Are we missing an opportunity to teach future physicians about female pelvic floor disorders?

Pelvic organ prolapse: Women's experiences of Accessing Care & Recommendations for improvement

Up to 50% of women will develop pelvic organ prolapse (POP) over their lifetime. Symptoms include pain, bulge, urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms affecting all aspects of a woman's life.Many women with POP symptoms present initially to primary care settings. Research has shown these interactions are often unsatisfactory, with women reporting their health care professional (HCP) trivialized their symptoms or appeared to have poor knowledge about pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD).Aim The aim of this qualitative study was to explore experiences of younger women seeking treatment for POP and their recommendations for improvements.Methods Ethics approval was obtained (LS-21-01-Carroll-Ful). Women with POP were recruited from an online support group (n = 930 members). Inclusion criteria: adult women, diagnosed with POP and aware of their POP stage. Following informed consent, a demographic questionnaire, interview questions and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) were forwarded. Semi-structured zoom audio-recorded interviews were conducted. Thematic analysis was undertaken; transcripts coded, and themes identified.Results Fourteen women aged 32-41, parity 1-3, with POP Grade 1-3 participated. Many women reported HCPs as dismissive or not appreciative of the impact of their condition. Others described interactions with HCPs who they felt listened, understood the impact of their POP, gave simple explanations, a positive prognosis and outlined a realistic treatment plan.Current antenatal education, post-partum care and primary HCP screening for PFD were identified by women as deficient. Many highlighted delays in accessing specialist care for POP. Women made several recommendations for improvements to the current model of care.Conclusions Increased focus on person-centred care, particularly emotional support, information and education may improve younger women's experiences when seeking care for POP.

Female sexual dysfunction in undergraduate medical education: a survey of U.S. medical students

Background

Physicians often report low levels of confidence in diagnosing and treating female sexual dysfunction (FSD), which may stem from inadequate education and exposure to the topic.

Aim

The study sought to determine the extent to which FSD is covered in undergraduate medical education and evaluate student comfort with the topic and familiarity with treatments.

Methods

We created a novel, 50-question survey to be administered online to any current U.S. medical student. Obstetrician-gynecologist clerkship directors at 146 U.S. medical schools were contacted and asked to invite any current student at their school to participate. A link to the electronic REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) survey was distributed to eligible students via the clerkship directors. The survey collected data regarding (1) coverage of FSD and male sexual dysfunction (MSD) in preclinical and clinical curricula, (2) student self-ratings of comfort in hypothetical scenarios in which a patient exhibits symptoms of FSD or MSD, and (3) student familiarity with treatments for FSD and MSD.

Outcomes

Outcomes included the proportion of students reporting that their school covered FSD/MSD in its preclinical/clinical curriculum, the mean comfort ratings for each of the FSD and MSD scenarios, and the proportion of students indicating knowledge of various FSD and MSD treatments.

Results

A smaller proportion of students (N = 236) reported receiving instruction in FSD (58.5%) compared with MSD (78.4%) in their preclinical curriculum (P < .001). Students' average self-ratings of comfort in the sexual dysfunction scenarios were significantly lower for patients with symptoms of FSD compared with MSD (P < .001). Students had higher average self-ratings of confidence in FSD scenarios if their intended specialty was obstetrician-gynecologist (P = .003), if their school included FSD in its clinical curriculum (P = .01), and if they had ever participated in the care of a patient with FSD (P = .006).

Clinical Implications

There are important gaps in the coverage of FSD in undergraduate medical education that may be mitigated through improvements to curriculum and increased exposure to patients with FSD.

Strengths and Limitations

This is the first study, to our knowledge, to directly survey medical students regarding their educational experience and comfort with FSD. Our study was limited by a small sample size, the use of a novel and nonvalidated questionnaire, and the potential for bias given our sampling method.

Conclusion

Medical schools must work toward improving instruction in FSD for their students to address these disparities and improve students' comfort with the topic.

The multicenter urogynecology study on education: associations between educational outcomes and clerkship center characteristics

OBJECTIVE

: The objective of the study was to examine the effect of center characteristics on educational experiences and female pelvic medicine knowledge changes in third-year students at 6 medical schools.

METHODS

: In this secondary analysis of data acquired during a prospective, multicenter study conducted from May 2008 through June 2009, preclerkship and postclerkship third-year medical students scored their knowledge of 12 female pelvic medicine topics and 4 office procedures (knowledge scores [KSs]). Postclerkship, students also reported the number and type of learning experiences they had encountered. Participating investigators provided data on length of clerkship, number of residents, number of fellowship-trained urogynecologists, presence of a fellowship program, clerkship grading system type, presence of a urogynecology clerkship rotation, and presence of a urogynecology lecture. Analyses used Wilcoxon tests/Spearman correlation, with an α = 0.05.

RESULTS

: Paired preclerkship and postclerkship survey data were available for 323 students. Increased numbers of learning experiences were positively associated with number of clerkship weeks (rs = 0.22, P < 0.001), presence of a urogynecology rotation (P = 0.03), and urogynecology lecture (P < 0.001). Knowledge scores were positively associated with the number of fellowship-trained urogynecology faculty (rs = 0.17, P = 0.002) and grading system (letter grades > pass/fail) (P < 0.001). Knowledge scores were negatively associated with increasing numbers of residents (rs = -0.29, P < 0.001) and presence of a urogynecology fellowship program (P < 0.001). The center characteristics of fellowship program and number of residents were highly correlated (rs = 0.74, P < 0.001); thus, multivariate modeling was not performed.

CONCLUSIONS

: The presence of fellowship-trained faculty, urogynecology rotation, longer duration of clerkship, and urogynecology lecture were positively correlated with higher subjective KSs. The inverse association of KS with increased resident number and presence of fellowship was an unexpected finding.