Closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy, a reliable procedure for osteoarthritic varus knee

Higher conversion rate to knee arthroplasty in female patients following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

Most studies about medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) reported outcomes without focusing on gender differences. Therefore, the study compared the long-term survival rate and postoperative subjective knee function after HTO in female versus male patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

The data of three cohorts with long-term outcomes were analysed (n = 245; 32% females; age: 49 ± 7 years; Kellgren Lawrence Grade I 6.1%, II 32.7%, III 42.4%; IV 18.8%). The minimum follow-up was at least 6 years or an earlier conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The gender-specific survival rate after HTO was calculated after 5 and 10 years and compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the logrank test. Baseline characteristics and subjective knee function (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC]/Lysholm) were analysed between both genders.

RESULTS

Forty of 78 (51.3%) women and 41 of 167 men (24.5%) underwent TKA. HTO survival in females was significantly lower (p = 0.0010). The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 85.9% and 62.6% for females and 93.4% and 77.7% for males. In females and males, from preoperative to the last follow-up, the IKDC (43 ± 15 to 58 ± 17; 47 ± 14 to 67 ± 18) and the Lysholm (42 ± 18 to 72 ± 18; 55 ± 22 to 77 ± 23) improved significantly (all p < 0.0001). Females had significantly lower preoperative and postoperative IKDC (p = 0.0438; p = 0.0035) and Lysholm scores (p = 0.0002; p = 0.0323). But the absolute improvements of the IKDC and Lysholm were not significantly different between genders.

CONCLUSIONS

Females had higher conversion rates to TKA and lower knee function at the last follow-up. However, preoperative knee function was lower in females and the absolute improvement following HTO was similar for both genders. In general, females benefit from HTO to treat medial knee arthritis, and TKA could be postponed for half of female patients for more than 10 years. However, surgeons must be aware of the described inferior outcomes in females for realistic patient expectation management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: An old-fashioned technique? Survival, clinical and radiological outcomes of a case series analysis

INTRODUCTION

Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW-HTO) is a surgical option for active patients with medial knee pain and mild-moderate osteoarthritis with varus limb deformity. Despite its good reported results, this technique has been losing popularity. The aim of this study was to analyse the survival rate, clinical functional outcomes and radiological results of CW-HTO.

METHODS

It is a retrospective case series study. Seventy patients with primary knee osteoarthritis, operated on between 2010 and 2020 in a single Spanish tertiary hospital using the CW-HTO technique and with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were analysed.

RESULTS

Survival rate was 87,6% and 75,5% after a follow-up of 5 and 10 years respectively. Functional outcomes were good-to-excellent (KSS 77.7/100 and OKS 35.6/48) and good pain control (VAS 3.9/10) and high satisfaction (7.2/10) were achieved. Limb varus malalignment was significantly corrected (mean postoperative HKA angle 177,6° and MPTA 90,7°). However, 30% of patients presented hypocorrection, which was associated with inferior survival, functionality and satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

CW-HTO technique can be useful for patients with knee osteoarthritis and varus limb. It allows to correct varus malalignment while achieving good-to-excellent functional outcomes, good pain control, high patient satisfaction and acceptable medium-long term survival rate. However, it is associated with a non-negligible risk of hypocorrection or medial hinge disruption.

[Translated article] Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy: An old-fashioned technique? Survival, clinical and radiological outcomes of a case series analysis

INTRODUCTION

Closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW-HTO) is a surgical option for active patients with medial knee pain and mild-moderate osteoarthritis with varus limb deformity. Despite its good reported results, this technique has been losing popularity. The aim of this study was to analyse the survival rate, clinical functional outcomes and radiological results of CW-HTO.

METHODS

It is a retrospective case series study. Seventy patients with primary knee osteoarthritis, operated on between 2010 and 2020 in a single Spanish tertiary hospital using the CW-HTO technique and with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were analysed.

RESULTS

Survival rate was 87.6% and 75.5% after a follow-up of 5 and 10 years respectively. Functional outcomes were good-to-excellent (KSS 77.7/100 and OKS 35.6/48) and good pain control (VAS 3.9/10) and high satisfaction (7.2/10) were achieved. Limb varus malalignment was significantly corrected (mean postoperative HKA angle 177.6° and MPTA 90.7°). However, 30% of patients presented hypocorrection, which was associated with inferior survival, functionality and satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

CW-HTO technique can be useful for patients with knee osteoarthritis and varus limb. It allows to correct varus malalignment while achieving good-to-excellent functional outcomes, good pain control, high patient satisfaction and acceptable medium-long term survival rate. However, it is associated with a non-negligible risk of hypocorrection or medial hinge disruption.

Difference in Correction Power between Hybrid Lateral Closed-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy was Associated with Severity of Varus Deformity and Different Hinge Distance from Center of Deformity

Hybrid lateral closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HBHTO) carries certain advantages over medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO). We investigated the potential difference in the required correction angle between HBHTO and OWHTO to achieve an equal amount of whole lower-extremity alignment correction, retrospectively analyzing the preoperative plain radiographic images of 100 patients. The medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), hip-knee-ankle axis (HKA), length of the tibia, width of the tibial plateau, length of the lower limb (leg length), and location of the center of deformity (CD) were measured. Differences in the required correction angle at the hinge point between the two techniques (CAD) were compared, and correlation analysis was performed to reveal the influential factors. The mean difference in CAD between HBHTO and OWHTO was 0.78 ± 0.22 (0.4~1.5)°, and mean WBL position change per correction angle was 3.9 ± 0.3 (3.0~4.6)% in HBHTO and 4.1 ± 0.3 (3.1~4.7)% in OWHTO. Correlation analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between CAD and HKA. mLDFA, JLCA, MPTA, leg length, OWCD, HBCD, and HCD were also significantly correlated with CAD. HBHTO required a 5.6% larger correction angle at the hinge point to achieve the same amount of alignment correction as OWHTO.

Small medial proximal tibial angle is a radiographic finding strongly associated with less coronal alignment correction under valgus stress in medial knee osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The degree to which varus knees can be corrected manually is important when considering total versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The primary aim was to clarify the relationship between the degree of coronal alignment correction and radiographic parameters involved in UKA prognosis using preoperative full-length lower extremity valgus stress radiography. The secondary aim was to identify the factors affecting alignment correction.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 115 knees with medial osteoarthritis that underwent knee osteotomy or arthroplasty. Percent mechanical axis without valgus stress (%MA: neutral, 50%; varus, <50% and valgus, >50%), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, lateral bowing femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle, medial and lateral joint space width (LJSW) and medial femoral and tibial joint osteophyte size were measured using preoperative full-length weight-bearing radiographs. Correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were used to assess associations between parameters and %MA with valgus stress or amount of %MA change (%MA with valgus stress minus %MA without valgus stress).

RESULTS

%MA with valgus stress was correlated with all radiographic parameters. %MA change was correlated with parameters except for MPTA and LJSW. Multiple regression analyses showed that %MA without valgus stress and MPTA were associated with both %MA with valgus stress and %MA change. When %MA with valgus stress was set at 30%, 40% and 50%, MPTA cutoff values were 81.6°, 83.5° and 84.9°, and cutoffs for %MA without valgus stress were 10.7%, 17.1% and 25.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Small MPTA is strongly associated with less alignment correction under valgus stress in varus knees. The finding is useful in surgical planning, especially to avoid undercorrection with UKA when valgus stress radiographs are unavailable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

20-Year Outcomes of High Tibial Osteotomy: Determinants of Survival and Functional Outcome

BACKGROUND

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a successful joint-preserving procedure for the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis. Long-term survivorship of HTO ranges from 40% to 85%. There are consistent factors that predict failure.

PURPOSE

To determine the 20-year survival of HTO and identify predictors of failure.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients with medial bone-on-bone arthritis were prospectively studied to provide long-term patient-reported outcome measures after lateral closing-wedge HTO and determine the time to failure. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty (total knee arthroplasty or unicompartmental knee arthroplasty) or revision HTO.

RESULTS

At 20 years, HTO survival was determined in 95 patients, and 5 were lost to follow-up. The overall survivorship of HTO at 20 years was 44%. The significant factors that were associated with better survivorship were age <55 years, body mass index <30, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score >45. These factors were used to define the favorable candidates. In the favorable candidates, survivorship was 100% at 5 years, after which there was a gradual decline to 62% survival at 20 years. Of those with HTO survival, 32 of 33 (97%) reported satisfaction with surgery, with a mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain score of 91 and Activities of Daily Living score of 97.

CONCLUSION

HTO is a successful surgical option to treat medial compartment osteoarthritis and prevent the need for arthroplasty in young patients. The most suitable candidates for HTO are aged <55 years, are not obese, and have not progressed to severe symptomatic disability.

The reimbursement system can influence the treatment choice and favor joint replacement versus other less invasive solutions in patients affected by osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess how physicians perceive the role of the reimbursement system and its potential influence in affecting their treatment choice in the management of patients affected by osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

A survey was administered to 283 members of SIAGASCOT (Italian Society of Arthroscopy, Knee, Upper Limb, Sport, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies), a National scientific orthopaedic society. The survey presented multiple choice questions on the access allowed by the current Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRG) system to all necessary options to treat patients affected by OA and on the influence toward prosthetic solutions versus other less invasive options.

RESULTS

Almost 70% of the participants consider that the current DRG system does not allow access to all necessary options to best treat patients affected by OA. More than half of the participants thought that the current DRG system favors the choice of prosthetic solutions (55%) and that it can contribute to the increase in prosthetic implantation at the expense of less invasive solutions (54%). The sub-analyses based on different age groups, professional roles, and places of work allowed to evaluate the response in each specific category, confirming the findings for all investigated aspects.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey documented that the majority of physicians consider that the reimbursement system can influence the treatment choice when managing OA patients. The current DRG system was perceived as unbalanced in favor of the choice of the prosthetic solution, which could contribute to the increase in prosthetic implantation at the expense of other less invasive options for OA management.

Comparing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and High Tibial Osteotomy for Isolated Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis

»

Both unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) allow for compartment-specific intervention on an arthritic knee joint that preserves bone stock and native soft tissue compared to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Both operations give a more natural feeling with native proprioception compared with a TKA.

»

HTO is better suited in patients who are younger (<55 years-of-age), have a body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2, high activity requirements, mechanical malalignment, asymmetric varus, isolated anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency, need for multiplanar correction, and a preference for joint preserving interventions. Recent data suggest that age (>55 years-of-age) should not solely contraindicate a HTO.

»

UKA may be chosen in patients who are older (>55 years-of-age), low activity requirements, have a BMI <40 kg/m2, severe osteoarthritis with significant joint space narrowing, acceptable coronal alignment, symmetric varus, and patient preference for arthroplasty.

Less risk of conversion to total knee arthroplasty without significant clinical and survivorship difference for opening-wedge high tibial osteotomies in varus knee deformities at 10-year minimum follow-up compared to closing-wedge high tibial osteotomies

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and survivorship at minimum 10-year follow-up of patients undergoing primary valgisation high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial osteoarthritis (OA), treated by Opening-Wedge HTO (OW-HTO) or Closing-Wedge HTO (CW-HTO).

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients presenting to a single institution undergoing HTO for isolated medial compartment OA. Two hundred and twenty three HTOs for isolated medial tibio-femoral OA were performed between January 2002 and December 2010. Patients were eligible if they had minimum 10-year follow-up and received either a CW or OW-HTO. Fifteen (6.7%) patients died and twenty-five (11.2%) were lost to follow-up. One hundred and eighty three (82.1%) patients were included in the final analysis and divided into two groups: OW-HTO (96/183; 52.4%) and CW-HTO (87/183; 47.6%). Range of motion, KSS, KOOS scores, and conversion to TKA rate were analyzed between groups. Both groups were comparable regarding age, arthrosis stage, gender, ASA score and BMI at the time of HTO. Survival analysis was conducted with re-intervention for TKA as the end point.

RESULTS

At the time of HTO, mean age was 55 years ± 7.9 (27-73.9) with 72.7% of patients being male. The mean follow-up was 13.3 years ± 2.7 (10-19). Sixty-four (34.9%) patients underwent TKA at a mean delay of 9.3 years ± 3 (3-16). The conversion to TKA rate was significantly higher in the CW-HTO group versus the OW-HTO group: 42.5% (37/87) versus 28.1% (27/96) (p = 0.04). The survival at 15-year follow-up was 59.2% in the OW-HTO group versus 54.6% in the CW-HTO group (n.s.). At 13-year follow-up, KSS Function score was significantly better in the OW-HTO (90.9 versus 82.4; p = 0.007). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the KOOS score, KSS Knee Score and complication rate.

CONCLUSION

At mean follow-up of 13 years, no significant clinical and survivorship difference was observed between the two groups. The conversion to TKA was significantly lower following OW-HTO. Minor correction was associated with risk of requiring subsequent TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, IV.

Surgeons' expectations of osteotomies around the knee

INTRODUCTION

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a valid and joint preserving surgical technique to treat medial degenerative osteoarthritis (OA) in young and active patients. A recent study shows that patients' expectations of osteotomy around the knee are high, but OA progression and potential conversion to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were underestimated. The aim of this study was to investigate surgeons' expectations of HTO and to compare the results to the patients' expectations and actual outcomes reported in the literature.

METHODS

461 surgeons were questioned online using the 'Hospital for Special Surgery Knee Surgery Expectations Survey (HFSS-KSES)' and a ten-item non-validated questionnaire to investigate the expectations of HTO. Two subgroups were formed to investigate differences regarding the surgeons' experience. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics.

RESULTS

Surgeons' expectations of HTO were rated between very and little important with pain reduction being the most important item on the HFSS-KSES. Furthermore, 'improving the ability to walk', 'to perform daily activities', 'having confidence in the knee', and 'avoiding future degeneration' were rated of high importance. An important difference regarding the experience was the lower expectations on delay/prevention of TKA of less-experienced surgeons.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons' expectations of HTO are high but nevertheless different to the patients' expectations reported in the literature. Also, expectations for the delay/prevention of TKA differed regarding the experience of surgeons. While pain reduction represents one of the most important items for surgeons and patients, the expected outcome regarding the delay/prevention of a TKA and returning to sports differs to the patients' expectations and to the actual outcome reported in the literature. This should be considered when performing the preoperative informed consent.

Considerations of the Posterior Tibial Slope in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Scoping Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The significance of posterior tibial slope (PTS) in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction has been increasingly recognized in recent years. The purpose of this article is to review the biomechanical and clinical studies of PTS in conjunction with ACL injuries, providing an evidence-based approach for the evaluation and management of this patient population.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several biomechanical and clinical studies suggest that PTS > 12° may be considered with increased strain on the native ACL fibers (or reconstructed graft) and greater anterior tibial translation, predisposing patients to a recurrent ACL injury. The increased rates of ACL injury and graft failure seen in those with increased PTS have garnered attention to diagnose and surgically address increased PTS in the revision ACL setting; however, the role of a slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in primary ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) has yet to be defined. Various HTO techniques to decrease PTS during revision ACL-R have demonstrated promising outcomes, though conclusions are limited by the multifactorial nature of revision surgery and concomitant procedures performed. Recent evidence suggests that increased PTS is a risk factor for failure following ACL-R, which may be mitigated by a slope-reducing HTO. Further investigation is needed to elucidate abnormal PTS values and to determine appropriate indications for a slope-reducing HTO in primary ACL-R.

A 2021 consensus statement on osteotomies around the knee by the UK Knee Osteotomy consensus Group (KOG)

BACKGROUND

There are significant deficiencies in the evidence base of modern-day osteotomy which result in significant variation in practice between surgeons. The purpose of this statement was to develop a consensus statement on the practice of osteotomy so that a more standardized approach to the indications, surgical technique, and postoperative care could be outlined. The article is also intended to educate and inform the practice of individuals who are early in their experience and/or clinical practice.

METHOD

A group of 29 specialist knee surgeons who regularly perform osteotomy was convened to form the Knee Osteotomy consensus Group (KOG). Consensus was determined utilizing the consensus group technique described by List. A total of 37 questions were asked covering all aspects of clinical practice.

RESULTS

20 statements were generated and debated until a criterion level of 70% was met.

CONCLUSIONS

Consensus was achieved regarding 20 statements concerning Indications for surgery, decision making, surgical planning, technique, post-operative assessment and recovery.

Good long-term survival and patient-reported outcomes after high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis

The lateral closing and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy can correct a varus malalignment of the knee caused by medial compartment osteoarthritis. These procedures have produced great short-term and mid-term results. As no systematic review has examined their long-term results yet, the goal of this article was to compare the results of all articles about lateral closing and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomies, published after the year 2000, with a mean follow-up of more than 10 years. A systematic search of the Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane databases resulted in the inclusion of 30 articles. All these studies combined examined the results of 7087 high tibial osteotomies in a total of 6636 patients after a mean follow-up of more than 10 years. Primary outcome measures were the survival rate of the osteotomy, functional scores, patient satisfaction and pain scores. Secondary outcome measures were alignment correction and the identification of factors influencing the survival of the osteotomy. The 5-year, 10-year, 15-year and 20-year survival rates, respectively, ranged from 86 to 100%, 64-97.6%, 44-93.2% and 46-85.1%. The subjective scoring systems showed an improvement postoperatively that was maintained until final follow-up. The anatomical and mechanical tibiofemoral axis were, respectively, corrected to a mean of 7.3°-13.8° of valgus and 0.6°-4° of valgus. The results of the articles evaluating the influence of potential risk factors were contradictory. Despite the low quality of the available evidence, the lateral closing and medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy seem to remain valid long-term treatment options for patients with painful varus malalignment caused by isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. The available results indicate that the need for arthroplasty could be delayed for more than 15 years in the majority of patients. However, higher-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings. As a systematic review is assigned a level of evidence equivalent to the lowest level of evidence used from the analyzed manuscripts, the level of evidence of this systematic review is IV.

Long-Term Survivorship of Closed-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Severe Knee Osteoarthritis: Outcomes After 10 to 37 Years

Background:

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) was developed as a joint-preserving procedure to treat relatively young patients with isolated medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA). Long-term survivorship after HTO is important to determine whether patients will need additional surgery.

Purpose:

To determine the long-term (>35-year) survivorship and prognostic factors for closed-wedge HTO (CWHTO) for severe medial OA.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent CWHTO for severe medial knee OA between 1983 and 2009 at our institution, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine (Nagoya, Japan). Patient demographics, follow-up period, and pre- and postoperative femoral-tibial angle (FTA) were reviewed. The patients or the relatives of the patients were interviewed by telephone to record postoperative status, including conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Results:

Of the 74 CWHTO procedures performed, we evaluated 56 procedures in 45 patients (mean age at time of surgery, 56.8 years). The mean follow-up period was 17.1 years. Nine knees (16.1%) underwent conversion to TKA. The mean time to TKA conversion was 15.6 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a 10-year survival rate of 90.1%, a 15-year rate of 83.8%, a 20-year rate of 75.9%, and a 35-year rate of 75.9%. Log-rank test showed that age ≥55 years (P = .044), body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m² (P = .0016), and preoperative FTA <185° (P = .0034) were risk factors associated with TKA conversion. Multivariate analyses adjusted for age and sex identified BMI ≥25 kg/m² (hazard ratio [HR], 13.4; 95% CI, 1.7-106.9; P = .014) and preoperative FTA <185° (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.1-16.6; P = .04) as risk factors associated with TKA conversion.

Conclusion:

The survival rate of CWHTO for severe medial knee OA was 90.1% at 10 years, 83.8% at 15 years, and 75.9% at 20 years and 35 years. Furthermore, a BMI ≥25 kg/m² and FTA <185° were the independent risk factors associated with TKA conversion after CWHTO.

Long-term survival rate of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy with high valgus correction: a 15-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

The influence of closing wedge high tibial osteotomy (CW-HTO) with high valgus correction on its survival is unclear. This study aimed to conduct a 15-year follow-up cohort study to estimate the long-term survival rate of CW-HTO. Factors related to poor outcomes were investigated.

METHODS

A total of 159 knees in 123 patients were followed up, and 120 knees in 96 patients were enrolled for statistical analysis. Femorotibial angles were measured by standing anterior-posterior radiographs of the knee. Clinical objective evaluation was performed by the Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score of the knee, and scores lower than 70 points defined the poor result (PR) group. The survival rate of OW-HTO was estimated. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for PR and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

RESULTS

A total of 16 knees in 15 patients (13.3%) underwent TKA 14.0 ± 4.8 (4-20) years after CW-HTO. The 5-year survival rate was 99.2%, 10-year was 96.7%, 15-year was 92.5%, and 86.7% at final follow-up (17.9 years). Based on the JOA score, 44 patients (35.8%) belonged to the PR group, and their risk factors were obesity (p = 0.018), low femorotibial angle (p = 0.019), low JOA score (p = 0.040), low knee extension angle (p = 0.045), and low knee flexion angle (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

The 15-year survival rate of CW-HTO was 92.5%. While higher scores of objective outcomes were kept over long-term follow-up, the risk factors for a worsening score or TKA conversion were obesity and severity of preoperative knee symptoms.

High Tibial Osteotomy for Varus Deformity of the Knee

High tibial osteotomy is a powerful technique to treat symptomatic varus deformity of the knee and is successful when properly indicated and performed. Indications include varus deformity with medial compartment osteoarthritis, cartilage or meniscus pathology. Several techniques exist to correct symptomatic varus malalignment along with concomitant procedures to restore cartilage or meniscus injuries. Evidence supporting high tibial osteotomy for symptomatic medial compartment pathology exists, which provides a durable solution for joint preservation. This review will discuss the indications, techniques, and outcomes for high tibial osteotomies used in the treatment of symptomatic varus deformity of the knee.

Osteotomy Around the Knee: The Surgical Treatment of Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis causes joint pain and functional disorder, of which knee osteoarthritis is the most common. Nowadays, clinically effective treatments mainly include conservative treatment, arthroplasty, and osteotomy. However, conservative treatment only offers symptomatic relief and arthroplasty is limited to the patients with a moderate to severe degree of osteoarthritis. For relatively young patients who require greater knee preservation, a surgical treatment with low operation trauma and revision rate is needed. Osteotomy around the knee, based on the notion of “knee preservation,” has been chosen as an alternative surgical treatment. Cutting and realigning the bones corrects the mechanical line of lower limb force bearing. As such, osteotomy around the knee retains normal anatomical structure and obtains good functional recovery of the knee joint. The techniques of osteotomy around the knee includes anti‐varus deformity and anti‐valgus deformity osteotomy, aiming to reallocate the force bearing in the compartment of the knee joint. By choosing the surgical section of the lower limbs, the osteotomy around the knee can achieve the correction of mechanical axis, such as the high tibial osteotomy (HTO), proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO), and distal femur osteotomy (DFO). Numerous modified techniques have been developed to meet the demands of patients based on traditional methods. These modified osteotomy have their own advantages and indications. This paper aims to guide clinical treatment by reviewing different types of osteotomies, and their effects, that have been studied and applied widely in clinical practices.

Good clinical outcomes and return to sports after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate preoperative sports participation and postoperative clinical outcomes including a return to sports (RTS) after hybrid closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Characteristic of Hybrid CWHTO was defined as extra-articular lateral closed and medial open wedge osteotomy.

METHODS

The patients who underwent hybrid CWHTO from January 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed and divided them into sports and non-sports groups. The preoperative demographic and radiographic characteristics were compared in both groups. And the clinical outcomes including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), Lysholm score, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score, and RTS in the sports group were also investigated. Statistical analysis was performed for comparisons among the preoperative factors between the two groups. Influence of sports impact and bone union of fibular osteotomy was also statistically investigated for RTS.

RESULTS

Of the 161 knees (129 patients; 46 males, 83 females), 20 knees (16 patients; 13 males, 3 females; 12.3%) belonged to sports group. Although there were no significant differences regarding the age and radiographic parameters, there were significant differences in the body mass index and proportion of males between both groups. The JOA, VAS, Lysholm, and UCLA activity scores significantly improved after surgery. RTS was 80% at a mean duration of 7.2 ± 3.1 months. RTS in the high-impact sports group was significantly lower than that in the low-impact sports group (high-impact 60% vs. low-impact 100%, p = 0.043). There was no significant difference in RTS regarding bone union after fibular osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes including RTS were satisfactory in patients with hybrid CWHTO.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Effect of osteoarthritis severity on survival and clinical outcomes after high tibial osteotomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of osteoarthritis severity on clinical outcomes using the 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS2011) and survival rates after closed wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, KSS2011 questionnaires were mailed to patients who had undergone CWHTO between January 1991 and December 2011. The completed questionnaires returned by the patients were analyzed. Preoperative osteoarthritis severity was evaluated by Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade. KSS2011 was compared between the K-L grade groups. To determine the effect of K-L grade for revision surgery, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created using the need for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) as the endpoint to estimate the probability of failure.

RESULTS

There were 16, 81, and 47 knees with preoperative K-L 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Among the KSS2011 sub-scores, the symptom score showed significant differences between the groups (p = 0.006). However, no significant difference was found regarding satisfaction, expectation, and functional activity scores. No significant difference in the symptom score was found between the K-L 2 and 3 groups (p > 0.05). Eighteen knees were treated with TKA at a mean of 9 years after CWHTO. Using the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, the K-L 4 group showed a significantly higher rate of total knee arthroplasty conversion than the K-L 2 and 3 groups (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Osteoarthritis severity affects clinical outcomes and survival rates during long-term follow-up after CWHTO. Surgeons should consider the preoperative osteoarthritis grade for long-term outcomes when considering CWHTO for patients with varus knees.