Predicting anal sphincter defects: the value of clinical examination and manometry

Correlation of anorectal symptoms and endoanal ultrasound findings after obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS)

INTRODUCTION

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) predispose to development of anorectal symptoms that affect women's quality of life.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted for all women with singleton vaginal deliveries who had a primary OASIS repair and attended the Postpartum Perineal Clinic between July 1st 2017 and December 31st 2020. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Board. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine correlation between endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) findings and anorectal symptoms quantified by the St. Mark's Incontinence Score (SMIS), (2) to determine the incidence of residual anal sphincter defects, and (3) to determine the rate of clinical overdiagnosis of OASIS. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess correlation between anorectal symptoms and EAUS findings.

RESULTS

A total of 247 participants with clinical diagnosis of OASIS met the inclusion criteria. A 3rd-degree tear was identified in 126 (51.0%) and 4th-degree tear was identified in 30 (12.1%) participants. In participants with sonographic evidence of OASIS, there was a statistically significant weak positive correlation between the size of residual defect and SMIS for both external anal sphincter (EAS) (r = .3723, p < .0001) and internal anal sphincter (IAS) (r = .3122, p = .0180). Residual defect in the anorectal sphincter of greater than 1 hour (> 30°) in width was present in 64.3% participants with 3rd-degree tear and 86.7% participants with 4th-degree tear. The rate of overdiagnosis was 36.8%.

CONCLUSION

The size of residual defect of EAS and IAS has a weak positive correlation with anorectal symptoms, emphasizing the importance of EAUS for counselling regarding mode of subsequent delivery.

Getting the size right: Are clinicians ready for it?

Objectives Digital examination has many uses in obstetrics and gynaecology, including cervical assessment in labour and measuring for vaginal pessaries. Clinicians must be adequately trained to perform accurate digital assessments and use this information to make decisions. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of a clinician’s estimate for three different measuring tasks and assess whether there was any difference in the accuracy in relation to seniority or job role. Study design Doctors and midwives were recruited from two perineal trauma training events. Estimates and measurements for three different activities were recorded: length of own index finger, length of an anal sphincter model and cervical dilatation at two different dilatations (7 cm and 9 cm) using a pocket guide cervical dilatation tool. The results were analysed for accuracy of measurements according to job role and seniority. Results A total of 369 participants took part. Only 4.6% of participants accurately (to 0.1 cm) estimated the length of their index finger (0% of midwives and 5.5% of doctors). There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) when comparing average differences between estimated and actual lengths measured for doctors and midwives for almost all measurements. When comparing doctors based on seniority there was no significant difference in the accuracy of estimated lengths. A higher percentage of midwives than doctors were accurate at both 7 cm (22% vs 16.1%) and 9 cm (30.5% vs 29.5%) dilated. Conclusion We found that accuracy was poor for both doctors and midwives when asked to estimate various measurements. We suggest that training will improve awareness of finger length and therefore improve accuracy when performing digital examinations in clinical practice.

Can digital rectal examination be used to detect cauda equina compression in people presenting with acute cauda equina syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies

BACKGROUND

Digital rectal examination (DRE) is a commonly used test to help identify people with cauda equina compression (CEC).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of DRE in assessment of anal tone, squeeze, sensation and reflexes, as predictors of CEC.

DESIGN

A systematic review to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of DRE to detect CEC compared with lumbar Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

METHOD

Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 6 July 2020 for studies published in English. Two assessors independently performed screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (QUADAS-2). Meta-analysis was performed using STATA-16.

RESULTS

Six studies were included (n = 741). The sensitivity of anal tone was low across all studies (range: 0.23 to 0.53) with moderate quality evidence against the use of DRE of anal tone. One study on anal sensation found no correlation with CEC using Kendall's tau test: p = 0.102 and another found sensation had low test accuracy. One study identified sensitivity: 0.29 and specificity: 0.96 for anal squeeze, while another identified sensitivity: 0.38 and specificity: 0.6 for anal reflexes.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic accuracy of DRE of anal tone to detect CEC is low and carries a high risk of false reassurance. It is therefore not recommended in any clinical setting. More research is needed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of DRE of anal squeeze, sensation and reflexes and if done the results should be interpreted with caution.

Establishing a peripartum perineal trauma clinic: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is not rare, and its consequences are multiple and potentially severe, especially for young women. Some dedicated perineal clinics have been established to improve the management of OASI. Despite their obvious importance, these specific clinics are underrepresented and underdeveloped. The objectives of this review are to explore various options for developing a peripartum perineal clinic and to compare the different practices regarding the mode of delivery for subsequent pregnancies after an OASI.

METHODS

This narrative review covers information from patients' questionnaires specific to anal incontinence, anal physiology assessment, pelvic floor and anal sphincter imaging, and the arguments for choosing the mode of delivery after an OASI.

RESULTS

This review highlights the extensive range of practices regarding the delivery mode after an OASI throughout national professional organizations and experienced perineal clinics.

CONCLUSION

This review summarizes the different choices in developing a perineal clinic to facilitate their development in promoting health care and education specific for peripartum women concerning the perineal consequences of delivery for obstetrician-gynaecologists, family doctors, and residents.

Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence is a disabling condition affecting up to 20% of women.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated fecal incontinence assessment in both inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients to propose a diagnostic approach for inflammatory bowel disease trials.

METHODS

We searched on Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library for all studies on adult inflammatory bowel disease and non-inflammatory bowel disease patients reporting data on fecal incontinence assessment from January 2009 to December 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 328 studies were included; 306 studies enrolled non-inflammatory bowel disease patients and 22 studies enrolled inflammatory bowel disease patients. In non-inflammatory bowel disease trials the most used tools were the Wexner score, fecal incontinence quality of life questionnaire, Vaizey score and fecal incontinence severity index (in 187, 91, 62 and 33 studies). Anal manometry was adopted in 41.2% and endoanal ultrasonography in 34.0% of the studies. In 142 studies (46.4%) fecal incontinence evaluation was performed with a single instrument, while in 64 (20.9%) and 100 (32.7%) studies two or more instruments were used. In inflammatory bowel disease studies the Wexner score, Vaizey score and inflammatory bowel disease quality of life questionnaire were the most commonly adopted tools (in five (22.7%), five (22.7%) and four (18.2%) studies). Anal manometry and endoanal ultrasonography were performed in 45.4% and 18.2% of the studies.

CONCLUSION

Based on prior validation and experience, we propose to use the Wexner score as the first step for fecal incontinence assessment in inflammatory bowel disease trials. Anal manometry and/or endoanal ultrasonography should be taken into account in the case of positive questionnaires.

Anorectal Manometry Versus Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as a Predictor of Maximal Treatment for Fecal Incontinence

PURPOSE

This study aims to establish the ability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and anorectal manometry (ARM) in predicting the need for surgery in patients with fecal incontinence (FI).

METHODS

Between 2008 and 2015, PROMs data, including the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Wexner Incontinence Score and ARM results, were prospectively collected from 276 patients presenting with FI. Spearman rank was used to assess correlations between specific PROMs questions and ARM assessments of sphincter motor function. Binomial regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of the need for surgery. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to establish the utility of individual ARM and PROMs variables in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with FI.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-eight patients (82.60%) were treated conservatively while 48 (17.39%) underwent surgery. On univariate analyses, all 4 domains of the BBUSQ, all 8 domains of the SF-36, and the Wexner Incontinence Score were significant predictors of surgery. Additionally, maximum resting pressure, 5-second squeeze endurance, threshold volume, and urge volume were significant. On ROC curve analyses, the only significant ARM measurement was the 5-second squeeze endurance. PROMs, such as the incontinence domain of the BBUSQ and five of the SF-36 domains, were identified as fair discriminators of the need for surgery.

CONCLUSION

PROMs are reliable predictors of maximal treatment in patients with FI and can be readily used in primary care to aid surgical referrals and can be applied in hospital settings as an aid to guide surgical treatment decisions.

What is the total impact of an obstetric anal sphincter injury? An Australian retrospective study

Introduction

Most data on obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) reflect short-term (< 12 months) or much longer term (> 10 years) impact. This study aimed to collate the extent of medium-term symptomology (1–6 years) and observe the effect on future birth choices to evaluate the cumulative impact of OASI in affected women.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of women affected by OASI completed a questionnaire covering bowel symptomology, sexual function, life impact and future birth choices. A custom-created adverse composite outcome for OASI incorporating effects on daily life, flatal/fecal incontinence and sexual function (OASIACO) was used as a threshold score to identify women with high levels of symptoms.

Results

Of 265 eligible and contactable women, 210 questionnaires were received (response rate 79%) at a mean of 4 years post-OASI. More than half (54%) experienced an OASIACO. A forceps birth (p = 0.03) or more severe grade of tear (p = 0.03) was predictive of OASIACO. One hundred one women had further children, with 48% reporting their delivery choices were impacted, 32% electing a cesarean delivery and 26% shifting to private care. Eighty women (40%) had not given birth again, and 29 (36%) of these indicated their OASI influenced this decision.

Conclusions

The total impact of an OASI on women affected is substantial. More than half experience ongoing symptoms and close to half report an impact on their future birth choices. It follows there would be a consequential load on the healthcare sector, and improved management and prevention programs should be implemented.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-04108-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of 3 ultrasound modalities for diagnosing obstetric anal sphincter injuries

BACKGROUND

The optimal imaging modality of obstetric anal sphincter injuries needs to take into consideration convenience, availability, and ability to assess the sphincter morphologic condition. Endoanal ultrasound imaging currently is regarded as the reference standard, but it is not widely available in obstetric units. Exoanal alternatives exist, such as 3-dimensional introital or transperineal ultrasound imaging, which are already readily available in most obstetrics and gynecology units.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of 3-dimensional introital and 3-dimensional transperineal ultrasound imaging compared with 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound imaging as the reference standard for the detection of anal sphincter defects in women who sustained obstetric anal sphincter injuries. The secondary objective was to correlate a diagnosis of anal sphincter defect on imaging to symptoms of anal incontinence, and to assess patient discomfort that is experienced for each imaging modality.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study was conducted of 250 women who sustained obstetric anal sphincter injuries, all of whom underwent 3-dimensional introital, transperineal, and endoanal ultrasound imaging. Introital and transperineal ultrasound imaging were assessed with tomographic ultrasound imaging. All of the women completed a validated modified St Mark's Score and Visual Analogue Score for discomfort. Optimal cut-off values for a significant defect on tomographic ultrasound imaging were defined as those with the greatest sensitivity and specificity based on receiver operating characteristic curves with endoanal ultrasound imaging as the reference standard. Diagnostic test characteristics of introital and transperineal ultrasound imaging were calculated with the use of these optimal cut-offs.

RESULTS

Optimal cut-off for a significant external anal sphincter defect was ≥3 of 7 slices; sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 and 0.75 on introital imaging and 0.70 and 0.69 on transperineal ultrasound imaging. Optimal cut-off for a significant internal anal sphincter defect was ≥2 of 5 slices; sensitivity and specificity were 0.59 and 0.84 on introital imaging and 0.43 and 0.97 on transperineal ultrasound imaging. The area under the curve for the diagnosis of external and internal anal sphincter defects ranged from 0.70-0.74 (P<.001) for introital and transperineal imaging. Positive predictive value for external and internal sphincter defects ranged from 0.37-0.63, and negative predictive value ranged from 0.85-0.93 for introital and transperineal ultrasound imaging. Endoanal ultrasound imaging was the only modality for a defect to correlate with symptoms; mean modified St. Mark's score for a defect sphincter was 2.4 (standard deviation, 4.1) and for an intact sphincter was 0.9 (standard deviation, 2.7; P<.01). Introital and transperineal ultrasound imaging were associated with less discomfort than endoanal ultrasound imaging.

CONCLUSION

Endoanal ultrasound imaging remains the most accurate diagnostic imaging modality. With low positive predictive values, introital and transperineal ultrasound imaging are not suitable for the identification of sphincter defects; however, high negative predictive values show a good ability to detect an intact sphincter. The optimal cut-off number of slices on tomographic ultrasound imaging for external and internal anal sphincters allows for standardization of a significant defect. In women with a history of obstetric anal sphincter injuries, introital and transperineal ultrasound imagings are suitable to screen for an intact sphincter if endoanal ultrasound imaging is not available. When defects are found, women should then have endoanal ultrasound imaging to verify the diagnosis.

Medium- to Long-term Follow-up of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injury is the primary modifiable risk factor for anal incontinence in women. Currently, endoanal ultrasound is most commonly used to detect residual anal sphincter defects after childbirth. Translabial ultrasound has recently been introduced as a noninvasive alternative.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine medium- to long-term outcomes in women after obstetric anal sphincter injuries diagnosed and repaired at delivery.

DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study.

SETTINGS

This study was performed in a tertiary obstetric unit.

PATIENTS

Between 2005 and 2015, 707 women were diagnosed with obstetric anal sphincter injuries; 146 followed an invitation for follow-up.

INTERVENTIONS

Clinical examination, anal manometry, and translabial ultrasound were performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were the St Mark incontinence score and the evidence of sphincter disruption on translabial ultrasound.

RESULTS

Of 372 contactable patients, 146 attended at a mean follow-up of 6.6 years (1.7-11.9), of which 75 (51%) reported symptoms of anal incontinence with a median "bother score" of 6 (interquartile range, 3-8). Median St Mark score was 3 (interquartile range, 2-5). Twenty-four (16%) had a score of ≥5. Women who had been diagnosed with a 3c/4th degree tear had more symptoms (58% vs 44%), significantly lower mean maximal resting pressure (p < 0.001), maximal squeeze pressure (p < 0.001), and more residual external (p < 0.001) and internal (p = 0.012) sphincter defects in comparison with those who had a 3a/3b tear. Women with residual external sphincter defects had lower mean maximal squeeze pressure (p = 0.02). Residual internal sphincter defects (p = 0.001) and levator avulsion (p = 0.048) are independent risk factors for anal incontinence on multivariate modeling.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the lack of predelivery data of bowel symptoms and BMI and incomplete intrapartum documentation of tear grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptoms of anal incontinence were highly prevalent (51%), with a high bother score of 6. St Mark scores were associated with residual internal anal sphincter defects and levator avulsion. Women who had a higher tear grade showed a higher incidence of residual sphincter defects and lower manometry pressures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A824.

Effect of subsequent vaginal delivery on bowel symptoms and anorectal function in women who sustained a previous obstetric anal sphincter injury

Introduction and hypothesis

Our primary objective was to prospectively evaluate anorectal symptoms, anal manometry and endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) in women who followed the recommended mode of subsequent delivery following index obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) using our unit’s standardised protocol. Our secondary objectives were to evaluate the role of internal anal sphincter defects and also to compare outcomes in a subgroup of symptomatic women with normal anorectal physiology.

Methods

This is a prospective follow-up study of pregnant women with previous OASIs who were counselled regarding subsequent mode of delivery between January 2003 and December 2014. Assessment involved the St Mark’s Incontinence Score (SMIS), anal manometry and EAUS at both antepartum and 3-month postpartum visits. Data were analysed using Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney U tests.

Results

Three hundred and fifty women attended the perineal clinic over the study period, of whom 122 met the inclusion criteria (99 vaginal delivery [VD], 23 caesarean section). No significant worsening of anorectal symptoms was observed following subsequent delivery in the VD group (p = 0.896), although a reduced squeeze pressure was observed at 3 months postpartum (p < 0.001). There were no new defects on EAUS in either group.

Conclusions

This study showed no significant worsening of bowel symptoms and sphincter integrity apart from lower squeeze pressures at 3 months postpartum in the VD group when our standardised protocol was used to recommend subsequent mode of delivery. In the absence of a randomised study, use of this protocol can aid clinicians in their decision-making.

Overdiagnosis and rising rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): time for reappraisal

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) using three-dimensional (3D) endoanal ultrasound (EA-US) and to compare symptoms and anal manometry measurements between women with anal sphincters adequately repaired and those with persistent anal sphincter defects.

METHODS

The EA-US images of women with clinically diagnosed and repaired OASIS, defined as third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, who attended the perineal clinic at Croydon University Hospital over a 10-year period (2003-2013) were reanalyzed by a single expert blind to symptoms and the results of clinical examination. St Mark's Incontinence Scores (SMIS) and anal manometry measurements were obtained and compared between women with an intact anal sphincter and those with an anal sphincter scar and between those with an intact anal sphincter and those with a defect. Anal manometry measurements were compared between women with an external anal sphincter (EAS) defect and those with an internal anal sphincter (IAS) defect.

RESULTS

The images of 908 women were reanalyzed. No evidence of OASIS was found in 64 (7.0%) women, an EAS scar alone was detected in 520 (57.3%) and an anal sphincter defect in 324 (35.7%). Of the 324 women with a defect, 112 had an EAS defect, 90 had an IAS defect and 122 had a combined IAS and EAS defect. SMIS results were significantly higher in women with an anal sphincter defect compared with those with no evidence of OASIS (P = 0.018), but there was no significant difference in scores between women with an intact sphincter and those with an EAS scar only. Women with a defect had a significantly lower maximum resting pressure (median (range), 44 (8-106) vs 55 (29-86) mmHg; P < 0.001) and maximum squeeze pressure (median (range), 74 (23-180) vs 103 (44-185) mmHg; P < 0.001) compared with those in the intact group. Similar, but less marked, differences were observed in women with an EAS scar compared with those who had an intact anal sphincter. The anal length was significantly shorter in women with a defect compared with those in the intact group (median (range), 20 (10-40) vs 25 (10-40) mm; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Seven percent of women with a clinical diagnosis of OASIS were wrongly diagnosed. We believe that this rate may differ from that of other units but training methods and competency assessment tools for the diagnosis and repair of OASIS need urgent reappraisal. The role of EA-US in the immediate postpartum period needs further evaluation as the accurate interpretation of the images is dependent on the expertise of the staff involved. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Perineal body stretch during labor does not predict perineal laceration, postpartum incontinence, or postpartum sexual function: a cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The perineum stretches naturally during obstetrical labor, but it is unknown whether this stretch has a negative impact on pelvic floor outcomes after a vaginal birth (VB). We aimed to evaluate whether perineal stretch was associated with postpartum pelvic floor dysfunction, and we hypothesized that greater perineal stretch would correlate with worsened outcomes.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of primiparous women who had a VB. Perineal body (PB) length was measured antepartum, during labor, and 6 months postpartum. We determined the maximum PB (PBmax) measurements during the second stage of labor and PB change (ΔPB) between time points. Women completed functional questionnaires and had a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system exam 6 months postpartum. We analyzed the relationship of PB measurements to perineal lacerations and postpartum outcomes, including urinary, anal, and fecal incontinence, sexual activity and function, and POP-Q measurements.

RESULTS

Four hundred and forty-eight women with VB and a mean age of 24 ± 5.0 years with rare (5 %) third- or fourth-degree lacerations were assessed. During the second stage of labor, 270/448 (60 %) had perineal measurements. Mean antepartum PB length was 3.7 ± 0.8 cm, with a maximum mean PB length (PBmax) during the second stage of 6.1 ± 1.5 cm, an increase of 65 %. The change in PB length (ΔPB) from antepartum to 6 months postpartum was a net decrease (-0.39 ± 1.02 cm). PB change and PBmax were not associated with perineal lacerations or outcomes postpartum (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PB stretch during labor is unrelated to perineal laceration, postpartum incontinence, sexual activity, or sexual function.

The Evaluation of Digital Rectal Examination for Assessment of Anal Tone in Suspected Cauda Equina Syndrome

STUDY DESIGN

Seventy-five doctors completed a questionnaire documenting their grade, specialty, and experience in performing digital rectal examination (DRE). A model anus, using a pressure transducer surrounding an artificial canal, was assembled and calibrated. Participants performed 4 DREs on the model (with a break between attempts) and predicted tone as "reduced" or "normal" (35 and 60 mm Hg, respectively), followed by a "squeeze" test. Thirty health care assistants partook as a control group with no training in DRE.

OBJECTIVE

Our main objective was to investigate the validity of digital rectal examination (DRE) for assessment of anal tone.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cauda equina syndrome represents the constellation of symptoms and signs resulting from compression of lumbrosacral nerve routes. Combined with subjective neurological findings, a reduction in anal tone is an important sign, deeming further imaging necessary. DRE is an invasive procedure used to assess anal tone despite debated accuracy.

METHODS

A total of 75 doctors from various specialties were asked to fill in a questionnaire detailing their grade, age, and area of expertise. In addition, information was gathered with regard to prior training in performing DRE to assess anal tone and the importance placed on any findings. Thirty hospital health care assistants (HCAs) were used as a control group. HCAs were selected as a control group because they receive no training on the technique and would never be required to perform it in their clinical practice. A model anus was assembled using a modified pediatric sphygmomanometer cuff to act as a sphincter. The cuff could be inflated to simulate a full range of anal tone. The cuff was incorporated into an artificial anal canal, which was, in turn, placed into a model buttock created from plaster of Paris. The apparatus was calibrated across a range of pressures.

RESULTS

In each attempt, 60%, 61%, 63%, and 67% of doctors correctly identified the anal tone, respectively (average accuracy: 64%). HCAs had an identical average accuracy of 64%. All participants (100%) were able to correctly identify the squeeze test. For doctors, no correlation was found between confidence in assessing anal tone using DRE and a correct result. Seventy-one percent had received previous training in DRE, with 64% of these taught how to assess anal tone. Forty-three percent of doctors thought that further training would be beneficial.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that accuracy in assessing anal tone using DRE is limited, with overall correctness of 64%. Poor correlation exists between perceived level of skill and study result. Doctors were not significantly more able than HCAs to detect correct tone. Therefore, DRE for the assessment of anal tone is not a wholly accurate tool. A squeeze test may be of greater value if interpreted correctly.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are common and may greatly affect a patient's quality of life. There is very little information regarding optimum management in future pregnancies. Based upon anecdotal experience, this study describes the recommendations of a cohort of consultant obstetricians in the UK, in this clinical situation. There is limited adherence to the available national guidelines due to the absence of available equipment and expertise to perform endo-anal ultrasound and manometry. Elective episiotomy is still recommended by a small number of obstetricians but the majority of patients are routinely followed-up. Caesarean section is only advised for asymptomatic patients with a previous stage 4 tear, and for any symptomatic patient with a previous stage 3 or 4 tear, irrespective of subgrade. A request for elective caesarean section is likely to be granted, irrespective of OASIS grade. The use of postpartum endo-anal ultrasound would help identify those women in whom a further vaginal delivery is unlikely to exacerbate any symptoms of faecal incontinence.