Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: operative times and efficiency in a high-volume female pelvic medicine and laparoscopic surgery practice

Prospective International Multicenter Pelvic Floor Study: Short-Term Follow-Up and Clinical Findings for Combined Pectopexy and Native Tissue Repair

Efforts to use traditional native tissue strategies and reduce the use of meshes have been made in several countries. Combining native tissue repair with sufficient mesh applied apical repair might provide a means of effective treatment. The study group did perform and publish a randomized trial focusing on the combination of traditional native tissue repair with pectopexy or sacrocolpopexy and observed no severe or hitherto unknown risks for patients (Noé G.K. J Endourol 2015;29(2):210–215). The short-term follow-up of this international multicenter study carried out now is presented in this article. Material and Methods: Eleven clinics and 13 surgeons in four European counties participated in the trial. In order to ensure a standardized approach and obtain comparable data, all surgeons were obliged to follow a standardized approach for pectopexy, focusing on the area of fixation and the use of a prefabricated mesh (PVDF PRP 3 × 15 Dynamesh). The mesh was solely used for apical repair. All other clinically relevant defects were treated with native tissue repair. Colposuspension or TVT were used for the treatment of incontinence. Data were collected independently for 14 months on a secured server; 501 surgeries were registered and evaluated. Two hundred and sixty-four patients out of 479 (55.1%) returned for the physical examination and interview after 12–18 months. Main Outcome and Results: The mean duration of follow-up was 15 months. The overall success of apical repair was rated positively by 96.9%, and the satisfaction score was rated positively by 95.5%. A positive general recommendation was expressed by 95.1% of patients. Pelvic pressure was reduced in 95.2%, pain in 98.0%, and urgency in 86.0% of patients. No major complications, mesh exposure, or mesh complication occurred during the follow-up period. Conclusion: In clinical routine, pectopexy and concomitant surgery, mainly using native tissue approaches, resulted in high satisfaction rates and favorable clinical findings. The procedure may also be recommended for use by general urogynecological practitioners with experience in laparoscopy.

Prospective international multicenter pectopexy trial: Interim results and findings post surgery

The technique of laparoscopic pectopexy was published in 2010. A subsequent randomized trial focused on pectopexy versus sacropexy revealed no new risks for patients and significant advantages in terms of operating time and de novo defecation disorders compared to sacrocolpopexy. The present international multicenter trial was performed to evaluate the applicability of the technique in clinical routine.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Eleven clinics and 13 surgeons in four European counties participated in the trial. To ensure a standardized approach and obtain comparable data, all surgeons followed the same rules in placing the apical tape, no further mesh was used. Data were collected for 14 months on a secured server; 501 surgeries were documented and evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients treated at the leading center (2 surgeons) contributed 44 % of the patient population. We made a distinction between high-volume (48-135 surgeries annually) (n = 4), intermediate-volume (28-37 surgeries annually) (n = 4), and low-volume (7-22 surgeries annually) (n = 5) surgeons. 97.3 % of the patients (n = 501) had delivered children; 5.6 % had had a Caesarian section. 29.7 % of the patients had undergone a hysterectomy. The operating time for pectopexy was less than 60 min in 79 % of cases. The procedures were completed in less than 159 min in 71 % of cases. Severe complications (n = 5) included four cases of organ damage (related to concomitant surgeries or adhesions) and one case of relevant bleeding. De novo incontinence was registered in two cases and voiding dysfunction in three. No intestinal obstruction or defecation disorder was observed. Two complicated infections were noted. Urinary infection occurred in 2 % of patients.

CONCLUSION

In clinical routine severe complications occurred in 1 %. The latter were unrelated to pectopexy, but occurred due to concomitant procedures or adhesions. The overall operating time as well as the operating time for pectopexy were similar to those reported in published studies on sacrocolpopexy.

Current Treatments for Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions

As global population aging, the issue of pelvic floor dysfunctions becomes increasingly. Millions of women were affected every year. The treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction has evolved in the past decade. This review aims to provide the current information on the treatment for female pelvic floor dysfunction, including pelvic organ prolapse (POP), urinary, fecal incontinence (FI), and myofascial pelvic pain among women. We used PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to search for studies that were related to pelvic floor dysfunction regarding the POP, urinary, FI, and treatments. The development of laparoscopic surgery and synthetic and biological materials for pelvic floor reconstructive surgery were summarized. The surgical outcomes and complications of different pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries were compared. New devices for FI and the potential modified pelvic floor reconstructive surgery were also discussed here. Female pelvic medicine will continue to evolve for better treatment in the future. The pelvic floor reconstructive surgery tends to be minimally invasive approach with synthetic graft use.

[LSC (LAPAROSCOPIC SACROCOLPOPEXY) VERSUS UPHOLD TYPE TVM: A CASE CONTROL STUDY]

(Objective) The comparative analysis of post-surgery condition of lower urinary tract symptoms of LSC and Uphold-type TVM. (Methods) Since August 2015, our hospital introduced LSC and launched Uphold-type TVM in May 2017. 25 cases were examined by December 2017. In comparison with 37 cases of LSC conducted simultaneously, OABSS, IPSS, ICIQ-SF as well as uroflowmetry and residual urine measurement were performed with focus on perioperative complications and postoperative (3 months) lower urinary tract symptoms. As can be observed from the patient background, the average age of subject patients were close to 77 years old for TVM group, 70 years old for LSC group. LSC group showed a tendency to be observed among younger patients. (Result) In Stage II of Pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) most of the mild cases (8 cases in TVM group and 3 cases in LSC group) existied. The type of pelvic organ prolapse (most protruding part) was bladder. Many cystoceles in the TVM group (15 cases in the TVM group and 10 cases in the LSC group) were observed. The average operation time was 115 minutes in the TVM group and 214 minutes in the LSC group which was longer. The average bleeding amount was 54 ml in the TVM group and 10 ml in the LSC group, which was quite small. For the intraoperative complication, in 2 cases bleeding volume 100 ml or more were observed in the TVM group. Bladder injury was found in 1 case. (Conclusion) Regarding postoperative complications, one case of vaginal erosion in TVM group, one case of port suture failure in LSC group, one case of de novo OAB were observed respectively. OABSS, total urinary urgency, IPSS, residual urine were improved in both groups. Both types of surgery are expected to improve lower urinary symptoms and considered to be a useful tool for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.