Novel and reproducible technique coping with intraoperative anchor pullout during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Cement Augmentation of Suture Anchor During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Case of Proximal Humeral Bone Deficiency Due to Osteoporosis

One of the technical challenges during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is bone deficiency in proximal humerus to get adequate fixation of suture anchors. The typical scenarios that result in bone deficiency at rotator cuff footprint are older individuals, females, osteoporosis, and revision rotator cuff repairs with failed anchors from previous surgery. One of the ways to secure fixation of suture anchors in deficient bone is augmentation with polymethyl methacrylate cement. We present a stepwise technique of cement augmentation of suture anchor during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair to achieve secure fixation of suture anchor and avoid spillage of cement in the subacromial space.

Risk Factors and Corresponding Management for Suture Anchor Pullout during Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

INTRODUCTION

Due to the aging of the population, the incidence of rotator cuff tears is growing. For rotator cuff repair, arthroscopic suture-anchor repair has gradually replaced open transosseous repair, so suture anchors are now considered increasingly important in rotator cuff tear reconstruction. There are some but limited studies of suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. However, there is no body of knowledge in this area, which makes it difficult for clinicians to predict the risk of anchor pullout comprehensively and manage it accordingly.

METHODS

The literature search included rotator cuff repair as well as anchor pullout strength. A review of the literature was performed including all articles published in PubMed until September 2021. Articles of all in vitro biomechanical and clinical trial levels in English were included. After assessing all abstracts (n = 275), the full text and the bibliographies of the relevant articles were analyzed for the questions posed (n = 80). Articles including outcomes without the area of interest were excluded (n = 22). The final literature research revealed 58 relevant articles. Narrative synthesis was undertaken to bring together the findings from studies included in this review.

RESULT

Based on the presented studies, the overall incidence of anchor pullout is not low, and the incidence of intraoperative anchor pullout is slightly higher than in the early postoperative period. The risk factors for anchor pullout are mainly related to bone quality, insertion depth, insertion angle, size of rotator cuff tear, preoperative corticosteroid injections, anchor design, the materials used to produce anchors, etc. In response to the above issues, we have introduced and evaluated management techniques. They include changing the implant site of anchors, cement augmentation for suture anchors, increasing the number of suture limbs, using all-suture anchors, using an arthroscopic transosseous knotless anchor, the Buddy anchor technique, Steinmann pin anchoring, and transosseous suture repair technology.

DISCUSSION

However, not many of the management techniques have been widely used in clinical practice. Most of them come from in vitro biomechanical studies, so in vivo randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to see if they can help patients in the long run.

Transosseous repair with a cortical implant for greater tubercle cyst-related rotator cuff tear results in good clinical outcomes, but significant implant migration

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether an arthroscopic transosseous technique (ATO) with cortical implants is effective for rotator cuff tear (RCT) repair in patients with cysts of the greater tuberosity (GTC).

METHODS

Patients treated with the ATO technique between January 2013 and October 2017 were evaluated. Inclusion criteria were patients treated for both cyst-related and non-cyst-related RCTs and patients with a moderate-sized tear (1-3 cm) according to the DeOrio and Cofield classification. A total of 39 patients were separated into two groups: Group 1 (n = 16) patients with cyst-associated RCT, and Group 2 (n = 23) patients with no cyst. Implant pull-out and migration were evaluated radiologically on standard antero-posterior shoulder radiographs and rotator cuff re-tear was assessed on magnetic resonance images at the final follow-up examination. Group 1 patients were separated into two subgroups according to cyst size (cyst < 5 mm and cyst ≥ 5 mm) and subgroup analysis was performed. Clinical assessment was performed using a visual analog scale, the Constant score and Oxford shoulder score.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 33.7 ± 11.7 months. The mean cyst size was 5.4 ± 1.5 mm. There was no significant difference in re-tear rates between the cystic and non-cystic groups. The mean implant migration distance was 3.0 ± 2.2 mm in patients with a RCT -related cyst and 0.7 ± 0.8 mm in those without a cyst. A statistically significant difference was found between the groups (p = 0.002). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in respect of clinical scores. No implant failure was observed.

CONCLUSION

The ATO method performed with a cortical implant in RCTs resulted in satisfactory recovery and clinical outcomes in the short to medium term with low failure rates. While no implant failures were observed, implant migration was associated with cyst presence. Therefore, judicious use is advocated in the choice of transosseous fixation for cyst-related RCTs and patients should be informed of the possibility of implant migration.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.