Factors associated with fecal incontinence in a nationally representative sample of diabetic women

Prevalence of depression and anxiety in women with pelvic floor dysfunctions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Female pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a common condition affecting the emotional well-being of women.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in women with PFD. SEARCH STRATEGY, SELECTION CRITERIA, DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Following prospective registration (PROSPERO CRD42022362095) we conducted a search of three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus) from inception to April 2023 without language restriction to capture studies reporting the prevalence of depression/anxiety among women with PFD (chronic pelvic pain [CPP], urinary incontinence [UI], pelvic organ prolapse [POP], and/or fecal incontinence [FI]). Only studies with validated tools were included. Data extraction and study quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers. Stratifying by type of PFD, rates of depression and anxiety were pooled using random effects model computing 95% confidence interval (CI) and assessing heterogeneity using the I2 statistic. Funnel plots were used to detect potential reporting biases and small-study effects.

MAIN RESULTS

The search yielded 767 articles, from which 54 studies containing 632 605 women were included. All the studies were high quality. The prevalence of depression was: CPP 26.8% (95% CI: 19.2-34.4, I2 = 98.7%; 12 studies, 4798 participants with 491 cases; Egger's P value = 0.009); UI 26.3% (95% CI: 19.4-33.2, I2 = 99.9%; 26 studies, a total of 346 114 participants with 25 050 cases; Egger's P value = 0.944); POP 34.9% (95% CI: 24.3-45.6, I2 = 68%; three studies, 297 participants with 104 cases; Egger's P value = 0.973); and FI 25.3% (95% CI: 0.68-49.9, I2 = 99.7%; six studies, 14 663 participants with 1773 cases; Egger's P value = 0.780). The prevalence of anxiety was: CPP 29.5% (95% CI: 16.3-42.7, I2 = 97.7%; nine studies, 2483 participants with 349 cases; Egger's P value = 0.001); UI 46.91% (95% CI: 39.1-54.6, I2 = 99.6%; 11 studies, 198 491 participants with 40 058 cases; Egger's P value = 0.337); and POP 28% (95% CI: 13.6-42.4, I2 = 89%; three studies with 355 participants with 90 cases; Egger's P value = 0.306).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of mental health illness was variable in the different types of PFDs. This meta-analysis helps quantify the burden of depression and anxiety in PFD and will help inform the policies regarding screening of emotional well-being by healthcare professionals engaged in care of women with PFD.

Exploring the association between cardiovascular health and bowel health

Chronic constipation, diarrhea, and fecal incontinence have high incidence, potential disability, and socioeconomic impact, imposing a heavy burden on the quality of life. We aim to explore the association between cardiovascular health (CVH) and bowel health from National Health and Nutrition Survey 2005-2010. CVH is assessed using Life's Essential 8 (LE8). Chronic constipation, chronic diarrhea, and fecal incontinence are assessed based on Bristol Stool Form Scale classification, bowel movements, and bowel leakage. Better health behaviors (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.94, p = 0.02) and worse health factors (OR: 1.45, CI 1.03-2.04, p = 0.04) were associated with less chronic constipation. Less chronic diarrhea is correlated with better CVH (OR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.79, p = 0.003) and health factors (OR: 0.61, CI 0.46-0.81, p = 0.001). Meanwhile, the proportion of chronic diarrhea significantly decreases when the health behaviors score exceeds 59.42. Lower fecal incontinence was associated with better health behaviors (OR: 0.63, CI 0.44-0.90, p = 0.01) CVH. Better CVH and health behaviors are both linked to lower all-cause mortality in participants with chronic constipation and chronic diarrhea. A higher health behaviors score is also associated with less all-cause mortality in patients with fecal incontinence. Maintaining CVH at the population level contributes to intestinal health, achieving the dual management of both while saving on healthcare costs. However, further prospective research is needed to confirm these associations.

Fecal incontinence was associated with depression of any severity: insights from a large cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Current studies on the association between fecal incontinence (FI) and depression are very limited, and most of them are restricted to women or elderly patients. This study aims to evaluate in detail the association between FI and depression among US adults.

METHODS

13,480 adults aged 20 years and older were selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010. Monthly loss of solid, liquid, or mucous stool was defined as FI. Clinical depression and depression severity were assessed by the validated Patient Health Questionnaide-9 (PHQ-9). Models of multivariate logistic regression were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs). A subgroup analysis was carried out to ensure that the results were stable.

RESULTS

After adjusting for covariates such as demographics, risk behaviors and associated comorbidities, the PHQ-9 score and clinical depression were both significantly associated with FI, with ORs and 95%CIs of 1.11 (1.10-1.13) and 3.01 (2.53-3.57). Depression of all severities was also significantly associated with FI. The ORs and 95%CIs of FI with mild depression, moderate depression, and moderately severe to severe depression were 2.29 (1.96-2.68), 3.44 (2.77-4.27) and 4.65 (3.61-6.00), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed no statistically significant interactions (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, FI significantly associated with depression of any severity. Like the elderly or female patients with FI, young and middle-aged or men with FI are also at high risk of depression and should also be the focus of depression screening and early intervention.

The Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is the involuntary passage or the incapacity to control the release of fecal matter through the anus. It is a condition that significantly impairs quality of life in those that suffer from it, given that it affects body image, self-esteem, and interferes with everyday activities, in turn, favoring social isolation. There are no guidelines or consensus in Mexico on the topic, and so the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología brought together a multidisciplinary group (gastroenterologists, neurogastroenterologists, and surgeons) to carry out the «Mexican consensus on fecal incontinence» and establish useful recommendations for the medical community. The present document presents the formulated recommendations in 35 statements. Fecal incontinence is known to be a frequent entity whose incidence increases as individuals age, but one that is under-recognized. The pathophysiology of incontinence is complex and multifactorial, and in most cases, there is more than one associated risk factor. Even though there is no diagnostic gold standard, the combination of tests that evaluate structure (endoanal ultrasound) and function (anorectal manometry) should be recommended in all cases. Treatment should also be multidisciplinary and general measures and drugs (lidamidine, loperamide) are recommended, as well as non-pharmacologic interventions, such as biofeedback therapy, in selected cases. Likewise, surgical treatment should be offered to selected patients and performed by experts.

Association between constipation and major depression in adult Americans: evidence from NHANES 2005-2010

Objective

Current studies on the association between constipation and depression is still insufficient. In this study, we investigated the detailed association between constipation and major depression among American adults.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 12,352 adults aged 20 and older were selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010 for the sample. Constipation was defined as fewer than three defecation frequencies per week. For the assessment of major depression, the validated Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was used. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using multivariate logistic regression models. A subgroup analysis was carried out to ensure that the results were stable.

Results

Of the 12,352 participants, 430 reported constipation, with a prevalence of 3.5%. Depression was reported in 1030 cases, indicating a prevalence rate of 8.3%. Patients with constipation were significantly more likely to have major depression (20.9%) than those without it (7.9%, p < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, education level, body mass index, vigorous physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking status, poverty income ratio, diabetes, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use, liver disease, heart disease, pulmonary disease, hypertension, arthritis, cancer, dietary fiber intake, moisture intake, total fat intake, carbohydrates intake, and protein intake, constipation is significantly associated with major depression (OR: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.68-2.87, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses by age, sex, dietary intake, risk behaviors, and common complications showed no statistically significant interactions (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study showed that constipation were significantly associated with depression. When treating patients with constipation, it is necessary for clinicians to screen and evaluate depression, and provide timely and effective intervention for patients with depression to avoid further deterioration of the condition.

Pelvic organ prolapse and anal incontinence in women: screening with a validated epidemiology survey

PURPOSE

The primary objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and anal incontinence (AI) in a Minnesota population using the Epidemiology of Prolapse and Incontinence Questionnaire (EPIQ). The secondary objective of this study was to determine the association of POP and AI with parity, age, smoking status, body mass index (BMI), and co-morbidities.

METHODS

Women ≥ 18 years old attending the 2018 Minnesota State Fair were asked to fill out a web-based version of the EPIQ. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association of POP and AI with the variables of interest.

RESULTS

A total of 1426 women were included in the analysis. There was a 4.9% prevalence of POP and 14.9% prevalence of AI. POP was significantly associated with parity and higher BMI (p < 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). In this cohort, POP was not associated with older age, smoking, or presence of co-morbid conditions. Anal incontinence was associated with older age (p < 0.01), smoking status (p = 0.01), and presence of co-morbid conditions (p = 0.01) but was not associated with parity or higher BMI.

CONCLUSION

POP and AI were associated with some, but not all, of the variables tested, which differs from prior studies. In addition, the prevalence of POP and AI were different than rates reported in similar studies. This may suggest regional differences in prevalence of POP and AI.

Administration of an Anal Bulking Agent With Polyacrylate-Polyalcohol Copolymer Particles Versus Endoanal Electrical Stimulation With Biofeedback for the Management of Mild and Moderate Anal Incontinence: A Randomized Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

There are few treatment options for mild-to-moderate anal incontinence with isolated internal anal sphincter defects or anal incontinence without muscle damage. Less-invasive techniques are generally favored.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results between the use of an anal bulking agent with polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer particles and endoanal electrical stimulation with biofeedback in patients with mild or moderate anal incontinence.

DESIGN

This was a prospective parallel-group, single-institution, randomized clinical trial.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted in an ambulatory setting at the Colorectal Physiology Service of the Hospital das Clinicas, Medical School, University of Sao Paulo.

PATIENTS

This study included patients who had anal incontinence for >6 months with isolated internal anal sphincter muscle damage or absence of anatomical defects in the anorectal sphincter complex.

INTERVENTIONS

Anal bulking agent and endoanal electrical stimulation with biofeedback.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score, and the secondary outcome measures included quality of life, recommended procedures, and anorectal manometry.

RESULTS

There were no significant between-group differences in mean age, sex, BMI, stool consistency, and Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score (p = 0.20) at baseline. After 12 months, the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score was found to be significantly improved in patients treated with the bulking agent compared to those treated with electrical stimulation (mean, 6.2 vs 9.2; p = 0.002), though the anorectal manometry parameters did not change significantly. The mean anal Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score declined by 4.2 points in the bulking agent group compared to a decline of 0.8 in the electrical stimulation group (mean difference in decline: 3.4 points; 95% CI, 1.2-5.5). Quality-of life evaluation showed similar results between groups comparing baseline parameters with 12-month follow-up.

LIMITATIONS

The short follow-up period of 1 year, atypical method of biofeedback, and unmatched baseline in some of the quality-of-life scales between the 2 groups limited this study.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mild or moderate anal incontinence, the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence Score significantly improved in the bulking agent with polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer group compared with the endoanal electrical stimulation with biofeedback group. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B938.

ADMINISTRACIN DE UN GEL ANAL CON PARTCULAS DE COPOLMERO DE POLIACRILATOPOLIALCOHOL VERSUS ESTIMULACIN ELCTRICA ENDOANAL CON EJERCICIOS ANALES BIOFEEDBACK PARA EL MANEJO DE LA INCONTINENCIA ANAL LEVE Y MODERADA UN ESTUDI PROSPECTIVO ALEATORIZADO

ANTECEDENTES:Hasta la fecha, existen pocas opciones de tratamiento para la incontinencia anal de leve a moderada con defectos aislados del esfínter anal interno o la incontinencia anal sin daño muscular. Por lo general, se prefieren técnicas menos invasivas.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue comparar los resultados entre el uso de un gel intra-anal con partículas de copolímero de poliacrilato-polialcohol y la estimulación eléctrica endoanal con ejercicios anales en pacientes con incontinencia anal leve o moderada.DISEÑO:Este fue un ensayo clínico aleatorio prospectivo de grupos paralelos, de una institución, realizado en cuatro etapas: base, procedimientos, postratamiento temprano y tardío.AJUSTE:Este estudio se realizó en el ambulatorio de Fisiología Colorrectal del Servicio de Coloproctología del Hospital das Clínicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de São Paulo.PACIENTES:Paciente con incontinencia anal con más de 6 meses, con daño muscular aislado del esfínter anal interno o ausencia de defectos anatómicos en el esfínter anorrectal.INTERVENCIONES:Las intervenciones incluyeron la inyección del gel intra-anal y estimulación eléctrica endoanal con ejercicios anales.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Indice de incontinencia fecal (Cleveland Clinic Florida), Indice de calidad de vida, los procedimientos recomendados y la manometría anorrectal.RESULTADOS:No hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en cuanto a la edad media, el sexo, el índice de masa corporal, la consistencia de las heces y la puntuación de incontinencia fecal (p = 0,20) al inicio del estudio. Después de 12 meses, la puntuación de incontinencia fecal mejoró significativamente en los pacientes tratados con el el gel intra-anal (media = 6,2) en comparación con los tratados con estimulación eléctrica (media = 9,2; p = 0,002), aunque los parámetros de manometría anorrectal no mejoraron significativamente. La puntuación anal media de incontinencia fecal disminuyó 4,2 puntos en el grupo del Gel intra-anal en comparación con 0,8 en el grupo de estimulación eléctrica (diferencia media en la disminución: 3,4 puntos; IC del 95%: 1,2 a 5,5). La evaluación de la calidad de vida mostró resultados similares entre los grupos que compararon los parámetros iniciales con un seguimiento de 12 meses.LIMITACIONES:Breve período de seguimiento de un año, métodos diferentes de ejercicios anales y línea de base sin igual en algunas de las escalas de calidad de vida entre los dos grupos.CONCLUSIONES:En pacientes con incontinencia anal leve y moderada, la puntuación de incontinencia fecal mejoró significativamente en el grupo de gel intra-anal con copolímero de poliacrilato-polialcohol en comparación con la estimulación eléctrica endoanal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B938. (Traducción- Dr Leonardo Alfonso Bustamante-Lopez).

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 210: Fecal Incontinence

Fecal incontinence, or the involuntary leakage of solid or loose stool, is estimated to affect 7-15% of community-dwelling women (1). It is associated with reduced quality of life, negative psychologic effects, and social stigma (2), yet many women do not report their symptoms or seek treatment. Less than 3% of women who do self-report fecal incontinence will have this diagnosis recorded in their medical record (3). Obstetrician-gynecologists are in a unique position to identify women with fecal incontinence because pregnancy, childbirth, obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS), and pelvic floor dysfunction are important risk factors that contribute to fecal incontinence in women. The purpose of this Practice Bulletin is to provide evidence-based guidelines on the screening, evaluation, and management of fecal incontinence to help obstetrician-gynecologists diagnose the condition and provide conservative treatment or referral for further work up and surgical management when appropriate. For discussion on fecal incontinence associated with OASIS, see Practice Bulletin No. 198, Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery (4).

Effect of gender on the etiology of fecal incontinence: Retrospective analysis of a tertiary referral center in Turkey

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Anorectal diseases, including fecal incontinence, are prevalent and have an enormous impact on the quality of life. Therefore, investigating their etiological factors may help to reduce the incidence and/or the severity of the underlying diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Referral complaints (constipation, strained defecation, and incontinence) and medical and anorectal manometry records of 883 (562 female/321 male, ages 45.17±1.00 and 48.41±0.63 years, respectively) patients were evaluated retrospectively. Maximal resting pressure (MRP) and maximal squeeze pressure (MSP) measured by stationary pull-through technique, volume of rectoanal inhibitory reflex, and sensory threshold to rectal balloon distention (ST) were obtained by water perfusion system. Data were compared according to referral complaints, age, gender, parity, and underlying diseases.

RESULTS

Incontinence was the most frequent referral complaint in 61.2% of females and 67.6% of males. MRP and MSP were significantly lower in incontinent females than in the other groups. In incontinent males, MSP was lower than the strained defecation group, and ST was higher than the constipation group. Age was negatively correlated with MRP for both of the genders and in all groups. Obstetric trauma (85%) and number of parity (3.40±2.59) were significantly higher in incontinent females. Moreover, the most prevalent underlying disease was diabetes in incontinent females (13.7%) and neurological diseases, including traumas, in incontinent males (41.5%).

CONCLUSION

Increasing awareness of labor safety, controlling diabetes mellitus, and preventing obstetric traumas may reduce the prevalence of fecal incontinence.

Prevalence of fecal incontinence and associated risk factors in elderly outpatients: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Data on the prevalence of fecal incontinence in elderly patients admitted to outpatient clinics in Turkey are scarce.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of fecal incontinence and the associated risk factors in the elderly outpatients.

METHODS

Patients 60 years and older admitted to a geriatrics outpatient clinic between October 2013 and March 2014 were included. Demographic characteristics, anthropometric measurements, marital status, educational status, parity (for females), fecal incontinence (FI), urinary incontinence (UI), constipation, comorbid conditions, and medications were recorded. FI assessment was based on the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI).

RESULTS

A total of 364 patients (64.8% female, n = 236) with a mean age of 73.2 ± 8.1 years were enrolled in the study. The prevalence of FI was 9.9% (10.2% female, 9.4% male). UI was 42.6%. Co-occurrence of FI and UI was 7.4%. According to the FISI, the most frequent type of defecation was liquid stool (61.1%). While the predictive factors for FI were polypharmacy (standardized coefficient, [r] = 0.203, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.009-0.040, p = 0.002), UI (r = 0.134, 95% CI = 0.006-0.156, p = 0.035), and being married (r = 0.200, 95% CI = -0.088 to -0.020, p = 0.002) in females, those were UI (r = 0.306, 95% CI = 0.093-0.309, p < 0.001) and polypharmacy (r = 0.251, 95% CI = 0.009-0.043, p = 0.003) in males.

CONCLUSIONS

In both genders, urinary incontinence and polypharmacy seem to be the most important risk factors for fecal incontinence. Fecal incontinence should be questioned in detail and evaluated using FISI in elderly outpatients.

Fecal incontinence in irritable bowel syndrome: Prevalence and associated factors in Swedish and American patients

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence (FI) is a prevalent but poorly recognized problem in the general population with profound negative effects on daily life. The prevalence of FI in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and its association with clinical, demographic, and pathophysiological factors remain largely unknown.

METHODS

One US (n=304) and one Swedish (n=168) patient cohort fulfilling Rome III criteria for IBS completed Rome III diagnostic questions on FI and IBS symptoms, and questionnaires on IBS symptom severity, quality of life, anxiety and depression, and work productivity impairment. The patients also underwent assessments of colorectal sensitivity and motility.

KEY RESULTS

Fecal incontinence ≥ one day per month was reported by 19.7% (USA) and 13.7% (Sweden) of IBS patients. These proportions rose to 43.4% and 29.8% if patients with less frequent FI were included. Fecal incontinence prevalence was higher in older age groups, with a clear increase above age 40. Irritable bowel syndrome patients with FI reported greater overall IBS symptom severity, more frequent and loose stools, and greater urgency. Negative effects of FI on quality of life, psychological distress, and work productivity were demonstrated. No associations were found between colorectal physiology and FI.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Fecal incontinence is common in IBS patients, and similar to previous general population reports, the major risk factors for FI in IBS are older age, rectal urgency, and loose, frequent stools. When IBS patients have comorbid FI, the impact on quality of life, psychological symptoms, and work impairment appears greater.

Fecal Incontinence: Epidemiology, Impact, and Treatment

Fecal incontinence (FI) is a chronic and debilitating condition that carries a significant health, economic, and social burden. FI has a considerable psychosocial and financial impact on patients and their families. A variety of treatment modalities are available for FI including behavioral and dietary modifications, pharmacotherapy, pelvic floor physical therapy, bulking agents, anal sphincteroplasty, sacral nerve stimulation, artificial sphincters, magnetic sphincters, posterior anal sling, and colostomy.