A cost-effectiveness analysis of Onabotulinumtoxin A as first-line treatment for overactive bladder

Quality of Life in Female Patients with Overactive Bladder after Botulinum Toxin Treatment

BACKGROUND

Manifestations of OAB can considerably diminish the quality of life. Botulinum toxin has emerged as a valuable treatment option in diseases whose symptoms cannot be controlled adequately with other available therapies. The aim of the present study was to compare the subjective quality of life of patients with OAB before the injection of botulinum toxin and three and six months after the intervention.

METHODS

This study was based on a diagnostic survey with three validated questionnaires, ICIQ-OAB, ICIQ-OABqol, and ICIQ-LUTSqol, and an additional questionnaire developed by the authors to collect sociodemographic characteristics and selected medical data.

RESULTS

This study demonstrated significant differences between pre-treatment scores and those at three and six months post injection. At three and six months after the intervention, mean scores for all three instruments (ICIQ-OAB, ICIQ-OABqol, ICIQ-LUTSqol) were significantly lower than the respective pre-treatment values, implying a significant attenuation of OAB symptoms and their lower impact on the quality of life. However, the severity of OAB symptoms and their impact on the quality of life at six months post intervention were significantly higher than at three months, except for the social interaction domain.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin is an effective treatment for OAB.

Cost analysis for mirabegron use in the treatment of children with neurogenic bladder

INTRODUCTION

Mirabegron is a beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonist that received FDA approval in 2021 to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) in children ages three years and older. Despite its safety and efficacy, access to mirabegron frequently remains restricted by payor coverage policies.

OBJECTIVE

This cost minimization study sought to determine the cost implications from a payor perspective of mirabegron use at different points in the treatment pathway for pediatric NDO.

STUDY DESIGN

A Markov decision analytic model was constructed to assess the costs for eight treatment strategies over a 10-year period, using six-month cycles (Table). Five strategies involve mirabegron use as first-, second-, third-, or fourth-line therapy. Two strategies, including the "base case," entail use of anticholinergic medications followed by onabotulinum toxin type A (Botox) injection and augmentation cystoplasty. A strategy involving first-line Botox was also modeled. The effectiveness, adverse event rates, attrition rates, and costs associated with each treatment option were obtained from the clinical literature and adjusted to a six-month cycle. Costs were adjusted to 2021-dollar value. A discount rate of 3% was used. To quantify uncertainty, costs and treatment transition probabilities were modeled as gamma and PERT distributions, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) was conducted using a Monte Carlo simulation with 100,000 iterations. Analyses were performed using Treeage Pro (Healthcare Version).

RESULTS

The least costly strategy involved first-line mirabegron (expected cost $37,954). All strategies involving mirabegron were less costly than the base case ($56,417). On PSA, first-line mirabegron was the least costly strategy in 88.9% of cases (mean $37,604, 95% CI: $37,579-37,628); in 100% of cases, the least costly strategy involved mirabegron use. Cost savings associated with mirabegron use were attributable to decreased use of augmentation cystoplasty and Botox injections.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to compare costs across multiple strategies involving mirabegron to treat pediatric NDO. Mirabegron use likely yields cost savings for the payor: the least costly strategy involved first-line mirabegron, and all pathways incorporating mirabegron were less costly than those without mirabegron use. These findings provide an updated cost analysis for the treatment of NDO by investigating mirabegron use alongside more established treatment options.

CONCLUSION

Use of mirabegron for the treatment of pediatric NDO is likely associated with cost savings as compared to treatment pathways without mirabegron. Expansion of payor coverage for mirabegron, as well as clinical studies to study first-line mirabegron use, should be considered.

Treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity and overactive bladder with Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA): Development, insights, and impact

Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is a complication of multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury (SCI), stroke, head injury, and other conditions characterized by damage to the upper motor neuronal system. NDO often leads to high bladder pressure that may cause upper urinary tract damage and urinary incontinence (UI). Prior to the use of onabotulinumtoxinA, oral anticholinergics and surgical augmentation cystoplasty were the treatment options. Overactive bladder (OAB) is non-neurogenic and affects a much larger population than NDO. Both NDO and OAB negatively impact patients' quality of life (QOL) and confer high health care utilization burdens. Early positive results from pioneering investigators who injected onabotulinumtoxinA into the detrusor of patients with SCI caught the interest of Allergan, which then initiated collaborative clinical trials that resulted in FDA approval of onabotulinumtoxinA 200U in 2011 for NDO and 100U in 2013 for patients with OAB who inadequately respond to or are intolerant of an anticholinergic. These randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials for NDO showed significant improvements in UI episodes, urodynamic parameters, and QOL; the most frequent adverse events were urinary tract infection (UTI) and urinary retention. Similarly, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of onabotulinumtoxinA 100U for OAB found significant improvements in UI episodes, treatment benefit, and QOL; UTI and dysuria were the most common adverse events. Long-term studies in NDO and OAB showed sustained effectiveness and safety with repeat injections of onabotulinumtoxinA, the use of which has profoundly improved the QOL of patients failing anticholinergic therapy and has expanded the utilization of onabotulinumtoxinA into smooth muscle.

Healthcare and economic burden of anticholinergic use in adults with overactive bladder: a systematic literature review

Aim: To determine the economic burden associated with anticholinergic medication use in adults with overactive bladder (OAB) in the USA. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify articles assessing healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs associated with anticholinergic use in adults with OAB. Results: From the 34 articles identified, increased anticholinergic burden, switching anticholinergic treatments and potentially inappropriate anticholinergic use were associated with increased HCRU and/or costs. However, studies comparing patients with OAB receiving anticholinergics to individuals with untreated OAB or without OAB reported a mix of increases and decreases in HCRU and costs. Conclusion: Additional controlled studies assessing the economic impact of anticholinergics in OAB are needed and may enable optimization of economic and potentially patient outcomes.

Cost-effectiveness of vibegron for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States

AIMS

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vibegron compared with other oral pharmacologic therapies as treatment for overactive bladder (OAB).

METHODS

A semi-Markov model with monthly cycles was developed to support a lifetime horizon of vibegron 75 mg from a US commercial payor or Medicare perspective. The model incorporated efficacy (reductions in daily micturitions and urinary incontinence episodes), adverse events, OAB-related comorbidities, drug-drug interactions, anticholinergic burden, and treatment persistence. Direct costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were accumulated over time. The primary outcome was the cost per QALY incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed.

RESULTS

For commercial payors, vibegron was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY versus mirabegron 50 mg (ICER, $9,311) and at a WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY versus mirabegron 25 mg (ICER, $141,957) and versus an anticholinergic basket based on market share (ICER, $118,121). For Medicare, vibegron was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY versus mirabegron 50 mg (ICER, $12,154) and at a WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY versus mirabegron 25 mg (ICER, $99,150) and versus an anticholinergic market basket (ICER, $60,756). For commercial payors and Medicare, OWSAs for vibegron versus mirabegron indicated cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to vibegron persistence at 1 and 12 months. PSAs indicated that vibegron was cost-effective versus mirabegron 50 mg 98.6% and 100% of the time at $50,000/QALY for commercial payors and Medicare payors, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Due to lack of real-world data available on persistence, vibegron was assumed to have the same persistence as mirabegron 50 mg. Long-term efficacy was assumed to be sustained beyond 52 weeks in the absence of clinical trials longer than 52 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Vibegron is cost-effective from a commercial payor (WTP threshold $150,000/QALY) and Medicare (WTP threshold $100,000/QALY) perspective when compared with other oral pharmacologic treatments for OAB.

Cost-Utility Analysis of Oxybutynin vs. OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) in the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome

Background: The UK National Health Service (NHS) propose the use of oxybutynin prior to onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) in the management of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). Oxybutynin is costly and associated with poor adherence, which may not occur with Botox. We conducted a cost-utility analysis (CUA) to compare the medications. Methods: we compared the two treatments in quality-adjusted life years (QALYS), through the NHS’s perspective. Costs were obtained from UK-based sources and were discounted. Total costs were determined by adding the treatment cost and management cost for complications on each branch. A 12-month time frame was used to model the data into a decision tree. Results: Our results found that using Botox first-line had greater cost utility than oxybutynin. The health net benefit calculation showed an increase in 0.22 QALYs when Botox was used first-line. Botox also had greater cost-effectiveness, with the exception of pediatric patients with an ICER of £42,272.14, which is above the NICE threshold of £30,000. Conclusion: Botox was found to be more cost-effective than antimuscarinics in the management of OAB in adults, however less cost-effective in younger patients. This predicates the need for further research to ascertain the age at which Botox becomes cost-effective in the management of OAB.

Beyond botulinum neurotoxin A for chemodenervation of the bladder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT/A), or Botox, is a popular option for overactive bladder (OAB) and neurogenic bladder (NGB) with or without incontinence. This review aims to discuss the clinical outcomes of BoNT in adult and pediatric bladder conditions, and introduces the potential benefit of novel, engineered neurotoxins beyond BoNT/A.

RECENT FINDINGS

A large volume of evidence supports the use of Botox for OAB (to reduce urgency, frequency and incontinence episodes), and for NGB (to decrease incontinence and improve bladder capacity and detrusor pressures). Botox is now also Food & Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for pediatric neurogenic detrusor overactivity. However, urinary retention, diminished response over time and treatment failures are prevalent issues with Botox. Modifying natural BoNTs or forming chimeric toxins are alternatives to BoNT/A that may have higher efficacy and lower side-effect profile. One example is BoNT/BMY-WW. This novel engineered toxin binds to a more commonly expressed synaptotagmin receptor, with potentially more potent paralytic effect and less capacity for systemic diffusion.

SUMMARY

Novel engineered neurotoxins may be the next frontier in OAB and NGB therapy.

Botulinum Toxin A: A Review of Potential Uses in Treatment of Female Urogenital and Pelvic Floor Disorders

Background: Botulinum toxin is an injectable neuromodulator that inhibits transmission between peripheral nerve endings and muscle fibers, resulting in muscle paralysis. Botulinum toxin type A is the most common form of botulinum toxin used in clinical practice.

Methods: In this review, we examine the mechanism of action, formulations, common clinical use in the genital-urinary tract, and potential clinical use in pelvic floor disorders of botulinum toxin type A.

Results: Several aspects of botulinum toxin A make it a favorable therapeutic tool, including its accessibility, its longevity, and its impermanence and reversibility of resultant chemodenervation in a relatively short and safe manner. Although botulinum toxin A has well-established efficacy in treating refractory overactive bladder and neurogenic detrusor overactivity, its use in pelvic floor disorders is still in its infancy.

Conclusion: The efficacy of botulinum toxin A for treating pelvic pain, voiding dysfunction, muscle pain and dysfunction, and certain colorectal-related pain issues shows promise but requires additional rigorous evaluation.

Cost Effectiveness of Sacral Neuromodulation and OnabotulinumtoxinA in Managing Refractory Idiopathic Overactive Bladder

Little information from clinical and modelled studies are available on cost effectiveness of OnabotulinumtoxinA and SNM for the treatment of idiopathic overactive bladder. We aimed to summarize the evidence in this regard from different healthcare systems. Seven studies from 5 countries were reviewed. Some modelled studies with a 10-year time frame showed that sacral neuromodulation became dominant long-term; others suggested OnabotulinumtoxinA was more cost effective at <5 years. There was considerable heterogeneity in the base case/sensitivity analysis and statistical modelling among the studies. Clinical studies with longer term follow-up will help determine cost effectiveness more accurately.

OnabotulinumtoxinA is a well tolerated and effective treatment for refractory overactive bladder in real-world practice

Introduction and hypothesis

In randomized clinical trials onabotulinumtoxinA was demonstrated to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for overactive bladder (OAB) with urinary incontinence (UI). However, data reporting onabotulinumtoxinA use in everyday clinical practice are limited. Here, we present the results from a large, first-of-its-kind real-world study in patients with OAB.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, multinational study (GRACE; ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02161159) performed in four European countries. Patients (N = 504) aged ≥ 18 years with OAB inadequately managed with ≥ 1 anticholinergic received onabotulinumtoxinA per their physician’s normal clinical practice.

Results

Physicians primarily used rigid cystoscopes for onabotulinumtoxinA injection; anesthesia/analgesia was utilized during most treatment procedures. Significant reductions in UI episodes/day from baseline to weeks 1 and 12 were observed as well as in micturition, urgency, and nocturia episodes/day. These improvements in urinary symptoms corresponded to higher scores on the treatment benefit scale at week 12. The use of other OAB medications dropped from baseline to weeks 1 and 12 and was sustained to week 52, which paralleled a reduction in the number of incontinence products used during that time frame. Adverse reactions were reported in 2.6% of patients throughout the study.

Conclusions

In this real-world study, significant improvements in urinary symptoms were seen following onabotulinumtoxinA treatment as early as week 1 and sustained to at least week 12. This was accompanied by a reduced reliance upon incontinence products and reduction in concomitant OAB medication use. OnabotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated with no new safety signals.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-020-04423-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

24/7 usage of continence pads and quality of life impairment in women with urinary incontinence

AIMS

To compare quality of life (QoL) in women with urinary incontinence (UI) using continence pads during the day versus all day and night; to identify risk factors for a 24-hour pad use; to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALY).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study in 331 women with lower urinary tract symptoms referred to urogynaecologic examination was conducted. Main outcome measures were the scores of King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), clinical data, and KHQ-derived utility values.

RESULTS

A total of 270 women with UI were recruited: 176 (57.3%) using continence pads only during the day (group I) and 94 (30.6%) for 24 hours (group II). The groups did not differ in terms of age, menopause, parity, type of UI, stage of POP-Q, and percentage of sexually active subjects. Group II had significantly higher body mass index (BMI) and lower education than group I (P < 0.05). QoL was significantly deteriorated in group II in KHQ Global score and in all domains except one (General Health). Risk factors for 24 hours pad use were as follows: BMI ≥ 30 vs BMI 25-30 (OR = 2.02 (1.09-3.73), P = 0.037), higher scores in KHQ Severity measures (OR = 1.03 (1.02-1.04), P < 0.001), KHQ Global score (OR = 1.03 (1.02-1.05), P < 0.001) and primary compared to secondary (OR = 0.4 (0.19-0.84)) or higher education (OR = 0.41 (0.18-0.94), P < 0.05). Annual QALY was significantly lower in group II (0.9288 ± 0.03 vs 0.9432 ± 0.03, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

One-third of women with UI used continence pads for 24 hours. Among these patients QoL and QALY were found lower compared to women using continence pads only during the day. KHQ Severity measures domain was an independent predictor for a 24-hour usage of continence pads.

The Relative Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron and OnabotulinumtoxinA in Patients With Overactive Bladder who Have Previously Been Managed With an Antimuscarinic: A Network Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of mirabegron and onabotulinumtoxinA in the management of treatment-experienced patients with overactive bladder.

METHODS

The network meta-analysis was based on evidence from a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials and a post-hoc analysis of treatment-experienced subpopulations from mirabegron studies.

RESULTS

Nineteen trials described in 21 publications were included.

CONCLUSION

Overall, compared to mirabegron, there was some evidence that onabotulinumtoxinA was associated with improved outcomes, including reductions in the number of micturitions in a 24-hour period, and the number of incontinence episodes. However, mirabegron was associated with a lower risk of urinary tract infections compared with onabotulinumtoxinA.

New technologies in the management of overactive bladder: current research and future prospects

Overactive bladder is characterized by frequency, urgency (wet or dry) and nocturia. These troublesome symptoms incur both a physiologic and economic cost, expected to be in excess of US$82 billion in the USA and Europe by the year 2020. Second-tier medicinal oral therapies for overactive bladder abound, but the failure rate or discontinuation at 1 year exceeds 50%. Tertiary-tier therapies involve surgical alternatives including neuromodulation of sacral nerve 3 (S3) or the posterior tibial nerve as a means to manipulate and ameliorate the above-described voiding symptoms. Sacral neuromodulation has been studied for more than 20 years, but newer, smaller, rechargeable implantable devices are in the forefront of current investigation. Hopes are that modifications to the device will eventually be possible at the patient's home, rather than the physician's office, with close urological/gynecologic supervision and guidance. Another means of surgical intervention for overactive bladder includes the use of a cystoscopy-guided radiofrequency probe by which energy disrupts the bladder floor neural voiding plexi. Stem cell therapy is also being evaluated for overactive bladder but is in the early stages of development.