Total vaginal length: Does it matter for assessing uterine prolapse?

International Urogynecology consultation chapter 2 committee 3: the clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse including investigations into associated morbidity/pelvic floor dysfunction

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

This manuscript from Chapter 2 of the International Urogynecology Consultation (IUC) on Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) reviews the literature involving the clinical evaluation of a patient with POP and associated bladder and bowel dysfunction.

METHODS

An international group of 11 clinicians performed a search of the literature using pre-specified search MESH terms in PubMed and Embase databases (January 2000 to August 2020). Publications were eliminated if not relevant to the clinical evaluation of patients or did not include clear definitions of POP. The titles and abstracts were reviewed using the Covidence database to determine whether they met the inclusion criteria. The manuscripts were reviewed for suitability using the Specialist Unit for Review Evidence checklists. The data from full-text manuscripts were extracted and then reviewed.

RESULTS

The search strategy found 11,242 abstracts, of which 220 articles were used to inform this narrative review. The main themes of this manuscript were the clinical examination, and the evaluation of comorbid conditions including the urinary tract (LUTS), gastrointestinal tract (GIT), pain, and sexual function. The physical examination of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should include a reproducible method of describing and quantifying the degree of POP and only the Pelvic Organ Quantification (POP-Q) system or the Simplified Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (S-POP) system have enough reproducibility to be recommended. POP examination should be done with an empty bladder and patients can be supine but should be upright if the prolapse cannot be reproduced. No other parameters of the examination aid in describing and quantifying POP. Post-void residual urine volume >100 ml is commonly used to assess for voiding difficulty. Prolapse reduction can be used to predict the possibility of postoperative persistence of voiding difficulty. There is no benefit of urodynamic testing for assessment of detrusor overactivity as it does not change the management. In women with POP and stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the cough stress test should be performed with a bladder volume of at least 200 ml and with the prolapse reduced either with a speculum or by a pessary. The urodynamic assessment only changes management when SUI and voiding dysfunction co-exist. Demonstration of preoperative occult SUI has a positive predictive value for de novo SUI of 40% but most useful is its absence, which has a negative predictive value of 91%. The routine addition of radiographic or physiological testing of the GIT currently has no additional value for a physical examination. In subjects with GIT symptoms further radiological but not physiological testing appears to aid in diagnosing enteroceles, sigmoidoceles, and intussusception, but there are no data on how this affects outcomes. There were no articles in the search on the evaluation of the co-morbid conditions of pain or sexual dysfunction in women with POP.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical pelvic examination remains the central tool for evaluation of POP and a system such as the POP-Q or S-POP should be used to describe and quantify. The value of investigation for urinary tract dysfunction was discussed and findings presented. The routine addition of GI radiographic or physiological testing is currently not recommended. There are no data on the role of the routine assessment of pain or sexual function, and this area needs more study. Imaging studies alone cannot replace clinical examination for the assessment of POP.

The Relationship Between Perineal Body Size, Total Vaginal Length, Apical Prolapse, and Prolapse Symptoms

IMPORTANCE

Currently, apical prolapse is diagnosed via assessing the levels of C and D points in the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. However, it is not yet known whether the other components of this system are useful for diagnosing apical prolapse and its symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between the perineal body size (PB), total vaginal length (TVL), and apical prolapse and its symptoms.

STUDY DESIGN

Two hundred women, 100 women with apical prolapse and 100 women without, were included in this cross-sectional study. The association between the PB, TVL, and apical prolapse and its symptoms were evaluated. The relationship between the other POP-Q measurements and apical prolapse/prolapse symptoms were also evaluated as the secondary outcome of the study.

RESULTS

The TVL (cutoff value, ≤8 cm; sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 60%) and the genital hiatus size (GH; cutoff value of >4.5 cm; sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 91%) were significantly associated with apical prolapse. The PB cutoff value of 3.4 cm or less had lower sensitivity (49%) and specificity (70%) for the diagnosis of apical prolapse. The GH (cutoff value, >4.8 cm; area under curve [AUC], 0.927), C (cutoff value, >-5.8 cm; AUC, 0.955), and Ba (cutoff value, >-1.1 cm; AUC, 0.891) were significantly associated with apical prolapse symptoms. However, there was no association between the PB or TVL with symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results showed that the TVL and GH were more strongly associated with apical prolapse than PB. The GH, C, and Ba were also associated with prolapse symptoms, but PB and TVL were not.

Clinical Risk Factors for Uterine Cervical Elongation among Women with Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Background: Cervical elongation is commonly associated with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). It was an identified risk for recurrent prolapse after hysteropexy, requiring additional surgeries. The aim of the study is to investigate the risk factors for uterine cervical elongation among women with POP. Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, women who underwent vaginal total hysterectomy for POP between 2014 and 2016 were collected. The cervical and total uterine lengths were measured by pathologists, while the ratio of cervical length to total uterine length were calculated. The cervical elongation is defined as corpus/cervix ratio ≤ 1.5. Results: A total of 133 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these patients, 43 women had cervical elongation and 90 women had normal length of uterine cervix. We found that age > 65 years old (67.4% vs. 42.2%, p = 0.007), total vaginal length ≥ 9.5 cm (65.1% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.035), uterine weight < 51 gm (72.1% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.03), and Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory 6 (POPDI-6) ≥ 12 (30.2% vs. 14.4%, p = 0.032) were associated with the risk of cervical elongation. There were no significant differences on preoperative urodynamic parameters in the two groups. Conclusion: The patient age > 65 years old, the total vaginal length of POP-Q system ≥ 9.5 cm, uterine weight < 51 g, and POPDI-6 ≥ 12 are independent risk factors of cervical elongation in women with POP. For women scheduled for pelvic reconstructive hysteropexy, concomitant cervical amputation should be considered.

Does Vaginal Parity Alter the Association Between Symptoms and Signs of Pelvic Organ Prolapse?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether the number of vaginal births a woman has alters the association between symptoms and signs of pelvic organ prolapse.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, we investigated data on 1748 women seen between April 2012 and January 2016. To elucidate whether the number of vaginal births is a confounder of this relationship, we used receiver operating characteristic statistics to investigate the association between symptoms and signs of prolapse in women of different vaginal parity.

RESULTS

A higher number of vaginal births was associated with a higher likelihood of symptoms of prolapse for any given degree of prolapse. Multivariate modeling, however, showed this confounding effect to be due to higher vaginal parity in older women (P < .001). Receiver operating characteristic curves obtained for the association between symptoms and signs of prolapse were near identical regardless of whether vaginal parity was included in the modeling. This was true for both clinical and imaging assessments of prolapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Although vaginal childbirth is associated with symptoms of prolapse, the number of vaginal births does not alter the relationship between symptoms and signs of prolapse among individuals presenting to a tertiary care center for evaluation. Previously published limits for "normal" pelvic organ mobility can be used irrespective of vaginal parity.

A uniaxial force and stiffness model of the vagina during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is the preferred procedure for restoring vaginal vault prolapse. An assistant uses a vaginal manipulator to position and tension the vault such that the surgeon can dissect the bladder, rectum and vault to eventually suture a synthetic mesh used to suspend the vagina to the longitudinal anterior vertebral ligament. Vaginal vault manipulation requires application of high forces for long periods of time.

METHODS

This work quantifies the task by measuring and analyzing the interaction forces and the workspace during vaginal vault manipulation. From the measurements we developed a uniaxial model, expressing the increase in interaction force and stiffness of the vagina. By adapting the model parameters, the difference in interaction force and stiffness between moderate and severe prolapse is predicted.

FINDINGS

For moderate prolapse the average interaction force and stiffness start at 2.56 N and 0.11 N mm^-1 in the tensionfree state, and go up to 20.14 N and 0.53 N mm^-1 after complete insertion of the instrument. For severe degrees of prolapse, tissue interaction is much lower starting at 1.68 N and 0.06 N mm^-1 while staying limited to 12.20 N and 0.30 N mm^-1 at full extension.

INTERPRETATION

Population data shows that the stage of prolapse and total vaginal length increase with age and parity. The interaction force and stiffness of the vagina are correlated with this degree of prolapse. By adapting the model parameters a good estimation of the tissue interaction is found for patients with mild and severe prolapse.