Bacteriological analysis of meshes removed for complications after surgical management of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse

Diagnosis and management of complications following pelvic organ prolapse surgery using a synthetic mesh: French national guidelines for clinical practice

Complications associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery using a synthetic non-absorbable mesh are uncommon (<5%) but may be severe and may hugely diminish the quality of life of some women. In drawing up these multidisciplinary clinical practice recommendations, the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de santé, HAS) conducted an exhaustive review of the literature concerning the diagnosis, prevention, and management of complications associated with POP surgery using a synthetic mesh. Each recommendation for practice was allocated a grade (A,B or C; or expert opinion (EO)), which depends on the level of evidence (clinical practice guidelines).

PREOPERATIVE PATIENTS' INFORMATION

Each patient must be informed concerning the risks associated with POP surgery (EO).

HEMORRHAGE, HEMATOMA

Vaginal infiltration using a vasoconstrictive solution is not recommended during POP surgery by the vaginal route (grade C). The placement of vaginal packing is not recommended following POP surgery by the vaginal route (grade C). During laparoscopic sacral colpopexy, when the promontory seems highly dangerous or when severe adhesions prevent access to the anterior vertebral ligament, alternative surgical techniques should be discussed per operatively, including colpopexy by lateral mesh laparoscopic suspension, uterosacral ligament suspension, open abdominal mesh surgery, or surgery by the vaginal route (EO).

BLADDER INJURY

When a bladder injury is diagnosed, bladder repair by suturing is recommended, using a slow resorption suture thread, plus monitoring of the permeability of the ureters (before and after bladder repair) when the injury is located at the level of the trigone (EO). When a bladder injury is diagnosed, after bladder repair, a prosthetic mesh (polypropylene or polyester material) can be placed between the repaired bladder and the vagina, if the quality of the suturing is good. The recommended duration of bladder catheterization following bladder repair in this context of POP mesh surgery is from 5 to 10 days (EO).

URETER INJURY

After ureteral repair, it is possible to continue sacral colpopexy and place the mesh if it is located away from the ureteral repair (EO).

RECTAL INJURY

Regardless of the approach, when a rectal injury occurs, a posterior mesh should not be placed between the rectum and the vagina wall (EO). Concerning the anterior mesh, it is recommended to use a macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh (EO). A polyester mesh is not recommended in this situation (EO).

VAGINAL WALL INJURY

After vaginal wall repair, an anterior or a posterior microporous polypropylene mesh can be placed, if the quality of the repair is found to be satisfactory (EO). A polyester mesh should not be used after vaginal wall repair (EO).

MESH INFECTION (ABSCESS, CELLULITIS, SPONDYLODISCITIS)

Regardless of the surgical approach, intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended (aminopenicillin + beta-lactamase inhibitor: 30 min before skin incision +/- repeated after 2 h if surgery lasts longer) (EO). When spondylodiscitis is diagnosed following sacral colpopexy, treatment should be discussed by a multidisciplinary group, including especially spine specialists (rheumatologists, orthopedists, neurosurgeons) and infectious disease specialists (EO). When a pelvic abscess occurs following synthetic mesh sacral colpopexy, it is recommended to carry out complete mesh removal as soon as possible, combined with collection of intraoperative bacteriological samples, drainage of the collection and targeted antibiotic therapy (EO). Non-surgical conservative management with antibiotic therapy may be an option (EO) in certain conditions (absence of signs of sepsis, macroporous monofilament polypropylene type 1 mesh, prior microbiological documentation and multidisciplinary consultation for the choice of type and duration of antibiotic therapy), associated with close monitoring of the patient.

BOWEL OCCLUSION RELATED TO NON-CLOSURE OF THE PERITONEUM

Peritoneal closure is recommended after placement of a synthetic mesh by the abdominal approach (EO).

URINARY RETENTION

Preoperative urodynamics is recommended in women presenting with urinary symptoms (bladder outlet obstruction symptoms, overactive bladder syndrome or incontinence) (EO). It is recommended to remove the bladder catheter at the end of the procedure or within 48 h after POP surgery (grade B). Bladder emptying and post-void residual should be checked following POP surgery, before discharge (EO). When postoperative urine retention occurs after POP surgery, it is recommended to carry out indwelling catheterization and to prefer intermittent self-catheterization (EO).

POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

Before POP surgery, the patient should be asked about risk factors for prolonged and chronic postoperative pain (pain sensitization, allodynia, chronic pelvic or non-pelvic pain) (EO). Concerning the prevention of postoperative pain, it is recommended to carry out a pre-, per- and postoperative multimodal pain treatment (grade B). The use of ketamine intraoperatively is recommended for the prevention of chronic postoperative pelvic pain, especially for patients with risk factors (preoperative painful sensitization, allodynia, chronic pelvic or non-pelvic pain) (EO). Postoperative prescription of opioids should be limited in quantity and duration (grade C). When acute neuropathic pain (sciatalgia or pudendal neuralgia) resistant to level I and II analgesics occurs following sacrospinous fixation, a reintervention is recommended for suspension suture removal (EO). When chronic postoperative pain occurs after POP surgery, it is recommended to systematically seek arguments in favor of neuropathic pain with the DN4 questionnaire (EO). When chronic postoperative pelvic pain occurs after POP surgery, central sensitization should be identified since it requires a consultation in a chronic pain department (EO). Concerning myofascial pain syndrome (clinical pain condition associated with increased muscle tension caused by myofascial trigger points), when chronic postoperative pain occurs after POP surgery, it is recommended to examine the levator ani, piriformis and obturator internus muscles, so as to identify trigger points on the pathway of the synthetic mesh (EO). Pelvic floor muscle training with muscle relaxation is recommended when myofascial pain syndrome is associated with chronic postoperative pain following POP surgery (EO). After failure of pelvic floor muscle training (3 months), it is recommended to discuss surgical removal of the synthetic mesh, during a multidisciplinary discussion group meeting (EO). Partial removal of synthetic mesh is indicated when a trigger point is located on the pathway of the mesh (EO). Total removal of synthetic mesh should be discussed during a multidisciplinary discussion group meeting when diffuse (no trigger point) chronic postoperative pain occurs following POP surgery, with or without central sensitization or neuropathic pain syndromes (EO).

POSTOPERATIVE DYSPAREUNIA

When de novo postoperative dyspareunia occurs after POP surgery, surgical removal of the mesh should be discussed (EO).

VAGINAL MESH EXPOSURE

To reduce the risk of vaginal mesh exposure, when hysterectomy is required during sacral colpopexy, subtotal hysterectomy is recommended (grade C). When asymptomatic vaginal macroporous monofilament polypropylene mesh exposure occurs, systematic imaging is not recommended. When vaginal polyester mesh exposure occurs, pelvic +/- lumbar MRI (EO) should be used to look for an abscess or spondylodiscitis, given the greater risk of infection associated with this type of material. When asymptomatic vaginal mesh exposure of less than 1 cm2 occurs in a woman with no sexual intercourse, the patient should be offered observation (no treatment) or local estrogen therapy (EO). However, if the patient wishes, partial excision of the mesh can be offered. When asymptomatic vaginal mesh exposure of more than 1 cm2 occurs or if the woman has sexual intercourse, or if it is a polyester prosthesis, partial mesh excision, either immediately or after local estrogen therapy, should be offered (EO). When symptomatic vaginal mesh exposure occurs, but without infectious complications, surgical removal of the exposed part of the mesh by the vaginal route is recommended (EO), and not systematic complete excision of the mesh. Following sacral colpopexy, complete removal of the mesh (by laparoscopy or laparotomy) is only required in the presence of an abscess or spondylodiscitis (EO). When vaginal mesh exposure recurs after a first reoperation, the patient should be treated by an experienced team specialized in this type of complication (EO).

SUTURE THREAD VAGINAL EXPOSURE

For women presenting with vaginal exposure to non-absorbable suture thread following POP surgery with mesh reinforcement, the suture thread should be removed by the vaginal route (EO). Removal of the surrounding mesh is only recommended when vaginal mesh exposure or associated abscess is diagnosed.

BLADDER AND URETERAL MESH EXPOSURE

When bladder mesh exposure occurs, removal of the exposed part of the mesh is recommended (grade B). Both alternatives (total or partial mesh removal) should be discussed with the patient and should be debated during a multidisciplinary discussion group meeting (EO).

Biosynthetic Mesh Reconstruction after Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Cross Relation of Surgical Healing and Oncological Outcomes: A Multicentric Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Local wound complications are among the most relevant sequelae after an abdominoperineal resection (APR) for low rectal cancer. One of the proposed techniques to improve the postoperative recovery and to accelerate the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is the mesh reinforcement of the perineal wound. The aim of the current study is to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes after APR performed with a biosynthetic mesh reconstruction versus the conventional procedure.

METHODS

From 2015 to 2020, in two tertiary centres, the surgical outcomes, the wound events (i.e., surgical site infections, wound dehiscence and the complete healing time) and the oncological outcomes (i.e., time length to start adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy, an over 8-week delay in chemotherapy and the recurrence rate) were retrospectively analysed in patients undergoing APR reinforced with biosynthetic mesh (Group A) and conventional APR (Group B). Results Sixty-one patients were treated with APR (25 in Group A and 36 in Group B). Patients in Group A presented lower time for: healing (16 versus 24 days, p = 0.015), inferior perineal wound dehiscence rates (one versus nine cases, p = 0.033), an earlier adjuvant therapy start (26 versus 70 days, p = 0.003) and a lower recurrence rate (16.6% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.152).

CONCLUSIONS

In our series, the use of a biosynthetic mesh for the neo-perineum reconstruction after a Miles' procedure has resulted in safe, reproducible results affected by limited complications, guarantying a rapid start of the adjuvant therapy with clear benefits in oncological outcomes. Further randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed to validate these results.

Transvaginal Mesh-related Complications and the Potential Role of Bacterial Colonization: An Exploratory Observational Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the potential role of transvaginal mesh bacterial colonization in the development of mesh-related complications (MRCs).

DESIGN

An observational and exploratory study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center (Amsterdam UMC, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). PATIëNTS: 49 patients indicated for mesh removal and 20 women of whom vaginal tissue was retrieved during prolapse surgery as a reference cohort.

INTERVENTIONS

collection of mesh-tissue complex (patient cohort) or vaginal tissue (reference cohort) MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Homogenized samples were used for quantitative microbiological culture. Inflammation and fibrosis were semiquantitatively histologically scored; Gram staining and fluorescence in situ hybridization were used to detect bacteria and bacterial biofilms. Of the 49 patients, 44 samples (90%) were culture positive, with a higher diversity of species and more Gram-negative bacteria and polymicrobial cultures in the MRC cohort than the reference cohort, with mostly staphylococci, streptococci, Actinomyces spp., Cutibacterium acnes, and Escherichia coli. Patients with clinical signs of infection or exposure had the highest bacterial counts. Histology demonstrated moderate to severe inflammation in most samples. Gram staining showed bacteria in 57% of culture-positive samples, and in selected samples, fluorescence in situ hybridization illustrated a polymicrobial biofilm.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we observed distinct differences in bacterial numbers and species between patients with MRCs and a reference cohort. Bacteria were observed at the mesh-tissue interface in a biofilm. These results strongly support the potential role of bacterial mesh colonization in the development of MRCs.

Melt-extrusion 3D printing of resorbable levofloxacin-loaded meshes: Emerging strategy for urogynaecological applications

Current surgical strategies for the treatment of pelvic floor dysfunctions involve the placement of a polypropylene mesh into the pelvic cavity. However, polypropylene meshes have proven to have inadequate mechanical properties and have been associated to the arising of severe complications, such as infections. Furthermore, currently employed manufacturing strategies are unable to produce compliant and customisable devices. In this work, polycaprolactone has been used to produce resorbable levofloxacin-loaded meshes in two different designs (90° and 45°) via melt-extrusion 3D printing. Drug-loaded meshes were produced using a levofloxacin concentration of 0.5% w/w. Drug loaded meshes were successfully produced with highly reproducible mechanical and physico-chemical properties. Tensile test results showed that drug-loaded 45° meshes possessed a mechanical behaviour close to that of the vaginal tissue (E ≃ 8.32 ± 1.85 MPa), even after 4 weeks of accelerated degradation. Meshes released 80% of the loaded levofloxacin in the first 3 days and were capable of producing an inhibitory effect against S. Aureus and E. coli bacterial strains with an inhibition zone equal to 12.8 ± 0.45 mm and 15.8 ± 0.45 mm respectively. Thus, the strategy adopted in this work holds great promise for the manufacturing of custom-made surgical meshes with antibacterial properties.

Shifts in Vaginal Bacterial Community Composition Are Associated With Vaginal Mesh Exposure

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between vaginal mesh exposure and vaginal bacterial community composition.

METHODS

Vaginal swab samples were collected from 13 women undergoing excision of vaginal mesh with vaginal mesh exposure. Samples were collected at the midvagina, site of exposure, and underneath the vaginal epithelium at the exposure. Control samples were collected vaginally during 15 new patient examinations. For all samples, we extracted genomic DNA and polymerase chain reaction amplified and sequenced the 16S rRNA gene V4 region. We tested for differences in the microbiota among control and exposure samples with PERMANOVA tests of beta diversity measures (Morisita-Horn dissimilarity) and Wilcoxon rank sum tests of Lactobacillus distribution.

RESULTS

Vaginal bacterial communities in both control and case groups were divided into 2 primary community types, one characterized by Lactobacillus dominance (>50% of community) and the other by low Lactobacillus and a high diversity of vaginal anaerobes. In 10 of 13 case women, bacterial communities were highly similar between the 3 vaginal sites (adonis R2 = 0.86, P = 0.0099). In the 3 women with community divergence, all 3 were characterized by decreased Lactobacillus abundance at the exposure site. Overall, Lactobacillus abundance was lower at the site of mesh exposure and under the epithelium than in the experimental control (W = 137, P = 0.072, r = 0.41; W = 146, P = 0.025, r = 0.50). Common putative pathogenic mesh colonizing bacteria were common (in 51 of 54 samples), but generally not abundant (median relative abundance = 0.014%).

CONCLUSIONS

In vaginal mesh exposure cases, a woman is more likely to have a diverse, non-Lactobacillus-dominant community.

Actinomyces in explanted transvaginal mesh: commensal or pathogen?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

There is a paucity of information in the literature regarding the clinical impact and treatment of histologically positive actinomycosis explanted vaginal mesh. We aimed to report the prevalence and independent predicators of Actinomyces presence in explanted meshes on histology and to compare the clinical course in those with and without Actinomyces. Our hypothesis is that Actinomyces may act as a commensal rather than a pathogen when identified in extracted transvaginal meshes.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of explanted vaginal mesh removed between 2013 and 2018 was undertaken and compared Actinomyces-positive and -negative cohorts on histology. Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated possible risk factors for positive Actinomyces including patient demographics, smoking, diabetes, hormone replacement therapy (vaginal/systemic), hysterectomy in primary surgery, rate and indication for prior mesh removal. The rate of symptom resolution or need for subsequent mesh excisions is compared between the two cohorts.

RESULTS

Actinomycosis was identified in 11% (31/278) of explanted mesh. After multivariant analysis, only voiding dysfunction as an indication for mesh removal was statistically significantly associated with Actinomyces-negative histology (14 vs 0%, p < 0.001). At median review of 17 months, symptom resolution (87% vs 83% p = 0.68) and need for subsequent mesh removal (13% vs 19%, p = 0.37) following index mesh excision were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Actinomyces in explanted transvaginal mesh frequently acts as a commensal in those who are infection free. In this cohort, individualized care including conservative surveillance without antibiotics or full explantation is reasonable.

In Vitro Bacterial Adhesion and Biofilm Formation on Fully Absorbable Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate and Nonabsorbable Polypropylene Pelvic Floor Implants

Knitted polypropylene (PP) implants for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse have been associated with complications such as vaginal exposure, infection, and pain. Since certain complications may be linked to bacterial contamination and persistent inflammation, there is a rationale to develop a biocompatible implant that is less prone to bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Delayed absorbable materials could meet these requirements and poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) might be such a new material for future pelvic floor implants. We studied in vitro bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on P4HB in comparison to PP. We investigated the influence of both polymers using flat films and compared P4HB and PP implants with different knitting designs. P4HB flat films were demonstrated to be hydrophilic with significantly less Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli cultured from P4HB films than from hydrophobic PP films after 24 h of incubation. On the implants, a higher number of E. coli were cultured after 1 h of incubation from the knitted P4HB implant with the highest density and smallest pore size, compared to other P4HB and PP implants. No differences were observed between the implants for E. coli at later time points or for S. aureus incubation. These results show that in flat films, the polymer influences biofilm formation, demonstrated by a reduced biofilm formation on P4HB compared with PP flat films. In addition, the knitting design may affect bacterial adhesion. Despite certain design and material characteristics that give the knitted P4HB implants a higher surface area, this did not result in more bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation overall. Collectively, these results warrant further (pre)clinical investigations of P4HB pelvic floor implants.

Management of complications arising from the use of mesh for stress urinary incontinence-International Urogynecology Association Research and Development Committee opinion

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Management of pain or mesh exposure complications after stress incontinence surgery has become a new issue over the last 20 years with the introduction of mesh techniques to treat stress incontinence. There is much debate regarding the incidence of complications and how best to treat them.

METHODS

A working subcommittee from the International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) Research and Development (R&D) Committee was formed. An initial document was drafted based on a literature review. The review focused on complications of vaginal mesh inserted for stress incontinence. After evaluation by the entire IUGA R&D Committee revisions were made. The final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion.

RESULTS

The R&D Committee Opinion reviews the literature on the management of complications arising from the use of mesh for stress urinary incontinence. The review concentrated on the assessment and treatment of pain and exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Complications after surgery for stress incontinence using mesh may not be common occurrences for individual surgeons. Complications may be difficult to manage and outcomes are variable. Specialist centres and a multidisciplinary approach may optimise treatment and reporting of outcomes.

Complications related to use of mesh implants in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse: infection or inflammation?

The surgical mesh material used in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women is associated with significant complications in some women. This has recently become a public health issue with involvement of national parliaments and regulatory bodies. The occurrence of mesh complications is thought to be a result of multifactorial processes involving problems related to the material design, the surgical techniques used and disease, and patient-related factors. However, the infectious complications and mesh–tissue interactions are least studied. The aim of this article is to review any previous clinical and basic scientific evidence about the contribution of infectious and inflammatory processes to the occurrence of mesh-related complications in SUI and POP. A literature search for the relevant publications without any time limits was performed on the Medline database. There is evidence to show that vaginal meshes are associated with an unfavourable host response at the site of implantation. The underlying mechanisms leading to this type of host response is not completely clear. Mesh contamination with vaginal flora during surgical implantation can be a factor modifying the host response if there is a subclinical infection that can trigger a sustained inflammation. More basic science research is required to identify the biological mechanisms causing a sustained inflammation at the mesh–tissue interface that can then lead to contraction, mesh erosion, and pain.

Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Midurethral slings (MUS) are an established treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), with good objective outcomes and low rates of complications. However, large population-based registry studies highlighted long-term complications from polypropylene slings including erosion, dyspareunia and chronic pain. With recent highly negative media coverage, many women are presenting with chronic pain attributed to the mesh to request complete removal. The available literature provides limited evidence on safety, symptom resolution and incontinence following MUS removal.

METHODS

We identified all patients who underwent laparoscopic removal of MUS mesh at our hospital between 2011 and 2016. We extracted data from medical records to assess operative safety and contacted all patients by questionnaire that incorporated pain scales, symptom severity and satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 56 women were assessed. Removal occurred at a median of 44 months following sling insertion (range 3-192). Mean operative time was 74 min (range 44-132). Two patients were returned to theatre (one at 24 hours and one at 14 days) to evacuate a retropubic haematoma, but no visceral injuries occurred. The median inpatient stay was 2 days (range 1-7). Of the 46% of patients who returned the questionnaire (n = 26), 88% said they would recommend the procedure. There was a median 6-point decrease in pain scores (10-point numerical scale, p < 0.0001); 44.6% reported worsening SUI, more common with removal of the suburethral mesh [odds ratio (OR) 10.72 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-104].

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic removal of MUS is feasible and effective but carries a risk of worsening SUI.

Is pain relief after vaginal mesh and/or sling removal durable long term?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This study was to review our experience of pain relief durability in women who experienced initial pain resolution after vaginal mesh and/or sling removal (VMSR).

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of consecutive, nonneurogenic women who underwent VMSR for pain and reported persistent pain relief at the 6-month postoperative follow-up visit were assessed. Pre- and postoperative data collected were self-reported chief complaints, physical examination, other medical conditions associated with chronic pain, use of pain medications, Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (in which question 6 specifically addresses pain), and the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Success was defined by continued resolution of pain assessed by score of 0 on NPRS (0 none to 10 terrible), (0-1 on the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) question 6, subjective report of pain-free status, and/or no chronic use of pain medications other than those prescribed for non-mesh-related pain.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2015, 125 of 356 women met study criteria. Mean follow-up after VMSR was 3.5 (range 0.5-10) years. Among 25 women who did not meet success criteria by questionnaire answers or subjective report, 21 had causes unrelated to their original mesh/sling placement and were pain free after they were addressed. Four women experienced delayed mesh-related pain return at 28, 46, 47, and 54 months, respectively; two required mesh removal surgery. Involvement in lawsuits and chronic pain-related medical conditions did not affect the durability of pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

At a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, the original pain relief noted after VMSR was durably maintained.

Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim was to review complications associated with pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

METHODS

Every 4 years and as part of the Fifth International Collaboration on Incontinence we reviewed the English-language scientific literature after searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, published up to January 2012. Publications were classified as level 1 evidence (randomised controlled trials [RCT] or systematic reviews), level 2 (poor quality RCT, prospective cohort studies), level 3 (case series or retrospective studies) and level 4 (case reports). The highest level of evidence was utilised by the committee to make evidence-based recommendations based upon the Oxford grading system. Grade A recommendation usually depends on consistent level 1 evidence. Grade B recommendation usually depends on consistent level 2 and/or 3 studies, or "majority evidence" from RCTs. Grade C recommendation usually depends on level 4 studies or "majority evidence from level 2/3 studies or Delphi processed expert opinion. Grade D "no recommendation possible" would be used where the evidence is inadequate or conflicting and when expert opinion is delivered without a formal analytical process, such as by Delphi.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Transvaginal mesh has a higher re-operation rate than native tissue vaginal repairs (grade A). If a synthetic mesh is placed via the vaginal route, it is recommended that a macroporous polypropylene monofilament mesh should be used. At sacral colpopexy mesh should not be introduced or sutured via the vaginal route and silicone-coated polyester, porcine dermis, fascia lata and polytetrafluoroethylene meshes are not recommended as grafts. Hysterectomy should also be avoided (grade B). There is no evidence to recommend routine local or systemic oestrogen therapy before or after prolapse surgery using mesh. The first cases should be undertaken with the guidance of an experienced surgeon in the relevant technique (grade C). Expert opinion suggests that by whatever the surgical route pre-operative urinary tract infections are treated, smoking is ceased and antibiotic prophylaxis is undertaken. It is recommended that a non-absorbable synthetic mesh should not be inserted into the rectovaginal septum when a rectal injury occurs. The placement of a non-absorbable synthetic mesh into the vesicovaginal septum may be considered after a bladder injury has been repaired, if the repair is considered to be satisfactory. It is possible to perform a hysterectomy in association with the introduction of a non-absorbable synthetic mesh inserted vaginally, but this is not recommended routinely.

[Surgical site infections in vaginal prolapse surgery]

INTRODUCTION

Vaginal prolapse surgery is at high risk of surgical site infections (SSI) because it's a "clean-contaminated surgery" and it's frequently associated with implantation of meshes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the rate of SSI and associated risk factors in vaginal prolapse surgery with mesh support.

METHODS

In a retrospective unicenter study, two groups of patients were operated by vaginal route for a pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh support. Colporraphy was made by classic surgical sutures non-coated (Monosyn(®) 3/0, B-Braun) in the first group, and surgical sutures coated with triclosan in the second group. We collected risk factors of SSIs using the procedure of the CCLIN and analyzed the occurrence of SSIs with a statistical comparative univariate analysis.

RESULTS

Study included 78 patients in the first group and 72 in the second group. SSIs total rate was 2.6 % (4 of 150), as part of 3 in the group with surgical sutures non-coated and one in the group with surgical sutures coated with triclosan (P=0.62).

CONCLUSION

In our study, SSIs rate in vaginal prolapse surgery was twice higher than classic gynecologic surgery. As the interest of using a surgical suture coated with triclosan to reduce SSI has not been demonstrated statistically, we can't recommend it.

Prevention of complications related to the use of prosthetic meshes in prolapse surgery: guidelines for clinical practice

The objective of the study was to provide guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (CNGOF), based on the best evidence available, concerning adverse events related to surgical procedures involving the use of prosthetic meshes. French and English-language articles from Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database were searched, using key words (mesh; pelvic organ prolapse; cystocele; rectocele; uterine prolapse; complications; adverse event; sacral colpopexy; extrusion; infection). As with any surgery, recommendations include perioperative smoking cessation (Expert opinion) and compliance with the prevention of nosocomial infections (regulatory recommendation). There is no evidence to recommend routine local or systemic estrogen therapy before or after prolapse surgery using mesh, regardless of the surgical approach (Grade C). Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended, regardless of the approach (Expert opinion). It is recommended to check for pre-operative urinary tract infection and treat it (Expert opinion). The first procedure should be undertaken under the guidance of a surgeon experienced in the relevant technique (Grade C). It is recommended not to place a non-absorbable synthetic mesh into the rectovaginal septum when a rectal injury occurs (Expert opinion). Placement of a non-absorbable synthetic mesh into the vesicovaginal septum may be considered after suturing of a bladder injury if the suture is considered to be satisfactory (Expert opinion). If a synthetic mesh is placed by vaginal route, it is recommended to use a macroporous polypropylene monofilament mesh (Grade B). It is recommended not to use polyester mesh for vaginal surgery (Grade B). It is permissible to perform hysterectomy associated with the placement of a non-absorbable synthetic mesh placed by the vaginal route but this is not routinely recommended (Expert opinion). It is recommended to minimize the extent of the colpectomy (Expert opinion). The laparoscopic approach is recommended for sacral colpopexy (Expert opinion). It is recommended not to place and suture meshes by the vaginal route when a sacral colpopexy is performed (Grade B). It is recommended not to use silicone-coated polyester, porcine dermis, fascia lata, and polytetrafluoroethylene meshes (Grade B). It is recommended to use polyester (without silicone coating) or polypropylene meshes (Grade C). Suture of the meshes to the promontory can be performed using thread/needle or tacks (Grade C). Peritonization is recommended to cover the meshes (Grade C). If hysterectomy is required, it is recommended to perform a subtotal hysterectomy (Expert opinion). Implementation of this guideline should decrease the prevalence of complications related to surgical procedures involving the use of prosthetic meshes.

Complications of synthetic slings used in female stress urinary incontinence and applicability of the new IUGA-ICS classification

OBJECTIVES

To analyze different complications of synthetic suburethral slings, and to apply the new "IUGA-ICS classification of complications directly related to the insertion of prosthesis (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery" to the list of complications, check its applicability, and give suggestions regarding possible improvements.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is an analysis of complications of synthetic suburethral slings. Data on type of complication, time interval between the insertion of the prosthesis and the onset of symptoms of complication, type and nature of prosthesis, and management process were documented. Additional descriptions of the sling position in relation to lower urinary tract, shrinkage or prominence of the prosthesis, and intra-operative nature of the prosthetic material were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

From the year 2003 to 2010, 376 women with complications of synthetic suburethral slings were managed surgically and the data were analyzed. Overactive bladder (OAB) at 54%, lower urinary tract obstruction (48%), vaginal exposure (19%), and pain (14%) were the most frequent complications. Infection, fistulae, urinary tract penetration, and groin/thigh pain were other complications. The new IUGA-ICS classification could be applied to most of the types of complications, a notable exception being de novo development of overactive bladder. Also category 4B of IUGA-ICS classifications encompasses a wide clinical variety of complications and may need reconsideration.

CONCLUSION

De novo OAB seems to be the commonest complication of synthetic suburethral slings, followed by obstruction, vaginal exposure, and long term pain. The new IUGA-ICS classification on complications has good general applicability; some minor changes may be useful in the future.

Multilayer, degradable coating as a carrier for the sustained release of antibiotics: preparation and antimicrobial efficacy in vitro

One of the most critical post-surgical complications is mesh-related infection. This paper describes how a commercially available polypropylene (PP) mesh was modified to minimize the risk of post-implantation infection. A dual drug-release coating was created around mesh filaments using an airbrush spray system. This coating was composed of three layers containing ofloxacin and rifampicin dispersed in a degradable polymer reservoir made up of [poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(DL-lactic acid) (PLA)]. Drug release kinetics were managed by varying the structure of the degradable polymer and the multilayer coating. In vitro, this new drug delivery polymer system was seen to be more rapidly invaded by fibroblasts than was the initial PP mesh. Active mesh showed excellent antibacterial properties with regard to microorganism adhesion, biofilm formation and the periprosthetic inhibition of bacterial growth. Sustained release of the two antibiotics from the coated mesh prevented mesh contamination for at least 72 h. This triple-layer coating technology is potentially of great interest for it can be easily extrapolated to other medical devices and drug combinations for the prevention or treatment of other diseases.

Incidence of extrusion following type I polypropylene mesh "kit" repairs in the correction of pelvic organ prolapse

Introduction and Hypothesis. We sought to determine the mesh extrusion (vaginal exposure) rates and subject outcomes following IntePro (Type I polypropylene) mesh “kit” repairs for vaginal prolapse. Methods. Data were pooled from two prospective multicenter studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Perigee and Apogee (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minn, USA) to treat anterior and posterior/apical prolapses, respectively. Extrusions involving the anterior compartment (AC) or posterior compartment/apex (PC/A) were recorded. Results. Two hundred sixty women underwent mesh placement, with a total of 368 mesh units inserted (173 in the AC and 195 in the PC/A). Extrusions were noted in 13 (7.5%) of AC implants and 27 (13.8%) of PC/A implants through 12 months. No difference was seen between those with and without extrusion in regard to anatomic cure, postoperative painor quality of life at 1 year. Conclusions. Extrusion had no apparent effect on short-term outcomes. Given the unknown long-term sequellae of vaginal mesh exposure, a thorough assessment of risks and benefits of transvaginal mesh placement should be considered at the time of preoperative planning.

New antibiotic-eluting mesh used for soft tissue reinforcement

The surgical implantation of prostheses for soft tissue repair may be followed by post-operative mesh-related infection, a significant and dramatic complication, that is treated by mesh removal. A new antibiotic-eluting mesh has been manufactured on pre-existing polypropylene prostheses using an airbrush spraying technology. Among the degradable polymers tested as coating agents and drug reservoirs, poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL), which is deposited after heating, provides a homogeneous, regular and smooth shell around the polypropylene filaments of the mesh without dramatically altering the biomechanical properties of the new modified mesh. An anti-infective drug (e.g. ofloxacin) is incorporated into this polymeric coating giving a limited burst effect followed by sustained drug diffusion for several days. An ofloxacin-eluting mesh has demonstrated excellent antibacterial activity in vitro on Escherichia coli adherence, biofilm formation and inhibitory diameter, even with low drug loads. Although further in vivo investigations are required to draw conclusions on the anti-infective effectiveness of the coated mesh, the airbrush coating of ofloxacin-PCL on existing prostheses is already potentially appealing in an effort to decrease post-operative infection.

Bacterial colonisation of collagen-coated polypropylene vaginal mesh: are additional intraoperative sterility procedures useful?

Introduction and hypothesis

The use of vaginally implanted polypropylene meshes in the treatment of prolapse is becoming increasingly popular. We set out to detect how often bacterial colonisation of the mesh occurs and if the intraoperative sterility procedures that are applied matter.

Methods

In 64 consecutive women, bacterial colonisation was compared between two intraoperative sterility procedures. Culture swabs of the core mesh were taken during surgery, and the mesh arms removed at the end of surgery were cultured separately.

Results

Sixty-seven implants were cultured. In 56 (83.6%) implants, a positive culture with vaginal bacteria was found with very low bacterial density (<10³ colony-forming units). No significant differences in bacterial species, density, clinical infection and erosion (two anterior and one posterior) were found between the two intraoperative sterility methods.

Conclusions

Colonisation of vaginally implanted mesh occurs frequently but in low bacterial densities, irrespective of the intraoperative sterility procedure used.

Foreign body reaction in vaginally eroded and noneroded polypropylene suburethral slings in the female: a case series

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Aim of this study was to investigate the pattern of the foreign body reaction of macroporous polypropylene mesh (MPPM) used in females for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and to compare this pattern between eroded and noneroded tapes.

METHODS

Ten explanted suburethral slings, five eroded and five noneroded, were examined immunohistochemically under light microscopy; the tissue reaction was compared between eroded and noneroded materials.

RESULTS

Eroded material showed a significantly higher accumulation of macrophages around the filaments of the mesh.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study comparing reaction around eroded and noneroded MPPMs and indicates a more intense tissue reaction around eroded mesh, when compared to noneroded material. More studies are needed to prove whether the detected foreign body reaction was the actual trigger for the erosion.