Utilizing a contralateral hamstring autograft facilitates earlier isokinetic and isometric strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial

Strength and Functional Outcomes Following Achilles Tendon Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft Augmentation

BACKGROUND

The proposed advantages of hamstring autograft reconstruction when compared to alternative procedures, such as flexor hallucis longus (FHL) transfer, V-Y lengthening, and allograft reconstruction, are improved healing and reproduction of normal tendon biomechanics and reduced morbidity within the foot and ankle. In this study, we examined the effect of Achilles tendon reconstruction using hamstring autografts on strength and functional outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent Achilles repair with a hamstring autograft for insertional or midsubstance tendinopathy, delayed diagnosis of rupture, or infection after primary repair were evaluated for inclusion. Forty-six patients were identified; 12 further augmented with an FHL transfer are included in the analysis. Isokinetic testing was completed with a Biodex dynamometer under supervision of a physical therapist masked to surgical side. Pre- and postoperative Foot and Ankle Outcome Scores (FAOS, before March 2016) or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS, after March 2016) surveys were collected.

RESULTS

For knee flexion, peak torque was not significantly different when comparing operative and nonoperative sides at 180 degrees/second (45.38 Nm vs 45.96 Nm; P = .69) nor at 300 degrees/second (44.2 Nm vs 47.02 Nm; P = .069). Knee extension absolute peak torque was only found to be significantly weaker on the operative side at the faster testing (75.5 Nm vs 79.56 Nm; P < .05). Peak ankle plantarflexion torque was significantly weaker on the operative side at both the slower speed (60 degrees/second: 39.9 Nm vs 48.76 Nm; P < .005) and the faster speed (120 degrees/second: 31.3 Nm vs 40.7 Nm; P < .001). Average power for ankle plantarflexion did not differ significantly from the operative side to the nonoperative side in the slower test (26.46 W vs 27.48 W; P = .60) but did significantly differ on the faster test (32.13 W vs 37.63 W; P = .041). At an average of 19.9 months postoperation, all physical function and pain-related patient-reported outcome scores showed clinically and statistically significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

Achilles reconstruction with a hamstring autograft ± FHL transfer allowed patients with severe Achilles pathology to return to good subjective function, with modest deficits in calf strength compared with the uninjured side. Overall knee flexion strength did not appear impaired. These results suggest that hamstring autograft reconstruction is a viable method to treat these complex cases involving a lack of healthy tissue, allowing patients to return to symptom-free physical function and athletic activity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Contralateral hamstring autografts do not provide benefit compared to ipsilateral hamstring autografts in primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the clinical outcomes of primary or revision ACL reconstruction (ACLR) after contralateral hamstring autografts versus ipsilateral hamstring autograft harvest.

METHODS

Three databases (MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE) were searched from inception to April 27th, 2023 for studies investigating contralateral hamstring autografts in primary or revision ACLR. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, strength measures, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and rates of positive Lachman test, positive pivot-shift test and graft rupture were extracted. PROMs included Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Tegner scores.

RESULTS

Nine studies comprising 371 patients were included in this review. In primary ACLR, there were no significant differences between contralateral and ipsilateral groups in isokinetic hamstring torque in the non-ACLR limb or isokinetic quadriceps torque in both limbs when tested at 60, 90, 120 or 180 degrees/second. Isokinetic hamstring torque in the non-ACLR limb was significantly weaker in the contralateral group at six months for primary ACLR; however, these deficits did not persist. There were no significant differences in postoperative median Tegner scores and Lysholm scores between contralateral and ipsilateral groups in primary ACLR. There were no significant differences in postoperative median Tegner, mean Lysholm and IKDC scores between groups in revision ACLR. There were no significant differences in positive Lachman, positive pivot-shift and rupture rates in primary ACLR between groups. Rates of positive Lachman and pivot-shift were slightly higher in the contralateral than ipsilateral group for revision ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Contralateral hamstring autografts results in comparable muscle strength to ipsilateral hamstring autografts, with the exception of weaker hamstring strengths in the early postoperative period. Patient-reported outcome measures were similar between the two groups across both primary and revision ACLR, with rates of instability and failure being similar between groups for primary ACLR. Contralateral hamstring grafts do not provide additional benefit when compared to ipsilateral options for either primary or revision ACLR, and should be used only in select circumstances including insufficient ipsilateral hamstring grafts or situations where quadriceps or patella autografts are not optimal.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

No Deficits in Functional Outcomes of the Contralateral Limb Are Seen When the Hamstring Is Harvested for Augmentation of Small Diameter Ipsilateral Hamstring Autograft

Purpose

To evaluate clinical outcomes of the contralateral, nonoperative limb in patients undergoing contralateral hamstring (HS) autograft harvest compared with patients undergoing ipsilateral HS autograft harvest alone.

Methods

This study included 96 patients who underwent isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using 4-stranded HS autograft (n = 85) or 4-stranded HS autograft augmented with contralateral HS (n = 13) due to inclusion of ipsilateral graft diameter <8 mm. Isokinetic flexion and extension strength and dynamic performance of the ipsilateral and contralateral limbs and limb symmetry index (LSI) were evaluated at 6 months' postoperatively. Rates of contralateral native ACL tear at minimum 2 years also were compared. For all comparisons, P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Normalized isokinetic knee flexion and extension strength of the contralateral limb did not differ between cohorts (P = .34; P = .21, respectively). LSI for knee extension peak torque and knee flexion peak torque did not differ between cohorts (P = .44; P = .67, respectively). No difference in LSI was seen for any dynamic performance testing (single leg hop, P = .97; triple leg hop, P = .14; 6-m timed hop, P = .99). No difference was observed in International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .99) or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale measures (P = .39-.86). No difference in rates of contralateral knee native ACL tears were seen between cohorts (HS autograft + contralateral HS augmentation, n = 2, 15.4%; HS autograft, n = 7, 8.4%; P = .26).

Conclusions

In this study, at the time of return to sport, we found no differences in contralateral limb functional performance or limb symmetry measurements between patients undergoing contralateral HS autograft harvest for augmentation of smaller (<8 mm) diameter HS autografts harvested from the injured extremity.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Contralateral grafts have comparable efficacy to ipsilateral grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either contralateral or ipsilateral tendon autografts.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature published from inception to December 9, 2022, in multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) was conducted in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews) guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted the data, performed the risk of bias assessment and assessed the study quality. At least one of the following outcomes was evaluated for each study: muscle strength (isometric strength of the quadriceps or hamstring muscles, isokinetic peak flexion torque of the hamstring, or isokinetic peak extension torque of the hamstring), knee laxity examination, Lysholm score, pivot shift, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lachman test result, return to sports time, or incidence of complications. A random effects model was used for all analyses.

RESULTS

Four hundred scientific manuscripts were recovered in the initial search. After screening, 12 studies (2 randomized controlled trials, 9 cohort studies, and 1 case- control study) met the search criteria for the qualitative analysis. Among them, 9 cohort studies were used for the quantitative analysis. The results showed few statistically significant differences in terms of muscle strength (contralateral group versus ipsilateral group or donor site group versus ipsilateral group or donor site group versus nonoperative group), Lysholm score, and return to sports time. A comparison showed no significant differences in knee laxity, IKDC score, Tegner activity score, Lachman test score, or incidence of complication, or contralateral rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

In anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, the contralateral autologous tendon has a similar effect as the ipsilateral autologous tendon.

Graft choices for paediatric anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: State of the art

The paediatric population is at particularly high risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries due to high rates of sports participation. Other risk factors for ACL injuries in children include but are not limited to being female, generalised ligamentous laxity, a high body mass index (BMI), and poor neuromuscular control. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) is commonly done to treat ACL injuries and allow for return to sports and daily activities. ACL repair is another option with ongoing techniques being developed. The high rates of graft failure in children reported in recent publications on ACL repair are very concerning. Special consideration must be taken in ACLR in the skeletally immature patient due to the risk of growth-related complications, such as limb deformity or growth arrest, that can arise from drilling across or disrupting the physis. Graft choices for paediatric ACLR include iliotibial band (ITB) over the top and over the front, hamstring autograft, bone patellar tendon bone (BTB) autograft, quadriceps tendon autograft, and allograft. Factors for each graft choice to consider include graft size, graft failure rates, donor site morbidity, requirement for bony tunnels, the post-op rehabilitation process, and return to sport outcomes. Each graft has its benefits and disadvantages for the individual patient, depending on age, skeletal maturity, and goals for recovery. Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is another option to consider with paediatric ACLR because LET has been shown to decrease the re-rupture rate in adult ACLR. After surgery, patient follow-up until at least the growth plates are closed is important. This article aims to provide an overview and comparison of the various graft types to aid in the graft choice decision making process for paediatric ACLR.

The Development of a Return to Performance Pathway Involving A Professional Soccer Player Returning From A Multi-Structural Knee Injury: A Case Report

This case report describes a male professional soccer player returning to match play (English Championship League) following a medial meniscectomy that occurred during the course of rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The player underwent a medial meniscectomy eight months into an ACL rehabilitation program and following 10 weeks of rehabilitation successfully returned to competitive first team match play. This report outlines description of the pathology, the rehabilitation progressions, and the sports specific performance requirements of the player as they progressed through the return to performance pathway (RTP). The RTP pathway included nine distinct phases with evidenced based criteria required to exit each phase. The first five phases were indoor as the player progressed from the medial meniscectomy, through the rehabilitation pathways to the "gym exit Phase". The gym exit Phase was assessed with multiple criteria: a) capacity; b) strength; c) isokinetic dynamometry (IKD); d) hop test battery; e) force plate jumps; and f) supine isometric hamstring rate of force (RFD) development qualities to evaluate the players readiness to start sport specific rehabilitation. The last four phases of the RTP pathway are designed to regain the maximal physical capabilities (plyometric and explosive qualities) in the gym and included the retraining of on-field sport specific qualities utilizing the 'control-chaos continuum.' The player successfully returned to team play in the ninth and final phase of the RTP pathway. The purpose of this case report was to outline a RTP for a professional soccer player who successfully restored specific injury criteria (strength, capacity and movement quality), physical capabilities (plyometric and explosive qualities). and on-field sport specific criteria utilizing the 'control-chaos continuum.'

Level of Evidence

Level 4.

No differences found in long-term outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing ipsilateral versus contralateral hamstring graft in ACL reconstruction

PURPOSE

Contralateral graft harvest in primary ACL reconstruction is relatively uncommon and the long-term comparative of this approach relative to ipsilateral harvest has not been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ACL graft and contralateral rupture following ipsilateral or contralateral semitendinosus and gracilis (STG) graft harvest at follow-up of a minimum 10 years post-reconstruction in the treatment of a complete ACL tear.

METHODS

Patients from a previous randomized trial were evaluated. The primary outcome measures were ipsilateral and contralateral reinjury as well as the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee assessment form, the ACL Quality of Life questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the Tegner activity scale. Participants completed four different single-leg hop tests and concentric knee flexion and extension strength were assessed on an isokinetic dynamometer.

RESULTS

Of the original 100 patients, 50 patients (41.3 ± 9.5 years of age, 31 males, 19 females) reported on re-injury at 12.6 ± 1.4 years post-operative. Thirty-eight patients returned for full assessment and 12 responded by mail or phone survey. There were no differences between groups for graft rupture, contralateral injury, ACL-QoL score, IKDC categorization, or anterior tibial translation, though both groups experienced a reduction in the Tegner Activity Scale from their preinjury scores. There was no difference in knee flexor and extensor isokinetic concentric strength, or single leg hop test performance. Knee flexor strength limb symmetry index was reduced when measured in the supine relative to the seated position in both groups, indicating persistent deficits in knee flexor strength when measured in the supine position.

CONCLUSION

Contralateral hamstring harvest does not put patients at an increased risk of a contralateral ACL tear and long-term outcomes of ACL reconstruction do not differ based on the side of graft harvest. Contralateral STG harvest may provide a safe alternative surgical option for select patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.