Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate- and anterolateral ligament deficient knee with a modified iliotibial graft reduces instability more than with an intra-articular hamstring graft

Comparison of Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Iliotibial Band Augmented With Allograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft With Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis

Background

Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is one of the conventional techniques in the revision setting especially after a primary hamstring tendon graft. The use of the iliotibial band (ITB) augmented with allograft (AG) is an encouraging graft alternative for ACLR in terms of clinical and biomechanical data in the literature.

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes of BTB graft with lateral extra-articular tenodesis, modified Lemaire (BTB-LET), and an ITB graft augmented with hamstring AG (ITB-AG) in the setting of revision ACLR.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Descriptive data and clinical outcomes were prospectively collected from patients who underwent revision ACLR with either the BTB-LET or ITB-AG technique between 2012 and 2020 and who had a minimum follow-up of 2 years. The clinical outcomes were assessed by the Lysholm, Tegner, Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee evaluation form, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Return to sports, complications, and revisions were also analyzed.

Results

A total of 167 patients were included, with 106 patients in the BTB-LET group and 61 patients in the ITB-AG group. There were no significant group differences in sociodemographic characteristics; however, the mean follow-up was significantly longer in the BTB-LET compared with the ITB-AG group (52.0 vs 38.8 months, respectively; P = .0001). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcome scores; however, patients in the ITB-AG group had a higher rate of return to competitive pivoting sports (32.8% vs 17.9%; P = .0288) and a higher overall rate of return to preinjury sport (63.9% vs 47.2%; P = .0365). Complications, including revisions for meniscal or chondral lesions and retears (8 [8.3%] in the BTB-LET group and 2 [4.0%] in the ITB-AG group), were not significantly different. All retears were due to sports-related accidents.

Conclusion

In this study, ITB-AG was not different from BTB-LET in terms of functional outcomes scores but allowed better return to sport rate. Performing ITB-AG reconstruction in the setting of revision ACLR appears to be safe, effective, and associated with a satisfying return-to-sports rate.

High-grade pivot-shift phenomenon after anterior cruciate ligament injury is associated with asymmetry of lateral and medial compartment anterior tibial translation and lateral meniscus posterior horn tears

PURPOSE

To investigate whether the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon is associated with asymmetry of the lateral and medial compartment anterior tibial translation (L-ATT and M-ATT) and lateral meniscus posterior horn (LMPH) tears in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 192 consecutive patients who had complete ACL injuries between January 2019 and December 2020. Among these, 156 met the inclusion criteria. L-ATT and M-ATT were measured using preoperative weight-bearing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the differences between L-ATT and M-ATT were calculated. Thirty-five patients who demonstrated excessive differences in L-ATT and M-ATT (> 6.0 mm) were regarded as asymmetric (study group), and 36 patients with minimal or no differences in L-ATT and M-ATT (< 3.0 mm) were allocated to the control group. Demographic data, grade of the pivot-shift test, integrality of LMPH, and medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) were compared between the groups. Moreover, predictors of high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon, including asymmetry of L-ATT and M-ATT, integrity of LMPH and MMPH, time from injury to surgery, sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The difference between L-ATT and M-ATT in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group (mean ± SD: 8.4 ± 2.1 mm vs. 1.5 ± 1.0 mm, P < 0.001). A higher proportion of patients with high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon (2 + and 3 +) and LMPH tears were identified in the study group (high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon: 25/35 vs. 13/36, P = 0.003; LMPH tears: 18/35 vs. 5/36, P = 0.001). Additionally, asymmetry of L-ATT, M-ATT (odds ratio 5.8; 95% CI 1.7-19.8; P = 0.005), and LMPH tears (odds ratio 3.8; 95% CI 1.3-11.6; P = 0.018) were found to be good predictors of the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon after ACL injury, whereas MMPH tears, time from injury to surgery, sex, age, and BMI were not.

CONCLUSION

In patients with ACL injury, the high-grade pivot-shift phenomenon is associated with asymmetry between L-ATT and M-ATT, and LMPH tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis in revision ACL reconstruction does not influence the outcome of patients with low-grade anterior knee laxity

INTRODUCTION

There is limited evidence on the indications of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in revision ACLR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the LET in patients with revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2018, 78 patients who underwent revision ACLR with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity [≤ 5 mm side-to-side difference (SSD)] were included in the retrospective cohort study. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 23 patients during revision ACLR and patients were clinically examined with a minimum of 2 years after revision surgery. Postoperative failure of the revision ACLR was defined as SSD in Rolimeter^® testing ≥ 5 mm or pivot-shift grade 2/3.

RESULTS

In total, failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 11.5% (n = 9) of the cases at a mean follow-up of 28.7 ± 8.8 (24-67) months. Patients with an additional LET and revision ACLR did not show a significantly reduced failure rate (13% vs. 11%) or an improved clinical outcome according to the postoperative functional scores or pain in regards to patients with an isolated revision ACLR (Tegner 5.7 ± 1.3 vs. 5.9 ± 1.5, n.s.; IKDC 77.5 ± 16.2 vs. 80.1 ± 14.9, n.s., Lysholm 81.9 ± 14.2 vs. 83.8 ± 14.5, n.s.; VAS 1.9 ± 2.2 vs. 1.2 ± 1.7, n.s.).

CONCLUSIONS

An additional LET in patients with revision ACLR with low-grade anterior knee laxity does not influence patient-related outcomes or failure rates. Subjects with preoperative low-grade anterior knee laxity may not benefit from a LET in revision ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Contributes Little to Change In Vivo Kinematics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in combination with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) has been proposed to improve residual rotatory knee instability in patients having ACL deficiency.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose was to compare the effects of isolated ACLR (iACLR) versus LET in combination with ACLR (ACLR+LET) on in vivo kinematics during downhill running. It was hypothesized that ACLR+LET would reduce the internal rotation of the reconstructed knee in comparison with iACLR.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 18 patients with ACL deficiency were included. All participants were randomly assigned to receive ACLR+ LET or iACLR during surgery. Six months and 12 months after surgery, knee joint motion during downhill running was measured using dynamic biplane radiography and a validated registration process that matched patient-specific 3-dimensional bone models to synchronized biplane radiographs. Anterior tibial translation (ATT; positive value means "anterior translation") and tibial rotation (TR) relative to the femur were calculated for both knees. The side-to-side differences (SSDs) in kinematics were also calculated (operated knee-contralateral healthy knee). The SSD value was compared between ACLR+LET and iACLR groups using a Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

At 6 months after surgery, the SSD of ATT in patients who had undergone ACLR+LET (-1.9 ± 2.0 mm) was significantly greater than that in patients who had undergone iACLR (0.9 ± 2.3 mm) at 0% of the gait cycle (foot strike) (P = .031). There was no difference in ATT 12 months after surgery. Regarding TR, there were no differences between ACLR+LET and iACLR at either 6 months (P value range, .161-.605) or 12 months (P value range, .083-.279) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

LET in combination with ACLR significantly reduced ATT at the instant of foot strike during downhill running at 6 months after surgery. However, this effect was not significant at 12 months after surgery. The addition of LET to ACLR had no effect on TR at both 6 and 12 months after surgery.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

LET in combination with ACLR may stabilize sagittal knee motion during downhill running in the early postoperation phase, but according to this study, it has no effect on 12-month in vivo kinematics.

REGISTRATION

NCT02913404 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis in patients with revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and high-grade anterior knee instability

BACKGROUND

Additional lateral extra-articular procedures can reduce the risk of failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). There is limited evidence on the effect of lateral extra-articular procedures in revision ACL surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) in combination with revision ACLR for combined ACL graft failure and high-grade anterior knee instability.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2018, 75 patients with graft failure after primary ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability who received revision ACLR were included in the retrospective study. High-grade anterior knee instability was defined as high-grade pivot-shift or side-to-side difference of more than six millimeters in Rolimeter®-testing. An additional modified Lemaire tenodesis was performed in 59 patients during revision ACLR. Seventy-three patients were clinically examined with a minimum of two years after revision surgery.

RESULTS

Failure of the revision ACLR occurred in 8.2% (n = 6) of the cases. LET lead to significant decreased failure rates (five percent vs. 21%, p = .045) and decreased incidence of a positive pivot-shift in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior knee instability in comparison to patients without LET. Also, postoperative functional scores were significantly increased in the group of additional LET.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional LET in patients with revision ACLR and high-grade anterior instability significantly reduces the risk of failure of revision ACLR, the incidence of pivot-shift and increases postoperative functional outcome.