Rotator cuff repair protected with subacromial balloon spacer shows a low rate of non-healing

Subacromial balloon spacer massive rotator cuff tear treatment systematic review and meta-analysis: Patient selection and physical therapy may be keys to outcome success

PURPOSE

Subacromial balloon spacer implantation (SBSI) efficacy for massive rotator cuff tear treatment was evaluated based on perceived shoulder function, active shoulder mobility, pain, complications and research study methodological quality. The purpose was to better discern the efficacy of this device from both surgical and rehabilitative perspectives to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched (1 January 2010 to 1 June 2024) using 'balloon spacer', 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon spacer', 'shoulder spacer' and 'inspace' terms. Pre-surgery (baseline), 12-month (12-m) and 24-month (24-m) post-SBSI mean changes were compared using one-way ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc tests, and comparative study effect sizes were calculated (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

This review consists of 27 studies with 894 patients (67.8 ± 5 years of age) and 29.4 ± 17-month follow-up. Modified Coleman Methodology Scores (MCMS) revealed fair overall quality (mean = 61.4 ± 11). Constant-Murley scores improved from 34.8 ± 6 (baseline), to 64.2 ± 9 (12-m) and 67.9 ± 8 (24-m) (12-m, 24-m > baseline, p < 0.001). ASES scores improved from 35.1 ± 14 (baseline), to 83.3 ± 7 (12-m) and 81.8 ± 5 (24-m)(12-m, 24-m > baseline, p < 0.001). VAS pain scores improved from 6.6 ± 1 (baseline), to 2.6 ± 1 (12-m) and 2.0 ± 1 (24-m) (12-m, 24-m < baseline, p < 0.001). Flexion increased from 108.5 ± 25° (baseline), to 128.5 ± 30° (12-m) and 151.2 ± 14° (24-m) (24-m > 12-m, baseline, p = 0.01). Abduction increased from 97.7 ± 24° (baseline) to 116.3 ± 23° (12-m) and 142.3 ± 15° (24-m) (24-m > 12-m, baseline, p = 0.02). External rotation (ER) in adduction changed from 33.1 ± 7° (baseline) to 32.5 ± 4° (12-m) and 53.9 ± 9° (24-m)(24-m > 12-m, baseline, p = 0.01). ER at 90° abduction increased from 56.3 ± 3° (baseline) to 83.5 ± 5° (12-m) and 77.1 ± 4° (24-m) (24-m, 12-m > baseline, p = 0.01). Comparison studies, however, displayed insignificant results with small effect sizes.

CONCLUSION

Despite overall fair MCMS scores, at 24-m post-SBSI, shoulder function improved and pain decreased. More rigorous comparative studies, however, revealed insignificant findings. Patients with the potential to re-establish the essential glenohumeral joint force couple that depresses the humeral head on the glenoid fossa and who comply with physical therapy may be more likely to achieve success following SBSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer Does Not Reduce the Retear Rate for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To determine whether a subacromial spacer decreases the recurrent rotator cuff tear rate in arthroscopically managed massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) with 1 year of follow-up.

METHODS

We selected all patients who met the following criteria: (1) an MRCT excluding Collin type A, (2) Goutallier stage equal or less than 2, and (3) complete arthroscopic repair of the MRCT. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: A (without subacromial spacer) or B (with subacromial spacer) for a prospective evaluation 1 year after surgery. The primary outcome was the retear rate, determined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to the classification of Sugaya. Secondary outcome measures were the functional outcomes using visual analog score, Shoulder Subjective Value, and Constant-Murley Score. Preoperative rotator cuff characteristics such as number of tendons involved and the tear retraction also were evaluated. Patient-related data such as sex, age, laterality, history of smoking, and diabetes mellitus were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 31 patients were included in group A and 33 in group B. Preoperatively, only 2 differences were found between both groups: a significant (but not clinical) greater Constant score in group A (P = .034) and a slightly greater retraction of the supraspinatus in group B (P = .0025). The overall retear rate between the 2 groups was similar regarding the number of patients (P = .746) and the total number of tendons involved in the recurrent tear (P = .112). At 1-year follow-up, no differences were found in VAS (P = .397), SSV (P = .309), and Constant score (P = .105).

CONCLUSIONS

In reparable massive rotator cuff tears (excluding Collin type A), the augmentation of repair with a subacromial spacer did not significantly reduce the number of patients with recurrent rotator cuff tears identified by MRI. It was also ineffective in reducing the number of re-ruptured tendons in these patients. No patient-reported or clinically significant findings were noted in Constant, SSV, and VAS scores at 1-year postoperative follow-up. Patients with MRI findings of a healed rotator cuff (Sugaya 1-3) had better clinical outcomes compared with those without.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer Implantation Is a Promising Alternative for Patients With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of the existing literature on subacromial balloon spacers for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, in an effort to inform surgeons of the procedure's clinical effectiveness.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid EMBASE databases were queried to identify studies evaluating the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of patients indicated for subacromial balloon spacer implantation. The following datapoints were extracted: study demographics, patient baseline characteristics, and postoperative outcomes of interest. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at the longest available follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total 766 patients were included among 22 included studies, with an average follow-up of 27.54 months. Improvements were seen for all clinical and patient-reported outcomes: forward elevation (ranging from 9.20 to 90.00° improvement), external rotation (ranging from 2.00 to 22.00°), abduction (ranging from 14.00 to 95.00°), Total Constant Score (ranging from 7.70 to 50.00), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ranging from 24.60 to 59.84), Oxford Shoulder Score (ranging from 7.20 to 22.20), and pain score (ranging from 3.57 to 6.50). Minimal differences were seen in acromiohumeral interval (ranging from -2.00 to 1.27). Reoperation and complication rates ranged from 0% to 33% and 0% to 19.64%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term results of subacromial balloon spacers for management of massive rotator cuff tears demonstrate clinically relevant improvements in shoulder range of motion and substantial improvements in patient-reported outcome measures. Of note, minimal change in acromiohumeral interval was seen on postoperative radiography, and wide variations in complication and reoperation rates were reported across studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear With Medialization and Balloon Spacer Insertion

Retracted massive rotator cuff tears can be challenging to repair. Reduction of the retracted tendon to the native footprint may result in a repair with excessive tension. Repair under excessive tension predisposes to increased tendon retear rates. Footprint medialization involves securing the tendon medial to the anatomic footprint, resulting in decreased tension during repair. Several surgical adjuncts can also be employed to reinforce such tears so as to reduce the risk of retear. The aim of this Technical Note is to describe a surgical technique of rotator cuff repair with medialization of the footprint combined with a balloon spacer insertion.

Evaluation of spin in reviews of biodegradable balloon spacers for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears

HYPOTHESIS

Clinical studies are often at risk of spin, a form of bias where beneficial claims are overstated while negative findings are minimized or dismissed. Spin is often more problematic in abstracts given their brevity and can result in the misrepresentation of a study's actual findings. The goal of this study is to aggregate primary and secondary studies reporting the clinical outcomes of the use of subacromial balloon spacers in the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears to identify the incidence of spin and find any significant association with study design parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Independent searches were completed on 2 databases (PubMed and Embase) for primary studies, systematic and current concepts reviews, and meta-analyses and the results were compiled. Two authors independently screened the studies using a predetermined inclusion criteria and aggregated data including titles, publication journals and years, authors, study design, etc. Each study was independently assessed for the presence of 15 different types of spin. Statistical analysis was conducted to identify associations between study characteristics and spin.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria for our analysis, of which 10 were reviews or meta-analyses and 19 were primary studies. Spin was identified in every study except for 2 (27/29, 93.1%). Type 3 spin, "Selective reporting of or overemphasis on efficacy outcomes or analysis favoring the beneficial effect of the experimental intervention" and type 9 spin, "Conclusion claims the beneficial effect of the experimental treatment despite reporting bias" were most frequently noted in our study, both observed in 12/29 studies (41.4%). Date of publication, and adherence to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses or "The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews" were study characteristics associated with a higher rate of certain types of spin. There was a statistically significant association between disclosure of external study funding source and the presence of spin type 4, but none of the other forms of spin.

CONCLUSION

Spin is highly prevalent in the abstracts of primary studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses discussing the use of subacromial balloon spacer technology in the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Our findings revealed that spin in the abstract tended to favor the balloon spacer intervention. Further efforts are required in the future to mitigate spin within the abstracts of published manuscripts.

Rice-Body Synovitis, Foreign Body Reaction, and Rotator Cuff Failure After Subacromial Balloon Spacer Augmentation of a Rotator Cuff Repair: A Case Report

CASE

A 66-year-old woman presented with shoulder pain and weakness 4 months after augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with a Stryker InSpace subacromial balloon spacer. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a failed rotator cuff repair, large effusion with rice bodies, synovitis, axillary lymphadenopathy, loose anchors, and erosive changes to the greater tuberosity. Arthroscopy revealed balloon fragmentation surrounded by diffusely hyperemic synovium without repairable cuff tissue. Final cultures proved negative for infection. Histologic evaluation revealed ulcerated synovium with diffuse chronic and focal acute inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Despite promising early results, augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with a subacromial balloon spacer introduces a risk of inflammatory reaction that may mimic a deep infection and compromise rotator cuff healing.

Human Dermal Allograft Patch Augmentation of Degenerate Rotator Cuff Tendon Using a Single Lateral-Row Technique

The role of biological augmentation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair surgery has increased over the years. It has shown favorable healing rates and functional outcomes. Patch augmentation is commonly applied in repairs of massively retracted cuff tears, full-thickness tears, revision repair, or open cuff surgery. There is a paucity of literature on the use of patch augmentation when dealing with a chronic degenerate tendon associated with small-sized cuff tears. In recent years, the resorbable bioinductive bovine collagen implant has gained popularity for its application in partial-thickness tears via an isolated bioinductive repair fashion, without traditional rotator cuff repair. These bioinductive implants, albeit promising in their biological properties for tendon repair, lack structural strength and do not confer similar biomechanical advantages as human dermal allograft. We share our surgical technique for an arthroscopic patch augmentation involving human dermal allograft, using a single-lateral row surgical fixation, to address a degenerate cuff tendon with small-sized rotator cuff tear. We believe that our use of a human dermal patch augmentation conferred increased biomechanical advantage and reduced costs while delivering favorable outcomes for patients in our value-driven care.

Combined Margin Convergence Repair and Subacromial Balloon Spacer for the Treatment of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

Background:

Current joint-sparing treatment options for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears aim to prevent superior migration of the humeral head and maintain the subacromial space. Although options such as superior capsular reconstruction and posterosuperior tendon transfer may appropriately restore function and reduce pain, these procedures harbor significant comorbidity and intense postoperative rehabilitation. Recently, studies have demonstrated excellent results from a subacromial balloon spacer composed of a biocompatible copolymer that degrades over the 12 months following implantation. This spacer enables a more anatomic position of the humeral head to restore normal shoulder biomechanics.

Indications:

The subacromial balloon spacer is primarily indicated in patients with massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears who demonstrate proximal humeral migration. Contraindications include subscapularis or teres minor tendon tears, deltoid dysfunction, and pseudoparalysis.

Technique Description:

Standard arthroscopic portals are established, and a diagnostic arthroscopy is performed to assess the glenohumeral joint space and subscapularis tendon. A subacromial bursectomy is performed without proceeding medial to the superior glenoid rim. The subacromial space is measured utilizing an arthroscopic measurement probe to ensure that the selected spacer will lie slightly medial to the glenoid. The rotator cuff is then reapproximated from the lateral to medial aspect of the tear and repaired via a side-to-side manner with high strength, nonabsorbable tape, and a self-capturing suture device. Following repair, the deployment device is inserted through the lateral portal, placed slightly medial to the glenoid, and inflated with saline.

Results:

Utilization of the described subacromial balloon augmentation provides significant pain relief by restoring glenohumeral biomechanics, improvements in range of motion, and an enhancement in quality of life.

Discussion:

This case report and video review of a technique for utilizing a subacromial balloon spacer demonstrates an effective, simple, and safe treatment for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. Positive results rely on appropriate inflation and secure fixation. Recent clinical trial data suggest that functional outcomes for the subacromial balloon spacer are noninferior to that of partial rotator cuff repair. These promising results suggest that the subacromial balloon spacer may prove an essential tool for joint-preserving surgery following massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears.