Combined clinical test and magnetic resonance imaging have similar diagnostic values in the diagnosis of subscapularis tear

Assessing subscapularis tears: Relationship between special tests and pain & tear severity

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study is to examine the association between special tests for subscapularis tears and both pain and tear severity.

METHODS

Nine hundred and two patients (145 with isolated lesions and 757 with combined lesions) diagnosed with arthroscopically confirmed subscapularis tears between 2010 and 2022. Subscapularis tear severity was classified according to Lafosse classification type I, II, III and IV. Preoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score at rest of the patients, flexion and abduction range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder and the results of the Lift-off test (LOT), Belly Press test (BPT), Bear Hug test (BHT), and Empty Can test (ECT) were documented.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of LOT in isolated and combined tears was 70.3 % and 69.5 %, 45.6 % and 41.2 % of BPT, 72.1 % and 72.6 % of BHT, 81.2 % and 84.1 % of ECT, respectively. There was no association between the severity of the subscapularis tear and the sensitivity in all special tests (p > 0.05). Only the ECT was observed to be associated with pain in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 33.1, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The special tests used to evaluate subscapularis tears are neither sensitive to the severity of the tear nor to pain except for ECT. BHT is the most successful test to detect any subscapularis tear in both isolated and combined tears. Pain severity was related to the presence of a rotator cuff lesion accompanying subscapularis lesion, but not with the severity of subscapularis or remaining rotator cuff tear.

STUDY DESIGN

Levels of Evidence III, cross-sectional archive study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Since the study was a retrospective archive study, there was no clinical trial registration.

Higher Upper Subscapularis Goutallier Grade and Coracohumeral Distance Narrowing Are Predictive of Subscapularis Tears in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relation between subscapularis (SSC) Goutallier grade or coracohumeral distance (CHD) and SSC tears, as well as the relation between these radiographic variables and long head of the biceps tendon lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on prospectively maintained data on patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of SSC tears between 2011 and 2021 with at least 6 months of follow-up. Patients with identified subscapularis tears during arthroscopy were included. A control group was established by randomly selecting patients without SSC tears from the same study period. Goutallier grading and CHD were obtained from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to define optimal cutoff values for these diagnostic measures.

RESULTS

The study included 735 patients with SSC tears and 249 patients in the control group. Comparing subscapularis tear and intact groups' Goutallier grades revealed significant differences in infraspinatus, upper and lower SSC, and overall SSC (P < .001). No significant difference was detected in supraspinatus Goutallier grade (P = .364). An SSC tear was observed in 58.3% (n = 265) of patients with Goutallier grade 0 of the upper SSC, 77.1% (n = 195) of patients with grade 1 changes, 98.7% (n = 155) with grade 2 changes, and 100% of grade 3 or 4 changes. Goutallier grade of the upper SSC showed a significant correlation with tear size (rs = 0.533; P < .01). CHD measurements were lower in individuals with SSC tears compared to those without tears (6.6 ± 1.7 vs 9.6 ± 1.8; P < .001). Upper SSC Goutallier grade >1 had an acceptable area under the curve (AUC) of 0.742. CHD of 7.96 mm or less had an excellent predictive AUC of 0.879.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher Goutallier grade and CHD narrowing are potential associations predictive of SSC tears. Routine MRI assessment of muscle of the upper SSC and the CHD can contribute to the diagnostic accuracy of SSC tears and offer valuable information regarding the severity of such tears.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

Diagnostic Performance of Belly-Press Angle in Predicting the Severity of Subscapularis Tear

BACKGROUND

Neglected partial subscapularis tears often cause functional impairment even after repair of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tear is done. Numerous physical examinations for detecting partial subscapularis tears have been described in previous studies.

PURPOSE

To analyze the relationship between the preoperative clinical features and the severity of a partial subscapularis tear and to provide diagnostic clues for patients requiring subscapularis repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 286 patients who underwent arthroscopic shoulder surgery between 2020 and 2022. Preoperative clinical features, including range of motion, functional scores, muscle strength ratio, modified belly-press test (measuring belly-press angle), and bear-hug test, were collected. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation was done according to the Yoo and Rhee classification. Types of subscapularis tear, supraspinatus lesion, and biceps lesion were recorded during arthroscopic surgery. A comparison of preoperative clinical features between the no-repair group (type 2A or less) and surgical repair group (type 2B or more) was done. The optimal cutoff value of the belly-press angle was determined and the diagnostic performance of the belly-press angle, bear-hug test, and MRI were evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Among 286 patients, 189 (66.1%) had subscapularis tears with type 2A or more. There was a significant difference in muscle strength ratio of the belly-press (P < .001), belly-press angle (P < .001), and bear-hug test (P < .001) between the no-repair group (type 2A or less) and the surgical repair group (type 2B or more). With a belly-press angle of 15° as a new cutoff value, the modified belly-press test showed 67.6% sensitivity, 73.9% specificity, and 69.6% accuracy in detecting type 2B or higher subscapularis tear.

CONCLUSION

Patients with type 2A and 2B subscapularis tears (according to the Yoo and Rhee classification) showed differences in belly-press strength ratio, belly-press angle, and bear-hug test. The cutoff value of the 15° belly-press angle showed an accuracy of 69.6% in detecting subscapularis tears with type 2B or higher.

Machine learning model successfully identifies important clinical features for predicting outpatients with rotator cuff tears

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to develop a machine learning model to identify important clinical features related to rotator cuff tears (RCTs) using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for efficiently predicting outpatients with RCTs.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a local clinical registry dataset was performed to include patients with shoulder pain and dysfunction who underwent questionnaires and physical examinations between 2019 and 2022. RCTs were diagnosed by shoulder arthroscopy. Six machine-learning algorithms (Stacking, Gradient Boosting Machine, Bagging, Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boost (XGBoost), and Adaptive Boosting) were developed for the prediction. The performance of the models was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier scores, and Decision curve. The interpretability of the predicted outcomes was evaluated using Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) values.

RESULTS

A total of 1684 patients who completed questionnaires and clinical tests were included, and 417 patients with RCTs underwent shoulder arthroscopy. In six machining learning algorithms for predicting RCTs, the accuracy, AUC values, and Brier scores were in the range of 0.81-0.86, 0.75-0.92, and 0.15-0.19, respectively. The XGBoost model showed superior performance with accuracy, AUC, and Brier scores of 0.85(95% confidence interval, 0.82-0.87), 0.92 (95% confidence interval,0.90-0.94), and 0.15 (95% confidence interval,0.14-0.16), respectively. The Shapley plot showed the impact of the clinical features on predicting RCTs. The most important variables were Jobe test, Bear hug test, and age for prediction, with mean SHAP values of 1.458, 0.950, and 0.790, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The machine learning model successfully identified important clinical variables for predicting patients with RCTs. In addition, the best algorithm was also integrated into a digital application to provide predictions in outpatient settings. This tool may assist patients in reducing their pain experience and providing prompt treatments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The scissors sign: a provocative test for detecting the leading-edge tear of subscapularis tendon: a diagnostic study

BACKGROUND

Several physical examination tests and signs have been described to aid in the diagnosis of subscapularis (SSC) tear, but have limitations and variable sensitivity. This study aimed to introduce a novel test for detecting a leading-edge tear of the subscapularis (LETS), the most important tendinous portion of SSC.

METHODS

A total of 233 patients who underwent arthroscopic repair for anterior and superior cuff tears between January 2018 to September 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The provocative test we have coined as the "scissors sign" and the other related clinical tests (i.e., belly press, belly off, Napoleon, lift off, internal rotation lag, bear hug tests) were performed preoperatively. Whether the patient has a LETS or the complete tear of the SSC (CTS) was confirmed by arthroscopic findings. Sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test.

RESULTS

In patients who had LETS with or without supraspinatus tear, the scissors sign showed the highest sensitivity (91.4%) with a specificity of 81.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 80.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.1%. In patients with isolated LETS, the scissors sign also showed the highest sensitivity (90.3%) with a specificity of 81.6%, PPV of 57.1%, and NPV of 96.8%. The scissors sign for the complete tear of the subscapularis (CTS) with or without supraspinatus tear and the isolated CTS had a sensitivity of 73.1 and 75%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The scissors sign is a novel provocative test that can be helpful in the diagnosis of subscapularis tears, especially LETS, with its high sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy. In combination with other tests, the scissors sign will be a good screening tool.

The internal rotation and shift-test for the detection of superior lesions of the rotator cuff: reliability and clinical performance

Background

Using reliable and valid clinical tests are essential for proper diagnosis and clinical outcomes among injuries involving the rotator cuff. The addition of a new clinical examination test could improve the clinical diagnosis and informative value of the sensitivity and specificity of pathology. This study of diagnostic accuracy evaluated the use of a new rotator cuff test, called the internal rotation and shift-test (IRO/shift-test), to determine its reliability and clinical performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV)/negative predictive value (NPV)). Clinical diagnostic outcomes were confirmed with radiological findings (MRI).

Methods

100 patients from a specialized shoulder unit participated (64 male, 36 female, mean age: 55 ± 13.5 years). A single-blinded (no knowledge of prior clinical or technical diagnostics) study design was used with two experienced physicians performing the IRO/shift-test. For clinical performance, all clinical testing was compared with MRI.

Results

The intra-rater (ICC = 0.73, 95% CI: 60-82) and inter-rater (ICC = 0.89, 95% CI: 81-94) coefficients for the IRO/shift-test showed good-to-excellent reliability. 75% of the patients showed a positive IRO/shift-test, while 65% had a radiologically diagnosed superior rotator cuff tear. 60% of these patients had both a positive IRO/shift-test and objective rotator cuff tear via MRI. The sensitivity of the IRO/shift-test to detect superior rotator cuff lesions based on MRI diagnosis was calculated at 92% (95% CI: 86-99%), while specificity was 67% (95% CI: 50-84%). Predictive values were also found to be high with 86% PPV (95% CI: 78-94%) and 80% NPV (95% CI: 64-96%).

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the IRO/shift-test is a reliable and valid tool for assessing superior rotator cuff pathology. With good-to-excellent intrarater and inter-rater reliability and strong sensitivity and specificity this test should be considered a valuable addition to clinicians' cadre of clinical evaluation tools.

Current concepts review in the management of subscapularis tears

Subscapularis (SSc) is the prime internal rotator of shoulder. It is the most powerful rotator cuff muscle, maintaining the anterior force couple of shoulder. The tears in SSc as any other rotator cuff muscles might result from a traumatic event or more commonly from intrinsic degeneration. With the advent and widespread use of shoulder arthroscopy, SSc tears, which were once considered as "forgotten or hidden lesions" are now being increasingly recognized. Isolated SSc tears are relatively rare. They occur in combinations. Clinically internal rotation can be near normal because of the compensation provided by other internal rotators. It is not uncommon for patients with SSc tear to be normal on routine physical examination. The Bear Hug test (BHT) has high sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of SSc tear. The combined use of BHT with Belly Press Test has been found optimal for diagnosis. US is an accurate and reliable method for diagnosing SSc tears and outperformed MRI in diagnosing partial-thickness SSc tears. The MRI is currently the most advanced imaging available for diagnosis. The specificity is up to 100%. However, the sensitivity is between 36 and 40%. The earliest classification system for SSc tears was by Fox et al. The commonly used classification is by Lafosse et al. The recent system by Yoo et al. is based on the insertion of SSc. The comma sign is gaining importance not only in arthroscopic diagnosis but also in MRI identification and repair of SSc. The mode of management is mainly arthroscopic. The techniques of repair of SSc are continuously progressing. However, there is no clear consensus on the double vs single-row repairs, biceps tendon management, and the role of coracoplasty. Future research must focus on these areas. Reserve shoulder arthroplasty is reserved for salvage in older age groups. Tendon transfers are performed in young active individuals with irreparable tears.