Risk factors for severe obstetric perineal lacerations

Racial/Ethnic Impact on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Multicentric Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs), third- and fourth-degree lacerations, represent a severe obstetric complication. Previous studies reported a higher incidence of OASIs in Asian women in non-Asian countries. This study was aimed at establishing a different OASIs prevalence among the racial/ethnic groups in Southern European centers.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study that included pregnant women who had vaginal singleton delivery between January 2019 and September 2022 in two Italian University hospitals, Naples and Novara, was conducted. We excluded cesarean sections, nonvertex presentation, preterm delivery, multiple pregnancies, congenital malformations, or stillbirths. Statistical analysis with an independent association of ethnicity to the risk of OASIs using clinical characteristics-adjusted multivariate logistic regression was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 3,049 pregnant women were included. 2.33% (71 patients) had an OASI. The median age was 31 years (IQR 7.00) and median gestational age was 39 weeks (IQR 1.40). Mean birth weight was 3,300 g (IQR 580.00). 1' and 5' Apgar scores were 9 and 9. The univariate logistic regression was not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for baseline clinical characteristics showed an OR 2.540 (p value 0.01) for OASIs in Asian women. Primiparous and secondiparous were protective factors for OASIs with OR 0.224 (p value < 0.001) and OR 0.209 (p value 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm racial/ethnic disparities regarding OASIs, with an elevated risk for Asian women in Southern Europe. Prevention strategies and obstetric care in developed countries should be modulated to offset the risk of OASIs in this population. Additional research is needed to explain the specific mechanisms of these disparities.

Prevalence and factors associated with the perception of perineal laceration: a cross-sectional study with data from the Nascer no Brasil Survey, 2011 and 2012

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of perineal laceration, based on the self-reported perception of postpartum women, and to analyze factors associated with its occurrence in Brazil.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study conducted with 23,894 postpartum women, excluding twin pregnancies, cesarean sections, and births with episiotomies, between 2011 and 2012. Prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) of association between the event and maternal, fetus/newborn, obstetric and clinical management characteristics were estimated in hierarchical Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

Out of 4,606 postpartum women, 49.5% (95%CI 46.1;42.9) self-reported perineal laceration. Being an adolescent (PR = 1.12; 95%CI 1.02;1.25), primipara (PR = 1.47; 95%CI 1.33;1.63), having had excessive gestational weight gain (PR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.07;1.29) and having undergone the Kristeller maneuver (PR = 1.18; 95%CI 1.08;1.29) increased the proportion of the outcome.

CONCLUSION

The results found call for prenatal care and adjustments to childbirth care so as to be in accordance with current recommendations.

MAIN RESULTS

Prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration was 49.5%. Being in the adolescent age group, primiparity, excessive gestational weight and the Kristeller maneuver were risk factors associated with the event.

IMPLICATIONS FOR SERVICES

Studying self-reported prevalence of perineal laceration supports new care practices, highlights the prevention of risk factors considered modifiable and confirms the need to follow current guidelines.

PERSPECTIVES

New national studies are needed comparing prevalence of self-reported perineal laceration with that recorded in medical records in order to support care practices and public obstetric policies.

Effects of Perineal Warm Compresses during the Second Stage of Labor on Reducing Perineal Trauma and Relieving Postpartum Perineal Pain in Primiparous Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses

Non-pharmaceutical midwifery techniques, including perineal warm compresses, to improve maternal outcomes remain controversial. The aims of this study are to assess the effects of perineal warm compresses on reducing perineal trauma and postpartum perineal pain relief. This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched seven bibliographic databases, three RCT register websites, and two dissertation databases for publications from inception to 15 March 2023. Chinese and English publications were included. Two independent reviewers conducted the risk of bias assessment, data extraction, and the evaluation of the certainty of the evidence utilizing the Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 assessment criteria, the Review Manager 5.4, and the online GRADEpro tool, respectively. Seven RCTs involving 1362 primiparous women were included. The combined results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the second-, third- and/or fourth- degree perineal lacerations, the incidence of episiotomy, and the relief of the short-term perineal pain postpartum (within two days). There was a potential favorable effect on improving the integrity of the perineum. However, the results did not show a statistically significant supportive effect on reducing first-degree perineal lacerations and the rate of perineal lacerations requiring sutures. In summary, perineal warm compresses effectively reduced the second-, third-/or fourth-degree perineal trauma and decreased the short-term perineal pain after birth.

Contributory effects of individual characteristics on pelvic floor distress in women with pelvic floor dysfunctions

OBJECTIVE

To determine individual characteristics (i.e. sociodemographic and medical, obstetric and gynecological, and musculoskeletal and anthropometric parameters) for greater pelvic floor distress (PFD).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed in 253 women with pelvic floor dysfunction. PFD was assessed using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20). The score of Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 (UDI-6) was used to perform secondary analyses. Sociodemographic, medical, and obstetric & gynecological parameters were recorded. Waist and hip circumferences and pelvic diameters were measured as anthropometric parameters. Pearson test, t-test, and linear regression analyses were conducted with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Education level (r = -0.23, p < .001; r = -0.24, p < .001), number of vaginal births (r = 0.15, p = .012; r = 0.12, p = .048), total vaginal birth weight (r = 0.15, p = .021; r = 0.16, p = .019), and Body Mass Index (r = 0.12, p = .043; r = 0.16, p = .007) were significantly correlated with the higher PFDI-20 and UDI-6 scores. The maternal age at the first vaginal birth (r = -0.13, p = .049) and pelvic antero-posterior diameter (r = 0.17, p = .013) were also significantly correlated with higher UDI-6 score. Linear regression analyses revealed that younger age (Beta coefficient (β) = -1.10, p = .005), greater symptom duration (β = 2.28, p = .001), the presence of chronic cough/constipation (β = 25.72, p = .001), and increased total vaginal birth weight (β = 2.38, p = .030) were associated with the greater PFDI-20 score. Increased pelvic antero-posterior diameter (β = 0.88, p = .049) was a contributory factor for the greater UDI-6 score.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that younger age, chronic cough/constipation, higher total vaginal birth weight, greater symptom duration, and pelvic antero-posterior diameter can be contributors of greater PFD. We suggest further longitudinal studies that better reveal the causal relationship between individual characteristics and PFD.

Pelvic floor function after third and fourth degree perineal lacerations: a case-control study on quality of life

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this study was to compare the quality of life between women with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and women with intact perineum or minor vaginal tears following their first vaginal birth through a validated urogynaecological questionnaire. As a secondary aim, we wanted to identify the specific symptoms for pelvic floor dysfunction after a vaginal birth.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-three cases (III- and IV-degree vaginal tears) and 133 controls (intact perineum or I- and II-degree vaginal tear) were asked to fill the PFDI-20 condition-specific and quality of life survey at three and 12 months after vaginal delivery. The survey evaluates pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms through three subsections: the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (POPDI), the Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI), and Urinary Distress Inventory, (UDI). The scoring system ranges from 0 (no distress) to 100 (maximum distress) for each subsection, subsequently summed up to obtain the summary score (0 to 300). The patients recruited were asked to complete the survey at 3- and 12-months follow-up visit. Accordingly, data collection started. Categorical variables were subjected to Chi-square test or Fisher's Exact test. Quantitative variables were compared through Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney test.

RESULTS

All surveys have shown statistically significant differences when comparing the cases to the control group. Consequently, PFDI-20 has shown a strong correlation between III- and IV-grade lacerations and pelvic floor dysfunction persistence at 12 months after delivery. Intestinal symptoms were the most reported disturbances among women with previous OASI.

CONCLUSIONS

Major vaginal tears have demonstrated to have a strong impact on women's quality of life up to a follow-up of 12 months. The use of PFDI-20 questionnaire is a useful and valid tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of genital prolapse, fecal and urinary incontinence in primiparous women with a history of OASI. Thus, its application in clinical practice can help offering the most adequate rehabilitative treatment.

The infection, cervical and perineal lacerations in relation to postpartum hemorrhage following vaginal delivery induced by Cook balloon catheter

OBJECTIVE

To identify whether infection, cervical laceration and perineal laceration are associated with postpartum hemorrhage in the setting of vaginal delivery induced by Cook balloon catheter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective study included 362 women who gave birth vaginally at or beyond 37 weeks of gestation with a diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage between February 2021 to May 2022, of which including 216 women with induction of labor (Cook balloon catheter followed by oxytocin or oxytocin) and 146 women with spontaneous delivery. Risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage were collected and compared.

RESULTS

362 women were divided into three groups, group 1 with spontaneous delivery, group 2 with oxytocin, group 3 with Cook balloon catheter followed by oxytocin. There was no significant difference in incidence of infection within three groups (P > 0.05). The rate of cervical laceration and perineal laceration was significantly higher in group 3 compared with groups 2 and 1 (P < 0.05); Multivariate logistic regression analysis found that compared with group 1, either group 3 or group 2 was associated with increased risks of cervical laceration and perineal laceration (P < 0.05), and compared with group 2, group 3 was not associated with increased risks of cervical laceration and perineal laceration (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Infection, cervical laceration and perineal laceration are identified not to be independent risk factors for postpartum hemorrhage for women undergoing labor with Cook balloon catheter; Cervical laceration and perineal laceration increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage in women with labor induction.

The association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at time of vaginal delivery

BACKGROUND

The risk of third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in patients with obesity is relatively understudied and has mixed findings in existing literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to examine the association of maternal obesity and obstetric anal sphincter injuries at vaginal delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample was retrospectively queried to examine 7,385,341 vaginal deliveries from January 2017 to December 2019. The exposure assignment was obesity status. The main outcomes were third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery. Statistical analysis examining the exposure-outcome association included (1) inverse probability of treatment weighting with log-Poisson regression generalized linear model to account for prepregnant and pregnant confounders for the exposure and (2) multinomial regression model to account for delivery factors in the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort. The secondary outcomes included (1) the temporal trends of fourth-degree laceration and its associated factors at cohort level and (2) risk factor patterns for fourth-degree laceration by constructing a classification tree model.

RESULTS

In the inverse probability of treatment weighting cohort, patients with obesity were less likely to have fourth-degree lacerations and third-degree lacerations than patients without obesity (fourth-degree laceration: 2.3 vs 3.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-0.69; third-degree laceration: 15.6 vs 20.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 0.79; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.82). In contrast, in patients with obesity vs those without obesity, forceps delivery (54.7 vs 3.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 17.73; 95% confidence interval, 16.17-19.44), vacuum-assisted delivery (19.8 vs 2.9 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 4.85-5.53), episiotomy (19.2 vs 2.8 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 3.71-4.20), and shoulder dystocia (17.8 vs 3.4 per 1000 vaginal deliveries, respectively; adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 2.29-2.94) were associated with more than a 2-fold increased risk of fourth-degree perineal laceration. Among the group with obesity, patients who had forceps delivery and shoulder dystocia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (105.3 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). Among the group without obesity, patients who had forceps delivery, shoulder dystocia, and macrosomia had the highest incidence of fourth-degree laceration (294.1 per 1000 vaginal deliveries). The incidence of fourth-degree perineal laceration decreased by 11.9% over time (P trend=.004); moreover, forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, and episiotomy decreased by 3.8%, 7.6%, and 29.5%, respectively (all, P trend<.05).

CONCLUSION

This national-level analysis suggests that patients with obesity are less likely to have obstetric anal sphincter injuries at the time of vaginal delivery. Furthermore, this analysis confirms other known risk factors for fourth-degree laceration, such as forceps delivery, vacuum-assisted delivery, episiotomy, and shoulder dystocia. However, we noted a decreasing trend in fourth-degree lacerations, which may be due to evolving obstetrical practices.

Knowledge, attitude and acceptability regarding antenatal perineal massage in Thai pregnant women

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Antenatal perineal massage for obstetric anal sphincter injury prevention is not routinely performed in Thailand. Due to the cultural conservatism in the country, attitudes and acceptability need to be evaluated before procedure implementation. This research was conducted to evaluate knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage and identify associated factors for acceptability in antenatal perineal massage among Thai pregnant women.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in the antenatal clinic at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand between July 2021 and June 2022. Thai women with singleton pregnancies at 22 weeks or more of gestation without an indication for cesarean section were enrolled. Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of antenatal perineal massage were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. In-depth interviews with pregnant women who were not interested in antenatal perineal massage were also completed.

RESULTS

A total of 144 pregnant women were enrolled with 119 participants (83%) having an accepting attitude about antenatal perineal massage. Results on knowledge included 22 (15%) participants aware of this practice, 46 participants (31.9%) knew it should be practiced after GA 34 weeks, 52 participants (36.1%) knew the massage should be maintained for 5-10 min, and 37 participants (25.7%) knew it should be performed daily. Factors associated with acceptability of antenatal perineal massage were prior interest in perineal massage and trust in the benefit of the perineal massage in facilitating vaginal delivery. Reasons for disagreeing in antenatal perineal massage included never hearing of perineal massage, concern about pregnancy complications, fear of pain, believing it to be a useless procedure, and previous successful vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

We found high acceptability for antenatal perineal massage. This program should be routinely explained and offered to Thai pregnant women to prevent severe perineal trauma and postpartum complications.

Effects of perineal massage during childbirth on maternal and neonatal outcomes in primiparous women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perineal massage during childbirth has been recommended as an effective measure to prevent perineal injury. However, the overall effects of perineal massage during childbirth on maternal and neonatal outcomes in primiparous women remain inconclusive. Particularly, the effects of perineal massage begun during different stages of labor need to be further investigated.

OBJECTIVES

To comprehensively review the effects of perineal massage during childbirth on primiparous health outcomes, including perineal-related outcomes, duration of labor, hemorrhage and postpartum perineal pain, and neonatal outcomes, including Apgar scores and neonatal complications, and to further explore the effects of perineal massage begun during different stages of labor.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis following the Cochrane Handbook guidelines and PRISMA2020.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy was developed following the three-phase search approach, and the literature search was conducted in electronic databases and clinical trial registers from inception to 7th January 2022. Study selection and data extraction were completed independently by two researchers. The updated Cochrane risk of bias 2.0 tool for randomized trials was chosen to evaluate the quality of included studies. Data analyses were conducted using the Revman5.4 software, and subgroup analyses were performed based on the different start times of perineal massage. Furthermore, the certainty of body of evidence for each outcome was assessed utilizing the GRADEpro online tool.

RESULTS

Seventeen randomized controlled trials involving 3248 primiparous women were included in the review. The pooled results of meta-analyses indicated that perineal massage begun during the second stage of labor significantly increased the occurrence of intact perineum (RR = 2.78, 95 % CI: [1.52, 5.05], P < 0.001), reduced the rate of second- and third-degree perineal lacerations (P < 0.05), and decreased the incidence of episiotomy (RR = 0.63, 95 % CI: [0.50, 0.79], P < 0.001), while perineal massage during the first stage of labor effectively shortened the duration of the first and second stages of labor (P < 0.05). The available evidence also suggests the potential role of perineal massage on hemorrhage and long-term postpartum perineal pain (P < 0.05). However, the aggregated results failed to demonstrate the beneficial effects of perineal massage on neonatal outcomes (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Perineal massage begun during the second stage of labor effectively improves the perineal-related outcomes in primiparous women, while perineal massage during the first stage of labor significantly shortens the duration of labor. High-quality studies exploring the standardized procedure for perineal massage and the short- and long-term effects of perineal massage are warranted.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022302336 (PROSPERO).

Childbirth simulation to assess cephalopelvic disproportion and chances for failed labor in a French population

Reducing failed labor and emergency cesarean section (CS) rates is an important goal. A childbirth simulation tool (PREDIBIRTH software and SIM37 platform) that evaluates a 5-min magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment performed at 37 weeks of gestation was developed to enhance the consulting obstetrician's ability to predict the optimal delivery mode. We aimed to determine the potential value of this childbirth simulation tool in facilitating the selection of an optimal delivery mode for both mother and infant. A retrospective cohort study was performed on all patients referred by their obstetricians to our level 2 maternity radiology department between December 15, 2015 and November 15, 2016, to undergo MRI pelvimetry at approximately 37 weeks of gestation. The childbirth simulation software was employed to predict the optimal delivery mode based on the assessment of cephalopelvic disproportion. The prediction was compared with the actual outcome for each case. Including childbirth simulations in the decision-making process had the potential to reduce emergency CSs, inappropriately scheduled CSs, and instrumental vaginal deliveries by up to 30.1%, 20.7%, and 20.0%, respectively. Although the use of the simulation tool might not have affected the overall CS rate, consideration of predicted birthing outcomes has the potential to improve the allocation between scheduled CS and trial of labor. The routine use of childbirth simulation software as a clinical support tool when choosing the optimal delivery mode for singleton pregnancies with a cephalic presentation could reduce the number of emergency CSs, insufficiently justified CSs, and instrumental deliveries.

Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Research evaluating optimal repair techniques for the reduction of postpartum dyspareunia following obstetric laceration is severely limited. Prevailing guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) are reliant on data from just nine clinical trials conducted from 1980 to 2012. While the literature on this topic is still limited today, this review aims to synthesize data from past and present studies to ensure that standing clinical recommendations are supported by current literature. A review was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Included articles (1) compared continuous with interrupted repair techniques for subjects with episiotomies and/or second-degree tears, (2) were available in full length, and (3) reported dyspareunia as an outcome variable. Excluded articles were those (1) inclusive of first-, third-, or fourth-degree tears; (2) comparing suture material rather than technique; and (3) not available in English. A meta-analysis was conducted for both acute dyspareunia (<3 months) and chronic dyspareunia (>3 months) utilizing Meta-Essentials Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) workbook. Bias was evaluated via Egger regression and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation tests. Twelve articles met inclusion and exclusion guidelines, seven for acute dyspareunia and eight for chronic dyspareunia. All publications were randomized controlled trials and were inclusive of a total of 4,081 patients. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effect model. Analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between continuous and interrupted suture groups for acute dyspareunia (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.89-1.08) or chronic dyspareunia (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.83-1.12). Egger regression test (p-value=0.534) and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test (p-value=0.570) indicated minimal publication bias. Compiled data does not indicate a preferential suture technique for the reduction of postpartum dyspareunia. These findings are congruent with the ACOG guidelines; therefore, there is no supporting evidence for ACOG's recommendation of continuous suturing to be overturned.

Is there an Association between Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Prediction and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate whether there is an association between the predicted probability of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) and the occurrence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

STUDY DESIGN

This was a single-site retrospective cohort study of all women with a singleton vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section between January 2011 and December 2016. Women were divided into four ordinal groupings by the predicted probability of achieving vaginal birth after cesarean using the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network VBAC calculator (less than 41%, 40.1-60%, 60.1-80%, and greater than 80%). The primary outcome was OASIS, defined as a 3rd or 4th degree perineal laceration. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were used to examine the association between predicted VBAC probability and OASIS.

RESULTS

In total, 1,411 women met inclusion criteria and 73 (5.2%) sustained OASIS. The median predicted probability of VBAC was lower in women with OASIS compared with those without OASIS (60% [interquartile range {IQR}: 48-70%] vs. 66% (IQR: 52-80%), p = 0.02]. On bivariable and multivariable logistic regression, predicted probability of VBAC was associated with increased odds of OASIS (less than 41% probability: adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.90-11.21; 41-60% probability: aOR: 3.76, 95% CI: 1.34-10.57; 61-80% probability aOR: 3.47, 95% CI: 1.25-9.69) relative to women with a predicted probability of VBAC of greater than 80%.

CONCLUSION

Having a lower predicted probability of VBAC is associated with an increased risk of OASIS at the time of a VBAC relative to those with greater than 80% predicted probability. Incorporation of this aspect of maternal morbidity may inform risk-stratification at the time of trial of labor after cesarean, as well as the choice of performing an operative vaginal delivery.

KEY POINTS

· Predicted probability of VBAC is associated with OASIS.. · Low predicted probability of VBAC is associated with increased odds of OASIS.. · Forceps delivery was associated with the highest odds of OASIS..

A Search for Novel Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate factors associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury and identify modifiable risks.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed in women who gave birth at our institution between May 2008 and December 2012. Patients who had a third- or fourth-degree lacerations were compared with those who did not. Parity, stretch marks, age, body mass index, tobacco use, fetal weight, operative delivery, labor, and second stage duration were compared between groups. Multivariate direct logistic regression was conducted on all patients who had complete data to calculate the adjusted odds ratio.

RESULTS

We identified 299 patients with third- or fourth-degree lacerations and 8,459 patients without third- or fourth-degree lacerations during the time frame. Duration of second stage between 1 hour and 2 hours (P < 0.0001), duration of second stage greater than 2 hours (P < 0.0001), midline or unknown type episiotomy (P < 0.0001), mediolateral episiotomy (P < 0.0001), vacuum delivery (P < 0.0001), forceps delivery (P < 0.0001), fetal weight greater than 4,000 g (P < 0.0001), and antepartum stress urinary incontinence (P < 0.006) were associated with a significant increase in high-risk lacerations. This study did not find a statistically significant association between parity and these lacerations.

CONCLUSIONS

We, as others, found that episiotomy and operative delivery were modifiable risks of obstetrical care. Furthermore, even a short second stage of labor (1-2 hours) was associated with significant risk of injury.

Prevalence of Perineal Tear Peripartum after Two Antepartum Perineal Massage Techniques: A Non-Randomised Controlled Trial

Perineal massage increases elasticity of myofascial perineal tissue and decreases the burning and perineal pain during labour, thus optimising child birth, although an application protocol has not been standardised yet. The objective of this study is to determine the efficiency of massage in perineal tear prevention and identification of possible differences in massage application. Total of 90 pregnant participants were divided into three groups: perineal massage and EPI-NO^® device group, applied by an expert physiotherapist, self-massage group, where women were instructed to apply perineal massage in domestic household, and a control group, which received ordinary obstetric attention. Results: The results showed significant differences among the control group and the two perineal massage groups in perineal postpartum pain. Correlations in perineal postpartum pain, labour duration and the baby's weight were not statistically significant. Lithotomy posture was significantly less prevalent in the massage group than in the other two; this variable is known to have a direct effect on episiotomy incidence and could act as a causal covariate of the different incidence of episiotomy in the groups. Perineal massage reduces postpartum perineal pain, prevalence and severity of perineal tear during delivery.

Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity

OBJECTIVE

 In around 85% of vaginal births, the parturients undergo perineal lacerations and/or episiotomy. The present study aimed to determine the incidence of lacerations and episiotomies among parturients in 2018 in a habitual-risk public maternity hospital in southern Brazil, and to determine the risk and protective factors for such events.

METHODOLOGY

 A retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were obtained from medical records and analyzed using the Stata software. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were performed. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

 In 2018, there were 525 vaginal births, 27.8% of which were attended by obstetricians, 70.7% by obstetric nurses, and 1.5% evolved without assistance. Overall, 55.2% of the parturients had some degree of laceration. The professional who attended the birth was a significant variable: a greater number of first- and second-degree lacerations, as well as more severe cases, occurred in births attended by nurses (odds ratio [OR]: 2,95; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1,74 to 5,03). Positions at birth that did not enable perineal protection techniques (expulsive period with the "hands-off" method), when analyzed in isolation, determined the risk; however, in the final regression model, this relationship was not confirmed. Although reported in the literature, there were no associations between the occurrence of laceration and age, skin color, or birth weight. In 24% of the births, episiotomy was performed, and doctors performed 63.5% of them.

CONCLUSION

 Births attended by nurses resulted in an increased risk of perineal lacerations, of varying degrees. In turn, those assisted by physicians had a higher occurrence of episiotomy.

Obstetric rectal laceration in the absence of an anal sphincter injury

Rectal laceration in the absence of concurrent anal sphincter injury at the time of parturition is not a frequently reported finding. This rarely encountered injury is also referred to as a buttonhole injury. It is a disruption of the vaginal and rectal tissue with resultant disruption of the anal epithelium in the setting of an intact external anal sphincter. A 30-year-old gravida 1 para 0 at 39 weeks presented for induction of labour due to chronic hypertension. During her labour course, she developed with superimposed preeclampsia with severe features and magnesium sulfate was initiated. She underwent a spontaneous vaginal delivery of an infant weighing 3840 g. Following delivery, stool was visualised in the vagina. A rectal examination revealed a rectovaginal defect separate from the second-degree perineal laceration, which extended proximally to the cervix. The anal sphincter was noted to be intact with good tone. Both defects were repaired, and she had an uncomplicated recovery.

Posterior compartment symptoms in primiparous women 1 year after non-assisted vaginal deliveries: a Swedish cohort study

Introduction and hypothesis

This is a prospective cohort follow-up study based on the hypothesis that primiparous women with non-assisted vaginal deliveries and a second-degree perineal tear have more posterior compartment symptoms 1 year after delivery than those with no or first-degree tears.

Methods

A follow-up questionnaire, including validated questions on pelvic floor dysfunction, was completed 1 year postpartum by 410 healthy primiparas, delivered without instrumental assistance at two maternity wards in Stockholm between 2013 and 2015. Main outcome measures were posterior compartment symptoms in women with second-degree perineal tears compared with women with no or only minor tears.

Results

Of 410 women, 20.9% had no or only minor tears, 75.4% had a second-degree tear, and 3.7% had a more severe tear. Of women presenting with second-degree tears, 18.9% had bowel-emptying difficulties compared with 20.0% of women with minor tears. Furthermore, almost 3% of them with second-degree tears complained of faecal incontinence (FI) of formed stool, 7.2% of FI of loose stool compared with 1.2% and 3.5% respectively in women with no or only minor tears.

Conclusions

Symptomatic pelvic floor dysfunction is common among primiparous women within 1 year following uncomplicated vaginal delivery, and there are no significant differences between second-degree perineal tears and minor tears. These symptoms should be addressed in all women after delivery to improve pelvic floor dysfunction and quality of life.

Severe Perineal Trauma in a Brazilian Southeastern Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of severe perineal trauma (obstetric and anal sphincter injury [OASIS]) in a tertiary high-risk pregnancy facility and the associated factors.

METHODS

A retrospective electronic chart review on perineal lacerations was performed from the period of April 2017 to February 2019. Obstetric and anal sphincter injury was diagnosed by a rectal examination. Primary outcome was the prevalence of OASIS (third- and fourth-degree perineal tear). Independent variables were maternal, intrapartum, and neonatal characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression models were performed. A P value lower than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The prevalence of OASIS (third/fourth-degree laceration) was 1.51% (43/2846) in our population. Our population was mostly white (66.3%) and mostly primiparous (52.1%). By comparison, the prevalence of first/second-degree laceration was 43% (1223/2846). Selective episiotomy occurred in 18.73% (517/2761) of patients, and it was not associated with OASIS (P = 0.211). Advanced maternal age (P = 0.196), higher number of vaginal examinations (P = 0.169), fetal presentation (P = 0.533), and duration of second stage (P = 0.757) were not associated with OASIS. Univariate analysis has found that forceps delivery (odds ratio [OR], 3.68 [1.74-7.79]; P = 0.001), neonatal macrossomy (OR, 3.42 [1.02-11.43]; P = 0.045), and larger head circumference (OR, 1.15 [1.02-1.32]; P = 0.026) were risk factors for OASIS, whereas higher gravidity reduced the risk (OR, 0.61 [0.42-0.91] for OASIS. However, after multivariate analysis, only head circumference (OR, 1.86 [1.10-3.14]; P = 0.020) remained as a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger neonatal head circumference increased in 86% the risk for severe perineal trauma in this cohort of women.

Evaluation of a policy of restrictive episiotomy on the incidence of perineal tears among women with spontaneous vaginal delivery: A ten-year retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Routine episiotomy is no longer recommended to limit obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIs). We aimed to evaluate the effect of a restrictive policy of episiotomy on the risk of OASIs during spontaneous vaginal deliveries.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center observational study among women with a term singleton cephalic fetus, with spontaneous vaginal delivery. The occurrence of episiotomy, intact perineum, first, second, third or fourth-degree (OASIs) perineal tears were compared before (period A, from 01/01/2006 to 12/31/2008) and after (period B, from 01/01/2012 to 12/31/2016) implementation of the restrictive policy. Odds of perineal tear were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models, stratified by parity.

RESULTS

From 2006-2016, the rate of episiotomy decreased, from 14.9 % (n/N=200/1141) to 4.7 % (94/1912). In period B (N=8984) vs A (N=8984), the rates of episiotomy were, 12.9 vs 26.6 % for nulliparas (p<0.01) and 2.3 vs 6.8 % for multiparas (p<0.01). Odds of OASIs were not different in period B vs A, both for nulliparas (0.9 vs 0.8 %, AOR=0.88(0.38-2.05)) and multiparas (0.4 vs 0.2 %, AOR=2.28(0.63-8.29). Odds of second-degree tear were higher in period B vs A, both for nulliparas (39.8 vs 17.4 %, AOR=2.55(2.11-3.08) and multiparas (26.2 vs 12.8 %, AOR=2.26(1.95-2.66)); and odds of intact perineum were lower (for nulliparas, 15.8 vs 24.9 %, AOR=0.61(0.42-0.90) and for multiparas, 47.1 vs 56.0 %, AOR=0.61(0.49-0.76)). No difference was observed for first-degree tears.

CONCLUSION

The progressive implementation of a restrictive policy of episiotomy during spontaneous vaginal delivery was not associated with an increased risk of OASIs over a ten-year period.

Risk factors associated with severe perineal tears: A five-year study

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to describe risk factors associated with 34DPT in operative and non-operative vaginal deliveries, over a five-year period.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study including 39,227 vaginal deliveries from 2013 to 2017 in a single French University Hospital. Annual characteristics of the analyzed population were recorded. Univariate logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between these characteristics and 34DPT. Multivariate analysis was used to identify combinations of risk factors associated with instrumental delivery.

RESULTS

The rate of perineal tears was constantly rising but rate of 34DPT was stable, ranging between 0.8 and 1.4% over the study period. Cesarean section rate was stable between 18.8% and 19.6%. Rate of diabetes, preeclampsia and obesity (BMI < 40) was increasing and episiotomy rate decreasing (from 19.8% to 11.8%). Operative deliveries rate remained stable between 11 and 12.8%. Multivariate regression showed that gestational age over 39 weeks (aOR 1.18, 95% CI [1.02; 1.35]), birth weight over 3500 g (aOR 1.62, 95% CI [1.05; 2.49]) were associated with 34DPT in patients without operative vaginal deliveries but not episiotomy. Gestational age (aOR 1.71, 95% CI [1.18; 2.47]), episiotomy (aOR 0.55, 95% CI [0.38; 0.79]) and diabetes (aOR 1.73, 95% CI [1.15; 2.61]) were associated with 34DPT among patients with operative vaginal deliveries.

CONCLUSION

In a tertiary medical center model with low cesarean section rate, factors associated with 34DPT were different among patients with or without operative vaginal delivery. The question of the protective effect of mediolateral episiotomy against 34DPT in case of operative delivery deserves further investigations.

Episiotomy: a medicolegal vicious cycle

The present study aimed to analyze the litigation trends and ensuing compensatory damages brought about by the use of episiotomy, in order to outline a set of cautionary rules meant to limit the scope of legreal aftermath for both doctors and health care facilities. The authors have set out to gain an insight into the controversial practice of episiotomy, in light of available research data and official positions of various scientific and medical associations, with a close focus on the legal and medical viability of the procedure itself. Court data and trial records have been taken into account as well, via searches into legal databases and search engines (Justia, Lexis, Jurist.org, Venice Courthouse, etc.). This review showed that most episiotomy-related lawsuits stemmed from a routine use of that procedure, which is almost universally advised against, and without valid informed consent having been gained. Ultimately, authors have seen fit to underscore the need for patients potentially eligible for an episiotomy (selective episiotomy) to receive thorough and understandable information in a timely fashion including the necessity and the effectiveness of the procedure as well as the risks involved, so that a well-informed decision can be made based on factual data.

Selective episiotomy versus no episiotomy for severe perineal trauma: a systematic review with meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized whether a non-episiotomy protocol or administration of selective episiotomy as an intrapartum intervention would modify the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).

METHODS

We registered this systematic review with the PROSPERO database (CRD42018111018). Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included from databases until February 2019. The primary outcome was OASIS, and the secondary outcomes were any perineal trauma, duration of the second stage of labor, instrumental delivery, and post-partum hemorrhage. The risk of bias (Cochrane Handbook) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria were used to assess the RCTs.

RESULTS

A total of 1,833 results (PubMed 650, SCOPUS 1,144, Cochrane Library 33, LILACS 6) were obtained. However, only 2 studies fulfilled the criteria for quantitative analysis and meta-analysis (n = 574). The non-episiotomy arm included two episiotomies (1.7% of deliveries), whereas the selective episiotomy included 33 episiotomies (21.4%). Performance of selective episiotomy demonstrated no difference compared with that of the non-episiotomy group with regard to OASIS (OR = 0.46 [0.15-1.39]; n = 543; I² = 0%,p = 0.17), any perineal trauma (OR = 0.90 [0.61-1.33]; I² = 0%, n = 546, p = 0.59), instrumental delivery (OR = 1.40 [0.80-2.45]; I² = 0%, n = 545, p = 0.24), duration of the second stage of labor (MD = -3.71 [-21.56, 14.14]; I² = 72%,n = 546, p = 0.68), perineal pain (MD = 0.59 [0.01-1.17]; I² = 0%,p = 0.05), and post-partum hemorrhage (OR = 1.75 [0.87-3.54]; I² = 0%,n = 546,p = 0.12). The evaluated studies displayed a low risk of bias in at least four of the seven categories analyzed. GRADE demonstrated a low certainty for severe perineal tears, postpartum hemorrhage, duration of the second stage of labor, and a moderate certainty for any perineal tear.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference between non-episiotomy and selective episiotomy regarding OASIS. No RCT was able to confirm a benefit of the non-performance of episiotomies in the non-episiotomy arm.

How do sustained birth tears after vaginal birth affect birth tear patterns in a subsequent birth?

Background Tears are common after vaginal birth, and different impact factors are known. However, the impact of tears from a previous birth to the tears of a subsequent birth is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the distribution of birth tear patterns according to the sustained tears in a previous birth, in addition to other impact factors. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we evaluated all women up to parity 4 with subsequent vaginal, singleton births of vertex presentation at ≥37 + 0 gestational weeks between 1/2005 and 12/2016. Their tears were grouped into tear patterns and were analyzed by parity. Tear patterns in the subsequent births were analyzed in association to the patterns of the previous births and impact factors were evaluated. Results We counted 4017 births in 1855 women [P1: 1368 (34.1%), P2: 1730 (43.1%), P3: 741 (18.4%), P4: 178 (4.4%)]. The frequency of tears and episiotomies decreased with higher parity, whereas the frequency of intact perineum increased. Twenty-eight different unique tear patterns were found. We could show that birth tear patterns changed with increasing parity and were associated with sustained tears in a previous birth. In addition, some impact factors on tear patterns could be identified. Conclusion The distribution of the single tear types is in accordance with the current literature. However, it is new that distinct tear patterns are associated to sustained tear patterns of previous births. Furthermore, we demonstrated some weak associations of tear patterns to certain impact factors, such as more episiotomies, low-grade perineal or vaginal tears isolated or in combination with other tears with increasing fetal weight and head circumference in the higher parities, and with a longer duration of the second stage and the pushing phase in lower parities.

Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during childbirth: An updated meta-analysis

Several studies have investigated the importance of maternal, fetal factors and intrapartum characteristics in predicting severe perineal lacerations. The purpose of the present systematic review is to accumulate current evidence and provide estimated effect sizes for the various risk factors described. We reviewed Medline, Scopus, Clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials CENTRAL and Google Scholar for published studies in the field for observational studies as well as randomized controlled trials. Two researchers independently assessed the included studies and documented outcomes. Data extraction was performed using a modified data form that was based in Cochrane`s data collection form for intervention reviews for RCTs and non-RCTs. Forty-three articles were selected for inclusion in the present systematic review. The analyzed population reached 716,031 parturient of whom 22,280 (3,1%) sustained third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations. Several risk factors were identified. Instrumental delivery [RR 3.38 (2.21, 5.18)], midline episiotomy [RR 2.88 (1.79, 4.65)] and a persistent occiput posterior position [RR 2.73 (2.08, 3.58)] were associated with the higher risk of developing severe perineal lacerations. Mediolateral episiotomy did not increase, but was also not protective against perineal lacerations [RR 1.55 (0.95, 2.53)]. Several factors contribute to the development of severe perineal lacerations. The present meta-analysis presents accumulated data that may help physicians estimate risks and provide appropriate patient counseling.

Selective use of episiotomy: what is the impact on perineal trauma? Results from a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of selective use of episiotomy on perineal trauma.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study on consecutive vaginal deliveries from January 2010 to December 2016. From January 2010 to December 2011 episiotomy was performed liberally, based only on individual midwife/doctor's decision. Since January 2012, a shared selective use of episiotomy policy has been introduced. To evaluate the range of perineal trauma in spontaneous second-degree perineal tears, a sub-classification of second-degree lacerations has been introduced dividing them into two sub-groups: A (smaller than the average episiotomy) and B (spontaneous vaginal tear larger than the average episiotomy). The primary outcomes were the incidence and type of perineal trauma, with the proportion of type A and type B second-degree spontaneous tears under a policy of selective episiotomy.

RESULTS

Deliveries not exposed to selective use of episiotomy were 1583 (Group 1), those exposed to selective use of episiotomy were 6409 (Group 2). In Group 2 episiotomy rate decreased, and incidence of intact perineum, first- and second-degree lacerations increased. The incidence of third- and fourth-degree lacerations did not change. Spontaneous second-degree lacerations occurred in 19.4% and 36.8% of women in group 1 and 2, respectively. With a selective episiotomy policy, 88.3% of second-degree tears was classified as type A.

CONCLUSIONS

The selective use of episiotomy is clinically feasible and effective. This policy seems to be associated with a lower delivery-related perineal trauma as showed by the sub-classification, that could be a useful tool to monitor obstetric care.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery

Lacerations are common after vaginal birth. Trauma can occur on the cervix, vagina, and vulva, including the labial, periclitoral, and periurethral regions, and the perineum. Most of these lacerations do not result in adverse functional outcomes. Severe perineal lacerations, extending into or through the anal sphincter complex, although less frequent, are more commonly associated with increased risk of pelvic floor injury, fecal and urinary incontinence, pain, and sexual dysfunction with symptoms that may persist or be present many years after giving birth. The purpose of this document is to provide evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and repair of obstetric lacerations and for episiotomy.

Intact Perineum: What are the Predictive Factors in Spontaneous Vaginal Birth?

Introduction

Perineal trauma at birth is distressing for women and can cause serious short and long term morbidity.

Aim

Investigate the prevalence and predictive factors of intact perineum after normal vaginal birth among Portuguese women who had spontaneous vaginal births.

Methods

A descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective study was carried out among pregnant women who had spontaneous vaginal births, between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, in a single birth centre in Portugal. Following ethical approval, the prevalence of intact perineum was calculated and multivariate analysis with logistic regression was carried out, to identify the predictive factors of having an intact perineum after spontaneous vaginal birth.

Results

A total of 1748 pregnant women had spontaneous vaginal births. Four hundred and forty-one women (25.2%) had intact perineum whereas in 1307 (74.8%) of women, the perineum was not intact. First-degree tears occurred in 23.2% (405/1748) of women, second-degree tears occurred in 4% (70/1748) of women while three women (0.2%) experienced a third-degree tear. The rate of episiotomies was 43.8% (766/1748). Episiotomy and first-degree tears occurred in 2.6% (45/1748), episiotomy and second-degree tears occurred in 0.7% (12/1748), while episiotomy and third-degree tears occurred in 0.3% (6/1748) of women. Having a previous caesarean section reduced the odds of intact perineum by 60%, while nulliparity reduced the odds by 70%. For every 250 grams increase in birth weight, the odds of sustaining an intact perineum were decreased by 13%. Alternative birth positions (excluding lithotomy) doubled the odds of maintaining an intact perineum.

Conclusion

The prevalence of intact perineum is 25,2%. Predictive factors for intact perineum include birth weight, parity, previous caesarean section and birthing position. Recognizing these factors could support and facilitate the management of spontaneous vaginal birth to promote an intact perineum. Further research is needed to gain better understanding of this phenomenon.

Evaluation of the ease of use and acceptability of an innovative device - the 'Episiometer', in ensuring an accurate mediolateral episiotomy: a pilot study

The present study was undertaken at the Port Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea, to evaluate the ease of use and acceptability of a perineal measuring device (Episiometer) for giving a correct length and angle of a mediolateral episiotomy. An Episiometer was placed on the perineum to guide the angle and length immediately before giving an episiotomy. A feedback survey was collected and the angle and length of the episiotomy were measured at the time of delivery and at 6 weeks postpartum. The length and angle of episiotomy were found to be accurate in 86% of the cases. Forty-two of the fifty (86%) clinicians felt that the Episiometer was easy or very easy to use. They also found this device to be beneficial (92%). The Episiometer seems to be an easy-to-use and feasible device that is well accepted by clinicians and patients and may aid in standardising the length and angle of an episiotomy. Impact statement What is already known on this subject? Episiotomy is the commonest obstetric procedure performed worldwide. However, the angle and length of an episiotomy vary greatly amongst operators. It is also recognised that birth trauma and an inaccurate episiotomy result in debilitating anal sphincter injury. Therefore, a pilot study was conducted to evaluate the ease of use and acceptability of a new, inexpensive, low- tech device "Episiometer" to guide clinicians and midwives to perform an appropriate episiotomy. What do the results of this study add? This pilot study to evaluate the usability of the new innovation amongst clinician and patients revealed high acceptance of the device amongst clinicians and positive attitude of the patients towards the device. The clinicians also felt the device to be an effective teaching tool. Usage if the device results in a more accurate length and angle of an episiotomy. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Further research and multicentre randomised control trials are needed to establish the effectiveness of the device in reducing the complications of episiotomy and risk of OASIS. The present study has shown the Episiometer as an acceptable and easy to use device amongst clinicians and can benefit the young clinicians as a teaching tool in directing a correct angle and length of episiotomy.

[Perineal risk and obstetrical protection: A survey with birth professionals]

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to evaluate the practices declared by birth professionals in the Lorraine region about perineal obstetric protection (any perineal tear combined). The secondary objective was to evaluate prevention measures performed in practice by birth professionals according to the perineal risk subjectively estimated for each obstetric situation.

METHODS

This is a practice survey conducted through an anonymous questionnaire distributed to birth professionals (gynecologists, interns, midwife and midwife student) in October 2016. Topics covered concerned maternal, obstetric and fetal risk factors associated with perineal (1st to 4th degrees) lesions and the associated protective measures. A descriptive analysis of the data collected was conducted.

RESULTS

One hundred and five professionals answered the questionnaire. The identified risk factors were consistent with those highlighted in the literature. Other factors, not known as associated with perineal risk, were cited by professionals (smoking, phototype). If the professional perceived a significant perineal risk, they more frequently practiced an episiotomy (15% vs. 0%, P<0.001) or considered that the delivery should be performed by an obstetrician (34% vs 8%, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

This evaluation shows that birth professionals know the main risk factors for perineal injury. On the other hand, they easily use perineal protection maneuvers (episiotomy for example) without real demonstrated effectiveness.

Perineal massage and training reduce perineal trauma in pregnant women older than 35 years: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of perineal massage, pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) and a pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) prevention educational program in pregnant women above the age of 35 years to prevent perineal tear and episiotomy.

METHODS

A randomized parallel assignment study involved two groups of pregnant women at the obstetrics outpatient clinic 4 weeks prior to their due date. The first group (n = 200) was educated to do digital perineal massage and pelvic floor muscle training and received an educational PFD prevention program. The second group (n = 200) received only the prevention education program. Occurrence of perineal laceration was reported at time of delivery as a primary outcome. Statistical analysis was done using the IBM SPSS computer program (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences; IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA), release 22 for Microsoft Windows.

RESULTS

Delivery was significantly less complicated by perineal tear, episiotomy and postnatal pain in the first than in the second group (p < 0.05). Grades of perineal tear were mostly of first and second degree in the first group compared with the second group. We found a significantly lower need for analgesia and fewer ampoules required during the hospital stay in the first group (p < 0.001, 0.002, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Performing antenatal digital perineal massage and PFMT in addition to health education is recommended to reduce perineal complications.

Obstetrical and epidemiological factors influence the severity of anal incontinence after obstetric anal sphincter injury

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) is one of the most severe obstetrical complications. Although risk factors for OASI have been identified, little is known about various parameters that can influence symptoms' severity. The aim of this study is to explore whether obstetrical and epidemiological factors can have an effect on the severity of symptoms after OASI.

METHODS

11.483 deliveries between January 2010 and December 2014 were reviewed, and data from 88 women with OASI are presented.

RESULTS

The only statistically significant differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic women were age (p = 0.02), body mass index (p = 0.04) and the use of forceps (p = 0.04). Women with more severe symptoms were more likely to have received oxytocin during the second stage of labor (p = 0.03) and had shorter delivery to follow-up interval (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Modifiable factors such as use of forceps and oxytocin should be taken into consideration in clinical practice.

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries at Vaginal Delivery: A Review of Recently Published National Guidelines

Importance

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASISs) complicate approximately 1 in 10 deliveries.

Objective

The aims of this study were to review and compare recommendations from recently published national guidelines regarding OASISs at vaginal delivery.

Evidence Acquisition

Three national guidelines on OASISs at vaginal delivery are presented through a descriptive review: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists on "The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal Tears," American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on "Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery," and Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada on "Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS): Prevention, Recognition, and Repair." These guidelines were summarized and compared in terms of prevention and management of OASISs. Quality of evidence was also reviewed based on method of reporting for each guideline.

Results

This published evidence reflects the differences between the national recommendations on the prevention and management of OASISs. Especially, as for the prevention of OASIS, routine use of episiotomy is not recommended, whereas warm perineal compresses and perineal massage during the second stage of labor seem to have a protective role. In the management of OASIS, special care is needed during the repair process of the torn anorectal mucosa and the internal and external anal sphincter. The postoperative use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, oral laxatives, and analgesia is also recommended.

Conclusions

Summarized guidelines can have an impact on special care in prevention and management of OASIS; this may support the reduction of morbidity associated with that entity.

Risk and protective factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: A retrospective nationwide study

BACKGROUND

In view of the reported increase in obstetric anal sphincter injuries, the objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of such injuries over time and the associated risk and protective factors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study from a national database of 168 137 primiparous women with term, singleton, cephalic, vaginal delivery between 2008 and 2014. The main outcome measure was obstetric anal sphincter injury. A multivariate regression model was used to identify risk and protective factors.

RESULTS

Age >19 years, birthweight >4000 g, and operative vaginal delivery were independent risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Mediolateral episiotomy increased the risk for obstetric anal sphincter injuries in spontaneous vaginal birth (number needed to harm 333), whereas it was protective in vacuum delivery (number needed to treat 50). From 2008 to 2014, there was an increase in the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (2.1% vs 3.1%, P < .01), vacuum deliveries (12.1% vs 12.8%, P < .01), and cesarean delivery after labor (17.1% vs 19.4%, P < .01), while forceps deliveries (0.4% vs 0.1%, P < .01) and episiotomy rate decreased (35.9% vs 26.4%, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Episiotomy may be a risk or protective factor depending on the type of episiotomy and the clinical setting in which it is used. Our study supports a restrictive use of mediolateral episiotomy in spontaneous vaginal deliveries. In vacuum deliveries mediolateral episiotomy may help prevent obstetric anal sphincter injuries.

Association between pelvic floor dysfunction, and clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation in primiparous women: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Disorders related to pelvic floor include urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, sexual dysfunction and pelvic pain. Because pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFD) can be diagnosed clinically, imaging techniques serve as auxiliary tools for establishing an accurate diagnosis. The objective is to evaluate the PFD in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and the association between clinical examination and three-dimensional ultrasonography (3DUS).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in a in tertiary maternity. All primiparous women with vaginal deliveries that occurred between January 2013 and December 2015 were invited. Women who attended the invitation underwent detailed anamnesis, questionnaire application, physical examination and endovaginal and endoanal 3DUS. Crude and adjusted predictor factors for PFD were analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty women were evaluated. Sexual dysfunction was the most prevalent PFD (64.6%). When associated with clinical features and PFD, oxytocin use increased by approximately four times the odds of UI (crude OR 4.182, 95% CI 1.149-15.219). During the multivariate analysis, the odds of UI were increased in forceps use by approximately 11 times (adjusted OR 11.552, 95% CI 11.155-115.577). When the clinical and obstetrical predictors for PFD were associated with 3DUS, forceps increased the odds of lesion of the pubovisceral muscle and anal sphincter diagnosed by 3DUS by sixfold (crude OR 6.000, 95% CI 1.172-30.725), and in multivariate analysis forceps again increased the odds of injury by approximately 7 times (adjusted OR 7.778, 95% CI 1.380-43.846).

CONCLUSION

Sexual dysfunction was the most frequent PFD. The use of forceps in primiparous women was associated with a greater chance of UI and pelvic floor muscle damage diagnosed by 3DUS.

Incidence and risk factors of severe lacerations during forceps delivery in a single teaching hospital where simulation training is held annually

AIM

This study was conducted to evaluate the incidence of severe lacerations during forceps delivery and the risk factors associated with such delivery in a hospital where simulation training is held annually.

METHODS

The medical records of 857 women who underwent forceps delivery at term with singleton cephalic presentation from 2010 to 2015 were reviewed. The relationship between clinical characteristics and birth canal trauma was analyzed. Birth canal trauma included third and fourth degree perineal lacerations. Univariable and multivariable models of logistic regression were employed to estimate the raw odds ratio and were adjusted for cofactors with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.

RESULTS

The incidence of severe lacerations was 10.1%. Birth weight, fetal head station, the rate of malrotation and the number of extractions were higher in women with severe lacerations (P < 0.01), whereas the use of obstetric anesthesia was lower in women with such lacerations (P < 0.01). Neither the indication for forceps delivery nor the qualifications of the operator had any influence on the incidence of severe lacerations.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of severe lacerations was relatively low. Risk factors for severe lacerations with forceps delivery were identified as birth weight, fetal head station, malrotation and the number of extractions. Obstetric anesthesia may protect against severe lacerations.

Incidence and risk factors of third- and fourth-degree perineal tears in a single Italian scenario

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate III and IV degree tears rates and related risk factors in a single Italian centre. The secondary goal was to build a predictive model based on identified risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study. All vaginal deliveries from 2011 to 2015 in a single Italian University Hospital were analysed. Univariate analysis was applied to evaluate the overall association between each factor and severe tear. Multivariate logistic regression was used to build a predictive model for the absolute risk of severe tear. We computed a resampling validated measure (AUC) of the predictive accuracy of the model and we provided a nomogram for the risk calculation in clinical practice.

RESULTS

62 out of 10133 patients (0.61%) had a severe perineal tear. Univariate analysis identified gestational age >40 weeks, nulliparity, moderate/severe obesity, oxytocin use in pushing stage, sinciput presentation, instrumental delivery, shoulder dystocia, pushing stage ≥90 min, lithotomy position, birth weight >4 kg, head circumference at birth >34 cm and length at birth >50 cm as risk factors. Multivariate analysis identify moderate/severe obesity (OR = 2.8), instrumental delivery (OR = 2.6) and birth weight (OR = 1.1/hg) as independent risk factors. Using the predicted risk score from the final model (bootstrap-validated AUC 70%), we designed a nomogram for severe perineal tears absolute risk calculation.

CONCLUSION

Moderate/severe obesity, instrumental delivery and foetal weight resulted as independent risk factors for severe obstetrical tears.

Neuraxial labor analgesia is not an independent predictor of perineal lacerations after vaginal delivery of patients with intrauterine fetal demise

INTRODUCTION

The role of neuraxial labor analgesia in perineal trauma following live births is controversial, and no studies have assessed the association in women delivering an intrauterine fetal demise. We evaluated the relationship between neuraxial labor analgesia and perineal laceration in these patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case-control study of women with a diagnosis of fetal death after 20weeks of gestation, a vaginal delivery, and an Apgar score of 0 at delivery, during the period from January 2007 through December 2015. The presence of a perineal laceration and its severity, graded from grade I to IV based on the 2014 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines, was recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 329/422 (78%) patients received neuraxial, and 93/422 (22%) non-neuraxial, labor analgesia. A perineal laceration occurred in 23% in the neuraxial versus 10% in the non-neuraxial analgesia group, a difference of 13% (95% CI of difference 4% to 20%, P=0.005). After adjusting for confounder bias, greater birthweight (OR 4.22, 95% CI 3.00 to 5.92, P<0.001) and lower parity (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.82, P=0.009), but not neuraxial analgesia (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.47 to 3.57, P=0.61) were independent predictors of perineal laceration. The maintenance concentration of bupivacaine did not affect the rate of perineal injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuraxial labor analgesia does not appear to be an independent risk for a perineal laceration in patients with intrauterine fetal demise. Our data suggests that the use of neuraxial analgesia should not raise concern about increased rates of perineal injury.

Practice Bulletin No. 165: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery

Lacerations are common after vaginal birth. Trauma can occur on the cervix, vagina, and vulva, including the labial, periclitoral, and periurethral regions, and the perineum. Most of these lacerations do not result in adverse functional outcomes. Severe perineal lacerations, extending into or through the anal sphincter complex, although less frequent, are more commonly associated with increased risk of pelvic floor injury, fecal and urinary incontinence, pain, and sexual dysfunction with symptoms that may persist or be present many years after giving birth. The purpose of this document is to provide evidence-based guidelines for the prevention, identification, and repair of obstetric lacerations and for episiotomy.

Influence of a pelvic floor training programme to prevent perineal trauma: A quasi-randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

perineal injury is common after birth and may be caused by tears or episiotomy or both. Perineal massage has been shown to prevent episiotomies in primiparous women. On the other hand, pelvic floor exercises might have an influence by shortening the first and second stages of labour in the primigravida.

AIM

the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a pelvic floor training following a birth programme on perineal trauma.

DESIGN

a single-blind quasi-randomized controlled trial with two groups: standard care and intervention.

SETTING

a tertiary, metropolitan hospital in Seville, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

women (n=466) who were 32 weeks pregnant, having a singleton pregnancy and anticipating a normal birth were randomised. Women in the experimental groups were asked to perform a pelvic floor training programme that included: daily perineal massage and pelvic floor exercises from 32 weeks of pregnancy until birth. They were allocated to an intervention group by clusters (antenatal education groups) randomized 1:1. The control group had standard care that did not involve a perineal/pelvic floor intervention. These women were collected in a labour ward at admission 1:3 by midwives.

RESULTS

outcomes were analysed by intention-to-treat. Women assigned to the perineal/pelvic floor intervention showed a 31.63% reduction in episiotomy (50.56% versus 82.19%, p<0.001) and a higher likelihood of having an intact perineum (17.61% versus 6.85%, p<0.003). There were also fewer third (5.18% versus 13.12%, p<0.001) and fourth degree-tears (0.52% versus 2.5%, p<0.001). Women allocated to the intervention group also had less postpartum perineal pain (24.57% versus 36.30%, p<0.001) and required less analgesia in the postnatal period (21.14% versus 30.82%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

a training programme composed of pelvic floor exercises and perineal massage may prevent episiotomies and tears in primiparous women. This programme can be recommended to primiparous women in order to prevent perineal trauma.

KEY CONCLUSION

the pelvic floor programme was associated with significantly lower rates of episiotomies and severe perineal trauma; and higher intact perineum when compared with women who received standard care only.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

the programme is an effective intervention that we recommend to all women at 32nd week of pregnancy to prevent perineal trauma.

Does meperidine analgesia affect the incidence of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery?

PURPOSE

To study whether meperidine analgesia affects the incidence of obstetric lacerations at normal vaginal deliveries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all women with term vertex singleton pregnancies, who underwent normal vaginal deliveries, in a single tertiary hospital, between 2011 and 2015, was performed. The incidence of various obstetric lacerations was compared between deliveries with meperidine analgesia and deliveries with no analgesia. Deliveries with epidural analgesia and instrumental deliveries were excluded. An intravenous infusion of 75 mg of meperidine was administered together with 25 mg of promethazine. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between meperidine analgesia and obstetric lacerations, after controlling for confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, 5227 (91.8%) deliveries with no analgesia and 466 (8.1%) deliveries with meperidine analgesia were included. Meperidine analgesia was associated with a decreased risk of first- and second-degree perineal lacerations (adjusted OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.49-0.81), and a decreased risk of any suturing (adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.59-0.91), after controlling for confounders. Meperidine analgesia did not affect the risk of severe perineal lacerations or episiotomies.

CONCLUSION

Meperidine analgesia may have a protective effect against first- and second-degree perineal lacerations.