Randomized trial of preemptive local analgesia in vaginal surgery

Exploring the rationale of performing vaginal hysterectomy under local anaesthesia: A single-centre experience

INTRODUCTION

Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is usually performed under general (GA) or regional anaesthesia. In recent years, the possibility of performing vaginal hysterectomy under local anaesthesia (LA) has also been explored. Our aim was to compare intraoperative and early postoperative outcomes in women who underwent VH under LA with intravenous sedation or GA.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we collected data of patients who underwent VH at our department from June 2021 to December 2022. For every patient, the following data was obtained: hospitalisation duration, type of anaesthesia (LA or GA), accompanying procedures, the dosage of used local anaesthetic in the LA group, maximal pain score for each day of hospitalisation after the procedure, procedure duration, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative complication rate. Data was analysed using the SPSS Statistics programme. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were included in the study. The mean age was significantly higher in the LA group compared to GA group (73.8 ± 8.0 years vs. 67.1 ± 9.3 respectively, p-value = 0.003). LA was associated with statistically lower pain scores in the first two days after the procedure (p = 0.003), and shorter procedure duration (p-value <0.001) as well as hospitalisation duration (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the cumulative dosage of different analgesics used during hospitalisation was higher in the GA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that LA is a feasible option for patients undergoing VH. Vaginal surgical procedures under LA could be especially beneficial for older patients with medical comorbidities in whom GA would be particularly hazardous.

Laparoscopic administration of bupivacaine at the uterosacral ligaments during benign laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain continues to be an undermanaged part of the surgical experience. Multimodal analgesia has been adopted in response to the opioid epidemic, but opioid prescribing practices remain high after minimally invasive hysterectomy. Novel adjuvant opioid-sparing analgesia to optimize acute postoperative pain control is crucial in preventing chronic pain and minimizing opioid usage.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the effect of direct laparoscopic uterosacral bupivacaine administration on opioid usage and postoperative pain in patients undergoing benign minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) hysterectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-blinded, triple-arm, randomized controlled trial at an academic medical center between March 15, 2021, and April 8, 2022. The inclusion criteria were patients aged >18 years undergoing benign laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy. The exclusion criteria were non-English-speaking patients, patients with an allergy to bupivacaine or actively using opioid medications, patients undergoing transversus abdominis plane block, and patients undergoing supracervical hysterectomy or combination cases with other surgical services. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to the following uterosacral administration before colpotomy: no administration, 20 mL of normal saline, or 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. All patients received incisional infiltration with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary outcome was 24-hour oral morphine equivalent usage (postoperative day 0 and postoperative day 1). The secondary outcomes were total oral morphine equivalent usage in 7 days, last day of oral morphine equivalent usage, numeric pain scores from the universal pain assessment tool, and return of bowel function. Patients reported postoperative pain scores, total opioid consumption, and return of bowel function via Qualtrics surveys. Patient and surgical characteristics and primary and secondary outcomes were compared using chi-square analysis and 1-way analysis of variance. Multiple linear regression was used to identify predictors of opioid use in the first 24 hours after surgery and total opioid use in the 7 days after surgery.

RESULTS

Of 518 hysterectomies screened, 410 (79%) were eligible, 215 (52%) agreed to participate, and 180 were ultimately included in the final analysis after accounting for dropout. Most hysterectomies (70%) were performed laparoscopically, and the remainder were performed robotically. Most hysterectomies (94%) were outpatient. Patients randomized to bupivacaine had higher rates of former and current tobacco use, and patients randomized to the no-administration group had higher rates of previous surgery. There was no difference in first 24-hour oral morphine equivalent use among the groups (P=.10). Moreover, there was no difference in numeric pain scores (although a trend toward significance in discharge pain scores in the bupivacaine group), total 7-day oral morphine equivalent use, day of last opioid use, or return of bowel function among the groups (P>.05 for all). The predictors of increased 24-hour opioid usage among all patients included only increased postanesthesia care unit oral morphine equivalent usage. The predictors of 7-day opioid usage among all patients included concurrent tobacco use and mood disorder, history of previous laparoscopy, estimated blood loss of >200 mL, and increased oral morphine equivalent usage in the postanesthesia care unit.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic uterosacral administration of bupivacaine at the time of minimally invasive hysterectomy did not result in decreased opioid usage or change in numeric pain scores.

The Effect of Preemptive Local Infiltration on Postoperative Pain After Vaginal Hysterectomy: a Retrospective Study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of preemptive infiltration on postoperative pain and the use of analgesics after vaginal hysterectomy (VH).

DESIGN

A retrospective study.

SETTING

An urogynecology unit in a tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 120 patients who had undergone VH.

INTERVENTIONS

The study group contained 60 patients who participated in a former randomized control study, in which preemptive local infiltration of bupivacaine (n = 30) or sodium chloride 0.9% (n = 30) was performed. The control group included 60 consecutive patients who underwent a VH, for whom no local infiltration was performed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Postoperative pain at rest was assessed using the 10 cm visual analog scale at 3, 8, and 24 hours after surgery. The levels of pain, as well as the use of analgesics, postoperatively, were compared between the groups. The mean surgery length in the infiltration group was shorter (86.4±29 vs 118.6±30, p <.001) and the rate of posterior colporrhaphy was lower (73.1% vs 91.3%, p = .010) than the control group. There were no differences in levels of pain at all points of time. However, the infiltration group required a lower morphine dose in the recovery unit (3.7 ± 2.3 mg vs 5.3 ± 2.4 mg, p <.001) and less use of analgesia (all kinds) 24 hours after surgery (54.2% vs 79.6%, p <.001) compared with the control group. On multivariant analysis, preemptive infiltration was found to be independently inversely associated with the dose of morphine used in recovery, as well as analgesics used 24 hours after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive local infiltration of either bupivacaine or sodium chloride 0.9% reduced the use of morphine in the recovery unit, as well as the use of analgesics 24 hours after VH, compared with no infiltration at all.

Perioperative opioid management for minimally invasive hysterectomy

Given the high volume of hysterectomies performed, the contribution of gynecologists to the opioid crisis is potentially significant. Following a hysterectomy, most patients are over-prescribed opioids, are vulnerable to developing new persistent opioid use, and can be the source of misuse, diversion, or accidental exposure. People who misuse opioids are at risk of an overdose related death, which is now one of the leading causes of death in the United States and is rising in other countries. It is the physician's responsibility to reduce opioid use by making impactful practice changes, such as 1) using pre-emptive opioid sparing strategies, 2) optimizing multimodal nonopioid pain management, 3) restricting postoperative opioid prescribing, and 4) educating patients on proper disposal of unused opioids. These changes can be implemented with an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol, shared decision-making, and patient education strategies related to opioids.

Preemptive Infiltration of Local Anesthetics During Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IMPORTANCE

Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) is the preferred route of choice for women desiring hysterectomy to treat uterine pathology, including premalignant conditions and fibroids.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the use of preemptive local analgesia (LA) on postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes for women undergoing VH.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic search of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov ) was performed for articles published up to January 2021. All randomized controlled trials that presented outcomes of patients who underwent VH due to pelvic floor disorders or other benign gynecological disorders and received local infiltration analgesia were finally included.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies with 277 women (138 LA group vs 199 no-LA group) who underwent a VH were included in the present meta-analysis. Mean pain scores at both 30 minutes to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours postoperatively were significantly lower in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (220 patients: mean difference [MD], -1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.77 to -0.74; P = 0.0007; and 220 patients: MD, -1.68; 95% CI, -2.28 to 1.09; P < 0.00001, respectively). Morphine/narcotic opioid-based consumption up to 24 hours postoperatively was significantly reduced in the LA group compared with the non-LA group (197 patients MD, -9.47 mg; 95% CI, -16.51 to -2.43; P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of preemptive LA during VH seems to be beneficial especially with regard to short-term postoperative pain and opioid use. However, further studies are needed to identify the optimal anesthetic regimen, the dosage, and sites of application aiming to achieve the optimal benefit in the postoperative management.

Preemptive local analgesia at vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We conducted a systematic review of the effectiveness of local preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain control in women undergoing vaginal hysterectomy.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched systematically to identify eligible studies published through September 25, 2019. Only randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews addressing local preemptive analgesia compared to placebo at vaginal hysterectomy were considered. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Results were compared, and disagreement was resolved by discussion. Forty-seven studies met inclusion criteria for full-text review. Four RCTs, including a total of 197 patients, and two SRs were included in the review.

RESULTS

Preemptive local analgesia reduced postoperative pain scores up to 6 h and postoperative opioid requirements in the first 24 h after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive local analgesia at vaginal hysterectomy results in less postoperative pain and less postoperative opioid consumption.

Intrarectal diazepam following pelvic reconstructive surgery: a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with native tissue pelvic reconstruction typically have low pain levels overall in the postoperative period. Notwithstanding, pain control immediately after surgery may be more challenging and a barrier to same-day discharge. Intrarectal diazepam has been used for acute and chronic pelvic pain and has a pharmacokinetic profile ideal for intermittent use. However, its use has not been investigated after the surgical intervention.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of diazepam rectal suppositories on early postoperative pain after hysterectomy and vaginal reconstruction for pelvic organ prolapse.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing postoperative pain scores after vaginal hysterectomy with native tissue prolapse repairs. Patients were randomized to receive either an intrarectal 10-mg diazepam suppository or an identical placebo. Moreover, the participants completed the questionnaires at baseline, the morning of postoperative day 1, and 2 weeks after the operation. Surveys included visual analog scales for pain, a validated Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire, and queries regarding medication side effects and postoperative recovery. The primary outcome was pain scores based on a visual analog scale approximately 3 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes included total morphine equivalents after surgery, patient satisfaction with pain control, same-day discharge outcome, and overall satisfaction. The chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney tests were used. Based on a 10-mm difference in postoperative vaginal pain using the visual analog scale, sample size was calculated to be 55 patients in each arm to achieve 80% power with an alpha of.05.

RESULTS

From February 2020 to August 2021, 130 participants were randomized. Of those participants, 7 withdrew, and 123 were analyzed: 60 in the diazepam group and 63 in the placebo group. The median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 27-80), the median body mass index was 27.9 kg/m² (interquartile range, 18.70-45.90), and 119 of 123 participants (96.7%) were White. There was no difference in the baseline characteristics, prolapse stage, or types of procedures performed between groups. Most participants had concurrent uterosacral ligament suspension with anterior and posterior repairs. Of note, 50 of 123 participants (41%) had midurethral slings. Moreover, 61 of 123 participants (50%) were discharged on the day of surgery. There was no difference in the primary outcome of vaginal pain 3.5 to 6.0 hours postoperatively (25 vs 21 mm; P=.285). In addition, the amount of rescue narcotics used in the immediate postoperative period (19.0 vs 17.0 MME; P=.202) did not differ between groups. At 2-weeks postoperatively, patients in the placebo group reported higher satisfaction with pain control in the hospital (31 vs 43 mm; P=.006) and pain control at home (31 vs 42 mm; P=.022). No difference was noted between same-day discharges and those who were admitted overnight.

CONCLUSION

The placement of a 10-mg diazepam rectal suppository immediately after pelvic reconstructive surgery did not improve pain or narcotic usage in the early postoperative period. Although the placebo group reported slightly higher satisfaction with pain control 2 weeks after surgery, overall pain levels were low. Therefore, we do not believe that the addition of diazepam to the postoperative regimen is warranted.

The effect of preemptive local anesthesia on postoperative pain following vaginal hysterectomy: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to study the effect of preemptive local anesthetic without adrenaline on postoperative pain following vaginal hysterectomy and concomitant trans obturator tape (TOT).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. Women who undergone elective vaginal hysterectomy were included. Solutions of either Bupivacaine-Hydrochloride 0.5%, or Sodium-Chloride 0.9% as a placebo, were prepared prior to surgery, according to randomization. The chosen solution was injected before incision, in a circumferential manner, to the cervix. The amount of fluid administered was 10 ml. When colporrhaphy was also performed, an additional 5 ml of solution were injected in the midline of the vaginal wall prior to each incision line. We conformed to the CONSORT recommendations. By utilizing the 10 cm Visual-analogue-scale (VAS) we assessed post-operative pain at rest at 3, 8, and 24 h, and during ambulation at 8 and 24 h. We estimated that the intervention would cause a 25% reduction in the primary outcome. The required total sample size was calculated to be 30 patients women for each group. We used ANOVA for continuous variables and the Chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 30 women were included in each group. The level of postoperative pain, as assessed by VAS, was not significantly different between the groups, in all points of time. In addition, there was no difference between the groups in opioid based analgesics during recovery, nor in postoperative analgesic use.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive local anesthesia was not shown to be efficient in reducing postoperative pain after vaginal hysterectomy and TOT.

Paracervical Block or Uterosacral Ligament Infiltration for Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective

The aim of this study was to estimate the efficacy of preemptive paracervical block or uterosacral ligament infiltration in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption after benign minimally invasive hysterectomy.

Data Sources

We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar from inception until February 2020.

Methods of Study Selection

We identified randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing the primary outcome of pain and opioid consumption after paracervical block or uterosacral infiltration in benign laparoscopic, vaginal, or robotic hysterectomy. Two investigators evaluated studies for risk of bias and quality of evidence.

Tabulation, Integration, and Results

We reviewed 219 abstracts; 6 studies met the inclusion criteria: 3 using paracervical block (2 vaginal and 1 laparoscopic) and 3 using uterosacral ligament infiltration (all vaginal). Two studies were included in the meta-analysis (both vaginal hysterectomy). Because of lack of numerical data, or comparison, the other 4 studies are reported in narrative form. Three controlled trials reported a moderate benefit from paracervical block up to 8 hours after vaginal and 4 hours after laparoscopic surgery. Meta-analysis could not be performed because of the lack of numerical data for pooling results or the lack of a laparoscopic hysterectomy comparison group. Three trials reported that uterosacral infiltration decreases pain up to 6 hours after vaginal hysterectomy, and meta-analysis pooling the results of 2 of these studies demonstrated improvement in pain up to 4 hours on a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale for pain (-19.97 mm; 95% confidence interval, -29.02 to -10.91; P < 0.000). Five trials reported a moderate reduction in cumulative opioid use within 24 hours after vaginal surgery for both paracervical block and uterosacral infiltration. Meta-analysis was not performed for paracervical block because only 1 trial provided suitable data for pooling. Meta-analysis pooling the results of 2 trials of uterosacral infiltration demonstrated opioid consumption of 20.73 morphine milligram equivalents less compared with controls (95% confidence interval, -23.54 to -17.91; P < 0.000).

Conclusions

There were a total of 6 randomized placebo-controlled studies evaluated in this study. Although a meta-analysis was unable to be performed for all studies because of lack of comparison groups or numerical data, there is evidence that preemptive uterosacral ligament infiltration may reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after vaginal hysterectomy. Our study does not allow us to make any substantive conclusions on the use of paracervical block in vaginal hysterectomy or the use of either type of injection in laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy.

Role of paracervical block in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy: A systematic reivew and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis in order to evaluate the effect of paracervical anesthetic block among women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy.

METHODS

A systematic search was done in Cochrane Library, PubMed, ISI web of science, and Scopus during January 2021. We selected randomized clinical trials (RCTs) compared paracervical anesthetic block versus normal saline (control group) among women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. We pooled the continuous data as mean difference (MD) and dichotomous data as risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals using Revman software. Our primary outcome was pain scores evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) at 30 min and 1 hour. Our secondary outcomes were postoperative additional opioids requirement and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Three RCTs met our inclusion criteria with a total number of 233 patients. We found that paracervical anesthetic block was linked to a significant reduction in VAS pain score at 30 min and 1 hour post-hysterectomy (MD= -2.13, 95% CI [-3.09, -1.16], p>0.001 & MD= -1.87, 95% CI [-3.22, -0.52], p = 0.006). There was a significant decrease in additional opioids requirement postoperatively among paracervical anesthetic block group in comparison with control group (p = 0.002). No significant difference was found between both groups regarding the length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Paracervical anesthetic block is effective in reducing postoperative pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with decrease in opioids administration postoperatively.

Role of para-cervical block in reducing immediate postoperative pain after total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial

Objective

To study the efficacy and safety of 0.5% bupivacaine in paracervical block to reduce immediate postoperative pain after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Methods

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted at a tertiary referral center involving thirty women each in the treatment and placebo groups. Paracervical block with 10 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine (treatment group) or 0.9% saline (placebo group) was administered following general anesthesia and prior to proceeding with total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 30 and 60 minutes post extubation and mean VAS score (average VAS score at 30 and 60 minutes) were compared. Adequate pain control was defined as mean VAS score ≤5. Additional postoperative opioid requirement, hospital stay, and readmissions were also compared.

Results

Baseline variables such as age, previous history of cesarean section, operating time, and weight of the specimen were comparable in both groups. VAS scores at 30 (5.0±2.8 vs. 7.0±1.4) and 60 minutes (5.2±2.8 vs. 7.0±0.8) and the mean VAS score (5.1±2.7 vs. 6.8±0.9) were significantly lower in the treatment group. Adequate pain control (mean VAS score ≤5) was 57% higher and additional opioid consumption was 47% lower in the treatment group. No significant difference was found in the duration of hospital stay and readmission rate.

Conclusion

Paracervical block with bupivacaine was useful in reducing immediate postoperative pain with a 25% reduction in mean VAS score and a 47% reduction in opioid consumption in the first hour after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Pre-emptive digitally guided pudendal block after posterior vaginal repair

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim of this study was to establish if digitally guided pre-emptive pudendal block (PDB) reduces postoperative pain and facilitates recovery after posterior vaginal repair under local anesthesia and sedation.

Methods

We carried out a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in an outpatient surgery facility. Forty-one women between 18 and 70 years of age, scheduled for primary posterior vaginal reconstructive outpatient surgery, completed the study. The surgery was performed using sedation and local anesthesia with bupivacaine/adrenaline. At the end of surgery, 20 ml of either ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml or sodium chloride (placebo) was administered as a digitally guided PDB. The primary aim was to establish if PDB with ropivacaine compared with placebo reduced the maximal pain as reported by visual analog scale (VAS) during the first 24 h after surgery. Secondary aims were to compare the duration and experience of the hospital stay, nausea, need for additional opioids, and adverse events.

Results

PDB with ropivacaine after local infiltration with bupivacaine/adrenaline after outpatient posterior repair did not significantly reduce maximal postoperative pain, need for hospital admittance, nausea, or opioid use. Mild transient sensory loss occurred after ropivacaine in two women. Two women the placebo group were unable to void owing to severe postoperative pain, which was resolved by a rescue PDB.

Conclusions

When bupivacaine/adrenaline is used for anesthesia in posterior vaginal repair, PDB with ropivacaine gives no benefit regarding postoperative pain, recovery or length of hospital stay. Rescue PDB can be useful for postoperative pain relief.

Use of Paracervical Block Before Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy

Background and Objective:

Some patients who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy request overnight admission for pain management, thus increasing costs for a surgery that is safe for same-day discharge. We wanted to evaluate whether a paracervical block of bupivacaine with epinephrine before laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy would decrease overnight admission rates, postoperative pain, and pain medication requirement

Methods:

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial (Canadian Task Force classification I) at an academic medical center. Patients undergoing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy were randomized to a 20-mL paracervical injection of either 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine or 20 mL normal saline before skin incision. All providers, except the circulating nurse, were blinded. The primary outcome was overnight hospital admission rate. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain medication use and pain scores. Analysis included t test, χ², Wilcoxon, and ANOVA.

Results:

One hundred thirty-two patients were enrolled—68 in the treatment group and 64 in the placebo group. Demographics were similar between groups. The unplanned overnight admission rate was 34% for the treatment group and 27% for the placebo group (P = .25). After discharge, the treatment group used on average 8.5 tablets of narcotics, whereas the placebo group used 11.7 tablets (P = .07). The treatment group took 13.1 tablets of nonnarcotic analgesics compared to 11.2 in the placebo group (P = .57). Both groups reported similar pain scores.

Conclusion:

Paracervical block with bupivacaine and epinephrine before laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy did not decrease overnight admission rate or affect postoperative pain. Postoperative opiate use was minimally decreased.

Techniques for Preemptive Analgesia in Gynecologic Surgery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To provide surgeons with techniques for preemptive analgesia during minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Postoperative pain management is an important component of patient care after gynecologic surgery. There have been numerous advances in pain management, including studies that show that preoperative administration of analgesics decreases postoperative pain scores and narcotic medication requirements [1-3]. However, there is limited information on the techniques for preemptive analgesia [4,5].

DESIGN

An instructional video showing a variety of preemptive analgesia techniques and the corresponding neuroanatomy (Canadian Task Force classification III). Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approval was not required for this video article.

SETTING

Academic Medical Center INTERVENTIONS: Relevant abdominopelvic neuroanatomy is reviewed. This is followed by a demonstration of the preemptive analgesia techniques based on neuroanatomy principles.

CONCLUSION

Techniques for preemptive analgesia are simple and effective. These tools can be used for patients undergoing gynecologic surgeries via a vaginal or abdominal approach and can help optimize postoperative pain and narcotic usage.

Non-opioid pain management in benign minimally invasive hysterectomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Less postoperative pain typically is associated with a minimally invasive hysterectomy compared with a laparotomy approach; however, poor pain control can still be an issue. Multiple guidelines exist for managing postoperative pain, yet most are not specialty-specific and are based on procedures that bear little relevance to a minimally invasive hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is enough quality evidence within the benign gynecology literature to make non-opioid pain control recommendations for women who undergo a benign minimally invasive hysterectomy.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

We queried PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane databases using MeSH terms: "postoperative pain," "perioperative pain," "postoperative analgesia," "pain management," "pain control," "minimally invasive gynecologic surgery," and "hysterectomy." A manual examination of references from identified studies was also performed. All PubMed published studies that involved minimally invasive hysterectomies through November 9, 2016, were included. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were restricted to benign minimally invasive hysterectomies evaluating non-opioid pharmacologic therapies. Primary outcomes included amount of postoperative analgesics consumed and postoperative pain scores. Two reviewers independently completed an in-depth evaluation of each study for characteristics and results using an established database, according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. A risk assessment was performed, and a quality rating was assigned with the use of the Cochrane Collaboration's Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

RESULTS

Initially 1155 studies were identified, and 24 studies met all inclusion criteria. Based on limited data of varying quality, intravenous acetaminophen, anticonvulsants and dexamethasone demonstrate opioid-sparing benefits; ketorolac shows mixed results in laparoscopic hysterectomies. Paracervical blocks provide pain-reducing benefits in vaginal hysterectomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Convincing conclusions are difficult to draw because of the heterogeneous and contradictory nature of the literature. There is a clear need for more high-quality research that will evaluate each medication type for posthysterectomy pain control.

Randomized controlled trial of postoperative belladonna and opium rectal suppositories in vaginal surgery

BACKGROUND

After vaginal surgery, oral and parenteral narcotics are used commonly for pain relief, and their use may exacerbate the incidence of sedation, nausea, and vomiting, which ultimately delays convalescence. Previous studies have demonstrated that rectal analgesia after surgery results in lower pain scores and less intravenous morphine consumption. Belladonna and opium rectal suppositories may be used to relieve pain and minimize side effects; however, their efficacy has not been confirmed.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate the use of belladonna and opium suppositories for pain reduction in vaginal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that used belladonna and opium suppositories after inpatient or outpatient vaginal surgery was conducted. Vaginal surgery was defined as (1) vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension or (2) posthysterectomy prolapse repair that included uterosacral ligament suspension and/or colporrhaphy. Belladonna and opium 16A (16.2/60 mg) or placebo suppositories were administered rectally immediately after surgery and every 8 hours for a total of 3 doses. Patient-reported pain data were collected with the use of a visual analog scale (at 2, 4, 12, and 20 hours postoperatively. Opiate use was measured and converted into parenteral morphine equivalents. The primary outcome was pain, and secondary outcomes included pain medication, antiemetic medication, and a quality of recovery questionnaire. Adverse effects were surveyed at 24 hours and 7 days. Concomitant procedures for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse did not preclude enrollment.

RESULTS

Ninety women were randomly assigned consecutively at a single institution under the care of a fellowship-trained surgeon group. Demographics did not differ among the groups with mean age of 55 years, procedure time of 97 minutes, and prolapse at 51%. Postoperative pain scores were equivalent among both groups at each time interval. The belladonna and opium group used a mean of 57 mg morphine compared with 66 mg for placebo (P=.43) in 24 hours. Patient satisfaction with recovery was similar (P=.59). Antiemetic and ketorolac use were comparable among groups. Subgroup analyses of patients with prolapse and patients <50 years old did not reveal differences in pain scores. The use of belladonna and opium suppositories was uncomplicated, and adverse effects, which included constipation and urinary retention, were similar among groups.

CONCLUSION

Belladonna and opium suppositories are safe for use after vaginal surgery. Belladonna and opium suppositories did not reveal lower pain or substantially lower narcotic use. Further investigation may be warranted to identify a population that may benefit optimally from belladonna and opium use.

The effect of preemptive pudendal nerve block on pain after anterior and posterior vaginal repair

Introduction:

Anterior and posterior vaginal repair (APR) is a common surgery for women with prolapse of pelvic organs which creates post-operative pain because of damage of tissues that we should manage and control this pain. For this purpose, this study was conducted in order to evaluate the effect of preemptive pudendal nerve block on post-operative pain in anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair.

Materials and Methods:

In a double-blinded clinical trial study, 60 women candidates of APR were randomly divided to two groups. In both of them was injected 0.3 cc/kg bupivacaine 0.25% for the intervention group or normal saline for the control group in pudendal nerve tract with the guide of nerve stimulator. A visual analog scale was used to measure pain during the first 48 h after the surgery. Data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results:

Compared with the intervention group, the control group experienced greater pain during rest and walking. There were significant differences between the two groups from the first post-operative hour (P = 0.003) until 48 h after the operation (P = 0.021). Furthermore, the mean ± SD values of pain in the sitting position was not significantly different between control and intervention groups at the same time (P = 0.340).

Conclusion:

Preemptive pudendal nerve block can reduce post-operative pain score in anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair and this method was suggested in anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair.

Pain management strategies for urogynecologic surgery: a review

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to review the recent literature on surgical pain management strategies and to identify those pertinent to urogynecologic surgery.

METHODS

A literature search using Pubmed and MEDLINE was performed for trials on pain management in gynecologic surgery. Evidenced-based recommendations for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative pain control strategies for gynecologic procedures by various surgical routes were identified. Articles specifically describing urogynecologic procedures were sought, but quality, randomized trials on pain management modalities in other gynecologic procedures were also included.

RESULTS

Although few randomized trials on pain management strategies in urogynecologic surgery exist, quality evidence suggests that several preemptive and multimodal analgesia strategies reduce pain and opioid-related adverse events in abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal surgery. Evidence supporting these strategies is outlined. Many are likely applicable to urogynecologic procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence guiding pain management in specific urogynecologic procedures is sparse and should be sought in future studies. When possible, procedure-specific strategies, including preemptive and multimodal techniques, should be implemented.

Postoperative pain and preemptive local anesthetic infiltration in hallux valgus surgery

BACKGROUND

Several techniques of anesthesia are used in foot surgery. Preemptive analgesia helps to prevent the development of hypersensitivity in the perioperative period. The aim of our study was to assess the role of preemptive local anesthetic infiltration and postoperative pain after hallux valgus surgery.

METHODS

We evaluated 118 patients who underwent modified chevron and mini-invasive Mitchell-Kramer bunionectomy of the first distal metatarsal. After spinal anesthesia each patient randomly received an infiltration of local anesthetic or the same amount of normal saline 10 minutes before the skin incision. We measured the intensity of pain 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 72 hours after the release of the tourniquet using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Rescue analgesia and all other side effects were noted.

RESULTS

Preemptive analgesia resulted in less pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. The decrease of VAS score was significantly lower in the study group during all the short postoperative periods measured. The rescue analgesia was administered in 11.9% of patients in the injected group and 42.4% in the placebo group (P < .05). In the injected group we did not observe significant difference in VAS score between patients post-chevron and miniinvasive Mitchell-Kramer osteotomy of the first distal metatarsal. No systemic adverse effects were noted. One persistent injury of dorsomedial cutaneous nerve was observed.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive local anesthetic infiltration was an efficient and safe method to reduce postoperative pain after hallux valgus surgery. The analgesic effect was satisfactory in both traditional and minimally invasive techniques.

Vaginal hysterectomy: past, present, and future

Vaginal hysterectomy is the oldest and least invasive of the hysterectomy techniques and fulfills the evidence-based requirements as the preferred route of hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease. Currently, vaginal hysterectomy is commonly utilized for treating uterine prolapse, but despite proven safety and effectiveness, the use of vaginal hysterectomy for treating non-prolapse conditions has been and remains underutilized in surgical practice. Improving the use of vaginal hysterectomy in the future will likely depend on addressing the key issues of training and maintaining skills in the technique and increasing awareness of the scientific evidence supporting its use.

Pre-emptive analgesia for postoperative pain control: a review

Pain can play an important role at the social and psychological level; hence one of the major goals of anaesthesia is to control and reduce the incidence of postoperative pain. The use of an analgesia before surgical incision may offer one of the most innovative and promising strategies for better pain control throughout the perioperative period. Pre-emptive analgesia refers to pharmacological intervention initiated prior to a painful stimulus in order to inhibit nociceptive mechanisms before they are triggered. Pre-emptive analgesia has three objectives: to reduce pain resulting from the activation of inflammatory mechanisms triggered by surgical incision; to hinder the pain memory response of the central nervous system; and to ensure a good control of postoperative pain in order to avoid the development of chronic pain. The following provides an overview of the scientific rationale for pre-emptive analgesia alongside an overview of published systematic reviews and randomized clinical trials related to this topic.