Intraurethral bulking agents for the management of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review

A Single Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence in Females: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To determine the efficacy of a single injection of platelet-rich plasma into the anterior vaginal wall at the mid-urethra compared to placebo, as there is emerging evidence that platelet-rich plasma may help treat female stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

This was a single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial at a single institution. Females with bothersome, demonstrable stress-predominant urinary incontinence were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either injection of 5 mL autologous platelet-rich plasma or saline at the anterior vaginal wall at the mid-urethra. The primary outcome was composite treatment success at six months, defined as a negative cough stress test and an answer of "much better" or "very much better" on the Patient's Global Impression of Improvement.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were enrolled in the study and randomized to the platelet-rich plasma group (n = 25) or the saline placebo group (n = 25). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome between the two groups. Adverse events were minor, and the rate of adverse events was similar between both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this randomized placebo-controlled study, we were unable to demonstrate a difference in stress urinary incontinence treatment success between platelet-rich plasma and saline injections. At this time, there is insufficient evidence to offer a one-time platelet-rich plasma injection into the anterior vaginal wall for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.

Quality of life and sexual function after tension-free vaginal tape and polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: 3-year follow-up from a randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To assess quality of life (QoL) and sexual function outcomes at 3 years after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and polyacrylamide hydrogel injection (PAHG) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

METHODS

In this randomized trial comparing TVT (n = 104) and PAHG (n = 108), we assessed changes in QoL and sexuality using the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Short Form (IIQ-7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and RAND-36 Item Health Survey (RAND-36) at baseline and at 3 years. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized, noninferiority trial comparing patient satisfaction after TVT and PAHG.

RESULTS

In both groups, incontinence-related QoL improved from the baseline (p < 0.00), except for difficulty emptying the bladder and pain/discomfort. Total scores of UDI-6 and IIIQ-7 were lower for TVT compared to PAHG (p < 0.00) indicating better QoL at 3 years. Urinary incontinence with sexual activity or fear of incontinence restricting sexual activity improved in both groups (p < 0.00), with higher scores for physical section subscale in PISQ-12 (p = 0.02) for TVT. Physical and social functioning (RAND-36) improved from the baseline in both groups (p < 0.01) with a better outcome in the TVT group for physical functioning (p = 0.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Both TVT and PAHG improve QoL and sexual function in primary SUI with better incontinence and health-related QoL scores in the TVT group compared to the PAHG group at 3 years.

Retreatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence After Midurethral Sling With Prior Urethral Bulking

IMPORTANCE

There is limited current literature regarding the retreatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after midurethral sling (MUS) placement with prior urethral bulking.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to evaluate the retreatment and perioperative complications of MUS placement with prior urethral bulking compared with MUS placement without prior urethral bulking.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients within the Southern California Permanente Medical Group who underwent MUS placement from January 2009 to December 2020. Patients who underwent prior urethral bulking were compared with a control group without prior urethral bulking in a 1:1 ratio matched by age and MUS procedure date. The primary outcome was the retreatment of SUI after MUS placement with prior urethral bulking. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications. Regression models were used to evaluate associations between retreatment and perioperative complications while controlling for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients who underwent MUS placement with prior urethral bulking were identified and matched with 85 control patients who underwent MUS placement without prior urethral bulking. Patients who underwent MUS placement without prior urethral bulking were more likely to have concomitant surgery. Linear regression analysis controlling for the effect of concomitant surgery revealed no difference in estimated blood loss and operative time between the 2 groups. In logistic regression analysis, there was no difference in the retreatment rate and perioperative complications between groups.

CONCLUSION

We found that the unique treatment combination of MUS placement with prior urethral bulking for recurrent SUI seems to have a similar retreatment rate and perioperative complications as MUS placement without prior urethral bulking.

Cost-effectiveness of urethral bulking polydimethylsiloxane-Urolastic® compared with mid-urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence: A two-arm cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of urethral bulking polydimethylsiloxane-Urolastic® (PDMS-U) compared with mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) at 1-year follow-up.

DESIGN

Prospective, two-arm cohort study with 2-year follow-up.

SETTING

International multicentre.

POPULATION

Women with moderate to severe SUI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was subjective cure (Patient Global Impression of Improvement).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

objective cure (negative cough stress test), Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), complications and re-interventions. Cost-effectiveness outcomes: total costs, quality-adjusted life year (QALY) using IIQ7-scores (Incontinence Impact Questionnaire) and EQ-5D-5L, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and monetary benefit (adjusted for baseline confounders).

RESULTS

In all, 131 PDMS-U and 153 MUS surgery patients were treated. Subjective cure rates for MUS surgery and PDMS-U were, respectively: 101/112 (90%) versus 40/87 (46%), adjusted odds ratio (aOR; for age, body mass index [BMI], severity, type of urinary incontinence and previous SUI procedure) was 4.9. Objective cure rates for MUS surgery and PDMS-U were respectively: 98/109 (90%) versus 58/92 (63%), aOR 5.4. Average total costs for PDMS-U and MUS surgery were €3567 and €6688. ICER for MUS surgery cost €15 598 per IIQ QALY and €37 408 per EQ-5D-5L QALY. With a willingness to pay (WTP) of €25 000, MUS has a 84% chance of being cost-effective using IIQ, whereas PDMS-U has a 99% chance of being cost-effective using EQ-5D-5L.

CONCLUSION

MUS surgery is more cost-effective in realising improved disease-specific quality of life (QoL), while PDMS-U is more cost-effective in realising improved generic QoL.

Stem Cell Application for Stress Urinary Incontinence: From Bench to Bedside

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common urinary system disease worldwide. Nowadays, medical therapy and surgery can control the symptoms and improve the life quality of patients. However, they might also bring about complications as the standard therapy fails to address the underlying problem of urethral sphincter dysfunction. Recent advances in cell technology have aroused interest in the use of autologous stem cell therapy to restore the ability of urinary control. The present study reviewed several types of stem cells for the treatment of SUI in the experimental and clinical stages.

Therapies Based on Adipose-Derived Stem Cells for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Narrative Review

Lower urinary tract dysfunction often requires tissue repair or replacement to restore physiological functions. Current clinical treatments involving autologous tissues or synthetic materials inevitably bring in situ complications and immune rejection. Advances in therapies using stem cells offer new insights into treating lower urinary tract dysfunction. One of the most frequently used stem cell sources is adipose tissue because of its easy access, abundant source, low risk of severe complications, and lack of ethical issues. The regenerative capabilities of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in vivo are primarily orchestrated by their paracrine activities, strong regenerative potential, multi-differentiation potential, and cell–matrix interactions. Moreover, biomaterial scaffolds conjugated with ASCs result in an extremely effective tissue engineering modality for replacing or repairing diseased or damaged tissues. Thus, ASC-based therapy holds promise as having a tremendous impact on reconstructive urology of the lower urinary tract.

Urethral injection of dedifferentiated fat cells ameliorates sphincter damage and voiding dysfunction in a rat model of persistence stress urinary incontinence

Purpose

Dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells are mature adipocyte-derived multipotent cells that can be applicable to cell-based therapy for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). This study developed a persistence SUI model that allows long-term evaluation using a combination of vaginal distention (VD) and bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) in rats. Then, the therapeutic effects of DFAT cell transplantation in the persistence SUI model was examined.

Methods

In total, 48 Sprague–Dawley rats were divided into four groups and underwent VD (VD group), bilateral OVX (OVX group), VD and bilateral OVX (VD + OVX group), or sham operation (Control group). At 2, 4, and 6 weeks after injury, leak point pressure (LPP) and histological changes of the urethral sphincter were evaluated. Next, 14 rats undergoing VD and bilateral OVX were divided into two groups and administered urethral injection of DFAT cells (DFAT group) or fibroblasts (Fibroblast group). At 6 weeks after the injection, LPP and histology of the urethral sphincter were evaluated.

Results

The VD + OVX group retained a decrease in LPP with sphincter muscle atrophy at least until 6 weeks after injury. The LPP and urethral sphincter muscle atrophy in the DFAT group recovered better than those in the fibroblast group.

Conclusions

The persistence SUI model was created by a combination of VD and bilateral OVX in rats. Urethral injection of DFAT cells inhibited sphincter muscle atrophy and improved LPP in the persistence SUI model. These findings suggest that the DFAT cells may be an attractive cell source for cell-based therapy to treat SUI.

Stress Urinary Incontinence: Slings, Single-Incision Slings, and Nonmesh Approaches

Synthetic midurethral slings offer optimal cure rates for the minimally invasive treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Performed via a retropubic or transobturator technique, midurethral sling approaches demonstrate comparable efficacy, with unique adverse event profiles. Single incision slings were introduced to minimize the complication of groin pain with full-length transobturator slings and enhance operative recovery. The earliest therapies for stress urinary incontinence including urethral bulking, retropubic colposuspension, and autologous sling offer alternative methods of surgical management without using synthetic mesh. These methods boast satisfactory efficacy with low rates of complications, and may be ideal for appropriately selected patients.

Clinical presentation and treatment of Macroplastique® urethral exposures: a retrospective case series

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Manufacturers of Macroplastique® for urethral bulking have not previously reported exposures as potential complications. This study was aimed at identifying presenting symptoms, management, and outcomes in patients experiencing urethral or bladder exposures.

METHODS

A retrospective case series from 2010 to 2019 was performed in an academic affiliated hospital system. Participants were 18-89 years old and received Macroplastique® urethral bulking for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Charts were identified through diagnosis and procedure codes relating to injections of urethral bulking agents and foreign bodies in the bladder or urethra. Factors evaluated were patient history and presenting symptoms, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and outcomes using frequency tables for categorical values and statistical distribution with median and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables.

RESULTS

After review of 1,269 charts, 580 cases met the inclusion criteria and 14 Macroplastique® urethral exposures were identified. The median age at first presentation was 73.5 years (IQR57.5-79.7 years) with 48 months (IQR 22-78 months) as the median time to first presentation after last Macroplastique® injection. The median number of injection sessions was 2 (IQR 1-2.75 sessions) with a medium volume of 4.5 ml (IQR 2.75-9.0 ml). Presenting symptoms included urge incontinence (64.3%), stress urinary incontinence (57.1%), recurrent urinary tract infection (42.9%), urinary urgency (28.9%), urinary frequency (28.9%), urinary retention (14.3%), and interrupted flow (7.1%). Macroplastique® urethral exposures were extracted in 10 patients using blunt, sharp, or electrocautery excision. No complications after excision were identified and improvement in urinary symptoms was observed.

CONCLUSION

Urethral bulking with Macroplastique® can lead to symptomatic urethral exposures.

Periurethral injection with polyacrylamide after previous TVT surgery

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this registry study was to assess the clinical utility of using periurethral bulking with polyacrylamide hydrogel in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after previous midurethral sling surgery.

METHODS

The study period was 2007 through 2019. Using data from the Norwegian Female Incontinence Registry we included 57 women who had received Bulkamid® because of insufficient improvement or recurrent SUI after previous retropubic TVT surgery. The primary outcome was cure of SUI, and secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, degree of leakage, change in urgency incontinence (UUI), free flow rate, postvoid residual volume, and complications. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare pre- and postoperative results for pairs, with level of significance at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Pure SUI was seen in 19 (33.3%) while 38 (66.7%) had mixed incontinence. Postoperatively 72.9% had a negative stress test and 73.7% were satisfied with treatment. There was only 1 complication in 67 injections (1.5%). De novo UUI occurred in five patients, corresponding to 8.8% of the whole study group, but 26.3% among those with no preoperative UUI problems. Among the patients with preoperative UUI, 39.5% were cured of this problem and a further 36.8% were improved.

CONCLUSIONS

The cure rate and satisfaction rate of periurethral bulking with polyacrylamide after previous MUS are favorable and complications are rare. There seems to be a risk of overactive bladder symptoms developing in women with no such symptoms preoperatively.

Safety and efficacy of polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique®) in women with stress urinary incontinence: analysis of data from patients who completed three years follow-up

Introduction and hypothesis

This study aimed to report 3-year completed follow-up of the safety and efficacy of Macroplastique® (MPQ) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD).

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of all women who completed 3-year follow-up post-MPQ injection(s) at ten medical centers. We used the ROSE registry data report of Macroplastique® [Macroplastique® Real-time Observation of Safety and Effectiveness (ROSE) registry P040050/PAS001 on 2017]. Subjective incontinence outcome and adverse effects were assessed.

Results

The study included all patients (n = 70) who completed 3-year follow-up after the last MPQ injection. Twenty-four of 70 (34%) patients had two injections; 21/70 (30%) patients reported Stamey grade 0 and 28/70 (40%) reported Stamey grade 1. The overall patient satisfaction was 68% who completed 3-year follow-up. The composite success rate (I-QoL, PGI-S, and Stamey grade improvement) was 51.4%. No serious adverse events (AE) were reported within the completed 3-year follow-up.

Conclusions

MPQ was found to be safe and efficacious for the treatment of SUI secondary to ISD in women. The overall high satisfaction rate was sustained from baseline to 3 years post-injection. Most complications were minor and transient without sequelae.

A systematic review of stem cell therapy treatment for women suffering from stress urinary incontinence

BACKGROUND

Stem cell therapy (SCT) is used for regeneration of injured tissues. This seems a novel promising strategy for restoring urethral sphincter function in patients with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the clinical trials available to date on SCT for treatment of SUI in women.

SEARCH STRATEGY

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Embase.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective interventional case series, randomized prospective interventional study and prospective cohort study assessing women aged 18 years and over diagnosed with SUI and treated by SCT were included. The quality of studies was finally assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklists according to the PRISMA guidelines.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nineteen studies (n = 773 patients) were selected for final analysis. These were conducted worldwide between the years 2005 and 2016. Although different cell types were used, general processing steps were similar. The follow-up period ranged between 6 weeks and 6 years and included common subjective and objective evaluation tools.

RESULTS

Overall, the studies imply that SCT for treatment of SUI is a safe and effective treatment.

CONCLUSION

In our opinion, the initial results of SCT for the treatment of SUI seem promising. Standardization and validation of this treatment modality is required before it can be recommended for routine use.

An analysis of 1386 periurethral bulking procedures with comparison to 18,763 retropubic tapes

OBJECTIVE

To use British Society of Urogynaecology surgical database to evaluate periurethral bulking agents and retropubic tapes.

STUDY DESIGN

Permission was granted to analyse 1386 periurethral bulking agents and 18,763 retropubic tapes. The primary outcome measure was patient reported global impression of improvement for incontinence with secondary outcomes of change in symptoms of stress incontinence, overactive bladder and complications.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing periurethral bulking agents were older than retropubic tapes (mean 59.4 vs. 52.3 years). Urodynamic stress incontinence was the commonest urodynamic diagnosis (periurethral bulking agents 67%, retropubic tapes 77%) but there was a higher proportion of complex diagnoses in the periurethral bulking agents group. 59.2% patients reported 'very much/much better' on patient reported global impression of improvement for incontinence for periurethral bulking agents compared to 91% for retropubic tapes; 28% patients felt their symptoms of stress incontinence were cured following periurethral bulking agents compared to 77.6% for retropubic tapes and 0.8% developed de novo overactive bladder following periurethral bulking agents compared to 4% with retropubic tapes. There was no difference in outcomes when using periurethral bulking agents as a primary or secondary procedure. There were no intraoperative complications with periurethral bulking agents and fewer post-operative complications compared to retropubic tapes (3.6%).

CONCLUSION

Patient reported success of periurethral bulking agents is lower than retropubic tapes but this is offset by minimal complications despite being an older, more complex patient group. Periurethral bulking agents do appear equally efficacious as a secondary procedure. Information derived from databases can be used during counselling to allow clinicians to demonstrate their own success and complication rates to ensure patients make an informed choice. Patient choice is paramount so all options should be included in full counselling.

Easy way to treat female stress urinary incontinence with bulking agents (with video)

Since the recent controversy about vaginal mesh implants, surgeons should use safe and effective devices and procedures to treat female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We propose to describe the noninvasive and ambulatory technique of the urethral bulking procedure. Bulking agents are a simple, minimally invasive technique that can be offered in the treatment of female SUI.

Seven-year efficacy and safety outcomes of Bulkamid for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

AIMS

Bulking agents are a minimally invasive treatment option for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) or stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety following treatment with Bulkamid as a primary procedure for SUI or stress-predominant MUI.

METHODS

This was an Institutional Review Board-approved single-center retrospective study of female patients with SUI or stress-predominant MUI who had undergone injection with Bulkamid since 2005 and had completed 7 years of follow up. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction measured on a four-point scale as cured, improved, unchanged, or worse. Secondary outcomes included the number of incontinence pads used, International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) scores, Visual Analog Scale Quality of Life (VAS QoL), reinjection rates, and perioperative and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

A total of 1,200 patients were treated with Bulkamid since 2005 and of these, 388 (32.3%) had completed 7 years of follow-up. A total of 67.1% of the patients reported feeling cured or improved if Bulkamid was a primary procedure, 11.1% reported no change, and 2.3% reported worsening of incontinence. A total of 19.5% of patients received a subsequent other incontinence procedure. The ICIQ-UI SF was reduced by 8.6 points. VAS QoL improved by a mean of 4.3 points. Postoperative complications were transient. Prolonged bladder emptying time was reported in 15.3% of patients and urinary tract infection in 3.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bulkamid injections are an effective and safe first-line treatment option for women with SUI or stress-predominant MUI providing durable outcomes at 7 years.

Quality of life and sexual function after TVT surgery versus Bulkamid injection for primary stress urinary incontinence: 1 year results from a randomized clinical trial

Introduction and hypothesis

To assess changes in quality of life (QoL) and sexual function outcomes at 1 year after tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) versus polyacrylamide hydrogel injection (PAHG).

Methods

In a randomized trial comparing TVT (n = 111) and PAHG (n = 113) treatments of stress urinary incontinence (SUI), we compared urinary incontinence and health-related QoL using the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6), Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Short Form (IIQ-7), Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) and RAND-36 Item Health Survey (RAND-36) at baseline and 1 year.

Results

UDI-6 and IIQ-7 showed improved incontinence-related QoL (p = 0.001) from baseline in both groups except for difficulty emptying the bladder and pain/discomfort. At 1 year, TVT patients experienced less urinary symptom-related distress compared to PAHG (p < 0.001). Sexual function improved in both groups (p < 0.001 for TVT and p = 0.01 for PAHG) with higher scores for the physical section subscale (p < 0.001) for TVT. Health-related QoL (RAND-36) improved from baseline in both groups in physical and social functioning (p < 0.001) with better outcome in the TVT group for physical functioning (p < 0.001). Increase in pain from baseline (p = 0.02) was detected for TVT, but not for PAHG. However, there was no difference between the groups (p = 0.78).

Conclusions

In primary SUI, TVT and PAHG treatments both improved QoL and sexual function at 1 year. However, incontinence and health-related QoL scores were better in the TVT group. More pain compared to the baseline was reported after TVT, although there was no difference between groups. Clinical significance needs to be evaluated in long-term follow-up.

Local tissue reaction and histopathological characteristics of three different bulking agents: a rabbit model

Purpose:

We assessed the efficacy and safety of a single injection of three bulking agents over the short- and long-term follow-ups in rabbits. Dermal and preputial matrices were compared with Deflux (DxHA) injection.

Material and methods:

Twenty-four rabbits were divided into three groups. Group I (n=8) underwent the injection of a lyophilized dermal matrix (LDM) beneath the seromuscular layer of the bladder wall. Rabbits in group II (n=8) were injected with lyophilized preputial matrix (LPM). Rabbits of group III (n=8) were injected with DxHA as the control group. They were followed up for 1 and 6 months after the injection. Subcutaneous injection of all bulking agents was also performed in nude mice. Biopsies were stained with LCA (leukocyte common antibody), CD68, CD31, and CD34. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and MTT assay were also performed.

Results:

Immunohistochemistry staining with CD68 and LCA revealed higher inflammation grade in LDM as compared with LPM and DxHA. Fibrosis grade was also higher in LDM both in short- and long-term follow-ups. However, no significant difference was detected in CD31 and CD34 staining between control and experimental groups. SEM analysis showed that the particle size of LPM was more similar to DxHA. MTT assay revealed that cell proliferation was similar in DxHA, LDM, and LPM. In-vivo assay in nude mice model showed more promising results in LPM as compared with LDM.

Conclusion:

The long-term results demonstrated that LPM was more similar to Deflux with the least local tissue reaction, inflammation, and fibrosis grade.

Bladder neck and urethral erosions after Macroplastique injections

AIMS

To evaluate the presentation, risk factors, diagnostic workup, management, and outcomes of Macroplastique (MPQ) erosions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of women experiencing MPQ erosion at two tertiary care centers (United States and United Kingdom). Data collected included age, presenting symptoms, parity, comorbidities, hormone replacement therapy, sexual activity, and smoking status. Previous surgical history, time from MPQ injection, urine culture results, and cystoscopic and imaging findings were also reviewed. Development of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after MPQ removal and subsequent SUI treatments were recorded.

RESULTS

From 2012 to 2018, 18 patients were identified with a median follow-up time of 24 months (interquartile range [IQR] 8-33). All patients presented with recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI) and had cystoscopic evidence of MPQ erosion. The most common location of erosion was the bladder neck area (72%). Median time to presentation since MPQ injection was 14 months (IQR 11-35). The majority of patients (72%) had a previous history of anti-incontinence surgery. The overall success rate of endoscopic management defined as resolution of presenting symptoms including rUTI was 80%. The majority of patients (80%) developed recurrent SUI following MPQ resection with 33% requiring a subsequent autologous fascial sling placement.

CONCLUSION

MPQ erosions present predominantly with UTI, sometimes years after the original injection, and may necessitate endoscopic management with satisfactory results in most patients. Following excision of MPQ, these patients are highly likely to experience SUI recurrence and need to be appropriately counseled. Some may require additional subsequent autologous fascial sling placement for treatment of their SUI symptoms.

Patients' satisfaction and safety of bulk injection therapy Urolastic for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A cross-sectional study

Aims

Primary outcome was to evaluate patients' satisfaction after being treated with bulk injection therapy polydimethylsiloxane Urolastic (PDMS‐U) for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondary outcomes were: subjective cure, objective cure, severity of SUI symptoms, complications, reintervention rate, and disease‐specific quality of life. Furthermore, to determine if outcomes worsened during time‐after‐treatment (time‐frames: 0‐12, 13‐24, and ≥25 months).

Methods

In a cross‐sectional design, patients treated with PDMS‐U were recruited for hospital revisit. The primary outcome, patients' satisfaction, was assessed by the surgical satisfaction questionnaire. Subjective cure, objective cure, and severity of symptoms were assessed by the patients global impression of improvement, standardized cough stress test, and Sandvik severity scale, respectively. Medical charts and face‐to‐face interviews were used to determine complications and reinterventions.

Results

About 110 patients participated, 87 revisited the hospital. Median follow‐up was 25 months (interquartile range: 14;35 months). Patients' satisfaction rate was 51%. Subjective and objective cure were respectively 46% and 47%. Most prevalent complications were: urinary retention (22%), pain (15%), and dyspareunia (15%). Exposure and erosion occurred in 7% and 5%, respectively. Reintervention rate of reinjection and excision of bulk material was 6% and 18.0%, respectively. Objective cure significantly worsened during time‐after‐treatment (P = < .05).

Conclusions

About half of the patients being treated with PDMS‐U were satisfied and subjectively cured 2 years after treatment, although the majority still experienced symptoms of SUI. Most complications were mild and transient, however, in 18% excision of bulk material was indicated for severe or persistent complications such as pain, exposure, or erosion.

Regenerative medicine and injection therapies in stress urinary incontinence

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common and bothersome condition. Anti-incontinence surgery has high cure rates, but concerns about mesh tapes have resulted in the resurgence of surgical procedures that involve increased abdominopelvic dissection and morbidity. Injection therapy with urethral bulking agents or stem cell formulations have been developed as minimally invasive alternatives. Many synthetic and biological bulking agents have been trialled, but several have been discontinued owing to safety concerns. The use of Macroplastique and Contigen has the largest evidence base, but, overall, success rates seem to be similar between the various agents and positive outcomes are poorly sustained for more than 6 months. Furthermore, subjective cure rates, although initially high, also deteriorate over time. The available data consistently demonstrate manifestly poorer outcomes for injection therapies than for surgery. Stem cell treatments are thought to functionally regenerate the urethral sphincter in patients with suspected intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Autologous adipose and muscle-derived stem cells seem to be the intuitive cell source, as they are comparatively abundant, can be harvested and cause minimal donor site morbidity. To date, only a few small clinical studies have been reported and most data are derived from animal models. The success rates of stem cell injection therapies seem to be comparable with those of bulking agents.

Complications of urethral bulking therapy for female stress urinary incontinence

AIMS

To review, report, and discuss the complications associated with urethral bulking therapy in female stress urinary incontinence.

METHODS

An extensive nonsystematic literature review on complications associated with injectable bulking agents used in the clinical practice was conducted. We reviewed articles published in English and indexed in the PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases. Original articles, case reports, and case series were taken into consideration. Data regarding the safety of injectable bulking agents and the complications associated with their utility within the context of urethral bulking therapy for female stress urinary incontinence were extracted and discussed.

RESULTS

Approximately, 1/3 of the patients experience some type of a complication after urethral bulking therapy. The majority of these complications are of low grade, transient, do not necessitate additional surgical intervention, and amenable to treatment with conservative measures such as clean intermittent catheterization and antibiotics. However, more serious complications such as abscess formation, delayed hypersensitivity reactions, and vaginal erosion have been reported. Some of the injectable bulking agents have been withdrawn from the market because of their unfavorable adverse effect profile.

CONCLUSIONS

Urethral bulking therapy can be considered as a low-risk procedure. However, it is not without complications which can be severe in rare instances. The search for the ideal urethral bulking agent is ongoing and future comparative studies assessing the safety and efficacy of these compounds in randomized controlled settings are warranted.

How cure rates drive patients' preference for urethral bulking agent or mid-urethral sling surgery as therapy for stress urinary incontinence

AIMS

To assess the patients' median-accepted threshold of cure rate for urethral bulking agent (UBA) treatment compared to mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Secondly, to determine the correlation between treatment trade-off point and patient characteristics.

METHODS

Women older than 18 years, with predominant SUI, seeking treatment, underwent a structured interview. The treatment trade-off point was determined in scenario one: UBA vs transobturator standard MUS surgery (SMUS) performed under general/spinal anesthesia with one-night hospital stay, and scenario 2: UBA compared to single-incision MUS surgery (SIMS) performed under local analgesia (with sedation) in a daycare setting. The treatment trade-off point was assessed by decreasing the cure rate of UBA from 85% to 10% with steps of 2% until the patient's treatment preference switched to SMUS/SIMS.

RESULTS

One hundred and five patients were interviewed. Mean age was 52 years (SD, ±13.4). The median trade-off point for scenarios 1 and 2 was 79% (interquartile range [IQR]: 69, 85) and 85% (IQR: 71, 85), respectively. Patients with longer duration of SUI symptoms were willing to trade more efficacy to prefer UBA treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SUI are willing to trade a lower cure rate to prefer UBA over SMUS to avoid hospitalization and general anesthesia. When SIMS is performed in a daycare setting under local analgesia, the majority of patients with SUI are of the opinion that cure rates of UBA should be at least as high as SIMS to be worth considering. The treatment preference is not strongly correlated with the patients' characteristics.

Female stress urinary incontinence MDT

The management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has come under scrutiny in recent years following growing reports of mesh-related complications. Patients require thorough evaluation and management as part of a multidisciplinary team, and extensive counselling about the surgical treatment options is imperative. There is no clear consensus on the optimal management of the complex group of patients with mesh-related complications or recurrent SUI. We present two cases of female SUI to highlight the key factors to be considered when managing these patients.

Level of evidence: Level 5.

Patients' perspectives on urethral bulk injection therapy and mid-urethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to identify all treatment decision factors that determined the preference for peri-urethral bulk injection therapy (PBI) or mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery in patients with primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Second, we explored what patients expect from treatment for SUI and whether patients would consider PBI as a primary treatment option.

METHODS

In a qualitative design, 20 semi-structured, face-to-face interviews were conducted in women with primary SUI. Exclusion criteria were: previous PBI or MUS surgery; predominating urgency. Interviews were guided by three open-ended questions and a topic list. PBI treatment and MUS surgery were described in detail, and the efficacy was stated as 70% and 90%, respectively. Data saturation was reached when no new treatment decision factors were identified in three consecutive interviews. Interviews were audiotaped and fully transcribed. Thematic analysis by a coding process was done independently by two researchers.

RESULTS

Sixteen procedural, personal, professional, social and external treatment decision factors were identified. Regarding expectations about treatment for SUI, women believed 'becoming dry' was wishful thinking. The majority of patients accepted a small degree of persistent urinary incontinence after treatment. Regardless of their treatment preference, patients indicated that women should be informed about PBI as a primary treatment option.

CONCLUSION

Patients with primary SUI are open to PBI as an alternative treatment option even with lower cure rates compared with MUS surgery performed under general or spinal anesthesia. Patients indicated that women with primary SUI seeking treatment should be informed about PBI as a treatment option.

Periurethral Mass Mimicking Neoplasm After Injection of Macroplastique for Postprostatectomy Stress Incontinence: A Pitfall on 18F-FDG PET/CT

A 64-year-old man underwent initial F-FDG PET/CT staging for gastric cardia adenocarcinoma, which showed the primary gastric tumor, several bone metastases, and high uptake in a periurethral mass mimicking pelvic neoplasm developed after injection of polydimethylsiloxane (Macroplastique) urethral bulking agent 6 years ago for postprostatectomy stress urinary incontinence. This case showed a very rare complication of silicon particle injection therapy, and the intense uptake is likely due to granulomatous reaction around the implant.

Comparison of adjustable continence therapy periurethral balloons and artificial urinary sphincter in female patients with stress urinary incontinence due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to compare the outcomes of the ACT® device with those of the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) AMS 800 in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) due to sphincter deficiency in women.

METHODS

All the women who underwent surgical treatment for SUI due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency from 2007 to 2017 were included in a single-center retrospective study. The primary endpoint was the functional outcome. Perioperative functional parameters of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent an ACT® implantation and 36 an AUS implantation. Patients in the AUS group were younger (62.9 vs 70.4 years; p = 0.03) with less comorbidity (ASA Score = 3 in 12.1% vs 33.3%; p = 0.005). Operative time and hospital stay were shorter in the ACT® group (45.7 vs 206.1 min; p < 0.001; 1.7 vs 7 days; p < 0.001 respectively). There was a higher rate of intraoperative complications in the AUS group (47% vs 8%; p < 0.001) but the rates of postoperative complications were similar between both groups. The ACT® was associated with an increased risk of urinary retention (20% vs 2.8%; p = 0.04). Results were in favor of AUS for: decrease in USP stress incontinence subscore (-7.6 vs -3.2; p < 0.001), number of pads per 24 h (- 4.6 vs -2.3; p = 0.002), PGII scale (PGII = 1: 61.1% vs 12%; p < 0.001), and cure rate (71.4% vs 21.7%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present series, keeping in mind the significantly different baseline characteristics, AUS implantation was associated with better functional outcomes than the ACT® in female patients with SUI due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency, but with a higher intraoperative complications rate, longer operative time, and a longer stay.

Cell Therapy Clinical Trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Current Status and Perspectives

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects 200 million people worldwide. Standard therapies often provide symptomatic relief, but without targeting the underlying etiology, and show tremendous patient-to-patient variability, limited success and complications associated with the procedures. We review in this article the latest clinical trials performed to treat SUI using cell-based therapies. These therapies, despite typically including only a small number of patients and short term evaluation of results, have proven to be feasible and safe. However, there is not yet a consensus for the best cell source to be used to treat SUI and not all patients may be suitable for these therapies. Therefore, more clinical trials should be promoted recruiting large number of patients and evaluating long term results.

Laser procedure for female urinary stress incontinence: A review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

There is increasing interest in noninvasive treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI), including a vaginal laser procedure. In view of a lack of data on this technique, we conducted a non-systematic review of the literature.

METHODS

We reviewed studies concerning the laser treatment of SUI from PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Study design, outcome measure, number of participants, procedural complications and results were analyzed.

RESULTS

The use of laser treatment of female SUI has been described in 7 prospective, single-center and non-comparative (no control group) studies, all of which used an erbium YAG or a CO2 laser in thermal non-ablative treatment. Primary outcome was ICIQ-UI-SF score in six studies, and pad tests in one study. Follow-up ranged from 5 to 36months. Improvement rates ranged from 62% to 78%. No major adverse events were noted. Minor side effects included sensation of warmth, increased vaginal discharge and transient urge urinary incontinence.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of vaginal laser treatment of SUI has not been assessed in comparative studies. More rigorous and adequately powered trials are required to assess the relative benefits and adverse event profile of laser treatment of SUI, as compared with other minimally invasive procedures.