Comparison of complications and prolapse recurrence between laparoscopic and vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension for the treatment of vaginal prolapse

Long-Term Costs of Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy Compared to Native Tissue Vaginal Repair With Concomitant Hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the long-term costs of hysterectomy with minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (MISCP) versus uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) for primary uterovaginal prolapse repair.

DESIGN

A hospital-based decision analysis model was built using TreeAge Pro (TreeAge Software Inc, Williamstown, MA). Those with prolapse were modeled to undergo either vaginal hysterectomy with USLS or minimally invasive total hysterectomy with sacrocolpopexy (MISCP). We modeled the chance of complications of the index procedure, prolapse recurrence with the option for surgical retreatment, complications of the salvage procedure, and possible second prolapse recurrence. The primary outcome was cost of the surgical strategy. The proportion of patients living with prolapse after treatment was the secondary outcome.

SETTING

Tertiary center for urogynecology.

PATIENTS

Female patients undergoing surgical repair by the same team for primary uterovaginal prolapse.

INTERVENTIONS

Comparison analysis of estimated long-term costs was performed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Our primary outcome showed that a strategy of undergoing MISCP as the primary index procedure cost $19 935 and that undergoing USLS as the primary index procedure cost $15 457, a difference of $4478. Furthermore, 21.1% of women in the USLS group will be living with recurrent prolapse compared to 6.2% of MISCP patients. Switching from USLS to MISCP to minimize recurrence risk would cost $30 054 per case of prolapse prevented. Additionally, a surgeon would have to perform 6.7 cases by MISCP instead of USLS in order to prevent 1 patient from having recurrent prolapse.

CONCLUSION

The higher initial costs of MISCP compared to USLS persist in the long term after factoring in recurrence and complication rates, though more patients who undergo USLS live with prolapse recurrence.

Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

Uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) is one of the most frequently used operations for the restoration of apical support in women with uterovaginal prolapse. However, existing studies are inconclusive as to whether and which surgical access route is superior. The aim of the present meta-analysis is tentatively to compare the efficiency and the postoperative complications of laparoscopic USLS (L-USLS) and vaginal USLS (V-USLS), highlighting that current evidence remains inconclusive regarding the superiority of either surgical access route.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a systematic literature review of 5 major databases (Medline, Scopus, Google Scholar Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Clinicaltrials.gov) from inception till April 2023.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

No language restrictions were applied. All comparative studies that compared L-USLS and V-USLS for the management of women with uterovaginal prolapse were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data from 6 retrospective cohort studies on 856 patients were extracted and analyzed. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions tool and ranged between moderate to serious. The pooled results suggest that L-USLS was associated with a potentially decreased incidence of ureteral compromise (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.89; p = .04) and seemingly lower objective (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.23-0.97; p = .04) and subjective recurrence rates (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.23-0.92; p = .03). There were no significant differences between the rates of postoperative pain from USLS sutures, postoperative pelvic hematomas, the suture exposure/granulation tissue formation, and the prolapse recurrence retreatment among the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis indicates that L-USLS is possibly associated with significantly fewer ureteral compromise rates and decreased subjective and objective recurrences rates compared to V-USLS. Nevertheless, given the limitations in data quality and heterogeneity of the included studies, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Large-scale randomized studies are essential to more definitively determine the relative merits of the laparoscopic versus vaginal approach.

Effects of Obesity on Urogynecologic Prolapse Surgery Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on outcomes of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in patients from various body mass index (BMI) categories to determine the association between obesity and surgical outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to April 12, 2022; ClinicalTrials.gov was searched in September 2022 (PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022326255). Randomized and nonrandomized studies of urogynecologic POP surgery outcomes were accepted in which categories of BMI or obesity were compared.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

In total, 9,037 abstracts were screened; 759 abstracts were identified for full-text screening, and 31 articles were accepted for inclusion and data were extracted.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Studies were extracted for participant information, intervention, comparator, and outcomes, including subjective outcomes, objective outcomes, and complications. Outcomes were compared among obesity categories (eg, BMI 30-34.9, 35-40, higher than 40), and meta-analysis was performed among different surgical approaches. Individual studies reported varying results as to whether obesity affects surgical outcomes. By meta-analysis, obesity (BMI 30 or higher) is associated with an increased odds of objective prolapse recurrence after vaginal prolapse repair (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% CI, 1.14-1.67) and after prolapse repair from any surgical approach (OR 1.31, 95% CI, 1.12-1.53) and with complications such as mesh exposure after both vaginal and laparoscopic POP repair (OR 2.10, 95% CI, 1.01-4.39).

CONCLUSION

Obesity is associated with increased likelihood of prolapse recurrence and mesh complications after POP repair.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022326255.

Obesity and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery: An ACS NSQIP Study

IMPORTANCE

Obesity is steadily increasing in the United States and is a risk factor for many medical and surgical complications. Literature is limited regarding obesity as an independent risk factor for perioperative complications after reconstructive pelvic surgery (RPS).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the association of obesity on 30-day perioperative complications after RPS.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a database study comparing perioperative complications after RPS of obese versus nonobese patients using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Patients who underwent surgery for uterovaginal or vaginal vault prolapse were selected, and perioperative outcomes were compared between obese and nonobese patients. Obesity was defined as a body mass index ≥30 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).

RESULTS

A total of 13,302 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study; 4,815 patients were obese, whereas 8,487 were nonobese. The overall rate of any 30-day postoperative complication was 6.8%, and the rate of complications did not differ between groups. Superficial and organ space surgical site infections were significantly higher in the obese cohort, whereas nonobese patients were more likely to receive a blood transfusion. A multivariable logistic regression model was performed with variables that were statistically significant on bivariate analysis and deemed clinically significant. Variables included obesity, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, current smoker, diabetes, hypertension, operative time, colpopexy, and obliterative procedure. After controlling for potential confounding factors, obesity was not associated with any 30-day postoperative complications after pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

CONCLUSION

Obesity was not associated with 30-day postoperative complications after RPS after controlling for possible confounding variables.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension in patients with pelvic organ prolapse

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using a meta-analysis method.

METHODS

All articles about LUSLS published in English from Jan. 2010 to Jan. 2020 were retrieved using a computer from search engines, including PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and Chinese Medical Journals. Meta-analysis was performed by two evaluators using RevMan 5.3 software according to the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total of five studies were finally included, with 361 LUSLS cases and 361 control cases. LUSLS group showed a shorter operation duration (SMD-1.96; 95% CI = -3.90- -0.03; P = 0.05), more POP-quantification system (Q) (I) (SMD1.64; 95% CI = 1.05-2.56; P = 0.03), than the control group, with significant differences. There was no difference in the complication incidence, hospital stay, POP-Q>=II between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

LUSLS was a safe and effective treatment for POP. Patients had higher postoperative satisfaction, shorter operation duration and satisfactory outcome. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are required in the future to make the results of the meta-analysis more accurate.

The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) is a technique to correct apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) by shortening the uterosacral ligaments with sutures.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review with meta-analysis of the effectiveness and safety of LUSLS as treatment for apical POP.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed and Cochrane search using 'pelvic organ prolapse', 'laparoscopy' and 'uterosacral', including synonyms.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All articles in English presenting outcome of an original series of women with LUSLS as treatment of apical POP. Case reports were excluded.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Study enrollment was performed by two reviewers. Our primary outcome measures were objective and subjective effectiveness of the procedure. Secondary outcome measures regarded complications and recurrence. Bias was assessed with the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Of 138 hits, 13 studies were included with 933 LUSLS patients. The average follow-up was 22 months. All were nonrandomised cohort studies. The pooled anatomic success rate is 90% for all LUSLS procedures (95% confidence interval [CI] 83.3-95.5). LUSLS with hysterectomy resulted in an anatomic success rate of 96.6% (95% CI 87.5-100) and LUSLS with uterus preservation 83.4% (95% CI 67.7-94.6). The pooled subjective cure rate was 90.5% (95% CI 81.9-96.5). The rate of major complications was 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (with or without uterus preservation) seems to be an effective and safe treatment for women with apical POP, but long-term prospective trials and randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability

Introduction

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a widespread condition affecting from 40% to 60% of women. Reconstructive vaginal surgeries are the most commonly performed procedures to treat POP. Among those, uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS), which is usually performed transvaginally, preserves pelvic statics and dynamics and appears to be an effective method. Laparoscopic USLS is a valid alternative to vaginal approach, and the aim of our review is to confirm its safety and feasibility and to compare clinical outcomes among the procedures.

Materials and methods

Following the recommendations in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, we systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2022. We made no restriction on the publication year nor on the country. Data about POP-Q recurrence rate (RR), intraoperative and postoperative complications (graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification), readmission rate, and reoperation rate were collected and analyzed. We used comparative studies for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria: two articles were non-comparative retrospective observational studies, three more articles were comparative studies where laparoscopic USLS was confronted with other surgical techniques (only data of laparoscopic USLS were analyzed), and four were comparative retrospective cohort studies between laparoscopic and vaginal USLS procedures. The comparative studies were enrolled in meta-analysis. Patients were analyzed concerning perioperative risks and the risk of recurrence. The meta-analysis highlighted that there was no clear inferiority of one technique over the other.

Discussion

Laparoscopic USLS is a technique with a low complication rate and low recurrence rate. Indeed, laparoscopic procedure allows better identification of anatomical landmarks and access to retroperitoneum. Moreover, efficacy over time and durability of Laparoscopic (LPS) USLS was also observed. However, these data should be weighed in light of the length of follow-up, which was in a very short range. Further, focused and prospective studies will be necessary to confirm this finding.

Surgical outcomes in patients aged 70 years and older following uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparative study

PURPOSE

The number of elderly patients bothered by pelvic organ prolapse symptoms is growing rapidly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between age and surgical outcomes in women undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including women who underwent uterosacral ligament suspension between 2010 and 2020. The cohort was divided into two groups: (1) Patients 70 years or older; (2) Patients under the age of 70. Outcome measures included clinical, anatomical, and composite outcomes as well as patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

A total of 271 patients were included in the final analysis. Of them 209 patients were under age 70 and 62 patients 70 years or older. Mean age was 59 ± 6 vs. 73 ± 3 for the young and elderly age groups, respectively. Clinical success was high for both groups, reaching 94% vs. 89% for elderly and young patients, respectively (p = 0.34). Anatomical and composite outcome success were higher in the young age group (76% vs. 56%, p < 0.01 and 70% vs. 54%, p = 0.02, respectively); however, following multivariate analysis these differences were no longer statistically significant. Following multivariate logistic regression analysis for the dependent parameter of anatomical success, increased pre-operative genital hiatus and vaginal surgical route were associated with anatomical failure while performing a concomitant posterior colporrhaphy increased likelihood for anatomical success.

CONCLUSION

Women over the age of 70 undergoing uterosacral ligament suspension for treatment of apical prolapse have comparable outcomes to younger patients.

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review

OBJECTIVES

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of the vaginal apex for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has gained popularity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate perioperative outcomes and complications, subjective and objective success rates and recurrence rates in women undergoing this surgical procedure.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic literature search was performed in December 2021. The critical appraisal skills program (CASP) was used to assess the methodological quality of the selected studies. The Clavien-Dindo (CD) scale and the Satava scale were used to classify periprocedural complications. Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations while categorical were expressed as percentages of the whole group. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

26 articles were selected and analysed, with a total population of 1401 patients. Anatomical and subjective success rates after LUSLS ranged from 79% and 100% and from 76.2% to 100% respectively. The re-operation rate varied from 2% to 4.5% in the largest cohorts. The overall complication rate was 13.6%, however grade III CD complications occurred only in 1% of patients. Ureteral complications were described in only 2 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

LUSLS represent a safe and effective technique for vaginal apex resuspension in women with POP. Further larger prospective randomized studies are required to confirm these data.

In-plane and out-of-plane deformations of gilt utero-sacral ligaments

The uterosacral ligaments (USLs) are supportive structures of the uterus and apical vagina. The mechanical function of these ligaments within the pelvic floor is crucial not only in normal physiological conditions but also in reconstructive surgeries for pelvic organ prolapse. Discrepancies in their anatomical and histological description exist in the literature, but such discrepancies are likely due to large variations of these structures. This makes mechanical testing very challenging, requiring the development of advanced methods for characterizing their mechanical properties. This study proposes the use of planar biaxial testing, digital image correlation (DIC), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) to quantify the deformations of the USLs, both in-plane and out-of-plane. Using the gilts as an animal model, the USLs were found to deform significantly less in their main direction (MD) of in vivo loading than in the direction perpendicular to it (PD) at increasing equibiaxial stresses. Under constant equibiaxial loading, the USLs deform over time equally, at comparable rates in both the MD and PD. The thickness of the USLs decreases as the equibiaxial loading increases but, under constant equibiaxial loading, the thickness increases in some specimens and decreases in others. These findings could contribute to the design of new mesh materials that augment the support function of USLs as well as noninvasive diagnostic tools for evaluating the integrity of the USLs.

Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs. Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Case-Control Study

Introduction

Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy is the gold standard technique for apical prolapse correction but it is a technically challenging procedure with rare but severe morbidity. Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension could be a valid technically easier alternative using native tissue.

Material and Methods

In the period from 2015 to 2018, 600 women were submitted to laparoscopic sacral colpopexy while 150 to laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in three Italian urogynecology referral centers. We enrolled women with apical prolapse stage ≥2 alone or multicompartment descensus. To reduce allocation bias, we performed a propensity matched analysis. Women undergoing laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension surgery were matched 1:2 to women undergoing laparoscopic sacral colpopexy. The cumulative proportion of relapse-free women in time was analyzed by the Kaplan–Meier method. The primary objective of this multicenter case-control retrospective study was to compare the recurrence rate while the secondary objectives were to compare feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Results

Three hundred and nine women were enrolled (103 laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension; 206 laparoscopic sacral colpopexy). Median operatory time was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension group (P = 0.0001). No statistically significative difference was found in terms of estimated blood loss, admission time, intraoperative, and major early postoperative complications, postoperative pelvic pain, dyspareunia and de novo stress urinary incontinence. Surgical approach was the only independent risk factor for prolapse recurrence (RR = 6.013 [2.965–12.193], P = 0.0001). The objective cure rate was higher in the laparoscopic sacral colpopexy group (93.7 vs. 68%, 193/206 vs. 70/103, P = 0.0001) with a highly reduced risk of recurrence (RR = 5.430 [1.660–17.765]). Median follow up was 22 months.

Conclusion

Both techniques are safe, feasible, and effective. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy remains the best choice in treatment of multicompartment and advanced pelvic organ prolapse while laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension could be appropriate for moderate and isolated apical prolapse when laparoscopic sacral colpopexy is not suitable for the patient or to prevent prolapse in women at high risk at the time of the hysterectomy.

Mechanics of Uterosacral Ligaments: Current Knowledge, Existing Gaps, and Future Directions

The uterosacral ligaments (USLs) are important anatomical structures that support the uterus and apical vagina within the pelvis. As these structures are over-stretched, become weak, and exhibit laxity, pelvic floor disorders such as pelvic organ prolapse occur. Although several surgical procedures to treat pelvic floor disorders are directed toward the USLs, there is still a lot that is unknown about their function. This manuscript presents a review of the current knowledge on the mechanical properties of the USLs. The anatomy, microstructure, and clinical significance of the USLs are first reviewed. Then, the results of published experimental studies on the in vivo and ex vivo, uniaxial and biaxial tensile tests are compiled. Based on the existing findings, research gaps are identified and future research directions are discussed. The purpose of this exhaustive review is to help new researchers navigate scientific literature on the mechanical properties of the USLs. The use of these structures remains very popular in reconstructive surgeries that restore and augment the support of pelvic organs, especially as synthetic surgical mesh implants continue to be highly controversial.

Quality of life recovery after laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension: a single centre observational study

OBJECTIVE

Laparoscopic high uterosacral ligament suspension (l-HUSLS) is a laparoscopic-transposed vaginal technique for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Nowadays data regarding quality of life and sexual functions in patients who underwent l-HUSLS for pelvic organ prolapse are few and generic with most of the study investigating the anatomical outcome. For these reasons, the aim of our study is to evaluate these subjective outcomes in women undergoing this surgical procedure with the support of validated questionnaires.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective study with the primary aim of analysing the quality of life, sexual function, patient satisfaction rates and anatomical outcome among patients who underwent l-HUSLS in our institution. The SPSS Version 26.0 for Windows (Statistical package for the social studies, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients underwent l-HUSLS between 2016 and 2018. All patients had a high grade of apical prolapse. No intraoperative and major postoperative complications were registered. The median follow-up was 24 months (24-48). PGI-I score was 1-2 in 55 (91.6 %) women. We observed a significant improvement of EQ-5D index and VAS scores from the baseline to the 2 years follow-up: from 0.72 (0.67-1) to 0.91 (0.79-1) and from 50 (30-90) to 70 (50-100) respectively (p = 0.000). All women showed a statistically significant amelioration of FSDS and ICIQ-SF scores. Anatomical success rate after 24 months was 83.7 %.

CONCLUSIONS

l-HUSLS appears to be a safe, feasible and effective treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse with high rates of patient self-reported cure.

Hysterectomy Versus Hysteropexy at the Time of Native Tissue Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine whether a hysterectomy at the time of native tissue pelvic organ prolapse repair is cost-effective for the prevention of endometrial cancer.

METHODS

We created a decision analysis model using TreeAge Pro. We modeled prolapse recurrence after total vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension (TVH-USLS) versus sacrospinous ligament fixation hysteropexy (SSLF-HPXY). We modeled incidence and diagnostic evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding, including risk of endometrial pathology and diagnosis or death from endometrial cancer. Modeled costs included those associated with the index procedure, subsequent prolapse repair, endometrial biopsy, pelvic ultrasound, hysteroscopy, dilation and curettage, and treatment of endometrial cancer.

RESULTS

TVH-USLS costs US $587.61 more than SSLF-HPXY per case of prolapse. TVH-USLS prevents 1.1% of women from experiencing postmenopausal bleeding and its diagnostic workup. It prevents 0.95% of women from undergoing subsequent major surgery for the treatment of either prolapse recurrence or suspected endometrial cancer. Using our model, it costs US $2,698,677 to prevent one cancer death by performing TVH-USLS. As this is lower than the value of a statistical life, it is cost-effective to perform TVH-USLS for cancer prevention. Multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses showed that changes to input variables would not significantly change outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

TVH-USLS increased costs but reduced postmenopausal bleeding and subsequent major surgery compared with SSLF-HPXY. Accounting for these differences, TVH-USLS was a cost-effective approach for the prevention of endometrial cancer. Uterine preservation/removal at the time of prolapse repair should be based on the woman's history and treatment priorities, but cancer prevention should be one aspect of this decision.

Is absorbable suture superior to permanent suture for uterosacral ligament suspension?

AIMS

The aims of this study were to compare surgical results and suture-related complications after uterosacral ligament suspension (USLS) with absorbable suture (AS) vs permanent suture (PS).

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, clinicalTrial.gov, and Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles that compared AS with PS for USLS. The primary outcomes were surgical success rate and suture-related complications (suture exposure/erosion and suture removal). Review Manager 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was applied to conduct all analyses.

RESULTS

Four articles involving 647 patients were eventually included. Our findings demonstrated that AS had a similar surgical success rates in comparison with PS (RR = 1.00; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06) and that no significant differences in anatomic failure rates were noted between two groups (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 0.65-1.86). Subgroup analyses in anatomic failure revealed no statistical differences in apical prolapse ≥1/2 TVL (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.48-1.75), recurrent prolapse beyond the hymen (RR = 1.18; 95% CI, 0.68-2.04), as well as in recurrent anterior, posterior or apical prolapse (P = .14, P = .08, P = .09, respectively). However, AS group indicated a lower risk in suture exposure/erosion (RR = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.63) and lower suture removal rate (RR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.18-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Due to similar surgical results, less suture exposure/erosion and less suture removal, the current data supported that AS is as effective as PS, but with a better safety profile.

National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the morbidity of vaginal versus laparoscopic hysterectomy when performed with uterosacral ligament suspension.

DESIGN

Retrospective propensity-score matched cohort study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.

PATIENTS

We included all patients who had undergone uterosacral ligament suspension and concurrent total vaginal hysterectomy (TVH-USLS) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH-USLS) from 2010 to 2015. We excluded those who underwent laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, other surgical procedures for apical pelvic organ prolapse, or had gynecologic malignancy.

INTERVENTIONS

We compared 30-day complication rates in patients who underwent TVH-USLS versus TLH-USLS in both the total study population and a propensity score matched cohort.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The study population consisted of 3,349 patients who underwent TVH-USLS and 484 who underwent TLH-USLS. Patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a significantly higher composite complication rate (11.4% vs 6.4%, odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 1.3-2.8; p <.01) and a higher serious complication rate (5.6% vs 3.1%, OR 1.8, 1.1-3.1; p = .02), which excluded urinary tract infection and superficial surgical site infection. The propensity score analysis was performed, and patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio between the TVH-USLS group and the TLH-USLS group. In the matched cohort, patients who underwent TVH-USLS had a higher composite complication rate than those who underwent TLH-USLS (10.3% vs 6.4%, OR 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.7; p = .04), whereas the rate of serious complications did not differ between the groups (4.3% vs 3.1%, OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7-2.8; p = .4). On multivariate logistic regression, TVH-USLS remained an independent predictor of composite complications (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI, 1.0-2.6; p = .04) but not serious complications (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI, 0.7-2.8; p = .3).

CONCLUSION

In this large national cohort, TVH-USLS was associated with a higher composite complication rate than TLH-USLS, largely secondary to an increased rate of urinary tract infection. After matching, the groups had similar rates of serious complications. These data suggest that TLH-USLS should be viewed as a safe alternative to TVH-USLS.

Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Due to recent concerns over the use of synthetic mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery, there has been a renewed interest in the utilization of non-synthetic repairs for pelvic organ prolapse. The purpose of this review is to review the current literature regarding pelvic organ prolapse repairs performed without the utilization of synthetic mesh.

RECENT FINDINGS

Native tissue repairs provide a durable surgical option for pelvic organ prolapse. Based on recent findings of recently performed randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up, transvaginal native tissue repair continues to play a role in the management of pelvic organ prolapse without the added risk associated with synthetic mesh. In 2019, the FDA called for manufacturers of synthetic mesh for transvaginal mesh to stop selling and distributing their products in the USA. Native tissue and non-synthetic pelvic organ prolapse repairs provide an efficacious alternative without the added risk inherent to the utilization of transvaginal mesh. A recent, multicenter, randomized clinical trial demonstrated no clear advantage to the utilization of synthetic mesh. Furthermore, transvaginal native tissue repairs have demonstrated good long-term efficacy, particularly when anatomic success is not the sole metric used to define surgical success.

Comparison of laparoscopic techniques for apical organ prolapse repair - a systematic review of the literature

AIMS

Apical defect is a pelvic organ prolapse disorder, with 5%-15% prevalence. The aim of the study was to investigate methods of laparoscopic repair of apical defect and compare them with other techniques (open, vaginal, and robotic).

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases using the following key words: apical prolapse and treatment procedures. The search was limited by using the humans filters. Only articles published in English between 2010 and 2018 were considered. Two independent authors reviewed the publications for inclusion on the basis of the following criteria: (a) use of laparoscopic techniques, and (b) apical support loss as indication for surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 1002 papers were initially identified; 24 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Four main laparoscopic procedures were found. The reported anatomical success rate (POP-Q < II stage) was 77%-100%, with patient satisfaction for pectopexy, laparoscopic sacropexy (LS), lateral ligament suspension and laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension (LUSLS) of 96.4%-97.6%, 71.0%-100%, 66.7%-87.8%, and 95%-95.5%, respectively. Major complications included hemorrhage, bladder, ureter, and/or bowel injuries were rare. Prolapse recurrences after LUSLS and LS were reported in 13.2% and 10.4% of patients, respectively; with reoperation rate for LS 2.2%-12.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Most studies reported anatomical and subjective outcomes, with follow-up ranging from 1 month to >7 years. Success rates for laparoscopic and abdominal corrections of apical defect were similar; laparoscopy was superior in terms of perioperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, and recovery.

Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament colpopexy for apical support in addition to hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse

AIM

To evaluate the perioperative complications and the anatomical outcomes of our laparoscopic uterosacral ligament (USL) colpopexy, which is a novel laparoscopic technique for the management of uterine prolapse. The objective was to report on outcome after 2 years of a technique using laparoscopic USL colpopexy.

METHODS

A total of 152 uterine prolapse patients underwent laparoscopic USL colpopexy from May 2013 to April 2015. We described the surgical technique and performed a retrospective analysis of this laparoscopic technique. Patients underwent standardized assessment and examination using pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) score. The dependent values of Ba point (bladder), C point (vaginal cuff) and Bp point (rectum) were recorded preoperatively, and at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of postoperative examination. Pre/postoperative data were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Mean age, operative time and amount of hemorrhage were 68.2 ± 7.5 years, 118.3 ± 36.4 min and 60.5 ± 73.3 mL, respectively. Overall recurrent prolapse, which was defined as POP-Q stage II or higher, was noted in 29 patients (19%). However, only 2 patients presented recurrent rectocele among 51 patients with preoperative POP-Q stage II of uterine prolapse alone (recurrence rate; 3.9%). The pre/postoperative average POP-Q scores were -0.2/-2.7 cm (P < 0.05) at Ba point, -1.9/-5.1 cm (P < 0.05) at C point and -2.4/-2.3 cm (P = 0.06) at Bp point.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic visualization of uterosacral ligaments may result in safe colpopexy. Our results show this will be a useful procedure for apical support as native tissue repair.

Uterosacral vault suspension (USLS) at the time of hysterectomy: laparoscopic versus vaginal approach

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To compare laparoscopic and vaginal approaches to uterosacral ligament vault suspension (USLS) by perioperative data, short-term complications, rates of successful concomitant adnexal surgery and procedural efficacy.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of USLS procedures performed at the time of hysterectomy at a tertiary care center over a 3-year period. Patient demographics, surgical data, concomitant adnexal procedures and complications were abstracted from a surgical database and compared using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate. Validated questionnaires (POPDI-6, UDI-6, PROMIS) were used to collect information on recurrence and long-term complications. Patients were analyzed according to both intention-to-treat analysis based on the intended approach and the completed route of surgery to deal with intraoperative conversions.

RESULTS

Two hundred six patients met the criteria for inclusion; 152 underwent vaginal USLS (V-USLS) and 54 laparoscopic USLS (L-USLS). No statistically significant differences in mean case time, postoperative length of stay or perioperative infection were found. While no ureteric obstructions occurred in the L-USLS group, in the V-USLS group 14 (9%) obstructions occurred (p = 0.023). Postoperative urinary retention was higher with V-USLS (31% vs. 15%, p = 0.024). Rates of successfully completed adnexal surgery differed (56% vs. 98%, p < 0.001) in favor of L-USLS. Patient-reported symptomatic recurrence of prolapse was higher in the V-USLS group (41% vs. 24%, p = 0.046); despite this, re-treatment did not differ between the groups (0% vs. 7%, p = 0.113).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative case time and complications did not differ between approaches. However, rates of completed adnexal surgery were significantly higher in the laparoscopic group, which could influence surgical decisions concerning approaches to prolapse surgery.

Platelet rich plasma as a minimally invasive approach to uterine prolapse

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a major health problem that affects many women with potentially severe physical and psychological impact as well as impact on their daily activities, and quality of life. Several surgical techniques have been proposed for the treatment of POP. The FDA has published documents that refer to concerns about the use of synthetic meshes for the treatment of prolapse, in view of the severe complications that may occur. These led to hesitancy in use of these meshes and partial increase in use of other biological grafts such as allografts and xenografts. Although there seems to be an increasing tendency to use grafts in pelvic floor reconstructive procedures due to lower risks of erosion than synthetic meshes, there are inconclusive data to support the routine use of biological grafts in pelvic organ prolapse treatment. In light of these observations new strategies are needed for the treatment of prolapse. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) is extremely rich in growth factors and cytokines, which regulate tissue reconstruction and has been previously used in orthopaedics and plastic surgery. To date, however, it has never been used in urogynaecology and there is no evidence to support or oppose its use in women who suffer from POP, due to uterine ligament defects. PRP is a relatively inexpensive biological material and easily produced directly from patients' blood and is, thus, superior to synthetic materials in terms of potential adverse effects such as foreign body reaction. In the present article we summarize the existing evidence, which supports the conduct of animal experimental and clinical studies to elucidate the potential role of PRP in treating POP by restoring the anatomy and function of ligament support.

Demonstration of a box-stitch technique for laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension

AIM

We demonstrate a novel box stitch technique of laparoscopic post-hysterectomy uterosacral ligament suspension for apical prolapse in restorative pelvic reconstructive surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We present a case of a 58yo female with symptomatic stage III pelvic organ prolapse with a history of a total abdominal hysterectomy 30 years prior. She strongly desired the usage of no synthetic or biologic mesh for her restorative surgical repair. This video provides a step-by-step guide on how to perform a laparoscopic box stitch as a technique for uterosacral ligament suspension as an apical native tissue option for patients with the need for post hysterectomy apical prolapse.

CONCLUSION

This video demonstrates a novel box-stitch technique of laparoscopic post-hysterectomy uterosacral ligament suspension as a native tissue option for minimally invasive reconstructive surgery. The procedure is a reasonable option to address apical prolapse in patients who do not desire or who are unable to have synthetic or biologic mesh placed for restorative reconstructive prolapse surgery.