Combination of anterior tibial and femoral tunnels makes the signal intensity of antero-medial graft higher in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

No Difference in Graft Signal Intensity on MRI or Clinical Outcome Between Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With and Without Suture Augmentation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture augmentation (SA) through clinical evaluations, monitoring of complications, and evaluation of early graft remodeling using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

Data of participants who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR using hamstring tendon autografts, with a minimum 2-year follow-up, were retrospectively reviewed. Participants undergoing ACLR with SA were propensity-matched with those without SA. Postoperative clinical evaluations, including Lysholm and Tegner activity scores, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation scores, KT-1000 side-to-side difference for knee stability at a 2-year follow-up, and complications, were recorded. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated for IKDC scores. The anteromedial bundle graft was categorized into distal, middle, and proximal regions on the 6-month and 1-year postoperative MRI. The signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) of each region of interest was calculated to evaluate the graft signal intensity, which was compared between the two groups using Welch's t-test.

RESULTS

Fifty-three participants were included in each group. No significant differences were observed between the non-SA and SA groups in the Lysholm scores (96.6 ± 6.2; 95.3 ± 5.8, P = 0.25), Tegner activity scores (4.8 ± 1.4; 5.0 ± 1.3, P = 0.49), IKDC scores (90.4 ± 10.8; 87.1 ± 12.9, P = 0.15), percentage of patients meeting the MCID (94.3%; 83.0%, P = 0.12), or postoperative KT-1000 side-to-side difference (0.9 ±1.2; 0.7 ± 1.8 mm, P = 0.56). One (1.8%) and two (3.7%) cases of re-tears occurred in the non-SA and SA groups, respectively; no other complications occurred. The postoperative SNQ measurements revealed no significant differences in signal changes in all regions of the grafts between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirmed no difference in graft signal intensity on MRI or clinical outcome between ACLR with and without SA at the 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective, comparative study.

Association Between MRI Signal Intensity of the Repaired Lateral Meniscus and Residual Anterolateral Knee Laxity After ACL Reconstruction

Background

Anterolateral knee laxity (ALLx) has been linked to tears of the lateral meniscus (LM) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

Purpose

To investigate the longitudinal relationship between the signal intensity (SI) of the repaired LM on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and residual ALLx after ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

Included were 87 patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR and lateral meniscal repair (mean age, 23.5 years; body mass index, 23.7 kg/m2; 56 women) at a single institution between 2010 and 2019. Proton density-weighted (PDW) and T2-weighted (T2W) MRI was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, and the SI ratio (SIR) was calculated as (SI of the repaired LM)/(SI of the posterior cruciate ligament). At the 12-month follow-up, ALLx was evaluated using the pivot-shift test; an International Knee Documentation Committee grade ≥1 indicated residual ALLx.

Results

Overall, 12 patients (13.8%) exhibited ALLx at 12 months postoperatively. At 3 months postoperatively, the SIR on PDW images (SIR-PDW) was significantly higher in patients with ALLx versus those without ALLx (1.98 ± 0.77 vs 1.49 ± 0.52, respectively; P = .007); there was no difference in the SIR on T2W images between the groups. SIR-PDW at 3 months postoperatively was correlated negatively with patient age (r = -0.308, P = .004). When patients were stratified into a younger (≤22 years; n = 53; ALLx = 7 [13.2%]) and an older (>22 years; n = 34; ALLx = 5 [14.7%]) group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for SIR-PDW in the younger group were statistically significant for predicting the prevalence of ALLx at all follow-up times (AUCs, 0.733-0.788) with optimal cutoff values of 2.00 at 3 months, 1.50 at 6 months, and 1.50 at 12 months. Logistic regression analysis revealed that if younger patients consistently had higher SIR-PDW values than the cutoff values, they were more likely to have residual ALLx (odds ratios, 10.24-23.57).

Conclusion

For younger patients who underwent both ACLR and lateral meniscal repair, higher MRI SI of the repaired LM was associated with a higher prevalence of residual ALLx.

Graft impingement increases anterior cruciate ligament graft signal more than acute graft bending angle: magnetic resonance imaging-based study in outside-in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

In this study, the relationship between patient-specific geometric factors and tunnel placement in graft impingement was identified by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) grafts.

METHODS

Ninety-two patients, who were treated between 2014 and 2020, were included retrospectively. These patients underwent primary remnant-preserving outside-in ACL reconstruction (ACLR) and were followed up with postoperative MRI at least one year after surgery. Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) were used to analyze tibial and femoral tunnel positions. Postoperative MRI was performed, at 32.8 ± 17.5 months after surgery, to evaluate the graft signal intensity, the ACL/posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) ratio (APR), ACL/muscle ratio (AMR), tunnel positions, and graft impingement. Clinical and stability outcomes were analyzed using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores, Lysholm scores, and side-to-side differences (SS-D).

RESULTS

The mean APR and AMR of the proximal third of the grafts were significantly lower than those of the middle third of the grafts (p = 0.017 and p = 0.045, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis showed that there was a negative association between the mean APR and AMR of entire intra-articular ACL graft and the distance from the anterior end of the intercondylar roof to the center of the tibial tunnel in the sagittal plane (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) and the notch width index (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). No significant correlations were found between tunneling and geometric factors, and clinical scores or SS-D.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft impingement on the anterior tibial tunnel relative to the end of the intercondylar roof and narrow notch was a more significant contributing factor on increased signal intensities of the ACL graft, compared with the acute femoral bending angle in remnant-preserving outside-in ACLR. Therefore, surgeons should focus on intercondylar notch anatomy during tibial tunnel placement to avoid roof impingement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Revision and Primary ACL Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis With 3-5 Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

There are limited studies designed by matching related factors to compare clinical outcomes and return to sport (RTS) between patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (R-ACLR) and primary ACLR (P-ACLR).

PURPOSE

(1) To compare the outcomes between R-ACLR and P-ACLR in a matched-pair analysis with 3- to 5-year follow-up and (2) to evaluate patient-reported factors for not returning to preinjury-level sport.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Patients who underwent R-ACLR between September 2016 and November 2018 were propensity matched by age, sex, body mass index, passive anterior tibial subluxation, and generalized hypermobility in a 1:1 ratio to patients who underwent P-ACLR during the same period. By combining in person follow-up at 2 years postoperatively and telemedicine interview at the final follow-up (January 2022), knee stability and clinical scores were compared, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner. Status of RTS was requested, specifically whether the patient returned to preinjury level of sport. Patient-reported reasons for not returning were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 63 matched pairs in the present study. Knee stability was similar in terms of KT-2000 arthrometer, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test results between the groups at 2 years of follow-up. At the final follow-up, no significant difference was found between groups for postoperative clinical scores (IKDC, Tegner, and Lysholm) (P > .05). There was a significant difference in total RTS: 53 (84.1%) in the P-ACLR cohort and 41 (65.1%) in the R-ACLR cohort (P = .014). No significant difference was shown in terms of RTS at the same level: 35 (55.6%) in P-ACLR and 31 (49.2%) in R-ACLR (P = .476). Significantly more patients showed fear of reinjury: 26 of 32 (81.3%) in the R-ACLR group as compared with 15 of 28 (53.5%) in the P-ACLR group (P < .021).

CONCLUSION

R-ACLR resulted in similar clinical scores (IKDC, Tegner, and Lysholm) but significantly lower RTS versus P-ACLR at 3 to 5 years of follow-up. Fear of reinjury was the most common factor that caused sport changes in patients with R-ACLR.

Association Between Early Postoperative Graft Signal Intensity and Residual Knee Laxity After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) graft signal intensity is associated with graft damage after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, little is known about the relationship between graft signal intensity and residual laxity of the reconstructed knee based on patient age.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

To evaluate the relationship between graft signal intensity and residual laxity in younger and older patients who underwent ACLR. We hypothesized that higher graft signal intensity would be associated with reduced postoperative knee stability.

Study Design:

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 192 patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR were recruited. Proton density–weighted and T2-weighted MRI was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, and the signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles was measured as the graft signal intensity reference values. At 12 months after surgery, if the KT-1000 arthrometer measurement exhibited a side-to-side difference of ≥2 mm, the patient was determined as having anterior knee laxity. Rotatory knee laxity was defined as a positive pivot shift with International Knee Documentation Committee grade ≥1. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the SIR in patients with and without residual laxity. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between demographic parameters and the SIR. Based on receiver operating characteristic curves, the optimal SIR cutoff values to predict residual laxity were calculated, and logistic regression analysis was conducted.

Results:

Of 192 patients, 26 (13.5%) had anterior knee laxity, and 20 (10.4%) had rotatory knee laxity. The SIR was negatively correlated with age. In younger patients (<30 years; n = 135), those with residual laxity had a significantly higher SIR than those without laxity; this relationship was not significant in older patients (≥30 years; n = 57). Based on receiver operating characteristic curves and logistic regression analysis, the cutoff values that were determined for the SIR were significantly associated with a higher odds ratio of residual laxity.

Conclusion:

Graft signal intensity decreased with patient age. Patients with higher graft signal intensity in the early postoperative phase after ACLR exhibited a higher prevalence of residual laxity, particularly in younger patients.

Tibial slope, remnant preservation, and graft size are the most important factors affecting graft healing after ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the anatomic, operative and biological factors that influenced graft healing after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

One hundred fourteen consecutive patients who underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring tendon autografts between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-four patients met the inclusion criteria with minimum follow-up of 12 months. Patients were evaluated with multiple clinical measurements, including International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF), Lyshom Scores, and Marx activity scale. To evaluate graft healing, the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) was measured at intra-articular graft and intra-tunnel integration were evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at one year after surgery. Potential factors affecting graft healing, including age, sex, body mass index, time from injury to surgery, posterior tibial slope, lateral femoral condyle ratio, notch width index, meniscal injury, remnant preservation, tunnel aperture locations, graft size, graft bending angle, graft/remaining notch volume ratio were evaluated for their association with graft SNQ value by stepwise regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were evaluated with mean follow-up 28.5 ± 9 months. Univariate regression analysis showed that posterior tibial slope, notch width index, remnant preserving procedure, high femoral tunnel, anterior tibial tunnel, graft bending angle, and graft/remaining notch volume ratio significantly associated with graft SNQ values. Multivariate regression analysis showed that lateral tibial slope, remnant preservation, and graft/remaining notch volume ratio were independent factors correlated with graft SNQ values. Also, the graft SNQ values was weakly correlated with femoral tunnel integration and Marx activity scale at one year. There was no correlation between graft SNQ values and IKDC-SKF and Lysholm scores. There was no correlation between graft SNQ values and International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibial slope, remnant preservation and graft/remaining notch volume ratio were significant independent associated factors of graft SNQ value at one year. The graft SNQ values were also weakly correlated with femoral tunnel integration and the Marx activity scale. These factors should be taken into account for ensuring the ideal graft healing and for the return to sport decision-making.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Laterally shifted tibial tunnel can be the risk of residual knee laxity for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

To elucidate the relationship between graft tunnel position and knee laxity in the cases of double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

METHODS

Total of 132 cases were included. Femoral and tibial tunnels were evaluated by quadrant method on 3D-CT. As additional reference of tibia, the distances from medial tibial spine to the tunnel center (D_MS) and from Parsons' knob to the tunnel center (D_PK) were evaluated; %D_MS/ML and %D_PK/AP were calculated (ML and AP: mediolateral and anteroposterior width of tibial plateau). Preoperative and postoperative (1 year from surgery) stabilities were evaluated by Lachman and pivot-shift procedures. If there was ≥ 2 mm side-to-side difference, the subject was defined as having anterior knee laxity (AKL); if the pivot-shift phenomenon was observed with IKDC grade ≥ 1, there was rotatory knee laxity (RKL). Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted with the prevalence of AKL or RKL as the dependent variable and with tunnel positions as the independent variables.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 subjects (15.9%) showed AKL, and 15 subjects (11.4%) showed RKL. Those with postoperative laxity showed higher %D_MS/ML and higher femoral position than those without laxity. Regarding posterolateral bundle, logistic regression model estimated that %D_MS/ML was associated with the prevalence of AKL (B = 0.608; p < 0.001) and RKL (B = 0.789; p < 0.001); %high-low femoral tunnel position (B =  - 0.127; p = 0.023) was associated with that of RKL.

CONCLUSION

There was the risk of residual knee laxity in ACL-reconstructed knee when tibial tunnel shifted more laterally or higher femoral tunnel was created with regard to posterolateral bundle.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Influence of selected plane on the evaluation of tibial tunnel locations using a three-dimensional bone model in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of a selected plane on the evaluation of tibial tunnel locations following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between two planes: the plane parallel to the tibial plateau (Plane A) and the plane perpendicular to the proximal tibial shaft axis (Plane B).

METHODS

Thirty-four patients who underwent double-bundle ACLR were included. Three-dimensional model of tibia was created using computed tomography images 2 weeks postoperatively, and tibial tunnels of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and posterolateral bundle (PLB) were extracted. To evaluate tibial tunnel locations, two planes (Planes A and B) were created. The locations of the tibial tunnel apertures of each bundle were evaluated using a grid method and compared between Planes A and B. The difference in coronal alignment between Planes A and B were also assessed.

RESULTS

The AMB and PLB tunnel apertures in Plane A were significantly more laterally located than in Plane B (mean difference; AMB, 1.5%; PLB, 1.7%, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in the anteroposterior direction between the planes. Coronal alignment difference between the planes was 16.8 ± 2.2°; Plane B was more valgus than Plane A.

CONCLUSION

Although tibial tunnel locations were not significantly influenced by the selected planes in the AP direction, subtle but statistically significant differences were found in the ML direction between the Planes A and B in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The findings suggest that both Planes A and B can be used in the assessment of tibial tunnel locations after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.