Comparable clinical and radiological outcomes between anatomical and high femoral tunnels in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The Effect of Aging on Outcomes after Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Older (≥ 50 Years) Versus Younger (< 50 Years) Patients

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in ≥ 50-year-old patients.

Methods

This retrospective case-control study reviewed 28 patients (age, ≥ 50 years) who underwent PCL reconstruction from 2004 to 2018. These patients were 1 : 1 matched to < 50-year-old patients by sex. Clinical, radiological, and survivorship outcomes of the patients were assessed at the final follow-up. Failure of PCL reconstruction was defined as the requirement for additional surgery (revision PCL reconstruction, high tibial osteotomy, or arthroplasty) due to unrelieved symptoms or grade III instability on stress radiographs.

Results

The mean follow-up periods (± standard deviation) in < 50- and ≥ 50-year-old patients were 3.9 ± 1.0 years and 3.6 ± 1.9 years, respectively (p = 0.583). In < 50- and ≥ 50-year-old patients, the mean International Knee Documentation Committee scores were 64.1 ± 10.3 and 53.5 ± 17.3; mean Lysholm scores were 81.4 ± 13.0 and 66.3 ± 21.5; and mean Tegner activity scores were 6.1 ± 1.4 and 4.8 ± 1.7, respectively (p = 0.032, p = 0.018, and p = 0.016, respectively). Side-to-side differences in posterior translation on Telos stress radiographs at the final follow-up were 4.4 ± 1.4 mm and 6.9 ± 3.0 mm in < 50- and ≥ 50-year-old patients, respectively (p < 0.001). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the failure-free survival rates of both groups were significantly different in the follow-up period (p = 0.014). The failure-free survival rates for < 50- and ≥ 50-year-old patients were 100% and 78.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Clinical, radiological, and survivorship outcomes were inferior among ≥ 50-year-old patients after PCL reconstruction. Thus, surgeons should be careful when deciding and performing PCL reconstruction in patients 50 years old or over.

Safe femoral tunnel drilling angles avoid injury to the medial and posteromedial femoral anatomic structures during single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the inside-out technique

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between the medial and posteromedial femoral anatomic structures and the femoral tunnel exit produced by different tunnel orientations when creating the femoral tunnel for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (PCLR) using the inside-out (IO) technique and to estimate safe tunnel orientations to minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury to these structures.

METHODS

Eleven cadaveric knees were used. The medial and posteromedial aspects of each knee joint were dissected to reveal the "safe zone," which is a bony area that avoids the distribution or attachment of at-risk structures (MCL, PMC structures, and articular cartilage), while remaining 10 mm away from the articular cartilage. The hypothesis of this study was that by creating the femoral tunnel at specific angles using the IO technique, the tunnel outlet would be as close to the safe zone as possible, protecting the at-risk structures from damage. Femoral tunnels were drilled at 20 different angle combinations on each specimen: 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° relative to a line parallel to the transepicondylar axis in the axial plane, as well as 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60° relative to a line parallel to the femoral axis in the coronal plane. The positional relationship between each tunnel exit and the safe zone was recorded, and the shortest distance between the exit center and the safe zone boundary was measured.

RESULTS

The risk of iatrogenic injury differed depending on the drilling orientation (χ² = 168.880, P < 0.001). Femoral drilling angle combinations of 45/45°, 45/60°, 60/30°, 60/45°, and 60/60° (axial/coronal) were considered relatively safer than other orientations (P < 0.05). The shortest distance between the tunnel exit and the safe zone boundary was negatively correlated with the angle in the axial plane (P < 0.001, r = - 0.810).

CONCLUSIONS

When creating the IO femoral tunnel for single-bundle PCL reconstruction, angle combinations of 45/45°, 45/60°, 60/30°, 60/45°, and 60/60° (axial/oblique coronal) could be utilized to prevent at-risk structures from being damaged. The drilling angles and the safe zone can be employed to optimize the femoral tunnel in PCLR.

Effect of Posterior Tibial Slopes on Graft Survival Rates at 10 Years After Primary Single-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Recent biomechanical studies have reported that stress on the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) graft increases as the posterior tibial slope (PTS) decreases (flattened) in knees with single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle PCL reconstruction. Clinical studies of SB PCL reconstruction have shown that a flattened PTS is associated with a lesser reduction in posterior tibial translation. There is no long-term study on the clinical outcomes and graft survival rates of SB PCL reconstruction based on the medial and lateral PTSs measured on magnetic resonance imaging.

HYPOTHESIS

Flattened medial and lateral PTSs are associated with poor clinical outcomes and graft survival rates at a minimum 10-year follow-up after SB PCL reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

In this cohort study, we retrospectively reviewed 46 patients (mean age, 28.8 ± 9.9 years) who underwent primary SB PCL reconstruction between 2000 and 2009. They were followed up for a minimum of 10 years. The medial and lateral PTSs were measured on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. As a previous study reported that a steeper medial or lateral PTS showed a higher risk of anterior tibial translation at thresholds of 5.6° and 3.8°, respectively, the patients were divided into 2 groups based on the cutoff values of both the medial (≤5.6° vs >5.6°) and lateral (≤3.8° vs >3.8°) PTSs. Clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity score), radiological outcomes (side-to-side difference [SSD] on stress radiography and osteoarthritis progression), and graft survival rates were compared between the groups at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

All clinical scores and the progression of osteoarthritis demonstrated no significant difference between the 2 subgroups of both the medial and lateral PTS groups. The mean SSD on stress radiography after SB PCL reconstruction was significantly greater in patients with a medial PTS ≤5.6° than in patients with a medial PTS >5.6° (8.4 ± 3.9 vs 5.1 ± 2.9 mm, respectively; P = .030), while the lateral PTS subgroups after SB PCL reconstruction demonstrated no significant difference. The minimum 10-year graft survival rate was significantly lower in patients with a medial PTS ≤5.6° (68.4% vs 92.6%, respectively; P = .029) and a lateral PTS ≤3.8° (50.0% vs 91.7%, respectively; P = .001).

CONCLUSION

A flattened medial PTS (≤5.6°) was associated with an increased SSD on stress radiography, and both flattened medial (≤5.6°) and lateral (≤3.8°) PTSs resulted in lower graft survival rates at a minimum 10-year follow-up after primary SB PCL reconstruction.

Good clinical and radiological results following remnant-preserving posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

The objective of this systematic literature review was to report the results and complications of recent remnant preservation techniques in posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched the PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases using the terms "posterior cruciate ligament" or "PCL" and "remnant preserving." The outcome measures extracted from the studies were the Lysholm score, the International Knee Documentation Committee's (IKDC) subjective and objective scores, Tegner scores, Orthopädische Arbeitsgruppe Knie (OAK) rate of return to sports, and rate of complications. Data were also extracted from studies that used stress radiographs to perform a quantitative assessment of the preoperative and postoperative anteroposterior stability.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 13 studies. The patient cohort of consisted of 643 participants (544 [84.6%] men and 99 [15.4%] women) with a mean age of 32.9 ± 4.0 years. The mean postoperative follow-up was 34.5 ± 10.9 months (range: 24-96 months), while the mean time from injury to surgery was 14.4 ± 9.9 months (range: 0-240 months). All studies reported clinically significant improvement at final follow-up, as evident from the measured subjective and objective IKDC scores, Lysholm score, Tegner score, and OAK rate. Only three studies reported return to sports activity, with a mean percentage of 90.8% (99/109). All studies showed a significant improvement in posterior translation, from 11.5 ± 1.2 mm to 3.3 ± 1.1 mm, using radiography (side-to-side difference). This systematic review revealed 13 (2.0%) failures and 33 (5.1%) minor complications: 10 (1.6%) cases of stiffness, 21 (4.9%) screws removal, 1 (0.2%) injury of the peroneal nerve, and 1 (0.2%) fibular fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

With the currently available data, all studies included in the review on posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation demonstrated satisfactory outcomes at mid-term follow-up (> 24 months), despite varying surgical techniques and graft types, and intervals from injury to surgery. For clinical relevance, standard PCL reconstruction is a highly effective operation in terms of improvement in functional status, knee stability, quality of life, and cost effectiveness. The remnant preservation technique requires more comprehensive diagnostic assessments of the PCL remnant patterns and more complicated surgical procedures. Given the absence so far of high quality studies with long-term follow-up, the remnant-preserving techniques should be recommended only by experienced knee arthroscopic surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

STUDY REGISTRATION

reviewregistry1376- www.researchregistry.com .