The J-sign and the body mass index determine the disease-specific quality of life in patients with lateral patellar instability

The Influence of Kinesiophobia and Pain Catastrophizing on Disease-Specific Quality of Life in Patients With Recurrent Patellofemoral Instability

BACKGROUND

The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) is a disease-specific, quality of life patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that is valid and reliable in patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability (LPI). Quality of life encompasses the physical, emotional, and psychological aspects of patient functioning and recovery.

PURPOSES

To concurrently validate the BPII 2.0 to the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury Scale (ACL-RSI) in patients presenting with recurrent LPI and to assess baseline values for the PROMs in patients with LPI.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

A total of 107 consecutive patients with recurrent LPI were assessed between January and October 2021. Patients completed the BPII 2.0, TSK-11, PCS, and ACL-RSI. A Pearson r correlation coefficient was employed to examine relationships between the PROMs. Baseline values, as well as floor and ceiling effects and Cronbach alpha, were assessed for all PROMs.

RESULTS

All 107 patients completed the 4 PROMs. Patients included 28 men (26.2%) and 79 women (73.8%), with a mean (SD) age of 25.7 (9.8) years. The mean (SD) age at first dislocation was 14.8 (6.3) years. The TSK-11, PCS, and ACL-RSI were all statistically significantly correlated with the BPII 2.0 (P < .01; 2-tailed), with moderate correlations (r = -0.361-0.628) The R2 values indicated an overlap of the constructs measured by the PROMs.

CONCLUSION

A statistically significant correlation was evident between the BPII 2.0 and the other PROMs. The BPII 2.0 does not explicitly measure kinesiophobia or pain catastrophizing; however, the significant statistical relationship of the TSK-11 and PCS to the BPII 2.0 suggests that this information is being captured and reflected.

Machine-Learning Models Reliably Predict Clinical Outcomes in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To develop a machine-learning model to predict clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) and identify the important predictive indicators.

METHODS

This study included patients who underwent MPFLR from January 2018 to December 2022. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) concurrent bony procedures, (2) history of other knee surgeries, and (3) follow-up period of less than 12 months. Forty-two predictive models were constructed for 7 clinical outcomes (failure to achieve minimum clinically important difference of clinical scores, return to preinjury sports, pivoting sports, and recurrent instability) using 6 machine-learning algorithms (random forest, logistic regression, support vector machine, decision tree, implemented multilayer perceptron, and K-nearest neighbor). The performance of the model was evaluated using metrics such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity. In addition, SHapley Additive exPlanation summary plot was employed to identify the important predictive factors of the best-performing model.

RESULTS

A total of 218 patients met criteria. For the best-performing models in predicting failure to achieve the minimum clinically important difference for Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee, Kujala, and Tegner scores, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and accuracies were 0.884 (good) and 87.3%, 0.859 (good) and 86.2%, 0.969 (excellent) and 97.0%, and 0.760 (fair) and 76.8%, respectively; 0.952 (excellent) and 95.2% for return to preinjury sports; 0.756 (fair) and 75.4% for return to pivoting sports; and 0.943 (excellent) and 94.9% for recurrent instability. Low preoperative Tegner score, shorter time to surgery, and absence of severe trochlear dysplasia were significant predictors for return to preinjury sports, whereas the absence of severe trochlear dysplasia and patellar alta were significant predictors for return to pivoting sports. Older age, female sex, and low preoperative Lysholm score were highly predictive of recurrent instability.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive models developed using machine-learning algorithms can reliably forecast the clinical outcomes of MPFLR, particularly demonstrating excellent performance in predicting recurrent instability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Preoperative subjective assessment of disease-specific quality of life significantly influenced the likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after surgical stabilization for recurrent lateral patellar instability

PURPOSE

To evaluate which factors exert a predictive value for not reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in patients who underwent a tailored operative treatment for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (RLPD).

METHODS

A total of 237 patients (male/female 71/166; 22.4 ± 6.8 years) were included. The Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and subjective rating of knee function and pain (numeric analogue scale [NAS]; 0-10) were used to evaluate patients' outcomes from pre- to postoperatively. Gender, age at the time of surgery, body mass index (BMI), nicotine abuse, psychiatric diseases, cartilage status and pathoanatomic risk factors were evaluated as potential predictors for achieving the MCID using univariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

The MCID for the BPII 2.0 was calculated at 9.5 points. Although the BPII 2.0 and NAS for knee function and pain improved significantly in the total cohort from pre- to postoperatively (all p < 0.001), 29 patients did not reach the MCID at the final follow-up. The analysis yielded that only the preoperative NAS for function and BPII 2.0 score values were significant predictors for reaching the MCID postoperatively. The optimal threshold was calculated at 7 (NAS function) and 65.2 points (BPII 2.0). Age at the time of surgery should be considered for patients with a preoperative BPII 2.0 score >62.5.

CONCLUSION

The probability of reaching BPII 2.0 MCID postoperatively depends only on the preoperative BPII 2.0 value and subjective rating of knee function, as well as age at the time of surgery for patients undergoing surgical treatment of RLPD. Here, presented results can assist clinicians in advising and presenting patients with potential outcomes following treatment for this often complex and multifactorial pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

What is the J-sign and why is it important?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability is a complex condition that requires a thorough evaluation to optimize treatment. The J-sign test is classically part of the physical examination, but its significance and importance remain unclear. This review aims to describe how to perform the test and classify the observation as well as to analyze the most recent literature on its clinical applications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The J-sign test has been described as positive (present) or negative (absent), and classified using the quadrant method and the Donnell classification. Suboptimal inter-rater reliability has been shown for both classifications, making comparison between clinicians and studies challenging. The J-sign is most predominantly associated with patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, lateral force vector, and rotational abnormalities. A growing number of studies have shown a correlation between a positive J-sign and lower clinical outcome scores and higher rate of surgical failure.

SUMMARY

The J-sign is an important aspect of the physical examination in patients with recurrent lateral patellofemoral instability. Although there is no consensus on how to perform or classify the test, it can be used as a marker of severity of patellofemoral instability and is one of the tools available to guide the treatment plan.

When Should Bony Correction Be Considered in Addition to Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction? Results of a Clinically Derived 2-Group Classification of Lateral Patellar Instability Based on 122 Patients at 2- to 5-Year Follow-up

Background

The need for concomitant bony procedures to realign pathoanatomic risk factors in addition to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) remains unclear.

Purpose

To evaluate a clinically derived 2-part classification of lateral patellar instability aimed at identifying patients indicated for a concomitant bony procedure.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

The study included 122 patients (42 male, 80 female; mean ± SD age, 22 ± 6 years) who were assigned to a mild instability group (mIG) and a complex instability group (cIG) based on the reversed dynamic patellar apprehension test (ReDPAT) and J-sign. The mIG had a positive ReDPAT result <40° to 50° of knee flexion and an absent or low-grade J-sign (grade 1), and the cIG had a positive ReDPAT result >40° of knee flexion and/or a high-grade J-sign (grade 2 or 3). The mIG underwent isolated MPFL-R, and the cIG underwent MPFL-R and concomitant bony procedures depending on the established risk factor assessment. For evaluation, the BANFF Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0 (BPII 2.0) and numeric analog scale (0-10) for patellofemoral pain and subjective knee function were used. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was ascertained by calculating half the standard deviation of baseline scores.

Results

Radiographic analysis confirmed a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation in the cIG regarding severity of trochlear dysplasia, distal malalignment, and patellar height (all P < .05). At final follow-up, no patellar redislocation occurred in either group; 2 patients in the cIG reported patellar subluxation. Within both groups, all outcome scores improved significantly pre- to postoperatively (all P < .0001); no between-group difference was found regarding BPII 2.0 score and numeric analog scale for function. The minimal clinically important difference for the BPII 2.0 was met by 84% (32/38) of the mIG and 90% (76/84) of the cIG (P = .36), but the cIG experienced more patellofemoral pain than the mIG (1.3 ± 1.6 vs 2.1 ± 2.1; P = .036).

Conclusion

Patients with a high-grade J-sign and/or a positive ReDPAT finding beyond 40° to 50° of knee flexion exhibited a significantly more pronounced pathoanatomic risk factor constellation; however, the correction of modifiable risk factors led to similarly good outcomes to patients who underwent isolated MPFL-R. A slightly higher level of patellofemoral pain after bony procedures was evident in these patients.

Management of the first episode of traumatic patellar dislocation: an international survey

PURPOSE

This international survey aimed to evaluate the potential controversies regarding the management of first patellar dislocation amongst experienced knee surgeries in the treatment of the first episode of patellar dislocation without osteochondral fragments.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted from February 2021 to December 2021 to assess the global trend in the diagnosis and management of first-time patellar dislocation without osteochondral fragments. The online survey was accessible on the homepage of the website of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA). The questionnaire consisted of multiple-choice questions and was divided into three sections. The first section consisted of eight questions regarding demographic information, professional activity, and responder experience. The second section consisted of 13 questions regarding the approach to a first patellar dislocation (clinical examination, imaging, and rehabilitation). The third section contained 2 questions concerning the relevance of patient characteristics to the therapeutic algorithm (age, sports, and pathoanatomical predisposing risk factors).

RESULTS

A total of 438 orthopaedic surgeons worldwide completed the questionnaire. At the first approach to diagnose a first-time patellar dislocation, 251 (57%) of the surgeons requested plain radiographs, and 158 (36%) requested magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In conservatively treated patients, 368 (84%) of the respondents recommended the use of a knee brace. Amongst them, 14 (3%) advocated its use for one week, 75 (17%) for two weeks, 123 (28%) for three weeks, 105 (24%) for four weeks, and 97 (22%) for six weeks. In conservatively treated patients, 215 (49%) of the surgeons recommended load to tolerance, 148 (34%) recommended 30% to 60% of the bodyweight, and 75 (17%) advised against weight-bearing. More than half of the surgeons considered a patient aged less than 35 years practising contact sports to be a candidate for the medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) procedure. In addition, a tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove distance (TT-TG) distance of 15 to > 20 mm (for > 75% of the surgeons) and a trochlea types C and D (for > 70% of the surgeons) were considered possible indications for direct surgical management.

CONCLUSION

At the first approach to diagnose a first-time patellar dislocation, plain radiographs and MRI should be performed. In conservatively treated patients, most of the surgeons recommend weight-bearing to tolerance and a knee brace during the first four weeks, with range of motion of full extension to 30° during the first 15 days and up to 60° for an additional 15 days. Surgical management should be performed in patients in the second and third decades of life practising contact sports and in those patients who present types C and D trochlea dysplasia and patella alta.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

[Mid-term effectiveness analysis of combined knee extensor mechanism realignment with bone anchor for recurrent patella dislocation]

Objective

To explore the mid-term effectiveness of combined knee extensor mechanism realignment with bone anchor for recurrent patella dislocation.

Methods

Between August 2017 and May 2019, 21 patients with recurrent patella dislocation underwent combined knee extensor mechanism realigament with bone anchor and followed up more than 3 years. There were 8 males and 13 females with an average age of 19.4 years (range, 13-26 years). All 21 patients had a history of recurrent patellar dislocation for 2-5 times (median, 3 times), and the disease duration was 1-16 years (mean, 5 years). The preoperative Lysholm score was 67.5±6.3 and the Kujula score was 64.1±7.0. The defect of meniscus, anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, and medial and lateral collateral ligaments were excluded by MRI examination; CT examination showed that the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance was 2.05-2.56 cm, with an average of 2.16 cm; X-ray examination showed that lower limb force line was abnormal. The effectiveness were evaluated by Lysholm score and Kujula score before operation and at 3 years after operation, and Insall evaluation standard at 3 years after operation.

Results

All the incisions healed by first intention, and there was no surgical complication such as lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, incision infection, and nerve injury. All 21 patients were followed up 3.0-3.5 years, with an average of 3.2 years. Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of the knee joint at 3 years after operation showed that the position of the patella was normal, and the axial X-ray films of the patella (30°, 60°, 90°) showed that the patellofemoral joint had a good relationship. During the follow-up, there was no anchor drop or fracture, no obvious pseudarthrosis formation, and no epiphyseal injury in the minor patients. The Lysholm score was 91.5±7.1 and the Kujula score was 88.1±7.6 at 3 years after operation, which were significantly improved when compared with those before operation ( t=11.57, P=0.00; t=12.78, P=0.00). According to the Insall evaluation criteria, 12 cases were excellent, 4 cases were good, 4 cases were fair, and 1 case was poor, with an excellent and good rate of 76.2%.

Conclusion

Combined knee extensor mechanism realignment with bone anchor is a simple and reliable way to treat the recurrent patella dislocation, with a satisfactory mid-term effectiveness and less complications; however, its long-term effectiveness needs further follow-up.

Mental and physical health-related quality of life in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations-a generic and disease-specific quality of life questionnaire assessment

Purpose

There is a paucity of quality of life (QoL) assessments in studies evaluating patients treated for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether mental well-being is impaired in patients with chronic (recurrent) LPD and, if so, to assess whether the mental health-related QoL dimension improves equivalently to the physical-related QoL dimension after successful surgical treatment.

Methods

Thirty-eight patients with recurrent LPD over a mean course of the disease of 4.7 ± 3.9 years (1—18 years) prior to surgery were included. Generic health-related QoL (HRQoL) (Short Form 36; SF-36) and disease-specific QoL (Banff Patella Instability Instrument 2.0; BPII 2.0) were assessed preoperatively and after a mean follow-up of 3.5 ± 0.8 years (2 – 5 years) postoperatively.

Results

Untreated LPD significantly impacted the physical dimension of patients’ generic HRQoL and their disease-specific QoL. When compared to age-equivalent normative data sets, the mental HRQoL dimension was not reduced prior to operative treatment but increased during the follow-up period. Surgical treatment normalized the physical dimension of patients’ generic HRQoL and significantly improved their disease-specific QoL. However, BPII 2.0 values remained reduced, albeit patellae were successfully stabilized.

Conclusion

The results of this study indicate that patients with recurrent LPD are generally in good mental health, although physical impairment is striking. Notwithstanding that surgery prevented further dislocations and normalized the generic HRQoL, the disease-specific QoL remained reduced as far as this can be interpreted without population-based data.

Level of evidence

Level IV; Retrospective case series.

[Primary and recurrent patellar dislocation: recommendation for diagnostic evaluation, risk stratification and treatment]

The dogma that (every) primary patellar dislocation should be treated non-operatively is considered outdated. Therefore, every first-time dislocation, as well as every recurrent dislocation, should be fully diagnosed with regard to the injury pattern and anatomically predisposing risk factors. This enables the use of risk stratification models to assess the risk of recurrent episodes of instability, thereby supporting the clinical decision-making process. The reconstruction of the MPFL can be considered an established and successful treatment strategy for patellar instability. However, the additional correction of bony risk factors is often useful. In this context, the preoperative grading of the J sign and dynamic assessment of patellar instability (dynamic apprehension test) are of utmost importance. These findings, combined with the radiographic imaging findings, can be used as a clinical decision aid for a bony correction procedure.