Inter- and intratester comparison of the Rolimeter knee tester: effect of tester's experience and the examination technique

Digital hand-held arthrometry is a reliable and accurate adjunct for diagnosing acute anterior cruciate ligament tears

Purpose

To evaluate the intrarater reliability and predictive validity of Lachmeter® measurements for diagnosing acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, and to propose diagnostic thresholds.

Methods

Lachmeter® measurements were recorded during the stabilised Lachman test for consecutive participants presenting to an acute knee injury clinic within 21-days of injury. Intrarater reliability for individual limb and side-to-side (STS) difference (injured limb minus uninjured limb) measurements was investigated using a cross-sectional, repeated-measures design and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The predictive validity of STS difference and injured limb measurements was investigated using a prospective cohort design; sensitivity, specificity, negative (LR-) and positive likelihood ratios (LR+) were calculated using magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard.

Results

Intrarater reliability was excellent for individual limb and STS difference measurements in 102 participants. Of the 63 participants included in the validity analysis, 31 had a normal ACL and 32 had an ACL tear. LR- point estimates for STS differences <1.4 mm (0.07 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.29]) or injured limb measurements <7.5 mm (0.09 [95% CI: 0.02-0.34] produced 'large' shifts in the probability of ruling out an ACL tear. LR+ point estimates for STS differences ≥3.8 mm (10.67 [95% CI: 2.68-42.51]) or injured limb measurements ≥11.8 mm (10.67 [95% CI: 1.42-80.26]) produced 'large' shifts in the probability of ruling in a full-thickness ACL tear.

Conclusion

In participants presenting within 21-days of knee injury, intrarater reliability was excellent for Lachmeter® measurements recorded during the stabilised Lachman test. Based on predictive validity estimates, Lachmeter® measurements can be used to differentiate normal from torn ACLs in acute presentations, but not partial from full-thickness ACL tears. Diagnostic thresholds are proposed based on STS difference and injured limb measurements, and with consideration of the Lachman end point. Level of Evidence: Level I.

The Association Between Concomitant Meniscal Tear, Tibial Slope, Static Knee Position, and Anterior Knee Laxity in ACL-Deficient Patients

Background

Whether the tibial slope or the concomitant meniscal tear is related to static knee position or anterior knee laxity remains controversial.

Purpose

To investigate the association between medial and lateral posterior tibial slope, concomitant meniscal tear, static knee position using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and anterior knee laxity measured with the GNRB arthrometer.

Study Design

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

A total of 60 patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions were retrospectively enrolled from May 2020 to October 2022. All patients underwent both MRI and GNRB arthrometry after the injury. The static knee position and medial and lateral tibial slopes were measured using MRI. The meniscal tear type was confirmed during arthroscopic surgery. Descriptive data were retrospectively reviewed from the medical records.

Results

The side-to-side differences of anterior tibial translation at 134 N in the intact meniscus, isolated lateral meniscal tear, isolated medial meniscal tear, and both meniscal tear groups were 3.63 ± 1.4 mm, 4.61 ± 1.5 mm, 2.85 ± 1.5 mm, and 4.85 ± 1.6 mm, respectively (P = .003). The slopes of the force-displacement curve in the GNRB arthrometer were 6.55 ± 4.8 mm/N, 16.99 ± 5.6 mm/N, 9.69 ± 10.8 mm/N, and 10.89 ± 7.4 mm/N in the intact meniscus, lateral meniscal tear, medial meniscal tear, and both meniscal tear groups, respectively (P = .001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with lateral meniscal tears tended to have greater anterior knee laxity based on the GNRB arthrometer tests. The medial and lateral tibial slopes were not correlated with static knee position or anterior knee laxity.

Conclusion

Patients with ACL deficiency and concomitant lateral meniscal tears are more likely to exhibit greater anterior knee laxity, as measured using the GNRB. Clinicians should consider the concomitant lateral meniscal tear when planning surgery and arranging postoperative care. Tibial slopes were not found to be correlated with static knee position or anterior knee laxity.

Arthroscopic Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Primary Repair Restores Anterior Tibial Translation Intraoperatively at Time Zero With No Additional Effect of Suture Augmentation

PURPOSE

To intraoperatively evaluate the ability of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) primary repair (ACLPR) to restore anterior tibial translation (ATT) at time zero and to assess the influence of additional suture augmentation (SA) on ATT.

METHODS

Patients with proximal ACL tears undergoing arthroscopic ACLPR with dual-suture anchor fixation were included in this time-zero clinical study. Laxity measurements were taken with a digital arthrometer to evaluate ATT stability preoperatively in the office (T0) as a standardized diagnostic tool, preoperatively under anesthesia (T1), at time zero intraoperatively after ACLPR but prior to SA fixation (T2), and after SA fixation (T3).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD], 35.1 ± 12.0 years) with proximal ACL tears and significant preoperative (T0) ATT side-to-side differences (SSDs) (mean ± SD, 4.1 ± 1.5 mm) were evaluated. ACLPR was shown to restore ATT SSD at time zero (mean ± SD, 0.2 ± 1.1 mm) given that a significant reduction in ATT SSD (mean difference ± standard error, -4.7 ± 0.21 mm; P < .001) was achieved when comparing preoperative and intraoperative measurements after separate refixation of both ACL bundles with suture anchors. Additional SA fixation did not further decrease ATT when comparing measurements of the ipsilateral leg after ACL refixation and after SA fixation (mean difference ± SD, 0.03 ± 0.22 mm; P = .496).

CONCLUSIONS

ACLPR with dual-suture anchor fixation restores time-zero ATT laxity in adults with proximal ACL tears. Additional SA fixation in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study provides important information about the effectiveness of ACLPR in restoring ATT. SA with the knee fixed in full knee extension does not further decrease ATT; therefore, augmentation may not lead to overconstraint of the knee or stress shielding of the repaired ACL.

Comparison of postoperative clinical outcome in medial-pivotal and gradually reducing radius design cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty-A multicenter analysis of propensity-matched cohorts

Purpose

To clarify differences in surgery duration, postoperative knee range of motion (ROM), anterior and posterior (AP) laxity, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in patients undergoing medial-pivot (MP) and GRADIUS cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries.

Methods

We examined patients who underwent either MP or CR TKA at six different Japanese centres. Patients were propensity score matched for age, sex, and preoperative hip-knee angle (HKA). We compared the groups' average surgery duration, postoperative knee ROM, AP laxity, and FJS 1 year after surgery.

Results

There were 86 study patients: 43 MP and 43 CR TKA matched for age, sex, and preoperative HKA. The MP group enjoyed a significantly shorter surgery duration (89.1 ± 10.9 mins vs. 95.7 ± 12.0 mins, p = 0.0091) and significantly better postoperative knee flexion than the CR group (123.7 ± 9.1° vs. 115.3 ± 12.4°, p < 0.001). The MP had significantly smaller postoperative AP laxity with 30° of knee flexion than the CR group (3.4 ± 1.3 vs. 5.6 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.001). Conversely, postoperative AP laxity with 90° of knee flexion was significantly larger for the MP group (3.6 ± 1.3 vs. 2.7 ± 1.9 mm, p = 0.0098). There were no between-group differences in postoperative FJS.

Conclusions

The MP group showed better postoperative knee flexion, midrange AP knee stability, and shorter surgery duration.

Level of Evidence

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Association between intraoperative findings and postoperative knee range motion after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alleviates pain and improves daily living activities in individuals with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee. However, up to 20% of patients have sub-optimal outcomes after TKA.

OBJECTIVE

No studies have clarified the intraoperative factors that affect postoperative range of motion (ROM) after cruciate-retaining (CR) TKA. Thus, this study aims to clarify these factors.

METHODS

Patients with knee osteoarthritis with varus knee deformity who underwent CR-TKA between May 2019 and December 2020 were included in this study. One year after surgery, patients were stratified into two groups based on knee flexion: Group F (over 120∘) and Group NF (below 120∘). Patient backgrounds including age, body mass index, hip knee angle, preoperative range of motion for both extension and flexion, intraoperative center joint-gap measurements of 0∘, 30∘, 45∘, 60∘, 90∘, and 120∘ of knee flexion using a tensor, intraoperative anterior-posterior (AP) laxity measurements of 30∘ and 90∘ of knee flexion using an instrumental laximeter were compared between the groups. Univariate analyses between the groups were used to construct the initial model. The receiver operating characteristic curve was also analyzed. The predictive variables included in the final model were selected by stepwise backward elimination.

RESULTS

Intraoperative AP laxity with 30∘ of knee flexion smaller than 10.8 mm was a significant positive prognostic factor (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.08-1.79, P= 0.011) of postoperative ROM over 120∘ of knee flexion one year after surgery. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 70.9%, 82.4%, 92.9%, and 46.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative AP laxity smaller than 10.8 mm was a significant positive predictive factor for obtaining knee flexion greater than 120∘ one year after surgery when using CR-TKA and its PPV was high up to 92.9%.

Combined anterior cruciate ligament revision with reconstruction of the antero-lateral ligament does not improve outcome at 2-year follow-up compared to isolated acl revision; a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

It is essential to obtain rotational stability of the knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) and it is suggested that a supplementary reconstruction of the antero-lateral ligament (ALL-R) may supports this. Theoretically, ALL-R may be particularly advantageous to support revision of failed ACL-Rs. It was hypothesized that ACL revision combined with ALL-R will result in superior outcome compared to isolated ACL revision.

METHODS

The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial. Patients eligible for first time ACL revision were randomized to either isolated ACL revision (- ALL group) or ACL revision combined with a single-stranded allograft ALL-reconstruction (+ ALL group). Patient reported outcomes and function were evaluated at two-year follow-up by KNEES-ACL, KOOS, and Tegner activity scale. Objective knee laxity was evaluated at one-year follow-up using an instrumented Rolimeter test, the pivot shift test, and a manual Lachman test.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were enrolled with 49 patients randomized to the + ALL group and 54 patients in the - ALL group. There were no differences at baseline between groups regarding age, gender, body mass index, preoperative patient reported outcome scores and concomitant meniscus or cartilage injury. The ACL revision was performed with an allograft in 10 patients (20%) in the + ALL group and 8 patients (15%) in the -ALL group. At follow-up there was no significant difference between the groups in patient reported outcome scores and clinical knee laxity.

CONCLUSION

Supplementary ALL-R does not improve subjective outcome of first time ACL revision at two-years and clinical knee stability at one-year follow-up compared to isolated ACL revision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Intra-Tester and Inter-Tester Reliability of the Lachmeter When Measuring Knee Joint Laxity

Knee injuries are common among all age groups, and clinical knee examination is essential for the prognosis, follow-up, and rehabilitation process. The Lachmeter is a newly developed digitized modification of the Rolimeter, making it easier and faster for the test personnel to read the test result. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of the Lachmeter when testing healthy and traumatic knees. 24 healthy participants and a smaller sample of six ACL patients were examined with the Lachmeter by two intermediate testers and re-examined on a second visit within 21 days. All measurements were performed using two different grip techniques: a Lachman grip and an anterior drawer grip. Intra- and inter-tester reliability was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), smallest detectable change (SDC), Student's paired t-test, and Bland-Altman plots. The results showed in healthy subjects poor to good intra-tester reliability (ICC range: -0.28-0.87, SEM range: 0.33-1.14 mm, and SDC range: 0.91-3.17 mm) and inter-tester reliability (ICC range: 0.41-0.87, SEM range: 0.27-0.67 mm, and SDC range: 0.75-1.87 mm). In ACL patients, intra-tester reliability was moderate to excellent (ICC range: 0.53-0.94, SEM range: 0.14-0.88 mm, and SDC range: 0.38-2.44 mm), with the exception of one measurement (ICC: 0.26 95% CI [-3.43; 0.89]), whereas inter-tester reliability was overall good (ICC range: 0.61-0.89, SEM range: 0.29-0.71 mm, and SDC range: 0.79-1.97 mm). Reliability measures between grip techniques indicated that the Lachman grip was more reliable than the anterior drawer grip. In conclusion, the Lachmeter showed variation between reliability measures, ranging from poor to good in healthy subjects and moderate to excellent in ACL patients. Future studies are needed to validate the Lachmeter against a gold-standard knee laxity assessment.

Intraoperative Laximetry-Based Selective Transtibial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Concomitant With Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Treating Varus Knee Osteoarthritis With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

High tibial osteotomy (HTO) is used in the treatment of varus knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in young and active patients. At times, a concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency is found, and there is no conclusive evidence comparing the osteotomy options for an ACL-deficient knee despite the popularity of medial opening-wedge (MOW) HTO in varus KOA with ACL deficiency. To minimize the incidence of an unnecessary ACL reconstruction with MOW-HTO, we developed an intraoperative laximetry-based selective technique for transtibial ACL reconstruction concomitant with MOW-HTO using a sterilizable metal laximeter. To successfully use the device required for this procedure, surgeons must understand the proper techniques. Hence, this Technical Note aims to give a comprehensive description of the technique.

The importance of continuous remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Selective anteromedial or posterolateral bundle reconstruction is recognized as a treatment modality in partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with a biomechanically sufficient ACL remnant. However, there is paucity in literature investigating clinical outcomes of standard ACLR with preservation of residual continuous but biomechanically insufficient ACL tissue. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of preservation of residual continuous but biomechanical insufficient ACL tissue in standard ACLR on complication and repeat surgery rate, and patient reported and clinical outcome.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort comprised 134 patients (age 23 ± 7 years; Tegner 6 ± 3) with an isolated acute ACL tear. In 67 patients, residual continuous but biomechanically insufficient ACL tissue was present and preserved based on visual inspection, probing of the ACL tissue and Lachman test under arthroscopic view (standard reconstruction with tissue preservation; SRTP). These patients were matched to 67 patients that underwent ACLR where no residual ACL tissue could be preserved (standard reconstruction; SR) based on gender, age and chondral and/or meniscal status. Clinical failure (recurrent instability, pathological ACL graft laxity and/or ACL graft discontinuity), other complication and repeat-surgery rate within index surgery and 1-year and within index surgery and 2-year follow-up, and patient reported and clinical outcomes at 1-year and at 2-year follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

A statistically significant lower clinical failure rate within index surgery and 1-year (SRTP, 3%; SR, 13%; P = 0.028) and within index surgery and 2-year follow-up (SRTP, 3%; SR, 23%; P = 0.001), and revision ACL surgery rate within index surgery and 1-year (SRTP, 2%; ST, 10%; P = 0.029) and within index surgery and 2-year follow-up (SRTP, 2%; SR, 18%; P = 0.001) was found in the SRTP group. No statistically significant differences were found for other investigated outcomes in patients that were without clinical failure.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that in ACLR surgery, preservation of residual continuous but biomechanical insufficient ACL tissue might lead to lower clinical failure rate and ACL revision surgery rate within index surgery and 1-year, and within index surgery and 2-year follow-up compared to standard ACLR where no residual continuous ACL tissue could be preserved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Comparison of Clinical Result between Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Additional Internal Bracing and Anatomic Single Bundle Reconstruction-A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The current standard of treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction (ACLR). This technique has some disadvantages: poor proprioception, donor site morbidity and the inability to restore joint kinematics. ACL repair could be an alternative treatment. The purpose of the study was to compare the stability and the function after ACL primary repair versus single-bundle ACLR.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 12 patients underwent primary ACL repair with internal bracing, 15 patients underwent standard ACLR. Follow-up examinations were evaluated at up to 2 years postoperatively. One patient in the ACL repair group was lost to follow-up due to re-rupture. The absolute value of anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the side-to-side difference in the same patient (ΔATT) were evaluated using the GNRB arthrometer. The Lysholm knee scoring was obtained. Re-ruptures and other complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was significantly decreased in the ACL repair group compared with the ACLR group (5.31 mm vs. 7.18 mm, respectively; p = 0.0137). Arthrometric measurements demonstrated a mean side-to-side difference (ΔATT) 1.87 (range 0.2 to 4.9) mm significantly decreased compared to ACLR 3.36 (range 1.2-5.6 mm; p = 0.0107). The mean Lysholm score was 85.3 points in the ACL repair group and 89.9 in ACLR group. No significant differences between ACL repair and ACLR were found for the Lysholm score. There was no association between AP laxity and clinical outcomes. There were two complications in the internal bracing group: one patient had re-rupture and was treated by ACLR, another had limited extension and had arthroscopic debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior tibial translation was significantly decreased after ACL repair. Additionally, the functional results after ACL repair with internal bracing were comparable with those after ACLR. It should be noted that the two complications occurred. The current study supports further development of ACL repair techniques.

Flexion deformity and laxity as a function of knee position at the time of tensioning of rigid anatomic hamstring ACL grafts

Background

Anatomic ACL grafts routinely display the anisometric length-tension behaviour seen in the native ligament with maximum length in full knee extension. Recent improvements in hamstring graft preparation and fixation have improved graft rigidity to the point where total graft lengthening after implantation may be less than 1 mm. Despite this it remains common practice to fix these grafts in a knee flexed position.

Methods

Nineteen participants underwent all-inside ACL reconstruction with optimally preconditioned 4 strand semitendinosus grafts using bi-cortical adjustable suspensory loop fixation. Using a computer navigation system, baseline measures of anisometricity, extension range, and tibial rotation were made. The graft was tensioned and provisionally fixed with the knee flexed 5° beyond its anisometric point and extension range recorded. The graft was then definitively fixed with the knee fully extended and extension range and tibial rotation recorded again. Anterior laxity measurements were made pre-operatively and postoperatively using a manual arthrometer and compared to those from the contralateral limb.

Results

Fixing the graft with the knee flexed produced a mean FD of 10.9° (p < 0.0001) and fixing in extension restored full extension (p = 0.661). Fixing in extension restored anterior laxity at 30° (p = 0.224) and at 90° (p = 0.668). There were very strong correlations between post-operative and control extension range (r = 0.931, p < 0.0001) and anterior laxity and 30° (r = 0.830, p < 0.0001) measures. Constraint of tibial internal rotation increased by 2.9° during the pivot-shift (p < 0.001) and increased with pivot shift grade (r = 0.474, p = 0.040).

Conclusion

Fixing rigid anatomic hamstring grafts in a knee flexed position routinely produces a flexion deformity. Tensioning and fixing grafts with the knee fully extended restores full extension and anterior laxity at 30° and 90°. Rotational constraint is significantly improved and correlates with the pivot-shift grade.

Clinical relevance

Rigid anatomic grafts should be tensioned and fixed with the knee fully extended.

Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group

A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect of establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. To establish a standardized assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, in June 2019. The aim was to establish a consensus on what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used, and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. The group reached consensus on 9 statements by using a modified Delphi method. In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into 4 robust categories: early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment after ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained reinjuries, validated knee-specific PROs, and health-related quality of life questionnaires. In the midterm to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.

Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group

PURPOSE

A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed.

METHODS

To establish a standardized approach to assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA; USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories-early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific PROs and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid- to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Study protocol: a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal brace ligament augmentation and reconstruction in individuals with an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: LIBRƎ study

Background

The current gold standard for the treatment of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is reconstruction with tendon graft. Recently, two surgical ACL repair techniques have been developed for treating an acute ACL rupture: Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS, Ligamys®) and Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA, InternalBrace™). We will conduct a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial which compares DIS, IBLA and reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit.

Methods

Subjects, aged 18–50 years, with a proximal, primary and repairable ACL rupture will be included. DIS is preferably performed within 4 weeks post-rupture, IBLA within 12 weeks and reconstruction after 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients are included in study 1 if they present within 0–4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible within 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 1 will be randomized to either DIS or IBLA. Patients are included in study 2 if they present after 4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible between 5 and 12 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 2 will be randomized to either IBLA or reconstruction. A total of 96 patients will be included, with 48 patients per study and 24 patients per study arm. Patients will be followed-up for 2 years. The primary outcome is change from baseline (pre-rupture) in International Knee Documentation Committee score to 6 months post-operatively. The main secondary outcomes are the EQ-5D-5 L, Tegner score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, isokinetic and proprioceptive measurements, magnetic resonance imaging outcome, return to work and sports, and re-rupture/failure rates. The statistical analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. The economic impact of the surgery techniques will be evaluated by the cost-utility analysis. The LIBRƎ study is to be conducted between 2018 and 2022.

Discussion

This LIBRƎ study protocol is the first study to compare DIS, IBLA and ACL reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit. The outcomes of this study will provide data which could aid orthopaedic surgeons to choose between the different treatment options for the surgical treatment of an acute ACL rupture.

Trial registration

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03441295. Date registered 13.02.2018.

Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: Repair or Reconstruction? Two-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Contemporary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) suture repair techniques have been subject to renewed interest in recent years. Although several clinical studies have yielded good short-term results, high-quality evidence is lacking in regard to the effectiveness of this treatment compared with ACL reconstruction.

HYPOTHESIS

Dynamic augmented ACL suture repair is at least as effective as anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction for the treatment of acute ACL rupture in terms of patient self-reported outcomes at 2 years postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

METHODS

After stratification and randomization, 48 patients underwent either dynamic augmented ACL suture repair or ACL reconstruction with a single-bundle, all-inside, semitendinosus technique. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score at 2 years postoperatively was the primary outcome measure. Patient-reported outcomes (IKDC subjective score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Tegner score, visual analog scale for satisfaction), clinical outcomes (IKDC physical examination score, leg symmetry index for the quadriceps, hamstrings strength, and jump test battery), and radiological outcomes as well as adverse events including reruptures were recorded. Analyses were based on an intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

The lower limit for the median IKDC subjective score of the repair group (86.2) fell within the prespecified noninferiority margin, confirming noninferiority of dynamic augmented ACL suture repair compared with ACL reconstruction. No statistical difference was found between groups for median IKDC subjective score (repair, 95.4; reconstruction, 94.3). Overall, 2 reruptures (8.7%) occurred in the dynamic ACL suture repair group and 4 reruptures (19.0%) in the ACL reconstruction group; further, 5 repeat surgeries-other than for revision ACL surgery-took place in 4 patients from the dynamic ACL suture repair group (20.8%) and in 3 patients from the ACL reconstruction group (14.3%).

CONCLUSION

Dynamic augmented ACL suture repair is not inferior to ACL reconstruction in terms of subjective patient-reported outcomes as measured with the IKDC subjective score 2 years postoperatively. However, for reasons other than revision ACL surgery due to rerupture, a higher number of related adverse events leading to repeat surgery were seen in the dynamic augmented ACL suture repair group within 2 years postoperatively.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Dynamic augmented ACL suture repair might be a viable treatment option for patients with an acute ACL rupture.

REGISTRATION

NCT02310854 ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

High-grade rotatory knee laxity may be predictable in ACL injuries

PURPOSE

Lateral compartment acceleration and translation have been used to quantify rotatory knee laxity in the setting of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury; however, their relationship remains elusive. The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between lateral compartment acceleration and translation during pivot shift testing. It was hypothesized that a correlation would exist in ACL-injured and uninjured knees, irrespective of sex, but would be greatest in knees with combined ACL and lateral meniscus tear.

METHODS

Seventy-seven patients (34 females, 25.2 ± 9.0 years) undergoing primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction were prospectively enrolled in a 2-year study across four international centers. Patients underwent preoperative examination under anesthesia of the injured and uninjured knee using Image Analysis software and surface mounted accelerometer.

RESULTS

A moderate correlation between lateral compartment acceleration and translation was observed in ACL-injured knees [ρ = 0.36, p < 0.05), but not in uninjured knees (ρ = 0.17, not significant (n.s.)]. A moderate correlation between acceleration and translation was demonstrated in ACL-injured knees with lateral meniscus tears (ρ = 0.53, p < 0.05), but not in knees with isolated ACL-injury (ρ = 0.32, n.s.), ACL and medial meniscus tears (ρ = 0.14, n.s.), or ACL and combined medial and lateral meniscus tears (ρ = 0.40, n.s.). A moderate correlation between acceleration and translation was seen in males (ρ = 0.51, p < 0.05), but not in females (ρ = 0.21, n.s.). Largest correlations were observed in males with ACL and lateral meniscus tears (ρ = 0.75, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lateral compartment acceleration and translation were moderately correlated in ACL-injured knees, but largely correlated in males with combined ACL and lateral meniscus tears. ACL and lateral meniscus injury in males might, therefore, be suspected when both lateral compartment acceleration and translation are elevated. Surgeons should have a greater degree of suspicion for high-grade rotatory knee laxity in ACL-injured males with concomitant lateral meniscus tears. Future studies should investigate how these two distinct components of rotatory knee laxity-lateral compartment acceleration and translation-are correlated with patient outcomes and affected by ACL surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study; Level of evidence II.

Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is today's surgical gold standard for ACL rupture. Although it provides satisfactory results, not all patients return to their previous activity level and moreover, early posttraumatic osteoarthritis is not prevented. As such, a renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation. Compared to ACL reconstruction, the hypothesized advantages of ACL suture repair are earlier return to sports, reduction of early posttraumatic osteoarthritis and preservation of the patient's native ACL tissue and proprioceptive envelope of the knee. In recent literature, ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation tends to be at least equally effective compared to ACL reconstruction, but no randomized comparative study has yet been conducted.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a prospective, stratified, block randomized controlled trial. Forty-eight patients with an ACL rupture will be assigned to either a suture repair group with dynamic augmentation and microfracture of the femoral notch, or an ACL reconstruction group with autologous semitendinosis graft and all-inside technique. The primary objective is to investigate the hypothesis that suture repair of a ruptured ACL results in at least equal effectiveness compared with an ACL reconstruction in terms of patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000 subjective scale) 1 year postoperatively. Secondary objectives are to evaluate patient self-reported outcomes (IKDC 2000, KOOS, Tegner, VAS), re-rupture rate, rehabilitation time required for return to daily and sports activities, achieved levels of sports activity, clinimetrics (Rolimeter, LSI, Isoforce) and development of osteoarthritis, at short term (6 weeks, 3, 6 and 9 months and 1 year), midterm (2 and 5 years) and long term (10 years) postoperatively.

DISCUSSION

A renewed interest has emerged in ACL suture repair combined with dynamic augmentation in the treatment of ACL rupture. Recent cohort studies show good short- and midterm results for this technique. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare the outcome of suture repair of a ruptured ACL, combined with DIS as well as microfracture of the femoral notch, with ACL reconstruction using autologous semitendinosus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Register NCT02310854 (retrospectively registered on December 1st, 2014).

Test-retest reliability of repeated knee laxity measurements in the acute phase following a knee trauma using a Rolimeter

The purpose was to examine the test-retest reliability of the Rolimeter measurement procedure in the acute time phase, following a substantial knee trauma. In total, 15 participants with acute knee trauma were examined by one single observer at three different time-points with the Rolimeter using a maximum force. The selected time-points were: baseline (0–7 days after the trauma), midpoint (3–4 weeks after the trauma), and endpoint (3–4 weeks after the trauma). The anterior-posterior displacement was recorded where the endpoint evaluation was used as the reference value. The mean anterior laxity scores remained constant over the measurement time-points for both knees, with an anterior laxity that was 2.7 mm higher (on average) in the injured than the noninjured knee (9.5 mm vs. 6.8 mm). The mean difference (i.e., bias) between laxity scores, for the injured knee, measured at endpoint versus baseline was 0.2±1.0 mm and −0.2±1.1 mm when measured at endpoint versus midpoint, with average typical errors of 0.7 and 0.8 mm and intra-class correlations that were very strong (both r=~0.93). For the same comparisons on the noninjured knee, systematic bias was close to zero (0.1±0.3 and −0.1±0.3 mm, respectively), and both the intra-class correlations were almost perfect (r=~0.99). The current study implicates that repeated Rolimeter measurements are relatively reliable for quantifying anterior knee laxity during the acute time-phases following knee trauma. Hence, the Rolimeter, in combination with manual tests, seems to be a valuable tool for identifying anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

The Influence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnant on Postoperative Clinical Results in Patients with Remnant Preserving Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND:

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) remnants have important biomechanical, vascular and proprioceptive function.

AIM:

To determine the influence of the ACL residual remnants after partial and complete ACL ruptures on postoperative clinical results in patients with remnant preserving ACL reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

The study included 66 patients divided into two groups. In patients from the investigation group remnant preserving ACL reconstruction was performed, in patients from the control group single bundle ACL reconstruction was performed. The results were assessed by Rolimeter measurements, Lysholm and Tegner scores and proprioception evaluation.

RESULTS:

The mean side-to-side difference of anterior tibia displacement (mm) was improved from 4.4 ± 1.06 to 0.4 ± 0.7 in the investigation group, and from 4.6 ± 0.68 to 1.9 ± 0.64 in the control group (p < 0.001). Difference in the angles in which the knee was placed by the device and the patient has improved from 1.5 ± 0.96° to 0.5 ± 0.53° in the investigation group and from 1.8 ± 0.78° to 1.3 ± 0.97° in the control group (p < 0.05). Tegner and Lysholm scores showed no difference between the groups.

CONCLUSION:

Preservation of the ACL residual bundle provides a better knee stability and proprioceptive function.

Application of a Novel Measure of In Vivo Knee Joint Laxity

Current measures of knee joint laxity, such as those found clinically using the KT-2000 arthrometer, are not highly repeatable or reliable by Huber et al. (1997, "Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the KT-1000 Arthrometer in the Assessment of Posterior Laxity of the Knee," Am. J. Sports Med., 25(4), pp. 479-485). In this study, a noninvasive in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-based measure of laxity, the knee loading apparatus (KLA) with anterior positioning frame, was evaluated with five normal subjects (repeatability study, n = 3). Effects of hormones and muscle guarding were considered. When compared to the KT-2000, the KLA was found to be more precise (±0.33 mm versus ±1.17 mm) but less reliable (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70 in 0/8 versus 5/8 load levels). Improved control of the initial subject position is recommended for future design iterations. The KLA shows promise as an accurate and reliable tool for measuring in vivo joint and ligament laxity.

A new technique in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with implant-free tibial fixation

PURPOSE

This case-series outcome study presents a surgical technique for anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with 4-tunnel using two interference screws. There was a 2-year minimum follow-up.

METHODS

From January to December 2009, an ACL 4-tunnel, anatomic, double-bundle reconstruction was performed on 27 patients. Double-strand hamstring tendon grafts were used in each femoral tunnel as well as two interference screws. Tibial fixation was insured through manual tension, by tying non-absorbable sutures on the bone bridge between the two tunnels at 20° of knee flexion. Clinical assessments included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm knee scores, range of motion (ROM), pivot-shift test, single-leg hop, and quadriceps-hamstrings strength tests using a hand-held dynamometer. Anterior knee laxity was also assessed using a rolimeter. A single examiner performed all testing pre-operatively at 6 months and during the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

All patients were assessed during the 2-year follow-up. At that time, 92 % of the patients presented normal anterior laxity (average, 1.3 ± 0.5 mm) and rotational knee stability. No statistical side-to-side difference was found for ROM, muscle strength, single-leg hop, and function (n.s.). All patients presented a normal knee function according to the IKDC and the Lysholm score. In addition, no infection, graft failure, or pain were observed at the harvesting site.

CONCLUSION

The study shows that satisfactory results in relation to knee laxity, function, and strength can be achieved with the implant-free tibial fixation in the ACL double-bundle reconstruction with two interference screws.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging

Arthrometry and stress imaging are useful clinical tools for the objective assessment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) integrity. They are most frequently used for the diagnosis of a complete ACL tear when other workup is equivocal, in conjunction with history and clinical exam findings. Other applications include the diagnosis of partial ACL tears, injury prognosis, and post-operative monitoring. However, further studies are needed to validate these uses. Many different devices and techniques exist for objective examination, which have been compared in recent literature. Reliability and validity measures of these methods vary, and often depend upon examiner familiarity and skill. The KT series of devices is the current gold standard for arthrometry, although the newer robotic GNRB device shows promising early results. Newer methods of data interpretation have been developed for stress imaging, and portable technology may impact this field further.

Objective measurements of static anterior and rotational knee laxity

Several devices allow to measure anterior and rotational static knee laxity. To date, the use of rotational laxity measurements in the daily clinical practice however remains to be improved. These measurements may be systematically integrated to the follow-up of knee injuries. Physiologic laxity measurements may particularly be of interest for the identification of risk factors in athletes. Furthermore, knee laxity measurements help to improve the diagnosis of knee soft tissue injuries and to follow up reconstructions. Further prospective follow-ups of knee laxity in the injured/reconstructed knees are however required to conclude on the best treatment strategy for knee soft tissue injuries.

Posteromedial Meniscocapsular Lesions Increase Tibiofemoral Joint Laxity With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency, and Their Repair Reduces Laxity

BACKGROUND

Injury to the posteromedial meniscocapsular junction has been identified after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture; however, there is a lack of objective evidence investigating how this affects knee kinematics or whether increased laxity can be restored by repair. Such injury is often overlooked at surgery, with possible compromise to results.

HYPOTHESES

(1) Sectioning the posteromedial meniscocapsular junction in an ACL-deficient knee will result in increased anterior tibial translation and rotation. (2) Isolated ACL reconstruction in the presence of a posteromedial meniscocapsular junction lesion will not restore intact knee laxity. (3) Repair of the posteromedial capsule at the time of ACL reconstruction will reduce tibial translation and rotation to normal. (4) These changes will be clinically detectable.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Nine cadaveric knees were mounted in a test rig where knee kinematics were recorded from 0° to 100° of flexion by use of an optical tracking system. Measurements were recorded with the following loads: 90-N anterior-posterior tibial forces, 5-N·m internal-external tibial rotation torques, and combined 90-N anterior force and 5-N·m external rotation torque. Manual Rolimeter readings of anterior translation were taken at 30° and 90°. The knees were tested in the following conditions: intact, ACL deficient, ACL deficient and posteromedial meniscocapsular junction sectioned, ACL deficient and posteromedial meniscocapsular junction repaired, ACL patellar tendon reconstruction with posteromedial meniscocapsular junction repair, and ACL reconstructed and capsular lesion re-created. Statistical analysis used repeated-measures analysis of variance and post hoc paired t tests with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Tibial anterior translation and external rotation were both significantly increased compared with the ACL-deficient knee after posterior meniscocapsular sectioning (P < .05). These parameters were restored after ACL reconstruction and meniscocapsular lesion repair (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Anterior and external rotational laxities were significantly increased after sectioning of the posteromedial meniscocapsular junction in an ACL-deficient knee. These were not restored after ACL reconstruction alone but were restored with ACL reconstruction combined with posterior meniscocapsular repair. Tibial anterior translation changes were clinically detectable by use of the Rolimeter.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests that unrepaired posteromedial meniscocapsular lesions will allow abnormal meniscal and tibiofemoral laxity to persist postoperatively, predisposing the knee to meniscal and articular damage.

ACL Reconstruction Decision Support. Personalized Simulation of the Lachman Test and Custom Activities

INTRODUCTION

This article is part of the Focus Theme of Methods of Information in Medicine on "Methodologies, Models and Algorithms for Patients Rehabilitation".

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the proposed approach is to develop a clinical decision support system (DSS) that will help clinicians optimally plan the ACL reconstruction procedure in a patient specific manner.

METHODS

A full body model is developed in this study with 23 degrees of freedom and 93 muscles. The knee ligaments are modeled as non-linear spring-damper systems and a tibiofemoral contact model was utilized. The parameters of the ligaments were calibrated based on an optimization criterion. Forward dynamics were utilized during simulation for predicting the model's response to a given set of external forces, posture configuration and physiological parameters.

RESULTS

The proposed model is quantified using MRI scans and measurements of the well-known Lachman test, on several patients with a torn ACL. The clinical potential of the proposed framework is demonstrated in the context of flexion-extension, gait and jump actions. The clinician is able to modify and fine tune several parameters such as the number of bundles, insertion position on the tibia or femur and the resting length that correspond to the choices of the surgical procedure and study their effect on the biomechanical behavior of the knee.

CONCLUSION

Computational knee models can be used to predict the effect of surgical decisions and to give insight on how different parameters can affect the stability of the knee. Special focus has to be given in proper calibration and experimental validation.

Diagnostic value of the GNRB ® in relation to pressure load for complete ACL tears: A prospective case-control study of 118 subjects

INTRODUCTION

The GNRB(®) is a reliable, validated arthrometer. A pressure pad exerts 0 to 250 Newtons of pressure on the upper calf. The goal of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of the different pressure loads that are usually applied for the diagnosis of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Our hypothesis was that a load of 200N would be sufficient to diagnose these tears.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective comparative case-control study was performed in 2012. One group included all the male athletes aged 15 to 21 who presented with a complete ACL tear confirmed by arthroscopy (the study group). The control group included male soccer players in a training center aged 15 to 19 with no history of knee injuries (the control group). Anterior laxity was measured in both knees by the same experienced operator using the GNRB(®) system. The main judgment criteria were the diagnostic values of each pressure load evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC), from "Null" (AUC < 0.5) to "Perfect" (AUC = 1).

RESULTS

This study included 118 men: 64 in the study group, mean age 18.1 ± 2.3-years-old, who were mainly soccer players (39/64) or rugby men (16/64) and 54 control subjects, mean age 17.3 ± 1.5-years-old. Three hyperalgesic patients could not receive a pressure load of 250N. The mean differential laxity was significantly higher in the control group, whatever the pressure load (P < 10(-5)). The test was "highly informative" for all loads (0.9 ≤ AUC < 1). Analysis of the AUC revealed a diagnostic value in descending order of: 200N(0.97[0.94-1]) > 134N(0.97[0.93-0.99]) > 250N(0.96[0.93-0.99]) > 89N(0.95[0.90-0.99]).

CONCLUSION

The GNRB(®) at 200N was shown to be sufficient to diagnose complete ACL tears. Applying a pressure load of 250N does not appear to be useful.

Validity of GNRB® arthrometer compared to Telos™ in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears

PURPOSE

The main goal of this study was to compare the results of the GNRB(®) arthrometer to those of Telos™ in the diagnosis of partial thickness tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL).

METHODS

A prospective study performed January-December 2011 included all patients presenting with a partial or full-thickness ACL tears without ACL reconstruction and with a healthy contralateral knee. Anterior laxity was measured in all patients by the Telos™ and GNRB(®) devices. This series included 139 patients, mean age 30.7 ± 9.3 years. Arthroscopic reconstruction was performed in 109 patients, 97 for complete tears and 12 single bundle reconstructions for partial thickness tears. Conservative treatment was proposed in 30 patients with a partial thickness tear. The correlation between the two devices was evaluated by the Spearman coefficient. The optimal laxity thresholds were determined with ROC curves, and the diagnostic value of the tests was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

The differential laxities of full and partial thickness tears were significantly different with the two tests. The correlation between the results of laxity measurement with the two devices was fair, with the strongest correlation between Telos™ 250 N and GNRB(®) 250 N (r = 0.46, p = 0.00001). Evaluation of the AUC showed that the informative value of all tests was fair with the best results with the GNRB(®) 250 N: AUC = 0.89 [95 % CI 0.83-0.94]. The optimal differential laxity threshold with the GNRB(®) 250 N was 2.5 mm (Se = 84 %, Sp = 81 %).

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic value of GNRB(®) was better than Telos™ for ACL partial thickness tears.

Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests

PURPOSE

The aims of this meta-analysis were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 Arthrometer, Stryker Knee Laxity Tester and Genucom Knee Analysis System for ACL rupture. It was hypothesized that the KT 1000 test is the most sensitive and specific. Secondly, it was hypothesized that the sensitivity and specificity of the KT 1000 arthrometer increase when the amount of Newton force is increased.

METHODS

An electronic database search was performed using MEDLINE and EMBASE. All cross-sectional and cohort studies comparing one or more instrumented examination tests for diagnosing acute complete ACL rupture in living human subjects to an accepted reference standard such as arthroscopy, arthrotomy and MRI were included.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of the KT 1000 Arthrometer with 69 N was 0.54. With 89 N, the sensitivity was 0.78 and the specificity 0.92, and with maximum manual force, the sensitivity was 0.93 and the specificity 0.93. For the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester, the sensitivity was 0.82 and the specificity 0.90. And for the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the sensitivity was 0.74 and the specificity 0.82.

CONCLUSION

The KT Arthrometer performed with maximum manual force has the highest sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and positive predictive value for diagnosing ACL rupture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Meta-analysis, level I.

Is triaxial accelerometer reliable in the evaluation and grading of knee pivot-shift phenomenon?

PURPOSE

Dynamic laxity is clinically demonstrated with the pivot-shift (PS) test. Recently, a new system that measures the acceleration of the tibia during the PS test was validated. The goal of the present study was to use the accelerometer "KiRA" to evaluate the efficacy of measuring PS.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2011, a total of 100 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesions were enrolled. They underwent surgical reconstruction of the ACL. Among them, 30 patients were re-evaluated at least 6 months after surgery. Each patient underwent a clinical examination (Lachman test, anterior drawer test, and PS test) and then was subjected to an instrumental examination: KT1000 evaluation to quantify the Lachman test and KiRA to quantify the PS test.

RESULTS

The accelerometer found a positive acceleration difference in favour of the pathologic knee. In the 100 patients evaluated preoperatively, the analysed acceleration parameters on the pathologic knee were found to be significantly different with respect to the contralateral joint. Correlating the clinical subjective data with numerical data, we identified mean reference values for every grade of the PS test (negative, glide, and clunk).

CONCLUSION

Our experience showed us that the use of KiRA accelerometer for quantitative measurement of the PS is both promising and reliable. The efficacy of this instrument is strictly related to an inevitable learning curve and to proper execution of the test. It has the value of being easy to set up and easy to use in both the clinic and the operating room.

Current concept in rotational laxity control and evaluation in ACL reconstruction

Rotation combined with translation; compose the three-dimensional motion of the knee subluxation in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee. The worldwide scientists were focused initially on the translation part of this complex 3D motion, but since the beginning of the century there was a large interest on knee rotational laxity study. Lot of paper reported new devices and results with an explosion since the beginning of the decade. The purpose of this review is to provide an extensive critical analysis of the literature and clarify the knowledge on this topic. We will start with a dismemberment of different rotational laxities reported: the rotation coupled with translation in 2D tests such as Lachman test and anterior drawer test; the rotational envelope considering the maximum internal external rotation; and the "active rotation" occurring in 3D Pivot-shift (PS) test. Then we will analyze the knee kinematics and the role of different anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) bundle on rotation. A review of different mechanical and radiological devices used to assess the different rotations on ACL deficient knees will be presented. Two groups will be analyzed, dynamic and static conditions of tests. Navigation will be described precisely; it was the starter of this recent interest in rotation studies. Opto electronic and electromagnetic navigation systems will be presented and analyzed. We will conclude with the last generation of rotational laxity assessment devices, using accelerometers, which are very promising.

Innovative technology for knee laxity evaluation: clinical applicability and reliability of inertial sensors for quantitative analysis of the pivot-shift test

There has been an increased interest in the quantification of the knee laxity secondary to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. In clinical practice, the diagnosis is performed by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging analysis and confirmed arthroscopically. The pivot shift phenomenon has been identified as one of the essential signs of functional ACL insufficiency. A reliable system to adequately assess patients with ACL injury, quantifying the pivot shift test outcome, is needed. Several studies have been conducted in this regard but the proposed methods remain confined to a research area. The goal of this article is to summarize the actual knowledge and current concepts.

Static rotational and sagittal knee laxity measurements after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

PURPOSE

The goal of the present study was to evaluate static anteroposterior and rotational knee laxity after ACL reconstructions with two noninvasive measurement devices by comparing the measured results of the operated with the contralateral healthy knees of the patients.

METHODS

Fifty-two consecutive patients were reviewed after isolated single-bundle transtibial ACL reconstruction using a BPTB graft. At a mean follow-up of 27 months, sagittal AP laxity was tested using a noninvasive knee measurement system (Genourob) with an applied pressure of 67 N, 89 N and 134 N. Rotational laxity was measured using a noninvasive rotational knee laxity device (Rotameter) with an applied torque of 5, 8 and 10 Nm. The results were compared with the measurements of the patients' healthy contralateral knees. Tegner, Lysholm and IKDC score were used in order to evaluate the clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Pivot shift was negative (33) or glide (16) in 49 patients with 12 of 16 (75%) patients having also a pivot glide on the healthy contralateral side; Lachman tests were negative in 50 cases. Subjective assessment of the IKDC score was classified according to category A in 44 patients, B in 5 patients and C in 3 patients. Mean Lysholm score was 94.5 ± 9.5, median Tegner score was 7 (3-9) preoperative and 6 (3-9) at follow-up (n.s.). Anteroposterior knee laxity measurements revealed mean side-to-side differences of 0.6-1.3 mm (P < 0.0001). Rotational laxity measurements revealed no statistical significant differences between the operated and the contralateral knee (n.s.). The measured differences in the entire rotational range varied from 0.2° to 1° depending on the applied torque. In those 3 patients with a positive pivot shift, differences in the entire rotational range of 4.5° at 5 N, 4.6° at 8 N and 4.1° at 10 N were found.

CONCLUSION

Static knee laxity was quantified after ACL surgery using the introduced noninvasive measurement systems by comparing the measured results of the operated with the contralateral healthy knees. Significant differences were found in AP laxity although they were defined as clinically successful according to the IKDC classification. No significant differences were found in rotational knee laxity measurements. Therefore, the used noninvasive masurement devices might offer a high potential for objective quality control in knee ligament injuries and their treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Retrospective case series, Level IV.

Quantitative assessment of pivot-shift using inertial sensors

PURPOSE

The pivot-shift phenomenon has been identified to be one of the essential signs of functional anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency. However, the pivot-shift test remains a surgeon-subjective examination, lacking a general recognized quantitative measurement. The goal of the present study was to validate the use of an inertial sensor for quantifying the pivot-shift test, using a commercial navigation system.

METHODS

An expert surgeon intra-operatively performed the pivot-shift test on 15 consecutive patients before ACL reconstruction. A single accelerometer and a commercial navigation system simultaneously acquired limb kinematics. An additional optical tracker mounted on the accelerometer allowed following sensor movements. Anteroposterior (a-p) tibial acceleration obtained with the navigation system was compared with three-dimensional (3D) acceleration acquired by the accelerometer. The effect of skin artifacts and test-retest positioning were estimated. Repeatability of the acceleration parameter and waveform was analyzed. Correlation between the two measurements was also assessed.

RESULTS

Average root mean square (RMS) error in test-retest positioning reported a good value of 5.5 ± 2.9 mm. Mean RMS displacement due to soft tissue artifacts was 4.9 ± 2.6 mm. The analysis of acceleration range repetitions reported a good intra-tester repeatability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86). Inter-patients similarity analysis showed a mean acceleration waveform correlation of 0.88 ± 0.14. The acceleration ranges demonstrated a good positive correlation between the two measurements (rs = 0.72, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed good reliability of the new device and good correlation with the navigation system results. Therefore, the accelerometer is a valid method to assess dynamic joint laxity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Functional and muscle morphometric effects of ACL reconstruction. A prospective CT study with 1 year follow-up

Computed tomography (CT) was used to explore if changes in muscle cross-sectional area and quality after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction would be related to knee function. Fourteen females and 23 males (16-54 years) underwent clinical tests, subjective questionnaires, and CT 1 week before and 1 year after ACL surgery with semitendinosus-gracilis (STG) graft and rehabilitation. Postoperatively, knee laxity was decreased and functional knee measures and subjective patient scores improved. The most obvious remaining deficit was the quadriceps atrophy, which was significantly larger if the right leg was injured. Right-leg injury also tended to cause larger compensatory hypertrophy of the combined knee flexor and tibial internal rotator muscles (preoperatively). The quadriceps atrophy was significantly correlated with the scores and functional tests, the latter also being related to the remaining size of the gracilis muscle. Biceps femoris hypertrophy and, in males only, semimembranosus hypertrophy was observed following the ACL reconstruction. The lack of semimembranosus hypertrophy in the women could, via tibial internal rotation torque deficit, contribute to the less favorable functional and subjective outcome recorded for the women. The results indicate that the quadriceps, the combined knee flexor/tibial internal rotator muscles, side of ACL injury, and sex are important to consider in rehabilitation after STG graft.

An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot-shift test

Even if pivot-shift (PS) test has been clinically used to specifically detect anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, the main problem in using this combined test has been yet associated with the difficulty of clearly quantifying its outcome. The goal of this study was to describe an original non-invasive methodology used to quantify PS test, highlighting its possible clinical reliability. The method was validated on 66 consecutive unilateral ACL-injured patients. A commercial triaxial accelerometer was non-invasively mounted on patient's tibia, the corresponding 3D acceleration was acquired during PS test execution and a set of specific parameters were automatically identified on the signal to quantify the test. PS test was repeated three times on both injured and controlateral limbs. Reliability of the method was found to be good (mean intra-rater intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.79); moreover, we found that ACL-deficient knees presented statistically higher values for the identified parameters--than the controlateral healthy limbs, averagely reporting also large effect size.

The combination of radiostereometric analysis and the telos stress device results in poor precision for knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Several devices for measuring knee laxity following anterior cruciate ligament ACL reconstruction exist, but the precision of the methods has never been optimal. Therefore, a new standardized protocol (NSP) was made, aiming at ensuring a reliable positioning of the Telos Stress Device (TSD) which theoretically could result in precise knee laxity measurements when using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) in combination with TSD.

METHOD

The TSD was applied to the knee of 30 healthy persons, using both the NSP and the official company instructions. The position of the stress arms of the TSD was marked following each measurement. The reliability of each protocol was calculated as the difference in length between the first and second markings. The NSP for the TSD was then used in a clinical study. Thirty-five patients underwent ACL reconstruction. Double measurements of knee laxity by RSA were performed at a 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Using the NSP for TSD positioning, the prediction interval at the marking sites ranged from ±0.4 to ±1.1 mm. Following the company instructions, the prediction interval ranged from ±0.8 to ±3.9 mm depending on marking site. Thus, the precision of positioning the stress arms of the TSD was improved at all marking sites using the NSP compared with the original company protocol. The double measurements of the knee laxity in the clinical study resulted in a mean difference of 0.0 mm and a prediction interval of ±5.2 mm.

CONCLUSION

Even though the NSP improved the positioning of the TSD on patients' extremities, the combination of NSP-TSD and RSA was not able to provide acceptable knee laxity measurements in a clinical setting compared with published precision data for other devices on the market. Therefore, the Telos Stress Device is not recommendable for use in knee laxity measurements following ACL reconstruction.

Evaluation of arthrometer for ankle instability: a cadaveric study

BACKGROUND

Stress tests are used to diagnose both acute and chronic lateral ankle instability. Commonly used stress tests require radiography and their reliability and sensitivity is still under debate. We developed a non radiographic ankle arthrometer to objectively assess mechanical ankle stability. This device was validated against stress radiographs in a cadaver investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine cadaver specimens were tested under: 0, 15, and 30 degrees ankle plantarflexion and 50 N, 100 N, 150 N, and 200 N anterior drawer load application. First, intact specimens were tested. Then the anterior talofibular ligament, calcaneofibular ligament and posterior talofibular ligament were sequentially cut. Anterior drawer displacement was analyzed simultaneously by a displacement transducer and by radiographic measurement. Stiffness was calculated as the linear increment of the load deformation curve. Results of a commercially available stress testing device served as a standard.

RESULTS

Stable and unstable ankles were differentiated by ankle arthrometer displacement and stiffness analyses (p = 0.012 and 0.003) with the arthrometer adjusted to 0 degrees of plantarflexion and 50 N anterior drawer load application. Standardized stress testing device and ankle arthrometer stress radiographic measurements correlated significantly (p = 0.000 to 0.027). Transducer measured anterior drawer instability was highly sensitive (96.3%), while specificity was 44.4%. Setting a cut off value of 4.5 N/mm, the stiffness analyses discriminated stable and unstable ankles with a sensitivity of 91.7% while the specificity was 62.5%.

CONCLUSION

The ankle arthrometer was able to measure anterior subluxation of the talus in relation to the tibia in a cadaver experiment. The procedure is non-radiographic and highly sensitive in differentiating unstable from stable ankles.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Availablity of a nonradiographic device to measure ankle instability could improve diagnostic accuracy and facilitate decision making in patients with chronic ankle instability.

Adaptations of gait and muscle activation in chronic ACL deficiency

The purpose was to investigate whether deviations in gait parameters or muscular activity patterns can be detected in the injured and healthy leg of chronic ACL-deficient subjects. Sixteen medium-level active chronic ACL-deficient patients classified as "copers" (injury duration: 12-240 months, age 17-52 years) and 15 healthy subjects (age 20-33 years) walked at self-selected speed along a 10-m runway with a level force-plate. Gait specific data, ground reaction forces, knee and ankle angles, and EMG were documented. Knee laxity was increased and the functional scores (Lysholm, KOOS) decreased in the ACL- deficient subjects, whereas the Tegner activity level score was normal. Gait speed, stride length and stance time did not differ between ACL-deficient subjects and controls. Ground reaction forces (magnitude and times), as well as knee and ankle angles at selected points during stance and swing phases were normal in the ACL-deficient subjects compared to controls. The total duration of m. tibialis anterior (TA) activity was longer in ACL-deficient subjects than in controls (ACL-deficient injured leg vs. controls, P < 0.05). In addition, the onset of lateral gastrocnemius (LG) muscle activity occurred earlier in ACL-deficient patients (P < 0.03), resulting in a TA-LG cocontraction in the ACL-deficient but not in the control group. In conclusion, chronic, medium-level active ACL-deficient patients showed abnormalities in muscular activity patterns during gait compared to control subjects, whereas there were no detectable changes in ground reaction forces and 3D kinematic data. As the aberrant muscular activity pattern may be of importance for an even gait, it is proposed that EMG recordings may give additional information in the evaluation and rehabilitation of gait when the ACL is absent.

Current concepts in instrumented knee-laxity testing

BACKGROUND

Instrumented knee laxity testing devices have been used in both the clinical and research setting to evaluate persons with injuries about the knee. The ability to accurately and reproducibly quantify knee motion has the potential to greatly benefit both clinical practice and research by improving the validity of the research involving treatment of knee-ligament injuries.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A thorough literature review was performed, and a systematic overview is provided evaluating the methods of use and the evidence for the use of instrumented knee laxity testing devices.

RESULTS

Devices that provide measurements of knee laxity have evolved during the past 30 years. The authors describe in detail their proper use and the best estimates of their validity based on clinical studies.

CONCLUSION

The review suggests that the KT-1000 knee arthrometer and the Rolimeter provide best results when testing anterior laxity at the knee, whereas the Telos device is superior for the assessment of posterior laxity.

No difference in clinical results between femoral transfixation and bio-interference screw fixation in hamstring tendon ACL reconstruction. A preliminary study

Hamstring tendon autograft has become a popular graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, but there is no consensus on the ideal technique of fixation. We performed a pilot randomized controlled study to compare the clinical and mechanical outcome of two femoral fixation techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstrings graft. We recruited 30 patients with a chronic unilateral tear of the anterior cruciate ligament. In all patients, quadrupled hamstring graft was used for ACL reconstruction. In 15 patients, femoral graft fixation was performed using Bio-interference Screws fixation (Arthrex, Inc. Naples USA) (Group 1). In the other 15 patients, femoral graft fixation was performed using BioTransFix femur extra cortical transverse fixation (Arthrex, Inc. Naples USA) (Group 2). In both groups, tibial fixation was achieved with a Delta bio-absorbable interference screw (Arthrex). Both groups were comparable with regard to demographic data, pre-operative activity level, mechanism of injury, interval between the injury and the operation, and pre-operative knee laxity measurements. An independent observer, who was blinded with regard to the involved leg and the type of graft, performed the outcome assessment with the use of a Rolimeter arthrometer (Aircast), and the International Knee Documentation Committee. At 13 months follow up, all patients except one had functionally normal or nearly normal IKDC objective scores. The mean IKDC subjective score was 83.38+/-9.4 in Group 1 and 79.92+/-11.01 in Group 2 (P>.05). The side to side laxity as measured with the Rolimeter arthrometer was 1.5 mm+/-1 (range 0-3) for Group 1, and 2 mm+/-1 (range 0-3) for Group 2 (P>.05). Femoral Biotransfix fixation and Bio-interference Screws fixation provide comparable mechanical stability and clinical outcome at 13 months follow up. BiotransFix fixation is an effective alternative to other devices. Our preliminary study shows that there is no evidence to prefer femoral transfixation to the more traditional, technically less demanding, and more economical interference screw fixation. A full study requires 368 participants.

KIN-Nav navigation system for kinematic assessment in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: features, use, and perspectives

In this paper a new navigation system, KIN-Nav, developed for research and used during 80 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions is described. KIN-Nav is a user-friendly navigation system for flexible intraoperative acquisitions of anatomical and kinematic data, suitable for validation of biomechanical hypotheses. It performs real-time quantitative evaluation of antero-posterior, internal-external, and varus-valgus knee laxity at any degree of flexion and provides a new interface for this task, suitable also for comparison of pre-operative and post-operative knee laxity and surgical documentation. In this paper the concept and features of KIN-Nav, which represents a new approach to navigation and allows the investigation of new quantitative measurements in ACL reconstruction, are described. Two clinical studies are reported, as examples of clinical potentiality and correct use of this methodology. In this paper a preliminary analysis of KIN-Nav's reliability and clinical efficacy, performed during blinded repeated measures by three independent examiners, is also given. This analysis is the first assessment of the potential of navigation systems for evaluating knee kinematics.

The anterior-posterior laxity after total knee arthroplasty inserted with a ligament tensor

Goal of this study is to determine the anterior-posterior laxity in 30 degrees of knee flexion for a posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty with a relative dished insert and implanted with a ligament tensor. Furthermore, the correlation between these AP laxities and the postoperative range of motion (ROM) and postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS) is analysed. Fifty-one balanSys total knee arthroplasties were performed in 49 patients between 1998 and 2000. These arthroplasties are analysed with respect to AP laxity (Rolimeter), ROM and KSS with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years. The mean anterior laxity is 2.8 mm with no posterior laxities at all. The average postoperative ROM is 110 degrees with an average KSS of 142. No correlations between AP-laxity and postoperative ROM or between AP-laxity and postoperative KSS are found. A posterior cruciate retaining TKA with a relative dished insert and implanted with a tensor is very stable in the anterior-posterior direction in 30 degrees of knee flexion. This limited laxity does not seem to disadvantage the mean postoperative ROM and KSS, when compared to other TKA studies.

Measuring knee joint laxity: a review of applicable models and the need for new approaches to minimize variability

Knee joint laxity can result from soft tissue injury, such as a ligament tear, or from genetic factors such as joint hypermobility syndrome and various forms of Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome. The location of a subject's passive knee laxity along a continuous spectrum is dependent on the mechanical properties of the existing structures, and the increased motion that often follows joint injury. At a threshold along the spectrum, a patient will be at risk for joint instability and further injury to joint structures. Links between instability and laxity may be better understood if laxity can be reliably and accurately quantified. Current measures of laxity have not been compared to a 'gold standard' in all cases, and when they have, were found to overestimate the laxity values. This is attributed to soft tissue deformation. Consequently, a noninvasive measure of laxity with improved accuracy and repeatability would be useful clinically and in the research sector. In this review, current clinical measures of laxity are critiqued, criteria for a measure of laxity are identified, and three theoretical models of knee laxity are outlined. These include contact, lumped parameter, and finite element models, with emphasis on applicability, strengths, and limitations of each. The long term goal is to develop a model and method able to differentiate subjects along a spectrum of laxity, and understand the functional implications of altered joint integrity. This would allow careful scrutiny of clinical interventions aimed at improving joint health and provide a valuable research tool to study joint injury, healing, and degeneration.

An investigation to examine the inter-tester and intra-tester reliability of the Rolimeter knee tester, and its sensitivity in identifying knee joint laxity

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Rolimeter knee tester (Aircast, Europe) as reliable and clinically sensitive tool for identifying and quantifying knee joint laxity utilising a sample of both known ACLD and normal knees.

METHODS

Thirty matched subjects (15 known ACLD and 15 normal subjects) were tested for knee joint laxity using the Rolimeter. Each subject was measured at both 90 degrees and 30 degrees of knee flexion, by each of the six investigators. This was then repeated again by all six investigators so that inter-tester and intra-tester reliability could be examined.

RESULTS

Results showed that there was good reliability between testers, and intra-tester reliability was good for both left and right knees in both 90 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion. Results also demonstrated a high level of sensitivity for determining knee joint laxity in ACLD compared to normal knees.

CONCLUSION

The Rolimeter knee tester is a reliable device for quantifying knee joint laxity, and is sensitive enough to identify anterior cruciate ligament deficiency.

The interrater variation of ED abdominal examination findings in patients with acute abdominal pain

OBJECTIVE

The physical examination of the abdomen is crucial to emergency department (ED) management of patients with abdominal pain. We sought to determine the interrater variation between attending and resident physicians in detecting abdominal exam findings.

METHODS

Research enrollers surveyed attending and resident physicians on abdominal exam findings in the ED in patients with abdominal pain. Strength of agreement was calculated using the kappa statistic.

RESULTS

A convenience sample of 122 surveys was completed. Calculated kappa results are in parentheses. There was almost perfect agreement on the presence of masses and substantial agreement on the need for imaging studies. There was moderate agreement on guarding, distension, tenderness, and need for laboratory tests and surgical consultation. For 88 (72%) patients with tenderness, substantial agreement was calculated for epigastric tenderness, moderate agreement on right upper quadrant, supraumbilical, suprapubic, left lower quadrant, right lower quadrant tenderness, and fair agreement on left upper quadrant tenderness. Sixty-one (50%) patients received pain medicine in the ED. Among those, there was fair agreement on a presence of a surgical abdomen. Upper level resident physicians noted a higher level of agreement with the attending physician for tenderness than junior resident physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

There was moderate agreement between resident and attending physicians for most of the findings in patients with abdominal pain. Recognition that selected findings are more variable than others should encourage careful confirmation of resident physicians' assessments in teaching settings.

Inter-rater reliability of Rolimeter measurements between anterior cruciate ligament injured and normal contra lateral knees

The Rolimeter device can provide measurements of anterior/posterior tibial displacement using maximal manual force. The Rolimeter reliability is still under research when used as an independent knee tester. The purpose of this study is to determine the inter-rater reliability of the Rolimeter measurements between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injured and normal contra lateral knees. Twelve male patients with ACL deficiency participated in this study. Three physical therapists (PT) performed the Rolimeter measurements in supine position with an approximate 25 degrees flexion of the knees. Each therapist performed three trials on each knee and the difference in results in millimeters between injured knee and normal contra lateral knee was determined. Spearman's rho correlations showed weak relationships between the PT 1, 3 and 2, 3 (PT 1 vs. PT 3 r=0.55, PT 2 vs. PT 3 r=0.57) and the high relation between 1, 2 (PT 1 vs. PT 2 r=0.96) of Rolimeter measurements. Intraclass correlation coefficient showed no significant reliability coefficients among the three PT Rolimeter measurements between ACL injured and normal contra lateral knees (R=0.24, p=0.05). These results reflect the variations among the means of the three physical therapists' Rolimeter measurements between ACL injured and normal contra lateral knees.