Long-term follow-up after colpocleisis: regret, bowel, and bladder function

The "Repeat Colpocleisis": A Literature Review and Case Report

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Colpocleisis is a surgical procedure intended to treat pelvic organ prolapse. Compared with other modes of pelvic reconstructive surgery, colpocleisis is associated with lower morbidity and higher satisfaction, and has a success rate of 91-100% and a reoperation rate of less than 2%. However, there is limited information on how to treat recurrent prolapse after colpocleisis.

METHODS

We performed a review of the existing literature regarding colpocleisis failure and retreatment. A total of 118 articles were reviewed, with 16 articles suitable for inclusion. We also describe a case from our own institution of a "repeat colpocleisis" for recurrent prolapse after previous colpocleisis.

RESULTS

"Repeat colpocleisis" was the most common surgical technique used (18 out of 24 patients, 75.0%). The median follow-up time after the repeat surgery was 12 months, with only 1 patient with recurrence reported owing to recurrent rectocele 2 years after surgery, treated successfully with perineorrhaphy. Other less common techniques included perineorrhaphy, reversal of colpocleisis with native tissue repair, and vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal repair. Our case report describes the surgical management of a patient who had previously undergone LeFort colpocleisis with recurrence of prolapse, subsequently undergoing repeat colpocleisis.

CONCLUSIONS

The colpocleisis failure, though rare, presents a surgical challenge owing to both its rarity and the paucity of information in the literature regarding the optimal mode of management. In this review, the most common technique for surgical management of colpocleisis failure was repeat colpocleisis, with good short-term success rates noted. Additional studies with longer-term follow-up are needed.

Changes in bowel symptoms after different pelvic organ prolapse surgeries among elderly women at the 1-year follow up

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence of bowel symptoms in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP), to evaluate the changes in bowel symptoms after different POP surgeries, and to identify risk factors for unrelieved bowel symptoms.

METHODS

This was an observational prospective cohort study conducted at Peking University First Hospital from 2020 to 2021. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were collected. Participants underwent POP Quantification examination and completed the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 questionnaire at baseline and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The prevalence of bowel symptoms and bothersome bowel symptoms in women with POP was 46.38% and 24.40%, respectively. Surgical correction of prolapse was associated with significant relief in bowel symptoms (P < 0.05). Colpocleisis may relieve bowel symptoms better than reconstructive surgeries (41% vs. 31%, P = 0.048). However, 35% of women had at least one bowel symptom at the 1-year follow up. A long perineal body (Pb) and levator ani muscle injury were found to be predictors of unrelieved bowel symptoms in patients undergoing colpocleisis and those undergoing reconstructive surgery, respectively (odds ratio [OR] 2.306, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.112-4.783, P = 0.025 and OR 3.245, 95% CI 1.266-8.317, P = 0.014, respectively), and perineoplasty was a protective factor for women who underwent colpocleisis (OR 0.102, 95% CI 0.025-0.417, P = 0.001) CONCLUSION: Women with POP have a high prevalence of bowel symptoms. Although bowel symptoms can be relieved after POP surgeries, one-third of women still experience bowel symptoms. A long Pb and levator ani muscle injury were associated with unrelieved bowel symptoms, while perineoplasty was a protective factor.

Colpocleisis: reoperation risk and risk of uterine and vaginal cancer: A nationwide cohort study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We aimed to evaluate the risk of reoperation and uterine (myometrial, endometrial, and cervical) and vaginal cancer after colpocleisis performed during the years 1977-2018. Furthermore, we also aimed to assess the development in colpocleisis procedures performed during the study period.

METHODS

Danish nationwide registers covering operations, diagnoses, and life events can be linked on an individual level owing to the unique personal numbers of all Danish residents. We performed a nationwide historical cohort study including women born before year 2000 who underwent colpocleisis between 1977 and 2018 (N = 2,228) using the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). We followed the cohort until death/emigration/31 December 2018, whichever came first. Primary outcomes were number of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) operations performed after colpocleisis and uterine and vaginal cancer diagnosed after colpocleisis in a subgroup of women with the uterus in situ. This was assessed with cumulative incidences.

RESULTS

During follow-up (median 5.6 years) 6.5% and 8.2% underwent POP surgery within 2 and 10 years after colpocleisis respectively. Within 10 years after colpocleisis 0.5% (N = 8) were diagnosed with uterine or vaginal cancer in the subgroup of women with their uterus (N = 1,970). During the study time 37-80 women underwent colpocleisis yearly and the mean age increased (77.1 to 81.4 years).

CONCLUSION

Despite smaller studies showing no recurrence after colpocleisis, we found that 6.5% underwent reoperation within 2 years. Few women were diagnosed with uterine or vaginal cancer after colpocleisis. The increased age at the time of colpocleisis indicates changed attitudes regarding surgical treatment for elderly women with comorbidities.

How does colpocleisis for pelvic organ prolapse in older women affect quality of life, body image, and sexuality? A critical review of the literature

Colpocleisis is a surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse that results in vaginal obliteration. This review aims to systematically evaluate the quality of life, changes in body image, regret, and impact on sexual activity in women after colpocleisis. A review was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases with search criteria specifying pelvic organ prolapse, colpocleisis, quality of life, body image, regret, sexuality, and their synonyms. For the selection of the eligible articles, we used the PRISMA reporting system. A total of 1285 articles were found. After removing duplicates and applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 30 articles were reviewed in full length. Quality of life after colpocleisis was evaluated in 22 articles, and 20 authors used validated questionnaires. All concluded that quality of life improved after surgical treatment. Twenty-one articles studied regret after obliterative treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Most of the patients reported no regret. Regret was often due to bowel and bladder symptoms. A few patients reported regret because of loss of coital function. Body image was highlighted in six studies. Three articles assessed body image using the modified Body Image scale. The body image scores demonstrated a significant improvement after surgery. Women tended to remain sexually active and some also regained sexual activities after surgery. Colpocleisis remains a viable option for pelvic organ prolapse, without compromising quality of life, body image, or sexuality, but diligent patient selection is needed. Particular concern should be given to bladder and bowel symptoms since these are the main reason for dissatisfaction after colpocleisis.

Sexually Inactive Status in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Before Colpocleisis and Postoperative Satisfaction and Regret Rate

PURPOSE

The aim of the study was to investigate the sexually inactive status of patients with pelvic organ prolapse before colpocleisis and postoperative satisfaction and regret rate.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with pelvic organ prolapse who underwent colpocleisis was conducted in our hospital from January 2007 to April 2019. Records were reviewed before surgery for general clinical characteristics, duration, and reasons for being sexually inactive. Follow-up was conducted by telephone about patient satisfaction, Patient Global Impression of Improvement score, and regret rate after surgery.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 247 patients was 73.8 ± 5.58 years. A total of 76.9% (190/247) described the duration of being sexually inactive, and the mean time was 12.6 ± 8.69 years. The 247 patients gave the following reasons for being sexually inactive: 52.2% (129/247) were widowed and 37.2% (92/247) reported the physical health factors of their spouses or sexual partners. The first male factor was nervous system disease (37.0%, 34/92). A total of 5.3% (13/247) were patient-related factors and 5.3% (13/247) were factors of both the male and female. A total of 195 patients underwent follow-up, the rate was 78.9% (195/247), and the follow-up time was 39.7 ± 37.5 (2-140) months. A total of 98.5% (192/195) of patients were very satisfied. A total of 98.9% (193/195) of patients were very much improved or improved in Patient Global Impression of Improvement score. A total of 1.02% (2/195) of patients regretted having colpocleisis nearly 2 years later.

CONCLUSIONS

The main reason for being sexually inactive was having been widowed. Colpocleisis was associated with high satisfaction rates and low regret rate.

Colpocleisis as an obliterative surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: is it still a viable option in the twenty-first century? Narrative review

Introduction and hypothesis

The aims were to review the literature from the last two decades and analyze treatment efficacy and findings of the studies on colpocleisis.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted within the MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, using the following keywords: pelvic organ prolapse (POP), colpocleisis, obliterative, and LeFort. All English full-text prospective and retrospective observational and interventional studies were included. Anatomical and subjective success, surgical techniques, concomitant procedures, complication rates, anesthesia methods, and decision regret were analyzed.

Results

A total of 237 papers were identified and 49 met the inclusion criteria. Mean patient age was 69.0 ± 8.0 to 84 ± 3.1. Over 90.2% of patients undergoing colpocleisis were diagnosed with POP stage ≥ 3. The follow-up ranged from 30 days to a median of 5 years. Anatomical success, defined as POP-Q stage ≤ 1 and no prolapse beyond the hymen, was achieved in 62.5 to 100% and 87.5 to 100% of all patients respectively. Subjective success ranged from 88% to 100%. Regret over the loss of coital ability ranged from 0% in many studies to 12.9%, general decision regret from 0% to 13.8%. After concomitant midurethral sling surgery, 86.8% to 94% of all patients were continent, with a 0–14% sling revision rate due to urinary retention. Urinary tract infection was the most common postoperative complication (4.3 to 9% confirmed with urine culture, 34.7% based on symptom definition). Bowel (0 to 2.7%) and urinary tract (0 to 9.1%) injuries were the consequences of concomitant procedures. The mortality rates were up to 1.3%.

Conclusions

Colpocleisis is a heterogeneous procedure, characterized by high subjective and objective success, low coital ability regret, and a low risk of complications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00192-021-04907-7

Le Fort colpocleisis: An evaluation of results and quality of life at intermediate-term follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To assess postoperative complications, intermediate-term anatomic and subjective success rates, and quality of life following obliterative Le Fort colpocleisis (LFC) for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 53 subjects who underwent LFC surgery between January 2012 and April 2019. Demographic and treatment data were retrieved from a hospital database. Data on postoperative anatomic results were gathered from individual examinations of study subjects. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to evaluate the complications. The Prolapse-Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire was administered in person or over the telephone before and after the operation. Low scores on the P-QoL reflect a high quality of life.

RESULTS

The mean age at operation was 73 ± 7.1 years. The mean time between LFC and the postoperative questionnaire and interview was 30.8 ± 15.7 months (range: 12-82). Ninety-two percent of subjects had at least one comorbidity. When subjects were classified using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) Quantification System, seven (13.2 %) had Stage 3 POP and 46 (86.8 %) had Stage 4 POP. The overall rate of minor peri-operative complications rate was 11.3 % (six subjects). The objective success rate of LFC at intermediate-term follow-up was 98.1 %, and the subjective success rate was 96.2 %. The mean time between LFC and the postoperative questionnaire and interview was 30.8 ± 15.7 months (range: 12-82). There was a statistically significant decrease in the postoperative P-QoL score (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on positive intermediate-term anatomic and subjective outcomes, including a significant decrease in P-QoL questionnaire scores and a lack of regret, obliterative LFC should be considered a first-choice procedure for elderly and sexually inactive women with advanced POP.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes, Recurrence, Satisfaction, and Regret After Total Colpocleisis With Concomitant Vaginal Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Supplemental digital content is available in the text.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate long-term study outcomes of colpocleisis along with concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in elderly women with advanced POP who underwent total colpocleisis with or without hysterectomy from 2012 to 2017.

Results

A total of 242 elderly women were included in this study, of which 172 underwent total colpocleisis along with concomitant vaginal hysterectomy (CH group) and 70 underwent partial colpocleisis-retained uterus (LeFort group). More than one comorbidity was observed among 154 (85.9%) patients in the CH group and 56 (81.4%) patients in the LeFort group. The difference between 2 groups (CH and LeFort) in mean length of hospital staying, mean day of removing urinary catheter, mean day of farting time after operation, and postoperative complications was not statistically significant. In total colpocleisis along with hysterectomy group, a case (0.6%) of early asymptomatic endometrial cancer was diagnosed unexpectedly by pathology after hysterectomy. Median follow-up was 43.0 (19.0–85.0) months in the CH group and 45.0 (26.0–79.0) months in the LeFort group. Only one patient reported recurrence. Subjective satisfaction rate was 98.8% (CH group) versus 98.6% (LeFort group). Regret rate was 0.58% (CH group) versus 0% (LeFort group). No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

Both colpocleisis along with hysterectomy and partial colpocleisis-retained uterus are safe, with fewer complications and high long-term satisfaction. Colpocleisis along with hysterectomy is more conducive to discovery of early asymptomatic malignant tumors of the uterus, which is a suitable alternative for elderly frail women with severe POP.

Long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction of Le Fort colpocleisis for the treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to investigate the long-term efficacy and patient satisfaction of Le Fort colpocleisis for the treatment of severe pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent Le Fort colpocleisis from January 2007 to August 2018 in our hospital. Follow-up was conducted via outpatient visits or the telephone. Records were reviewed for anatomical recurrence, complications, urinary and intestinal symptoms post-operation, reoperation rate, patient satisfaction, Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score, regret rate etc. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients underwent follow-up. The follow-up time was 60.7 ± 34.18 (12-140) months. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperative urinary retention occurred in 3.8% of patients (8 out of 208). There was no anatomical recurrence. New or more severe urinary symptoms occurred in 8.7% of patients (18 out of 208); new or more severe intestinal symptoms occurred in 1.9% of patients (4 out of 208). The reoperation rate was 1.44% (3 out of 208). Three cases of reoperation occurred for the following reasons: a case of severe stress urinary incontinence, a case of abscess in the vaginal septum, and a case of uterine malignancy after 2 years of colpocleisis. Patient satisfaction was as follows: 98.6% (205 out of 208) of patients were very satisfied. The PGI-I score was very much improved or improved in 99.5% (207 out of 208) of patients. A total of 0.96% (2 out of 208) of patients regretted undergoing colpocleisis.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term follow-up results showed that Le Fort colpocleisis was a safe and effective surgical procedure associated with high satisfaction. There was a very low regret rate, but the procedure should be taken seriously.

Update in native tissue vaginal vault prolapse repair

The lifetime risk of women for undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is estimated to be 11-19%, and 30% of these women will require subsequent reoperation over time. Following hysterectomy, 3.6 per 1,000 person-years need surgical correction of prolapse, and in two-thirds of these cases multi-compartment prolapse is present. In the last decades, vaginally synthetic meshes were widely used in pelvic reconstructive surgery. However, after the decision of the Food and Drug Administration in 2019 to stop selling all surgical mesh devices for transvaginal prolapse repair, native tissue (NT) vaginal repair seems to regain an important role in pelvic reconstructive surgery. In the literature, various surgical techniques have been described for apical repair, but the best surgical approach is still to be proven. This paper analyzes the current evidence from recent literature on NT vaginal vault prolapse (VVP) repair, with special focus on the safety and efficacy of the various vaginal techniques.

Razor-type dermatomes enable quick and thin vaginal dissection with less bleeding in colpocleisis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Although colpocleisis is a low-invasive surgical option to treat pelvic organ prolapse, it sometimes involves a long operative time with substantial bleeding. To streamline the vaginal dissection process in colpoclesis, we introduced the usage of dermatomes.

METHODS

All patients were sexually inactive women with post-hysterectomy prolapse. Data of the dermatome group were retrospectively compared with those of the historical control group based on operative features, perioperative complications and pathology of dissected tissue. In the dermatome group, 34 women underwent total colpocleisis with vaginal dissection using dermatomes; 4 were done mainly with electric dermatomes, and 30 were done with razor-type dermatomes. In the control group, 20 women underwent total colpocleisis with vaginal dissection using Metzenbaum scissors.

RESULTS

Using dermatomes in vaginal dissection was helpful to shorten total operative time (including perineoplasty) by one third from 76 to 51 min, to shorten the time of colpocleisis by half, from 62 to 32 min, and to reduce intraoperative bleeding by 76%, from 62 to 15 ml. In addition, none in the dermatome group and 2/20 patients in the control group had unintended peritoneal opening. Dissection with scissors removed not only the epithelium and submucosal layer but also the muscle layer. This was minimized with razor-type dermatomes and never occurred with electric dermatomes. Whereas electric dermatomes are difficult to get accustomed to and are expensive, razor-type dermatomes enable thinner dissection compared with scissors, are easy to handle and are inexpensive.

CONCLUSIONS

Razor-type dermatomes enable quick and thin vaginal dissection with less bleeding. Therefore, they can be recommended as a practical tool for colpocleisis, a prolapse operation mainly for frail elderly patients.

Clinical application and mid-term results of modified vaginal closure: pelvic symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction, and regret rate

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a modified vaginal closure in older women with severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with respect to symptoms, quality of life, postoperative satisfaction, regret rate, and complications METHODS:: From March, 2014 to December, 2016, in all, 32 women were enrolled in the study. All the participants underwent a modified vaginal closure. Records were reviewed to collect demographic characteristics and perioperative parameters. The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-short form 20 (PFDI-20) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Profile (SF-36) were used to evaluate pelvic symptoms and self-perceived quality of life, respectively, 6 months postoperatively and at the latest follow-up. The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was used to estimate the satisfaction. The satisfaction and regret rates were assessed at the latest follow-up.

RESULTS

After an average follow-up period of 23 months (range 8-41 months), none of the 32 women experienced recurrence of prolapse that required reoperation. During follow-up, significant improvements were observed in the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI-6), Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6), and SF-36 results (P < 0.001). However, the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI-8) results did not improve significantly (P = 0.074). None of the participants regretted undergoing this procedure, and the PGI-C indicated a satisfaction rate of 93.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified vaginal closure showed a positive impact on POP and urinary symptoms, and consequently improved quality of life of the 32 participants. This procedure achieved a relatively high satisfaction rate and a low regret rate.

Colpocleisis: A Survey of Current Practice Patterns

BACKGROUND

Currently, there are no standard treatment guidelines for colpocleisis. Clinical practice varies widely for this safe and effective procedure.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the current practice patterns in the United States among surgeons who perform colpocleisis.

METHODS

A 27-item anonymous Web-based survey was sent to all practicing physicians affiliated with the American Urogynecologic Society. It consisted of questions regarding the demographic background of the physicians and their current practice as it relates to colpocleisis.

RESULTS

Of the 1422 physicians contacted, 322 responded (23%) to the questionnaire. Slightly more than half were female with an average time of 15 years in practice. The majority of respondents (79%) were urogynecologists. Most surgeons chose colpocleisis for its high success rate, short operating time, and low risk of complications. Approximately half of the providers performed both LeFort and total colpocleisis. Only 18% performed a routine hysterectomy at the time of surgery. Routine preoperative endometrial evaluation was preferred by 68% of the respondents, with 81% utilizing a transvaginal ultrasound first. Almost all providers would perform concomitant incontinence procedures, with 54% requiring a positive cough stress test and normal postvoid residual.

CONCLUSIONS

There is variation in the current practice of colpocleisis in the United States. LeFort colpocleisis is most commonly performed, and routine hysterectomy is uncommon. Two thirds of surgeons evaluate the endometrium prior to surgery. Concomitant anti-incontinence procedures appear to be standard.

Regret in Surgical Decision Making: A Systematic Review of Patient and Physician Perspectives

OBJECTIVE

Regret is a powerful motivating factor in medical decision making among patients and surgeons. Regret can be particularly important for surgical decisions, which often carry significant risk and may have uncertain outcomes. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on patient and physician regret in the surgical setting.

METHODS

A search of the English literature between 1986 and 2016 that examined patient and physician self-reported decisional regret was carried out using the MEDLINE/PubMed and Web of Science databases. Clinical studies performed in patients and physicians participating in elective surgical treatment were included.

RESULTS

Of 889 studies identified, 73 patient studies and 6 physician studies met inclusion criteria. Among the 73 patient studies, 57.5% examined patients with a cancer diagnosis, with breast (26.0%) and prostate (28.8%) cancers being most common. Interestingly, self-reported patient regret was relatively uncommon with an average prevalence across studies of 14.4%. Factors most often associated with regret included type of surgery, disease-specific quality of life, and shared decision making. Only 6 studies were identified that focused on physician regret; 2 pertained to surgical decision making. These studies primarily measured regret of omission and commission using hypothetical case scenarios and used the results to develop decision curve analysis tools.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported decisional regret was present in about 1 in 7 surgical patients. Factors associated with regret were both patient- and procedure related. While most studies focused on patient regret, little data exist on how physician regret affects shared decision making.

Consensus Statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the Use of Implanted Materials for Treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence

CONTEXT

Surgical nonautologous meshes have been used for several decades to repair abdominal wall herniae. Implantable materials have been adopted for the treatment of female and male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and female pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

OBJECTIVE

A consensus review of existing data based on published meta-analyses and reviews.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This document summarises the deliberations of a consensus group meeting convened by the European Association of Urology (EAU) and the European Urogynecological Association, to explore the current evidence relating to the use of polypropylene (PP) materials used for the treatment of SUI and POP, with reference to the 2016 EAU guidelines (European Association of Urology 2016), the European Commission's SCENIHR report on the use of surgical meshes (SCENIHR 2015), other available high-quality evidence, guidelines, and national recommendations.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Current data suggest that the use of nonautologous durable materials in surgery has well-established benefits but significant risks, which are specific to the condition and location they are used for. Various graft-related complications have been described-such as infection, chronic pain including dyspareunia, exposure in the vagina, shrinkage, erosion into other organs of xenografts, synthetic PP tapes (used in SUI), and meshes (used in POP)-which differ from the complications seen with abdominal herniae.

CONCLUSIONS

When considering surgery for SUI, it is essential to evaluate the available options, which may include synthetic midurethral slings (MUSs) using PP tapes, bulking agents, colposuspension, and autologous sling surgery. The use of synthetic MUSs for surgical treatment of SUI in both male and female patients has good efficacy and acceptable morbidity. Synthetic mesh for POP should be used only in complex cases with recurrent prolapse in the same compartment and restricted to those surgeons with appropriate training who are working in multidisciplinary referral centres.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Synthetic slings can be safely used in the surgical treatment of stress incontinence in both male and female patients. Patients need to be aware of the alternative therapy and potential risks and complications of this therapy. Synthetic mesh for treating prolapse should be used only in complex cases with recurrent prolapse in specialist referral centres.

Diagnosis and Therapy of Female Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Guideline of the DGGG, SGGG and OEGGG (S2e-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/006, April 2016)

Aims: The aim was to establish an official interdisciplinary guideline, published and coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG). The guideline was developed for use in German-speaking countries. In addition to the Germany Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, the guideline has also been approved by the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG) and the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG). This is a guideline published and coordinated by the DGGG. The aim is to provide evidence-based recommendations obtained by evaluating the relevant literature for the diagnostic, conservative and surgical treatment of women with female pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress incontinence. Methods: We conducted a systematic review together with a synthesis of data and meta-analyses, where feasible. MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahl, Pedro and the Cochrane Register were searched for relevant articles. Reference lists were hand-searched, as were the abstracts of the Annual Meetings of the International Continence Society and the International Urogynecological Association. We included only abstracts of randomized controlled trials that were presented and discussed in podium sessions. We assessed original data on surgical procedures published since 2008 with a minimum follow-up time of at least 12 months. If the studies included descriptions of perioperative complications, this minimum follow-up period did not apply. Recommendations: The guideline encompasses recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse. Recommendations for anterior, posterior and apical pelvic organ prolapse with or without concomitant stress urinary incontinence, uterine preservation options, and the pros and cons of mesh placements during surgery for pelvic organ prolapse are presented. The recommendations are based on an extensive and systematic review and evaluation of the current literature and include the experiences and specific conditions in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

Obliterative Surgery for the Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Patient Survey on Reasons for Surgery Selection and Postoperative Decision Regret and Satisfaction

OBJECTIVES

To identify patient-reported reasons for selecting obliterative surgery for the purpose of predicting decision regret and satisfaction.

METHODS

We created a deidentified database of patients who underwent an obliterative procedure for prolapse from 2006 to 2013. Patients were excluded if they declined study participation, were deceased, or had dementia. Participants completed a survey regarding reasons for selecting obliterative surgery and a modified version of validated questionnaires on decision regret (Decision Regret Scale-Pelvic Floor Disorder) and satisfaction (Satisfaction with Decision Scale-Pelvic Floor Disorder). Parsimonious multivariate linear regression models were constructed to determine if any of the reasons given for choosing obliterative surgery were independent predictors of decision regret and satisfaction after controlling for significant sociodemographic, clinical, and surgical outcome data identified by bivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven women completed the surveys. "To follow my doctor's recommendations" and "no longer sexually active," and/or "did not plan to be" as reasons for selecting obliterative surgery made the most difference; however, these reasons were not identified as independent predictors of decision regret or satisfaction after controlling for confounders. The regret linear regression models identified preoperative sexual activity rather than the patient-reported reason "no longer sexually active and/or did not plan to be," as the only independent predictor of more decision regret after obliterative surgery (B coefficient 1.68, P < 0.01). The satisfaction linear regression models identified reoperation for any reason as an independent predictor of lower satisfaction (β, -0.24; P = 0.04) and the patient-reported reason for choosing obliterative surgery "not interested in pessary" as a predictor of higher satisfaction (β, 0.30, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study advances our knowledge about the obliterative surgical decision making process. Behavioral and educational interventions directed at improving patient and physician communications concerning the dynamics of sexual health issues in an aging population will likely decrease regret when obliterative surgery is chosen. Minimizing reoperation after obliterative surgery through increased experience, knowledge, and improved surgical skills and patient validation when pessary is declined will likely improve satisfaction when obliterative surgery is chosen.

Long-term quality of life, satisfaction, pelvic floor symptoms and regret after colpocleisis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to present long-term results including patients' satisfaction, pelvic floor symptoms, regret and change in body image in a long-term follow-up after colpocleisis.

METHODS

All women who underwent colpocleisis between September 2001 and February 2014 were identified from the hospital operating lists. These women were contacted for a telephone survey up to 13 years after surgery and asked to complete a structured questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction, Quality of Life (QoL) and pelvic floor symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 44 women underwent colpocleisis during the period from September 2001 to February 2014. Mean age was 78 years (range 65-91) years. Mean follow-up time was 41 months (range 10-120). Twenty women could be reached for the survey and were included in the analysis. 15 (75 %) reported a positive impact on QoL, 2 (10 %) a negative because of urinary problems, 2 (10 %) could not report any change in the QoL and 1 (5 %) could not answer this question. There was no recurrence of prolapse. The majority of patients (90 %) would undergo the same surgery again and no patient regretted the loss of her vaginal sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

Colpocleisis seems to be an effective treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. In the long term, impact on quality of life is positive, whilst urinary tract symptoms seem to be the most bothersome factor.

Total colpocleisis: technical considerations

INTRODUCTION

We present a video describing the technical considerations for performing a total colpocleisis in the management of symptomatic post-hysterectomy pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

A 76-year old female presented with pelvic pressure and the presence of a palpable vaginal bulge. She had significant bother and had previously failed use of a pessary. She wasnot sexually active, with no plans for future sexual activity. Her medical history was significant for coronary artery disease with prior myocardial infarction. She had high-grade vaginal vault prolapse, without occult incontinence. After discussing observation, pessaries, restorative and obliterative procedures, she elected to undergo colpocleisis. Following hydrodissection with lidocaine with epinephrine, a quadrant-based dissection was performed to remove the vaginal epithelium circumferentially. Following this, serial purse string sutures were used to reduce the prolapse, with meticulous hemostasis. The vaginal epithelium was then closed transversely. Next, a perineorrhaphy was performed. The midline was plicated and the perineal body reconstructed.

RESULTS

The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative course. At six-week follow-up she had no evidence of recurrent prolapse and was voiding without difficulty.

CONCLUSIONS

Colpocleisis can provide excellent anatomic and subjective outcomes. Our goal is to highlight pertinent technical considerations in order to optimize patient outcomes.

Apical prolapse repair: weighing the risks and benefits

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the current literature regarding surgical repair of vaginal apical prolapse and discusses the risks and benefits of various surgical approaches.

RECENT FINDINGS

Vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension has similar anatomic and subjective outcomes to sacrospinous ligament fixation at 1 year. Native tissue vaginal repairs offer decreased morbidity compared with mesh-augmented sacrocolpopexy; however, sacrocolpopexy has greater anatomic success. Minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy appears to be equivalent to open abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Native tissue repairs and transvaginal mesh kits support the vaginal apex with similar results; however, long-term follow-up is needed. Robotic and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy are equally effective in restoring the vaginal apex.

SUMMARY

Surgical restoration of the vaginal apex can be accomplished via a variety of approaches and techniques. When deciding on the proper surgical intervention, the surgeon must carefully calculate the risks and benefits of each procedure while incorporating the patient's individual medical and surgical risk factors. Lastly, a discussion regarding the patient's overall goals of care is paramount to the decision-making process.

Heterogeneity in post-intervention prolapse and urinary outcome reporting: a one-year review of the International Urogynecology Journal

INTRODUCTION

This review aimed to examine post-intervention prolapse, incontinence, and overactive bladder outcome measures published in the International Urogynecology Journal over the previous year and to report on the heterogeneity in outcome reporting.

METHODS

All original article abstracts published in the print version of the International Urogynecology Journal in 2014 were reviewed for possible inclusion. Those reporting on prolapse and/or incontinence and/or overactive bladder outcomes following a urogynecological intervention were analyzed. Articles were reviewed for all reported outcomes. Outcomes were categorized as primary or secondary and objective or subjective.

RESULTS

Of 117 original articles published, 45 were reviewed. Among primary outcomes, 9 different outcomes were reported for prolapse and 11 for incontinence and overactive bladder. For prolapse, 6 different objective and 13 subjective outcomes were reported. For incontinence, 21 objective and 36 subjective outcomes were reported. Three different definitions were used for the outcome of "prolapse cure," 3 for "prolapse recurrence," and 4 for "stress incontinence cure." Several validated and non-validated questionnaires in addition to single unvalidated questions were used to measure subjective outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This research highlights the diversity in outcome reporting for prolapse, incontinence, and overactive bladder after an intervention in the last year of publications alone. This can lead to serious challenges in the generation of higher order evidence, such as systematic reviews and meta-analyses. As a subspecialty, we need to aim for more cohesive reporting so as to allow for robust comparison and evidence dissemination.