indications, radiological and clinical outcomes, surgical technique and concomitant procedures, re-dislocation and complication rate were all analysed, as was methodological quality.

Results

A total of 12 studies including 310 patients (325 knees) were included. Three studies were cohort studies, all others were case series. The mean patient age across the studies was 22 years, and the mean follow-up was 29.4 months. Femoral anteversion cut-off was between 20° and 30°. Every study included at least one concurrent soft tissue, bony or combined procedure. Across all studies, one case of re-dislocation was reported (0.3%) and four implant or osteotomy-related complications (1.2%) were reported. All studies reported a statistically significant increase in clinical scores.

Conclusion

This systematic review of DeDFO for patellofemoral instability in the presence of increased femoral anteversion demonstrates promising clinical results and an extremely low dislocation and complication rate. The heterogeneity of the cut-off in anteversion and concomitant procedures, especially tibial tubercle osteotomy with seemingly identical results, indicates the need for high-quality evidence for treating patellofemoral instability. Based upon this systematic review, we strongly recommend that DeDFO be added to the 'menu à la carte' of PFJI.

Level of Evidence

Level III Systematic Review.

Preoperative subjective assessment of disease-specific quality of life significantly influenced the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after surgical stabilization for recurrent lateral patellar instability

PURPOSE

To evaluate which factors exert a predictive value for not reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patients who underwent a tailored operative treatment for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (RLPD).

METHODS

A total of 237 patients (male/female 71/166; 22.4 ± 6.8 years) were included. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and subjective rating of knee function and pain (numeric analogue scale [NAS]; 0-10) were used to evaluate patients' outcomes from pre- to postoperatively. Gender, age at the time of surgery, body mass index (BMI), nicotine abuse, psychiatric diseases, cartilage status and pathoanatomic risk factors were evaluated as potential predictors for achieving the MCID using univariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The MCID for the BPII 2.0 was calculated at 9.5 points. Although the BPII 2.0 and NAS for knee function and pain improved significantly in the total cohort from pre- to postoperatively (all p < 0.001), 29 patients did not reach the MCID at the final follow-up. The analysis yielded that only the preoperative NAS for function and BPII 2.0 score values were significant predictors for reaching the MCID postoperatively. The optimal threshold was calculated at 7 (NAS function) and 65.2 points (BPII 2.0). Age at the time of surgery should be considered for patients with a preoperative BPII 2.0 score >62.5.

CONCLUSION

The probability of reaching BPII 2.0 MCID postoperatively depends only on the preoperative BPII 2.0 value and subjective rating of knee function, as well as age at the time of surgery for patients undergoing surgical treatment of RLPD. Here, presented results can assist clinicians in advising and presenting patients with potential outcomes following treatment for this often complex and multifactorial pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Derotational distal femur osteotomy with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction can get good outcomes in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation with excessive TT-TG and increased femoral anteversion

Background

Surgery is the main treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation (PD). However, due to the complexity of anatomical factors, there is still a lack of consensus on the choice of combined surgical methods. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with derotational distal femur osteotomies (MPFLR + DDFO) and combined with tibial tubercle osteotomies (MPFLR + TTO) for recurrent PD with increased femoral anteversion angles (FAA) and excessive tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis, MPFLR + DDFO and MPFLR + TTO patients from 2015 to 2020 were included. Group A (MPFLR + DDFO, n = 42) and B (MPFLR + TTO, n = 46) were formed. Clinical outcomes included physical examinations, functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), visual analog scale (VAS) and intermittent and persistent osteoarthritis pain scale (ICOAP), Tegner scores), and complications. The Caton-Deschamps index (CD-I), patellar title angle, patellar congruence angle, patella-trochlear groove distance, TT-TG distance, and FAA were used to assess radiological outcomes.

Results

All clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but Group A had significantly better postoperative scores than Group B (Kujala: 89.8 ± 6.4 vs. 82.9 ± 7.4, P < 0.01; Lysholm: 90.9 ± 5.1 vs. 81.3 ± 6.3, P = 0.02; IKDC: 87.3 ± 9.0 vs. 82.7 ± 8.0, P < 0.01; Tegner: 6.0 (5.0, 9.0) vs. 5.0 (4.0, 8.0), P = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the VAS and ICOAP scores between the two groups. No dislocation recurrences occurred. Radiological outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but Group A had better outcomes. After surgery, the patellar height of 88.5% (23/26) patients in Group A and 82.8% (24/29) patients in Group B was restored to normal (the Caton-Deschamps index <1.2).

Conclusions

Both MPFLR + TTO and MPFLR + DDFO obtained satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of recurrent PD with increased FAA and excessive TT-TG. However, the outcomes of MPFLR + DDFO were better and should be considered a priority. MPFLR + TTO may be not necessary for such patients.

Patellar tilt, congruence angle, and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance are correlated with positive J-sign in adolescents

PURPOSE

The J-sign is a clinical evaluation tool that assesses for patellar maltracking and is considered positive if lateral translation of the patella in extension, in the pattern of an inverted J is observed. This study aims to determine the association of clinical J-sign with imaging features noted on dynamic kinematic computed tomography (DKCT).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted by reviewing the clinical records of all patients aged 18 years or younger who had a CT patellar tracking scan done between 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2016 in a single institution. Patients who had the presence or absence of a 'J-sign' evaluated clinically were included. Radiographic parameters evaluated using the axial cuts include the patellar tilt angle, congruence angle, Dejour's classification, femoral sulcus angle, trochlear groove depth, and Wiberg's classification. Patients were then divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of J-sign on clinical examination. The radiographic measurements were then analyzed for association with the presence or absence of J-sign on clinical examination.

RESULTS

Patients with a positive J-sign had an increased patellar tilt of 23.3° ± 14.2° and an increased congruence angle of 47.1° ± 28.5° when measured in extension as compared to a patellar tilt of 18.3° ± 10.8° and a congruence angle of 32.1° ± 20.8° in patients with a negative J-sign (p = 0.024 and 0.004, respectively). Comparisons of the change in congruence angles with the knee in full extension and at 20° flexion also yielded significantly higher change of 28.0° ± 20.4° in patients with a positive J-sign as compared to 11.9° ± 17.5° in patients with a negative J-sign. Patients with a positive J-sign also had an increased TT-TG distance of 17.6 ± 5.6 mm as compared to a TT-TG distance of 14.7 ± 6.9 mm in patients with a negative J-sign (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Patients with a positive J-sign had an increased patellar tilt and an increased congruence angle when measured in extension. Increased TT-TG distance was also significantly associated with positive J-sign. Patients with a positive J-sign also had a greater change in their congruence angle when measured with the knee in full extension and at 20° of flexion.

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy improves subjective function and patellar tracking after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation patients with increased femoral anteversion: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to systematically review and quantitatively analyse the clinical outcomes of combined derotational distal femoral osteotomy (D-DFO) and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) with increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA).

METHODS

This study was performed in line with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) and AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality Of Systematic Reviews) Guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of combined D-DFO and MPFL-R in RPD patients with increased FAA. Data on patient-reported outcome measures, radiological parameters, patellar tracking as revealed by J-sign and complications were extracted based on the inclusion criteria. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Study score was used for quality assessment. Review Manager and R statistical software were used to perform the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Eleven studies with a total of 569 knees in 553 patients were included. Patients were predominantly female (79%). The weighted mean of FAA decreased from 33.6° to 13.0° (weighted mean difference = 20.59; p < 0.00001) after the combined procedure. Significant improvements (p < 0.00001) were identified in the Lysholm score (weighted mean: 55.5 vs. 80.4), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (weighted mean: 52.8 vs. 78.6) and Kujala score (weighted mean: 54.5 vs. 80.6). The incidence of residual J-sign ranged from 14.3% to 38.3% with an overall pooled rate of 28.2% (95% confidence interval = 22.8%-33.6%). The overall redislocation rate was 1.1%. No patients experienced surgical site infection or bone nonunion. Two studies compared the clinical outcomes of MPFL-R with and without D-DFO. Compared with isolated MPFL-R, the combined procedure yielded a better Lysholm score (weighted mean: 84.9 vs. 79.3, p < 0.0001), IKDC score (weighted mean: 84.1 vs. 79.9, p = 0.001), Kujala score (weighted mean: 84.3 vs. 79.4, p < 0.0001) and a lower residual J-sign rate (26/97 [26.8%] vs. 44/105 [41.9%], p = 0.02), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of D-DFO and MPFL-R led to improved clinical outcomes and a low redislocation rate in patients with RPD and increased FAA. Additional D-DFO can achieve more favourable results in subjective function and patellar tracking than isolated MPFL-R in the setting of excessive FAA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Qualitative visual assessment of the J-sign demonstrates high inter-rater reliability

OBJECTIVES

To assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the classification of the J-sign as "large" versus "small or none" as compared to another two-level system ("present" versus "absent") and a three-level system ("large," "small," or "none") and to identify anatomical and patient factors associated with the presence of a large J-sign.

METHODS

Forty patients (40 knees) with recurrent patellar instability were prospectively enrolled and recorded on video actively extending their knee while seating. Four raters classified patellar tracking on two separate occasions using three systems: 1) two groups: J-sign versus no J-sign; 2) three groups: large J-sign, small J-sign, or no J-sign; and 3) two groups: large J-sign versus small or no J-sign. The intra- and inter-rater reliability of each system was assessed using kappa statistics. Anatomical (trochlear dysplasia, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patellar height) and patient (Beighton score) factors as well as Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales were compared between patients with a large J-sign and patients with a small or no J-sign.

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-rater reliability were found to be highest with the two-level classification system of a large J-sign versus a small or no J-sign (inter-rater kappa ​= ​0.76, intra-rater kappa ​= ​0.75). Patients with a large J-sign had more severe trochlear dysplasia as assessed with the sulcus angle (p ​= ​0.042) and were more likely to have a tight lateral retinaculum (p ​= ​0.032) and an elevated Beighton score (p ​= ​0.009). No significant differences in KOOS subscales were noted based on the presence of a large J-sign versus a small J-sign or no J-sign.

CONCLUSION

Qualitative visual assessment of patellar tracking with the J-sign demonstrates substantial inter- and intra-rater reliability, particularly when utilizing a two-group classification system to identify knees with a large J-sign. Patients with a large J-sign demonstrate an increased incidence of a tight lateral retinaculum, generalized ligamentous laxity, and trochlear dysplasia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III - cross-sectional study.

Analysis of lower extremity alignment (LEA) in children with recurrent patellar dislocation by EOS system

Objectives

Recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) greatly affects active young individuals, necessitating the identification of risk factors for a better understanding of its cause. Previous research has connected RPD to lower limb alignment (LEA) abnormalities, such as increased femoral anteversion, tibial external rotation, knee valgus, and flexion. This study aims to use EOS technology to detect RPD-related LEA anomalies, enabling three-dimensional assessment under load conditions.

Methods

A total of 100 limbs (50 in the RPD group, 50 in the control group) were retrospectively analyzed. In the RPD group, we included limbs with recurrent patellar dislocation, characterized by dislocations occurs at least two times, while healthy limbs served as the control group. We used EOS technology, including 2D and 3D imaging, to measure and compare the following parameters between the two groups in a standing position: Femoral neck shaft angle (NSA), Mechanical femoral tibial angle (MFTA), Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), Medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), Anatomical femoral anteversion (AFA), External tibial torsion (ETT), and Femorotibial rotation (FTR).

Results

The significant differences between the two groups were shown in NSA 3/2D, MFTA 3/2D, mLDFA 3/2D, MPTA 3D, AFA, FTR. No significant difference was shown in MPTA 2D, ETT between the RPD group and the control group. Further binary logistic regression analysis. Further binary logistic regression analysis was conducted on the risk factors affecting RPD mentioned above. and found four risk factors for binary logistic regression analysis: mLDFA (3D), AFA, NSA(3D), and FTR.

Conclusions

EOS imaging identified abnormal LEA parameters, including NSA, MFTA, mLDFA, MPTA, AFA, and FTR, as risk factors for RPD. Children with these risk factors should receive moderate knee joint protection.

Effect of Lower Extremity Torsion on Clinical Outcomes After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Tibial Tubercle Transfer for Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability

BACKGROUND

Increased femoral torsion (FT) or tibial torsion (TT) has been suggested to be a potential risk factor for recurrent patellofemoral instability. However, the influence of increased FT or TT on the postoperative clinical outcomes of recurrent patellofemoral instability has rarely been investigated.

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of increased FT or TT on postoperative results in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability after combined medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and tibial tubercle transfer, along with the influence of other risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Out of 91 patients, the study's analyses included 86 patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability who were treated with MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer and enrolled between April 2020 and January 2021. FT and TT were assessed using preoperative computed tomography images. According to the torsion value of FT or TT, patients were categorized into 3 groups for each of FT and TT: group A (<20°), group B (20°-30°), and group C (>30°). Patellar height, femoral trochlear dysplasia, and the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were also assessed. Patient-reported outcome scores (Tegner, Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], Lysholm, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Clinical failure of MPFLR was recorded. Subgroup analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of increased FT or TT on the postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 86 patients were enrolled with a median follow-up time of 25 months. At the final follow-up, all functional scores improved significantly. Patella alta, high-grade trochlear dysplasia, and increased TT-TG distance did not have any significant effect on the postoperative functional scores. Regarding FT, subgroup analysis indicated that all functional scores of group C were lower than those of groups A and B except the KOOS knee-related Quality of Life score. For TT, group C had lower scores than group A for all functional outcomes except Tegner and KOOS Quality of Life and lower scores than group B for Kujala, IKDC, KOOS (Symptoms and Sport and Recreation subscales), Tegner, and Lysholm scores. The comparison between group A and group B, whether for FT or TT, revealed no significant differences.

CONCLUSION

For patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability, increased lower extremity torsion (FT or TT >30°) was associated with inferior postoperative clinical outcomes after combined MPFLR and tibial tubercle transfer.

At 10-Year Minimum Follow-Up, One-Third of Patients Have Patellofemoral Arthritis After Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Using Gracilis Tendon Autograft

PURPOSE

To report the long-term clinical outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) to treat recurrent patellar instability.

METHODS

This was a single-center study of patients undergoing an isolated MPFLr between 2000 and 2011. All patients underwent reconstruction using hamstring autograft. The inclusion criteria were a minimum 10-year follow-up period and skeletally mature patients with more than 1 episode of patellar dislocation who underwent MPFLr without an associated bony procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 54 knees were available for final analysis. The mean follow-up period was 12.3 years (range, 10-14 year). The mean age at surgery was 25 years. No patients had patellofemoral arthritis (PFA) prior to surgery. Preoperatively, the mean Caton-Deschamps index was 1.1 and the mean tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance was 14.9 ± 2 mm (range, 7-17 mm). All patients had trochlear dysplasia according to the Dejour classification. At final follow-up, the mean Kujala score was 82.9 ± 15.3; mean International Knee Documentation Committee score, 78.3 ± 18.5; and mean Tegner score, 4.0 ± 1.7. Patients with an unsatisfactory outcome as determined by a Kujala score lower than 80 had a higher Caton-Deschamps index preoperatively and were more likely to be female patients; however, neither factor reached significance. Of the patients, 33 (66%) had no radiographic evidence of PFA whereas 15 (30%) had Iwano stage 1 and 2 had Iwano stage 2 (4%). At final follow-up, 4 patients (7.4%) had recurrent instability requiring revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated MPFLr with gracilis tendon autograft in appropriately selected patients is an effective long-term treatment for recurrent patellofemoral instability with low rates of recurrence. One-third of patients exhibit radiographic evidence of PFA more than 10 years after isolated MPFLr.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

What is the J-sign and why is it important?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability is a complex condition that requires a thorough evaluation to optimize treatment. The J-sign test is classically part of the physical examination, but its significance and importance remain unclear. This review aims to describe how to perform the test and classify the observation as well as to analyze the most recent literature on its clinical applications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The J-sign test has been described as positive (present) or negative (absent), and classified using the quadrant method and the Donnell classification. Suboptimal inter-rater reliability has been shown for both classifications, making comparison between clinicians and studies challenging. The J-sign is most predominantly associated with patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, lateral force vector, and rotational abnormalities. A growing number of studies have shown a correlation between a positive J-sign and lower clinical outcome scores and higher rate of surgical failure.

SUMMARY

The J-sign is an important aspect of the physical examination in patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability. Although there is no consensus on how to perform or classify the test, it can be used as a marker of severity of patellofemoral instability and is one of the tools available to guide the treatment plan.

When Should Bony Correction Be Considered in Addition to Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction? Results of a Clinically Derived 2-Group Classification of Lateral Patellar Instability Based on 122 Patients at 2- to 5-Year Follow-up

Background

The need for concomitant bony procedures to realign pathoanatomic risk factors in addition to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) remains unclear.

Purpose

To evaluate a clinically derived 2-part classification of lateral patellar instability aimed at identifying patients indicated for a concomitant bony procedure.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The study included 122 patients (42 male, 80 female; mean ± SD age, 22 ± 6 years) who were assigned to a mild instability group (mIG) and a complex instability group (cIG) based on the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test (ReDPAT) and J-sign. The mIG had a positive ReDPAT result <40° to 50° of knee flexion and an absent or low-grade J-sign (grade 1), and the cIG had a positive ReDPAT result >40° of knee flexion and/or a high-grade J-sign (grade 2 or 3). The mIG underwent isolated MPFL-R, and the cIG underwent MPFL-R and concomitant bony procedures depending on the established risk factor assessment. For evaluation, the BANFF Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and numeric analog scale (0-10) for patellofemoral pain and subjective knee function were used. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was ascertained by calculating half the standard deviation of baseline scores.

Results

Radiographic analysis confirmed a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation in the cIG regarding severity of trochlear dysplasia, distal malalignment, and patellar height (all P < .05). At final follow-up, no patellar redislocation occurred in either group; 2 patients in the cIG reported patellar subluxation. Within both groups, all outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively (all P < .0001); no between-group difference was found regarding BPII 2.0 score and numeric analog scale for function. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was met by 84% (32/38) of the mIG and 90% (76/84) of the cIG (P = .36), but the cIG experienced more patellofemoral pain than the mIG (1.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.1 ± 2.1; P = .036).

Conclusion

Patients with a high-grade J-sign and/or a positive ReDPAT finding beyond 40° to 50° of knee flexion exhibited a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation; however, the correction of modifiable risk factors led to similarly good outcomes to patients who underwent isolated MPFL-R. A slightly higher level of patellofemoral pain after bony procedures was evident in these patients.

Predictors of Graft Failure After Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The tibiofemoral rotation angle has been found to be higher in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations (RPDs) than in healthy people; however, little is known about the clinical significance of this finding.

PURPOSE

To determine whether an increased tibiofemoral rotation angle is associated with graft failure after primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) and to investigate the role of the tibiofemoral rotation angle in predicting MPFL-R failure in patients with RPDs.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 632 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed RPDs from 2011 to 2018. Postoperative stress radiography of the patellofemoral joint was performed to identify whether the graft failed. After a review, 33 patients who showed MPFL-R failure were allocated to the failure group. They were matched 1:2 to 66 participants who underwent successful MPFL-R (control group). The cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) of the tibiofemoral rotation angle for predicting graft failure after primary MPFL-R were determined, and the risk factors for MPFL-R failure were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The tibiofemoral rotation angle was significantly higher in the failure group than in the control group (16.4° ± 5.6° vs 6.4° ± 4.5°, respectively; P < .001). The cutoff value of the tibiofemoral rotation angle for predicting graft failure was 12.3° (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 89.4%; AUC, 0.920). Overall, 3 risk factors for MPFL-R failure were determined: excessive tibiofemoral rotation (≥12.3°) (odds ratio [OR], 13.159 [95% CI, 2.469-70.139]; P = .003), a preoperative high-grade J-sign (OR, 7.674 [95% CI, 1.232-47.809]; P = .029), and a femoral tunnel malposition (OR, 6.976 [95% CI, 1.077-45.187]; P = .042).

CONCLUSION

In this study, excessive tibiofemoral rotation, a preoperative high-grade J-sign, and a femoral tunnel malposition were identified as risk factors for graft failure after primary MPFL-R in patients with RPDs. More importantly, excessive tibiofemoral rotation ( ≥ 12.3°) may predict the failure of primary MPFL-R, which can help surgeons easily identify high-risk patients of MPFL-R failure before surgery.

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction combined with derotational distal femoral osteotomy yields better outcomes than isolated procedures in patellar dislocation with increased femoral anteversion

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical and radiological outcomes between isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and MPFLR combined with derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) for patellar dislocation with increased femoral anteversion (FA).

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2019, 36 patients who underwent isolated MPFLR and 31 patients who underwent MPFLR combined with DDFO were retrospectively included. Clinical outcomes included physical examinations, functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) scores), activity level (Tegner activity score and return to sports), complications, and patellar re-dislocation rate. Radiological outcomes included patella tilt angle, patellar congruence angle, and patella-trochlear groove distance.

RESULTS

All clinical outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but the DDFO group had significantly better postoperative scores than the MPFLR group (Kujala: 85.1 ± 7.7 vs. 80.5 ± 8.4, P = 0.023; Lysholm: 86.8 ± 8.2 vs. 81.9 ± 9.1, P = 0.026; IKDC: 86.2 ± 10.0 vs. 81.7 ± 8.1, P = 0.045; and BPII: 68.0 ± 12.5 vs. 62.3 ± 10.0, P = 0.039). Both groups achieved successful return to sports (90.3% vs. 91.7%). No re-dislocation or major complications occurred. Radiological outcomes improved significantly in both groups, but the DDFO group had better outcomes (P < 0.05). The tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance was only improved after DDFO from 17.0 ± 2.3 mm to 15.1 ± 2.0 mm (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both isolated MPFLR and MPFLR combined with DDFO yielded satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of patellar dislocation with increased FA. However, combined DDFO had better outcomes and should be considered a priority.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Pathological Thresholds of Segmental Femoral Torsion in Patients With Patellar Dislocation: Influence on Patellofemoral Malalignment

Background

Femoral torsion can be evaluated from different femoral segments. The pathological thresholds for femoral torsion of different segments and the influence of segmental femoral torsion on patellofemoral alignment remain unknown.

Purpose

To compare femoral torsion between patients with recurrent patellar dislocation and healthy individuals, to determine the statistical physiological range and pathological thresholds of femoral torsion in different segments, and to investigate the influence of femoral torsion on patellofemoral malalignment.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with patellar dislocation who received surgical treatment in our department between 2019 and 2020. Healthy participants were recruited as the control group. The control patients were asymptomatic and had no history of lower extremity disorders. The differences in femoral torsion between the study and control groups were compared. The diagnostic capacity of femoral torsion in different segments and their correlation with patellar tilt were investigated. The mean value and 95% CI of femoral torsion in different segments were established using data from healthy volunteers.

Results

A total of 60 patients with patellar dislocation and 100 healthy volunteers were included in this study. The total, mid, and distal femoral torsion values differed significantly between the study and control groups (P < .01). Total femoral torsion had the highest diagnostic value (area under the receiver operating curve = 0.733). Total torsion (r = 0.432; P < .001), mid torsion (r = 0.242; P = .002), and distal torsion (r = 0.324; P < .001) showed significant correlations with patellar tilt. The pathological thresholds of excessive femoral torsion of the total, proximal, mid, and distal femoral segments were 24.73°, 46.68°, –6.55°, and 14.92°, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients with patellar dislocation had greater femoral torsion than healthy individuals in multiple femoral segments. Excessive mid, distal, and total torsion was associated with more significant patellar tilt.

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy for patients with recurrent patellar instability and increased femoral antetorsion improves knee function and adequately treats both torsional and valgus malalignment

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional and radiological outcome following derotational distal femoral osteotomy (D-DFO) in patients with high-grade patellofemoral instability (PFI) and an associated increased femoral antetorsion (FA). It was hypothesized that D-DFO would lead to a good functional and radiological outcome, and that both torsional and coronal malalignment could be normalized.

METHODS

Patients that underwent D-DFO between 06/2011 and 12/2018 for high-grade PFI with an increased FA (> 20°) were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (Visual Analog Scale [VAS] for pain, Kujala score, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form [IKDC], and Tegner Activity Scale [TAS]) were evaluated pre- and minimum 24 months postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lower extremity and weight-bearing whole-leg anteroposterior radiographs were conducted pre- and postoperatively. The change in FA, coronal limb alignment, and PROMs were tested for statistical significance.

RESULTS

In total, 27 patients (30 knees) were included. The D-DFO aimed to only correct FA (Group 1) or to additionally perform a varization (Group 2) in 14 cases each. In the remaining two cases, double-level osteotomies were performed to correct additional tibial deformities. In 25 cases (83.3%), concomitant procedures also addressing patellofemoral instability were performed. At follow-up (38.0 months [25-75% interquartile range 31.8-52.5 months]), a significant reduction in pain (VAS for pain: 2.0 [1.0-5.0] vs. 0 [0-1.0], p < 0.05), significant improvement in knee function (Kujala Score: 55.6 ± SD 13.6 vs. 80.3 ± 16.7, p < 0.05; Lysholm Score: 58.6 ± 17.4 vs. 79.5 ± 16.6, p < 0.05; IKDC: 54.6 ± 18.7 vs. 74.1 ± 15.0, p < 0.05), and an increase in sporting activity (TAS: 3.0 [3.0-4.0] vs. 4.0 [3.0-5.0], p = n.s.) were reported. Femoral antetorsion was significantly reduced (28.2 ± 6.4° vs. 13.6 ± 5.2°, p < 0.05). A significant varization was observed in Group 2 (2.4 ± 1.2° valgus vs. 0.3 ± 2.4° valgus; p < 0.05). In one case, patellar redislocation occurred 70 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with PFI and an associated increased FA, D-DFO achieved a significant reduction in pain, an improvement of subjective knee function, as well as an adequate correction of torsional and coronal alignment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Inter-rater Reliability of the Classification of the J-Sign Is Inadequate Among Experts

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the symmetry, classification, and underlying pathoanatomy associated with the J-sign in patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability.

STUDY DESIGN

Blinded, inter-rater reliability study.

SETTING

N/A.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty patellofemoral joint experts.

INTERVENTIONS

Thirty clinicians independently assessed 30 video recordings of patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability performing the J-sign test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Raters documented J-sign symmetry and graded it according to the quadrant and Donell classifications. Raters indicated the most significant underlying pathoanatomy and presence of sagittal plane maltracking. Intra-rater reliability was assessed by 4 raters repeating the assessments. Mean pairwise simple and/or weighted Cohen's kappa were performed to measure inter-rater and intra-rater reliability, as well as calculation of percent agreement.

RESULTS

J-sign symmetry demonstrated fair inter-rater reliability (k = 0.26), whereas intra-rater reliability was moderate (k = 0.48). Inter-rater reliability for the quadrant and Donell classifications indicated moderate agreement, k = 0.51 and k = 0.49, respectively, whereas intra-rater reliability was k = 0.79 and k = 0.72, indicating substantial agreement. Inter-rater reliability of the foremost underlying pathoanatomy produced only slight agreement (k = 0.20); however, intra-rater reliability was substantial (k = 0.68). Sagittal plane maltracking demonstrated slight inter-rater agreement (k = 0.23) but substantial intra-rater agreement (k = 0.64).

CONCLUSIONS

The symmetry, classification, and underlying pathoanatomy of the J-sign demonstrated fair to moderate inter-rater reliability and moderate to substantial intra-rater reliability among expert reviewers using video recordings of patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability. These findings suggest individual raters have a consistent standard for assessing the J-sign, but that these standards are not reliable between assessors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Can Patella Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty be Treated With Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction?

Background

The aim of this study was to describe outcomes of patients who had undergone medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) to treat patellofemoral instability (PFI) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Material and methods

This is a retrospective case series of consecutive patients treated for PFI after TKA. Patients were included if they had radiographic documentation of patella dislocation or subluxation and component position was adequate. MPFLr was performed using a quadriceps tendon autograft. The graft was fixed with either an interference or additional suspensory fixation. A tibial tubercle osteotomy was performed in select indications. Patients were assessed with Kujala and International Knee Score (IKS) at a minimum 12-month follow-up and radiographically with plain radiographs.

Results

A total of 22 patients (23 procedures) were included. The mean follow-up period was 38 months (range 12-72). Average preoperative femoral component rotation on computed tomography was 0.10° external rotation (range 3° internal rotation to 3° external rotation). All patients had improved clinical and radiographic outcomes postoperatively. At the last follow-up, the mean IKS knee score was 77.6 ± 13.1, mean IKS function score was 75.2 ± 23.3, and mean Kujala score was 60.2/100 ± 10.9. There was 1 mechanical failure, which occurred following MPFLr with interference fixation. There were 6 complications (28.1%) postoperatively. Patients receiving double fixation of the MPFLr graft had higher clinical and radiographic scores; however, this difference was not statistically significant. MPFLr had a patella-lowering effect, 0.97 preoperatively to 0.74 postoperatively (P = .069).

Conclusion

MPFLr in appropriately selected patients is a satisfactory option to treat PFI following TKA.

Combined distal femoral osteotomy and tibial tuberosity distalization is effective in patients presenting with patellar instability and patellofemoral pain due to patella alta and femoral malalignment

INTRODUCTION

Patellar malalignment has been considered one of the major pathomechanical causes of patellofemoral instability and pain. The results have been reported after femoral varization/torsional osteotomy and tibial tuberosity distalization osteotomy (TTD-O). However, the combination of a femoral deformity (genu valgum/increased femur antetorsion) and patella alta remains underreported. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients simultaneously treated by distal femoral osteotomy and TTD-O. The hypothesis was that restoration of patellofemoral (PF) alignment via the abovementioned osteotomies would achieve good patient-reported outcome measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2016 and 2019, a series of 25 knees in 20 patients were treated by a distal femoral osteotomy combined with a TTD-O aiming to correct patellofemoral malalignment consisting of genu valgum and/or increased femur antetorsion and patella alta. Six patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient refused to participate. Thus, 17 knees in 13 patients (male/female 1/12; age 27.4 ± 5.4 years) were included and comprised the study group for this investigation. Patients were evaluated after a mean of 3.1 ± 0.9 years postoperatively. The Kujala anterior knee pain scale and the PF-subscale of the Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome score (KOOS-PF) were used to assess patients' reported outcome measures from pre- to postoperatively.

RESULTS

The mean amount of torsional correction, valgus correction, and tibial tuberosity distalization averaged 14° (10°-18°), 5.2° (3.8°-8°), and 9 mm (6°-15 mm), respectively. The Kujala score increased by an average of 24.18 points from a mean of 66.6 ± 18.3 points (34-93 points) preoperatively to 90.8 ± 14.2 points (44-100 points) postoperatively (95% CI - 33.0 to - 15.3; p < 0.0001). The KOOS-PF score increased by an average of 33.7 points from a mean of 49.5 ± 24.5 points (9.1-88.6 points) preoperatively to 83.2 ± 21.6 points (15.9 -100 points) postoperatively (95% CI - 47.5 to - 19.9; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study indicate that the combination of a distal femoral osteotomy and a tibial tuberosity distalization osteotomy is effective in patients presenting with patellar instability and patellofemoral pain due to patella alta and femoral malalignment.

Preoperative serum calcium could be a prognostic factor for surgical treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation: a retrospective study

Background

Surgical treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) could yield good outcomes. While, unsatisfactory recovery still exists in some cases. For all prognostic factors, serum biomarkers have rarely been investigated. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative serum calcium level, a widely used serum biomarker, in surgical treatment for RPD.

Study design

Retrospective study.

Methods

Ninety-nine patients with RPD were enrolled in the study. Preoperative serum calcium was acquired from routinely tested blood 1 day prior to operation. Demographic data, characteristics of RPD, postoperative functional outcomes were obtained. The association between preoperative calcium and postoperative functional outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC and KOOS score) was determined by correlation analysis and multivariate linear regression analysis. Poor recovery was determined as Kujala score below 80. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the prognostic value of preoperative calcium.

Results

Patients were followed up for a mean period of 2.45 ± 1.33 years. All clinical scores showed significant improvement at the latest follow-up. Correlation and multivariate linear analyses indicated that serum calcium level was an important factor related with the prognosis of surgical treatment for RPD. According to the ROC curve, the cut-off value for preoperative calcium was 2.225 mmol/L. The clinical outcomes of patients with a preoperative blood calcium < 2.225 mmol/L was significantly worse than that with a higher calcium level. The correspondent sensitivity was 0.812 with a specificity of 0.633.

Conclusion

Operative treatment for RPD achieved good results, while in some cases the functional scores remain inferior. As a serum biomarker, preoperative calcium could be prognostic for outcomes after surgical treatment for RPD.

The Increased Tibiofemoral Rotation: A Potential Contributing Factor for Patellar Maltracking in Patients with Recurrent Patellar Dislocation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between tibiofemoral rotation and patellar maltracking in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation.

METHODS

A total of 143 consecutive knees (118 patients) with clinically diagnosed recurrent patellar dislocation from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patellar tilt angle and bisect offset index were recorded on axial CT to assesses the severity of patellar maltracking. Tibiofemoral rotation angle is measured by comparing the angle between the posterior femoral and tibial condylar lines on three-dimensional CT. The Pearson correlation was calculated to investigate the association between tibiofemoral rotation angle and patellar maltracking. Patients were divided into the rotation group (≥15°) and control group (<15°) based on the value of tibiofemoral rotation and a further comparison was performed. To further clarify the complicated relationship among tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG), tibial tubercle-posterior cruciate ligament distance (TT-PCL), tibiofemoral rotation, and patellar maltracking, patients were divided into four subgroups according to the value of TT-TG and TT-PCL.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative tibiofemoral rotation angle was 12° ± 6° (range, 0°-31°). Pearson correlation between patellar maltracking parameters (bisect offset index, patellar tilt angle) and various bony deformities found that the tibiofemoral rotation angle was moderately correlated with bisect offset index (r = 0.451, p < 0.001) and patellar tilt angle (r = 0.462, p < 0.001). Further results demonstrated that bisect offset index (152.1 vs 121.2, p < 0.001) and patellar tilt angle (41.2° vs 33.5°, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the rotation group than that in control group. For patients with a TT-TG distance of >20 mm, the increased TT-TG distance was mainly caused by tibiofemoral rotation angle in group C (TT-TG > 20 mm, TT-PCL < 24 mm) and predominantly induced by tibial tubercle lateralization in group D (TT-TG > 20 mm, TT-PCL > 24 mm). Bisect offset index and patellar tilt angle were significantly higher in the group C than group D.

CONCLUSION

The increased tibiofemoral rotation angle is associated with patellar maltracking in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. Patients with increased tibiofemoral rotation angle usually have more severe patellar maltracking.

Derotational distal femoral osteotomy yields satisfactory clinical outcomes in pathological femoral rotation with failed medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of de-rotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) in patients who underwent primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) failure with increased femoral anteversion along with high-grade J sign.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2019, 14 patients underwent DDFO revision surgery due to failed MPFLR. The pre- and postoperative J sign grade, Caton-Deschamps index (CDI), tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, femoral anteversion angle (FAA), patellar lateral tilt angle (PLTA), MPFL graft laxity, and patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective scores) were collected. The anterior-posterior and proximal-distal distances between the actual point and the Schöttle point were also calculated.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients underwent MPFLR revision by DDFO combined with MPFLR. The mean PLTA improved from 40.7° ± 11.9° to 20.5° ± 8.7° (P < 0.001). The mean FAA significantly decreased from 42.7° ± 12.0° to 14.1° ± 5.2° (P < 0.001). The mean patellar laxity index (PLI) decreased from 82.4% preoperatively to 15.1% postoperatively (P < 0.001). None of these patients experienced subluxation or re-dislocation during follow-up of 29.7 ± 5.0 months after revision surgery. Meanwhile, the Tegner score at the last follow-up ranged from 3 to 6, with a median of 5. The Kujala, Lysholm, and IKDC subjective scores showed significant improvements, from a mean of 51.0 ± 6.8 preoperatively to 75.4 ± 5.1 postoperatively (P < 0.001), 49.2 ± 7.9 to 75.2 ± 7.2 (P < 0.001), and 42.9 ± 6.2 to 76.8 ± 6.0 (P < 0.001), respectively. The proportion of patients with a high-grade J sign was significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively (100% vs. 14%). Four out of 14 patients (29%) showed femoral tunnel mal-positioning.

CONCLUSION

MPFLR revision by DDFO combined with MPFLR achieved favorable clinical outcomes in patients with increased femoral anteversion along with high-grade J sign.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The J-sign and the body mass index determine the disease-specific quality of life in patients with lateral patellar instability

PURPOSE

To determine which risk factors for patellar instability contribute most relevantly to patients' subjective disease-specific quality of life, aiming to provide implications on the overall treatment decision-making process.

METHODS

A total of 182 consecutive patients (male/female 70/112; mean age 23.6 ± 7.3 years) with a history of patellar instability were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patient age, body mass index (BMI), number of dislocations, reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test (ReDPAT), J-sign severity, and pathoanatomic risk factors of patellar instability were assessed. The statistical analysis evaluated the relationships among those variables and determined their ability to predict the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) as a disease-specific quality of life measure. Using Spearman correlation, ANOVA and Fisher's exact test, all variables with ANOVA p ≤ 0.1 or Spearman's abs (rho) > 0.1 were entered into a multivariate linear model using backward-stepwise selection.

RESULTS

Analysis of the individual variables' ability to predict BPII 2.0 score values revealed 'age', 'BMI', 'ReDPAT', 'high grade of trochlear dysplasia', and 'high-grade J-Sign' as possible relevant factors. Backward-stepwise multivariate regression analysis yielded a final parsimonious model that included the factors 'BMI' and 'J-Sign (Grade II and III)' as the most relevant parameters influencing BPII 2.0 score values (adjusted R² = 0.418; p < 0.001), with a cutoff value for BMI found at 28 kg/m² (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that in patients with lateral patellar instability, a high-grade J-sign and an increased BMI significantly impact subjective disease-specific quality of life.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Derotational Femoral Osteotomy for Treating Recurrent Patellar Dislocation in the Presence of Increased Femoral Anteversion: A Systematic Review

Background:

Studies on the clinical outcomes of derotational femoral osteotomy to treat recurrent patellar dislocation in the presence of increased femoral anteversion are limited.

Purpose:

To investigate the role of derotational femoral osteotomy in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation in the presence of increased femoral anteversion.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) by searching the Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases through February 10, 2021. Included were studies of skeletally mature patients presenting with recurrent patellar dislocation and exhibiting increased femoral anteversion who subsequently underwent derotational femoral osteotomy. Methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score. The basic characteristics of each study were recorded and analyzed: characteristic information, radiological parameters, surgical techniques, patient-reported outcomes, and complications.

Results:

A total of 6 studies with 163 patients (170 knees) were included. Sample sizes ranged from 7 to 66 patients, and the patients were predominantly women (range, 79%-100%). The mean age and follow-up ranges were 18 to 28 years and 16 to 44 months, respectively. The mean femoral anteversion decreased significantly from 34° preoperatively to 12° postoperatively. In studies reporting pre- and postoperative outcomes, significant improvements were found in the Lysholm score (from 24.8 to 44.1), Kujala score (from 15.8 to 41.9), International Knee Documentation Committee score (from 11.0 to 28.0), and visual analog scale for pain (from 2.0 to 3.7). All studies reported postoperative complications, giving an overall reported complication rate of 4.7%, but no redislocations occurred during the follow-up period.

Conclusion:

For recurrent patellar dislocation in the presence of increased femoral anteversion, combination treatment with derotational femoral osteotomy led to favorable clinical outcomes with a low redislocation rate. However, there was no consensus among researchers on the indications for derotational femoral osteotomy in the treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation.

[Primary and recurrent patellar dislocation: recommendation for diagnostic evaluation, risk stratification and treatment]

The dogma that (every) primary patellar dislocation should be treated non-operatively is considered outdated. Therefore, every first-time dislocation, as well as every recurrent dislocation, should be fully diagnosed with regard to the injury pattern and anatomically predisposing risk factors. This enables the use of risk stratification models to assess the risk of recurrent episodes of instability, thereby supporting the clinical decision-making process. The reconstruction of the MPFL can be considered an established and successful treatment strategy for patellar instability. However, the additional correction of bony risk factors is often useful. In this context, the preoperative grading of the J sign and dynamic assessment of patellar instability (dynamic apprehension test) are of utmost importance. These findings, combined with the radiographic imaging findings, can be used as a clinical decision aid for a bony correction procedure.

Abnormal femur rotation in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation: A study on upright standing three-dimensionally reconstructed EOS images

BACKGROUND

The measurements of lower extremity rotational deformities in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in the standing position are available with the application of the EOS imaging system. The aim of our case-control study was to identify the differences on the femur rotation between the supine and standing positions, and to investigate the differences of anatomical and functional femur rotation between RPD patients and controls.

METHODS

Thirty-five lower extremities affected by RPD from 30 patients and 27 intact lower extremities from 27 controls with acute meniscus tear or anterior cruciate ligament injury were recruited. Anatomical femoral anteversion (AFA), functional femoral anteversion (FFA), femorotibial rotation (FTR) and distal femoral torsion (DFT) of all subjects were measured with the EOS imaging system. Computed tomography scans were carried out to analyze the AFA and FFA in the supine position in PRD patients. The differences in FFA between supine and standing position and in AFA, FTR and DFT between RPD and controls were analyzed. The predictor importance of each variable on RPD was observed after cluster analysis.

RESULTS

The EOS images were available in all subjects. The FFA was significantly smaller in the standing position than in the supine position (P < 0.05) in RPD patients. When comparing with the controls, RPD patients showed higher AFA, FTR and DFT (P < 0.05) but comparable FFA (P < 0.05). The cluster model prompted that FTR and DFT had higher predictor importance than AFA.

CONCLUSION

Larger AFA but comparable FFA in patients with RPD than the controls in an upright standing position suggested more internally rotated distal femur in the RPD patients. AFA may be inadequate and FFA should also be considered while planning the treatment for RPD. DFT and FTR should be taken into consideration when evaluating the abnormalities in femur rotation in RPD patients.

Closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy combined with medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation with genu valgum

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is a well-established procedure for addressing recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) in young patients. However, despite being a promising procedure for RPD with genu valgum, there is a scarcity of reports on simultaneous MPFLR and closing-wedge distal femoral osteotomy (CWDFO). The purpose of the present study was to observe and analyse the clinical and imaging findings of CWDFO combined with MPFLR for RPD with genu valgum.

METHODS

From May 2015 to April 2018, 25 patients with RPD and genu valgum were surgically treated in our department. Anteroposterior long-leg, weight-bearing, lower-extremity radiographs, lateral radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans of the patellofemoral joint were obtained, and the anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), weight-bearing line rate (WBLR), patellar height, patellar lateral shift (PLS) and tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance were analysed. Validated knee scores, such as the Kujala, Lysholm, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and Tegner socres, were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

25 patients, with an average age of 19.8 years (14-27), were evaluated. During the 2-year follow-up period, all patients were able to achieve a better sports level without any problems, with no recurrence of patellar instability. Compared with preoperation, the aFTA, mLDFA, WBLR and PLS showed statistically significant improvement following the procedure (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, no significant differences in the Insall index and TT-TG distance were found. The mean Kujala score, average Lysholm score, VAS score and Tegner socres showed significant postoperative improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

CWDFO combined with MPFLR is a suitable treatment for RPD with genu valgum, and can lead to significant improvement in the clinical and imaging findings of the knee in the short term.

Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Lateral Dislocation Treated With Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis

Background

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) is widely used to treat patellofemoral instability. However, it is still unclear when a concomitant bony procedure is needed.

Purpose

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of isolated MPFLR for recurrent patellar lateral dislocation and to identify the prognostic factors for clinical outcomes.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 237 patients who had undergone unilateral isolated MPFLR between January 2011 and December 2016 were included. Patellar tracking (J sign) and radiologic information including patellar height, trochlear dysplasia, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance, and patellar tilt was collected preoperatively, and the Kujala and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) functional scores were used to assess postoperative recovery. Failure was defined as redislocation or patient-reported and clinically confirmed patellar instability. The influence of radiologic features and the J sign on knee functional scores was explored via subgroup analysis. Potential prognostic factors were explored using univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and risk factors for a positive J sign were evaluated using Spearman coefficient correlation analysis.

Results

The mean ± SD follow-up period was 70.67 ± 18.05 months (range, 36-108 months). From preoperatively to final follow-up, all patients had statistically and clinically significant improvements in the Kujala score (from 51.43 ± 6.87 to 88.52 ± 4.83; P < .001) and IKDC score (from 49.78 ± 6.05 to 81.16 ± 4.20; P < .001). Subgroup analysis indicated no significant difference in functional score improvements based on radiologic features or the J sign. Overall, 20 knees (8.4%) experienced postoperative failure: 11 with redislocation and 9 with patellar instability. A preoperative positive J sign was shown to be an independent prognostic factor for postoperative failure via logistic regression analyses: univariate (odds ratio, 3.340; 95% CI, 1.316-8.480; P = .011) and multivariate (odds ratio, 3.038; 95% CI, 1.179-7.827; P = .021). In addition, the J sign was closely associated with patellar height (r _S, 0.159; P = .014) and trochlear dysplasia (r _S, 0.235; P < .001).

Conclusion

Isolated MPFLR appears to be an effective strategy for recurrent patellar lateral dislocation, with significant functional improvement and a low failure rate. A preoperative positive J sign was identified as a potential prognostic risk factor for postoperative failure.

Malalignment sign on knee magnetic resonance imaging: a new predictor for excessive femoral anteversion in patients with patellar dislocation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical relevance of the newly identified malalignment sign in predicting excessive femoral anteversion in patients with patellar dislocations.

METHODS

A total of 55 patients with patellar dislocation who underwent surgical treatment between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. Femoral anteversion, tibial torsion, and the femorotibial index were measured via a CT scan. The malalignment sign on the knee MRI was defined as a malalignment between the lateral side of the intercondylar fossa of the femur and the lateral intercondylar eminence of the tibial plateau.

RESULTS

A positive malalignment sign was observed in 36 of the 55 patients. Increased femoral anteversion was significantly correlated with the number of frames with a positive malalignment sign (r = 0.511, P < 0.001). The value of femoral anteversion was significantly greater in the group with a positive malalignment sign (P = 0.02). For a femoral anteversion value of 32°, the sensitivity and specificity of the malalignment sign reached the maximal level of 89.5% and 47.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increased femoral anteversion correlated significantly with a positive malalignment sign on knee MRI. However, tibial torsion did not affect the malalignment sign. A positive malalignment sign is evidence for femoral derotation osteotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The presence of a preoperative high-grade J-sign and femoral tunnel malposition are associated with residual graft laxity after MPFL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyse the risk factors associated with residual graft laxity after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD).

METHODS

A total of 312 consecutive patients (354 knees) with clinically diagnosed RPD who underwent MPFL-R from 2011 to 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Postoperative MPFL graft stability was assessed with patellofemoral stress radiography, and if the patellar central ridge surpassed the apex of the lateral femoral trochlea, the reconstructed MPFL was defined as having residual graft laxity. Finally, 15 patients who exhibited MPFL residual graft laxity (study group) were matched in a 1:2 fashion to 30 control participants (control group), who showed a normal postoperative patellar stability on stress radiography. Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) was used to identify patients with a high-grade J-sign. Femoral tunnel position was assessed using 3D-CT to identify cases with femoral tunnel malposition. Potential predictors of MPFL residual graft laxity, including age, sex, a preoperative high-grade J-sign, femoral tunnel malposition, and several radiological parameters, were assessed by logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A preoperative high-grade J-sign was identified in 66.7% of the study group, which was significantly higher than that the 13.3% in the control group (P = 0.001). In addition, the presence of a preoperative high-grade J-sign (odds ratio, 11.9 [95% CI, 1.7-82.8]; P = 0.012) and femoral tunnel malposition (odds ratio, 8.2 [95% CI, 1.2-58.0]; P = 0.036) were determined to be independent risk factors associated with residual graft laxity after MPFL-R.

CONCLUSION

The presence of a preoperative high-grade J-sign and femoral tunnel malposition are associated with residual graft laxity after MPFL-R in patients with RPD. These results may provide additional information for counselling patients on residual graft laxity after MPFL-R.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With or Without Derotational Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Treating Recurrent Patellar Dislocation With Increased Femoral Anteversion: A Retrospective Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists regarding the surgical treatment of recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) with an increased femoral anteversion angle (FAA). Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) either alone or combined with derotational distal femoral osteotomy (DDFO) results in favorable clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of MPFL-R versus MPFL-R with DDFO in treating RPD with increased FAA (>30°).

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and December 2017, 126 patients (135 knees) with RPD and increased FAA (>30°) were surgically treated using MPFL-R with or without DDFO and eligible for this retrospective study. These patients were allocated into 2 groups based on whether an additional DDFO was performed: the DDFO group (MPFL-R + DDFO with or without tibial tubercle transfer; n = 66) and the control group (MPFL-R with or without tibial tubercle transfer; n = 69). Pre- and postoperative patellar stability was measured using stress radiography. Patellar maltracking (J-sign) and patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and Tegner scores) were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying the results in terms of the severity of preoperative patellar maltracking (low-grade vs high-grade J-sign).

RESULTS

A total of 135 knees (126 patients) with a mean follow-up time of 3.7 ± 1.2 years were evaluated in the present study. The rates of postoperative MPFL residual graft laxity and residual J-sign were significantly lower in the DDFO group than in the control group (6% vs 19%, P = .028; 33% vs 54%, P = .018). The DDFO group had significantly higher Kujala (82.3 vs 76.7; P = .001) and Lysholm (83.7 vs 77.7; P = .034) scores than the control group had postoperatively. For patients with a preoperative high-grade J-sign, further subgroup analysis demonstrated that the DDFO group had a significantly lower rate of MPFL residual graft laxity than the control group had (18% vs 57%; P = .029).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, treatment of RPD with increased femoral anteversion using MPFL-R with DDFO yielded more favorable subjective and objective outcomes than did MPFL-R without DDFO, and this circumstance was more remarkable when the patients had a preoperative high-grade J-sign.

Preoperative Complete Patellofemoral Dislocation in Extension Predicts an Inferior Clinical Outcome After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Dislocation

Background:

Habitual patellar dislocation in extension (HPD-E) is a distinctive subtype of recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD); HPD-E represents the most severe type of patellar maltracking in RPD. It has been reported that the presence of preoperative patellar maltracking is associated with a worse clinical outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction (MPFL-R).

Purpose:

To describe the radiological characteristics of HPD-E and to compare clinical outcomes after MPFL-R among patients with and without preoperative HPD-E.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

From January 2012 to December 2015, a total of 230 consecutive patients (246 knees) with RPD were treated with MPFL-R alone or combined with tibial tubercle osteotomy. Among them, 28 patients diagnosed with HPD-E by preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT; HPD-E group) were matched in a 1:1 fashion to 28 control participants who did not show HPD-E (control group). Routine radiography and CT were performed to evaluate patellar height, trochlear dysplasia, tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance, and torsional deformities. The mean patellar laxity index and lateral patellar translation assessed with stress radiography were measured preoperatively and postoperatively to quantify MPFL laxity. At minimum 2-year follow-up, patient-reported outcomes (Kujala, Lysholm, and Tegner scores), patellar maltracking, and redislocation rates were compared between the HPD-E and control groups.

Results:

The radiological characteristics of the HPD-E group were as follows: 89% (25/28) of patients had severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour type B or D), and the mean femoral anteversion angle was 35.5° ± 4.7°. At the final follow-up, the HPD-E group had a significantly lower Kujala score (76.2 vs 84.5, respectively; P = .001), Lysholm score (75.4 vs 86.6, respectively; P < .001), and Tegner score (4.1 vs 5.8, respectively; P = .021) compared with the control group. The postoperative patellar laxity index (43% vs 19%, respectively; P < .001) and redislocation rate (25% vs 0%, respectively; P = .01) were significantly higher in the HPD-E group than in the control group.

Conclusion:

Preoperative 3-dimensional CT is a reliable method of identfying patients with HPD-E. Treatment of HPD-E by MPFL-R alone or combined with tibial tubercle osteotomy resulted in a higher redislocation rate, more severe MPFL residual laxity, and lower patient-reported outcome scores compared with patients without HPD-E who underwent MPFL-R.