Varus deformity in the proximal tibia and immediate postoperative varus alignment result in varus progression in limb alignment in the long term after total knee arthroplasty

Influence of Distal Reference Point of the Tibial Mechanical Axis on the Ankle and Hindlimb Alignment Change after Total Knee Arthroplasty

The alignment philosophy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has tended to shift from the gold standard of mechanically aligned technique to personalized alignment, such as the kinematically aligned (KA) technique. However, the influences of different surgical techniques on lower limb alignment relative to the ground are not fully investigated. This study investigated the influence of the ankle and hindlimb alignment change after mechanically aligned TKA and KA-TKA. The varus osteoarthritic patients who underwent TKAs were divided into a mechanically aligned TKA group (group M, n = 50) and a KA-TKA group (group K, n = 50). Radiographic parameters (hip-knee-calcaneus [HKC] angle, hip-knee-ankle [HKA] angle, talar tilt angle [TTA], and tibiocalcaneal angle [TCA]) were investigated using full-length standing radiographs. The deviation angle (ΔTA; angle between the tibial mechanical axis [TMA] and the ground tibial mechanical axis [gTMA]) and the change of ΔTA (cΔTA) were also assessed. These parameters were compared between the two groups, along with the correlation between the preoperative HKA angle and other parameters. ΔTA, TTA, and TCA showed no differences between the groups pre- and postoperatively, and no significant changes were observed postoperatively. The preoperative HKA angle showed a significant negative correlation with cΔTA in both groups (group M: r = -0.33, p = 0.02; group K: r = -0.29, p = 0.04) although no correlation was observed the with preoperative TTA and TCA. Despite no change in ΔTA after surgery, the preoperative varus deformity was associated with a change in the deviation between gTMA and TMA after surgery. A severely varus knee may be inappropriate for ground KA-TKA.

Twenty-year survivorship cohort study of total knee arthroplasty in Asian patient using a single posterior-stabilized implant performed by a single surgeon

INTRODUCTION

As life expectancy has improved, the potential number of revision candidates is also expected to increase among patients who have undergone a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The longevity of modern posterior stabilized knee prostheses after 20 years of use has not been well documented, especially in Asian populations that require a deeper flexion range due to a floor-based lifestyle.

HYPOTHESIS

Firstly, the implant longevity regarding mechanical failures such as aseptic loosening and polyethylene (PE) wear would vary over a longer follow-up depending on the age groups; and secondly there would be unique risk factors for revision surgery in an Asian TKA cohort.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted this age-stratified survival analysis in a consecutive series of 368 NexGen Legacy Posterior Stabilized (LPS) TKAs performed by a single surgeon. These cases were divided into four age groups (< 60 years, early 60s, late 60s, and ≥ 70 years). The implant longevity against aseptic mechanical failures was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The revision surgery risk was evaluated using postoperative factors including a deep flexion capability (> 135̊), and postoperative mechanical alignments.

RESULTS

Overall survivorship was significantly lower in the youngest groups than other groups (Log-rank test, p=0.001). The cumulative 20-year implant longevity was more than 95% in the two oldest groups, but less than 60% in the youngest group. It was notable that the post-TKA implant longevity was not apparent up to 10 years between the age groups (p=0.073∼0.458). Aseptic loosening was observed with an earlier onset (3.1 to 18.9 years) trend than PE wear (9.8∼17.9 years), with most cases arising in the youngest groups. Flexion limitation and varus alignment were significant risks to aseptic loosening and PE wear (Cox proportional hazard regression: p=0.001 and 0.045, respectively).

DISCUSSION

A younger age (< 60 years), inability of postoperative deep flexion, and varus alignment were significant risk factors for aseptic loosening and PE wear after modern PS design in this Asian cohort. The difference in postoperative longevity affected by these factors was not obvious during the first 10 years but emerged over a second decade.

LEVEL OF PROOF

III; retrospective cohort study.

The impact of postoperative inclination of the joint line on clinical outcomes in total knee arthroplasty using a prosthesis with anatomical geometry

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of postoperative inclination of the joint line on clinical results after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a prosthesis with anatomical geometry. This study included 145 primary cruciate-retaining type of knee prosthesis with anatomical geometry. Three years postoperatively, clinical outcomes including the patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were recorded. Limb alignment was evaluated by the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis and inclination of the joint line was assessed by the joint line orientation angle (JLOA). Knees were divided into two groups according to the HKA: in-range (- 3 to 3°) and outlier group (< - 3° or > 3°) or the JLOA: in-range (2-4°) and outlier group (< 2° or > 4°), and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Postoperative Knee Society Function Score (KS-FS) was significantly higher in the HKA in-range group than the outlier group (p = 0.01). The Knee Society Knee Score and all subscales of the Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were comparable between the groups. A multivariate analysis revealed a significant association between age at operation and postoperative KS-FS > of 80 points. Neither HKA in-range nor JLOA in-range were associated with the higher knee function. In conclusion, TKA-postoperative inclination of the joint line was not relevant to the short-term PROs. Treatment strategies that attempt to make joint line inclination in order to improve postoperative PROs should be avoided, and alignment goals such as kinematic alignment should be considered carefully.

Improved angle accuracy of tibial plateau osteotomy for total knee arthroplasty using tibial mechanical axis skin-mapping

Background

The tibial crest is often used as an anatomic landmark for tibial plateau osteotomy (TPO) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but it is not very accurate. This study aimed to investigate errors in using the tibial crest as a marker and present a simple approach to improve the angle accuracy of TPO by mapping the tibial mechanical axis (TMA), determined preoperatively, according to the tibial crest on the skin overlying the tibia.

Methods

We evaluated 50 healthy young volunteers and 100 pre-TKA osteoarthritic knees. The middle tibial crest lines (MTCLs) were marked on the shank tibial skin and covered with Kirschner wires. All participants underwent two sets of anteroposterior (AP) standing radiographs of the lower extremity, with the feet in neutral and external rotation positions. The MTCL-TMA angles were measured and compared. The TMA was mapped onto the tibial skin according to the MTCL-TMA angle prior to TKA and used for TPO. Postoperative outcomes were determined by the angle between the vertical tibial component axis (TCA) and the TMA.

Results

The MTCL had no evident relationship with the TMA. A few MTCLs were parallel to the TMA. External rotation of the foot significantly changed the MTCL-TMA relationship. The angle accuracy of the TPO as guided by TMA skin-mapping was 0.83 ± 0.76°. No postoperative errors exceeded 3°.

Conclusion

The MTCL was not equivalent to the TMA. The TPO error can be reduced by preoperatively marking the TMA on the tibial skin according to the MTCL.

Seven phenotypes of varus osteoarthritic knees can be identified in the coronal plane

PURPOSE

Recommendations for resecting distal femur and proximal tibia in mechanical and anatomical alignment techniques are standardized. Kinematic alignment propagates individualizing resection planes. Whether significant variation exists, to warrant departure from standardized resection planes, has not been shown thus far in a large cohort of knees and with a wide range of varus deformity. The null hypothesis of this study was that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees. The aim of this paper was to determine whether distinct phenotypes could be identified, based on variations in coronal femoral and tibial morphology, which could aid in surgical planning and categorizing varus knees for future studies.

METHODS

2129 full-leg weightbearing radiographs were analyzed (1704 preoperative; 425 of contralateral arthritic knee). Measurements made were of HKA (hip-knee-ankle angle), VCA (valgus correction angle), mLDFA (lateral mechanical distal femoral angle), aLDFA (lateral anatomical distal femoral angle), MPTA (medial proximal tibial angle), MNSA (medial neck shaft angle), TAMA (angle between tibial mechanical and anatomical axes), and TPDR (percentage length of tibia proximal to extra-articular deformity).

RESULTS

Seven distinct types were identified covering 2021 knees, reducible to 4 broad phenotypes: 11% were Type 1 'Neutral' knees showing values close to reported normal knees (mean VCA 5.5°, mLDFA 87°, aLDFA 81°). 38% were Type 2 'Intra-articular varus' with medial intra-articular bone loss (mean mLDFA 90.9°, MPTA 85.4°, VCA of 5.7°). 41% were Type 3 'Extra-articular varus' with extra-articular deformity (EAD). Type 3a had proximal tibial EAD; Type 3b had tibial diaphyseal EAD; Type 3c had femoral EAD (mean VCA 8.7°, HKA 166°), and severe medial bone loss (mean mLDFA 92°, MPTA 83°). 9% were Type 4 'Valgoid type' with features of valgus knees: Type 4a had medial femoral bowing (mean VCA 2.9°); Type 4b had significant distal femoral valgus (mean mLDFA 85.3°, aLDFA 78.6°).

CONCLUSIONS

The null hypothesis that there was no phenotypic variation in varus osteoarthritic knees was rejected as considerable variation was found in coronal morphology of femur and tibia. Four broad phenotypic groups could be identified. Plane of the knee joint articular surface was quite variable. This has relevance to planning and performance of corrective osteotomies, unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Under-correction of preoperative varus alignment does not lead to a difference in in-vivo bone loading in 3D-SPECT/CT compared to neutral alignment

BACKGROUND

The aim was to investigate the correlation of bone tracer uptake (BTU) in SPECT/CT and changes in coronal knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We questioned if undercorrection of preoperative varus alignment leads to a difference in BTU compared to neutral alignment.

METHODS

Consecutive 66 patients who received SPECT/CT before and after TKA were retrospectively included. Adjusted mechanical alignment was the alignment target. The alignment of the knee was measured on 3D-CT by selecting standardized landmarks. Maximum (mean ± SD) and relative BTU (ratio to the reference) were recorded using a previously validated localization scheme (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

In the native group, 20 knees were aligned (30.3%) in valgus (HKA > 181.5°), 12 (18.2%) in neutral (178.5°-181.5°) and 34 (51.5%) in varus (HKA < 178°). Overall TKA changed the alignment towards neutral. 48.5% remained in the same groups, whereas 50% of native valgus and 33% of varus knees changed to neutral after TKA. In native varus alignment mean BTU was significantly higher in some medial tibial and femoral regions (fem1ia (p = 0.010), fem1ip (p = 0.002), tib1a.mid (p = 0.005), tib1a.tray (p = 0.000), tib1p.tray (p = 0.000)); in native valgus alignment mean BTU was higher in the corresponding lateral tibial and femoral regions (fem2ip (p = 0.001), tib2a.tray (p = 0.011), tib2p.tray (p = 0.002)). After TKA, a significant decrease in femoral and tibial BTU (femoral preoperative BTU 1.64 +/-0.69; femoral postoperative BTU 0.95 +/-0.42; p = 0.000// tibial preoperative BTU 1.65 +/- 0.93; tibial postoperative BTU 1.16 +/- 0.48; p = 0.000) and an increase in patellar BTU was observed (p = 0.025). Native varus alignment correlated with a higher medial BTU decrease medially. Undercorrection of preoperative varus alignment showed no higher BTU after TKA.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative varus alignment correlated with a higher decrease in BTU in specific femoral and tibial medial regions. Preoperative valgus alignment correlated with a higher decrease in the corresponding lateral regions. Undercorrection of preoperative varus alignment did not lead to higher bone loading reflected by BTU after TKA.

Alignment evaluation using different distal reference points after total knee arthroplasty

Background

To assess alignment for total knee arthroplasty, the center of the ankle has been used as the main reference point for the distal tibia; however, the true load-bearing mechanical axis should be determined as a line from the center of the femoral head to the lowest point of calcaneus. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare the differences in alignment.

Methods

Patients with medial osteoarthritis who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (Group A, center of ankle reference, or Group C, calcaneal contact reference) were recruited. We determined (1) the total number with calcaneal contact point lateral to the center of ankle and compared (2) percentage of displacement of the load-bearing axis at the level of the knee, (3) anatomical axis angle, (4) mechanical axis angle, and (5) tibial component angle.

Results

The study included 94 patients (128 knees), with the calcaneal contact reference point located lateral relative to the center of the ankle in 88.3% (113/128 knees). Using calcaneal contact point references, displacement of the load-bearing axis at the knee was greater (p < 0.0001, 38.7% vs 34.0%), and angles demonstrated significantly valgus alignment (p < 0.0001, 5.6° vs. 4.8° for anatomical axis angle, -3.0° vs. -4.2° for mechanical axis angle, and 89.9° vs. 88.6°for tibial component angle).

Conclusions

Varus alignment measured by the ankle reference method might correspond to the neutral alignment by the amount of valgus alignment indicated by the calcaneal reference. Surgeons should take this into account when preoperative planning, performing intraoperative procedures, and during postoperative evaluation.