A national population-based cohort study of urethral injection therapy for female stress and mixed urinary incontinence: the Danish Urogynaecological Database, 2007–2011

Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is defined by the International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) and International Continence Society as the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine associated with urgency and also with exertion, effort, sneezing or coughing. It therefore implies the coexistence of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MUI is a heterogeneous diagnosis that requires an assessment of its individual components of SUI and UUI. Management requires an individualised approach to the symptom components. The aim of this review is to identify the assessment/investigations and management options for MUI.

METHODS

A working subcommittee from the IUGA Research & Development (R&D) Committee was created and volunteers invited from the IUGA membership. A literature review was performed to provide guidance focused on the recommended assessment and management of MUI. The document was then evaluated by the entire IUGA R&D Committee and IUGA Board of Directors and revisions made. The final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion.

RESULTS

The R&D Committee MUI opinion paper provides guidance on the assessment and management of women with MUI and summarises the evidence-based recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed urinary incontinence is a complex problem and successful management requires alleviation of both the stress and urge components. Care should be individualised based on patient preferences. Further research is needed to guide patients in setting goals and to determine which component of MUI to treat first. The evidence for many of the surgical/procedural treatment options for MUI are limited and needs to be explored in more detail.

Combination therapy with botulinum toxin and bulking agent-An efficient, sustainable, and safe method to treat elderly women with mixed urinary incontinence

Aims

To evaluate the efficacy, sustainability and safety of combined botulinum toxin and polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAHG) therapy to treat urgency and stress components of therapy‐refractory mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) in an elderly study population.

Methods

Fifty‐five women with therapy‐refractory MUI were treated with botulinum toxin and PAHG in one surgical procedure. Urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) outcomes were separately assessed after 4 and 12 months by objective UUI episodes/24 h and cough test, subjective impact of UUI and SUI on quality of life, and subjective International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire‐Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ‐UI SF). MUI outcome was calculated by combining UUI and SUI outcomes. Complications were monitored throughout the study.

Results

At 4 months, objective cure rates were 73%, 53%, and 42%, and subjective cure rates were 71%, 52%, and 50% for SUI, UUI, and MUI. At 12 months, objective cure rates were 73%, 56%, 50% and subjective cure rates were 78%, 42%, and 40% for SUI, UUI, and MUI. The ICIQ‐UI SF score decreased by 9.0 and 8.7 points after 4 and 12 months. All complications were transient and included 22% clean intermittent catheterization immediately after surgery, 33% postvoid residual volumes >100 ml at 14 days, and 13% symptomatic urinary tract infection within the first postoperative month.

Conclusions

The combination of botulinum toxin and PAHG is effective, sustainable and safe to treat therapy‐refractory MUI, even in an elderly and frail study population. Patients benefit from the short surgical procedure without the need for general anaesthesia or discontinuation of anticoagulation.

Urethral bulking agents for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: A systematic review

AIMS

To perform a systematic review to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of all urethral bulking agents (UBAs) available for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. A systematic search was conducted using the Ovid Medline, Embase and PubMed databases. Studies were included if they involved women who underwent either Bulkamid®, Macroplastique®, Durasphere®, Coaptite®, or Urolastic® injections for the treatment of SUI. A total of 583 articles were screened with 56 articles included. A qualitative analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The newer synthetic UBAs are not inferior to Contigen®, with variable mean success rates of 30%-80% in the short-term. Better long-term success rates were found with Bulkamid® (42%-70%), Coaptite® (60%-75%), and Macroplastique® (21%-80%) on qualitative review. Urinary tract infection rates were similar between bulking agents (4%-10.6%) although temporary acute urinary retention was more commonly associated with Coaptite® (mean: 34.2%), and de novo urgency in Durasphere® (mean: 24.7%). Significant complications such as migration into lymph nodes was reported with Durasphere®. Erosion was reported with Macroplastique®, Coaptite®, and Urolastic®, with a rate as high as 24.6% in one study of Urolastic®.

CONCLUSION

Available data support the use of Bulkamid® and Macroplastique®, which has shown a short-term efficacy of 30%-90% and 40%-85% respectively, and long-term efficacy of 42%-70%, and 21%-80%, respectively. Bulkamid® appears to have a more favorable safety profile, with no cases of erosion or migration of product associated with its use. Direct comparisons of UBAs have not been performed.

An analysis of 1386 periurethral bulking procedures with comparison to 18,763 retropubic tapes

OBJECTIVE

To use British Society of Urogynaecology surgical database to evaluate periurethral bulking agents and retropubic tapes.

STUDY DESIGN

Permission was granted to analyse 1386 periurethral bulking agents and 18,763 retropubic tapes. The primary outcome measure was patient reported global impression of improvement for incontinence with secondary outcomes of change in symptoms of stress incontinence, overactive bladder and complications.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing periurethral bulking agents were older than retropubic tapes (mean 59.4 vs. 52.3 years). Urodynamic stress incontinence was the commonest urodynamic diagnosis (periurethral bulking agents 67%, retropubic tapes 77%) but there was a higher proportion of complex diagnoses in the periurethral bulking agents group. 59.2% patients reported 'very much/much better' on patient reported global impression of improvement for incontinence for periurethral bulking agents compared to 91% for retropubic tapes; 28% patients felt their symptoms of stress incontinence were cured following periurethral bulking agents compared to 77.6% for retropubic tapes and 0.8% developed de novo overactive bladder following periurethral bulking agents compared to 4% with retropubic tapes. There was no difference in outcomes when using periurethral bulking agents as a primary or secondary procedure. There were no intraoperative complications with periurethral bulking agents and fewer post-operative complications compared to retropubic tapes (3.6%).

CONCLUSION

Patient reported success of periurethral bulking agents is lower than retropubic tapes but this is offset by minimal complications despite being an older, more complex patient group. Periurethral bulking agents do appear equally efficacious as a secondary procedure. Information derived from databases can be used during counselling to allow clinicians to demonstrate their own success and complication rates to ensure patients make an informed choice. Patient choice is paramount so all options should be included in full counselling.

A Danish national population-based cohort study of synthetic midurethral slings, 2007-2011

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Synthetic midurethral slings (MUSs) have shown similar cure rates in several short- and medium-term follow-up studies. Recently, long-term follow-up studies have indicated that the cure rate is higher following the retropubic midurethral sling (RPMUS) compared with the transobturator midurethral sling (TOMUS) procedure. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of synthetic MUSs and to examine the influence of department and surgeon volume and patient-related factors on the cure rate of synthetic MUSs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study based on a national population over a 5-year period (2007-2011) using data from the Danish Urogynaecological Database (DugaBase).

RESULTS

A total of 4519 women with first-time MUS were registered in the DugaBase. Cure was achieved in 1242/1639 (75.78%) at a 3-month follow-up. RPMUSs were more frequently in use in high-volume departments compared with the other departments and more often implanted by high- than low-volume surgeons. Women treated by a medium- (adjusted OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.01-3.28, "frequency") or high-volume surgeon (1.98; 1.18-3.32, "frequency") had an increased probability of cure compared with women treated by a low-volume surgeon. The difference was only significant for women who received a TOMUS.

CONCLUSIONS

This national population-based cohort study confirmed a high cure rate of synthetic MUSs at short-term follow-up. It is the largest study to indicate a learning curve for TOMUS. Patients were not actively involved in which synthetic MUS was to be performed as the choice of surgical option was made at the departmental level.