High survivorship rate and good clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up for lateral UKA: a systematic literature review

Severe Lateral Facet Patella Osteoarthritis Is Not Associated With Increased Failure at Mean 10 Years After Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine if severe lateral patella facet osteoarthritis was related to lower survivorship and poor patient-reported outcomes following fixed-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

There were 61 patients who underwent a fixed-bearing, nonrobotically assisted, lateral UKA between May 7, 2003 and December 18, 2019 and met the inclusion criteria. The patello-femoral joint was examined intraoperatively for chondral damage prior to UKA implantation. Severe lateral facet patella osteoarthritis (LFPOA) was defined as Outerbridge grades 3 or 4 changes on the lateral facet. All patients completed subjective functional outcomes questionnaires and a clinical examination at a minimum of 4 years following UKA.

RESULTS

Severe LFPOA was identified in 28 (46%) patients. At a mean follow-up of 10.9 years, there were no statistically significant differences in any Knee Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score (KOOS) subscale or Kujala scores between patients who had and did not have severe LFPOA. There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients who achieved Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the KOOS subscale scores between groups. Mean survival in patients who did not have severe LFPOA was 16.6 years (95% confidence interval, 15.4 to 17.7) compared to 18.9 years (95% confidence interval, 17.6 to 20.2) in patients who had severe LFPOA (P = 0.62).

CONCLUSIONS

Severe LFPOA did not result in lower survival or inferior functional outcomes compared to patients who did not have severe osteoarthritis at an average 10-year follow-up after fixed-bearing lateral UKA.

Fixed-Bearing Lateral Unicompartment Knee Arthroplasty in Degenerative ACL-Deficient and ACL-Intact Knees: A Matched Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees are no longer considered a contra-indication for unicompartment knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who had an ACL-deficient knee who underwent lateral UKA had similar mean 10-year outcomes compared to patients who had an ACL-intact knee and lateral UKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent a lateral UKA with ACL deficiency by a single surgeon between 2004 and 2016 were identified. Preoperative magnetic resonance images were utilized to identify a torn or absent ACL in all knees. The absence of an ACL was confirmed during arthroscopy prior to UKA. Patients were matched 1:2 based on age and sex with patients who underwent lateral UKA with an ACL intact knee. The primary patient-reported outcome variable was survival without conversion to total knee arthroplasty. Secondary outcomes included Veterans Rand-12, the Lysholm score, the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score activities of daily living subscale, and Sport subscale. A power analysis showed that 14 patients were needed to identify differences of 10 points on the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score with a power of 80% (P = .05).

RESULTS

The cohort of patients who had an ACL-deficient lateral UKA included 4 men and 12 women (43 to 82 years of age). The matched control group included 32 patients. The mean age of both groups was 67 years (range, 43 to 85). There were 2 patients in the ACL-deficient group who failed. At 10 years, survivorship in the ACL-deficient group was 85%, while survival in the ACL-intact group was 100% (P = .035). At an average follow-up of 11 years (range, 4 to 19.6), there was no difference in outcome scores between ACL-deficient and ACL-intact patients.

CONCLUSION

Fixed-bearing lateral UKA in the ACL-deficient knee resulted in lower survival than patients who had an intact ACL. Patient-reported outcomes were similar in both groups. The ACL-deficient patient who wishes to undergo lateral UKA should be counseled on the lower survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III. Retrospective cohort study.

The use of an imageless robotic system in revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

The application of robotics in revision arthroplasty particularly from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), is underexplored. The purpose of this study is to describe the surgical technique of an imageless robotic system used in the revision of UKA to TKA and to evaluate short- to mid-term outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective study includes 35 patients treated from May 2020 to July 2023. Demographic data of the patients were gathered and the reasons for needing revision surgery were assessed. All patients were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at the final follow-up of 31.3 ± 12.1 months, using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and range of motion (ROM). Additionally, a radiographic evaluation was performed, and implant survival was assessed by analyzing complications at final follow-up.

RESULTS

In 88.6% of the patients, a primary Posterior Stabilized (PS) or Constrained Posterior Stabilized prosthetic implant was used, with 11.4% of patients requiring a varus-valgus constraint implant. In 71.4% of the cases, a thinnest size liner of 10 mm was used. The use of the robotic system was never aborted for any reason. At final follow-up, the implant survival rate was 97.14%. Average OKS increased from 31.4 ± 9.4 to 41.5 ± 4.3, FJS-12 from 47.3 ± 19.3 to 80.7 ± 8.9; WOMAC at final follow-up was 17.8 ± 8.7, from 53.5 ± 21.3 preoperatively. Analyzing ROM, NRS and patient-reported outcome measures, there were significant differences in each parameter between prerevision surgery and final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights that in a cohort of patients undergoing robotic-assisted conversion from UKA to TKA, the use of an imageless procedure incorporating intraoperative bone morphing and alignment based on a functional philosophy has proven to be safe and has yielded excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort study.

Distinct knee phenotype variation: a comparative analysis of medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is relatively less common than medial UKA. There has been no comparative analysis of the constitutional phenotypes of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification of knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. Furthermore, the study analyzed whether CPAK phenotypes were maintained or altered after medial or lateral UKA.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent UKA. A radiological analysis was conducted using an EOS imaging system, and demographic data of patients undergoing UKA were collected. Performed measurements included the mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), lateral distal femur angle (LDFA), and medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA), which were analyzed both before and after UKA. The CPAK classification was used to classify knee alignment phenotypes.

RESULTS

A total of 310 knees of 244 patients were included in the study that underwent non-robotically assisted, fixed-bearing UKA (279 medial; 31 lateral). Preoperatively, the most common categories for knees were Type I (varus mechanical axis, 53.8%) in medial UKA and Type III (valgus alignment, 77.4%) in lateral UKA. Postoperatively, Type II (neutral mechanical axis) became the most common type for both groups, accounting for 34.1% in the medial UKA group and 25.8% in the lateral UKA group. Only 31.3% preserved their preoperative CPAK classification after the surgery (32.3% and 22.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The CPAK classification differs significantly between knees that underwent medial and lateral UKA. While 31.3% of knees maintained their native knee phenotype, there is a tendency towards a neutrally aligned classification after surgery for both medial and lateral UKA. The CPAK classification optimizes preoperative categorization and may assist surgeons in tailoring personalized therapies to improve clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Metal-backed versus all-poly tibia in the original cartier unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcomes and survivorship at long-term follow-up

PURPOSE

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable option for localized osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular osteonecrosis with several advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). UKA implants may feature a tibial component either all-polyethylene (AP) or metal-backed (MB). This study aims to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes and survivorship of 74 UKAs over 16 years, focusing on comparing the results and survivorship of MB versus AP tibial tray.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study assesses 74 patients who underwent medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using ACCURIS Uni Knee System (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) implants between January 2003 and December 2008. Patients were divided in two groups: all-polyethylene (AP) tibial implants and metal-backed (MB) tibial components. The two groups were compared at final follow-up regarding survivorship, revision rates and clinical outcomes using the WOMAC score, Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12).

RESULTS

Between January 2003 and December 2008, 74 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasties were implanted in 74 patients. Clinical outcomes were assessed with a mean follow-up of 214.4 months. The implant survivorship was 97.3% for the MB-UKAs and 94.6% for the AP-UKAs (p = 0.55). The average OKS in the MB-UKAs was 42, while in the AP-UKAs 41.6 (p = 0.53), with a total of 64.9% of patients exhibiting excellent outcomes (OKS > 41) and 35.1% showing good outcomes (OKS: 34-41). The average FJS-12 at final follow-up was 81.5 for the MB-UKAs and 82.3 for the AP-UKAs (p = 0.34). The average WOMAC score was 20. 9 for the MB-UKAs and 22.4 for the AP-UKAs (p = 0.55). No statistically significant differences were found between AP-UKAs and MB-UKAs in terms of patient demographics, surgical indications, or clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This research demonstrated outstanding implant durability and favorable outcomes during extended follow-up periods for both cohorts undergoing medial UKA utilizing the original fixed bearing Cartier design. The results regarding both survivorship and PROMs were equivalent the AP group and the MB group.

Perfect indications and how to avoid complications in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (LUKA) is a favorable alternative to distal femoral osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis; however, it only accounts for less than 1 ​% of the total number of knee replacements documented in national joint registries. The anatomy and biomechanics of the lateral knee compartment differ from the medial side, with a greater intrinsic laxity of the lateral collateral ligament complex compared with medial structures. Indications and surgical techniques must be tailored to each unicompartmental replacement to optimize outcomes and mitigate complications. This article will discuss the clinical indications, preoperative evaluation and workup, surgical technique, and outcomes for LUKA.

Long-term outcomes in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Survivorship of medial versus lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) currently represent an important portion of knee arthroplasty procedures and their usage is on an upward trend. Despite offering better functional outcomes and a quicker recovery compared with total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), UKAs are often scrutinized for their longevity. This article provides an in-depth examination of the technical nuances and survival rates of medial versus lateral UKAs, drawing on recent advances and findings in the field. This manuscript thoroughly evaluates the comparability of patient populations undergoing medial and lateral UKAs, considering their anatomical, biomechanical, and demographic differences. It delves into the specific technical challenges associated with each type and systematically assesses the factors that influence failure, including the intricacies of implant design and patient-specific variables. Despite relevant anatomical and biomechanical contrasts between medial and lateral UKAs, the recent literature points to comparable survival rates. The prevalence of early failures within the initial five years after operation underscores the criticality of precise patient selection and refined surgical techniques. The paper succinctly summarizes the pivotal literature and provides essential guidance for optimizing UKA survivorship. It underscores the importance of meticulous patient selection and precise surgical techniques, alongside the identification and mitigation of potential pitfalls that impact outcomes. Finally, robotic technology in UKA has considerably enhanced the precision and reproducibility, representing a viable solution to effectively meet and achieve the recommended technical objectives.

Arthroscopy Within Three Months Prior to Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With an Increased Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopy remains a commonly performed procedure in patients who have meniscal or other osteochondral pathology prior to ultimately being indicated for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study was to examine the timing of knee arthroscopy prior to UKA and its association with 2-year periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates and medical and surgical complications.

METHODS

Patients undergoing UKA who had history of ipsilateral arthroscopy within 2 years prior to the UKA were identified in a national insurance database. A control cohort of propensity matched patients who did not have a history of arthroscopy was identified. Study cohorts were established based on timing of the arthroscopic procedure: 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to12, and 12 to 24 months prior to UKA. Patients were included if they had 2-year postoperative follow-up after UKA. The 90-day rates of postoperative medical and 2-year surgical complications were recorded. Multivariate analysis was conducted to account for confounding variables and covariates.

RESULTS

A final cohort of 3,471 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients undergoing UKA within three months of the arthroscopic procedure demonstrated a higher incidence of PJI when compared to the control cohort (3.30 versus 1.12%, P = 0.012). In addition, there was an increased rate of periprosthetic fracture observed in those undergoing UKA within three months of arthroscopy when compared to the control (1.10 versus 0.20%, P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing ipsilateral arthroscopy within three months of a UKA demonstrated a nearly 3-fold increased incidence of PJI when compared to the control. There was no increased incidence of PJI when UKA was staged greater than three months after arthroscopy. These findings provide insight for preoperative considerations for arthroplasty surgeons in this patient population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Comparison of early curative effects of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with total knee arthroplasty and the legacy constrained condylar knee arthroplasty in the treatment of isolated lateral osteoarthritis: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Aims of this study were to compare the functional and radiographic results, perioperative complication after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (LUKA) with total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and the legacy constrained condylar knee (LCCK) arthroplasty for the treatment of lateral compartmental knee osteoarthritis (LCKOA), and to provide a basis for the treatment of LCKOA.

METHODS

From January 2021 to January 2024, analyzed retrospectively clinical data of 74 patients with LCKOA treated with LUKA, TKA and LCCK arthroplasty. According to the operation plan, the patients were divided into three groups: LUKA group (23 cases), TKA group (23 cases) and LCCK group (28 cases). The changes of hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle of the affected knee before and after operation were measured. All patients were assessed using the operation time, blood loss during operation, incision length, visual analogue scale (VAS) score before operation and after operation, Hospital for Special Surgery score (HSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion (ROM).

RESULTS

All 74 patients were followed up for (2.38 ± 0.33) years. The operation time, blood loss during operation, incision length and VAS score after operation in the LUKA group were significantly less than those in the TKA group and LCCK group (P < 0.05); HKA valgus angle, ROM, HSS score and OKS score of the three groups after operation were significantly better than those before operation (P < 0.05); There was no significant difference among the three groups in HSS score and OKS score (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LUKA, TKA and LCCK arthroplasty have good clinical effect in the treatment of LCKOA; Compared with TKA and LCCK arthroplasty, LUKA has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, less pain and quick recovery. The short-term effect is satisfactory, and the long-term effect remains to be observed.

Lateral UKA can be a safe solution in a young patients' population: a 10-year follow-up report

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the long-term survivorship and functional outcomes of fixed-bearing lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in a young patients' population with osteoarthritis limited to the lateral compartment.

METHODS

The study included a cohort of consecutive patients who underwent lateral UKA between January 2008 and December 2014 at a single high-volume surgical center. The surgical procedures were performed by experienced surgeons using a lateral parapatellar approach and fixed-bearing implants. Patient follow-up included a retrospective re-evaluation, clinical assessments, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and X-ray analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 40 lateral UKAs were analyzed, with 19 performed on the left and 21 on the right knee. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 57.6 years, and the mean BMI was 24.8. At the final follow-up, 80% of patients achieved excellent outcomes (OKS > 41), and 20% had good outcomes (OKS: 34-41). No patients exhibited fair or poor outcomes. The mean FJS at the final follow-up was 82.8. The mean WOMAC was 10.5. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a survivorship rate of 93.1% at 10 years, considering revision for any reason as endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral UKA proved to be an effective treatment option for osteoarthritis affecting the lateral compartment of the knee. The study demonstrated a high survivorship rate and favorable functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 132.7 months. These findings highlight the potential benefits of fixed-bearing lateral UKA in selected patients with lateral compartment knee pathology.

Long-term functional success and robust implant survival in lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A case series with a mean follow-up of twenty two and a half years

PURPOSE

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an accepted treatment option in cases of end-stage lateral osteoarthritis. While lateral UKA has many proposed advantages compared to total knee arthroplasty, its technical challenges and relatively small number of cases make this an uncommon procedure. The aim of this study was to report the survivorship and functional outcomes beyond 20 years of follow-up of isolated UKA.

METHODS

Between January 1988 and October 2003, 54 lateral UKAs were performed in a single center. The fitted prosthesis was a fixed plate and cemented polyethylene (PE). All patients had isolated lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, including five open meniscectomies, three arthroscopies, and three open reductions of lateral tibial plateau fractures. Patients with a minimum of 20 years of follow-up were included in the final analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 54 UKA, 22 died before reaching the minimum follow-up period and four were lost to follow-up. Twenty-eight were included in the final analysis. Among them, 21 patients remained alive and an additional seven were deceased after 20 years. The mean age at the last follow-up was 84.8 ± 11.9 years with a mean follow-up duration of 22.5 ± 2.1 years. Of the 28 knees, eight underwent revision surgery (5 for the progression of osteoarthritis; 2 for aseptic loosening; 1 for PE wear). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed a survival rate at 20 and 25 years of 72.3% (CI 59.1; 88.6). The average time to revision was 14.9 ± 4.9 years. At the last follow-up, the mean function Knee Society Score (KSS) was 41.5 ± 32.9 and the mean objective KSS score was 79.4 ± 9.7. In the unrevised population, 94.7% of patients (n = 18) reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Lateral UKA remains a viable treatment option for patients with isolated lateral tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, providing satisfactory 20-year implant survivorship and high patient satisfaction.

Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis Secondary to Lateral Meniscectomy: High Functional Results and Survivorship and Low Osteoarthritis Progression at a Mean 10 Years of Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Meniscectomy, whether partial or total, is a common knee surgery, but it considerably increases the risk of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Lateral meniscectomy has more severe consequences than medial meniscectomy, leading to faster OA progression and worse clinical outcomes. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a suitable treatment option for lateral OA and has demonstrated better outcomes than total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical and functional results, OA progression in the medial compartment, and implant survivorship following lateral UKA in patients with OA secondary to lateral meniscectomy and to compare these outcomes with those of patients who underwent lateral UKA for primary lateral OA.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2017, 214 lateral UKAs were performed. Of these, 42 were performed for OA secondary to lateral meniscectomy. The control group was composed of patients who underwent lateral UKA for primary lateral OA and was formed through a 1:1 case-control matching process based on sex, age, body mass index, and operation date. The outcomes that were studied included range of motion, Knee Society Score, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, Tegner Activity Scale, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analog scale for pain, OA progression in the medial compartment, and implant survivorship.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 10.2 years, both groups demonstrated significant improvements (p < 0.01) after lateral UKA in all clinical and functional scores except the UCLA Activity Score and Tegner Activity Scale. No significant differences in clinical and functional scores were found between the groups. However, patients with OA secondary to meniscectomy exhibited significantly less OA progression in the medial compartment (p = 0.035) and higher 10-year implant survival (97.6% versus 83.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral UKA is an effective treatment option for OA secondary to lateral meniscectomy, providing excellent functional outcomes and survivorship. Patients with post-meniscectomy OA exhibited less OA progression in the medial compartment than patients with primary OA and, consequently, had better 10-year implant survivorship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Biomechanical effects of femoral prosthesis misalignment on the structure of the lateral compartment during medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in osteoporotic patients

BACKGROUND

This study aims to investigate the impact of varying coronal alignments of femoral prostheses on stress and strain distributions within the lateral compartment following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in patients with normal bone density and osteoporosis using finite element analysis. Additionally, it examines the relationship between osteoporosis and the progression of osteoarthritis in the lateral compartment postoperatively.

METHODS

UKA models were developed for both normal bone and osteoporotic conditions using a validated finite element model of the knee. Seven alignment conditions for the femoral prosthesis were simulated: 0° (neutral alignment), varus angles of 3°, 6°, and 9°, and valgus angles of 3°, 6°, and 9°, resulting in a total of 14 scenarios. Stress and strain distributions in the meniscus, tibial cartilage, and femoral cartilage of the lateral compartment were evaluated.

RESULTS

The results indicated that stress and strain in the meniscus, tibial cartilage, and femoral cartilage of the lateral compartment increased with greater varus alignment and decreased with greater valgus alignment in both normal and osteoporotic models. At equivalent alignment angles, stress and strain were consistently higher in the osteoporotic model (M2) compared to the normal bone model (M1), although the peak equivalent stress in the tibial cartilage was lower in the M2 model than in the M1 model.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with osteoporosis undergoing fixed-bearing medial UKA, varus malalignment of the femoral prosthesis can lead to increased stress and strain in the lateral compartment's meniscus, tibial cartilage, and femoral cartilage. These findings suggest that osteoporosis may contribute to abnormal stress and strain distributions in the lateral compartment following UKA, potentially accelerating the progression of osteoarthritis in this region postoperatively.

No difference in Oxford Knee Score between medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty after two years of follow-up: a clinical trial

PURPOSE

In patients with monocompartmental knee osteoarthritis, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can be performed. This study compared the medial versus lateral UKA in patients with monocompartimental knee arthroplasty. It was hypothesised that both implants achieve a similar outcome in OKS.

METHODS

The UKAs were fixed-bearing medial PPK (Zimmer-Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, USA) and fixed-bearing lateral Zuk (Lima Corporate, Udine, Italy). An intraarticular drain was placed and removed on the first postoperative day. Enoxaparin sodium 4000 units subcutaneously daily for 45 days was used as thromboembolic prophylaxis. The Italian version of the OKS was used for the clinical assessment. The following complications were also recorded: anterior knee pain, infection and revision surgeries.

RESULTS

Data from 203 patients were collected. The mean age of the patients was 68.9 ± 6.7 years and the mean BMI was 28.1 ± 4.1 kg/m2. The mean OKS on admission was 22.1 ± 4.5 points. On admission, women, patients older than 70 years, and those with a BMI lower than 28 kg/m2 who underwent lateral UKA evidenced lower OKS. At the last follow-up, 26.7 and 26.9 months for the lateral and medial UKA, respectively, no between groups difference in OKS was evidenced. No patients experienced complications.

CONCLUSION

Medial and lateral UKA achieve similar outcomes in OKS at a minimum of two years of follow-up.

The Role of Severe Lateral Facet Patellar Osteoarthritis in Patient Selection for Success of a Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Mean Follow-Up of 10 Years

BACKGROUND

Lateral facet patellar osteoarthritis (LFPOA) has been reported as a contraindication for medial unicompartmental (UKA). The purpose of this paper was to determine if severe LFPOA was related to lower survivorship and patient-reported outcomes following medial UKA.

METHODS

A total of 170 medial UKAs were performed. Severe LFPOA was defined as Outerbridge grade 3 to 4 damage on the lateral facet cartilage surfaces of the patella as noted intraoperatively. There were 122 of 170 patients (72%) who had noLFPOA and 48 of 170 patients (28%) who had had severe LFPOA. A routine patelloplasty was performed in all patients. Patients completed the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) Mental Component Score (MCS) and Physical Component Score (PCS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Knee Society Score.

RESULTS

There were 4 patients in the noLFPOA group who required total knee arthroplasty and 2 in the LFPOA group. There was no significant difference in mean survival time: noLFPOA = 17.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI): 17 to 18] and LFPOA = 18.0 years [95% CI: 17 to 19] (P = .94). At mean follow-up of 10 years, there were no significant differences in knee flexion or extension. Patello-femoral crepitus without pain was noted in 7 patients who had LFPOA and 21 patients who had noLFPOA. There were no significant differences in VR-12 MCS, PCS, KOOS subscales, or Knee Society Score between groups. Patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) was achieved in 80% (90 of 112) for KOOS ADL in the noLFPOA group and 82% (36 of 44) in the LFPOA group (P = .68). PASS was achieved in 82% (92 of 112) for KOOS Sport in the noLFPOA group and 82% (36/44) in the LFPOA group (P = .87).

CONCLUSION

At a mean of 10 years, patients who had LFPOA had equivalent survivorship and functional outcomes to patients who did not have LFPOA. These long-term results suggest that asymptomatic grade 3 or 4 LFPOA is not a contraindication to medial UKA.

Survival of Patient-Specific Unicondylar Knee Replacement

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in isolated medial or lateral osteoarthritis leads to good clinical results. However, revision rates are higher in comparison to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). One reason is suboptimal fitting of conventional off-the-shelf prostheses, and major overhang of the tibial component over the bone has been reported in up to 20% of cases. In this retrospective study, a total of 537 patient-specific UKAs (507 medial prostheses and 30 lateral prostheses) that had been implanted in 3 centers over a period of 10 years were analyzed for survival, with a minimal follow-up of 1 year (range 12 to 129 months). Furthermore, fitting of the UKAs was analyzed on postoperative X-rays, and tibial overhang was quantified. A total of 512 prostheses were available for follow-up (95.3%). Overall survival rate (medial and lateral) of the prostheses after 5 years was 96%. The 30 lateral UKAs showed a survival rate of 100% at 5 years. The tibial overhang of the prosthesis was smaller than 1 mm in 99% of cases. In comparison to the reported results in the literature, our data suggest that the patient-specific implant design used in this study is associated with an excellent midterm survival rate, particularly in the lateral knee compartment, and confirms excellent fitting.

Survival of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at short-, mid-, and long-term follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The infrequency of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has led to a lack of understanding of its survival. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the survivorship results of lateral UKA at different follow-ups based on available literature.

METHODS

Five databases were searched for eligible studies. Pooled survivorships with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) at 3, 5, 10, 15, and 20 years after lateral UKA were estimated using a random-effect model. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 26 studies involving 5470 lateral UKAs were included. Survivorships of lateral UKA at 3-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year follow-ups were 96% (95% CI: 95-98%, I2 : 77.5%), 94% (95% CI: 93-96%, I2 : 70.8%), 88% (95% CI: 84-91%, I2 : 70.8%), 85% (95% CI: 79-91%, I2 : 70.8%), and 78% (95% CI: 71-85%, I2 : 54.2%), respectively. Subgroup analyses found that bearing type, the number of surgeons, and year of publication might be associated with implant survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Lateral UKA is an effective procedure with excellent survivorships at short-, mid-, and long-term follow-ups. Results suggest a single-surgeon lateral UKA using fixed-bearing. Additional well-designed studies are needed to elucidate the current findings.

Robotic-arm assisted lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 5-Year outcomes & survivorship

INTRODUCTION

Robotic-arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) has demonstrated accurate component positioning and excellent outcomes for medial components. However, there is a paucity of literature on lateral compartment RA-UKA. The purpose of our study was to assess the midterm clinical outcomes and survivorship of lateral RA-UKA.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of a single-center prospectively maintained cohort of 33 patients (36 knees) indicated for lateral UKA. Perioperative, and postoperative two- and five-year Knee injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Score (WOMAC), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) patient reported outcome measures were collected. Five-year follow-up was recorded in 29 patients (32 knees).

RESULTS

Mean follow up was 5.1 ± 0.1 years. Mean age and BMI was 70.9 ± 7.2 years and 29.0 ± 4.2 kg/m2, respectively. At discharge, mean distance walked was 273.4 ± 70.4 feet, and mean pain score was 2.0 ± 2.5. At 2-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.1 ± 13.5, 15.0 ± 7.2, and 81.0 ± 23.3, respectively. At 5-year follow up, mean KOOS, WOMAC, and FJS were 75.3 ± 14.6, 14.9 ± 5.0, and 75.8 ± 27.4, respectively. Mean change in KOOS and WOMAC were 35.6 ± 27.1 and 11.7 ± 13.4 (p< .001 and p< .001). 94% of patients were very satisfied/satisfied, 3% neutral, and 3% dissatisfied. 91% met activity expectations, and 59% were more active than before. Survivorship was 100% at 5 years.

DISCUSSION

In this study, lateral RA-UKA demonstrated significantly improved clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, met expectations, and excellent functional recovery at midterm follow up. Comparative studies are needed to determine differences between robotic-assisted and conventional lateral UKA, as well as TKA.

Mild Valgus Alignment After Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Led to Lower Functional Results and Survivorship at Mean 8-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

In medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), the best results and the highest survivorship are found by mild undercorrection of varus deformities. In lateral UKA, the desirable amount of valgus undercorrection has not yet been determined. The purposes of this study were to present the results of a consecutive series of lateral UKAs and to investigate the effect of postoperative limb alignment on them.

METHODS

A total of 161 lateral UKA were reviewed. Outcomes studied included range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), University of California Los Angeles Activity Score, Tegner Activity Scale, Forgotten Joint Score, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and survivorship. Patients were divided into two groups according to postoperative alignment: group A (hip-knee-ankle ≥184°, 79 UKA) and group B (hip-knee-ankle <184°, 82 UKA).

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 8 years (range, 2-18), ROM (P < .01); KSS-C (P < .01); KSS-F (P < .01); VAS (P < .01) improved from baseline. No differences were noted in postoperative ROM, VAS, University of California Los Angeles, Tegner Activity Scale, and Forgotten Joint Score between groups. Group A showed higher postoperative clinical and functional KSS (P < .01) and higher survivorship (96.2 versus 91.5%, P = .01) than group B.

CONCLUSION

Mild valgus alignment (3° or less) after lateral UKA is linked to lower clinical and functional scores and lower survivorship compared to moderate valgus (over 4°) at mean 8-year follow-up. More undercorrection of the coronal deformity in lateral UKA compared to medial UKA is desirable to get the best results.

Disease progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocations are the main revision indications after lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a surgical option for patients with isolated lateral osteoarthritis however, the procedure has higher revision rates than medial UKA. The reason for this remains unclear; therefore, a better understanding of the indications for lateral UKA revision is needed.

AIM

The primary aim of this systematic review was to identify revision indications for lateral UKA. Secondary aims were to further investigate if revision indications were influenced by implant design and time from surgery.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Search was performed in January 2022 in MedLine, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library using the keywords "knee arthroplasty", "unicompartmental", "reoperation", synonyms and abbreviations. Articles published in 2000-2021 that were at least level III retrospective cohort studies with at least 10 lateral UKAs and reported all failure modes were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. Revision indications, patient characteristics, study design, implant types and time to failure were extracted from the selected studies. Collated data were tabulated and differences were tested using Chi-square or Fisher's exact test.

FINDINGS

A total of 29 cohort and 4 registry studies that included 7,668 UKAs met the inclusion criteria. Studies were judged as having moderate or severe risk of bias; this was associated with the retrospective nature of studies required to investigate long-term outcomes of knee arthroplasty. The main indications for lateral UKA revision were OA progression (35%), aseptic loosening (17%) and bearing dislocation (14%). The incidence of revision was similar for mobile-bearing implants (7.6%) and fixed-bearing (6.4%). For mobile-bearing implants, there was introduction of bearing dislocations as an additional mode of failure (24% cf. 0%, p < 0.001). For fixed-bearing implants, the incidence of revision was higher for all-poly-ethylene (13.9%) than metal-backed (1.8%) tibial components. Early lateral UKA failures were associated with bearing dislocations (sequential decrease from 69% under 6 months to 0% 10+ years, p < 0.001), whereas late failures were associated with OA progression (sequential increase from 0% under 6 months to 100% > 10+ years, p < 0.01). Compared with medial UKA, OA progression (41% cf. 30%, p = 0.004), malalignment (2.7% cf. 0.8%, p = 0.02), instability (4% cf. 1%, p = 0.02) and bearing dislocations (20% cf. 10%, p < 0.001) were more common for lateral UKA.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

OA progression, aseptic loosening and bearing dislocation were the three main revision indications for lateral UKA. Compared to medial UKA, OA progression, malalignment, instability and bearing dislocations were more common revision indications for lateral UKA. Higher survivorship of metal-backed fixed-bearing implants was found. The findings suggest that the outcomes of lateral UKA may be improved with more optimal alignment, gap balancing and patient selection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III systematic review.

Isolated Lateral Tibiofemoral Compartment Osteoarthritis: Survivorship and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Lateral Fixed-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty at Mean 10-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an excellent option to alleviate disability and restore function in patients with lateral compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of the present study was to determine the survivorship and long-term outcomes in both younger/middle-aged and older patients with lateral compartment OA following non-robotically-assisted, fixed-bearing lateral UKA and to determine if an acceptable symptom state can be achieved.

METHODS

All patients were managed with fixed-bearing lateral UKA by a single surgeon utilizing a lateral parapatellar approach without robotic assistance. The primary outcome variables were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Sport subscale scores. In addition, the other KOOS subscores, the Lysholm score, the achievement of the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and the Veterans RAND (VR-12) Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and Mental Component Summary score (MCS) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: younger/middle-aged patients (<60 years of age) and older patients (≥60 years of age).

RESULTS

A cohort of 256 patients underwent medial (n = 193) or lateral (n = 63) UKA. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. At mean of 10 years (range, 4 to 17 years) of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of any patient-reported outcome measures (p > 0.05). The percentage of patients in whom PASS was achieved on the KOOS ADL and Sport subscores was 82% and 88%, respectively, in the younger cohort and 80% and 80%, respectively, in the older cohort. The mean survival estimate of the prothesis was 15.3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5 to 16.2 years) for the entire cohort. The estimated rate of implant survival in the younger cohort was 100% at 5 and 10 years, and the estimated rate of implant survival in the older cohort was 98% at 5 years and 96% at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral fixed-bearing, non-robotic UKA for the treatment of isolated lateral compartment OA resulted in >80% of patients reaching an acceptable symptom state in terms of both activities of daily living and sporting activities. UKA provides an excellent option that provides longevity with high PASS rates and return to activities with a low risk of complications and failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

The Lawrence D. Dorr Surgical Techniques & Technologies Award: Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) in Medial and Lateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Does the Status of the ACL Impact Outcomes?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine if there is a difference in the percentage of patients who reach Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) when comparing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient and ACL-intact knees following fixed-bearing medial and lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

A consecutive series of 215 knees that underwent UKA (medial = 158, lateral = 57) were included in the study. The Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score functional score [KOOS activities of daily living (ADL)] and KOOS Sport were used as the primary outcome variables. A KOOS ADL PASS of 87.5 and KOOS Sport PASS of 43.8 were previously described for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Failure was defined as conversion to TKA.

RESULTS

There were 157 in the ACL-intact group and 58 in the ACL-deficient group. Conversion to TKA was 3.7%. The failure rate in the ACL-deficient group was 5% (3/58) and 3% (5/157) in the ACL-intact group (P = .447). The mean survival for the entire group was 18.1 years (95% confidence interval 17.6-18.6). At 10 years, the survival was 94.3% (standard error = 0.028) in the ACL-deficient group and 97.6% (standard error = 0.014) in the ACL-intact group. At a mean 10 ± 3.5 years, with 93% follow-up, 83% in the ACL-deficient group and 80% in the ACL-intact group reached PASS for KOOS ADL (P = .218). For KOOS Sport, 85% of the ACL-deficient group compared to 81% in the ACL-intact group (P = .374) reached PASS.

CONCLUSION

The ACL-deficient cohort results were not significantly different compared to ACL-intact knees in both medial and lateral compartment UKA. Fixed-bearing medial and lateral UKA resulted in low failure rate and excellent long-term outcomes.

Robot-assisted knee arthroplasty improves component positioning and alignment, but results are inconclusive on whether it improves clinical scores or reduces complications and revisions: a systematic overview of meta-analyses

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic overview was to identify, synthesise and critically appraise findings of meta-analyses on robot-assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The hypothesis was that robotic assistance would reduce complications and revision rates, yield better clinical scores, and improve component positioning and alignment.

METHODS

Two researchers independently conducted a literature search using Embase^®, MEDLINE^®, Web of Science, Allied and Complementary Medicine™ and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 2 November 2020 for meta-analyses (Level I-IV) on robotic assistance in UKA and/or TKA. Outcomes were tabulated and reported as weighted mean difference (WMD), risk ratio (RR) or weighted odds ratio (WOR), and were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of ten meta-analyses were identified; four on robot-assisted UKA (n, 1880 robot-assisted vs. 2352 conventional UKA; follow-up, 0 to 60 months), seven on robot-assisted TKA (n, 4567 robot-assisted vs. 5966 conventional TKA; follow-up, 0 to 132 months). Of the meta-analyses on UKA, one found that robotic assistance reduced complication rates (relative risk (RR), 0.62), one found that it improved clinical scores (weighted mean difference (WMD), 19.67), three found that it extended operation times (WMD, 15.7 to 17.1 min), and three found that it improved component positioning and alignment (WMD, - 1.30 to - 3.02 degrees). Of the meta-analyses on TKA, two found that robotic assistance improved clinical scores (WMD, 1.62-1.71), two found that that it extended surgery times (WMD, 21.5-24.26 min), and five found that it improved component positioning and alignment (WMD, - 0.50 to - 10.07 degrees). None of the meta-analyses reported differences in survivorship between robot-assisted versus conventional knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted knee arthroplasty enabled more accurate component positioning and placement within target zones, but extended operation time considerably. Although robotic assistance improved component positioning, its benefits regarding clinical scores, patient satisfaction and implant survivorship remains to be confirmed. Finally, this overview revealed that six of the ten meta-analyses were of 'critically low quality', calling for caution when interpreting results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Facile Synthesis of Hollow MnO2 Nanoparticles for Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging in Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative joint disease whose molecular mechanism has not been revealed clearly, and there is still no effective approach to cure OA completely. Recently, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are exposed as an important mediator of OA's inflammatory response, and it has been regarded as a therapeutic target for OA treatment. MnO₂ nanoparticles possess good biocompatibility and can act as an artificial nanoenzyme to scavenge ROS in various diseases effectively. In this study, the modified Stöber method was applied to synthesize hollow MnO₂ (H-MnO₂) and H-MnO₂ was modified with NH₂-PEG-NH₂, which possesses excellent biological stability and biocompatibility. It induced a change in the articular cartilage structure changes in vivo, with the knee tissue staining and micro-CT scanning of the whole knee suggesting that H-MnO₂ nanoparticles could effectively remove ROS and significantly relieve the inflammatory response of OA without obvious side effects. This study reveals the therapeutic effects of MnO₂-based nanomedicine toward OA, which provides potential alternative therapeutic options for patients with inflammation tissue.